Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

CD200 Modulates S. aureus-Induced Innate Immune Responses Through Suppressing p38 Signaling

Rapid activation of macrophages plays a central role in eliminating invading bacteria as well as in triggering the inflammatory responses, but how the anti-bacterial and the inflammatory responses are coordinated, in terms of macrophages, is not completely understood. In this study, we demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) induced the expression of CD200 in murine macrophages in a dose-dependent manner. We found that CD200 significantly suppressed the S. aureus-induced production of nitric oxide and proinflammatory cytokines in mouse macrophages. Concurrently, the bactericidal capability of macrophages was boosted upon the deletion of CD200. Furthermore, our data demonstrated that p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) was selectively down-regulated by CD200 administration, while enhanced upon CD200 silence in response to staphylococcal infection. The negative effect of CD200 siRNA on NO production in macrophages was largely abrogated upon the inhibition of p38 signaling, implying its critical involvement in this regulation. Together, our data demonstrate that CD200 plays a central role in regulating the inflammatory responses and the anti-bacterial activity of macrophages, at least partially, through suppressing p38 activity.

The role of healthcare personnel in the maintenance and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Healthcare workers may acquire methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from patients, both hospital and home environments, other healthcare workers, family and public acquaintances, and pets. There is a consensus of case reports and series which now strongly support the role for MRSA-carrying healthcare personnel to serve as a reservoir and as a vehicle of spread within healthcare settings. Carriage may occur at a number of body sites and for short, intermediate, and long terms. A number of approaches have been taken to interrupt the linkage of staff-patient spread, but most emphasis has been placed on handwashing and the treatment of staff MRSA carriers. The importance of healthcare workers in transmission has been viewed with varying degrees of interest, and several logistical problems have arisen when healthcare worker screening is brought to the forefront. There is now considerable support for the screening and treatment of healthcare workers, but it is suggested that the intensity of any such approach must consider available resources, the nature of the outbreak, and the strength of epidemiological associations. The task of assessing healthcare personnel carriage in any context should be shaped with due regard to national and international guidelines, should be honed and practiced according to local needs and experience, and must be patient-oriented.

A purpose built MRSA cohort unit

The control of hospital-acquired infection, in particular methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains a challenge. Our hospital has established a purpose built 11-bed cohort unit with on-site rehabilitation for care of patients colonized with MRSA, in an attempt to improve their quality of care. Prior to the opening of this unit a number of concerns were voiced and the aim of this study was to address these. First, to establish if patient cohorting reduces the likelihood of successful decolonization, second, to evaluate the risk of staff colonization, and finally to see if successful environmental control of MRSA is possible.A patient database was established detailing patient demographics, infection rates, eradication and reacquisition rates. Staff screening was performed weekly, at the start of a period of duty. Sixty environmental sites were screened before unit opening, at 48h, six weeks and at six months. There were 88 admissions in the first six months; 62 patients were colonized with MRSA, and 26 patients (10 surgical, 16 medical) had MRSA infections. Twenty-three of 88 patients (26%) were successfully decolonized, which compares favourably with an eradication rate of 20% for the rest of the hospital. Twenty staff members participated in weekly screening. Five staff members colonized with MRSA were detected and all were successfully decolonized. Environmental control was achieved with a combination of a daily detergent clean and a once weekly clean with phenolic disinfectant. Our preliminary data suggest that, despite cohorting patients colonized with MRSA, with proper education and supervised cleaning protocols, it is possible to control environmental MRSA load, successfully decolonize patients and limit the risk of staff colonization.

Improved recognition of MRSA case clusters by the application of molecular subtyping using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is increasingly common in hospital and community populations, making the recognition of true nosocomial outbreaks more difficult. We have used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with Sma I digestion to analyse retrospectively two perceived outbreaks of epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 15 (EMRSA 15) colonization. The first cluster of cases in patients and staff on a general ward (ward D) revealed three different antibiograms based on differences in ciprofloxacin and rifampicin sensitivities. All isolates typed using PFGE, which was more discriminatory than phage-typing. One PFGE banding profile labelled type 5 was predominant, but 12 isolates proved to be subtypes of type 5 and two were PFGE type 11. Four staff members carried a strain not found in patients, three carried strains found in patients and transient carriage was highlighted as a problem when screening staff. PFGE enhanced the epidemiological data and proved that the cases on this ward did not comprise one large outbreak but numerous sporadic cases and smaller clusters. In contrast, isolates from a second cluster of cases which occurred on ward F were indistinguishable using antibiograms, phage-typing and PFGE, confirming this was more likely to be a true outbreak of colonization. We conclude that PFGE usefully augments epidemiological information and allows more logical infection control decisions to be made, with better utilization of scarce resources.

Trying to control MRSA causes more problems than it solves

Despite occasional reports of local success, the steadily increasing prevalence of strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to methicillin (MRSA) shows that attempts to limit their spread do not work. In this commentary we suggest that efforts to control the spread of methicillin-resistance are counterproductive, and that energies should instead be directed towards the control of outbreaks of disease and preventing the emergence of antibiotic resistance.

When should healthcare workers be screened for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

The role of screening of healthcare workers (HCWs) in the control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is controversial. It is recommended in guidelines by expert groups in both North America and the United Kingdom, although the role of MRSA carriage by HCWs in outbreaks is not clearly defined. The present report describes the spread of a distinct strain of MRSA to patients by a single HCW on three separate occasions over 27 months. The isolates from this HCW and patient contacts were shown to be indistinguishable by antibiogram and repetitive extragenic palindromic polymerase chain reaction (REP/PCR); none were typeable by lytic phage-typing. Throat carriage of the MRSA probably recurred in this HCW, despite attempts to eradicate it on three occasions. Over the same period, nine other small clusters were seen in the Oxford Hospital Group, involving 66 patients and 22 HCWs colonized, or occasionally infected, with a variety of MRSA strains. In none of these instances could HCWs be implicated in the initiation of an outbreak. The advantages of a screening policy include the determination of the full extent of MRSA-colonization and work exclusion; the disadvantages include detection of transient nasal carriage, disruption of staff routine and stigmatization. Screening of HCWs can be a valuable tool in the control of MRSA outbreaks but it should be used selectively. This strategy remains an important part of a control programme.