Twenty-four-hour blood pressure and heart rate patterns in chronic hemodialysis patients

The complex relationship between CKD and ambulatory blood pressure patterns

Hypertension and CKD frequently coexist, and both are risk factors for cardiovascular events and mortality. Among people with hypertension, the loss of the normal fall in night-time BP, called nondipping, can only be diagnosed by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) and is a risk factor for cardiovascular events. The pathophysiology of nondipping is complex, and CKD is an independent risk factor for nondipping. In fact, nondipping can be seen in as many as 80% of people with CKD. However, the evidence for nondipping as an independent risk factor or causal agent for adverse outcomes in CKD remains mixed. ABPM has been shown to be superior to clinical BP measurement for correlating with end-organ damage and prognosis in CKD. This review covers the evidence for the use of ABPM in CKD, the evidence linking ABPM patterns to outcome in CKD and the evidence for treatment of nondipping in CKD.

Dipper and non-dipper blood pressure 24-hour patterns: circadian rhythm-dependent physiologic and pathophysiologic mechanisms

Neuroendocrine mechanisms are major determinants of the normal 24-h blood pressure (BP) pattern. At the central level, integration of the major driving factors of this temporal variability is mediated by circadian rhythms of monoaminergic systems in conjunction with those of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal, hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid, opioid, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, plus endothelial systems and specific vasoactive peptides. Humoral secretions are typically episodic, coupled either to sleep and/or the circadian endogenous (suprachiasmatic nucleus) central pacemaker clock, but exhibiting also weekly, monthly, seasonal, and annual periodicities. Sleep induction and arousal are influenced also by many hormones and chemical substances that exhibit 24-h variation, e.g., arginine vasopressin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, melatonin, somatotropin, insulin, steroids, serotonin, corticotropin-releasing factor, adrenocorticotropic hormone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, endogenous opioids, and prostaglandin E2, all with established effects on the cardiovascular system. As a consequence, physical, mental, and pathologic stimuli that activate or inhibit neuroendocrine effectors of biological rhythmicity may also interfere with, or modify, the temporal BP structure. Moreover, immediate adjustment to exogenous components/environment demands by BP rhythms is modulated by the circadian-time-dependent responsiveness of biological oscillators and their neuroendocrine effectors. This knowledge contributes to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of abnormalities of the 24-h BP pattern and level and their correction through circadian rhythm-based chronotherapeutic strategies.

The role of clock genes in pharmacology

The physiology of a wide variety of organisms is organized according to periodic environmental changes imposed by the earth's rotation. This way, a large number of physiological processes present diurnal rhythms regulated by an internal timing system called the circadian clock. As part of the rhythmicity in physiology, drug efficacy and toxicity can vary with time. Studies over the past four decades present diurnal oscillations in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. On the other hand, diurnal variations in the availability and sensitivity of drug targets have been correlated with time-dependent changes in drug effectiveness. In this review, we provide evidence supporting the regulation of drug kinetics and dynamics by the circadian clock. We also use the examples of hypertension and cancer to show current achievements and challenges in chronopharmacology.

Circadian variation of blood pressure: the basis for the chronotherapy of hypertension

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements present a close correlation with target organ damage and cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular mortality. With the use of this measurement technique, a significant circadian variation has been shown to characterize BP. This circadian BP variation, although affected by a variety of external factors, represents the influence of internal factors such as ethnicity, gender, autonomic nervous system tone, vasoactive hormones, and hematologic and renal variables. In most individuals, BP presents a morning increase, a small post-prandial valley, and a deeper descent during nocturnal rest. However, under certain pathophysiological conditions, the nocturnal BP decline may be reduced or even reversed. This cannot be determined by traditional clinical or home BP assessments. Subjects with a diminished nocturnal BP decline (non-dipper pattern) have a significantly worse prognosis than the ones with a normal dipper pattern. In particular, the non-dipper circadian BP pattern represents a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, vascular dementia and myocardial infarction. The normalization of the circadian BP pattern to a dipper profile is a novel therapeutic goal, and accumulating medical evidence suggests this can delay the progression towards the renal and cardiovascular pathology known to be a consequence of the non-dipper BP pattern. The features of the circadian BP profile have direct implications for improving the drug-delivery of antihypertensive therapies as well as the qualification of patients for medication trials and assessment.

Pre- and postdialysis blood pressures are imprecise estimates of interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure

BP readings that are obtained in the dialysis unit are commonly used to make therapeutic decisions by clinicians and to predict morbidity and mortality by epidemiologists. Dialysis unit BP are also incorporated in the recent guidelines to target BP control. The magnitude of the difference, overestimation or underestimation, and agreement between dialysis unit BP and ambulatory BP (ABP) are unknown. Articles were selected from Medline to identify those that reported both ABP and dialysis unit BP in hemodialysis patients. Bias was calculated as the difference between dialysis unit and the corresponding ABP. Agreement limits between the BP measurement techniques were assessed by pooled SD of the difference using Bland-Altman methods. Predialysis systolic BP generally overestimated ABP by a variable amount. The heterogeneity between BP measurements did not allow for pooling of the estimates. The agreement limits between the two BP was 41.7 to -25.2 mmHg. Predialysis diastolic BP also generally overestimated the ABP with wide agreement limits (23.7 to -18.9 mmHg). In contrast, postdialysis BP underestimated average ABP with wide agreement limits for both postdialysis systolic BP (33.1 to -36.3 mmHg) and diastolic BP (19.3 to -23.9 mmHg). Dialysis unit BP measurements are imprecise estimates of ABP. Better methods are needed for the assessment of BP in hemodialysis patients for clinical decision making.

Chronotherapy in hypertensive patients: administration-time dependent effects of treatment on blood pressure regulation

Ambulatory blood pressure measurements (ABPM) correlate more closely with target organ damage and cardiovascular events than clinical cuff measurements. ABPM reveals the significant circadian variation in BP, which in most individuals presents a morning increase, small post-prandial decline, and more extensive lowering during nocturnal rest. However, under certain pathophysiological conditions, the nocturnal BP decline may be reduced (nondipper pattern) or even reversed (riser pattern). This is clinically relevant since the nondipper and riser circadian BP patterns constitute a risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria, cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, vascular dementia and myocardial infarction. Hence, there is growing interest in how to best tailor and individualize the treatment of hypertension according to the circadian BP pattern of each patient. Significant administration-time differences in the kinetics and in the beneficial and adverse effects of antihypertensive medications are well known. Thus, bedtime dosing with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) is more effective than morning dosing, while also significantly reducing adverse effects. The therapeutic coverage and efficacy of doxazosin GITS are dependent on the circadian time of drug administration. Moreover, valsartan administration at bedtime, as opposed to upon wakening, results in an improved diurnal/nocturnal BP ratio, increased percentage of controlled patients, and significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive patients. Chronotherapy provides a means of individualizing the treatment of hypertension according to the circadian BP profile of each patient, and constitutes a new option to optimize BP control and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease.

Role of sleep-wake cycle on blood pressure circadian rhythms and hypertension

Stages of different depth characterize the temporal organization of sleep. Each stage exerts an effect on blood pressure (BP) regulation and contributes to its 24-h variation. The main determinant of the circadian influences of sleep and wakefulness on BP is the daytime sympathetic and nighttime parasympathetic prevalence, but many other physiologic mechanisms known either to induce sleep or determine arousal may play an important role in the mediation of sleep influences on BP. Alteration of one or more of such mechanisms may be reflected in altered circadian BP rhythms. Sleep- and arousal-related mechanisms and phenomena that affect circadian BP rhythms include neurohumoral sleep factors (arginine vasopressin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, somatotropin, insulin, steroid hormones and metabolites, and serotonin among others) and waking factors (corticotropin-releasing factor, adrenocorticotropin, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, endogenous opioids, and prostaglandin (E(2))). Pathologic respiratory variations (sleep-disordered breathing) and insomnia are major causes of the sleep-related alteration of the circadian BP profile, including loss of the expected normal decline in BP by 10-20% from the daytime level. A great number of medical disorders can cause insomnia, but objective sleep studies have been performed only in a minority of them. Overall, the sleep-related pathophysiological mechanisms actually involved in causing altered circadian BP rhythms in different normotensive and hypertensive conditions are not completely understood. In any case, changes in the circadian BP rhythm are known to be strongly related to one's risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, thus representing strong prognostic indicators worthy of further investigation.

The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic and end-stage renal disease

In the past 30 years or so, the introduction of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has enabled a more comprehensive estimate of a patient's true blood pressure (BP) and its changes. Although this tool has been used in the general population for the diagnosis of white coat hypertension, its role in the clinical management of patients with chronic and end-stage kidney disease is less well defined. In patients with kidney disease, routine clinic and dialysis center BP measurements may be poor indicators of BP control. Loss of the normal nocturnal decline in BP is also common. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that this loss, which ABPM alone can detect, is associated with poor renal and cardiovascular outcomes. To slow the progression of renal disease and lessen cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with kidney disease, tight BP control is needed. However, the traditional methods of measuring BP intermittently in the medical setting may fail to provide an accurate picture of BP load. Ambulatory or some form of home BP monitoring should be more widely adopted in patients with chronic and end-stage renal disease.

Prognostic value of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and of night/day ratio in nondiabetic, cardiovascular events-free hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is increasing in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients but the prediction power for cardiovascular complications of time-averaged ambulatory blood pressure components has been little investigated in these patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the prognostic power of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in 168 nondiabetic, events-free hemodialysis patients selected from a total dialysis population of about 450 patients.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period (38 +/- 22 months), 48 patients died, 29 of them of cardiovascular causes. On univariate Cox regression analyses, the night/day systolic ratio resulted to be the sole blood pressure indicator to be associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality while left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was a strong predictor of these outcomes. In multivariable Cox models not including LVH, the night/day systolic ratio maintained an independent prognostic value for incident outcomes. However, when both risk factors, LVH and night/day systolic ratio, were introduced into Cox models, LVH was no longer a significant predictor while the night/day systolic ratio became a predictor of marginal statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

The night/day ratio emerges as the sole ambulatory blood pressure monitoring-derived indicator providing significant prognostic information in patients with ESRD. However, this indicator as well as LVH loses substantial prediction power in statistical models including both risk factors. The results suggest that the night/day systolic ratio and LVH provide overlapping prognostic information, a phenomenon in keeping with the hypothesis that they represent a common pathway leading to adverse outcomes in ESRD.

Predictors of progression in hypertensive renal disease in children

In hypertensive renal disease in children, several risk factors influence the development and the rate of progression of renal damage, including blood pressure levels, proteinuria, lipid disorders, and genetic differences. The impact of blood pressure on renal structures, the most important of the factors, depends not only on blood pressure levels, but also on the persistence of the blood pressure levels over time, mainly during the hours when the patient is resting or sleeping. Abnormal circadian variability is frequently observed in patients with renal damage, and nocturnal blood pressure reduction should be a major therapeutic objective to protect against a decline in renal function. Proteinuria is a guide for establishing targets and for monitoring treatment. It should be reduced as much as possible to obtain maximal renoprotective effect. The role of the other factors, such as lipid disorders and genetics, remains elusive.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in chronic renal disease: technical aspects and clinical relevance

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To evaluate the current value of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with chronic renal disease and end-stage renal disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring has become an important tool in hypertension research and clinical practice. Its use in essential hypertension shows a strong predictive ability in the assessment of cardiovascular outcomes. In chronic renal failure and end-stage renal disease, the role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is still being actively evaluated, and available evidence shows that it is better than office blood pressure in predicting left ventricular hypertrophy and progression of renal dysfunction in patients with chronic renal failure. In end-stage renal disease, preliminary data suggest better prediction of mortality in hemodialysis patients in comparison with clinic blood pressures. The most conspicuous problems with the literature on this subject are small sample sizes and the paucity of longitudinal observational studies and intervention trials.

SUMMARY

Preliminary data and extrapolations from essential hypertension have justified a growing excitement about the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in renal disease. However, further research will have to address the limitations of the available literature before generalization of its use is implemented.

Nocturnal non-dipping: what does it augur?

The non-dipping pattern of blood pressure (defined as a nocturnal fall of less than 10%) occurs in about 25% of hypertensives, with increased prevalence in certain sub-groups such as diabetics, African-Americans, and patients with renal disease. It almost certainly has multiple causes, including factors such as the levels of activity and arousal during both the day and the night, the depth and quality of sleep, and the activity of the sympathetic nervous system, among others. In patients with uncomplicated hypertension, the reproducibility is relatively low. There is evidence suggesting that the non-dipping pattern may have an adverse prognosis: thus, it appears to predict the progression of renal disease, to be associated with increased target-organ damage (in some studies), and also to predict increased cardiovascular morbidity. Antihypertensive drug treatment can normalize the non-dipping pattern, but the therapeutic consequences of this are unknown.

Effects of normal hematocrit on ambulatory blood pressure in epoetin-treated hemodialysis patients with cardiac disease

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is a recognized complication of partial correction of anemia with recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) in hemodialysis patients. We used interdialytic ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring to study the effects of partially corrected anemia versus normal hematocrit (hct) on BP in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

Repeated interdialytic ABP monitoring was performed for up to one year in 28 chronic hemodialysis patients with cardiac disease who were randomized to achieve and maintain normal hct levels (42 +/- 3%, group A) or anemic hct levels (30 +/- 3%, group B) with epoetin. Routine BP measurements obtained at dialysis treatments were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean hct levels were 30.7 +/- 0.7% in group A and 30.6 +/- 0.7% in group B at baseline, then 39.3 +/- 1.2% (group A) and 33.5 +/- 0.6% (group B) at four months, and 42.0 +/- 1.1% (group A) and 30.4 +/- 1.0% (group B) at 12 months. Baseline ABP and routine dialysis unit BP levels were not different between the groups. At 2, 4, 8, and 12 months of follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in any BP parameters between groups or increases in any BP parameters in either group A or group B patients compared with baseline. At 12 months, the mean nighttime diastolic BP (DBP) in group A patients was slightly but significantly lower than the mean daytime DBP (daytime DBP 76.6 +/- 1.9 mm Hg vs. nighttime DBP 72.9 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P < 0.05). The mean daytime and nighttime BPs were not different from each other at two, four, and eight months in group A or at any time in group B, and in both groups, most patients had little diurnal change in BP.

CONCLUSION

Correction of hct to normal with epoetin in chronic hemodialysis patients with cardiac disease did not cause increased BP as assessed by interdialytic ABP monitoring or by the measurement of routine predialysis and postdialysis BP. There was little diurnal change in systolic or diastolic BP at baseline or after correction of anemia to normal levels, and although mean nighttime DBP was lower than mean daytime DBP at 12 months in group A, the maintenance of normal hct levels did not affect the abnormal diurnal BP pattern seen at moderately anemic hct levels in most patients.

Nocturnal hypoxemia, night-day arterial pressure changes and left ventricular geometry in dialysis patients

It is well established that nocturnal hypoxemia in sleep apnea causes an inversion of the circadian arterial pressure rhythm and triggers nocturnal hypertension. Since sleep apnea is very frequent in dialysis patients, we hypothesized that nocturnal hypoxemia may be a factor that contributes to alter the 24-hour arterial pressure profile in these patients. To test the hypothesis 32 dialysis patients underwent 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring and continuous monitoring of arterial O2 saturation during the night-time. Hemodialysis patients were studied during the non-dialysis day. All patients underwent an echocardiographic study. Thirteen patients had no episode of nocturnal hypoxemia (group I), 7 had at least one episode overnight but less than 2 episodes/hr (group II) and 12 had > or = 2 episodes/hr (group III). The average daytime systolic pressure was similar in the three groups. However, the average nocturnal systolic pressure fell in the first group (-2.5 +/- 4.2%) and rose in the second (+2.0 +/- 3.6%) and in the third (+3.9 +/- 2.2%) group (one way ANOVA, P < 0.005). The relative wall thickness of the left ventricle (RWT) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in group III than in group I, and in the aggregate (N = 32) there was an inverse relationship between average nocturnal SaO2 and RWT (r = -0.43, P = 0.015). The proportion of patients with concentric remodeling or concentric hypertrophy was higher (P = 0.05) in the group with a more severe degree of nocturnal hypoxemia (group III, 8 of 12) than in the other two groups (group I, 3 of 13; group II, 2 of 7). Nocturnal hypoxemia is associated with the "non-dipping" arterial pressure profile in dialysis patients. Disturbed respiratory control during the night may represent an important cardiovascular risk factor in dialysis patients.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in dialysis patients and estimation of mean interdialytic blood pressure

To define blood pressure (BP) patterns and control in dialysis patients, 48-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed in 36 hemodialysis and 18 peritoneal dialysis patients. Monitoring began during a dialysis session for hemodialysis patients. Data revealed significantly lower diastolic BP (DBP) and lower diastolic load (percentage of diastolic values > 90 mm Hg) in hemodialysis patients compared with peritoneal dialysis patients (80.6 mm Hg v 88.8 mm Hg, respectively, [P < 0.03] and 26% v 45%, respectively [P < 0.03]) for the 48-hour period. When the 2 days were analyzed separately, the difference in diastolic pressures and loads was significant only for the first (dialysis) day. Similarly, trends toward lower systolic BP (SBP) and systolic load in hemodialysis patients existed throughout monitoring and were greater in magnitude during the first day. BP data were fit to a random-coefficient growth curve model to detect periodicity. This sensitive model did not detect diurnal variation of BP in either group. The incidence of hypotension did not differ between the two groups (2.0% v 1.0% of total observations, hemodialysis v peritoneal dialysis). In the hemodialysis group, the proportion of hypotensive observations was significantly greater during the 4 hours postdialysis compared with other periods (5.6% v 1.6%; P < 0.02), a finding that likely reflects the practice of holding antihypertensives until after hemodialysis. However, patient diaries did not reflect hypotensive symptoms during this time. In the hemodialysis group, mean BP and predialysis BP did not correlate with interdialytic sodium load or weight gain. Predialysis and postdialysis BP (recorded by dialysis nurses) correlated significantly with mean BP. Predialysis SBP overestimated mean SBP by an average of 10 mm Hg, while postdialysis SBP underestimated mean SBP by an average of 7 mm Hg. To create formulas to estimate mean SBP and DBP in hemodialysis patients, multiple linear regression was used to model these variables against age, sex, race, and average prehemodialysis/posthemodialysis BP. The model achieved a high degree of fit (r2 = 0.72 for SBP; r2 = 0.65 for DBP), demonstrating that prehemodialysis and posthemodialysis BP can be used to predict mean BP in hemodialysis patients. In summary, our data show the absence of a diurnal variation of BP in dialysis patients and lower BP in hemodialysis patients compared with peritoneal dialysis patients. Among hemodialysis patients, more hypotension occurred after dialysis compared with other periods, and predialysis and postdialysis BP can be used to model mean BP levels.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in renal dialysis and transplant patients

Blood pressure (BP) elevation and left ventricular hypertrophy are important factors in the high cardiovascular mortality rate in patients on the renal replacement program. Ambulatory BP monitoring is widely regarded as superior to random BP monitoring in predicting end-organ damage from elevated BP. One hundred seventeen patients (60 on hemodialysis [35 with long sessions and 25 with short sessions], 29 on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, and 28 transplant recipients) underwent ambulatory BP monitoring, with target organ assessment by electrocardiography. Mean 24-hour BP for the patients with the long hemodialysis sessions (LHD) was 115.5/66.6 mm Hg, without the regular use of antihypertensive drugs. The parathormone (PTH) level was the major determinant of BP on ambulatory BP monitoring analysis, with interdialytic weight gain and age each having weaker associations. The BPs of the other three patient cohorts were much higher (short hemodialysis session [SHD], 143.2/82.1 mm Hg; continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, 137.1/76.8 mm Hg; transplant recipients, 135.9/79.2 mm Hg). Overall, two thirds of the patients had reduced diurnal BP variability. Electrocardiogram voltage criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy were exceeded in approximately one third to one half of the patients. Our findings show that good control of BP is possible without recourse to antihypertensive drugs in the context of dialysis with slow ultrafiltration.

Pharmacokinetics and cardiovascular effects of ma-huang (Ephedra sinica) in normotensive adults

The purpose of this study was to evaluate heart rate and blood pressure responses to a commercially available source of ma-haung, a natural source of the sympathomimetic substance, ephedrine, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of the product in normotensive, healthy adults. On day 1, twelve study participants were monitored with an ambulatory blood pressure device between hours 7 and 20. On day 2, they ingested four capsules of powdered ma-huang at hours 8 and 17 while again wearing the monitor between hours 7 and 20. Serial plasma samples were obtained and concentrations of ephedrine were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of ephedrine were determined from plasma concentration-time profiles. The ephedrine alkaloid content of each capsule was also determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Six participants experienced a statistically significant increase in heart rate, but the effects on blood pressure were variable. The half-life, volume of distribution, clearance, and maximum concentration in plasma of ephedrine in the ma-huang product were similar to values previously reported for a 20 mg, immediate-release ephedrine tablet. Values for the absorption rate were considerably lower and time to reach maximum concentration was longer for the capsules, compared with the standard tablet. Variability in alkaloid content of ephedrine was low and yielded a mean dose of ephedrine at 19.4 mg; pseudoephedrine at 4.9 mg; and methylephedrine at 1.2 mg for a four-capsule dose. In summary, ma-haung had variable effects on blood pressure and increased heart rate in healthy, normotensive adults. Pharmacokinetic parameters for ephedrine were in agreement with those previously reported; however, the absorption rate was much slower after ingestion of ma-huang.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Application to clinical medicine and antihypertension medication trials

The wide use of ABPM has resulted in greater appreciation of the circadian time structure of BP variability and its clinical relevance. It is now recognized that the day-night change in BP results from an interplay of circadian rhythms in neurohumoral mechanisms coupled with temporal patterns in physical activity and mental load. The composite effect and balance of these endogenous and exogenous cyclic phenomena give rise to elevated BP during diurnal activity and reduced BP during nighttime repose in both normotension and uncomplicated essential hypertension. The balance is frequently disturbed in complicated and secondary forms of hypertension causing gross alteration of the 24-hour BP profile. ABPM also reveals the efficiency of antihypertensive treatment throughout the 24 hours and as a function of drug administration time. The pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics of antihypertensive medications have been demonstrated to vary with ingestion time. Such time-dependencies arise from circadian rhythms in BP and underlying mechanisms. The effect of antihypertensive medications is not simply superimposed upon endogenous bioperiodicities. Rhythms in neurohumoral mechanisms of BP control may modulate treatment effect. Certain aspects of the shape of the 24-hour BP profile, such as the magnitude of the morning surge and nocturnal decrease, have been implicated as determinants of morbid and mortal cardiovascular events. One large clinical multicenter investigation, known as the CONVINCE (Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Clinical Endpoints) trial, is aimed at assessing the impact (cardiovascular morbidity and mortality) of verapamil chronotherapy over standard diuretic or beta anatagonist treatment in hypertensive patients with at least one risk factor of coronary heart disease. ABPM will help ascertain to what extent depression of the morning surge in BP relates to reduction in cardiac morbidity and mortality in this as well as other such trials. In any event, the importance of ABPM and the indices derived from its application are just beginning to be appreciated and explored.

Circadian blood pressure variation versus renal function

Several published reports describe an abnormal circadian blood pressure profile in chronic renal failure subjects. Factors other than renal failure, including age, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, autonomic dysfunction, and race, also may affect circadian blood pressure profiles. To further elucidate the relationship between renal function and circadian blood pressure variation, we compared day/night circadian blood pressure changes in three groups of male veteran hypertensive patients: group A, creatinine clearance (CC) > 80 mL/min, n = 20; group B, CC 20 to 80 mL/min, n = 19; and group C, CC < 20 mL/min, n = 14. We use postural changes in catecholamines, renin, and aldosterone as a measure of autonomic function. No significant difference in day/night percent change in systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure (MAP), or heart rate was seen by renal function group. Regression analysis using age, diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, postural hormonal changes, and creatinine clearance found race to be the only significant predictor of the day/night percent change in MAP (P < 0.05). Compared with whites, black subjects had higher nocturnal heart rates (P = 0.01); smaller day/night heart rate changes (P = 0.03); significantly higher diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.01); and a trend toward smaller day/night change in diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.06). In conclusion, renal function level does not influence day/night blood pressure changes. The blunting or reversal of the normal circadian blood pressure pattern seen in some chronic renal failure hypertensive subjects may be attributable to the association between chronic renal failure and cofactors associated with abnormal circadian blood pressure, including black race and possibly severity of atherosclerosis.

[Erythropoietin and arterial hypertension in patients with chronic renal insufficiency]

The induction or the aggravation of a hypertension is a side effect of recombinant human erythropoietin therapy in 30% of dialysed patients. Clinical manifestations can be severe. Pathogenesis of erythropoietin-induced hypertension is ill known. Peripheral vascular changes were found in most studies. Recently, it was demonstrated that erythropoietin increased endothelin-1 release by endothelial cells. Ambulatory blood pressure recording seems to be the best method for evaluating the modification of blood pressure profile during the interdialytic period. Erythropoietin-induced hypertension is easily controlled by drugs, but also by low dose of erythropoietin. Subcutaneous administration of erythropoietin is an approach to avoid the induction of hypertension. Furthermore economical advantages of subcutaneous administration are proven.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in paediatric patients treated by regular haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has been shown to be more representative of blood pressure (BP) levels than casual BP measurements in adult patients treated by haemodialysis (HD). In this study we compared ABPM using the oscillometric SpaceLabs 90207 monitor with casual BP measurements in 35 paediatric patients [17 treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 18 by HD]. Heart rate and plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide were also measured. No correlations were found between ABPM and causal BP measurements, except for systolic day-time BP in PD patients (r = 0.63). Seventy percent of PD and 33% of HD patients were regarded as hypertensive when evaluated by ABPM, while casual BP measurements demonstrated hypertension in 47% (P < 0.05) of PD patients and in 44% (NS) of HD patients. One-third of patients were reclassified by ABPM either from normotensive to hypertensive (7/19) or from hypertensive to normotensive (5/16). BP assessed by ABPM was higher in PD than in HD patients. The physiological decline of BP at night was significant and more pronounced in PD than in HD patients. In HD patients day-time BP did not differ between the 1st and the 2nd interdialytic day, but increased in the night hours before the following dialysis session. A positive correlation was found between day-time BP and pre-dialysis plasma atrial natriuretic peptide in both treatment groups. In conclusion this study demonstrates that casual BP recordings are not representative of average BP in dialysed paediatric patients. ABPM is useful in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension in children with end-stage renal disease.