Short-Term, High-Dose Pamidronate-Induced Acute Tubular Necrosis: The Postulated Mechanisms of Bisphosphonate Nephrotoxicity

Real-world data for the renal safety of abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our study evaluated the renal safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) with bisphosphonate as a treatment option for hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), especially with bone metastasis.

METHODS

Data were collected from HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received abemaciclib with ET between March 2021 and May 2022 in a single medical center in China. We performed an analysis of the change in serum creatine (Cr) and creatine clearance (CrCl), time to first abnormal Cr value, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade of increased creatinine.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age of 56 years and a median weight of 65 kg. Any grade laboratory-assessing increased Cr occurred in 87.1% of patients, while CrCl rarely went down to 30 ml/min. Associations between start dose with grade of increased Cr and menopausal status with alert value, which is defined as creatinine clearance <30 ml/min, were indicated.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate would be safe for renal function in HR+/HER2- ABC patients with bone metastases.

Case report: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome following treatment with pamidronate for calcitriol toxicity

Objective

This study aimed to describe a case of glomerulosclerosis resulting in nephrotic syndrome following the administration of pamidronate disodium to treat clinical calcitriol toxicity in a dog.

Case summary

A 12-week-old intact male Labrador Retriever weighing 11.8 kg presented with lethargy and vomiting for 20 h after ingesting a 100 g tube of topical antipsoriatic cream (3 mcg/g of calcitriol; Vectical Ointment™, Galderma, Lausanne, Switzerland). Severe hypercalcemia was present on the day of the presentation. Hypercalcemia treatments such as saline diuresis, furosemide (Salix®, furosemide, Merck Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ), and dexamethasone sodium phosphate (Dexamethasone SP, Mylan, Canonsburg, PA) were initiated. The dog was also administered a single dose of pamidronate disodium (Pamidronate disodium, Mylan, Canonsburg, PA) on the day of presentation. Initially, the patient's clinical signs improved, and the hypercalcemia resolved. Exactly 130 h post-pamidronate disodium (Dexamethasone SP, Mylan, Canonsburg, PA) administration, the patient developed biochemical abnormalities and severe edema, consistent with nephrotic syndrome, and was euthanized. Necropsy results revealed evidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS).

Unique information

Pamidronate disodium, commonly used for the treatment of hypercalcemia, may have resulted in glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome in a dog with calcitriol toxicity. This complication should be taken into consideration when monitoring patients treated with pamidronate disodium for hypercalcemia.

Bisphosphonates to reduce bone fractures in stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are contraindicated in patients with stage 4+ chronic kidney disease. However, they are widely used to prevent fragility fractures in stage 3 chronic kidney disease, despite a lack of good-quality data on their effects.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of each work package were as follows. Work package 1: to study the relationship between bisphosphonate use and chronic kidney disease progression. Work package 2: to study the association between using bisphosphonates and fracture risk. Work package 3: to determine the risks of hypocalcaemia, hypophosphataemia, acute kidney injury and upper gastrointestinal events associated with using bisphosphonates. Work package 4: to investigate the association between using bisphosphonates and changes in bone mineral density over time.

DESIGN

This was a new-user cohort study design with propensity score matching.

SETTING AND DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from UK NHS primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD database) and linked hospital inpatient records (Hospital Episode Statistics) for work packages 1-3 and from the Danish Odense University Hospital Databases for work package 4.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients registered in the data sources who had at least one measurement of estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 were eligible. A second estimated glomerular filtration rate value of < 45 ml/minute/1.73 m2 within 1 year after the first was requested for work packages 1 and 3. Patients with no Hospital Episode Statistics linkage were excluded from work packages 1-3. Patients with < 1 year of run-in data before index estimated glomerular filtration rate and previous users of anti-osteoporosis medications were excluded from work packages 1-4.

INTERVENTIONS/EXPOSURE

Bisphosphonate use, identified from primary care prescriptions (for work packages 1-3) or pharmacy dispensations (for work package 4), was the main exposure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Work package 1: chronic kidney disease progression, defined as stage worsening or starting renal replacement. Work package 2: hip fracture. Work package 3: acute kidney injury, hypocalcaemia and hypophosphataemia identified from Hospital Episode Statistics, and gastrointestinal events identified from Clinical Practice Research Datalink or Hospital Episode Statistics. Work package 4: annualised femoral neck bone mineral density percentage change.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonate use was associated with an excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression (subdistribution hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02 to 1.24) in work package 1, but did not increase the probability of other safety outcomes in work package 3. The results from work package 2 suggested that bisphosphonate use increased fracture risk (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39) for hip fractures, but sensitivity analyses suggested that this was related to unresolved confounding. Conversely, work package 4 suggested that bisphosphonates improved bone mineral density, with an average 2.65% (95% confidence interval 1.32% to 3.99%) greater gain in femoral neck bone mineral density per year in bisphosphonate users than in matched non-users.

LIMITATIONS

Confounding by indication was a concern for the clinical effectiveness (i.e. work package 2) data. Bias analyses suggested that these findings were due to inappropriate adjustment for pre-treatment risk. work packages 3 and 4 were based on small numbers of events and participants, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Bisphosphonates were associated with a 12% excess risk of chronic kidney disease progression in participants with stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease. No other safety concerns were identified. Bisphosphonate therapy increased bone mineral density, but the research team failed to demonstrate antifracture effectiveness.

FUTURE WORK

Randomised controlled trial data are needed to demonstrate antifracture efficacy in patients with stage 3B+ chronic kidney disease. More safety analyses are needed to characterise the renal toxicity of bisphosphonates in stage 3A chronic kidney disease, possibly using observational data.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as EUPAS10029.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 17. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The project was also supported by the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford.

Comparison of the Effects of Denosumab and Alendronate on Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Osteoporotic Patients

A correlation between impaired bone metabolism, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) has been suggested. This study aimed to compare the effects of denosumab and alendronate, two anti-resorptive agents, on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in osteoporotic patients. Propensity score-matched cohort study comparing denosumab to alendronate users between January 2005 and December 2017 was conducted from a large medical organization in Taiwan. Risks of CVD development and renal function decline were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression. A total 2523 patients were recruited in each group. No significant difference in cardiovascular events was found between the two groups over a 5-year study period. Stratified analysis results showed that denosumab was likely to exert protective effects against composite CVD in patients with medication possession rate ≥60% (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR), 0.74; p = 0.0493) and myocardial infraction (AHR, 0.42; p = 0.0415). Denosumab was associated with increased risk of renal function decline in male patients (AHR, 1.78; p = 0.0132), patients with renal insufficiency (AHR, 1.5; p = 0.0132), and patients with acute kidney injury during the study period (AHR, 1.53; p = 0.0154). Conclusively, denosumab may exert cardiovascular benefits in patients with good adherence but may have renal disadvantages in certain conditions and thus must be used with caution.

Role of Oxidative Stress in Drug-Induced Kidney Injury

The kidney plays a primary role in maintaining homeostasis and detoxification of numerous hydrophilic xenobiotics as well as endogenous compounds. Because the kidney is exposed to a larger proportion and higher concentration of drugs and toxins than other organs through the secretion of ionic drugs by tubular organic ion transporters across the luminal membranes of renal tubular epithelial cells, and through the reabsorption of filtered toxins into the lumen of the tubule, these cells are at greater risk for injury. In fact, drug-induced kidney injury is a serious problem in clinical practice and accounts for roughly 20% of cases of acute kidney injury (AKI) among hospitalized patients. Therefore, its early detection is becoming more important. Usually, drug-induced AKI consists of two patterns of renal injury: acute tubular necrosis (ATN) and acute interstitial nephritis (AIN). Whereas AIN develops from medications that incite an allergic reaction, ATN develops from direct toxicity on tubular epithelial cells. Among several cellular mechanisms underlying ATN, oxidative stress plays an important role in progression to ATN by activation of inflammatory response via proinflammatory cytokine release and inflammatory cell accumulation in tissues. This review provides an overview of drugs associated with AKI, the role of oxidative stress in drug-induced AKI, and a biomarker for drug-induced AKI focusing on oxidative stress.

Renal safety of 1-hour pamidronate infusion for breast cancer and multiple myeloma patients: comparison between clinical trials and population-based database

Purpose. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends infusion of pamidronate over 2 hours to avoid renal deterioration, although there are data to suggest that 1-hour infusions may be safe.

Methods, Prevalence of renal deterioration with 1-hour pamidronate infusions from a population database was compared to renal deterioration with 2-hour pamidronate infusions, in randomised, controlled, trials. A cost-minimisation analysis, comparing the 1-and 2-hour pamidronate infusions, and the 15-minute infusion of zoledronic acid, was performed with a sensitivity analysis that varied the opportunity cost of time in the treatment room.

Results. Renal deterioration occurred in 7.7% of 169 patients with multiple myeloma and metastatic breast cancer. There is no evidence that this differs from the 10% reported in randomised, controlled, trials (one-tailed binomial test, P=0.3874). A subgroup analysis showed that renal deterioration occurred in 15 and 1.1% of patients with multiple myeloma and metastatic breast cancer, respectively. The median increase in serum creatinine was 13 and 7% in the multiple myeloma and breast cancer groups, respectively. The respective costs/dose (drug/ labour/supplies) of pamidronate and zoledronic acid are $325 and $610. Cost neutrality occurs if the opportunity cost of chair time is $6.33/ minute for pamidronate 1-hour versus zoledronic acid, and $2.71/minute for pamidronate 2-hour versus zoledronic acid. If a median $4/minute is used, the respective costs of pamidronate 1-hour, 2-hour, and zoledronic acid infusions are $685, $925, and $790/cycle.

Conclusions. Prevalence of renal deterioration with 1-hour pamidronate infusions from a population database was not significantly different to 2-hour pamidronate infusions in clinical trials. Our findings suggest further support for the safety of 1-hour pamidronate infusions. Pamidronate via 1-hour infusion is less expensive than zoledronic acid.

Documentation of renal glomerular and tubular impairment and glomerular hyperfiltration in multitransfused patients with beta thalassemia

Urinary albumin to creatinine (ACR) and beta2 microglobulin to creatinine ratios (BCR) are the surrogate and robust markers of renal glomerulopathy and tubulopathy, respectively. These markers predict short-term renal deterioration and mortality in various conditions. We aimed to assess the frequency and predictors of glomerular and tubular defects, renal impairment, and hyperfiltration in 96 adult patients with beta thalassemia intermedia and major. ACR > 300 mg/g creatinine and BCR > 300 μg/g creatinine were used to define the renal glomerular and tubular damages, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate (eGFRcreat) was estimated according to 2009 the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Decreased eGFRcreat was defined as less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Renal glomerular and/or tubular defects were observed in about 68.8 % of all patients. Forty percent of patients had glomerular hyperfiltration. None of the patients had a decreased eGFRcreat. T2* value ≤20 msec on cardiac magnetic resonance (cMR) was the only independent predictor of glomerular damage (p = 0.013). Use of alendronate was associated with less renal tubular damage (p = 0.007). Female gender and previous history of splenectomy were the independent predictors of glomerular hyperfiltration in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.040, respectively). Renal tubular and glomerular damage is frequent in adult patients with thalassemia intermedia and major. T2* value on cMR was the only independent predictor of glomerular damage. However, since we did not explore all the parameters of iron, it is not possible to draw a definite conclusion about the association of cMR and glomerular damage. There is no association with cardiac iron overload/accumulation and tubular damage or hyperfiltration.

International Myeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease

PURPOSE

The aim of the International Myeloma Working Group was to develop practice recommendations for the management of multiple myeloma (MM) -related bone disease.

METHODOLOGY

An interdisciplinary panel of clinical experts on MM and myeloma bone disease developed recommendations based on published data through August 2012. Expert consensus was used to propose additional recommendations in situations where there were insufficient published data. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were assigned and approved by panel members.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Bisphosphonates (BPs) should be considered in all patients with MM receiving first-line antimyeloma therapy, regardless of presence of osteolytic bone lesions on conventional radiography. However, it is unknown if BPs offer any advantage in patients with no bone disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging or positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Intravenous (IV) zoledronic acid (ZOL) or pamidronate (PAM) is recommended for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with MM. ZOL is preferred over oral clodronate in newly diagnosed patients with MM because of its potential antimyeloma effects and survival benefits. BPs should be administered every 3 to 4 weeks IV during initial therapy. ZOL or PAM should be continued in patients with active disease and should be resumed after disease relapse, if discontinued in patients achieving complete or very good partial response. BPs are well tolerated, but preventive strategies must be instituted to avoid renal toxicity or osteonecrosis of the jaw. Kyphoplasty should be considered for symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. Low-dose radiation therapy can be used for palliation of uncontrolled pain, impending pathologic fracture, or spinal cord compression. Orthopedic consultation should be sought for long-bone fractures, spinal cord compression, and vertebral column instability.

Renal Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Ibandronate in Multiple Myeloma Patients With or Without Impaired Renal Function

In this open-label study, the authors assessed the pharmacokinetics and safety of ibandronate in patients with multiple myeloma and varying renal function. Renal deterioration was graded at baseline depending on creatinine clearance in 4 stages (0: >80; 1: 50-79; 2: 30-49, and 3: <30 mL/min). Patients (n = 40) received intravenous ibandronate 6 mg (30-minute infusion). Ibandronate excretion and serum levels were measured over 24 hours. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and markers of tubular damage were monitored before ibandronate infusion and at 24 and 72 hours following ibandronate infusion. Ibandronate clearance, AUC(0-24), AUC(0-infinity), serum t((1/2)), and C(max) were calculated. There was a significant positive correlation between ibandronate clearance and creatinine clearance (r = 0.858; P < .00001). The AUC for grade 3 renal insufficiency increased by approximately 60% versus grade 0 (P < .01) but was not significantly different between other grades of renal function. The t((1/2)) did not increase significantly, and peak serum levels of ibandronate were similar for the 4 grades of renal function. Serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and markers of tubular damage did not change significantly within 72 hours of ibandronate infusion. Despite renal function already being compromised in this patient group, there was no evidence of acute nephrotoxicity with ibandronate.

Nephrotic syndrome after oral bisphosphonate (alendronate) administration in a patient with osteoporosis

Alendronate is a widely used bisphosphonate in the treatment of osteoporosis. Although it has been proven to be a very useful drug, it has some side effects as well. In this paper, we describe a case of nephrotic syndrome due to alendronate administration. A 36-year-old man was admitted to the nephrology outpatient clinic with widespread edema 4 months after initiation of alendronate. He had a 13-kg weight gain within a 2-week period. He had no clinical or laboratory problems apart from osteoporosis, which was the indication for initiation of the drug. Physical examination at admission was unremarkable, but for nephrotic edema. Laboratory studies revealed nephrotic range proteinuria (13.5 g/day), normal renal function, hypoalbuminemia (1.7 g/dl), and also hypercholesterolemia (400 mg/dl). A kidney biopsy was performed. Light microscopic evaluation revealed a slight increase in mesangial cells and matrix; however, no abnormalities in the tubules or interstitium were noted. Alendronate was withdrawn and diuretic therapy was initiated. Patient's weight gradually decreased from 84 to 67 kg within a 1-week period. No other drugs for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome were administered. During the clinical course, serum creatinine remained stable, and proteinuria gradually decreased and disappeared 40 days after stopping alendronate. It was noted that alendronate administration can give rise to nephrotic syndrome, while discontinuation of this drug may improve the pathology without any specific treatment.

The risk of cumulative renal effects of intravenous bisphosphonates

Some level of renal dysfunction is common in patients with cancer. This could be a result of an age-related kidney function decrease, the underlying disease (eg, multiple myeloma), or the effects of nephrotoxic medications. Some intravenous (I.V.) bisphosphonates have been associated with occasional renal toxicity in the clinical setting. Therefore, the choice of an I.V. bisphosphonate should take into account the risk of renal deterioration. Preclinical studies also suggest that there might be considerable differences between the renal safety profiles of commonly used I.V. bisphosphonates. Variations in the risk of histopathologic damage and the ability to cause cumulative toxicity have been observed in comparative preclinical studies of I.V. bisphosphonates. The reasons for these apparent differences are not fully understood. Research shows that renal safety profiles might be influenced by pharmacokinetic properties, such as renal tissue half-life, protein binding, and intracellular potency. Preclinical analyses are warranted in order to confirm and evaluate these differences between bisphosphonates.

Prognostic factors and jaw and renal complications among multiple myeloma patients treated with zoledronic acid

Few studies have evaluated prognostic factors among patients with multiple myeloma (MM) since new therapies have become available. Monthly zoledronic acid (ZOL) has been incorporated into many treatment regimens to reduce skeletal-related events (SREs), but outcomes among patients receiving this bisphosphonate have not been well-defined. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine baseline and on-treatment prognostic factors in these patients. Data were collected from the date of diagnosis on 300 consecutive MM patients treated with ZOL. Median duration of ZOL was 18 months (range 1-121 months). The skeletal morbidity rate was 0.116 events per patient year. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 69%. Risk factors for shortened OS included SREs, increased serum creatinine, and International Staging System (ISS) Stage II or III. Thirty-four (11%) patients showed worsening renal function. In 28 of these patients, ZOL was discontinued and restarted in half of these patients following a brief delay. Only 5 of the 34 patients showed worsening of their renal function. Fourteen patients (4.7%) developed osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). All patients with ONJ are in remission or with stable disease except one patient who died of a myocardial infarction while in remission. Only two patients showed some worsening of ONJ despite of ongoing monthly ZOL. Overall, these results suggest that skeletal complications are an important prognostic factor for MM. Although ONJ and renal deterioration may infrequently occur with ZOL, most patients do not experience worsening of these conditions with ongoing treatment with this bisphosphonate.

The Effect of Alendronate, Risedronate, and Raloxifene on Renal Functions, Based on the Cockcroft and Gault Method, in Postmenopausal Women

BACKGROUND

Oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are effective treatment options in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is little previously reported about the renal safety profiles of these three agents in osteoporosis. We aimed to assess the risk of renal toxicity associated with oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis, prospectively.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-seven patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia according to lumbar or femoral-neck bone mineral density t score were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to alendronate 70 mg once weekly (n = 47), risedronate 35 mg once weekly (n = 44), or raloxifene 60 mg per day (n = 36) for one year. Preliminary screening included medical history, physical examination, lumbar and femoral bone mineral densitometry measurement, and blood biochemical tests, including renal function tests. The biochemical markers were then assessed at the end of 12 months.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between basal and final renal function parameters of each group. Also these parameters did not differ between the three groups after 12 months of treatment period.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are all safe drugs for renal functions in the treatment of osteoporosis.

High incidence of hypocalcemia and serum creatinine increase in patients with bone metastases treated with zoledronic acid

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid belongs to the new generation of bisphosphonates with demonstrated clinical benefit for the treatment of bone metastases from different kinds of neoplasms. Hypocalcemia and serum creatinine elevation are expected adverse events during this therapy. The monitoring of serum calcium and creatinine is therefore recommended. The primary aim of this study was to establish the actual incidence of hypocalcemia and serum creatinine elevation during treatment with zoledronic acid. Skeletal-related events and side effects were also assessed.

METHODS

Serum creatinine and calcium levels were evaluated in 240 consecutive patients (83 males, 157 females; mean age, 62 years) with metastatic bone lesions from different solid tumors treated with zoledronic acid.

RESULTS

Overall, 93 of 240 patients (38.8%) developed hypocalcemia, which was grade (G)1 in 45 patients (48.4%), G2 in 37 patients (39.8%), G3 in 10 patients (10.8%), and G4 in one patient (1.1%). The median time to occurrence of hypocalcemia (any grade) was 2.3 months after the beginning of the treatment (range, 0-34.9 months). Increased serum creatinine was observed in 33 of 240 patients (13.7%), of whom 19 had G1 (57.6%), 11 had G2 (33.3%), and three had G3 (9.1%). The median time to serum creatinine increase (for any grade) was 4.7 months (range, 0-29.2 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows a high incidence of hypocalcemia and increased serum creatinine level during treatment with zoledronic acid. These results strongly support the need for accurate monitoring of plasma calcium and creatinine levels.

Bisphosphonate-associated osteomyelitis of the jaw: guidelines for practicing clinicians

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature and discuss the risk factors, mechanisms, pathophysiologic aspects, and recommended management of bisphosphonate-associated osteomyelitis of the jaw (BAOMJ).

METHODS

More than 350 published articles, case reports mentioning BAOMJ, and independent histology slides from BAOMJ lesions were reviewed critically. The most pertinent publications are cited and discussed.

RESULTS

The incidence of BAOMJ increases after extraction of teeth, dentoalveolar surgical procedures, or recent oral trauma leading to exposed maxillary or mandibular bone. Contributory factors include poor oral hygiene, oral infections, periodontal disease; recent or ongoing corticosteroid administration or chemotherapy; compromised immune status; diabetes or vascular insufficiency; old age; chronic diseases; and malignancies. On average, 1 of every 100,000 patients treated with bisphosphonates orally for osteoporosis or Paget disease of bone may develop BAOMJ-like lesions. Patients with cancer often receive bisphosphonate doses 10 times or higher, and also more frequently, than those used in patients with osteoporosis or Paget disease of bone. Therefore, greater frequency of administration of bisphosphonates, higher dosages, and prolonged use (that is, for more than 2 years) are likely to be factors triggering BAOMJ.

CONCLUSION

The association of bisphosphonate therapy with BAOMJ is rare in noncancer patients and is likely to be a class effect that may occur with use of any bisphosphonate. Whether patients with cancer require such a high frequency of intravenously administered bisphosphonates needs to be investigated. Following established guidelines can decrease the risks of BAOMJ in vulnerable patients. Rather than necrotic bone, current evidence supports an infectious and perhaps immunologic underlying cause for BAOMJ. The estimated incidence of BAOMJ among noncancer patients receiving bisphosphonates is about 0.001%, whereas among patients with cancer receiving intravenous bisphosphonate therapy the incidence is between 0.5% and 4%, depending on the dose, frequency, and duration of therapy (on average, approximately 2%). Nevertheless, the benefits of bisphosphonates far outweigh the risks.

Reversal of hypercalcemic acute kidney injury by treatment with intravenous bisphosphonates

We present the details of three children with hypercalcemia-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). After traditional therapy with fluids, loop diuretics, steroids and calcitonin had failed to correct the hypercalcemia, they were given treatment with low doses of intravenous (i.v.) pamidronate, which resulted in normalization of serum calcium and kidney function. In one child Doppler renal ultrasound revealed dampened arterial blood flow, which resolved with normalization of serum calcium. On the basis of cumulative data and our experience, we suggest that i.v. application of bisphosphonates be moved from the second to the first line of treatment of hypercalcemic AKI.

Metastatic bone pain: treatment options with an emphasis on bisphosphonates

INTRODUCTION

One of the key targets for metastatic cancer cells is the skeleton. Once metastatic cells are established within the bone matrix, skeletal integrity becomes increasingly compromised. Bone lesions lead to various complications, including bone pain, fractures and spinal cord compression.

MECHANISMS OF BONE PAIN

Bone pain is debilitating and affects quality of life of the patient. In addition, it increases the use of health care resources. Many patients with metastatic bone disease experience substantial bone pain despite state-of-the-art systemic analgesic treatment. Incident pain is the predominant pain syndrome.

TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR BONE PAIN

Typically, this syndrome requires moderate baseline analgesia with increased on-demand doses. Other techniques for treating bone pain, including radiation therapy, neuraxial application of analgesics, nerve blocks and local stabilisation procedures, should be considered. In addition, therapy with bisphosphonates targeting bone-specific pain is an important strategy. This review discusses the various management options for bone pain arising from metastatic bone disease.

Renal safety of intravenous bisphosphonates in the treatment of osteoporosis

Oral bisphosphonates are the mainstay of treatment for osteoporosis but cannot be used in some patients due to gastrointestinal contraindications, gastrointestinal intolerance, malabsorption or the inability to comply with dosing requirements. In such patients, intravenous bisphosphonates are a useful alternative. This review summarises the renal safety issues associated with the use of intravenous bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Intravenous bisphosphonates are generally well tolerated, which may be a reflection of their selective activity in bone and metabolic stability. Adverse effects on renal function are primarily related to infusion rate and dose. Due to lack of data, no conclusions can be made regarding bisphosphonate safety in patients with intrinsic renal disease or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 30 ml/min.

Complications of myeloma therapy

The advent of new therapies for multiple myeloma brings new hope for patients but also new side effects. Emerging information about the risks of supportive care therapies, including long-term, high-intensity bisphosphonate use and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, is examined. As the number of drugs in the myeloma armamentarium grows, so does the list of possible side effects and interactions. With current progress, not only are there more complications to consider but patients are also living longer and the risk for delayed complications is becoming more relevant. The author provides perspective about the risks for the most active and commonly used single-agent and combination myeloma therapies.

Bisphosphonates

Osteoporosis is the result of bone loss due to an imbalance in bone turnover such that bone resorption exceeds bone formation. Bisphosphonates are potent inhibitors of osteoclast activity that reduce bone turnover and re-establish the balance between bone resorption and formation. In clinical studies, several bisphosphonates prevent bone loss, preserve bone structure, improve bone strength and, in patients with osteoporosis, substantially reduce fracture risk. They are effective in multiple clinical settings including postmenopausal osteoporosis, low bone mass in men and drug-induced bone loss. Intermittent oral dosing and intravenous administration are more convenient than the original daily dosing regimen. These drugs are generally well tolerated and have an excellent safety profile in that serious side effects are uncommon. Potent bisphosphonates are generally the preferred treatment option for most patients with or at risk for osteoporosis.

Zoledronic acid in the management of metastatic bone disease

Bisphosphonate therapy has become a standard of therapy for patients with malignant bone disease. Moreover, in vivo preclinical and preliminary clinical data suggest that bisphosphonates may prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss and the onset of malignant bone disease in patients with early-stage cancer. This comprehensive review critically reports the several preclinical evidences of action of bisphosphonates on osteoclasts, lymphocytes and tumour cells. In addition, all the clinical trials evaluating the effects of principal bisphosphonates on skeletal disease progression in patients with breast cancer, prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and other cancers have been reported. Of the available bisphosphonates, intravenous zoledronic acid has demonstrated the broadest clinical activity and is actually approved for the treatment of bone metastases from any solid tumour in many countries. Renal safety is an important consideration for oncologists who are treating patients with bisphosphonates. This issue and the other topics relating to the safety of bisphosphonates are discussed in this review.

Ibandronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia or nephrocalcinosis in patients with multiple myeloma and acute renal failure: Case reports

Multiple myeloma disrupts calcium homeostasis by a variety of mechanisms, including bone destruction and resorption. This causes hypercalcemia. When left untreated, hypercalcemia leads to nephrocalcinosis, impairment of kidney function, and eventually renal failure. Some degree of renal dysfunction is common in myeloma patients. Here, we report case studies showing the efficacy and renal safety of the single-nitrogen bisphosphonate, ibandronate, for the treatment of hypercalcemia and/or nephrocalcinosis in multiple myeloma patients hospitalized with acute renal failure. Patients (n = 7) received either one or two intravenous infusions of ibandronate (2-6 mg). Ibandronate was well tolerated in all patients and returned elevated blood calcium levels to normal. Renal function improved for all patients and normalized in 3/7 patients. We conclude that ibandronate is involved in rapidly improving or restoring acute renal function and calcium levels to within the normal range in this patient population. To clarify the exact value of ibandronate, further investigation is warranted in randomized prospective trials.

Management of the adverse effects associated with intravenous bisphosphonates

Intravenous bisphosphonates are widely used to treat hypercalcemia and to reduce skeletal-related morbidity among cancer patients. However, serious complications, generally occurring in less than 2% of patients participated in phase III clinical trials, including acute systemic inflammatory reaction, ocular inflammation, renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, electrolyte imbalance, and osteonecrosis of the maxilla and mandible have all been increasingly reported. Yet, strategies to deal with these complications are becoming clear. Acute systemic inflammatory reaction is often self-limited and becomes less intense during subsequent treatments. For patients who develop ocular symptoms, prompt ophthalmologic evaluation is crucial to determine the safety of a subsequent bisphosphonate therapy. Patients who receive long-term pamidronate should be evaluated at intervals for early sign of nephritic syndrome as timely cessation of the agent may result in a full recovery. To reduce the risk of severe electrolyte abnormalities, particularly hypocalcemia, correcting any pre-treatment electrolyte abnormality and supplementing vitamin D and calcium may be helpful. Finally, to reduce the risk of osteonecrosis of the maxilla and mandible, obtaining a full dental evaluation before treatment and avoidance of invasive dental procedures is suggested. The three commonly used intravenous bisphosphonates (pamidronate, zoledronic acid, and ibandronate), are generally safe; ibandronate has to date been the least reported to be associated with renal side effects. As clinical indications of intravenous bisphosphonates continue to expand, prescribing clinicians should be familiar with these possible adverse effects and discuss them with patients before commencing or continuing on therapy.

Renal safety and efficacy of i.v. bisphosphonates in patients with skeletal metastases treated for up to 10 Years

INTRODUCTION

Bisphosphonates (BPs) delay the onset or reduce the incidence of skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases. However, there are few data on the renal safety and activity of i.v. BPs beyond 2 years of administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed serum creatinine (SCr) levels and skeletal-related events (SREs) in cancer patients receiving i.v. BPs for >or= 24 months. All patients received 90 mg pamidronate every 3-4 weeks. Pre- and post-treatment SCr levels and the peak levels attained were recorded. A notable SCr increase was defined as: an increase >0.5 mg/dl for patients with baseline SCr <1.4 mg/dl; an increase >1 mg/dl for patients with baseline SCr >1.4 mg/dl; or doubling over baseline. The following parameters were also analyzed: the proportion of patients with at least one SRE, the distribution of each type of SRE, the time to first SRE, and the skeletal morbidity rate (SMR).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients with bone metastases resulting from breast cancer (BC) (n = 48), multiple myeloma (n = 7), renal cell carcinoma (n = 1), and prostate cancer (n = 1) were evaluated. The median age at the start of treatment was 57 years (range, 27-81); 25% of the patients were >70 years old. Forty-three patients received pamidronate then switched to zoledronic acid. The median overall duration of BP administration was 34 months (range, 24+ to 131+), with a median duration of zoledronic acid therapy of 25 months (range, 2-40). Twenty-seven of 48 BC patients received different chemotherapy regimens (median number of lines, 2; range, 1-6). The median SCr levels were: baseline, 0.82 mg/dl (range, 0.4-1.4); time of analysis, 0.89 mg/dl (0.4-2); highest level, 1.0 mg/dl (0.5-2). A notable SCr increase was observed in seven patients (12.2%; all grade 1). Twenty-six patients (45.6%) experienced SREs after starting BP treatment. The median time to first SRE was 911 days (95% confidence interval, 731; 1,023). The SMR was 0.20 events per year. Ten patients ceased treatment because of: an SCr level of 2 mg/dl (n = 1) physician decision (n = 6) and jaw osteonecrosis (n = 3). Ten patients died of progressive disease.

CONCLUSION

i.v. BPs are safe and active during prolonged treatment administration, and renal function is maintained in patients receiving multiple cytotoxic therapies. Jaw osteonecrosis occurred in 5% of the study population, and its causal relationship with BP treatment requires further observation and study.

Long-Term Safety of Intravenous Ibandronic Acid for Up to 4 Years in??Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite their widespread use in metastatic bone disease, some bisphosphonate drugs are associated with adverse events (AEs), particularly renal toxicity, adding to treatment burdens and increasing healthcare costs. Ibandronic acid is a single-nitrogen bisphosphonate with high efficacy against bone events and metastatic bone pain, and a renal safety profile compar- able to that of placebo. In this study, the safety of ibandronic acid was examined over a period of 4 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During an initial 96-week period, breast cancer patients with bone metastases were randomised in double-blind fashion to placebo or ibandronic acid 6mg administered by intravenous infusion over 1-2 hours every 3-4 weeks as part of a previously reported phase III trial (MF 4265 study). All patients completing the phase III trial were offered open-label active treatment for a further 96 weeks (extension phase). A total of 62 patients received ibandronic acid 6mg in this extension phase and were classified according to their initial treatment (placebo/ibandronic acid 6mg [placebo/6mg] and ibandronic acid 6mg/ibandronic acid 6mg [6mg/6mg] groups). Safety was assessed by AE reports and clinical laboratory evaluations.

RESULTS

During the 4-year study, most patients experienced at least one AE, with malignancy progression being most commonly reported. However, fewer treatment-related AEs were reported in the extension phase (placebo/6mg: 6.3% [1/16]; 6mg/6mg: 13.0% [6/46]) than in the initial phase of the study (placebo: 56.3% [9/16]; 6mg: 67.4% [31/46]). Serious AEs were mainly due to malignancy progression. There were no clinically relevant renal AEs, and in both groups, serum creatinine levels were similar for up to 4 years.

CONCLUSION

This 96-week open-label safety extension of a phase III, placebo-controlled trial demonstrates that long-term use of intravenous ibandronic acid is well tolerated.

Bisphosphonate Complications Including Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

Bisphosphonate therapy has been incorporated in the standard management of patients with multiple myeloma–related bony disease. Although their efficacy in reducing skeletal related events is important in the supportive management of the myeloma patient, post-marketing experience with this class of agents, particularly the more potent intravenous agents pamidronate and zoledronic acid, have raised cautionary notes regarding the potential side effects of these agents. The focus of this session is to review the risk factors, incidence, prevention strategies and management of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. In addition, pathophysiology, incidence and monitoring for renal dysfunction during chronic therapy with these agents are reviewed.

Preclinical Perspectives on Bisphosphonate Renal Safety

Renal insufficiency is not rare in cancer patients who may receive nephrotoxic medications as antineo-plastic agents or for comorbid conditions. Thus, the choice of a particular bisphosphonate for patients with metastatic bone disease should be based not only on efficacy but also on the risk for renal deterioration. Some i.v. bisphosphonates have been associated with occasional renal toxicity in the clinical setting. Preclinical studies have also shown that there may be considerable differences among bisphosphonate renal safety profiles. Comparative studies show variations in the risk for histopathologic damage and the ability to cause cumulative toxicity during intermittent dosing. Reasons for the differences among bisphosphonates are not fully understood; however, research shows that they may be influenced by pharmacokinetic properties such as renal tissue half-life or protein binding and intracellular potency. Further preclinical analyses are needed to confirm and evaluate differences among bisphosphonates.

Ibandronate in metastatic bone disease: a review of preclinical data

Bisphosphonates are widely used to prevent and treat skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease. There is increasing evidence that, besides inhibiting osteoclast activity and reducing bone resorption, bisphosphonates also have an anti-tumor effect. This paper reviews the preclinical data for ibandronate. Ibandronate increased the proportion of apoptotic tumor cells in vitro and in vivo, possibly following activation of caspase-like proteases. In vitro, ibandronate also prevented adhesion and spreading of tumor cells to bone, and tumor cell invasion. These inhibitory effects were additive when ibandronate was given with paclitaxel or docetaxel. In animal models of tumor-induced osteolysis, ibandronate significantly reduced the development of osteolytic lesions. Efficacy for the prevention and reduction of bone metastases was related to the timing of treatment; ibandronate treatment initiated prior to or shortly after tumor cell inoculation inhibited the growth of bone metastases and preserved skeletal integrity most effectively. As with other bisphosphonates, the influence of ibandronate on soft tissue metastases has been inconsistent. Overall, preclinical evidence supports the rationale for adjuvant treatment with ibandronate for patients at risk of metastatic bone disease. The renal safety profile of ibandronate supports its suitability for long-term adjuvant use, even with intermittent high dosing. Adjuvant clinical trials have been initiated. The ability of bisphosphonates to preserve skeletal integrity is also of benefit in other clinical settings. Recent studies in rat models demonstrate improved osseointegration of joint implants following ibandronate therapy, with potential application in patients with conditions such as degenerative arthritis or osteoporosis.

Zoledronic Acid and Renal Toxicity: Data from French Adverse Effect Reporting Database

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid–associated renal impairment leading to renal failure has been recently reported in a cohort of US patients. However, the presence of such toxicity in other populations has not yet been determined.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze French cases of zoledronic acid–associated nephrotoxicity.

METHODS

We evaluated available cases with acute deterioration of renal function associated with zoledronic acid therapy drawn from the French Adverse Event Reporting System database until July 1, 2004.

RESULTS

We identified 4 men and 3 women between the ages of 52 and 70 years, with multiple myeloma or different types of metastatic cancer, who had experienced renal impairment during zoledronic acid therapy. Four patients developed de novo acute renal failure, while the other 3 patients experienced acute deterioration of preexisting chronic renal failure. Renal failure occurred after various durations of zoledronic acid therapy (1–120 days). Three patients completely recovered and one partially recovered their previous renal function after discontinuation of zoledronic acid, but renal impairment was associated with a fatal outcome in 2 cases; the outcome of the other case was unknown. Our data confirm the previously reported risk factors for zoledronic acid–associated nephrotoxicity such as advanced cancer, multiple myeloma, preexisting renal failure, diabetes, hypertension, and concomitant use of nephrotoxic drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

These cases emphasize the need for regular monitoring of renal function during zoledronic acid treatment, with particular attention to patients with preexisting impaired renal function.

Review of ibandronate in the treatment of metastatic bone disease: experience from phase III trials

BACKGROUND

Metastatic bone disease is a serious clinical problem in patients with advanced cancer. Bisphosphonates inhibit the activity of osteoclasts and are the treatment of choice for bone metastases.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the efficacy and safety data from Phase III trials of ibandronate in metastatic bone disease.

METHODS

Phase III data (available as of June 2004) for ibandronate were reviewed. Literature searches using the MEDLINE database and abstracts from scientific meetings were used to obtain data from Phase III trials of ibandronate.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, patients with bone metastases from breast cancer receiving IV ibandronate (6 mg infused over 1-2 hours every 3-4 weeks) or oral ibandronate (50 mg/d for up to 96 weeks) had a statistically significant reduction in skeletal complications, as measured by the Skeletal Morbidity Period Rate (P = 0.004 vs placebo). Multivariate Poisson regression analysis of the data showed that the risk of a new bone event was reduced by 40% with IV ibandronate 6 mg and by 38% with oral ibandronate 50 mg, compared with placebo (P < or = 0.003). Both formulations also reduced bone pain below baseline levels over 2 years (P < or = 0.001 vs placebo). IV and oral ibandronate were well tolerated, with adverse-event profiles comparable to placebo and no significant renal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

IV and oral ibandronate provide meaningful clinical benefits in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer. Both formulations reduce the risk of skeletal events and provide sustained relief from metastatic bone pain. With its favorable efficacy and safety profile, and the added convenience of the oral formulation, ibandronate provides improved treatment options for managing metastatic bone disease.

Efficacy and safety of ibandronate in the treatment of neoplastic bone disease

Bone is an organ commonly involved in spreading neoplastic disease, especially in multiple myeloma and carcinoma of the breast, prostate and lung. Skeletal stabilisation and pain relief are the main treatment goals in metastatic bone disease. Bisphosphonate treatment inhibits osseous breakdown and is well-established as the current standard therapy for reducing complications of neoplastic bone disease (e.g., pain, fractures and hypercalcaemia). Ibandronate is a third-generation bisphosphonate that has recently been approved for the treatment of bone metastases caused by breast cancer. The oral and intravenous formulations of ibandronate appear to have comparable efficacy. Ibandronate has also been shown to provide significant and sustained relief from metastatic bone pain over 2 years of treatment, improving patient functioning and quality of life. With a favourable long-term safety profile and the added convenience and flexibility offered by its efficacious oral formulation, ibandronate represents a new therapeutic option for metastatic bone disease management.

Management of bone loss after organ transplantation

Organ transplant recipients experience rapid bone loss and high fracture rates, particularly during the early post-transplant period. Early rapid bone loss occurs in the setting of uncoupled bone turnover with increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation. Because there are no clinical factors that reliably predict post-transplant bone loss and fractures in the individual patient, all transplant recipients should be considered candidates for early preventive therapy for osteoporosis. Long-term transplant recipients with densitometric osteoporosis and/or fractures should also receive treatment. Although active metabolites of vitamin D and bisphosphonates have both shown efficacy, data from clinical trials suggest that bisphosphonates are the safest and most consistently effective agents for the prevention and treatment of post-transplantation osteoporosis in adults. Kidney transplant recipients represent a special population, and more research is needed to delineate the risks and benefits of treating bone disease in these patients.

Profiling the safety and tolerability of bisphosphonates

Because patients with metastatic bone disease suffer a significant burden from their illness and from anticancer treatments, it is therefore important to minimize the side effects of bisphosphonates. The intravenous bisphosphonates, zoledronic acid and pamidronate, have tolerability issues that include a flu-like syndrome, injection-site reactions, and occasional renal toxicity. Because of the potentially severe nature of the renal toxicity, renal monitoring is required before each dose, with drug withdrawal if the patients' renal function deteriorates. Oral clodronate often causes gastrointestinal disturbances, particularly diarrhea; compliance is often poor because of the large tablet size and multiple daily dosing. Long-term data have shown that the bisphosphonate ibandronate is well tolerated either intravenously or orally, with a renal safety profile similar to placebo and no evidence of cumulative renal damage. Studies investigating the effects of 15-minute infusions and intensive dosing indicate that intravenous ibandronate given rapidly or at high doses is also well tolerated with no renal safety concerns. Taken together, these results suggest that the favorable safety profile of ibandronate provides an important alternative to existing bisphosphonate options for metastatic bone disease. Using ibandronate could improve patient acceptability and simplify management, with reductions in the need for safety monitoring and management of adverse events.

Rapid administration of ibandronate does not affect renal functioning: evidence from clinical studies in metastatic bone disease and hypercalcaemia of malignancy

Ibandronate is a third-generation aminobisphosphonate that has an excellent safety record in hypercalcaemia of malignancy, and has recently been approved for the prevention of skeletal events from metastatic breast cancer. This paper reviews the safety data from clinical studies of intravenous ibandronate by infusion or injection, focusing on renal adverse events (AEs). In clinical trials of patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, 2-h infusions of ibandronate at doses of up to 6 mg had a low potential for renal events. In a phase III trial of patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer, 6 mg ibandronate infused over 1-2 h had a renal safety profile comparable to that of placebo. In pilot studies, repeated daily infusions of ibandronate (4 mg infused over 2 h for four consecutive days, or 6 mg infused over 1 h for three consecutive days) for severe metastatic bone pain were not associated with any renal AEs. The safety of single 15-min infusions of 6 mg ibandronate has been demonstrated in healthy volunteers and patients with metastatic bone disease from breast cancer or multiple myeloma. Furthermore, single and rapid bolus injections of 2 or 3 mg ibandronate did not increase the risk of renal dysfunction in patients with skeletal metastases. Implications for the renal safety of ibandronate in the management of patients with metastatic bone disease are discussed.

Podocyte injury associated glomerulopathies induced by pamidronate

BACKGROUND

Pamidronate has been demonstrated to decrease bone-related complications in multiple myeloma and delay progression of the disease. This has led to its use in supportive and maintenance therapy of myeloma in conjunction with steroids and chemotherapy. It has also been selectively used in patients with breast cancer and other neoplasms.

METHODS

We report on five patients who developed glomerular disease induced by pamidronate. Pamidronate was the only drug common to all patients. Tests for hepatitis B and C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) were negative for all patients. The first two patients received a high dose of pamidronate for 8 weeks, whereas the other three patients were on monthly therapy for a prolonged period of time. Sources of data included chart review and pathologic analysis of kidney biopsy.

RESULTS

Three patients were female and two were males and all were Caucasian, ranging in age from 58 to 71 years. Renal biopsy findings included minimal change disease in two, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in two, and collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in one. Immunofluorescence was essentially negative in all cases. Electron microscopy showed variable podocyte injury and extensive foot process effacement. There was no evidence of multiple myeloma-related renal disease. After the biopsy, pamidronate was discontinued and renal function stabilized in all patients except the one with the collapsing variant of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis who required hemodialysis. Three patients had resolution of proteinuria, one patient continued to have proteinuria without deterioration in renal function.

CONCLUSION

Pamidronate has been mainly associated with collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. This report expands that relationship and adds other glomerular diseases linked with podocyte injury. Additional studies are needed to define the cause of the variability of renal histology with this agent.

Intravenous bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis: where do we stand?

The use of oral bisphosphonates, particularly members of the aminobisphosphonate subclass, is well established for the treatment of osteoporosis. In a number of clinical settings, intravenous administration appears to be advantageous. However, current dosing and efficacy data are limited while definitive, long-term trials with some of these agents are ongoing. In this article, we review the available information and discuss the use of these drugs on that basis.