Approaches to informed consent

Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research

Clinical trials for acute conditions such as myocardial infarction and stroke pose challenges related to informed consent due to time limitations, stress, and severe illness. Consent processes should be sensitive to the context in which trials are conducted and to needs of patients and surrogate decision-makers. This manuscript describes a collaborative effort between ethicists, researchers, patients, and surrogates to develop patient-driven, patient-centered approaches to consent for clinical trials in acute myocardial infarction and stroke.Our group identified important ways in which existing consent processes and forms for clinical trials fail to meet patients' and surrogates' needs in the acute context. We collaborated to create model forms and consent processes that are substantially shorter and, hopefully, better-matched to patients' and surrogates' needs and expectations from the perspective of content, structure, and tone. These changes, however, challenge some common conventions regarding consent.

Ethical and legal aspects of global tobacco control

On 28 February 2005, the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control came into force as a result of at least 40 countries becoming State Parties through ratification of this first ever health treaty sponsored by the World Health Organization. This article discusses the bioethical, trade, and legal aspects of global tobacco control. Special emphasis is given to globalisation of tobacco use and the challenges it poses to sovereign nations. It also advocates a bioethical basis in the pursuit of global solutions to expanding tobacco use.

Nested consent design for clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Since random treatment allocation is hardly understood by the majority of patients, a new 'nested consent design' for clinical trials is proposed.

PROPOSED DESIGN

The design consists of a two-step enrollment of study subjects. The first step is the enrollment of participants into a follow-up study, where consent to be subjects involved in the follow-up is obtained. The second step is the enrollment of randomly sampled eligible participants into a new treatment group. After the explanation of (1) treatment mode, (2) additional burdens associated with the proposed treatment and (3) expected effects and possible adverse events, written informed consent is obtained. Those who reject participation and those who are not allocated into the new treatment are treated by standard care. Endpoints are set to be the same for all follow-up study participants whether allocated into the new treatment or not, and follow-up is carried out in the same manner. Analyses are performed between those allocated to the new treatment and those non-allocated on an intent-to-treat basis.

EXAMPLE

Although not a clinical trial, this design was applied in a smoking cessation program at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital for first-visit patients who answered in a questionnaire survey that they were smokers. Out of 1330 necessary participants, 324 were enrolled in the follow-up study during the first three months of enrollment.

CONCLUSIONS

The design was found to be feasible for prevention trials, and possibly for clinical trials to compare a new treatment with a standard treatment. There seems to be no ethical difference between this design and the one-arm study design.