Clinical scoring does not accurately assess hypoxemia in pediatric asthma patients

Pediatric acute asthma scoring systems: a systematic review and survey of UK practice

BACKGROUND

Acute exacerbations of asthma are common in children. Multiple asthma severity scores exist, but current emergency department (ED) use of severity scores is not known.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to identify the parameters collected in pediatric asthma severity scores. A survey of Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI) sites was undertaken to ascertain routinely collected asthma data and information about severity scores. Included studies examined severity of asthma exacerbation in children 5-18 years of age with extractable severity parameters.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were eligible, containing 17 asthma severity scores. The severity scores assessed combinations of 15 different parameters (median, 6; range, 2-8). The most common parameters considered were expiratory wheeze (15/17), inspiratory wheeze (13/17), respiratory rate (10/17), and general accessory muscle use (9/17). Fifty-nine PERUKI centers responded to the questionnaire. Twenty centers (33.1%) currently assess severity, but few use a published score. The most commonly recorded routine data required for severity scores were oxygen saturations (59/59, 100%), heart rate, and respiratory rate (58/59, 98.3% for both). Among well-validated scores like the Pulmonary Index Score (PIS), Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PASS), Childhood Asthma Score (CAS), and the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM), only 6/59 (10.2%), 3/59 (5.1%), 1/59 (1.7%), and 0 (0%) of units respectively routinely collect the data required to calculate them.

CONCLUSION

Standardized published pediatric asthma severity scores are infrequently used. Improved routine data collection focusing on the key parameters common to multiple scores could improve this, facilitating research and audit of pediatric acute asthma.

Clinical respiratory scales: which one should we use?

INTRODUCTION

There are countless clinical respiratory scales for acute dyspnoea. Most healthcare professionals choose one based on previous personal experience or following local practice, unaware of the implications of their choice. The lack of critical comparisons between those different tools has been a widespread problem that only recently has begun to be addressed via score validation studies. Here we try to assess and compare the quality criteria of measurement properties of acute dyspnoea scores. Areas covered: A literature review was conducted by searching the PubMed database. Forty-five documents were deemed eligible as they reported the use or building of clinical scales, using at least two parameters, and applied these to an acute episode of respiratory dyspnoea. Our primary focus was the description of the validity, reliability and utility of 41 suitable scoring instruments. Differences in sample selection, study design, rater profiles and potential methodological shortcomings were also addressed. Expert commentary: All acute dyspnoea scores lack complete validation. In particular, the areas of measurement error and interpretability have not been addressed correctly by any of the tools reviewed. Frequent modification of pre-existing scores (in items composition and/or name), differences in study design and discrepancies in reviewed sources also hinder the search for an adequate tool.

Clinical Scores for Dyspnoea Severity in Children: A Prospective Validation Study

BACKGROUND

In acute dyspnoeic children, assessment of dyspnoea severity and treatment response is frequently based on clinical dyspnoea scores. Our study aim was to validate five commonly used paediatric dyspnoea scores.

METHODS

Fifty children aged 0-8 years with acute dyspnoea were clinically assessed before and after bronchodilator treatment, a subset of 27 children were videotaped and assessed twice by nine observers. The observers scored clinical signs necessary to calculate the Asthma Score (AS), Asthma Severity Score (ASS), Clinical Asthma Evaluation Score 2 (CAES-2), Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) and respiratory rate, accessory muscle use, decreased breath sounds (RAD).

RESULTS

A total of 1120 observations were used to assess fourteen measurement properties within domains of validity, reliability and utility. All five dyspnoea scores showed overall poor results, scoring insufficiently on more than half of the quality criteria for measurement properties. The AS and PRAM were the most valid with good values on six and moderate values on three properties. Poor results were mainly due to insufficient measurement properties in the validity and reliability domains whereas utility properties were moderate to good in all scores.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that commonly used dyspnoea scores show insufficient validity and reliability to allow for clinical use without caution.

Systematic review: insufficient validation of clinical scores for the assessment of acute dyspnoea in wheezing children

BACKGROUND

A reliable, valid, and easy-to-use assessment of the degree of wheeze-associated dyspnoea is important to provide individualised treatment for children with acute asthma, wheeze or bronchiolitis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess validity, reliability, and utility of all available paediatric dyspnoea scores.

METHODS

Systematic review. We searched Pubmed, Cochrane library, National Guideline Clearinghouse, Embase and Cinahl for eligible studies. We included studies describing the development or use of a score, assessing two or more clinical symptoms and signs, for the assessment of severity of dyspnoea in an acute episode of acute asthma, wheeze or bronchiolitis in children aged 0-18 years. We assessed validity, reliability and utility of the retrieved dyspnoea scores using 15 quality criteria.

RESULTS

We selected 60 articles describing 36 dyspnoea scores. Fourteen scores were judged unsuitable for clinical use, because of insufficient face validity, use of items unsuitable for children, difficult scoring system or because complex auscultative skills are needed, leaving 22 possibly useful scores. The median number of quality criteria that could be assessed was 7 (range 6-11). The median number of positively rated quality criteria was 3 (range 1-5). Although most scores were easy to use, important deficits were noted in all scores across the three methodological quality domains, in particular relating to reliability and responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

None of the many dyspnoea scores has been sufficiently validated to allow for clinically meaningful use in children with acute dyspnoea or wheeze. Proper validation of existing scores is warranted to allow paediatric professionals to make a well balanced decision on the use of the dyspnoea score most suitable for their specific purpose.

Correlation of clinical score to pulmonary function and oxygen saturation in children with asthma attack

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the importance of the relation between clinical score, pulse oximetry and spirometric tests in an asthma attack.

METHODS

In this randomized, double blind, observational study, 110 children (age 2-15 years) with an asthma attack who were admitted to emergency room were evaluated. Patient history, physical examination, clinical score and oxygen saturation were recorded in all patients; however pulmonary function tests were obtained only in 54 children who were over 5 years of age. The clinical score was derived from respiratory rate, wheezing, dyspnea and retractions.

RESULTS

Both oxygen saturation and spirometric tests were found to be significantly correlated with the clinical score in children.

CONCLUSION

The clinical score could be used for assessing the severity of the asthma attack particularly in developing countries where laboratory facilities are not available or pulmonary function tests are not feasible.

Evaluation of an asthma severity score

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate inter-observer agreement and validity of an asthma severity score derived from wheeze, heart rate and accessory muscle use components.

METHODOLOGY

Children with acute asthma were examined independently and simultaneously by two observers, followed by pulse oximetry and spirometry in those over 5 years with repeatable measurements.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement was very good (weighted kappa 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.00), the component with the best agreement being the accessory muscle score (0.76, 0.57 to 0.95). The score correlated significantly with oxygen saturation, heart rate, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). In a multivariate model, FEV1 was best related to accessory muscle use.

CONCLUSIONS

The asthma severity score has very good inter-observer agreement with a moderate relationship to oxygenation and FEV1.

Clinical scores for acute asthma in pre-school children. A review of the literature

The objective of this paper was to evaluate the applicability in research and clinical practice of clinical scores for acute asthma in pre-school children. All instruments were reviewed according to a standardized set of criteria: purpose of the score, suitability for use in children, inter-observer agreement, validity and responsiveness. A Medline literature research resulted in 16 different clinical asthma scores, which have been developed to assess the severity of acute asthma, to predict the outcome of an attack, or to evaluate the response to treatment. Most asthma scores could be easily obtained in children. Three scores have been modified to facilitate application in a younger age-category. Inter-observer agreement has received little attention, although all scores contained items that require subjective judgement. The predictive validity was insufficient to justify the application of clinical scores as a decision rule for the admission or discharge of children with acute asthma. Asthma scores seem to be useful for assessing the severity of an attack and evaluating the response to therapy, but as yet there is insufficient information on the performance of the scores to justify a preference. Wheezing and retractions appear to be important items of any useful score for acute asthma.

Pulse oximetry and peak flow as indicators of wheezing severity in children and improvement following bronchodilator treatments

This study examined the changes from the initial peak flows and oxygen saturations (OSAT) of wheezing children at presentation to the emergency department through their treatment in the emergency department. Data was collected prospectively on 785 patients 5 to 20 years of age during an 11-month period from November 1, 1990, to September 30, 1991. Both the initial OSAT and peak flows were correlated with the number of bronchodilator treatments required in the emergency department and with the need for hospitalization. Both the initial OSAT and the peak flows had a limited ability to predict the need for hospitalization. Oxygen saturation appears to be a valid measure of wheezing severity and is more easily obtained in children of all ages. Following bronchodilator treatment, peak flow results in a larger quantitative improvement than OSAT; however, this difference does not appear to have any significant advantage. Aerosolized albuterol and subcutaneous epinephrine resulted in a similar degree of improvement as measured by peak flow and by oxygen saturation, with clinically similar changes in heart rate.