Effect of technique of administration on plasma lidocaine levels

Should vasopressin replace adrenaline for endotracheal drug administration?

OBJECTIVE

Arginine vasopressin was established recently as a drug of choice in the treatment of cardiac arrest and in retractable ventricular fibrillation; however, the hemodynamic effect of vasopressin following endotracheal drug administration has not been fully elucidated. We compared the effects of endotracheally administered vasopressin vs. adrenaline on hemodynamic variables in a canine model, and we investigated whether vasopressin produces the same deleterious immediate blood pressure decrease as did endotracheal adrenaline in the canine model.

DESIGN

Prospective controlled study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory in Tel-Aviv University, Israel.

SUBJECTS

Five adult mongrel dogs weighing 6.5-20 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

Dogs were anesthetized; each dog was intubated orally, and both femoral arteries were cannulated for the measurement of arterial pressure and for sampling blood gases. Each dog was studied four times, 1 wk apart, by using the same protocol for injection and anesthesia: endotracheal placebo (10 mL NaCl 0.9%,), endotracheal vasopressin (1 units/kg), endobronchial adrenaline (0.1 mg/kg), and endotracheal adrenaline (0.1 mg/kg). Following placebo, vasopressin, and adrenaline instillation, five forced manual ventilations were delivered with an Ambu bag. Each dog was its own control.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Following placebo or drug administration, heart electrocardiography and arterial pressures were continuously monitored with a polygraph recorder for 1 hr. Endotracheal vasopressin produced an immediate increase of diastolic blood pressure (from 83 +/- 10 mm Hg [baseline] to 110 +/- 5 mm Hg at 1 min postinjection). This response lasted >1 hr. In contrast, both endotracheal and endobronchial administration of adrenaline produced an early and significant (p <.05) decrease in diastolic and mean blood pressures. The diastolic blood pressure increase from 85 +/- 10 mm Hg to 110 +/- 10 mm Hg took an ill-afforded 55 secs following endotracheal adrenaline. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly (p <.05) higher following vasopressin compared with adrenaline administration in both routes.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasopressin accomplishes its hemodynamic effect, particularly on diastolic blood pressure, more rapidly, vigorously, and protractedly and to a significant degree compared with both endotracheal and endobronchial adrenaline. Evaluation of the effects of endotracheal vasopressin in a closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation model is recommended.

Hemodynamic effects of tracheal administration of vasopressin in dogs

BACKGROUND

Intravenous administration of vasopressin during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be more effective than optimal doses of epinephrine. Earlier studies had been performed on a porcine model, but pigs produce lysine vasopressin hormone, while humans and dogs do not. This study was designed to compare the effects of tracheal vasopressin with those of NaCl 0.9% (placebo) on haemodynamic variables in a dog model.

METHODS

Five dogs were allocated to receive either vasopressin 1.2 U/kg or placebo (10 ml of NaCl 0.9%) via the tracheal route after being anesthetized and ventilated. Haemodynamic variables were determined and arterial blood gases were measured.

RESULTS

All animals of the vasopressin group demonstrated a significant increase of the systolic (from 135+/-7 to 165+/-6 mmHg, P<0.05), diastolic (from 85+/-10 to 110+/-10 mmHg, P<0.05) and mean blood pressure (from 98.5+/-3 to 142.2+/-5, P<0.05). Blood pressure rose rapidly and lasted for more than an hour (plateau effect). Heart rate decreased significantly following vasopressin (from 54+/-9 to 40+/-5 beats per min, P<0.05) but not in the placebo group. These changes were not demonstrated with placebo injection.

CONCLUSION

Tracheal administration of vasopressin was followed by significantly higher diastolic, systolic and mean blood pressures in the vasopressin group compared with the placebo group. Blood gases remained unchanged in both groups. Vasopressin administered via the trachea may be an acceptable alternative for vasopressor administration during CPR, when intravenous access is delayed or not available, however, further investigation is necessary.

Plasma epinephrine levels after epinephrine administration using different tracheal administration techniques in an adult CPR porcine model

The aim of the study was to compare arterial plasma epinephrine levels after tracheal epinephrine application using three different tracheal instillation techniques at different tracheal levels in a porcine adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation model. In the prospective, randomized study, electrically-induced cardiopulmonary arrest was applied to 32 anaesthetized and paralyzed domestic pigs. After 3 min of cardiopulmonary arrest and 2 min of external chest compressions using a pneumatic compression device and mechanical ventilation, epinephrine was administered intravenously (20 microg/kg) or tracheally (50 microg/kg): using either direct injection into the upper end of the tracheal tube, via a catheter placed into the bronchial system and using a special tracheal application tube. In each group, there were eight pigs. Arterial blood samples were taken before and up to 10 min after epinephrine administration. Regression analysis was performed of the correlated data. The values of mean arterial blood pressure and end-tidal CO(2) during the time of observation did not differ between groups. Total plasma epinephrine concentrations showed a significant increase in all groups, but with no difference between the tracheal groups. However, peak epinephrine levels in the intravenous group were significantly higher than in tracheal groups. We conclude that administration using three different tracheal instillation levels result in similar onset and peak plasma epinephrine levels in this setting and therefore the preferred method of tracheal epinephrine application for cardiopulmonary resuscitation may be selected by other criteria.

The time required to perform different methods for endotracheal drug administration during CPR

We compared the times necessary to perform different endotracheal drug application techniques during CPR. In a simulated CPR situation with a mannequin 28 paramedics and seven emergency physicians performed different drug instillation techniques in a randomized manner: direct injection into the upper end of the endotracheal tube (group tube), via a suction catheter placed into the bronchial system (group suction catheter), via a flexible venous catheter placed into the bronchial system (group venous catheter), using an EDGAR tube (an endotracheal tube with an injection channel within the wall of the tube (group EDGAR). We measured the time necessary to prepare the drug solution and compared the time necessary to prepare and perform each instillation method and the time the ventilation was interrupted. Comparison between groups was performed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. It took significantly longer to perform the more complicated techniques using suction catheters (26; 18 54 s) and venous catheters (30; 22-50 s) compared to the other two groups (median; min-max) (p < 0.05). No differences concerning the application time were found between the group tube (7; 5 14 s) and group EDGAR (8; 5-13 s). The time of interruption of chest compression's and ventilation: group suction tube (11; 5-19 s) and group catheter (12; 6-18 s) was significant longer than in group tube (5; 2-9 s) (p < 0.05). In group EDGAR the connection ventilator-tube remained intact due to its concept of drug application. The use of special devices such as suction catheters or venous catheters for endotracheal instillation during CPR results in significantly longer preparation and instillation times with a longer interruption of the oxygen supply and chest compression's.

Plasma catecholamine levels following tracheal and intravenous epinephrine administration in swine

We compared plasma epinephrine levels after three different tracheal epinephrine application techniques and intravenous injection in male and female anesthetized and paralyzed domestic pigs. Epinephrine was administered intravenously (10 microg/kg) (group i.v.) or tracheally (100 microg/kg) either by direct injection into the upper end of the tracheal tube (group Tube), via a suction tube placed into the bronchial system (group Catheter) or using an EDGAR tube (group EDGAR), each group: n = 8. Arterial plasma samples were drawn before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10 min after epinephrine administration. Plasma concentrations of epinephrine were measured with high pressure liquid chromatography using electrochemical detection. Analysis was performed by regression analysis for correlated data. Total plasma epinephrine concentrations showed a significant increase within 0.5 min in all groups. However, peak plasma epinephrine levels in group i.v. were significantly higher than in tracheal groups, while no differences between tracheal groups over the time were found. We conclude that in swine with spontaneous circulation tracheal instillation techniques using special devices such as suction tubes or EDGAR tubes result in onset and peak plasma epinephrine levels equivalent to those after direct injection into the upper end of the tracheal tube.

The impact of an endotracheal side port on the absorption of lidocaine

OBJECTIVE

To compare lidocaine levels after administration through an i.v. line, a standard endotracheal (ET) tube, and an ET tube side port (ETSP) designed for medication administration.

METHODS

A double-blind, prospective, triple crossover canine study was performed. Seventeen anesthetized mongrel dogs were given standard doses of 2% lidocaine via i.v. (1.5 mg/kg), endotracheally through the main lumen (3 mg/kg diluted in 10 mL normal saline), and endotracheally through the modified side port (3 mg/ kg diluted in 10 mL normal saline). Arterial blood gases (ABGs) and plasma lidocaine levels were measured at time 0, 30 sec, 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 30 min, and 60 min. Mean lidocaine levels across time, comparing the 3 methods of administration, were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. The main outcome was the comparison of mean ET and ETSP lidocaine levels at each time point using paired t-tests. The attainment and duration of lidocaine levels considered therapeutic in cardiac arrest (1.4 micrograms/mL) were described. ABGs were measured at each point to describe trends in oxygenation.

RESULTS

Mean lidocaine levels, comparing the 3 methods of administration, were significantly different at all time points except time 0. The ETSP levels were significantly lower than the ET main-lumen levels at 30 sec, 1 min, 5 min, and 10 min. i.v.-administered lidocaine attained quick therapeutic levels and revealed faster elimination. Lidocaine administered through the ET main lumen reached therapeutic levels more slowly, and maintained such levels longer. Lidocaine administered through the ETSP never reached therapeutic levels. Mean PO2S remained > 340 torr throughout each method of administration.

CONCLUSION

This nonarrest canine model suggests that lidocaine levels achieved through an ETSP are lower than levels obtained with the same drug dose via an ET main lumen. Therapeutic lidocaine levels are obtainable by i.v. or ET main-lumen routes, but not via this ETSP.

Epinephrine pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics following endotracheal administration in dogs: the role of volume of diluent

OBJECTIVE

to define the optimal volume of dilution for endotracheal(ET) administration of epinephrine (EPI).

DESIGN

prospective, randomized, laboratory comparison of four different volumes of dilution of endotracheal epinephrine (1, 2, 5, and 10 ml of normal saline).

SETTING

large animal research facility of a university medical center.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

epinephrine (0.02 mg/kg) diluted with four different volumes (1, 2, 5, and 10 ml) of normal saline was injected into the ET tube of five anesthetized dogs. Each dog served as its own control and received all four volumes in different sequences at least 1 week apart. Arterial blood samples for plasma epinephrine concentration and blood gases were collected before and 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 60 min after drug administration. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were continuously monitored with a polygraph recorder.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

higher volumes of diluent (5 and 10 ml) caused a significant decrease of PaO2, from 147 +/- 8 to 106 +/- 10 torr, compared with the lower volumes of diluent (1 and 2 ml), from 136 +/- 10 to 135 +/- 7 torr (P < 0.05). These effects persisted for over 30 min. Mean plasma epinephrine concentrations significantly increased within 15 s following administration for all the volumes of diluent. Mean plasma epinephrine concentrations, maximal epinephrine concentration (Cmax) and the coefficient of absorption (Ka) were higher in the 5 and 10 ml groups. The time interval to reach maximal concentration (Tmax) was shorter in the 5 and 10 ml groups. Yet these results were not significantly different. Heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures did not differ significantly between the groups throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Dilution of endotracheal epinephrine into a 5 ml volume with saline optimizes drug uptake and delivery without adversely affecting oxygenation and ventilation.

Intratracheal administration of fentanyl: pharmacokinetics and local tissue effects

OBJECTIVE

To study the pharmacokinetics and local tissue effects resulting from the intratracheal administration of preservative-free fentanyl.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, blinded and controlled animal study.

SETTING

University research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Eighteen adult male New Zealand rabbits.

INTERVENTIONS

Preservative-free fentanyl citrate or normal saline was administered by the intratracheal (i.t.) and intravenous (i.v.) routes to randomized groups of rabbits. The animals were killed at 24, 48 and 72 h following administration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of fentanyl were measured before administration and at 2, 5, 10, 30, 60 and 120 min following administration by a specific radioimmunoassay. A detailed histological examination of the lung and tracheal tissue was performed to identify local side effects. There were no significant differences in the plasma fentanyl concentrations resulting from the i.v. or i.t. route of administration. In both groups, the concentrations of fentanyl were within the therapeutic range (i.t. 2.37 ng/ml, i.v. 2.53 ng/ml) by 2 min after injection and reached a maximum concentration within 5 min. The bioavailability of i.t. fentanyl was 71%. Microscopic examination of the respiratory system did not show significant differences between the two random groups overall. However, in the sub-group of animals killed at 24 h, more animals in the i.t. group showed signs of inflammation in the lung parenchyma.

CONCLUSIONS

There is rapid absorption of fentanyl following i.t. administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters for fentanyl were not significantly altered by the route of administration. Although there were no signs that i.t. administration of preservative-free fentanyl produces lung injury, a transient and mild inflammatory response was detected at 24 h after administration.

Mastering pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Premature and unexpected death, especially in children, is tragic and very unacceptable. Effective treatments for sudden death of pediatric patients continue to emerge. Modern cardiopulmonary resuscitation function began with the widespread introduction of closed-chest cardiac massage in 1960; however, despite 35 years of research and refinement, more than 90% of children who receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation do not survive. This article summarizes and expands on current treatment concepts for pediatric sudden death. Emphasis is placed on procedures and techniques that likely are accessible in most medical centers caring for critically ill and injured children.

Emergency alternatives to intravenous access. Intraosseous, intratracheal, sublingual, and other-site drug administration

Difficulties and delays in establishing intravenous access are not uncommon in emergency situations in pediatrics. Alternatives to venous cannulation exist, including intraosseous access, intratracheal drug administration, sublingual and intralingual injection, the intrapenile route, and intracardiac injection. Each of these emergency alternatives to intravenous access is discussed from the historical, technical, utilitarian, and risk-benefit aspects. It is concluded that the intraosseous effective alternative to intravenous access in emergency situations.

Pharmacologic controversies in CPR

Since the 1985 Emergency Cardiac Care Conference, numerous controversies about the pharmacology of CPR have arisen (eg, questions about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs during CPR, the optimal vehicle for delivery of medications, and the dose of atropine in brady-asystolic cardiac arrest). This article has three objectives: 1) to critically explore these controversies, 2) to provide recommendations for clinical practice, and 3) to identify areas for future study. The ideal route is one which combines rapid access with quick delivery of drug to the central circulation. Because of hemodynamic changes during CPR, administration of drugs into the central circulation is preferable when compared with peripheral venous injection. Whenever drugs are administered from a peripheral i.v. site, the extremity should be elevated, and a 20-mL bolus of i.v. fluid should be given to facilitate access of the agent to the central circulation. If there is a delay in obtaining venous access, epinephrine, lidocaine, and atropine may be administered through the endotracheal tube at 2.5 times the i.v. dose. When administering these drugs through the endotracheal tube, dilute the drug in 10 mL of saline or water and inject it through a long catheter beyond the tip of the endotracheal tube. Dextrose 5% water is the primary vehicle for drug delivery during CPR. However, the administration of glucose during CPR is controversial because of the potentially detrimental effects of hyperglycemia on neuronal function during periods of ischemia. Data are inconclusive regarding the effects of glucose levels on neurologic outcome following resuscitation. Hyperglycemia may be a marker for prolonged resuscitation with subsequent impairment in insulin release.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pediatric resuscitation pharmacology. Members of the Medications in Pediatric Resuscitation Panel

The goal of resuscitation pharmacology is to restart the heart as quickly as possible while preserving vital organ function during chest compression. Unfortunately, the application of advanced life support to pediatric cardiac arrest patients is often unsuccessful. The goal of this paper is to review the scientific rationale and educational considerations used to derive the guidelines for medication use in the pediatric patient during CPR. The first step in drug delivery during CPR is to achieve vascular access. The endotracheal route and intraosseous route may be used, although the former is not reliable. To maximize endotracheal drug effect, a larger dose should be instilled into the airway as deeply as possible. Any vascular access, including intraosseous, is preferable to endotracheal drug administration. Although other alpha-adrenergic agents are theoretically superior, epinephrine remains the drug of choice in pediatric resuscitation. The previously recommended dose, however, may be inadequate; a dose 10 to 20 times larger (100-200 micrograms/kg) should be considered, particularly if the standard dose is ineffective. Lacking convincing data, the indications and dose for calcium are unchanged. Similarly, there are no data advocating a change in the indications or dose for lidocaine, bretylium, or atropine. The treatment of arrest-induced acidosis remains controversial. The mainstay of therapy consists of efforts to maximize oxygenation and tissue perfusion. Bicarbonate is not a first-line drug; its use should be considered when the patient fails to respond to advanced life support efforts, including the administration of high-dose epinephrine. Bicarbonate may be helpful in the postresuscitation setting, but its use should not supplant efforts to maximize tissue perfusion. Adenosine is an effective and generally safe medication for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia in infants and children. Therefore, its indications, dose, and toxicities should be included in the new guidelines. Finally, a summary of research initiatives are included, including a call for the development of a multi-institutional pediatric clinical resuscitation research group. Large numbers of patients must be enrolled in a standardized manner to better evaluate the benefits and adverse effects of various therapies. This includes the use of high-dose epinephrine, calcium, bicarbonate, and other buffer agents such as Carbicarb and THAM. Animal models simulating the etiology and pathophysiology of pediatric arrest also are needed. In both clinical and animal studies, neurologic outcome and long-term survival should be assessed rather than simply the rate of restoration of spontaneous circulation.

Differences in plasma lidocaine levels with endotracheal drug therapy secondary to total volume of diluent administered

Endotracheal drug therapy provides an effective alternative method for the administration of drugs in the numerous clinical settings in which intravenous access is difficult or impossible to obtain. However, the specific factors affecting endotracheal drug absorption and thus, the drug's plasma levels and effectiveness, has not yet been fully determined. Lidocaine alone or lidocaine mixed with normal saline was given endotracheally in four volumes (Volume I = undiluted with less than or equal to 5.5 cc total volume; Volume II = diluted to 6 cc total volume; Volume III = diluted to 12 cc total volume; Volume IV = diluted to 25 cc total volume) by the same technique of administration and in the same dosage of 4 mg/kg. Each dog served as its own control and received all four volumes of endotracheal lidocaine on different occasions. Plasma lidocaine levels at all four volumes and at all four time periods (5, 15, 30 and 60 min after giving endotracheal lidocaine) were obtained in each of the six dogs for a total of 96 plasma lidocaine levels measured in the study. Mean plasma lidocaine levels (micrograms/ml) at 5 min were: Volume I = 1.9, Volume II = 10.0, Volume III = 3.2 and Volume IV, = 4.3. These results were highly significant (P less than 0.001). The highest plasma lidocaine levels were obtained in the diluted volume, Volume II and the lowest plasma lidocaine levels in the undiluted volume, Volume I, with Volumes III and IV being intermediate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Endobronchial drug administration: does deep endobronchial delivery have advantages in comparison with simple injection through the endotracheal tube?

Endobronchial administration of drugs is a valuable alternative to intravenous delivery when venous access cannot be established quickly enough. Some authors propose that deep endobronchial administration through a catheter or similar auxiliary device should give better absorption than simple injection through the endotracheal tube. To test this proposal in the present study two groups of each 6 patients during general anesthesia were administered 3 ml aqueous lidocaine solution at a dose of 2 mg/kg, either deep endobronchially through a catheter or simply through the endotracheal tube. The unusually low volume of administration of 3 ml was chosen because it was thought that the advantages of deep endobronchial administration would then be particularly apparent as 3 ml would lead to a more localized deposit with deep endobronchial administration thus being clearly different from simple injection. No difference in the PaO2 between the two groups could be statistically established. However, the mean lidocaine plasma concentration in the group with the deep endobronchially administered drug was in tendency lower than in the control group (P less than 0.05 at 5 min after delivery). Presumably because of the low volume of administration the mean lidocaine plasma concentrations in both groups always remained under the therapeutic level of at least 1.5 micrograms/ml. Thus, at least for small volumes and stable circulation the results after deep endobronchial administration through a catheter were somewhat worse than after simple injection through the endotracheal tube.

Effect of hypoxemia on pharmacokinetics of endotracheal lidocaine in dogs

Endotracheal administration is an effective alternative method for giving drugs in the many clinical situations in which it is difficult or impossible to quickly obtain an intravenous line. Yet whether various clinical conditions such as hypoxemia have any effect on endotracheal drug therapy is not known. Sixteen sets of plasma lidocaine levels were measured at 5, 15, 30, and 60 min after endotracheal lidocaine administration in eight dogs. Each dog was given the same dose of endotracheal lidocaine by the same technique of administration while in both a normal control state (Group I = 'Non-hypoxemia', mean Po2 = 98) and during hypoxemia (Group II = "Hypoxemia", mean Po2 = 36). Significantly higher plasma lidocaine levels occurred in the hypoxemic state (Group II) at time = 5 min while there was no significant difference in plasma lidocaine levels at time = 15, 30, and 60 min. Mean plasma lidocaine levels (micrograms/ml) at 5 min were: Group I = 1.38, Group II = 2.36 (significant at P less than 0.05). Plasma lidocaine levels were: Group I = 1.61 vs. Group II = 1.63 at time = 15 min, Group I = 1.11 vs. Group II = 1.10 at time = 30 min, and Group I = 0.54 vs. Group II = 0.51 at time = 60 min. Thus, there was a higher peak plasma lidocaine level and a shorter time to peak plasma lidocaine levels in the hypoxemic dogs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Plasma lidocaine levels occurring with endotracheal administration during hemorrhagic shock

During the many emergency situations in which venous access is difficult or impossible, endotracheal drug administration is an effective alternative means of delivering life-saving medications. Shock is a commonly encountered emergency situation in which endotracheal drug therapy can and is often used. Yet whether a drug given endotracheally during shock can be absorbed from the lungs and pass into the bloodstream is not known. Forty-five sets of plasma lidocaine levels drawn at 5, 15, 30 and 60 min after the administration of endotracheal lidocaine at a dose of 2 or 4 mg/kg were obtained in dogs either in shock or in a normal control group: Group I = "Non-shock" or normal control, N = 27; Group II = "Shock", N = 18. Significantly higher plasma lidocaine levels occurred in the shock group in all time periods and with either dose of lidocaine (P less than 0.001). Mean plasma lidocaine levels (micrograms/ml) at 5 min were: (at 2 mg/kg dose) Group I = 1.1, Group II = 2.0; and (at 4 mg/kg dose) Group I = 2.3, and Group II = 5.1. The dose of lidocaine, the technique of administration, and the time at which the plasma lidocaine level was drawn as well as whether shock vs. non-shock was present were all highly significant factors (P less than 0.001) in determining plasma lidocaine levels. In summary: (1) endotracheal lidocaine is absorbed during shock and (2) higher plasma lidocaine levels occur during shock than during the non-shock control state. This suggests that the dosage of endotracheal medication may need to be adjusted for various clinical conditions such as shock.

The effect of dilution on plasma lidocaine levels with endotracheal administration

In the many emergency situations in which it is difficult or impossible to obtain venous access rapidly endotracheal drug therapy can be effective and life saving. Yet relatively little is known about endotracheal drug therapy. Plasma lidocaine levels were measured in 23 dogs after the administration of endotracheal lidocaine at a dose of 2 or 4 mg/kg. Endotracheal lidocaine was given either as a dilution with normal saline (1:1 dilution) or undiluted (Group 1, no dilution; Group 2, dilution). Significantly higher plasma lidocaine levels occurred with the dilution group in all the time periods and with either dose of lidocaine (2 or 4 mg/kg) (P less than .001). Mean plasma lidocaine levels (microgram/mL) at five minutes were: (at 2 mg/kg dose) Group 1, 0.64; Group 2, 3.4; and (at 4 mg/kg dose) Group 1, 1.9, Group 2, 4.7 (P less than .001). Arterial blood gases were not significantly different before or after endotracheal drug administration. This study suggests that higher plasma lidocaine levels are achieved and maintained longer when diluted with normal saline than when given undiluted; and higher plasma lidocaine levels can be obtained by dilution without any detrimental effect on respiratory function as measured by arterial blood gases.