Drug hypersensitivity causing granulomatous interstitial nephritis

Macrolide Allergic Reactions

Macrolides are antimicrobial agents that can be used to treat a variety of infections. Allergic reactions to macrolides occur infrequently but can include minor to severe cutaneous reactions as well as systemic life-threatening reactions such as anaphylaxis. Most reports of allergic reactions occurred in patients without prior exposure to a macrolide. Cross-reactivity among macrolides may occur due to the similarities in their chemical structures; however, some published literature indicates that some patients can tolerate a different macrolide. Most published reports detailed an allergic reaction to erythromycin. Desensitization protocols to clarithromycin and azithromycin have been described in the literature. The purpose of this article is to summarize macrolide-associated allergic reactions reported in published literature. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify publications linking macrolides to hypersensitivity reactions.

Granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis secondary to omeprazole

Drug-induced interstitial nephritis is a common cause of acute kidney injury indicated by elevated serum creatinine. We report a case of omeprazole-induced acute granulomatous interstitial nephritis (GIN). Our patient developed acute GIN secondary to omeprazole ingestion requiring haemodialysis. Treatment with steroids and withdrawal of omperazole was successful allowing the patient to discontinue haemodialysis in 3 months. She remains dialysis free with chronic kidney disease stage IV, reflected by a serum creatine of 191 μmol/L and estimated glomerular filtration rate of 23 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 5 years on follow-up.

Severe sialadenitis: A new complication of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

BACKGROUND

Drug cutaneous reaction and isolated cases of parotitis induced by terbinafine have been reported.

OBSERVATION

We report a case of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms induced by terbinafine associated with a severe sialadenitis and a complete sicca syndrome. Evolution was protracted with a slow recovery of the rash but sicca syndrome persisted with only a very mild improvement at 6 months.

CONCLUSION

Liver, kidneys, lungs, and heart are the organs the most frequently involved in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Salivary and lacrimal glands can also be severely involved in the course of drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.

Is it Crohn's disease? A severe systemic granulomatous reaction to sulfasalazine in patient with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Sulfasalazine is a widely used anti-inflammatory agent in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and several rheumatological disorders. Although as many as 20% of treated patients may experience reversible, dose-dependent side effects, less frequent but potentially severe, systemic reactions have also been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A severe systemic reaction to sulfasalazine developed in a 21-year old female with rheumatoid arthritis characterized by eosinophilia, granulomatous enteritis and myelotoxicity, cholestatic hepatitis, and seizures. The clinical course and management of this patient are presented as well as a review of the incidence and outcome of severe systemic reactions to sulfasalazine.

CONCLUSIONS

Granulomatous myelotoxicity and enteritis developed in a 21 year old female within 3 weeks of initiating sulfasalazine for rheumatoid arthritis. Following a short course of corticosteroids, the patient had resolution of her cholestatic hepatitis, rash, eosinophilia, and gastrointestinal symptoms with no residual manifestations at 7 months follow-up. Although severe reactions to sulfasalazine are rare and unpredictable, practicing physicians should be aware of unusual clinical presentations of toxicity when prescribing sulfasalazine.

Evaluation of clinical and histological prognostic markers in drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis

We analyzed the case records of 19 patients diagnosed to have drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis to assess the clinical profile and role of steroids in renal recovery, and to correlate histological features to outcome. Patients with underlying glomerular diseases, malignancy, obstructive nephropathy, or systemic infections were excluded. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone accounted for 6 cases (group A), whereas antibiotics were the major offender in the remaining patients (group B). In 13/19 (69%) cases, renal failure was severe enough to require dialytic support. Overall 14/19 (74%) of the patients recovered normal renal function within 6 weeks of withdrawal of the offending drugs. Neither the extent of renal recovery nor the time required for it was altered by oral steroids. Tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis adversely affected renal recovery. Oliguria, tubular necrosis, interstitial edema, and the density/distribution of interstitial infiltrate did not have any effect on the rate/extent of renal recovery.