[Massive lower gastrointestinal bleeding treated with superselective embolization]

[Severe lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding due to diverticulosis]

INTRODUCTION

Diverticulosis is the most frequent cause of lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in adults in western countries. The aims of the present study were to analyze: 1) the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with severe lower GI bleeding due to diverticulosis; 2) associated morbidity and mortality; 3) the need for surgery, and 4) bleeding recurrence rates after hospital discharge.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Were retrospectively reviewed 42 patients with severe lower GI bleeding due to diverticulosis. Patients with rectorrhagia requiring transfusion of at least three packed red blood cell units and those with a decrease in hematocrit of 10 points or more were included. As a control group, we used 133 patients with severe lower GI hemorrhage due to causes other than colonic diverticular disease.

RESULTS

All patients were stabilized with conservative measures except one who required emergency surgery. Colonoscopy was performed in 39 patients and the most frequent finding consisted of recent signs of bleeding independently of whether colonoscopy was performed early or was delayed. Endoscopic treatment with Argon laser electrocoagulation was performed in one patient. Bleeding recurrence after hospital discharge occurred in 13 patients (31%); of these, seven (16%) required hospital readmission.

CONCLUSION

Severe lower GI bleeding due to diverticulosis can usually be resolved with conservative treatment although the percentage of bleeding recurrence is high. Early endoscopy is not as important as in the remaining causes of severe lower GI bleeding.

Severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: risk factors for morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Many factors can cause morbidity and mortality in patients with severe acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB). The objectives of this study are to analyze three aspects related to severe acute LGIB: (1) indications and prognostic factors for urgent surgery, (2) risk factors for morbidity and mortality, and (3) relapse rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort was collected between 1985 and 2002 in a tertiary referral center. One hundred seventy-one patients with severe acute LGIB were reviewed (LGIB is defined as frank rectal bleeding either with a hematocrit decrease >/=10 points or when a transfusion of at least three units of concentrated red blood cells is needed). The main outcome measures are: (1) indications for urgent surgery and results, (2) morbidity and mortality, and (3) relapse.

RESULTS

There were 158 (92%) stable patients, and in 61% of these, the bleeding was identified via colonoscopy. Bleeding was identified using urgent colonoscopy in a higher percentage of patients compared to delayed colonoscopy (68% versus 14%; p < 0.001). Urgent surgery was indicated in 24 (14%) patients, and the approach was peri-anal in 5 (21%) patients and abdominal in the rest. Local intestinal resection was performed on the 15 patients in which bleeding was identified, whereas a subtotal colectomy was performed on the remaining 4 patients. The presence of hypotension (p = 0.001; 35 versus 10%) and etiology of LGIB (p < 0.001) are prognostic factors of urgent surgery. Morbidity was 6.4%, and mortality was 4.7%. The only morbidity or mortality risk factors detected were the presence of associated comorbidities (p = 0.008) and the need for urgent surgery (p = 0.002). The most frequent etiology was diverticulosis (25%). After a mean follow-up of 132 +/- 75 months, bleeding relapsed in 30% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It is difficult to predict which patients are going to need urgent surgery in severe acute LGIB; only the presence of hypotension on arrival at the emergency ward would lead us to suspect a negative outcome for the hemorrhage. In severe acute LGIB, morbidity and mortality is high, and this is mainly due to the high level of associated comorbidity and the need for urgent surgery. It is necessary for strict hemodynamic monitoring of the patients at risk if we want to improve outcomes. The bleeding relapse rate is high in LGIB, although generally, it is not severe.

[Management of rectorrhagia having uncertain origin]

Rectorrhagia is a very frequent reason for hospital and Primary Health Care medical visits. Its main problem is that it is made up of a very heterogeneous group of patients and a correct diagnosis is difficult to make. The main diagnostic test is the colonoscopy, and in severe cases, the arteriography. When these examinations do not provide the diagnosis, small intestine disease should be suspected. In most of the cases, rectorrhagia abates spontaneously or is controlled with conservative measures, and the subsequent treatment with depend on the etiology that caused the bleeding. The great problem arises in 0.5%-4% of rectorrhagies that do not abate and unstabilize the patient, emergency surgery due to the bleeding being required.