Guidelines for discontinuing prehospital CPR in the emergency department--a review

The Current Discussion Regarding End-of-Life Care for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest with Initial Non-Shockable Rhythm: A Narrative Review

Despite recent advances in resuscitation science, outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with initial non-shockable rhythm remains poor. Those with initial non-shockable rhythm have some epidemiological features, including the proportion of patients with a witnessed arrest, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), age, and presumed etiology of cardiac arrest have been reported, which differ from those with initial shockable rhythm. The discussion regarding better end-of-life care for patients with OHCA is a major concern among citizens. As one of the efforts to avoid unwanted resuscitation, advance directive is recognized as a key intervention, safeguarding patient autonomy. However, several difficulties remain in enhancing the effective use of advance directives for patients with OHCA, including local regulation of their use, insufficient utilization of advance directives by emergency medical services at the scene, and a lack of established tools for discussing futility of resuscitation in advance care planning. In addition, prehospital termination of resuscitation is a common practice in many emergency medical service systems to assist clinicians in deciding whether to discontinue resuscitation. However, there are also several unresolved problems, including the feasibility of implementing the rules for several regions and potential missed survivors among candidates for prehospital termination of resuscitation. Further investigation to address these difficulties is warranted for better end-of-life care of patients with OHCA.

The predictive performance of current termination-of-resuscitation rules in patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Asian countries: A cross-sectional multicentre study

Background

Termination-of-resuscitation rules (TORRs) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients have been applied in western countries; in Asia, two TORRs were developed and have not been externally validated widely. We aimed to externally validate the TORRs using the registry of Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study (PAROS).

Methods

PAROS enrolled 66,780 OHCA patients in seven Asian countries from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2012. The American Heart Association-Basic Life Support and AHA-ALS (AHA-BLS), AHA-Advanced Life Support (AHA-ALS), Goto, and Shibahashi TORRs were selected. The diagnostic test characteristics and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. We further determined the most suitable TORR in Asia and analysed the variable differences between subgroups.

Results

We included 55,064 patients in the final analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and AUC, respectively, for AHA-BLS, AHA-ALS, Goto, Shibashi TORRs were 79.0%, 80.0%, 19.6%, 98.5%, and 0.80; 48.6%, 88.3%, 9.8%, 98.5%, and 0.60; 53.8%, 91.4%, 11.2%, 99.0%, and 0.73; and 35.0%, 94.2%, 8.4%, 99.0%, and 0.65. In countries using the Goto TORR with PPV<99%, OHCA patients were younger, had more males, a higher rate of shockable rhythm, witnessed collapse, pre-hospital defibrillation, and survival to discharge, compared with countries using the Goto TORR with PPV ≥99%.

Conclusions

There was no single TORR fit for all Asian countries. The Goto TORR can be considered the most suitable; however, a high predictive performance with PPV ≥99% was not achieved in three countries using it (Korea, Malaysia, and Taiwan).

The Reliability of Modified Termination of Resuscitation Rules after Arrival at the Emergency Department

Introduction

Pre-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) is not a usual practice in many cities. The current study aimed to examine the reliability of the modified basic life support (ED-BLS) and advanced life support (ED-ALS) rules for TOR after patient arrival at the emergency department (ED).

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest patients who received pre-hospital basic life support and defibrillator (BLS-D) mode of service in Taoyuan County in northern Taiwan during the study period were assessed. Data were retrieved from web-based registry records.

Results

Of the 1612 patients included, 40 (2.5%) achieved survival to discharge. The ED-ALS rule showed higher specificity (ED-ALS rule: 82.5% {95% confidence interval [CI]: 68.1-91.3} vs. ED-BLS rule: 50.0% {95%CI: 35.2-64.8}) and positive predictive value (ED-ALS rule: 99.0% {95% CI: 97.9-99.5} vs. ED-BLS rule: 98.6% {95%CI: 97.8-99.1}) than the ED-BLS rule in terms of predicting no survival to discharge after patient arrival at the ED. Among patients who fulfilled all criteria for the ED-BLS and ED-ALS rule, 20 (1.4%) and seven (1.0%) survived to discharge, respectively. Application of the ED-BLS and ED-ALS rules could have reduced further resuscitation efforts after arrival at the ED by 86.4% and 43.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

For non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients who receive BLS-D service, the ED-ALS rule has a higher specificity and PPV than the ED-BLS rule to predict no survival to discharge after patient arrival at the ED. Using the ED-ALS rule to terminate resuscitation after arrival at the ED should be prospectively validated. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2014;21:283-290)

Independent evaluation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical decision rule

OBJECTIVES

Recently, investigators described a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation (TOR) designed to help determine whether to terminate emergency medical services (EMS) resuscitative efforts for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OOHCA). The authors sought to evaluate the hypothesis that TOR would predict no survival for patients in an independent cohort of patients with OOHCA.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort analysis conducted in the state of Arizona. Consecutive, adult, OOHCA were prospectively evaluated from October 2004 through October 2006. A statewide OOHCA database utilizing Utstein-style reporting from 30 different EMS systems was used. Data were abstracted from EMS first care reports and hospital discharge records. The TOR guidelines predict that no survival to hospital discharge will occur if 1) an OOHCA victim does not have return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 2) no shocks are administered, and 3) the arrest is not witnessed by EMS personnel. Data were entered into a structured database. Continuous data are presented as means (+/-standard deviations [SD]) and categorical data as frequency of occurrence, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated as appropriate. The primary outcome measure was to determine if any cohort member who met TOR criteria survived to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

There were 2,239 eligible patients; the study group included 2,180 (97.4%) patients for whom the data were complete; mean age was 64 (+/-11) years, and 35% were female. The majority of patients in the study group met at least one or more of the TOR criteria. A total of 2,047 (93.8%) patients suffered from cardiac arrest that was unwitnessed by EMS; 1,653 (75.8%) had an unwitnessed arrest and no ROSC. With respect to TOR, 1,160 of 2,180 (53.2%) patients met all three criteria; only one (0.09%; 95% CI = 0% to 0.5%) survived to hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors evaluated TOR guidelines in an independent, statewide OOHCA database. The results are consistent with the findings of the TOR investigation and suggest that this algorithm is a promising tool for TOR decision-making in the field.

Transfer of care is associated with longer unsuccessful resuscitations

OBJECTIVE

Accepted guidelines define when to terminate unsuccessful resuscitations. We examined whether such resuscitations last longer for transported arrests in the field compared with those occurring in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who died in an urban, academic ED over 32 months starting from January 2001. Total length of resuscitation and the interval occurring in-ED were compared for arrests in the ED and transported arrests from the field.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients met the criteria, of whom 71 (53.8%) arrested in the field. Mean overall resuscitation times were longer for arrests occurring in the field (44 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], 39-48) compared with those in the ED (19 minutes; 95% CI, 16-22; P < .001). Mean resuscitation intervals occurring in the ED were no different for arrests occurring in the field (16 minutes; 95% CI, 13-19) than in the ED (19 minutes; 95% CI, 16-22; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Unsuccessful resuscitations were longer and beyond guideline recommendations when arrests occurred in the field and were transported. The interval of resuscitation that occurred in the ED was the same whether or not prehospital resuscitation occurred.

Inter-rater reliability and comfort in the application of a basic life support termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for out of hospital cardiac arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates inter-rater reliability and comfort of BLS providers with the application of an out-of-hospital Basic Life Support Termination of Resuscitation (BLS TOR) clinical prediction rule. This rule suggests that continued BLS cardiac resuscitation is futile and can be terminated in the field if the following three conditions are met: (1) no return of spontaneous circulation; (2) no shock given prior to transport; (3) cardiac arrest not witnessed by EMS personnel.

METHODS

Providers hypothetically applied the rule and rated their comfort level on a five-point Likert-type scale, from "very comfortable" to "very uncomfortable" during the prospective validation of a BLS TOR clinical prediction rule in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest conducted in 12 rural and urban communities [Morrison LJ, Visentin LM, Kiss A, et al. Validation of a rule for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. New Engl J Med 2006;355(5):478-87]. A Kappa score measured agreement between providers and compared to the correct interpretation of the rule.

RESULTS

We compared mean comfort levels of providers who interpreted the rule correctly versus incorrectly. Of 1240 enrolled cases, 1184 (95.5%) had paramedic attendant forms and 1211 (97.7%) had driver forms and 1175 (94.7%) had both. Kappa for interpretation agreement between driver and attendant was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92); between attendant and correct interpretation of the BLS TOR clinical prediction rule, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91); between driver and correct interpretation of the BLS TOR clinical prediction rule, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.85-0.91). For instances in which both providers applied the rule correctly (607/635 [95.6%]), the providers were significantly more comfortable (chi(2)(4)=30.5, p<0.0001) than those instances in which they did not (28/635 [4.4%].

CONCLUSIONS

The vast majority of providers were able to apply the BLS TOR clinical prediction rule correctly and were comfortable doing so. This suggests that both reliability and comfort will remain high during routine application of the rule when paramedics are well trained as users of the rule.

Resuscitation attempts in asystolic patients: The legal tail wagging the dog?

In today's litigious society, legal worries can cause Emergency practitioners to alter their delivery of clinical care. One clinical scenario in which this particularly true is in resuscitation of the so called "medically futile" patient. Patients who arrive to the Emergency Department in prolonged asystole have a uniformly dismal prognosis at best. Yet, many Emergency Physicians often continue resuscitative efforts for fear of being sued. These fears are largely unjustified. This article attempts to analyze the factors and elements involved in support of the assertion that the risk of a lawsuit is negligible at best.

Can we define patients with no chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether subgroups of patients with no chance of survival can be defined among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

PATIENTS

Patients in the Swedish cardiac arrest registry who fulfilled the following criteria were surveyed: cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was attempted; the arrest was not crew witnessed; and patients were found in a non-shockable rhythm.

SETTING

Various ambulance organisations in Sweden.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Among the 16,712 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, the following factors were independently associated with a lower chance of survival one month after cardiac arrest: no bystander CPR; non-witnessed cardiac arrest; cardiac arrest occurring at home; increasing interval between call for and arrival of the ambulance; and increasing age. When these factors were considered simultaneously two groups with no survivors were defined. In both groups patients were found in a non-shockable rhythm, no bystander CPR was attempted, the arrest was non-witnessed, the arrest took place at home. In one group the interval between call for and arrival of ambulance exceeded 12 minutes. In the other group patients were older than 80 years and the interval between call for and arrival of the ambulance exceeded eight minutes.

CONCLUSION

Among patients who had an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were found in a non-shockable rhythm the following factors were associated with a low chance of survival: no bystander CPR, non-witnessed cardiac arrest, the arrest took place at home, increasing interval between call for and arrival of ambulance, and increasing age. When these factors were considered simultaneously, groups with no survivors could be defined. In such groups the ambulance crew may refrain from starting CPR.

Recognition of death and termination of cardiac resuscitation attempts by UK ambulance personnel

OBJECTIVES

To identify whether the practice of the UK ambulance trusts comply with national recommendations with respect to when ambulance personnel are allowed to recognise death and/or terminate resuscitation attempts in the adult, normothermic, non-traumatic cardiac arrest.

METHODS

Questionnaire study of 39 ambulance trusts.

RESULTS

At the time of the study (summer 2000), 23 trusts operated separate policies for recognition of death and termination of resuscitation, two had policies for recognition of death alone, two had policies for termination of resuscitation alone, five operated a policy purely for termination of resuscitation attempts after a limited period of CPR, and seven had no protocols other than "the presence of rigor mortis, postmortem staining or injuries incompatible with life". Only eight trusts conformed to the protocols for both recognition of death and termination of resuscitation attempts recommended by the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC).

CONCLUSION

The JRCALC has proposed guidelines for recognition of death and terminating resuscitation attempts in the adult normothermic non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Despite this, there was still considerable variance in the practice of the UK ambulance trusts.

Decision making by emergency physicians when assessing cardiac arrest patients on arrival at hospital

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the factors which influence decision making by experienced emergency physicians when they decide whether to (a) pronounce 'life extinct' in adult patients with non traumatic cardiac arrest while in the ambulance, or (b) bring them into the resuscitation room in the Emergency Department for further assessment/management.

DESIGN

Qualitative study involving semi structured interviews and a focus group.

SETTING

Accident & Emergency (A&E) departments in the Yorkshire region.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifteen emergency physicians (two clinical fellows, nine specialist registrars and four consultants) working in the Yorkshire region.

RESULTS

Six main themes were identified that impacted upon the decision making process: the doctor's past experience, ambulance service issues, prehospital care, patient characteristics, presence and views of relatives, and organisational issues.

CONCLUSION

The reasoning behind decisions made when a patient arrives at the Emergency Department in cardiac arrest is multifactorial. Strict guidelines would be difficult to construct since individuals vary in the importance they attach to different factors.

Ethics seminars: case studies in "futility"-challenges for academic emergency medicine

The concept of "futility" and its determination in emergency medicine pose unique challenges to emergency physicians, patients, and society. The term "futility," although commonly used, is problematic in its scope, meaning, and interpretation. To bridge this gap in understanding, the authors suggest the construct of clinically nonbeneficial interventions (CNBI), instead of "futility. " This language better informs discussions of nonbeneficial interventions across the risk spectrum of emergency medical practice, while retaining the focus on the patient's interests. Two cases are presented, which underscore the need for prudence and empathetic communication when addressing issues of CNBI. Determinations of expected benefit should be based on established scientific evidence, and the goals and values of patients, not on individual biases regarding quality of life or other subjective matters. While physicians are under no ethical obligation to provide treatments that they judge have no realistic likelihood of clinical benefit, the context in which these determinations take place is of critical importance. When certain interventions are appropriately withheld, concerted efforts should be made to maintain effective communication, comfort, support, and counseling for patients, friends, and families. In all aspects of clinical decision making, the value of various interventions and therapies must be based on expected risks and benefits to the patients, first and foremost.

Ethical issues of resuscitation

There is a wide variety of ethical issues and dilemmas involving resuscitation, the act of restoring life to a patient in cardiorespiratory arrest. Decisions must be made rapidly and often must be based on suboptimal levels of information available at the time. Certain issues should be considered when one is making decisions in the resuscitation arena, including positive-aspects of resuscitation, not only the possibility of restoring life to the patient but also providing a sense of closure and resolution of guilt for the survivors. During and following resuscitative efforts, the psychologic and emotional well-being of the survivors should also be given close attention.

Implementation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation policy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the implementation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation policy in an urban EMS setting.

METHODS

A descriptive study characterizing the implementation of an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation policy in the Chicago EMS system. It includes a retrospective telemetry record review analyzing the utilization and compliance with the policy. The newly implemented policy involved field termination of resuscitation for all nontraumatic, adult cardiac arrest victims presenting in asystole who were not responsive to a standard trial of resuscitation.

RESULTS

Over the three-month study period, 228 resuscitations of adult, nontraumatic cardiac arrest victims were identified and submitted for review. The group of 142 cardiac arrest victims who presented in asystole and received resuscitative efforts were categorized into four groups. Group I included 34 cardiac arrests for which resuscitation was terminated in the field following policy criteria. Group II included eight cardiac arrests for which resuscitation was terminated but the patients did not meet criteria for termination of resuscitation. Group III included 84 cardiac arrests for which resuscitation was not terminated because the patients did not meet criteria for out-of-hospital termination. Group IV included 16 cardiac arrests for which resuscitative efforts were continued, although the patients met indications for field termination.

CONCLUSIONS

Field termination of resuscitation is practical in the setting of asystole unresponsive to aggressive resuscitative efforts. The implementation of such an out-of-hospital termination of resuscitation policy is complicated by many problems and is best accomplished by a gradual implementation process. Through this process all members of the EMS community can address practical and ethical issues and grow comfortable with the ongoing evolution of out-of-hospital therapy.

Ethical issues of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: current practice among emergency physicians

OBJECTIVE

To determine current practice and attitudes among emergency physicians (EPs) regarding the initiation and termination of CPR.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was mailed to randomly selected EPs. Main outcome measures included respondents' answers to questions regarding outcome of resuscitation, and current practice regarding initiation, continuation, and termination of resuscitation for victims of cardiopulmonary arrest.

RESULTS

The 1,252 respondents were from all 50 states, a variety of practice settings, and varying board certification. Most (78%) respondents honor legal advance directives regarding resuscitation. Few (7%) follow unofficial documents, or verbal reports of advance directives (6%). Many (62%) make decisions regarding resuscitation because of fear of litigation or criticism. A majority (55%) have recently attempted numerous resuscitations despite expectations that such efforts would be futile. Most respondents indicated that ideally, legal concerns should not influence physician practice regarding resuscitation (78%), but that in the current environment, legal concerns do influence practice (94%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most EPs attempt to resuscitate patients in cardiopulmonary arrest, regardless of futility, except in cases where a legal advance directive is available. Many EPs' decisions regarding resuscitation are based on concerns of litigation and criticism, rather than their professional judgment of medical benefit or futility. Compliance with patients' wishes regarding resuscitation is low unless a legal advance directive is present. Possible solutions to these problems may include standardized guidelines for the initiation and termination of CPR, tort reform, and additional public education regarding resuscitation and advance directives.

Continuation of CPR on admission to emergency department after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Occurrence, characteristics and outcome

AIM

To describe the occurrence, characteristics and outcome among patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who required continuation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on admission to the emergency department.

PATIENTS

all patients in the municipality of Göteborg who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, were reached by the emergency medical service (EMS) system and in whom CPR was initiated. Period for inclusion in study: 1 Oct. 1980-31 Dec. 1992.

RESULTS

of 334 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests, 2,319 (68%) were receiving on-going CPR at the time of admission to hospital. Of these, 137 patients (6%) were hospitalized alive and 28 (1.2%) could be discharged from hospital. Of these patients, 39% had a cerebral performance categories (CPC) score of 1 (no cerebral deficiency), 18% had a CPC score of 2 (moderate cerebral deficiency), 36% had a CPC score of 3 (severe cerebral deficiency) and 7% had a CPC score of 4 (coma) at discharge. Among patients discharged. 76% were alive after 1 year.

CONCLUSION

among consecutive patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, CPR was ongoing in 68% of them on admission to hospital. Among these patients, 6% were hospitalized alive and 1.2% were discharged from hospital. Thus, among patients with ongoing CPR on admission to hospital, survivors can be found but they are few in numbers and extensive cerebral damage is frequently present.

Family response to out-of-hospital death

OBJECTIVE

To better understand the perceptions, needs, and responses of family members after an out-of-hospital death.

METHODS

Over an 18-month period, phone interviews were conducted using a structured interview schedule modified from a similar study of survivors of in-hospital death. Subjects included 31 survivors of urban out-of-hospital deaths attended by paramedics from one ambulance company. Subjects were eligible if paramedics had arrived and death had been determined at the scene without transport. Survivors were interviewed 11 to 15 months after the death (mean = 12 months) to evaluate how well they coped with their loss, how they managed the experience of their loved ones' out-of-hospital deaths, and their feelings and beliefs about their loved ones' not being transported to a hospital.

RESULTS

None of the survivors believed their loved ones should have been transported to a hospital, and only one believed that something more could have been done for the individual. Although many of the survivors had suspected their loved ones had died, 64% had been informed of the death by emergency medical technicians (EMTs) or firefighters. Most thought the EMTs had informed them in a professional (81%) and gentle/supportive manner (74%). Some (29%) still had unanswered questions about the death, but most (58%) were adjusting well and no one had a "poor" adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In this small sample, survivors of out-of-hospital death were generally satisfied with the care their loved ones had received. None of the survivors believed their loved ones should have been transported to the hospital. They also believed the paramedics had been supportive and met their needs at the time of death. It appears that paramedics may be able to meet the needs of a patient's survivors by terminating out-of-hospital resuscitation efforts on the patient.

Trauma and nontrauma cardiopulmonary arrest: a national survey

INTRODUCTION

This survey attempts to identify the current standard of care for the air medical transport of the patient in cardiopulmonary arrest.

METHOD

An Association of Air Medical Services/National Flight Nurses Association-approved survey by a single mailing with an anonymous response.

SETTING

All rotor-craft programs with current memberships in AAMS.

RESULTS

Fifty-three of the 178 questionnaires mailed were returned. Program demographics, crew composition and transport volumes were typical of other reported national experiences. The majority of programs (84%) had standing operational protocols for trauma and non-trauma cardiopulmonary arrests. The indications for not initiating or discontinuing CPR, the transport of the patient in cardiopulmonary arrest, triage and financial considerations varied widely between air medical programs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides some insight on the current air medical management of the patient in cardiopulmonary arrest. National practice guidelines should be developed and tested prospectively in future studies.

Aeromedical evacuation of rural victims of nontraumatic cardiac arrest

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine if the deployment of a helicopter-borne nurse/paramedic team contributed to survival of victims of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in a rural setting.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A university hospital-based helicopter aeromedical program serving a primarily rural region with a volunteer basic life support/advanced life support ground emergency medical services system.

PARTICIPANTS

Victims of nontraumatic cardiac arrest, older than 15 years, in cardiac arrest at the time of request for air evacuation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were identified who met the study inclusion criteria between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1989. Basic life support care was always available before aeromedical crew arrival; advanced life support care was available in 58% of cases before helicopter arrival. Resuscitative efforts were terminated in the field in 55 cases; of 29 patients transported to the emergency department, only ten (12%) survived to hospital admission. Only one patient (1%) survived to hospital discharge; this patient was resuscitated by ground advanced life support providers before helicopter arrival.

CONCLUSION

Despite providing improved availability of advanced life support care in some cases, deployment of aeromedical teams had a negligible effect on patient survival from nontraumatic cardiac arrest in a rural setting.

Out-of-hospital resuscitation preferences of emergency health care workers

The objective of this study was to assess the personal preferences of emergency physicians, nurses, and medical technicians regarding their own potential out-of-hospital resuscitation. An anonymous multiitem survey instrument was used at a statewide emergency medicine educational conference. Emergency personnel who regularly treat out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients were enlisted to participate. Subjects picked the last intervention that they would wish for themselves in an optimally managed advanced cardiac life support (ACLS)-based resuscitation for ventricular fibrillation. One hundred millimeter visual analog scales were used to measure individual preferences for severe neurological disability or death. Hypothesis testing was by analysis of variance with Newman-Keuls, multiple regression with stepwise variable selection, and the chi 2 and binomial distributions. Of 185 survey instruments, 105 were returned completed by eligible subjects. There was little difference among the three occupational groups (P > .5), although older respondents favored shorter resuscitations (r = -.38; P = .002). Ten subjects did not want cardiopulmonary resuscitation started, and 65% wanted resuscitation stopped before the second dose of epinephrine. Only three subjects chose to undergo the entire ACLS sequence. Eighty-two percent of respondents preferred death to severe neurological disability. Emergency health care professionals have a unique personal awareness of issues surrounding out-of-hospital resuscitation. That a large majority would prefer death to severe disability and few would willingly undergo full resuscitation as currently practiced suggests that prevailing guidelines should be reevaluated.

Criteria for dead-on-arrivals, prehospital termination of CPR, and do-not-resuscitate orders

In contrast to the current consensus that governs the mechanics of prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), uniform criteria for determining when to initiate, withhold, or terminate ACLS in the field do not exist. Most emergency medical services (EMS) permit paramedics and other prehospital providers to withhold resuscitation when the victim obviously is dead, but the accuracy and appropriateness of this judgement in the field have not been subjected to empiric research. Do-not-resuscitate orders on patients in community settings often are problematic when paramedics and other prehospital providers are governed by standing orders that require them to initiate CPR when it is indicated medically. To date, eight states and a number of local EMS systems have developed a variety of policies to address this dilemma. Currently, few services permit paramedics to terminate ACLS in the field when such efforts fail to achieve return of spontaneous circulation. Studies have demonstrated convincingly that the rapid transport of such patients for further attempts at resuscitation in the hospital yields dismal rates of survival. The costs, risks, and benefits of this practice in community settings must be reviewed carefully to allocate EMS resources in an optimal manner.

Comparison of standard and high-dose adrenaline in the resuscitation of asystole and electromechanical dissociation

Sixty-eight adults with cardiac arrest (asystole and electromechanical dissociation) were randomly allocated for treatment with standard (1 mg) or high-dose epinephrine (5 mg). If the first dose of adrenaline (1 or 5 mg) failed, standardized advanced life-support was applied in all cases. High-dose adrenaline was associated with higher initial resuscitation success rates (16 of 28) than standard-dose adrenaline (6 of 40), whereas hospital discharge rates were not significantly different between the groups. Blood pressure was significantly higher in the high-dose adrenaline group in comparison to the standard dose at 1 and 5 min after resuscitation. Although high-dose adrenaline appears to improve cardiac resuscitation success, the duration of global cerebral ischaemia seems to determine the ultimate outcome.

Initiation of resuscitation in patients with prehospital bradyasystolic cardiac arrest in Helsinki

The factors influencing the decision to initiate resuscitation in prehospital cardiac arrest patients encountered in bradyasystole due to presumed heart disease were studied. For this purpose, the characteristics and circumstances of arrest of the patients encountered in asystole and electromechanical dissociation, seen by a physician-staffed prehospital emergency care unit in a tiered emergency medical system, were reviewed. During the study period, resuscitation was initiated in 83 bradyasytolic patients. The characteristics of these patients were compared with those of 72 patients in asystole or electromechanical dissociation declared dead on the scene without resuscitation. The presence of EMD was the most important factor influencing the decision to resuscitate (P less than 0.001), even if the arrest was unwitnessed, while the patient's age was of less importance. For the patients with a witnessed arrest, the delay before treatment was initiated also affected the decision. Successful resuscitation and survival of the patients was similar to earlier reports. The results provide guidelines in the decision making of initiation of resuscitation when developing our emergency care system into one with non-physicians as advanced life support providers.

Is emergency department resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims who arrive pulseless worthwhile?

It is still a common practice to continue unsuccessful field resuscitations in the emergency department (ED) even after prolonged estimated down times. The authors studied patients who arrested in the field and did not regain a pulse before their arrival in the ED to determine if any ever leave the hospital neurologically intact. All cardiac arrests in the urban St Louis area that were brought to our facility over a 2 1/2-year period by advanced life support units (excluding all patients with hypothermia, drug overdose, near drowning, and traumatic cardiac arrest) were reviewed. Of 243 such patients 32 (13%) arrived with a pulse. Twenty-three of these patients were admitted and 10 discharged alive, 7 were neurologically intact. Out of 211 patients who arrived without a pulse, 24 (11%) developed a pulse with further resuscitative efforts in the ED. Eighteen of these patients were admitted but only one was discharged neurologically intact. The only survivor in the group without a pulse arrested while en route to the ED. It is concluded that cardiac arrest victims who arrive in the ED without a pulse on arrival or en route have almost no chance of functional recovery.

Outcomes in unsuccessful field resuscitation attempts

To determine the outcomes of patients who did not regain vital signs after prehospital advanced cardiac life support, we studied adult patients who sustained nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Our study consisted of a 20-month retrospective review of 244 charts beginning January 1986. Twelve patients were excluded for drug overdose, family request, or unavailable data. Of the remaining 232 patients, 51 had a rhythm and pulse on arrival at the emergency department. The record of each of the remaining 181 patients was analyzed for age, sex, location, witness, CPR initiator, advanced life support unit response time, initial field rhythm, and initial ECG rhythm. Outcome alternatives were dead in emergency department or hospital admission. All hospitalized patients were further evaluated for survival to discharge and neurologic status at discharge. Ten of the 181 patients (6%) who failed prehospital resuscitation survived to hospitalization, and one (0.6%) was discharged neurologically intact. Survival to hospital admission did not correlate with any of the variables studied except gender. The one patient who survived a failed prehospital resuscitation was not endotracheally intubated in the field. Our data support the practice of pronouncing adult nontraumatic cardiac arrest victims who fail to respond to advanced cardiac life support efforts in the field as dead at the scene.

Decision making to cease or to continue cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Cerebral Resuscitation Study Group

CPR should be initiated in any patient who has a cardiac arrest. This might improve overall outcome but implies that CPR is started in patients without any virtual chance for long-term survival (LTS). The aim of this study is, by analysing retrospectively 2713 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (CA), to identify indices which might be of help in the decision making to continue or to discontinue CPR. In an important number of unsuccessful CPR attempts ALS-time did not exceed 20 min. This occurred more frequently in subgroups where limited chances of LTS are expected on clinical grounds. The decision to cease CPR might have been based on other clinical and/or ethical parameters which were not recorded in the registry. This behavior results in a "self-fulfilling prophecy". A subset of patients with limited chances for LTS (0/405) can be identified: patients in electromechanical dissociation (EMD) or asystole on arrival of the mobile intensive care unit (MICU) team, without pupil reaction to light during CPR and with inefficient cardiac massage by the MICU (405/2713). Other patients in EMD or asystole without pupil reaction to light during CPR (1373/2713) but with efficient ECC should be resuscitated for more than 30 min, especially if the patient is gasping during CPR (LTS 27/1373). Patients in EMD or asystole on arrival of the MICU with pupil reaction to light during CPR (236/2713) should have an ALS-time of at least 45 min (LTS 42/236). Cardiac arrests in ventricular fibrillation (VF) (699/2713) should be resuscitated for at least 45 min, especially when gasping during CPR (LTS 119/699).

In-hospital resuscitation following unsuccessful prehospital advanced cardiac life support: 'heroic efforts' or an exercise in futility?

From our emergency department logbook we identified 281 consecutive patients transported to the Regional Medical Center at Memphis following failed prehospital advanced cardiac life support (ACLS). Medical records were obtained for 240 cases (85.4%). Initial cardiac rhythms in the ED included ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (29%), electromechanical dissociation (18%), and asystole (51%). Thirty-two patients (13.3%) were successfully resuscitated in the ED, but only four (1.7%) survived to hospital discharge. Two patients had good neurologic outcomes; both degenerated to cardiac arrest shortly prior to arrival in the ED. The remaining two survivors were discharged to nursing homes with severe neurologic deficits. Of the 41 cases for whom no medical records could be found, 39 were noted in our logbook to have died in the ED. No record of subsequent hospital admission could be found for the other two. Both are presumed to have died. Failure to respond to prehospital ACLS predicts nonsurvival and may warrant cessation of efforts in the field. Future programs and research efforts in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest should be focused on optimal provision of prehospital care prior to the onset of irreversible deterioration.

In-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: prospective survey of management and outcome

A sixteen-month prospective survey of in-hospital cardiac arrests indicated that of 168 patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 27 (16%) survived to leave hospital. Ninety-three per cent of these patients were ambulant and 81% were able to care for themselves. Poorest outcome was associated with initial rhythm of asystole, prolonged resuscitation and arrest in the Intensive Care Units. When compared with recent and past literature, these figures suggest that the incidence of successful outcome for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in hospitals has not changed significantly over the past twenty years.