Calcium acetate control of serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients

New Directions in Phosphorus Management in Dialysis

Current phosphate management strategies in end-stage renal disease (dietary phosphate restriction, dialysis, and phosphate binders) are inadequate to maintain target phosphate levels in most patients. Dietary phosphate restriction is challenging due to "hidden phosphates" in processed foods, and dialysis and phosphate binders are insufficient to match average dietary phosphate intake. As phosphate binders must be taken with each meal, patients need to ingest many, large pills several times a day, negatively impacting quality of life. Recent advances in our understanding of phosphate absorption pathways have led to the development of new nonbinder therapies that block phosphate absorption. This review describes the limitations of current phosphate management strategies and discusses new therapies in development that inhibit phosphate absorption pathways. These new therapies present an opportunity to rethink phosphate management, potentially by prescribing phosphate absorption inhibitors as a primary therapy and adding phosphate binders if needed.

Phosphate Frustration: Treatment Options to Complement Current Therapies

Hyperphosphatemia eventually develops in almost all patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and is associated with negative clinical outcomes. Thus, guidelines recommend targeting treatment to normal phosphate levels in patients with chronic kidney disease. Despite low phosphorus diets, clearance by dialysis, and phosphate binder use, many patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis are unable to consistently achieve and maintain serum phosphate concentrations <5.5 mg/dL. A chart audit of patients on dialysis receiving phosphate binders showed that 74 to 86% were unable to consistently achieve serum phosphate ≤5.5 mg/dL over 6 months. Furthermore, although there is evidence that serum phosphate concentrations <4.5 mg/dL are associated with improved survival and cardiovascular outcomes, real-world phosphate control data suggest achieving and maintaining this goal for most patients would be extremely challenging, if not near impossible, using current therapies. As phosphate binders can only remove approximately 300 mg of the 2,500 mg or more daily dietary phosphate intake, therapeutic innovations are necessary to improve phosphate management. We present treatment options to complement current therapies including tenapanor, a novel sodium/hydrogen exchanger isoform 3 inhibitor that blocks the dominant paracellular phosphate absorption pathway and has been shown to reduce phosphate levels in several clinical trials.

Effectiveness of phosphate binders in adult patients with end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the review was to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of phosphate binders on mortality and serum levels of phosphorus, calcium and parathyroid hormone in adult patients with end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis compared to hemodialysis with no phosphate binder use.

INTRODUCTION

End stage renal disease leading to hemodialysis is a common global health issue. Effective management of this population is focused on balancing alterations in bone mineral markers such as phosphorus, calcium and parathyroid hormone. Chronic imbalances are associated with all-cause mortality. Phosphate binders are a crucial element to regulating these levels.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The review considered studies including adult patients, age 18 and over, receiving hemodialysis. The intervention of interest was the use of any drug within the class of phosphate binders. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and serum levels of phosphorus, calcium and parathyroid hormone. Experimental and quasi-experimental study designs were considered.

METHODS

A search for relevant published and unpublished literature was conducted through November 5, 2017. Databases searched included PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), in addition to gray literature sources. Articles that met the inclusion criteria were further assessed for methodological validity by two independent reviewers using the standard critical appraisal instruments from Joanna Briggs Institute. Data were extracted from papers included in the review using the standardized data extraction tool from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Quantitative data were pooled for statistical meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of phosphate binders on phosphorus and calcium.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included in this review. A meta-analysis of four studies showed that the use of phosphate binders resulted in a statistically significant decrease in phosphorus levels compared to placebo (mean difference -1.89 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval -2.03 mg/dL, -1.75 mg/dL); three additional studies described narratively also showed a statistically significant decrease in phosphorus. A meta-analysis of three studies showed a statistically significant increase in calcium compared to placebo (mean difference 0.57 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval 0.50 mg/dL, 0.64 mg/dL); two additional studies described narratively showed no difference in effect on calcium. Of the three studies that measured parathyroid hormone, one showed a statistically significant improvement with the use of phosphate binders (mean difference -83.0 pg/mL, 95% confidence interval -154.63 pg/mL, -11.37 pg/mL) and two showed no difference in effect. No studies measured mortality.

CONCLUSION

Phosphate binders are effective in reducing serum phosphorus. The findings on parathyroid hormone and calcium did not provide adequate support for phosphate binder use. The impact on mortality was not directly measured in any of the included studies.

Sevelamer Hydrochloride versus Aluminum Hydroxide: Effect on Serum Phosphorus and Lipids in CAPD Patients

Background

Dietary phosphorus restriction, oral administration of phosphorus binders, and dialysis are the main strategies to control hyperphosphatemia in patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Aluminum hydroxide (AH) and calcium carbonate, the most commonly used phosphorus binders, have serious disadvantages, such as aluminum toxicity and hypercalcemia. Sevelamer hydrochloride (SH) is a relatively new nonabsorbed calcium- and aluminum-free phosphorus binder. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of SH in the control of hyperphosphatemia and its effect, compared to AH, on serum lipid parameters in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Methods

30 stable patients on CAPD were included in an open-label, randomized crossover study. After a 2-week phosphorus binder washout period, 15 patients (group I) were administered SH for 8 weeks and in the remaining patients (group II), AH was introduced (phase A). After a new 2-week washout period, patients crossed over to the alternate agent for another 8 weeks (phase B).

Results

There were similar reductions in serum phosphorus levels over the course of the study with both agents: by 1.18 ± 0.07 mg/dL (0.38 ± 0.03 mmol/L) with SH and by 1.25 ± 0.15 mg/dL (0.40 ± 0.05 mmol/L) with AH in phase A ( p = NS), and by 1.35 ± 0.25 mg/dL (0.43 ± 0.08 mmol/L) with AH and by 1.23 ± 0.80 mg/dL (0.39 ± 0.25 mmol/L) with SH in phase B ( p = NS). Moreover, SH administration was associated with a 10.5% ± 9.4% and a 20.1% ± 6.8% fall in total cholesterol ( p < 0.05) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( p < 0.001) in phase A, and 11.9% ± 7.2% ( p < 0.05) and 21.5% ± 2.4% ( p < 0.001), respectively, in phase B. In both phases of the study, AH administration was not followed by a significant change in serum lipid parameters.

Conclusion

Sevelamer hydrochloride is a well-tolerated alternative to calcium- or aluminum-containing phosphorus binder in the control of serum phosphorus in CAPD patients. Furthermore, SH improves the lipid profile in these patients.

Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD)

BACKGROUND

Phosphate binders are used to reduce positive phosphate balance and to lower serum phosphate levels for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with the aim to prevent progression of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of phosphate binders for people with CKD with particular reference to relevant biochemical end-points, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular morbidity, hospitalisation, and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 July 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of adults with CKD of any GFR category comparing a phosphate binder to another phosphate binder, placebo or usual care to lower serum phosphate. Outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, adverse events, vascular calcification and bone fracture, and surrogates for such outcomes including serum phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and FGF23.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted study data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool and used the GRADE process to assess evidence certainty. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 104 studies involving 13,744 adults. Sixty-nine new studies were added to this 2018 update.Most placebo or usual care controlled studies were among participants with CKD G2 to G5 not requiring dialysis (15/25 studies involving 1467 participants) while most head to head studies involved participants with CKD G5D treated with dialysis (74/81 studies involving 10,364 participants). Overall, seven studies compared sevelamer with placebo or usual care (667 participants), seven compared lanthanum to placebo or usual care (515 participants), three compared iron to placebo or usual care (422 participants), and four compared calcium to placebo or usual care (278 participants). Thirty studies compared sevelamer to calcium (5424 participants), and fourteen studies compared lanthanum to calcium (1690 participants). No study compared iron-based binders to calcium. The remaining studies evaluated comparisons between sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate), sevelamer plus calcium, lanthanum, iron (ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, stabilised polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide), calcium (acetate, ketoglutarate, carbonate), bixalomer, colestilan, magnesium (carbonate), magnesium plus calcium, aluminium hydroxide, sucralfate, the inhibitor of phosphate absorption nicotinamide, placebo, or usual care without binder. In 82 studies, treatment was evaluated among adults with CKD G5D treated with haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, while in 22 studies, treatment was evaluated among participants with CKD G2 to G5. The duration of study follow-up ranged from 8 weeks to 36 months (median 3.7 months). The sample size ranged from 8 to 2103 participants (median 69). The mean age ranged between 42.6 and 68.9 years.Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were low risk in 25 and 15 studies, respectively. Twenty-seven studies reported low risk methods for blinding of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. Thirty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias and 69 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias.In CKD G2 to G5, compared with placebo or usual care, sevelamer, lanthanum, iron and calcium-based phosphate binders had uncertain or inestimable effects on death (all causes), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. Sevelamer may lead to constipation (RR 6.92, CI 2.24 to 21.4; low certainty) and lanthanum (RR 2.98, CI 1.21 to 7.30, moderate certainty) and iron-based binders (RR 2.66, CI 1.15 to 6.12, moderate certainty) probably increased constipation compared with placebo or usual care. Lanthanum may result in vomiting (RR 3.72, CI 1.36 to 10.18, low certainty). Iron-based binders probably result in diarrhoea (RR 2.81, CI 1.18 to 6.68, high certainty), while the risks of other adverse events for all binders were uncertain.In CKD G5D sevelamer may lead to lower death (all causes) (RR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.91, low certainty) and induce less hypercalcaemia (RR 0.30, CI 0.20 to 0.43, low certainty) when compared with calcium-based binders, and has uncertain or inestimable effects on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. The finding of lower death with sevelamer compared with calcium was present when the analysis was restricted to studies at low risk of bias (RR 0.50, CI 0.32 to 0.77). In absolute terms, sevelamer may lower risk of death (all causes) from 210 per 1000 to 105 per 1000 over a follow-up of up to 36 months, compared to calcium-based binders. Compared with calcium-based binders, lanthanum had uncertain effects with respect to all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification and probably had reduced risks of treatment-related hypercalcaemia (RR 0.16, CI 0.06 to 0.43, low certainty). There were no head-to-head studies of iron-based binders compared with calcium. The paucity of placebo-controlled studies in CKD G5D has led to uncertainty about the effects of phosphate binders on patient-important outcomes compared with placebo.It is uncertain whether the effects of binders on clinically-relevant outcomes were different for patients who were and were not treated with dialysis in subgroup analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In studies of adults with CKD G5D treated with dialysis, sevelamer may lower death (all causes) compared to calcium-based binders and incur less treatment-related hypercalcaemia, while we found no clinically important benefits of any phosphate binder on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture or coronary artery calcification. The effects of binders on patient-important outcomes compared to placebo are uncertain. In patients with CKD G2 to G5, the effects of sevelamer, lanthanum, and iron-based phosphate binders on cardiovascular, vascular calcification, and bone outcomes compared to placebo or usual care, are also uncertain and they may incur constipation, while iron-based binders may lead to diarrhoea.

Hyperphosphatemia in Dialysis Patients: The Therapeutic Role of Lanthanum Carbonate

Phosphate overload is a dramatic consequence in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Recent studies have well documented that abnormalities in mineral and bone metabolism in these patients are associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Elevated serum phosphate and calcium-phosphate product levels play an important role in the pathogenesis of secondary hyperparathyroidism and extra-skeletal calcification in dialysis patients. Furthermore, inorganic phosphate may cause vascular calcification directly through a real “ossification” of the tunica media in the vasculature of ESRD patients.

The “classical” treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism and hyperphosphatemia in ESRD patients consists of either calcium- or aluminum-based phosphate binders and calcitriol administration. Unfortunately, this “old generation” therapy is not free of complications. This review paper suggests that new calcium- and aluminum-free phosphate binders, such as lanthanum carbonate, can be used to treat hyperphosphatemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism in ESRD patients.

Secondary Hyperparthyroidism: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies

Uremic secondary hyperparathyroidism is a multifactorial and complex disease often present in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease. The accumulation of phosphate, the increased FGF23 levels, the reduction in active vitamin D production, and the tendency to hypocalcemia are persistent stimuli for the development and progression of parathyroid hyperplasia with increased secretion of PTH. Parathyroid proliferation may become nodular mainly in cases of advanced hyperparathyroidism. The alterations in the regulation of mineral metabolism, the development of bone disease and extraosseous calcifications are essential components of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder and have been associated with negative outcomes. The management of hyperparathyroidism includes the correction of vitamin D deficiency and control of serum phosphorus and PTH without inducing hypercalcemia. An update of the leading therapeutic tools available for the prevention and clinical management of secondary hyperparathyroidism, its diagnosis, and the main mechanisms and factors involved in the pathogenesis of the disease will be described in this review.

Calcium acetate or calcium carbonate for hyperphosphatemia of hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High levels of serum phosphorus both at baseline and during follow-up are associated with increased mortality in dialysis patients, and administration of phosphate binders was independently associated with improved survival among hemodialysis population. Calcium-based phosphate binders are the most commonly used phosphate binders in developing countries for their relatively low costs.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety between calcium carbonate and calcium acetate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google scholar and Chinese databases (Wanfang, Weipu, National Knowledge Infrastructure of China) were searched for relevant studies published before March 2014. Reference lists of nephrology textbooks and review articles were checked. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that assessed the effects and adverse events of calcium acetate and calcium carbonate in adult patients with MHD was performed using Review Manager 5.0.

RESULTS

A total of ten studies (625 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. There was insufficient data in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events for meta-analysis. Compared with calcium carbonate group, the serum phosphorus was significantly lower in calcium acetate group after4 weeks' administration (MD -0.15 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.01) and after 8 weeks' administration (MD -0.25 mmol/L, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.11). There was no difference in serum calcium levels or the incidence of hypercalcemia between two groups at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. No statistical difference was found in parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels or serum calcium by phosphorus (Ca x P) product. There was significantly higher risk of intolerance with calcium acetate treatment (RR 3.46, 95% CI 1.48 to 8.26).

CONCLUSIONS

For hyperphosphatemia treatment, calcium acetate showed better efficacy and with a higher incidence of intolerance compared with calcium carbonate. There are insufficient data to establish the comparative superiority of the two calcium-based phosphate binders on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular end-points in hemodialysis patients.

Non-calcium-containing phosphate binders: comparing efficacy, safety, and other clinical effects

Phosphate-binder therapy for hyperphosphataemia is key to the treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)-mineral and bone disorder (MBD). Calcium-free phosphate binders are increasingly favoured since calcium-based agents potentially cause harmful calcium overload and vascular calcification that confound the benefits of reducing serum phosphorus. Several calcium-free phosphate binders are available, including the non-absorbed agent sevelamer and the absorbed agents, e.g. lanthanum and magnesium salts. Randomised controlled studies consistently show that sevelamer and lanthanum carbonate offer equivalent lowering of serum phosphorus and often effectively achieve phosphorus targets versus calcium salts, with sevelamer having a positive effect on bone disease, vascular calcification, and patient-level outcomes in dialysis patients in several trials. There is also evidence that lanthanum carbonate can improve bone health, but data are limited to its effects to vascular calcification or patient-level outcomes. Magnesium salts have also been shown to reduce serum phosphorus levels, but clear evidence is lacking on bone, vascular, or clinical outcomes. It also remains to be established whether long-term systemic accumulation of lanthanum and magnesium, in tissues including bone, has clinically relevant toxic effects. This review summarises the evidence of efficacy and safety for newer calcium-free phosphate binders in CKD-MBD management.

Derangements in phosphate metabolism in chronic kidney diseases/endstage renal disease: therapeutic considerations

The changes in phosphate (PO(4)) metabolism across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and specific strategies to address these abnormalities by reducing PO(4) loads are discussed in this review. This review also addresses briefly the evidence for specific PO(4) serum targets in CKD and endstage renal disease (ESRD) and the potential for other biomarkers such as fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) to define disease and monitor the effectiveness of therapy. As renal function declines, single nephron excretion of PO(4) must increase to maintain PO(4) balance. Abnormalities in PO(4) metabolism occur early in CKD. Compensatory changes in renal PO(4) handling are sufficient to maintain a normal serum PO(4) level in early stages of CKD, but in more advanced CKD, these processes no longer suffice and overt hyperphosphatemia develops. The resulting increased PO(4) burden contributes directly to development of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The FGF-23 increases early in CKD, likely in response to abnormal PO(4) metabolism, and mediates processes that help restore serum PO(4) levels to normal in CKD stage 3 and in early stage 4. The increased PO(4) burden and subsequent overt hyperphosphatemia are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Dietary PO(4) restriction, modification of dialysis prescriptions, and administration of oral PO(4) binders can restore PO(4) balance. As CKD progresses, population-based studies demonstrate that diet alone is typically not able to prevent or treat hyperphosphatemia. Dialysis modalities that are currently used often fail to remove sufficient PO(4) to prevent hyperphosphatemia in patients with an inadequately controlled dietary PO(4) load. This is particularly likely among patients without significant residual renal function. Thus, in the majority of ESRD patients, PO(4) binders remain the mainstay of therapy for hyperphosphatemia. All currently available PO(4) binders can restore serum PO(4) to the required level when administered appropriately and in conjunction with dietary PO(4) restrictions. PO(4) binders differ regarding their potential side-effects and impact on long-term patient-centered outcomes. Which of the PO(4) binders might result in the most favorable survival and cardiovascular morbidity profiles and which remain uncertain, remains a subject of considerable clinical investigation. Compelling observational and more limited randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence support the view that PO(4) binders might differ in their effects on mortality and/or morbidity. The limited evidence from RCTs is mostly congruent with the findings from large observational studies. In particular, evidences from both epidemiologic and RCT support the view that excess calcium administration may independently increase the risk of cardiovascular disease in individuals with normal renal function and in patients with CKD and ESRD. Additional RCT evidence might help determine the degree at which any increased risk from oral calcium exposure can be mitigated with the use of noncalcium-based PO(4) binders. Judicious control of PO(4) early in CKD, possibly monitored by measures of FGF-23, could potentially reduce the risk of development of renal secondary hyperparathyroidism and all of the adverse clinical consequences of poorly controlled CKD-mineral and bone disorder. The mainstays of therapy are likely to include a balance of dietary restriction and PO(4) binders to reduce PO(4) input, and in ESRD patients, dialysis modalities to augment PO(4) output.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of calcium acetate on serum phosphorus concentrations in patients with advanced non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

Background

Hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) contributes to secondary hyperparathyroidism, soft tissue calcification, and increased mortality risk. This trial was conducted to examine the efficacy and safety of calcium acetate in controlling serum phosphorus in pre-dialysis patients with CKD.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 110 nondialyzed patients from 34 sites with estimated GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² and serum phosphorus > 4.5 mg/dL were randomized to calcium acetate or placebo for 12 weeks. The dose of study drugs was titrated to achieve target serum phosphorus of 2.7-4.5 mg/dL. Serum phosphorus, calcium, iPTH, bicarbonate and serum albumin were measured at baseline and every 2 weeks for the 12 week study period. The primary efficacy endpoint was serum phosphorus at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were to measure serum calcium and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels.

Results

At 12 weeks, serum phosphorus concentration was significantly lower in the calcium acetate group compared to the placebo group (4.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL vs. 5.1 ± 1.4 mg/dL; p = 0.04). The albumin-adjusted serum calcium concentration was significantly higher (9.5 ± 0.8 vs. 8.8 ± 0.8; p < 0.001) and iPTH was significantly lower in the calcium acetate group compared to placebo (150 ± 157 vs. 351 ± 292 pg/mL respectively; p < 0.001). At 12 weeks, the proportions of subjects who had hypocalcemia were 5.4% and 19.5% for the calcium acetate and the placebo groups, respectively, while the proportions of those with hypercalcemia were 13.5% and 0%, respectively. Adverse events did not differ between the treatment groups.

Conclusions

In CKD patients not yet on dialysis, calcium acetate was effective in reducing serum phosphorus and iPTH over a 12 week period.

Trial Registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00211978.

Phosphate binders for preventing and treating bone disease in chronic kidney disease patients

BACKGROUND

Phosphate binders are widely used to lower serum phosphorus levels in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) but their impact in CKD remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To review the effects of various phosphate binders on biochemical and patient-level end-points in CKD stages 3 to 5D.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In March 2010 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register and CENTRAL for relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs that assessed the effects of various phosphate binders in adults with CKD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently reviewed search results and extracted data. Results were expressed as mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty studies (7631 participants) were included. There was no significant reduction in all-cause mortality (10 studies, 3079 participants: RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.16), or serum calcium by phosphorus (Ca x P) product with sevelamer hydrochloride compared to calcium-based agents. There was a significant reduction in serum phosphorus (16 studies, 3126 participants: MD 0.23 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.42) and parathyroid hormone (PTH) (12 studies, 2551 participants; MD 56 pg/mL, 95% CI 26 to 84) but a significant increase in the risk of hypercalcaemia (12 studies, 1144 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.59) with calcium-based agents compared to sevelamer hydrochloride. There was a significant increase in the risk of adverse gastrointestinal events with sevelamer hydrochloride in comparison to calcium salts (5 studies, 498 participants: RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.25). Compared with calcium-based agents, lanthanum significantly reduced serum calcium (2 studies, 122 participants: MD -0.30 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.25) and the Ca x P product, but not serum phosphorus levels. The effects of calcium acetate on biochemical end-points were similar to those of calcium carbonate. The phosphorus lowering effects of novel agents such as ferric citrate, colestilan and niacinamide were only reported in a few studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Available phosphate-binding agents have been shown to reduce phosphorus levels in comparison to placebo. However, there are insufficient data to establish the comparative superiority of novel non-calcium binding agents over calcium-containing phosphate binders for patient-level outcomes such as all-cause mortality and cardiovascular end-points in CKD.

Comparative effectiveness of calcium-containing phosphate binders in incident U.S. dialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Few studies have assessed the association between phosphate binder use and hard outcomes in dialysis patients. Furthermore, the comparative effectiveness of calcium carbonate and acetate is untested. We studied the association between use versus nonuse of calcium-containing phosphate binders (CCPBs) and mortality from any cause. We also tested whether mortality differed among users of individual CCPBs.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

A nationally representative prospective cohort of incident U.S. dialysis patients (1996 to 1997), assembled before the availability of sevelamer and lanthanum, was used. Use of each CCPB was ascertained from chart abstraction records. A large number of sociodemographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics were available for confounding control in multivariate and propensity score-matched Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among 3603 incident dialysis patients, 77.5% used a CCPB, whereas 22.5% did not. Baseline use of CCPB was associated with an adjusted 19% lower mortality rate among CCPB users compared with nonusers. With successful matching of 800 exposed and nonexposed individuals on their exposure propensity score, however, CCPB users and nonusers had similar mortality. No mortality differences were observed between calcium acetate and calcium carbonate users in crude, adjusted, or propensity-matched analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found between CCPB use and 1-year mortality in incident dialysis patients; choice of calcium carbonate versus acetate was also not associated with this outcome. Randomized trials are necessary to understand whether the prevailing practice of phosphate-binding therapy actually reduces adverse clinical outcomes.

Benefits and harms of phosphate binders in CKD: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Phosphate binders are widely used to control serum phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We analyzed the effects of phosphate binders on biochemical and patient-level end points in patients with CKD.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE (1966 to April 2009), EMBASE (1980 to April 2009), and the Cochrane Renal Group Specialised Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL).

SETTING & POPULATION

Patients with CKD.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

Randomized controlled trials.

INTERVENTION

Phosphate binders.

OUTCOMES

Serum phosphorus, calcium, and parathyroid hormone levels; incidence of hypercalcemia; all-cause mortality; adverse effects.

RESULTS

40 trials (6,406 patients) were included. There was no significant decrease in all-cause mortality (10 randomized controlled trials; 3,079 patients; relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 1.16), hospitalization, or end-of-treatment serum calcium-phosphorus product levels with sevelamer compared with calcium-based agents. There was a significant decrease in end-of-treatment phosphorus and parathyroid hormone levels with calcium salts compared with sevelamer and a significant decrease in risk of hypercalcemia (RR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.62) with sevelamer compared with calcium-based agents. There was a significant increase in risk of gastrointestinal adverse events with sevelamer in comparison to calcium salts (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.87). Compared with calcium-based agents, lanthanum significantly decreased end-of-treatment serum calcium and calcium-phosphorus product levels, but with similar end-of-treatment phosphorus levels. Effects of calcium acetate on biochemical end points were similar to those of calcium carbonate. Existing data are insufficient to conclude for a differential impact of any phosphate binder on cardiovascular mortality or other patient-level outcome.

LIMITATIONS

Few long-term studies of the efficacy of phosphate binders on mortality and musculoskeletal morbidity, significant heterogeneity for many surrogate outcomes, and suboptimal reporting of study methods to determine trial quality.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there are insufficient data to establish the comparative superiority of non-calcium-binding agents over calcium-containing phosphate binders for such important patient-level outcomes as all-cause mortality and cardiovascular end points. Additional trials are still required to examine the differential effects of phosphate-binding agents on these end points and the mineral homeostasis pathway.

A blueprint for randomized trials targeting phosphorus metabolism in chronic kidney disease

The diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD) confers dismal clinical outcomes regardless of whether patients are initiating dialysis and face a median survival of only 2-3 years or they have earlier-stage CKD and face a risk of death that is greater than the risk of progression to dialysis. These poor outcomes are driven by extraordinarily high rates of cardiovascular disease that historically have not responded to risk-factor modification strategies proven to attenuate risk in the general population. Nor have measures aimed at increasing the dose or quality of dialysis made an appreciable dent in mortality. Still worse, interventions that were expected to be beneficial resulted in increased mortality in recent trials. Although this apparent lack of progress in advancing the care of CKD is discouraging, resignation is not an option. On the contrary, with the rising rates of CKD worldwide, there is an urgent need to rigorously test novel therapeutic strategies in randomized trials. The breadth of accumulating evidence linking disordered phosphorus metabolism to adverse outcomes spans in vitro, animal, and human studies, and positions phosphorus management as an attractive target for intervention. Although opinion-based practice guidelines promote phosphorus management strategies that are widely accepted in dialysis patients, there is a clear need to perform randomized controlled trials to prove or disprove the benefits of therapy. Perhaps even more important, the discovery of fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and its potential as a novel diagnostic to identify disordered phosphorus metabolism at an early, subclinical state has presented the opportunity to develop placebo-controlled randomized trials in pre-dialysis CKD patients with normal serum phosphate levels. This commentary considers the justification and challenges for such trials and presents a 'first-draft' blueprint of distinct trial approaches to initiate a dialog that will ultimately culminate in studies aimed at improving survival across the spectrum of CKD.

Caring for chronic kidney disease patients: focus on mineral and bone disorders

This case study focuses on a patient with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with mineral and bone disorders (MBD) and the relationship and management strategies used in treating CKD-MBD. The various risks and issues pertaining to the CKD stage 5 patient population are addressed, including CKD-MBD and renal osteodystrophy. Proper management of CKD-MBD with diet, dialysis, laboratory testing, and medications is discussed. An interdisciplinary team that includes the patient and family is crucial for effective management of MBD.

Phosphorus binders and survival on hemodialysis

Although hyperphosphatemia is a risk factor for mortality, there are limited data on whether therapy with phosphorus binders affects survival. We analyzed a prospective cohort study of 10,044 incident hemodialysis patients using Cox proportional hazards analyses to compare 1-yr all-cause mortality among patients who were or were not treated with phosphorus binders. We performed intention-to-treat analyses to compare patients who began treatment with phosphorus binders during the first 90 d after initiating hemodialysis (n = 3555) with those who remained untreated during that period (n = 5055). We also performed as-treated analyses that modeled phosphorus binder treatment as a time-dependent exposure. We compared survival in a subcohort of treated (n = 3186) and untreated (n = 3186) patients matched by their baseline serum phosphate levels and propensity score of receiving phosphorus binders during the first 90 d. One-year mortality was 191 deaths/1000 patient-years at risk. Treatment with phosphorus binders was independently associated with decreased mortality compared with no treatment in the intention-to-treat, as-treated, and matched analyses. The results were independent of baseline and follow-up serum phosphate levels and persisted in analyses that excluded deaths during the first 90 d of hemodialysis. In summary, treatment with phosphorus binders is independently associated with improved survival among incident hemodialysis patients. Although confirmatory studies are needed in the dialysis setting, future placebo-controlled, randomized trials of phosphorus binders might focus on predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum phosphate levels.

Switching to lanthanum carbonate monotherapy provides effective phosphate control with a low tablet burden

BACKGROUND

Despite recognized risks associated with hyperphosphataemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 on dialysis, the achievement of target levels of serum phosphate is poor. It is likely that this is partly due to poor adherence by patients to their phosphate-binder treatment regimens, which often comprise large daily tablet burdens.

METHODS

In this multicentre, open-label trial, patients on a stable dialysis regimen were screened while receiving phosphate-binder therapy, then entered into a washout phase. Patients with serum phosphate > 1.78 mmol/L after washout entered into the main 12-week treatment phase (N = 367), during which they were treated to target [Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI)]: 1.13-1.78 mmol/L; 3.5-5.5 mg/dL) with lanthanum carbonate monotherapy. Efficacy variables included serum phosphate levels and the percentage of patients with serum phosphate control. Safety and tolerability assessments were also conducted.

RESULTS

Mean serum phosphate levels were significantly reduced following 12 weeks of lanthanum carbonate monotherapy versus previous phosphate-binder therapy. The mean number of phosphate-binder tablets being taken per day at screening was 7.6, but during treatment with lanthanum carbonate, most patients were taking doses of up to 3000 mg/day, achievable with 3 x 1000 mg tablets per day (maximum of 6).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that lanthanum carbonate monotherapy offers effective control of serum phosphate and, due to a low tablet burden, may help to simplify the management of hyperphosphataemia in patients with CKD Stage 5.

New strategies for the treatment of hyperparathyroidism incorporating calcimimetics

BACKGROUND

Hyperparathyroidism (HPT), characterised by increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion and parathyroid hyperplasia, can be caused by physiologic defects in the parathyroid gland (primary HPT [PHPT]) or as a consequence of declining renal function (secondary HPT [SHPT]).

OBJECTIVE

To review the safety and efficacy of cinacalcet in the treatment of SHPT and PHPT.

METHODS

Studies indexed in NLM/PubMed investigating the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of cinacalcet for PHPT and SHPT and supporting preclinical evidence.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Recent evidence has demonstrated the efficacy of the calcimimetic cinacalcet in the treatment of PHPT and SHPT. Compared with traditional therapies such as vitamin D sterols and phosphate binders, cinacalcet treatment can allow an increased proportion of patients with SHPT to improve Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) Bone Metabolism and Disease laboratory parameter target attainment. Recent evidence suggests that improvements in these biochemical parameters with cinacalcet can translate into improved morbidity and mortality. Cinacalcet lowers PTH and calcium in patients following renal transplantation, and also normalises serum calcium in patients with PHPT. Ongoing studies are focusing and future studies are likely to focus on the effect of cinacalcet on clinical outcomes and on novel strategies for the integration of cinacalcet with traditional therapies to improve serum PTH and mineral metabolism control.

Aluminium speciation in biology

Before we can understand the role of Al3+ in living organisms we need to learn how it interacts with molecules found in biological systems. The only aluminium oxidation state in biology is 3+. In aqueous solutions there are only two main Al(III) species: the hexahydrate Al3+ at pH < 5.5 and the tetrahedral aluminate at pH > 6.2. In the blood plasma, citrate is the main small molecule carrier and transferrin the main protein carrier of Al3+. In fluids where the concentrations of these two ligands are low, nucleoside di- and triphosphates become Al3+ binders. Under these conditions Al3+ easily displaces Mg2+ from nucleotides. When all three classes of ligands are at low concentrations, catecholamines become likely Al3+ binders. Double-helical DNA binds Al3+ weakly and under no conditions should it compete with other ligands. Al(III) in the cell nucleus probably binds to nucleotides or phosphorylated proteins. Al3+ undergoes ligand exchange much more slowly than most metal ions: 10(5) times slower than Mg2+.

Emerging drugs for hyperphosphatemia

Cardiovascular mortality is the leading cause of death in the uremic patient. Hyperphosphatemia is considered an independent risk factor associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. As phosphate control is not efficient with diet or dialysis, phosphate binders are commonly prescribed in patients with chronic renal failure. Aluminum salts, the first phosphate binders, even if effective, have several side effects due to their deposition in CNS, bone and hematopoietic cells. Calcium-containing phosphate binders, used in the last 15 years, increase total body calcium load and may exacerbate metastatic calcification, thus, increasing the risk of cardiovascular mortality. Recently two new compounds non-aluminum and non-calcium phosphate binders, sevelamer hydrochloride and lanthanum carbonate, have been introduced. Sevelamer, besides the effect on phosphate, has been associated with reduction of coronary and aortic calcification and with other pleiotropic effects especially on lipid metabolism. Lanthanum carbonate has similar phosphate control to calcium-based binders with less incidence of hypercalcemia but long-term clinical studies are needed for testing long-term exposure. Recently the authors found in dialysis patients, that salivary phosphorus correlated with serum phosphorus. Therefore, they supposed that the use of salivary phosphate binders could reduce its absorption and represent a chance for reducing the serum phosphate concentration in uremic patients.

PHOSPHORUS METABOLISM AND MANAGEMENT IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: Phosphate Metabolism in the Setting of Chronic Kidney Disease: Significance and Recommendations for Treatment

Phosphorus is an essential mineral that plays a crucial role in cell structure and metabolism. In living organisms, phosphorus exists surrounded by four oxygen atoms to form phosphate (PO(4)). Within cells, PO(4) regulates enzymatic activity and serves as an essential component of nucleic acids, adenosine triphosphate, and phospholipid membranes. Outside cells, PO(4) primarily resides in bone and teeth as hydroxyapatite. A small amount of inorganic PO(4) circulates in serum, with levels balanced by gastrointestinal intake, renal excretion, and a set of specific hormones. Under normal conditions, PO(4) is excreted through the kidneys. Among patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving chronic dialysis, circulating PO(4) levels typically rise to levels well above the normal laboratory range. Higher serum PO(4) levels are strongly associated with arterial calcification and mortality in this setting. Among predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), phosphaturic hormones enhance renal PO(4) excretion to maintain serum PO(4) levels within the high-normal laboratory range. Recently, high-normal serum PO(4) levels have been associated with cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality among individuals who have CKD and among those who have normal kidney function. This review discusses PO(4) metabolism in the context of CKD, examines associations of PO(4) levels with adverse outcomes in the CKD setting, and suggests treatment strategies for moderating serum PO(4) levels.

Management of chronic kidney disease mineral-bone disorder

Chronic kidney disease mineral-bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is a systemic disorder of abnormal serum levels of mineral-related biochemistries, abnormal bone, and extraskeletal calcification. Although we have gained understanding on how these components are interrelated, our therapeutic tools remain focused on only one aspect of CKD-MBD at a time. However, the management of these disorders is also interrelated; treatments may help one aspect of the disorder but cause or accelerate another. As such, management remains a major challenge to nephrologists and requires balancing risk and benefit of the various available therapies. Our challenge for the decade ahead is to determine which combinations of therapy can be used safely together to prevent morbidity and mortality in CKD. Furthermore, the pathophysiology that sets these events into motion begins well before the onset of ESRD. Future therapies and guidelines should, therefore, also emphasize the need for earlier detection and management of CKD, shaped by the results of valid clinical trials.

Emerging strategies for lowering serum phosphorous in patients with end-stage renal disease

Hyperphosphataemia is a major problem in patients with chronic kidney disease as it has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Over the last four decades, different modalities have been applied to treat hyperphosphataemia with varying degrees of success. Unfortunately, treatment strategies have led to unforeseen complications. These have prompted the development of new classes of medications with potentially better efficacy and few short-term and long-term side effects. This article reviews the causes, mechanism and management of hyperphosphataemia.

The safety of phosphate binders

Disturbances of mineral metabolism occur during the early stages of chronic kidney disease. As renal function worsens, excess dietary phosphorus accumulates and blood levels increase, that can be clearly seen when the glomerular filtration rate has fallen below 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. In patients with end stage renal disease, standard dialysis (three times/week) falls far short of removing adequate amounts of absorbed phosphorus; therefore, hyperphosphataemia is found in the majority of these patients. Hyperphosphataemia has long been associated with progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy, it can also lead to soft-tissue and vascular calcification. Recent observational data have associated hyperphosphataemia with increased cardiovascular mortality among dialysis patients. Adequate control of serum phosphorus remains a cornerstone in the clinical management and, despite the growing amount of available therapeutic options, achievement of NFK/KDOQI targets for mineral metabolism remain poor. Several reasons may explain the failure to adequately treat hyperphosphataemia: poor compliance with diet and phosphate binder prescriptions are common causes. Also, factors related with cost, tolerance, palatability, safety and efficacy are important. In this article, the authors review the advantages and drawbacks of conventional and emerging therapies in phosphorous binding.

Control of Hyperphosphatemia among Patients with ESRD

Derangements of mineral metabolism occur during the early stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hyperphosphatemia develops in the majority of patients with ESRD and has long been associated with progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy. More recent observational data have associated hyperphosphatemia with increased cardiovascular mortality among dialysis patients. Adequate control of serum phosphorus remains a cornerstone in the clinical management of patients with CKD not only to attenuate the progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism but also possibly to reduce the risk for vascular calcification and cardiovascular mortality. These measures include dietary phosphorus restriction, dialysis, and oral phosphate binders. Dietary restriction is limited in advanced stages of CKD. Phosphate binders are necessary to limit dietary absorption of phosphorus. Aluminum hydroxide is an efficient binder; however, its use has been nearly eliminated because of concerns of toxicity. Calcium salts are inexpensive and have been used effectively worldwide as an alternative to aluminum. Concerns of calcium overload have led to the investigation of alternatives. Currently, only two Food and Drug Administration-approved noncalcium, nonaluminum binders are available. Sevelamer hydrochloride is an exchange resin and was not as effective as calcium acetate in meeting new guideline recommendations in one double-blind clinical trial. Lanthanum carbonate is a rare earth element and has been studied less extensively. Concerns of long-term administration and toxicity exist. Furthermore, these agents are significantly more expensive than calcium salts, which may contribute to patient noncompliance.

Combination therapy with sevelamer hydrochloride and calcium carbonate in Japanese patients with long-term hemodialysis: alternative approach for optimal mineral management

Calcium (Ca) overload by Ca-containing phosphorus (P) binder has been suggested to be implicated in the pathogenesis of soft tissue and vascular calcification, which contribute to increased morbidity and mortality of cardiovascular disease in patients undergoing dialysis. Recently, a noncalcium P binder, sevelamer hydrochloride (sevelamer), has become available in Japan. However, Japanese patients undergoing dialysis might be less tolerant of sevelamer treatment, and it is likely to cause hypocalcemia because their dietary Ca intake is less than that in European and American patients. We evaluated the effects of combination therapy with sevelamer and calcium carbonate (CC) on mineral metabolism in Japanese hemodialysis patients, as an alternative form of P management. A total of 210 hemodialysis patients were enrolled, and were given a small dose of sevelamer (0.75-1.5 g/day) on CC treatment. Sevelamer dose was gradually increased, while CC decreased during 24 weeks. Five patients discontinued sevelamer treatment because of severe constipation, anorexia, and parathyroidectomy for severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. After 24 weeks, the dose of sevelamer was significantly increased to 3.29 g/day (initial dose: 1.47 g/day), while CC was decreased by 54%. Adjusted serum Ca significantly decreased (9.63 +/- 0.57-9.45 +/- 0.67 mg/dL; P = 0.0012), although serum P increased (5.89 +/- 1.32-6.25 +/- 1.32 mg/dL; P = 0.017). Serum intact PTH (iPTH) significantly increased in patients with a low or normal iPTH level (< or =300 pg/mL), while it did not change in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (>300 pg/mL). The results suggest that the therapeutic regimen is more tolerant and reduces Ca load in Japanese hemodialysis patients while avoiding hypocalcemia. In addition, the mitigated Ca overload could improve PTH hyposecretion in patients with adynamic bone disease, which is associated with soft tissue calcification and higher mortality in uremia.

Calcium Loading, Calcium Accumulation, and Associated Cardiovascular Risks in Dialysis Patients

Calcium and phosphate imbalances are important mutable risk factors for cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nearly all dialysis patients require phosphate binders. These include traditional calcium-based compounds and, more recently, the calcium-free, metal-free, non-absorbed agent, sevelamer hydrochloride. Both binder types reduce serum phosphorus, but differ with respect to calcium load and metabolism. Absorption from calcium-based agents very likely promotes positive total calcium balance in many patients. Positive calcium balance is inappropriate in adults and may promote or accelerate soft-tissue and vascular calcification even in the absence of hypercalcemia. Calcium accumulation in heart and vascular tissues contributes to rapidly progressive cardiovascular calcification - a strong predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in stage 5 CKD. More than two-thirds of stage 5 CKD patients have calcification scores above the 75th percentile for matched controls -- scores associated with extremely high risk of cardiovascular events and death.

Phosphorus Management in End-Stage Renal Disease

Chronic kidney disease is an important public health problem, with an increasing number of patients worldwide. One important outcome of renal failure is disordered mineral metabolism, most notably involving calcium and phosphorus balance. Of importance is that increased serum phosphorus levels are associated with increased mortality rates. Despite dietary restrictions, patients receiving dialysis invariably experience hyperphosphatemia and require treatment with phosphate binders. Existing phosphate binders are effective in reducing serum phosphorus levels, but are associated with a number of important disadvantages. Lanthanum carbonate, a new noncalcium, nonaluminum phosphate binder, represents a promising treatment for hyperphosphatemia.

A comparison of clinically useful phosphorus binders for patients with chronic kidney failure

A comparison of clinically useful phosphorus binders for patients with chronic kidney failure. Over the past 30 years it has become apparent that hyperphosphatemia plays a major causative role across the entire spectrum of morbidity associated with advancing kidney dysfunction and failure. A large fraction (60% to 70%) of dietary phosphorus is absorbed and normally excreted by the kidneys. Ideally, as kidney function deteriorates, the net quantity of phosphorus absorbed from the GI tract should be proportionally reduced to match the decrease in kidney function. After initiation of chronic dialysis therapy, the absorbed phosphorus load should match the amount of phosphorus removed via dialysis plus any excreted by residual kidney function. Because it is very difficult to reduce dietary phosphorus to these levels, a variety of oral phosphorus binders have been employed. Currently available binders include alkaline aluminum, magnesium, and calcium salts (primarily calcium carbonate and calcium acetate), various iron salts, and the binding resin sevelamer hydrochloride. Lanthanum carbonate is the newest agent and will probably be released shortly. This review compares the theoretic and in vitro chemistry of these drugs with in vivo data obtained in both normal patients, and in patients with kidney failure. The clinical potency and potential toxicity of the binding agents are compared, and optimal drug administration strategies are also reviewed.

Treatment of hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients: The Calcium Acetate Renagel Evaluation (CARE Study)

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphatemia underlies development of hyperparathyroidism, osteodystrophy, extraosseous calcification, and is associated with increased mortality in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

To determine whether calcium acetate or sevelamer hydrochloride best achieves recently recommended treatment goals of phosphorus </=5.5 mg/dL and Ca x P product </=55 mg(2)/dL(2), we conducted an 8-week randomized, double-blind study in 100 hemodialysis patients.

RESULTS

Comparisons of time-averaged concentrations (weeks 1 to 8) demonstrated that calcium acetate recipients had lower serum phosphorus (1.08 mg/dL difference, P= 0.0006), higher serum calcium (0.63 mg/dL difference, P < 0.0001), and lower Ca x P (6.1 mg(2)/dL(2) difference, P= 0.022) than sevelamer recipients. At each week, calcium acetate recipients were 20% to 24% more likely to attain goal phosphorus [odds ratio (OR) 2.37, 95% CI 1.28-4.37, P= 0.0058], and 15% to 20% more likely to attain goal Ca x P (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.20-3.86, P= 0.0097). Transient hypercalcemia occurred in 8 of 48 (16.7%) calcium acetate recipients, all of whom received concomitant intravenous vitamin D. By regression analysis hypercalcemia was more likely with calcium acetate (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.8-13.3, P < 0.0001). Week 8 intact PTH levels were not significantly different. Serum bicarbonate levels were significantly lower with sevelamer hydrochloride treatment (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Calcium acetate controls serum phosphorus and calcium-phosphate product more effectively than sevelamer hydrochloride. Cost-benefit analysis indicates that in the absence of hypercalcemia, calcium acetate should remain the treatment of choice for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.

Management of Hyperphosphataemia in Dialysis Patients

Phosphorus control remains a relevant clinical problem in dialysis patients. With age, however, serum phosphorus level decreases significantly because of a spontaneous decrease in protein intake. Older patients usually need lower doses of phosphorus binders. Nevertheless, hyperphosphataemia is observed in a quarter of patients aged >65 years. Phosphorus retention is related to an imbalance between phosphorus intake and removal by dialysis, and is usually aggravated when vitamin D analogues are employed. Hyperphosphataemia induces secondary hyperparathyroidism and the development of osteitis fibrosa. Recent publications describe an association between phosphorus retention and increased calcium and phosphorus product (Ca2+ x P), with significant progression of tissue calcification and higher mortality risk. Dietary intervention, phosphorus removal during dialysis and phosphorus binders are current methods for the management of hyperphosphataemia. However, the phosphorus removed by standard haemodialysis is insufficient to achieve a neutral phosphorus balance when protein intake is >50 g/day. Additional protein restriction may impose the risk of a negative protein balance. More frequent dialysis may help to control resistant hyperphosphataemia. Phosphorus binders constitute the mainstay of serum phosphorus level control in end-stage renal disease patients. Aluminium-based phosphorus binders, associated with toxic effects, have largely been substituted by calcium-based phosphorus binders. However, widespread use of calcium-based phosphorus binders has evidenced the frequent appearance of hypercalcaemia and long-term progressive cardiovascular calcification. Sevelamer, a relatively new phosphorus binder, has proved efficacious in lowering serum phosphorus and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels without inducing hypercalcaemia. Furthermore, several investigators have reported that sevelamer may prevent progression of coronary calcification. However, its efficacy in severe cases of hyperphosphataemia remains to be confirmed in large series. There are no specific guidelines for phosphorus control in the elderly. Until more information is available, levels of mineral metabolites should be targeted in the same range as those recommended for the general population on dialysis (calcium 8.7-10.2 mg/dL, phosphorus 3.5-5.5 mg/dL and Ca2+ x P 50-55 mg2/dL2). PTH values over 120 ng/L help to avoid adynamic bone disease. Since elderly patients have a higher incidence of adynamic bone (which buffers less calcium) and vascular calcification, sevelamer should be the phosphorus binder of choice in this population; but sevelamer is costly and its long-term efficacy has not been definitively validated. Patients with low normal levels of calcium may receive calcium-based phosphorus binders with little risk. Patients with low values of PTH and high normal calcium should receive sevelamer. Tailored combinations of calcium-based phosphorus binders and sevelamer should be considered, and calcium dialysate concentration adjusted accordingly.

Safety of New Phosphate Binders for Chronic Renal Failure

Phosphate (Pi) retention is a common problem in patients with chronic kidney disease, particularly in those who have reached end-stage renal disease (ESRD). In addition to causing secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy, recent evidence suggests that, in ESRD patients, high serum phosphorus concentration and increased calcium and phosphorous (Ca x P) product are associated with vascular and cardiac calcifications and increased mortality. Dietary phosphorus restriction and Pi removal by dialysis are not sufficient to restore Pi homeostasis. Reduction of intestinal Pi absorption with the use of Pi binders is currently the primary treatment for Pi retention in patients with ESRD. The use of large doses of calcium-containing Pi binders along with calcitriol administration may contribute to over-suppression of parathyroid hormone secretion and adynamic bone disease as well as to a high incidence of vascular calcifications. When used in patients with impaired renal function, aluminium salts were found to accumulate in bone and other tissues, resulting in osteomalacia and encephalopathy.Sevelamer, an aluminium- and calcium-free Pi binder can reduce serum phosphorus concentration and is associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypercalcaemia, while maintaining the ability to suppress parathyroid hormone production. An additional benefit of sevelamer is its ability to lower low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and total cholesterol levels. Sevelamer attenuates the progression of vascular calcifications in haemodialysis patients, which may lead to lower mortality. The use of sevelamer in non-dialysed patients might aggravate metabolic acidosis, common in these patients. Several other calcium-free Pi binders are in development. Lanthanum carbonate has shown significant promise in clinical trials in ESRD patients. Magnesium salts do not offer a significant advantage over currently available Pi binders. Their use is restricted to patients receiving dialysis since excess magnesium must be removed by dialysis. Iron-based compounds have shown variable efficacy in short-term clinical trials in small numbers of haemodialysis patients. Mixed metal hydroxyl carbonate compounds have shown efficacy in animals but have not been studied in humans. Major safety issues include absorption of the metal component with possible tissue accumulation and toxicity.

Cardiovascular calcification in patients with end-stage renal disease: a century-old phenomenon

The mortality risk from cardiovascular disease is increased in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This is due to both traditional and dialysis-specific factors. Recently, a number of the dialysis-specific risk factors have been implicated in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular calcification. These include: hyperphosphatemia, high calcium-phosphate (Ca x P) product, elevated parathyroid hormone levels, duration of dialysis, and treatment with calcium-containing phosphate binders and vitamin D analogs. The recent availability of electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) has triggered increased awareness of the occurrence of cardiovascular calcification in ESRD patients. Given the development of transient hypercalcemia with calcium-containing binders, a link between calcium load from use of calcium-containing phosphate binders and development coronary calcification has been proposed. However, a causal relationship between use of these agents and cardiovascular calcification has not been established. Moreover, this phenomenon had been recognized over a century ago, long before these phosphate binders became available. Although its pathogenesis is likely to be multifactorial, available data strongly implicate elevated serum phosphorus as the primary culprit. Furthermore, the risk of calcification may be aggravated by vitamin D therapy, particularly in patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Therefore, achieving vigorous control of serum phosphorus, Ca x P product and parathyroid hormone level might decrease cardiovascular calcification and improve survival of patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Since calcium acetate is the most cost-effective phosphate binder available, we recommend that it should remain the first line treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with ESRD.

Update on vitamin D and its newer analogues: actions and rationale for treatment in chronic renal failure

Vitamin D is an important hormone for mineral homeostasis and the proper formation and maintenance of bone. In addition, vitamin D has broader functions in the body that expand its traditionally known role in mineral balance. In chronic renal failure, calcitriol deficiency contributes to the development and progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism, bone disorders, and altered mineral metabolism. Recent revelations of the broader role of vitamin D also suggest calcitriol deficiency may contribute to decreased cardiac and immune function in chronic renal failure patients. Research on vitamin D has led to a more complete understanding of the actions of vitamin D at the transcriptional level and with respect to the clinical use of vitamin D and its analogs to control parathyroid hormone overactivity and to replace the other D hormone-dependent actions in patients with renal failure. Limitations of vitamin D and its metabolites include hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia and suppression of bone turnover with the risk of adynamic bone disease. Vitamin D analogs may offer greater selectivity and potentially greater safety as compared to calcitriol because of their altered relative potency on calcium and phosphorus metabolism. This review focuses on the current understanding of the biological actions of vitamin D and its analogs and the rationale for treating patients with chronic renal failure.