Analgesic use in the emergency department

Disparities in Pain Management

Health disparities in pain management remain a pervasive public health crisis. Racial and ethnic disparities have been identified in all aspects of pain management from acute, chronic, pediatric, obstetric, and advanced pain procedures. Disparities in pain management are not limited to race and ethnicity, and have been identified in multiple other vulnerable populations. This review targets health care disparities in the management of pain, focusing on steps health care providers and organizations can take to promote health care equity. A multifaceted plan of action with a focus on research, advocacy, policy changes, structural changes, and targeted interventions is recommended.

Opioid Prescription Patterns at Emergency Department Discharge for Children with Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To measure the variability in discharge opioid prescription practices for children discharged from the emergency department (ED) with a long-bone fracture.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of pediatric ED visits in 2015.

SETTING

Four pediatric EDs.

SUBJECTS

Children aged four to 18 years with a long-bone fracture discharged from the ED.

METHODS

A multisite registry of electronic health record data (PECARN Registry) was analyzed to determine the proportion of children receiving an opioid prescription on ED discharge. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine characteristics associated with receipt of an opioid prescription.

RESULTS

There were 5,916 visits with long-bone fractures; 79% involved the upper extremity, and 27% required reduction. Overall, 15% of children were prescribed an opioid at discharge, with variation between the four EDs: A = 8.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6.9-9.7%), B = 12.1% (95% CI = 10.5-14.0%), C = 16.9% (95% CI = 15.2-18.8%), D = 23.8% (95% CI = 21.7-26.1%). Oxycodone was the most frequently prescribed opioid. In the regression analysis, in addition to variation by ED site of care, age 12-18 years, white non-Hispanic, private insurance status, reduced fracture, and severe pain documented during the ED visit were associated with increased opioid prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

For children with a long-bone fracture, discharge opioid prescription varied widely by ED site of care. In addition, black patients, Hispanic patients, and patients with government insurance were less likely to be prescribed opioids. This variability in opioid prescribing was not accounted for by patient- or injury-related factors that are associated with increased pain. Therefore, opioid prescribing may be modifiable, but evidence to support improved outcomes with specific treatment regimens is lacking.

American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain

BACKGROUND

The management of acute and chronic pain for individuals living with sickle cell disease (SCD) is a clinical challenge. This reflects the paucity of clinical SCD pain research and limited understanding of the complex biological differences between acute and chronic pain. These issues collectively create barriers to effective, targeted interventions. Optimal pain management requires interdisciplinary care.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines developed by the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in pain management decisions for children and adults with SCD.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary panel, including 2 patient representatives, that was thoroughly vetted to minimize bias from conflicts of interest. The Mayo Evidence-Based Practice Research Program supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic reviews. Clinical questions and outcomes were prioritized according to importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used, including GRADE evidence-to-decision frameworks, to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment.

RESULTS

The panel reached consensus on 18 recommendations specific to acute and chronic pain. The recommendations reflect a broad pain management approach, encompassing pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions and analgesic delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of low-certainty evidence and closely balanced benefits and harms, most recommendations are conditional. Patient preferences should drive clinical decisions. Policymaking, including that by payers, will require substantial debate and input from stakeholders. Randomized controlled trials and comparative-effectiveness studies are needed for chronic opioid therapy, nonopioid therapies, and nonpharmacological interventions.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emergency Department Pain Management of Children With Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To test the hypotheses that minority children with long-bone fractures are less likely to (1) receive analgesics, (2) receive opioid analgesics, and (3) achieve pain reduction.

METHODS

We performed a 3-year retrospective cross-sectional study of children <18 years old with long-bone fractures using the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Registry (7 emergency departments). We performed bivariable and multivariable logistic regression to measure the association between patient race and ethnicity and (1) any analgesic, (2) opioid analgesic, (3) ≥2-point pain score reduction, and (4) optimal pain reduction (ie, to mild or no pain).

RESULTS

In 21 069 visits with moderate-to-severe pain, 86.1% received an analgesic and 45.4% received opioids. Of 8533 patients with reassessment of pain, 89.2% experienced ≥2-point reduction in pain score and 62.2% experienced optimal pain reduction. In multivariable analyses, minority children, compared with non-Hispanic (NH) white children, were more likely to receive any analgesics (NH African American: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.72 [95% confidence interval 1.51-1.95]; Hispanic: 1.32 [1.16-1.51]) and achieve ≥2-point reduction in pain (NH African American: 1.42 [1.14-1.76]; Hispanic: 1.38 [1.04-1.83]) but were less likely to receive opioids (NH African American: aOR 0.86 [0.77-0.95]; Hispanic: aOR 0.86 [0.76-0.96]) or achieve optimal pain reduction (NH African American: aOR 0.78 [0.67-0.90]; Hispanic: aOR 0.80 [0.67-0.95]).

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in process and outcome measures by race and ethnicity in the emergency department management of pain among children with long-bone fractures. Although minority children are more likely to receive analgesics and achieve ≥2-point reduction in pain, they are less likely to receive opioids and achieve optimal pain reduction.

Hospitalized patients' pain experience before and after the introduction of a nurse-based pain management programme: a separate sample pre and post study

Background

Many patients suffer from unrelieved pain in hospital settings. Nurses have a pivotal role in pain management. Hence, a nurse-based pain management programme may influence how hospitalized patients experience pain. In this study we investigated hospitalized patients’ experience of pain before and after the introduction of a two-component nurse-based pain management programme.

Methods

A quasi-experimental design with a separate sample pretest-posttest approach was conducted on a convenience sample of 845 patients (Survey 1: N = 282; Survey 2: N = 283; Survey 3: N = 280) admitted to the four inpatient units (medical, surgical, maternity, and gynecology) of a university medical center. Data were collected at baseline, before the intervention six weeks after pain management education, and finally immediately after four months of rounding using an interviewer-administered questionnaire adopted from a Brief Pain Inventory and the American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire.

Results

All the samples had similar sociocultural backgrounds. The proportion of patients who reported average moderate and severe pain intensity in the last 24 h were 68.8% in Survey 1, 72.8% in Survey 2 and then dropped to 48.53% in Survey 3 whereas those who reported moderate and severe pain intensity at the time of interview were 53.9% in Survey 1, 57.1% in Survey 2 and then dropped to 37.1% in Survey 3. The mean pain interference with the physical and emotional function was generally reduced across the surveys after the introduction of the nurse-based pain management programme. These reductions were statistically significant with p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Though the survey findings must be taken with caution, they demonstrate that the nurse-based pain management programme positively influenced patient-reported pain intensity and functional interference at the university medical center. This shows the potential clinical importance of the programme for hospitalized patients.

Is There Gender Discrimination in Acute Renal Colic Pain Management? A Retrospective Analysis in an Emergency Department Setting

BACKGROUND

Pain is a widespread problem, affecting both men and women; studies have found that women in the emergency department receive analgesic medication and opioids less often compared with men.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the administration and management of analgesics by the medical/paramedical staff in relation to the patients' gender, and thereby to examine the extent of gender discrimination in treating pain.

DESIGN

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study that included 824 patients.

SETTINGS

Emergency department of tertiary hospital in Israel.

PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS

The patients stratified by gender to compare pain treatments and waiting times between men and women in renal colic complaint.

METHODS

As an acute pain model, we used renal colic with a nephrolithiasis diagnosis confirmed by imaging. We recorded pain level by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores and number of VAS examinations. Time intervals were calculated between admissions to different stations in the emergency department. We recorded the number of analgesic drugs administered, type of drugs prescribed, and drug class (opioids or others).

RESULTS

A total of 824 patients (414 women and 410 men) participated. There were no significant differences in age, ethnicity, and laboratory findings. VAS assessments were higher in men than in women (6.43 versus 5.90, p = .001, respectively). More men than women received analgesics (68.8% versus 62.1%, p = .04, respectively) and opioids were prescribed more often for men than for women (48.3 versus 35.7%, p = .001). The number of drugs prescribed per patient was also higher in men compared with women (1.06 versus 0.93, p = .03). A significant difference was found in waiting time length from admission to medical examination between non-Jewish women and Jewish women.

CONCLUSIONS

We found differences in pain management between genders, which could be interpreted as gender discrimination. Yet these differences could also be attributed to other factors not based on gender discrimination but rather on gender differences.

Pain score, desire for pain treatment and effect on pain satisfaction in the emergency department: a prospective, observational study

Background

Pain management in the Emergency Department has often been described as inadequate, despite proven benefits of pain treatment protocols. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of our current pain protocol on pain score and patient satisfaction whilst taking the patients’ wishes for analgesia into account.

Methods

We conducted a 10-day prospective observational study in the Emergency Department. Demographics, pain characteristics, Numeric Rating Scale pain scores and the desire for analgesics were noted upon arrival at the Emergency Department. A second Numeric Rating Scale pain score and the level of patient satisfaction were noted 75–90 min after receiving analgesics. Student T-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare outcomes between patients desiring vs. not desiring analgesics or patients receiving vs. not receiving analgesics. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between potential predictors and outcomes.

Results

In this study 334 patients in pain were enrolled, of which 43.7% desired analgesics. Initial pain score was the only significant predictive factor for desiring analgesia, and differed between patients desiring (7.01) and not desiring analgesics (5.14). Patients receiving analgesics (52.1%) had a greater decrease in pain score than patients who did not receive analgesics (2.41 vs. 0.94). Within the group that did not receive analgesics there was no difference in satisfaction score between patients desiring and not desiring analgesics (7.48 vs. 7.54). Patients receiving analgesics expressed a higher satisfaction score than patients not receiving analgesics (8.10 vs. 7.53).

Conclusions

This study pointed out that more than half of the patients in pain entering the Emergency Department did not desire analgesics. In patients receiving analgesics, our pain protocol has shown to adequately treat pain, leading to a higher satisfaction for emergency health-care at discharge. This study emphasizes the importance of questioning pain score and desire for analgesics to prevent incorrect conclusions of inadequate pain management, as described in previous studies.

Intranasal fentanyl for the prehospital management of acute pain in children

INTRODUCTION

Acute pain is the most common symptom in the emergency setting and its optimal management continues to challenge prehospital emergency care practitioners, particularly in the paediatric population. Difficulty in establishing vascular access and fear of opiate administration to small children are recognized reasons for oligoanalgesia. Intranasal fentanyl (INF) has been shown to be as safe and effective as intravenous morphine in the treatment of severe pain in children in the Emergency Department setting.

AIM

This study aimed to describe the clinical efficacy and safety of INF when administered by advanced paramedics in the prehospital treatment of acute severe pain in children.

METHODS

A 1-year prospective cross-sectional study was carried out of children (>1 year, <16 years) who received INF as part of the prehospital treatment of acute pain by the statutory national emergency medical services in Ireland.

RESULTS

Ninety-four children were included in the final analysis [median age 11 years (interquartile range 7-13)]; 53% were males and trauma was implicated in 86% of cases. A clinically effective reduction in the pain score was found in 78 children [83% (95% confidence interval: 74-89%)]. The median initial pain rating score was 10. Pain assessment at 10 min after INF administration indicated a median pain rating of 5 (interquartile range 2-7). No patient developed an adverse event as a result of INF.

DISCUSSION

INF at a dose of 1.5 µg/kg appears to be a safe and effective analgesic in the prehospital management of acute severe pain in children and may be an attractive alternative to both oral and intravenous opiates.

Clinical predictors of the medical interventions provided to patients with low back pain in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Low back pain is a common complaint in emergency departments (ED), where deviations from standard of care have been noted.

OBJECTIVE

To relate the ordering of advanced imaging and opioid prescriptions with the presentation of low back pain in ED.

METHODS

Six hundred adults with low back pain from three centers were prospectively analyzed for history, examination, diagnosis, and the ordering of tests and treatments.

RESULTS

Of 559 cases the onset of pain was less than one week in 79.2%; however, most had prior low back pain, 63.5% having warning signs of a potential serious condition, and 83.9% had psychosocial risk factors. Computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were ordered in 16.6%, opioids were prescribed in 52.6%, and hospital admission in 4.5%. A one-year follow-up of 158 patients found 40.8% received subsequent spine care and 5.1% had a medically serious condition. Caucasian race, age 50 years or older, warning signs, and radicular findings were associated with advanced imaging. Severe pain and psychosocial factors were associated with opioid prescribing.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients present to the ED with acute exacerbations of chronic low back pain. Risk factors for a serious condition are common, but rarely do they develop. Racial disparities and psychosocial factors had concerning relationships with clinical decision-making.

Pain Management in the Emergency Department

Objectives

To determine the waiting time for administration of analgesia to patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with traumatic pain, and to determine how the severity of pain affects the patient's perception of pain and the treatment they receive.

Methods

Consecutive patients aged 18–65 years presenting to the ED during the 2-week study period with complaint of pain secondary to trauma were prospectively recruited. The numeric rating scale (NRS) was used to indicate the level of pain experienced by the patients. They were interviewed using a structured questionnaire and a chart review was also done after the patients had completed their ED visit.

Results

The mean time to analgesia was 77.6 min (95% CI = 63.2–92.0 min). Patients requesting analgesia at triage had a median pain score of 7 (range 0–10) while those who declined had a median pain score of 5 (range 0–10) (p = 0.002, Mann-Whitney U-test). The severity of the injuries sustained did not affect the patient's perception of their pain nor their preference for early analgesia. Indian patients had a significantly higher median pain score (p = 0.048).

Conclusion

Time to delivery of analgesia fell short of our patients' expectations. Assessing pain using the NRS is useful and should be incorporated as the ‘fifth’ vital sign. Process-improvement, healthcare workers and patient education regarding pain management are needed. Patients with a pain score of 7 or more should be offered analgesia at triage. Those with a pain score of 6 or less should still be given analgesia at triage if they request it.

A Review of Current and Emerging Approaches to Pain Management in the Emergency Department

INTRODUCTION

Pain is the most common symptom prompting an emergency department visit and emergency physicians are responsible for managing both acute pain and acute exacerbations of chronic pain resulting from a broad range of illnesses and injuries. The responsibility to treat must be balanced by the duty to limit harm resulting from analgesics. In recent years, opioid-related adverse effects, including overdose and deaths, have increased dramatically in the USA. In response to the US opioid crisis, emergency physicians have broadened their analgesic armamentarium to include a variety of non-opioid approaches. For some of these therapies, sparse evidence exists to support their efficacy for emergency department use. The purpose of this paper is to review historical trends and emerging approaches to emergency department analgesia, with a particular focus on the USA and Canada.

METHODS

We conducted a qualitative review of past and current descriptive studies of emergency department pain practice, as well as clinical trials of emerging pain treatment modalities. The review considers the increasing use of non-opioid and multimodal analgesic therapies, including migraine therapies, regional anesthesia, subdissociative-dose ketamine, nitrous oxide, intravenous lidocaine and gabapentinoids, as well as broad programmatic initiatives promoting the use of non-opioid analgesics and nonpharmacologic interventions.

RESULTS

While migraine therapies, regional anesthesia, nitrous oxide and subdissociative-dose ketamine are supported by a relatively robust evidence base, data supporting the emergency department use of intravenous lidocaine, gabapentinoids and various non-pharmacologic analgesic interventions remain sparse.

CONCLUSION

Additional research on the relative safety and efficacy of non-opioid approaches to emergency department analgesia is needed. Despite a limited research base, it is likely that non-opioid analgesic modalities will be employed with increasing frequency. A new generation of emergency physicians is seeking additional training in pain medicine and increasing dialogue between emergency medicine and pain medicine researchers, educators and clinicians could contribute to better management of emergency department pain.

Painful Discrimination in the Emergency Department: Risk Factors for Underassessment of Patients' Pain by Nurses

INTRODUCTION

Unrelieved acute musculoskeletal pain continues to be a reality of major clinical importance, despite advancements in pain management. Accurate pain assessment by nurses is crucial for effective pain management. Yet inaccurate pain assessment is a consistent finding worldwide in various clinical settings, including the emergency department. In this study, pain assessments between nurses and patients with acute musculoskeletal pain after extremity injury will be compared to assess discrepancies. A second aim is to identify patients at high risk for underassessment by emergency nurses.

METHODS

The prospective PROTACT study included 539 adult patients who were admitted to the emergency department with musculoskeletal pain. Data on pain assessment and characteristics of patients including demographics, pain, and injury, psychosocial, and clinical factors were collected using questionnaires and hospital registry.

RESULTS

Nurses significantly underestimated patients' pain with a mean difference of 2.4 and a 95% confidence interval of 2.2-2.6 on an 11-points numerical rating scale. Agreement between nurses' documented and patients' self-reported pain was only 27%, and 63% of the pain was underassessed. Pain was particularly underassessed in women, in persons with a lower educational level, in patients who used prehospital analgesics, in smokers, in patients with injury to the lower extremities, in anxious patients, and in patients with a lower urgency level.

DISCUSSION

Underassessment of pain by emergency nurses is still a major problem and might result in undertreatment of pain if the emergency nurses rely on their assessment to provide further pain treatment. Strategies that focus on awareness among nurses of which patients are at high risk of underassessment of pain are needed.

Peer Review and Feedback Can Modify Pain Treatment Patterns for Emergency Department Patients With Fractures

Consecutive fracture patients presenting to an adult (AED) or pediatric trauma center (PED) or a community teaching hospital (CED) were reviewed for treatment. Physicians received individual and group feedback. Data were dichotomized by age, gender, race and insurance status. Logistic regression analysis modeled variables approaching statistical significance. A total of 1454 patients participated in the study. The aggregate initial treatment rate was 54%, with no subgroup differences. Significant improvements were seen in all sites/subgroups; the final aggregate treatment rate was 84% (P < .001). PED and CED patients were less likely to receive treatment than AED patients (odds ratios = 0.49, 0.68). After feedback, whites were treated more often than were non-whites (84% vs 71%, P < .0001); CED alone did not show this pattern (odds ratios = AED 4.14, PED 2.67, CED1.28). Patients at all sites received improved pain treatment in association with directed feedback. Race and treatment site were significant factors.

Variables associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management

OBJECTIVE

The provision of 'adequate analgesia' (which reduces the pain score by ≥2 and to <4 [0-10 scale]) is significantly associated with high levels of satisfaction with pain management among adult patients. We aimed to determine the variables (including 'adequate analgesia') associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management.

METHODS

We undertook an observational, pilot study in a mixed, metropolitan ED. Patients aged 4-16 years with a triage pain score of ≥4 were enrolled. Data included demographics, presenting complaint, pain scores every 30 min, analgesia administered, time to first analgesia, provision of nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA), and 'adequate analgesia', and parent satisfaction 48-h post-discharge (6 point scale: very unsatisfied - very satisfied).

RESULTS

Complete data were collected on 185 patients: mean (SD) age 10.4 (3.6) years, weight 41.9 (17.8) kg; 93 (50.3%) were male. One hundred and ten (59.4%) parents were very satisfied with their child's pain management. Children of very satisfied parents had shorter times to analgesia than those who did not (median [interquartile range] 14 (33) vs 33 (46) min, respectively, P = 0.003). Parents whose children received NIA or 'adequate analgesia' were more often very satisfied than those whose children did not. However, the differences were not significant (difference in proportions: 13.2% [95% CI -1.9, 28.3], P = 0.07 and 10.2% [95% CI -5.02, 25.34], P = 0.16, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Short times to analgesia are associated with parent satisfaction. There were non-significant trends towards high levels of satisfaction following the provision of NIA and 'adequate analgesia'. These findings will inform a well-powered study to confirm this association.

Racial Disparities in Pain Management of Children With Appendicitis in Emergency Departments

IMPORTANCE

Racial disparities in use of analgesia in emergency departments have been previously documented. Further work to understand the causes of these disparities must be undertaken, which can then help inform the development of interventions to reduce and eradicate racial disparities in health care provision.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate racial differences in analgesia administration, and particularly opioid administration, among children diagnosed as having appendicitis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Repeated cross-sectional study of patients aged 21 years or younger evaluated in the emergency department who had an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of appendicitis, using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2003 to 2010. We calculated the frequency of both opioid and nonopioid analgesia administration using complex survey weighting. We then performed multivariable logistic regression to examine racial differences in overall administration of analgesia, and specifically opioid analgesia, after adjusting for important demographic and visit covariates, including ethnicity and pain score.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Receipt of analgesia administration (any and opioid) by race.

RESULTS

An estimated 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78-1.10) million children were diagnosed as having appendicitis. Of those, 56.8% (95% CI, 49.8%-63.9%) received analgesia of any type; 41.3% (95% CI, 33.7%-48.9%) received opioid analgesia (20.7% [95% CI, 5.3%-36.0%] of black patients vs 43.1% [95% CI, 34.6%-51.4%] of white patients). When stratified by pain score and adjusted for ethnicity, black patients with moderate pain were less likely to receive any analgesia than white patients (adjusted odds ratio = 0.1 [95% CI, 0.02-0.8]). Among those with severe pain, black patients were less likely to receive opioids than white patients (adjusted odds ratio = 0.2 [95% CI, 0.06-0.9]). In a multivariable model, there were no significant differences in the overall rate of analgesia administration by race. However, black patients received opioid analgesia significantly less frequently than white patients (12.2% [95% CI, 0.1%-35.2%] vs 33.9% [95% CI, 0.6%-74.9%], respectively; adjusted odds ratio = 0.2 [95% CI, 0.06-0.8]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Appendicitis pain is undertreated in pediatrics, and racial disparities with respect to analgesia administration exist. Black children are less likely to receive any pain medication for moderate pain and less likely to receive opioids for severe pain, suggesting a different threshold for treatment.

Analgesia for fracture pain in children: methodological issues surrounding clinical trials and effectiveness of therapy

Fractures in childhood are common painful conditions. Suboptimal analgesia has been reported in the emergency department and following discharge. Recently, concern about the safety of narcotics such as codeine has sparked a renewed interest in opioids such as morphine for pediatric fracture pain. Consequently, opioids are being increasingly used in the clinical setting. Despite this, there is ample evidence that clinicians are more willing to offer opioids to adults than children. The existence of limited evidence supporting their use in children is likely a major contributing factor. A closer look at the limitations of designing high-quality analgesic trials in children with fractures is needed to enable investigators to anticipate problems and clinicians to make evidence-based choices.

A Survey of Caregiver Perspectives on Children's Pain Management in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

We explored caregiver perspectives on their children's pain management in both a pediatric (PED) and general emergency department (GED). Study objectives were to: (1) measure caregiver estimates of children's pain scores and treatment; (2) determine caregiver level of satisfaction; and (3) determine factors associated with caregiver satisfaction.

METHODS

This prospective survey examined a convenience sample of 97 caregivers (n=51 PED, n=46 GED) with children aged <17 years. A paper-based survey was distributed by research assistants, from 2009-2011.

RESULTS

Most caregivers were female (n=77, 79%) and were the child's mother (n=69, 71%). Children were treated primarily for musculoskeletal pain (n=41, 42%), headache (n=16, 16%) and abdominal pain (n=7, 7%). Using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale, the maximum mean reported pain score was 75 mm (95% CI: 70-80) and mean score at discharge was 39 mm (95% CI: 32-46). Ninety percent of caregiver respondents were satisfied (80/89, 90%); three (3/50, 6%) were dissatisfied in the PED and six (6/39, 15%) in the GED. Caregivers who rated their child's pain at ED discharge as severe were less likely to be satisfied than those who rated their child's pain as mild or moderate (p=0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite continued pain upon discharge, most caregivers report being satisfied with their child's pain management. Caregiver satisfaction is likely multifactorial, and physicians should be careful not to interpret satisfaction as equivalent to adequate provision of analgesia. The relationship between satisfaction and pain merits further exploration.

Survey of pain etiology, management practices and patient satisfaction in two urban emergency departments

Objective:

The underuse of analgesics, or “oligoanalgesia,” is common in emergency departments (EDs). To improve care we must understand our patients’ pain experiences as well as our clinical practice patterns. To this end, we examined pain etiology, pain management practices and patient satisfaction in 2 urban EDs.

Methods:

We conducted a cross-sectional study using structured interviews and chart reviews for patients with pain who presented to either of 2 university-affiliated EDs. We assessed pain etiologies, patient pain experiences, pain management practices, and patient satisfaction with pain management.

Results:

The 525 study subjects reported high pain intensity levels on presentation, with a median rating of 8 on a 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). At discharge, pain severity had decreased to a median rating of 4; however, 48% of patients were discharged from the ED in moderate to severe pain (NRS 5–10). Subjects reported spending 57% of their ED stay in moderate to severe pain. Analgesics were administered to only 50% of patients. The mean time to analgesic administration was almost 2 hours. Despite high levels of reported pain at discharge and low rates of analgesic administration, subjects reported high satisfaction with pain management.

Conclusions:

In the 2 EDs studied, we found high levels of pain severity for our patients, as well as low levels of analgesic use. When used, analgesic administration was often delayed. Despite these findings, patient satisfaction remained high. Despite recent efforts to improve pain management practice; oligoanalgesia remains a problem for our specialty.

Nurse-initiated, titrated intravenous opioid analgesia reduces time to analgesia for selected painful conditions

Objectives:

Traditionally, patients have to wait until assessed by a physician for opioid analgesia to be administered, which contributes to delays to analgesia. Western Hospital developed a protocol enabling nurses to initiate opioid analgesia prior to medical assessment for selected conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of this protocol on time to first opioid dose in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with renal or biliary colic.

Methods:

This was an explicit medical record review of all adult patients with an ED discharge diagnosis of renal or biliary colic presenting to a metropolitan teaching hospital ED. Patients were identified via the ED data management system. Data collected included demographics, condition, triage category, time of presentation, whether analgesia was nurse-initiated or not, and interval from arrival to first opioid analgesic dose. The narcotic drug register for the relevant period was also searched to cross-check whether opiates were doctor- or nurse-initiated.

Results:

There were 58 presentations in the nurse-initiated opioid analgesia group and 99 in the non-nurse-initiated analgesia group. Groups were reasonably well matched for gender, triage category and time of presentation, but there was a higher proportion of biliary colic in the non-nurse-initiated analgesia group. Median time to first analgesic dose was 31 minutes in the nurse-initiated group and 57 minutes in the non-nurse-initiated analgesia group (effect size, 26 minutes; 95% confidence interval 16-36 min;p&lt; 0.0001]. There were no major adverse events in either group.

Conclusion:

A nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocol reduces delays to opioid analgesia for patients with renal and biliary colic.

Vital Signs Are Not Associated with Self-Reported Acute Pain Intensity in the Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to ascertain the association between self-reported pain intensity and vital signs in both emergency department (ED) patients and a subgroup of patients with diagnosed conditions known to produce significant pain.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of real-time, archived data from an electronic medical record system at an urban teaching hospital and regional community hospital. We included consecutive ED patients ≥16 years old who had a self-reported pain intensity ≥1 as measured during triage, from March 2005 to December 2012. The primary outcome was vital signs for self-reported pain intensity levels (mild, moderate, severe) on an 11-point verbal numerical scale. Changes in pain intensity levels were also compared to variations in vital signs. Both analyses were repeated on a subgroup of patients with diagnosed conditions recognized to produce significant pain: fracture, dislocation, or renal colic.

RESULTS

We included 153,567 patients (mean age of 48.4±19.3 years; 55.5% women) triaged with pain (median intensity of 7/10±3). Of these, 8.9% of patients had diagnosed conditions recognized to produce significant pain. From the total sample, the difference between mild and severe pain categories was 2.7 beats/minutes (95% CI: 2.4-3.0) for heart rate and 0.13 mm Hg (95% CI: -0.26-0.52) for systolic blood pressure. These differences generated small effect sizes and were not clinically significant. Results were similar for patients who experienced changes in pain categories and for those conditions recognized to produce significant pain.

CONCLUSION

Health care professionals cannot use vital signs to estimate or substantiate self-reported pain intensity levels or changes over time.

Ultrasound-guided forearm nerve blocks in kids: a novel method for pain control in the treatment of hand-injured pediatric patients in the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound-guided forearm nerve blocks have been shown to safely reduce pain for emergency procedures in the adult emergency department (ED). Although ultrasonography is widely used for forearm nerve blocks in the adult ED and in the pediatric operating room, no study to date has examined its use in the pediatric emergency setting.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective nonblinded descriptive study of ultrasound-guided ulnar, median, and radial nerve blocks in a convenience sample of pediatric patients with hand injuries requiring procedural intervention who presented to a freestanding pediatric ED.

RESULTS

The mean initial pain score for the sample was 5.8, and the mean postprocedure score was 0.8, with a mean on the 10-point visual pain scale of 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 3-6; P = 0.04). Seven patients reported complete resolution of their pain that was signified by a score of 0. The mean time to completion for ulnar nerve block was 79 seconds (IQR, 67-103 seconds). The mean time to completion for median nerve block was 76 seconds (IQR, 70-112 seconds). The mean time to completion for radial nerve block was 69 seconds (IQR, 60-100 seconds). No immediate complications, including vascular puncture, carpal tunnel injury, or direct nerve injection, were noted during the study. At 1-year follow-up, no adverse effects were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound-guided forearm nerve blocks are effective for pediatric patients in the ED. The procedure provides effective analgesia and facilitates care while minimizing iatrogenic risk.

Pain management in the emergency chain: the use and effectiveness of pain management in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain

OBJECTIVE

While acute musculoskeletal pain is a frequent complaint in emergency care, its management is often neglected, placing patients at risk for insufficient pain relief. Our aim is to investigate how often pain management is provided in the prehospital phase and emergency department (ED) and how this affects pain relief. A secondary goal is to identify prognostic factors for clinically relevant pain relief.

DESIGN

This prospective study (PROTACT) includes 697 patients admitted to ED with musculoskeletal extremity injury. Data regarding pain, injury, and pain management were collected using questionnaires and registries.

RESULTS

Although 39.9% of the patients used analgesics in the prehospital phase, most patients arrived at the ED with severe pain. Despite the high pain prevalence in the ED, only 35.7% of the patients received analgesics and 12.5% received adequate analgesic pain management. More than two-third of the patients still had moderate to severe pain at discharge. Clinically relevant pain relief was achieved in only 19.7% of the patients. Pain relief in the ED was higher in patients who received analgesics compared with those who did not. Besides analgesics, the type of injury and pain intensity on admission were associated with pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still room for improvement of musculoskeletal pain management in the chain of emergency care. A high percentage of patients were discharged with unacceptable pain levels. The use of multimodal pain management or the implementation of a pain management protocol might be useful methods to optimize pain relief. Additional research in these areas is needed.

Factors associated to unrelieved pain in a Morrocan Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

In the light of the impact that pain has on patients, emergency department (ED) physicians need to be well versed in its management, particularly in its acute presentation. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the prevalence of unrelieved acute pain during ED stay in a Moroccan ED, and to identify risk factors of unrelieved pain.

METHODS

Prospective survey of patients admitted to the emergency department of Ibn Sina teaching university hospital in Rabat (Morocco). All patients with acute pain over a period of 10 days, 24 hours each day were included. From each patient, demographic and clinical data, pain characteristics, information concerning pain management, outcomes, and length of stay were collected. Pain intensity was evaluated both on arrival and before discharge using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Comparison between patient with relieved and unrelieved pain, and factors associated with unrelieved pain were analyzed using stepwise forward logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 305 patients who complained of acute pain, we found high levels of intense to severe pain at ED arrival (91.1%). Pain intensity decreased at discharge (46.9%). Unrelieved pain was assessed in 24.3% of cases. Patients with unrelieved pain were frequently accompanied (82.4% vs 67.1%, p = 0.012), and more admitted daily than night (8 am-20 pm: 78.4% vs 64.9%; 21 pm-7 am: 21.6% vs 35.1%, p = 0.031), and complained chiefly of pain less requently (56.8% vs 78.8%, p<0.001). They had progressive pain (73% vs 44.2%, p<0.001), and had a longer duration of pain before ED arrival (72-168 h: 36.5% vs 16.9%; >168 h: 25.5% vs 17.7%, p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, predictor factors of unrelieved pain were: accompanied patients (OR = 2.72, 95% CI = 1.28- 5.76, p = 0.009), pain as chief complaint (OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1,25-4.31, p = 0.007), cephalic site of pain (OR = 6.28, 95% CI = 2.26-17.46, p<0.001), duration of pain before admission more than 72 hours (72-168 h (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 3.13-25.30, p = 0.001), and >168 h (OR = 4.55, 95% CI = 1.77-14.90, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This study reported high levels of intense to severe pain at ED arrival. However, one quarter patients felt on discharge from the ED that their pain had not been relieved. The relief of pain in ED depend both sociodemographic, clinical, and pain characteristics factors.

Quality indicators for the assessment and management of pain in the emergency department: a systematic review

Appropriate and timely treatment of pain are very important, particularly in the emergency department, where pain continues to be undertreated. One of the ways in which the undertreatment of pain can be mitigated is the use of defined quality benchmarks. This systematic review of the literature was performed to identify such quality indicators. The resulting 20 quality indicators may be used to improve pain assessment and management protocols in the emergency department setting.

BACKGROUND:

Evidence indicates that pain is undertreated in the emergency department (ED). The first step in improving the pain experience for ED patients is to accurately and systematically assess the actual care being provided. Identifying gaps in the assessment and treatment of pain and improving patient outcomes requires relevant, evidence-based performance measures.

OBJECTIVE:

To systematically review the literature and identify quality indicators specific to the assessment and management of pain in the ED.

METHODS:

Four major bibliographical databases were searched from January 1980 to December 2010, and relevant journals and conference proceedings were manually searched. Original research that described the development or collection of data on one or more quality indicators relevant to the assessment or management of pain in the ED was included.

RESULTS:

The search identified 18,078 citations. Twenty-three articles were included: 15 observational (cohort) studies; three before-after studies; three audits; one quality indicator development study; and one survey. Methodological quality was moderate, with weaknesses in the reporting of study design and methodology. Twenty unique indicators were identified, with the majority (16 of 20) measuring care processes. Overall, 91% (21 of 23) of the studies reported indicators for the assessment or management of presenting pain, as opposed to procedural pain. Three of the studies included children; however, none of the indicators were developed specifically for a pediatric population.

CONCLUSION:

Gaps in the existing literature include a lack of measures reflecting procedural pain, patient outcomes and the pediatric population. Future efforts should focus on developing indicators specific to these key areas.

Is all pain is treated equally? A multicenter evaluation of acute pain care by age

Pain is highly prevalent in health care settings; however, disparities continue to exist in pain care treatment. Few studies have investigated if differences exist based on patient-related characteristics associated with aging. The objective of this study was to determine if there are differences in acute pain care for older vs younger patients. This was a multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional observation study of 5 emergency departments across the United States evaluating the 2 most commonly presenting pain conditions for older adults, abdominal and fracture pain. Multivariable adjusted hierarchical modeling was completed. A total of 6,948 visits were reviewed. Older (⩾ 65 years) and oldest (⩾ 85 years) were less likely to receive analgesics compared to younger patients (<65 years), yet older patients had greater reductions in final pain scores. When evaluating pain treatment and final pain scores, differences appeared to be based on type of pain. Older patients with abdominal pain were less likely to receive pain medications, while older patients with fracture were more likely to receive analgesics and opioids compared to younger patients. Differences in pain care for older patients appear to be driven by the type of presenting pain.

Is adequate pain relief and time to analgesia associated with emergency department length of stay? A retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the association of adequate analgesia and time to analgesia with emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS).

SETTING AND DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of real-time archived data.

PARTICIPANTS

We included all consecutive ED patients ≥18 years with pain intensity >6 (verbal numerical scale from 0 to 10), assigned to an ED bed, and whose pain was re-evaluated less than 1 h after receiving analgesic treatment.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was ED-LOS in patients who had adequate pain relief (AR=↓50% pain intensity) compared with those who did not have such relief (NR).

RESULTS

A total of 2033 patients (mean age 49.5 years; 51% men) met our inclusion criteria; 58.3% were discharged, and 41.7% were admitted. Among patients discharged or admitted, there was no significant difference in ED-LOS between those with AR (median (25th-75th centile): 9.6 h (6.3-14.8) and 18.2 h (11.6-25.7), respectively) and NR (median (25th-75th centile): 9.6 h (6.6-16.0) and 17.4 h (11.3-26.5), respectively). After controlling for confounding factors, rapid time to analgesia (not AR) was associated with shorter ED-LOS of discharged and admitted patients (p<0.001 and <0.05, respectively). When adjusting for confounding variables, ED-LOS is shortened by 2 h (95% CI 1.1 to 2.8) when delay to receive analgesic is <90 min compared with >90 min for discharged and by 2.3 h (95% CI 0.17 to 4.4) for admitted patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, AR was not linked with short ED-LOS. However, rapid administration of analgesia was associated with short ED-LOS.

Clinician impression versus prescription drug monitoring program criteria in the assessment of drug-seeking behavior in the emergency department

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We compare emergency provider impression of drug-seeking behavior with objective criteria from a state prescription drug monitoring program, assess change in opioid pain reliever prescribing after prescription drug monitoring program review, and examine clinical factors associated with suspected drug-seeking behavior.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of emergency providers assessing a convenience sample of patients aged 18 to 64 years who presented to either of 2 academic medical centers with chief complaint of back pain, dental pain, or headache. Drug-seeking behavior was objectively defined as present when a patient had greater than or equal to 4 opioid prescriptions by greater than or equal to 4 providers in the 12 months before emergency department evaluation. Emergency providers completed data forms recording their impression of the likelihood of drug-seeking behavior, patient characteristics, and plan for prescribing pre- and post-prescription drug monitoring program review. Descriptive statistics were generated. We calculated agreement between emergency provider impression of drug-seeking behavior and prescription drug monitoring program definition, and sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of emergency provider impression, using prescription drug monitoring program criteria as the criterion standard. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine clinical factors associated with drug-seeking behavior.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight emergency providers with prescription drug monitoring program access participated. There were 544 patient visits entered into the study from June 2011 to January 2013. There was fair agreement between emergency provider impression of drug-seeking behavior and prescription drug monitoring program (κ=0.30). Emergency providers had sensitivity 63.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.8% to 71.7%), specificity 72.7% (95% CI 68.4% to 77.0%), and positive predictive value 41.2% (95% CI 34.4% to 48.2%) for identifying drug-seeking behavior. After exposure to prescription drug monitoring program data, emergency providers changed plans to prescribe opioids at discharge in 9.5% of cases (95% CI 7.3% to 12.2%), with 6.5% of patients (n=35) receiving opioids not previously planned and 3.0% (n=16) no longer receiving opioids. Predictors for drug-seeking behavior by prescription drug monitoring program criteria were patient requests opioid medications by name (odds ratio [OR] 1.91; 95% CI 1.13 to 3.23), multiple visits for same complaint (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.49 to 4.18), suspicious history (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.19), symptoms out of proportion to examination (OR 1.83; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.03), and hospital site (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.76 to 5.44).

CONCLUSION

Emergency providers had fair agreement with objective criteria from the prescription drug monitoring program in suspecting drug-seeking behavior. Program review changed management plans in a small number of cases. Multiple clinical factors were predictive of drug-seeking behavior.

Rapid bedside triage does not affect the delivery of pain medication for extremity pain in the pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVE

Rapid bedside triage (RBT), rather than traditional waiting room triage (WRT), is becoming a "best practice" in managing emergency department (ED) patient flow, yet little is known about the impact of this process on other aspects of patient care. This study was designed to compare overall adherence to an existing nurse-driven ED pain protocol after changing from a WRT to an RBT process.

METHODS

On November 1, 2011, the triage process at our institution changed from a traditional WRT system to an in-department RBT allowing for comparison of the 2 groups. A retrospective chart review assessing compliance with the department's pain protocol was performed on all patients presenting to the ED during October and November 2011, representing the immediate time periods before and after the implementation of the change in triage process. Patients younger than 19 years, with complaint of isolated extremity pain or injury, were included in this analysis. Compliance was defined as patients having a pain score assessed and pain medication given for scores of 4 or more within 30 minutes of arrival.

RESULTS

In total, 546 patients were identified for inclusion in the study; 306 received traditional WRT, and 240 received RBT. Compliance with the pain protocol was seen in 54.6% of patients receiving WRT versus 57.5% receiving RBT (P = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Changing from a traditional WRT process to an in-department RBT process resulted in no change in the compliance with the existing pain protocol.

Management of Pain in the Emergency Department

Since pain is a primary impetus for patient presentation to the Emergency Department (ED), its treatment should be a priority for acute care providers. Historically, the ED has been marked by shortcomings in both the evaluation and amelioration of pain. Over the past decade, improvements in the science of pain assessment and management have combined to facilitate care improvements in the ED. The purpose of this review is to address selected topics within the realm of ED pain management. Commencing with general principles and definitions, the review continues with an assessment of areas of controversy and advancing knowledge in acute pain care. Some barriers to optimal pain care are discussed, and potential mechanisms to overcome these barriers are offered. While the review is not intended as a resource for specific pain conditions or drug information, selected agents and approaches are mentioned with respect to evolving evidence and areas for future research.

Association of pain score documentation and analgesic use in a pediatric emergency department

OBJECTIVES

This study characterizes the association between pain score documentation and analgesic administration among pediatric emergency department patients.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a prospectively collected research database from an academic emergency department. Records of randomly sampled pediatric patients seen between August 2005 and October 2006 were reviewed. Pain scores from age-appropriate 0 to 10 numeric pain rating scales were abstracted (≥ 7 considered severe). Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

An initial pain score was documented in 87.4% of 4514 patients enrolled, 797 (17.7%) with severe pain. Of these, 63.1% (95% CI, 59.7%-66.5%) received an analgesic, and 16.7% (95% CI, 14.2%-19.5%) received it parenterally. Initial pain score documentation was similar across age groups. Patients younger than 2 years with severe pain were less likely to receive analgesics compared with teenaged patients with severe pain (32.1%; 95% CI, 15.9%-52.3%) versus 67.6% (95% CI, 63.2%-71.7%). Of 502 patients with documented severe pain who received analgesic, 23.3% (95% CI, 19.7%-27.3%) had a second pain score documented within 2 hours of the first. Documentation of a second pain score was associated with the use of parenteral analgesic and a second dose of analgesic.

CONCLUSIONS

In this population, initial pain score documentation was common, but severe pain was frequently untreated, most often in the youngest patients. Documentation of a second pain score was not common but was associated with more aggressive pain management when it occurred. Further study is needed to investigate causation and to explore interventions that increase the likelihood of severe pain being treated.

The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children

INTRODUCTION

Young children frequently undergo diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in the emergency department (ED). Although developed and validated for postoperative pain, Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain scores have been recommended and used for the assessment of procedural pain as well. We set out to assess if FLACC scores can differentiate pain and distress and establish a hierarchy of FLACC scores experienced during common ED procedures.

METHODS

Prospective observational study at an urban tertiary children's hospital ED. We aimed to recruit 30 children each aged 6 to 42 months undergoing intravenous cannula (IV) insertion, nasogastric tube (NGT) insertion, metered dose inhaler (MDI) use and oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) measurement. Based on videotapes, 2 independent observers assessed pain and distress using FLACC scores during all procedural phases.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were recruited and filmed for IV (33), NGT (30), MDI (34), and SpO2 (28). Median FLACC scores were as follows: NGT, 10 (interquartile range [IQR] 8.75-10); IV, 6.5 (IQR, 4.5-9.75); MDI, 6.5 (IQR, 0-9); and SpO(2), 0 (IQR, 0-0.5). The FLACC scores increased during each of the 3 phases, before the procedure, during restraint, and during the procedure. Procedural distress decreased with age except for NGT insertions, which remained very high irrespective of age.

CONCLUSIONS

FLACC scores can be high during nonpainful procedures and the during restraint phase of painful procedures. This indicates that FLACC measures a composite of pain and distress in young children. This study identified substantial levels of pain and distress in young children by FLACC during commonly performed ED procedures, with nasogastric tube insertion having very high and intravenous cannulation/venepuncture and MDI having high FLACC scores.

Distraction techniques for children undergoing procedures: a critical review of pediatric research

Pediatric patients are often subjected to procedures that can cause pain and anxiety. Although pharmacologic interventions can be used, distraction is a simple and effective technique that directs children's attention away from noxious stimuli. However, there is a multitude of techniques and technologies associated with distraction. Given the range of distraction techniques, the purpose of this article was to provide a critical assessment of the evidence-based literature that can inform clinical practice and future research. Recommendations include greater attention to child preferences and temperament as a means of optimizing outcomes and heightening awareness around child participation in health care decision making.

Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems

Control of pain and stress for children is a vital component of emergency medical care. Timely administration of analgesia affects the entire emergency medical experience and can have a lasting effect on a child's and family's reaction to current and future medical care. A systematic approach to pain management and anxiolysis, including staff education and protocol development, can provide comfort to children in the emergency setting and improve staff and family satisfaction.

Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block for pain control in an infant with a femur fracture due to nonaccidental trauma

A 3-month-old infant girl was transferred to our emergency department (ED) with a subtrochanteric femoral neck fracture due to nonaccidental trauma. She received multiple doses of parenteral analgesics both before arrival and in our ED. We performed an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block using 2.0 mL of 0.25% bupivicaine (approximately 1.25 mg/kg) before placing the patient in a Pavlik harness. Successful pain control was achieved within 15 minutes of the procedure allowing pain-free manipulation of the affected extremity. The patient required only a single dose of parenteral narcotics during the ensuing 18 hours. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block used in the ED for pain control in a pediatric patient.

Prospective evaluation of the treatment of pain in the ED using computerized physician order entry

BACKGROUND

Treatment of pain in the emergency department (ED) is a significant area of focus, as previous studies have noted generally inadequate treatment of pain in ED patients. Previous studies have not evaluated the impact of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the treatment of pain in the ED. We sought to evaluate treatment of pain before and after implementation of CPOE in an academic ED.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED with a pain-related complaint in 4-month periods before and after CPOE implementation. We compared numbers who received pain medications, time from registration to administration of pain medication, and repeat dosing of pain medication.

RESULTS

Six hundred forty-six ED patients participated in the pre-CPOE period, whereas 592 patients participated post-CPOE. Similar numbers of patients received pain medications in the pre-CPOE and post-CPOE periods (55% vs 59%; P = .139), whereas those in the post-CPOE period were more likely to receive a repeat dose of pain medications (10.5% vs 17.6%; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The use of CPOE in the ED may offer modest benefits in the treatment of patients with pain-related complaints.

Emergency department crowding is associated with decreased quality of analgesia delivery for children with pain related to acute, isolated, long-bone fractures

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to determine which quality measures of analgesia delivery are most influenced by emergency department (ED) crowding for pediatric patients with long-bone fractures.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, retrospective study included patients 0-21 years seen for acute, isolated long-bone fractures, November 2007 to October 2008, at a children's hospital ED. Nine quality measures were studied: six were based on the timeliness (1-hour receipt) and effectiveness (receipt/nonreceipt) of three fracture-related processes: pain score, any analgesic, and opioid analgesic administration. Three equity measures were also tested: language, identified primary care provider (PCP), and insurance. The primary independent variable was a crowding measure: ED occupancy. Models were adjusted for age, language, insurance, identified PCP, triage level, ambulance arrival, and time of day. The adjusted risk of each timeliness or effectiveness quality measure was measured at five percentiles of crowding and compared to the risk at the 10th and 90th percentiles. The role of equity measures as moderators of the crowding-quality models was tested.

RESULTS

The study population included 1,229 patients. Timeliness and effectiveness quality measures showed an inverse association with crowding-an effect not moderated by equity measures. Patients were 4% to 47% less likely to receive timely care and were 3% to 17% less likely to receive effective care when each crowding measure was at the 90th than at the 10th percentile (p < 0.05). For three of the six quality measures, quality declined steeply between the 75th and 90th crowding percentiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Crowding is associated with decreased timeliness and effectiveness, but not equity, of analgesia delivery for children with fracture-related pain.

Acute pain management curriculum for emergency medicine residency programs

Pain is the most common reason people visit emergency departments (EDs); this implies that emergency physicians (EPs) should be experts in managing acute painful conditions. The current trend in the literature, however, demonstrates that EPs possess inadequate knowledge and lack formal training in acute pain management. The purpose of this article is to create a formal educational curriculum that would assist emergency medicine (EM) residents in proper assessment and treatment of acute pain, as well as in providing a solid theoretical and practical knowledge base for managing acute pain in the ED. The authors propose a series of lectures, case-oriented study groups, practical small group sessions, and class-specific didactics with the goal of enhancing the theoretical and practical knowledge of acute pain management in the ED.

Emergency department crowding is associated with decreased quality of care for children

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine which of several simple indicators of emergency department crowding are most predictive of quality of care in 2 pediatric disease models: acute asthma and pain associated with long-bone fractures.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients 2 to 21 years old seen for acute asthma and patients 0 to 21 years old seen for acute, isolated long-bone fractures from November 1, 2007, to October 31, 2008, at a single, academic children's hospital emergency department. The main outcome measures were quality measures based on 3 asthma care-related processes-asthma score, β-agonist, and corticosteroid-and 2 fracture-related processes-analgesic and opioid analgesic. Good quality care was defined as receipt of an indicated process within 1 hour of arrival. Poor quality care was defined as nonreceipt or delayed receipt of an indicated process. Nine crowding measures were assigned based on conditions at each patient's arrival. We calculated the adjusted risk of receiving good quality care for each quality measure at 5 percentiles of crowding for each crowding measure.

RESULTS

The asthma population included 927 patients, and the fracture population included 1229 patients. Among the 5 quality measures, we found rates of good quality care ranging from 23% to 64%. In adjusted models, we found an inverse association between crowding and quality. The 2 crowding measures with a consistently inverse association with the 5 quality measures across both populations were total patient-care hours and number arriving in prior 6 hours. Across the 10 models combining 1 of 2 key crowding variables with 1 of 5 quality measures, patients in the 2 populations were 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.55) to 0.78 (confidence interval, 0.71-0.85) times as likely to receive the indicated care process within 1 hour when each crowding measure was at the 75th than at the 25th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Two measures of ED crowding are consistently associated with lower-quality asthma- and fracture-specific care in the ED for pediatric patients.

Pain management in emergency departments: a review of present protocols in The Netherlands

This descriptive study presents availability and content of acute pain protocols in emergency departments (EDs) in The Netherlands. Current acute pain protocols were collected and an a priori list of questions was used for analysis. Findings were compared with current international standards. Sixty-six of the 108 EDs responded. Fifty-six percent of the protocols did not address adults and 35% did not address children. Protocols were rather conservative and showed poor multidisciplinary approach. Seventy-three percent required a diagnosis before pain relief. Six percent did not include opioids, 36% did not allow intravenous opioids and only 49% allowed direct administration of opioids in severe pain. Pain measurement was included in 55% and in only 5% a target score was defined. Nonpharmacological approaches were mentioned in 6%. Acute pain protocols are lacking in many EDs. Most protocols did not apply current standards. We exposed an area with space for leadership.

Emergency department crowding is associated with decreased quality of care for children with acute asthma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We seek to determine which dimensions of quality of care are most influenced by emergency department (ED) crowding for patients with acute asthma exacerbations.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study with retrospective data collection included patients aged 2 to 21 years treated for acute asthma during November 2007 to October 2008 at a children's hospital ED. We studied 3 processes of care-asthma score, β-agonist, and corticosteroid administration-and 9 quality measures representing 3 quality dimensions: timeliness (1-hour receipt of each process), effectiveness (receipt/nonreceipt of each process), and equity (language, identified primary care provider, and insurance). Primary independent variables were 2 crowding measures: ED occupancy and number waiting to see an attending-level physician. Models were adjusted for age, language, insurance, primary care access, triage level, ambulance arrival, oximetry, smoke exposure, and time of day. For timeliness and effectiveness quality measures, we calculated the adjusted risk of each quality measure at 5 percentiles of crowding for each crowding measure and assessed the significance of the adjusted relative interquartile risk ratios. For equity measures, we tested their role as moderators of the crowding-quality models.

RESULTS

The asthma population included 927 patients. Timeliness and effectiveness quality measures showed an inverse, dose-related association with crowding, an effect not moderated by equity measures. Patients were 52% to 74% less likely to receive timely care and were 9% to 14% less likely to receive effective care when each crowding measure was at the 75th rather than at the 25th percentile (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

ED crowding is associated with decreased timeliness and effectiveness-but not equity-of care for children with acute asthma.