Mortality risks of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis

Glycemic Control in Patients with Diabetes on Peritoneal Dialysis: From Glucose Sparing Approach to Glucose Monitoring

Optimized glycemic management is crucial for controlling atherosclerosis and consequent cardiovascular morbidity in patients with diabetes. Due to the continuous glucose burden from glucose-containing peritoneal dialysis (PD) solutions, PD patients with diabetes experience difficulties in glucose level regulation with glucose hypervariability and worsening dyslipidemia. Even in non-diabetic PD patients, glucose-containing PD solutions aggravate insulin resistance and cause overweight. Additionally, glucose degradation products (GDP) from glucose-based PD solutions provoke oxidative stress and complex inflammatory processes, leading to chronic deleterious and fibrotic peritoneal membrane changes. In this narrative review, we searched the literature using PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar over the last three decades to summarize the most important facts relevant to the presented issues, aiming to inform both endocrinologists and nephrologists in providing the best currently available care for people with diabetes on PD. We not only focus on adequate tailoring of insulin therapy adapted at the time of PD exchange with hypertonic glucose solution., but also emphasize the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) that allows assessment of mean glucose values and time spent in normal, hypo, and hyperglycemia. However, the routine use of CGM in PD patients is limited due to high cost, and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis is still recommended as a basic clinical tool for the assessment of glycemic control. Possible choices of antidiabetic drugs were considered given the narrowed choice due to contraindications for metformin and sulfonylurea. The other important therapeutic approach in PD patients with diabetes is using glucose-sparing PD regimens based on icodextrin and amino acid PD solutions with the addition of just one or two bags of low glucose concentration PD solution daily. This glucose-sparing approach not only reduces the glucose load and improves glycoregulation with correction of the lipid profile but also maintains the viability of the peritoneal membrane by reducing the harmful effects of GDPs.

Peritoneal Dialysis Technique Survival: A Cohort Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Reasons for transfer from peritoneal dialysis (PD) to hemodialysis (HD) remain incompletely understood. Among incident and prevalent patients receiving PD, we evaluated the association of clinical factors, including prior treatment with HD, with PD technique survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Adults who initiated PD at a Dialysis Clinic, Inc (DCI) outpatient facility between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2019.

EXPOSURE

The primary exposure of interest was timing of PD start, categorized as PD-first, PD-early, or PD-late. Other covariates included demographics, clinical characteristics, and routine laboratory results.

OUTCOME

Modality switch from PD to HD sustained for more than 90 days.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Multivariable Fine-Gray models with competing risks and time-varying covariates, stratified at 9 months to account for lack of proportionality.

RESULTS

Among 5,224 patients who initiated PD at a DCI facility, 3,174 initiated dialysis with PD ("PD-first"), 942 transitioned from HD to PD within 90 days ("PD-early"), and 1,108 transitioned beyond 90 days ("PD-late"); 1,472 (28%) subsequently transferred from PD to HD. The PD-early and PD-late patients had a higher risk of transfer to HD as compared with PD-first patients (in the first 9 months: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.17-1.96] and 2.41 [95% CI, 1.94-3.00], respectively; and after 9 months: AHR, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.99-1.35] and AHR, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.24-1.65], respectively). More peritonitis episodes, fewer home visits, lower serum albumin levels, lower residual kidney function, and lower peritoneal clearance calculated with weekly Kt/V were additional risk factors for PD-to-HD transfer.

LIMITATIONS

Missing data on dialysis adequacy and residual kidney function, confounded by short PD technique survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Initiating dialysis with PD is associated with greater PD technique survival, though many of those who initiate PD-late in their dialysis course still experience substantial time on PD. Peritonitis, lower serum albumin, and lower Kt/V are risk factors for PD-to-HD transfer that may be amenable to intervention.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important kidney replacement modality with several potential advantages compared with in-center hemodialysis (HD). However, a substantial number of patients transfer to in-center HD early on, without having experienced the quality-of-life and other benefits that come with sustained maintenance of PD. Using retrospective data from a midsize national dialysis provider, we found that initiating dialysis with PD is associated with longer maintenance of PD, compared with initiating dialysis with HD and a later switch to PD. However, many of those who initiate PD-late in their dialysis course still experience substantial time on PD. Peritonitis, lower serum albumin, and lower small protein removal are other risk factors for PD-to-HD transfer that may be amenable to intervention.

Comparative analysis of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis on the risk of new onset diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular events and mortality in dialysis patients. The impact of different dialysis modalities on the risk of new onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) remains a subject of debate. Previous studies did not adequately account for critical confounding factors such as pre-dialysis glycemic status, medication use, and nutritional status, which may influence the association between dialysis modality and NODM risk.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1426 non-diabetic end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent either hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) at a single medical center. We used different statistical methods, adjusting for potential confounding factors, and accounted for competing risk of death.

RESULTS

Over 12 years, 331 patients (23 %) developed NODM. After adjusting for potential confounding factors and mortality, PD patients had a significantly higher risk of NODM compared to HD patients (adjusted HR 1.52, p = 0.001). A propensity-matched cohort sensitivity analysis yielded similar results. Among patients with prediabetes, those receiving PD had a 2.93 times higher risk of developing NODM than those receiving HD (p for interaction <0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed among euglycemic patients. NODM was also associated with a 1.78 times increased risk of major cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that PD treatment may increase the risk of NODM in ESRD patients, particularly among those with preexisting prediabetes. These findings highlight the importance of personalized treatment approaches, and nephrologists should consider prediabetes when choosing the dialysis modality for their patients.

What are the factors that determine treatment choices in patients with kidney failure: a retrospective cohort study using data linkage of routinely collected data in Wales

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors that determine treatment choices following pre-dialysis education.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using data linkage with univariate and multivariate analyses using linked data.

SETTING

Secondary care National Health Service Wales healthcare system.

PARTICIPANTS

All people in Wales over 18 years diagnosed with established kidney disease, who received pre-dialysis education between 1 January 2016 and 12 December 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patient choice of dialysis modality and any kidney replacement therapy started.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67 years; n=1207 (60%) were male, n=878 (53%) had ≥3 comorbidities, n=805 (66%) had mobility problems, n=700 (57%) had pain symptoms, n=641 (52%) had anxiety or were depressed, n=1052 (61.6%) lived less than 30 min from their treatment centre, n=619 (50%) were on a spectrum of frail to extremely vulnerable. n=424 (25%) chose home dialysis, n=552 (32%) chose hospital-based dialysis, n=109 (6%) chose transplantation, n=231 (14%) chose maximum conservative management and n=391 (23%) were 'undecided'. Main reasons for not choosing home dialysis were lack of motivation/low confidence in capacity to self-administer treatment, lack of home support and unsuitable housing. Patients who choose home dialysis were younger, had lower comorbidities, lower frailty and higher quality of life scores. Multivariate analysis found that age and frailty were predictors of choice, but we did not find any other demographic associations. Of patients who initially chose home dialysis, only n=150 (54%) started on home dialysis.

CONCLUSION

There is room for improvement in current pre-dialysis treatment pathways. Many patients remain undecided about dialysis choice, and others who may have chosen home dialysis are still likely to start on unit haemodialysis.

Outcomes of elderly peritoneal dialysis patients: 65-74 years old versus ≥ 75 years old

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical data of elderly patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and compare patient and technique survival rates between Group 1 (65-74 years old) and Group 2 (≥75 years old).

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 296 elderly patients (≥65 years old) on maintenance PD who were admitted to the Peritoneal Dialysis Center of the Second Hospital of Soochow University. The patients were categorized by outcome into ongoing PD, changed to hemodialysis, renal recovery dialysis stopped, or death groups. The patients were divided into Group 1 (65-74 years old) and Group 2 (≥75 years old). Patient survival and technique survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors associated with patient survival were analyzed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

There were 176 (59.5%) subjects in Group 1 and 120 (40.5%) subjects in Group 2. The primary causes of death were cardiovascular events, peritonitis, and other infections. The patient survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 91.2%, 68.0%, and 51.3% in Group 1 and 76.8%, 37.5%, and 17.6% in Group 2 (p < 0.001, HR 0.387, 95% CI 0.282-0.530). There was no statistically significant difference in the technique survival rate between the two groups (p = 0.54).

CONCLUSION

The elderly PD patients in this cohort mostly died from cardiovascular events, with a higher patient survival rate in Group 1 and similar technique survival in both groups. Older age, lower prealbumin, higher creatinine, not being on activated vitamin D, and high Charlson's comorbidity index (CCI) score were independent risk factors for death.

Characteristics and 1-year survival of incident patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis compared with hemodialysis:a large 11-year cohort study

PURPOSE

Few studies have evaluated patients' characteristics and survival by dialysis modality in Brazil. We evaluated changes in dialysis modality and its survival in the country.

METHODS

This is a retrospective database of a cohort with incident chronic dialysis patients from Brazil. Patients' characteristics and one-year multivariate survival risk were assessed considering dialysis modality from 2011 to 2016 and 2017 to 2021. Survival analysis was also performed on a reduced sample after adjustment using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Of the 8295 dialysis patients, 5.3% were on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 94.7% on hemodialysis (HD). PD patients had higher BMI, schooling and the prevalence of elective dialysis starting in the first period than those on HD. In the second period, PD patients were predominantly women, non-white, from the Southeast region, and funded by the public health system, having more frequent elective dialysis starting and predialysis nephrologist follow-ups than those on HD. There was no difference in mortality comparing PD and HD (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-2.42; and HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.63-2.16; first and second period, respectively). This non-significantly different survival between both dialysis methods was also found in the reduced matched sample. Higher age and non-elective dialysis initiation were associated with higher mortality. In the second period, the lack of predialysis nephrologist follow-up and living in the Southeast region increased the mortality risk.

CONCLUSION

Some sociodemographic factors have changed according to dialysis modality over the last decade in Brazil. The one-year survival of the two dialysis methods was comparable.

Patients with end-stage renal disease and diabetes had similar survival rates whether they received hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

The survival rate of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance dialysis, including hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD), is markedly lower than that observed in patients with ESRD without DM.

METHODS

We used propensity score matching to balance the clinical characteristics of patients from the HD and PD groups. We compared the survival rate between HD or PD, followed by Cox regression analyses accounting for age, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), body mass index (BMI), and serum albumin levels to examine the outcome influence of dialysis modalities.

RESULTS

During follow-up, there were 19 (18.1%) and 18 (17.1%) deaths among patients who underwent HD and PD, respectively (P = 0.856). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed no significant difference in overall survival between patients in the HD and PD groups. Cox regression analyses stratified based on age, CCI, BMI, and serum albumin demonstrated that the choice of HD over PD did not influence survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of age, CCI, BMI, and albumin level, patients with DM and ESRD had similar survival rates whether they received HD or PD in China. The choice of dialysis modality should be individualized according to patients' physical status and local practices for patients with DM and ESRD.

Effect of Dialysis Modalities on All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Taiwan Renal Registry Data System (TWRDS) 2005-2012 Study

Introduction: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients who need renal replacement therapy need to face a dialysis modality decision: the choice between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD). Although the global differences in HD/PD penetration are affected by health-care policies, these two modalities may exert different effects on survival in patients with ESKD. Although Taiwan did not implicate PD as first policy, we still need to compare patients’ outcomes using two modalities in a nation-wise database to determine future patients’ care and health policies. Methods: We used the nationwide Taiwan Renal Registry Data System (TWRDS) database from 2005 to 2012 and included 52,900 patients (48,371 on HD and 4529 on PD) to determine all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among ESKD patients. Results: Age-matched survival probability from all-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients on PD than in those on HD (p < 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratios of 3-year and 5-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in PD compared with HD. The presence of comorbid conditions including myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease (CAD), diabetes mellitus (DM), hypoalbuminemia, hyperferritinemia and hypophosphatemia was related with significantly higher all-cause and CV mortality in PD patients. No significant difference was noted among younger patients <45 years of age regardless of DM and/or comorbid conditions. Conclusion: Although PD did not have the survival advantage compared to HD in all dialysis populations, PD was related with superior survival in younger non-DM patients, regardless of the presence of comorbidities. Similarly, for younger ESKD patients without the risk of CV disease, both PD and HD would be suitable dialysis modalities.

Variation in Peritoneal Dialysis Time on Therapy by Country: Results from the Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Quantifying contemporary peritoneal dialysis time on therapy is important for patients and providers. We describe time on peritoneal dialysis in the context of outcomes of hemodialysis transfer, death, and kidney transplantation on the basis of the multinational, observational Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) from 2014 to 2017.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Among 218 randomly selected peritoneal dialysis facilities (7121 patients) in the PDOPPS from Australia/New Zealand, Canada, Japan, Thailand, the United Kingdom, and the United States, we calculated the cumulative incidence from peritoneal dialysis start to hemodialysis transfer, death, or kidney transplantation over 5 years and adjusted hazard ratios for patient and facility factors associated with death and hemodialysis transfer.

RESULTS

Median time on peritoneal dialysis ranged from 1.7 (interquartile range, 0.8-2.9; the United Kingdom) to 3.2 (interquartile range, 1.5-6.0; Japan) years and was longer with lower kidney transplantation rates (range: 32% [the United Kingdom] to 2% [Japan and Thailand] over 3 years). Adjusted hemodialysis transfer risk was lowest in Thailand, but death risk was higher in Thailand and the United States compared with most countries. Infection was the leading cause of hemodialysis transfer, with higher hemodialysis transfer risks seen in patients having psychiatric disorder history or elevated body mass index. The proportion of patients with total weekly Kt/V ≥1.7 at a facility was not associated with death or hemodialysis transfer.

CONCLUSIONS

Countries in the PDOPPS with higher rates of kidney transplantation tended to have shorter median times on peritoneal dialysis. Identification of infection as a leading cause of hemodialysis transfer and patient and facility factors associated with the risk of hemodialysis transfer can facilitate interventions to reduce these events.

PODCAST

This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2022_05_31_CJN16341221.mp3.

Multifaceted Intervention to Increase the Use of Home Dialysis: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Home dialysis therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are less expensive and provide similar outcomes to in-center hemodialysis, but they are underutilized in most health systems. Given this, we designed a multifaceted intervention to increase the use of home dialysis. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the effect of this intervention on home dialysis use in CKD clinics across Canada.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 55 CKD clinic clusters in nine provinces in Canada between October 2014 and November 2015. Participants included all adult patients who initiated dialysis in the year following the intervention. We evaluated the implementation of a four-component intervention, which included phone surveys from a knowledge translation broker, a 1-year center-specific audit/feedback on home dialysis use, delivery of an educational package (including tools aimed at both providers and patients), and an academic detailing visit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients using home dialysis at 180 days after dialysis initiation.

RESULTS

A total of 55 clinics were randomized (27 in the intervention and 28 in the control), with 5312 patients initiating dialysis in the 1-year follow-up period. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in the use of home dialysis at 180 days in the intervention and control clusters (absolute risk difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 10%). Using a difference-in-difference comparison, the use of home dialysis at 180 days was similar before and after implementation of the intervention (difference of 0% in intervention clinics; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 3%; difference of 0.8% in control clinics; 95% confidence interval, -1% to 3%; P=0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted intervention did not increase the use of home dialysis in adults initiating dialysis.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Patient and Provider Education on Use of Home Dialysis, NCT02202018.

Death and cardiovascular outcomes in end-stage renal failure patients on different modalities of dialysis

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients are high. We examined the incidence and predictors of death and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in ESRF patients on different modalities of dialysis.

METHOD

Data were obtained from a population-based database (National Registry Disease Offices) in Singapore. The study cohort comprised all adult patients initiated on dialysis between 2007 and 2012 who were closely followed for the development of death and AMI until September 2014. Cox regression methods were used to identify predictors of death and AMI.

RESULTS

Of 5,309 patients, 4,449 were on haemodialysis and 860 on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Mean age of the cohort was 61 (±13) years (44% women), of Chinese (67%), Malay (25%) and Indian (7%) ethnicities. By September 2014, the incidence of all-cause death was 34%; close to a third of the patients died from a cardiovascular cause. Age >60 years and the presence of ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and PD were identified as independent predictors of all-cause death. PD patients had lower odds of survival compared to patients on haemodialysis (hazard ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.35-1.70, P<0.0001). Predictors of AMI in this cohort were older age (>60 years) and the presence of ischaemic heart disease, diabetes, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and current/ex-smokers. There were no significant differences in the incidence of AMI between patients on PD and haemodialysis.

CONCLUSION

The short-term incidence of death and AMI remains high in Singapore. Future studies should investigate the benefits of a tighter control of cardiovascular risk factors among ESRF patients on dialysis.

Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes

Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings.

This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement.

Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis.

Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age).

Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of cancer. Patients on HD also experience high burdens of symptoms, poor quality of life and financial difficulties.

Careful monitoring of the outcomes of patients on HD is essential to develop effective strategies for risk reduction. Outcome measures are highly variable across regions, countries, centres and segments of the population. Establishing kidney registries that collect a variety of clinical and patient-reported outcomes using harmonized definitions is therefore crucial.

Evaluation of HD outcomes should include the impact on family and friends, and personal finances, and should examine inequities in disadvantaged populations, who comprise a large proportion of the HD population.

Survival analysis in the incident dialysis patients by different modalities

BACKGROUND

To analysis survival in onset uremic patients who initiating HD or PD dialysis in our dialysis center.

METHODS

Between Jan. 2015 and June. 2018, patients with onset uremia and initiating planned-start dialysis were retrospectively enrolled in this study and followed up to January, 2019. The relationships between the types of dialysis modality and patient prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 460 patients were included in the final analysis. Of which, 213 patient (46.30%) undergoing PD and 247 patients (53.70%) undergoing HD with arteriovenous fistula. The average follow-up time was 27.9 months. Eighty-seven (18.91%) patients died during the study period. The all-cause mortality was 127 per 1000 person-year. It was 102 per 1000 person-year in the HD group and 171 per 1000 person-year in the PD group (p < 0.01). However, dialysis modality was not an independent predictor for survival. During the first year after dialysis initiation, patient survival was comparable between the PD and HD groups (log-rank p = 0.14). As the dialysis age increased over 1 year, HD patients seemed to have a better survival as compared to that of PD patient (log-rank p < 0.05), especially those older than 65 years and without DN.

CONCLUSIONS

Though dialysis modality was not an independent factor for overall survival, HD therapy seemed to be more suitable for patients without DN.

Evidence-Based Decision Making 7: Health Economics in Clinical Research

The pressure for health-care systems to provide more resource-intensive health care and newer more costly therapies is significant, despite limited health-care budgets. As such, demonstration that a new therapy is effective is no longer sufficient to ensure that it is funded within publicly funded health-care systems. The impact of a therapy on health-care costs is also an important consideration for decision makers who must allocate scarce resources. The clinical benefits and costs of a new therapy can be estimated simultaneously using economic evaluation; the strengths and limitations of which are discussed herein. In addition, within this chapter, we discuss the important economic outcomes that can be collected within a clinical trial (alongside the clinical outcome data) enabling consideration of the impact of the therapy on overall resource use, thus enabling performance of an economic evaluation, if the therapy is shown to be effective.

Impact of dialysis modality on major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: a national population-based study

BACKGROUND

Only few studies with inconsistent results comparing the relative risk of cardiac mortality between peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD). Switches between renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities render objective assessment of survival benefits a greater challenge.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2015. We included 13 662 and 41 047 long-term dialysis patients in a propensity score matching study design and a time-varying study design, respectively, to compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between patients receiving PD and HD. We also included 109 256 dialysis patients to compare the all-cause mortality among different RRT modalities.

RESULTS

For MACE, the hazard ratio (HR) for PD patients compared to HD patients was 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.02] in the propensity score study design and 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.12) in the time-varying study design. For all-cause mortality, the HR for PD patients compared to HD patients was 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.13) in the propensity score study design and 1.13 (95% CI 1.09-1.17) in the time-varying study design. The HR for death was higher at a level of statistical significance for females (1.21, 95% CI 1.15-1.28), patients ≥65 years old (1.30, 95% CI 1.24-1.36) and diabetes mellitus (DM; 1.28, 95% CI 1.22-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

The HR for MACE is significantly higher among PD patients in time-varying design analysis. In addition, all-cause mortality was higher in PD patients compared to patients with HD, especially in those who were aged ≥65 years, female or DM.

Propensity score matched mortality comparisons of peritoneal and in-centre haemodialysis: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Accurate comparisons of haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) survival based on observational studies are difficult due to substantial residual confounding that arises from imbalances between treatments. Propensity score matching (PSM) comparisons confer additional advantages over conventional methods of adjustment by further reducing selection bias between treatments. We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared mortality between in-centre HD with PD using a PSM-based approach.

Methods

A sensitive search strategy identified all citations in the PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE databases from inception through November 2018. Pooled PD versus HD mortality hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis. A subsequent meta-regression explored factors to account for between-study variation.

Results

The systematic review yielded 214 citations with 17 cohort studies and 113 578 PSM incident dialysis patients. Cohort periods spanned the period 1993–2014. The pooled HR for PD versus HD was 1.06 (95% CI 0.99–1.14). There was considerable variation by country, however, mortality risks for PD versus HD remained virtually unchanged when stratified by geographical region with HRs of 1.04 (95% CI 0.94–1.15), 1.14 (95% CI 0.99–1.32) and 0.98 (0.87–1.10) for European, Asian and American cohorts, respectively. Subgroup meta-analyses revealed similar risks for patients with diabetes [HR 1.09 (95% CI 0.98–1.21)] and without diabetes [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.90–1.09)]. Heterogeneity was substantial (I² = 87%) and was largely accounted for by differences in cohort period, study type and country of origin. Together these factors explained a substantial degree of between-studies variance (R² = 90.6%).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that PD and in-centre HD carry equivalent survival benefits. Reported differences in survival between treatments largely reflect a combination of factors that are unrelated to clinical efficacy.

Impact of the implementation of an assisted peritoneal dialysis service on peritoneal dialysis initiation

BACKGROUND

There is limited information available on the impact that provision of an assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD) service has on the initiation of PD. The aim of this study was to assess this impact in a centre following initiation of assisted PD in 2011.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre study analysed 1576 patients incident to renal replacement therapies (RRTs) between January 2002 and 2017. Adjusted Cox regression with a time-varying explanatory variable and a Fine and Gray model were used to examine the effect of assisted PD use on the rates and cumulative incidence of PD initiation, accounting for the non-linear impact of RRT starting time and the competing risks (transplant and death).

RESULTS

Patients starting PD with assistance were older than those starting unassisted: median (interquartile range): 70.0 (61.5-78.3) versus 58.7 (43.8-69.2) years old, respectively. In the adjusted analysis assisted PD service availability was associated with an increased rate of PD initiation [cause-specific hazard ratio (cs-HR) 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.61]. During the study period, the rate of starting PD fell before flattening out. Transplantation and death rates increased over time but this did not affect the fall in PD initiation [for each year in the study cs-HR of starting PD 0.95 (0.93-0.98), sub-distribution HR 0.95 (0.94-0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS

In a single-centre study, introducing an assisted PD service significantly increased the rate of PD initiation, benefitting older patients most. This offsets a fall in PD usage over time, which was not explained by changes in transplantation or death.

Low serum parathyroid hormone is a risk factor for peritonitis episodes in incident peritoneal dialysis patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels have been reported to be associated with infectious mortality in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Peritonitis is the most common and fatal infectious complication, resulting in technique failure, hospital admission and mortality. Whether PTH is associated with peritonitis episodes remains unclear.

METHODS

We examined the association of PTH levels and peritonitis incidence in a 7-year cohort of 270 incident PD patients who were maintained on dialysis between January 2012 and December 2018 using Cox proportional hazard regression analyses. Patients were categorized into three groups by serum PTH levels as follows: low-PTH group, PTH < 150 pg/mL; middle-PTH group, PTH 150-300 pg/mL; high-PTH group, PTH > 300 pg/mL.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 29.5 (interquartile range 16-49) months, the incidence rate of peritonitis was 0.10 episodes per patient-year. Gram-positive organisms were the most common causative microorganisms (36.2%), and higher percentage of Gram-negative organisms was noted in patients with low PTH levels. Low PTH levels were associated with older age, higher eGFR, higher hemoglobin, calcium levels and lower phosphate, alkaline phosphatase levels. After multivariate adjustment, lower PTH levels were identified as an independent risk factor for peritonitis episodes [hazard ratio 1.643, 95% confidence interval 1.014-2.663, P = 0.044].

CONCLUSIONS

Low PTH levels are independently associated with peritonitis in incident PD patients.

The Impact of a Pre-Dialysis Educational Program on the Mode of Renal Replacement Therapy in a Saudi Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background

Self-care and peritoneal dialysis (PD) benefits have been underutilized in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The pre-dialysis education program (PDEP) has been generally introduced as an acceptable tool in increasing the rates of PD and has been reportedly recommended for ESRD patients as part of the introduced care. We aim to study the effect of PDEP on ESRD and whether they would prefer PD of center-based hemodialysis (HD).

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study that was done at King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, in the dialysis center. Data were collected on patients and included demographics, preference of renal replacement therapy modality, and other possible factors that may affect patient choices such as educational level, economic status, and age.

Results

A total of 213 ESRD patients that met our criteria were included, with a total of 75 patients receiving PDEP. Out of those who received the PDEP, 57.3% and 42.7% of patients decided to perform HD and PD, respectively. There was a significant impact of PDEP on reducing HD choice [OR (95% CI) = 0.11 (0.05-0.24); P-value < 0.001]. Infections did not occur in 50.5% of the included patients while 45.8%, 3.3%, and 0.5% had central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), other infections, and peritonitis, respectively. Most of the PD patients (81.8%) did not have an infection as compared to 42.3% of the HD patients. HD was also associated with increased admission days [OR (95% CI) = 1.27 (1.07-1.51); P-value = 0.007].

Conclusion

We found that PDEP positively impacted the rate of PD while PD was associated with favorable outcomes and lower infection rates, emphasizing the importance of an educational program.

Survival Analysis: Comparing Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in Taiwan

⋄ Objectives

Comparisons of survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) and on hemodialysis (HD) have been conducted in many Western countries, but publications on this subject in Asian populations are scarce. The present study estimated the survival and the relative mortality hazard for HD and PD patients in Taiwan.

⋄ Methods

Incident end-stage renal disease patients reported to the Taiwan Renal Registry during 1995 – 2002 were included in the study. Patients had to be 20 years of age or older and had to have survived for the first 90 days on dialysis. A total of 45 820 incident HD and 2809 incident PD patients formed the study population. Patients on PD were treated mainly with traditional glucose-based solutions. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was applied to identify the factors that predict survival by treatment modality. Subgroup analyses were conducted by stratifying patients according to sex, comorbidity, age, and diabetes status. Kaplan–Meier estimates were used to explore the survival of HD and PD patients. Adjustments were implemented using the CPH model.

⋄ Results

The overall 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year and 10-year survival rates for PD patients were 89.8%, 77.6%, 67.6%, 55.5%, and 35% respectively. The equivalent survival rates for HD patients were 87.5%, 76.6%, 68.1%, 54.3%, and 33.8%. The differences were not statistically significant ( p = 0.125). The CPH analysis stratified by diabetes status and age revealed that PD patients 55 years of age or younger and nondiabetic had a lower mortality ratio (MR) of 0.94. But the MR increased to 1.31 for nondiabetic patients older than 55. The MR for PD versus HD further increased to 1.72 for diabetic patients 55 years of age or younger, and to 1.99 for diabetic patients older than 55.

⋄ Conclusions

After adjusting for both demographic and clinical case-mix differences, PD and HD patients were observed to have similar long-term survival. Subgroup analyses revealed that, among diabetic patients and patients older than 55, those on HD experienced better survival than did those on PD.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: Single Center Experience from Korea

Of a large body of literature reporting clinical outcomes for patients maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD), most publications have focused on relatively short-term results. Few reports have focused on long-term survival in PD patients. Here, we present our experience with long-term patient outcomes and further analyses of the trends in demographics and clinical outcomes of 2301 end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients treated with continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) during a 25-year period (1981 – 2005) at our institute. Outcomes were analyzed for 1656 patients, excluding those younger than 15 years of age at initiation of CAPD, those having less than 3 months’ follow-up, or those who had been on hemodialysis or who received a kidney graft before starting CAPD.

In the study patients, technique survival at 5 and 10 years was 71.9% and 48.1% respectively. Patient survival was 69.8% and 51.8%. Mean age at the start of PD (50.4 ± 13.9 years vs. 44.2 ± 13.9 years, p < 0.01), ESRD incidence as a result of diabetic nephropathy (30.5% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.01), and incidence of cardiovascular comorbidities (26.6% vs. 20.5%, p < 0.01) were all significantly greater in patients who started PD during the second half of the study period (1993 – 2005) as compared with the first half (1981 – 1992). A multivariate analysis adjusting for these changes in demographics and comorbid conditions revealed that PD therapy starting in 1993 – 2005 was associated with a significant reduction in technique failure [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65; p < 0.01] and mortality (HR: 0.68; p < 0.01) as compared with the earlier period. However, in subgroup analyses, technique survival was not observed to be significantly improved in patients with diabetes.

In summary, technique and patient survival have significantly improved despite increases in patient age, cardiovascular comorbidity, and ESRD caused by diabetes. Although diabetes, older age, and cardiovascular comorbidities are not factors that are easily modifiable to improve PD outcomes, results at our institution are encouraging in an era of declining PD utilization.

30 Years of Peritoneal Dialysis Development: The past and the Future

A review is given of 30 years of development in peritoneal dialysis (PD). After a short description of the first 20 years, the main emphasis is put on the last 10 years. Subjects discussed are the increasing use of PD in high-risk populations, peritonitis and other catheter-related problems, adequacy of dialysis and nutrition, patient outcomes in comparison with hemodialysis, and peritoneal membrane changes with time on PD. Topics that have emerged during the last decade and the challenges for the next decennium are discussed. The great importance of quality assurance in fast-growing PD populations and of prevention of long-term membrane alterations are emphasized.

Peritoneal Dialysis Utilization and Outcome: What are we Facing?

Penetration of peritoneal dialysis (PD) varies tremendously across the world. It ranges from about 80% in Hong Kong and Mexico to just a few percentage points in the United States, Japan, and Germany. While PD is growing in China, India, and some Eastern European and South American countries, it is declining in many European and North American countries. In terms of outcomes, the survival of PD patients is generally comparable to that of hemodialysis (HD) patients and better than that of HD patients during the first few years on dialysis. According to the U.S. Renal Data System, survival of patients on PD has been improving faster than that of patients on HD. In terms of cost, PD is usually cheaper than HD. Hence, declining PD utilization is unjustified. Work is required to identify and overcome negative factors such as physician bias, unfair medical reimbursement systems, and poor patient education.

Peritoneal Dialysis in Patients with Diabetes: Are the Benefits Greater than the Disadvantages?

Diabetic nephropathy has been increasing in prevalence in recent years, and it is now the dominant cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide. Because diabetes is frequently associated with multiple complications, nephrologists must be alert to the selection of dialysis modality so as to reduce the accompanying risks. The present review addresses whether the benefits of peritoneal dialysis are greater than its disadvantages in diabetic patients. The answer is quite positive: for most diabetic patients, peritoneal dialysis offers multiple benefits.

Comparison of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis

PURPOSE

Cardiovascular disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. With the increasing prevalence of dialysis patients, there is a need to systematically identify the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted in reference to the MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. Database searches were conducted on Medline and Embase on 17 March 2020. Meta-analysis of proportions was used to summarize the overall prevalence of events. Pairwise comparisons were used to compare between hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, and meta-regression was applied to identify the factors influencing disease.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies were included in the review and prevalence of cardiovascular disease events including coronary artery disease, coronary artery complications, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, atrial fibrillation, and cardiovascular mortality were summarized. Atrial fibrillation (RR 1.287 CI 1.154-1.436, p < 0.001), congestive heart failure (RR 1.229 CI 1.074-1.407, p = 0.003), and peripheral arterial disease (RR 1.132 CI 1.021-1.255, p = 0.019) were more common in hemodialysis patients, but cardiovascular mortality was lower in hemodialysis relative to peritoneal dialysis patients. (RR 0.892 CI 0.828-0.960, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The authors have found fewer cardiovascular events but higher cardiovascular mortality in patients on PD as compared to those on HD. Future research is required to establish the causality between dialysis modality and the cardiovascular outcomes described.

Survival Among Incident Peritoneal Dialysis Versus Hemodialysis Patients Who Initiate With an Arteriovenous Fistula

Rationale & Objective

Comparisons of outcomes between in-center hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are confounded by selection bias because PD patients are typically younger and healthier and may have received longer predialysis care. We compared first-year survival between what we hypothesized were clinically equivalent groups; namely, patients who initiate maintenance HD using an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and those selecting PD as their initial modality.

Study Design

Observational, registry-based, retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

US Renal Data System data for 5 annual cohorts (2010-2014; n = 130,324) of incident HD with an AVF and incident PD patients.

Exposures and Predictors

Exposure was more than 1 day receiving PD or more than 1 day receiving HD with an AVF. Time at risk for both cohorts was determined for 12 consecutive 30-day segments, censoring for transplantation, loss to follow-up, or end of time. Predictors included patient-level characteristics obtained from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2728 Form and other data sources.

Outcomes

Patient survival.

Analytical Approach

Unadjusted and multivariable risk-adjusted HRs for death of HD versus PD patients, averaged over 2010 to 2014, were calculated.

Results

The HD cohort's average unadjusted mortality rate was consistently higher than for the PD cohort. The HR of HD versus PD was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.20-1.30) in the unadjusted model and 0.84 (95% CI, 0.80-0.87) in the adjusted model. However, multivariable risk-adjusted analyses showed the HR of HD versus PD for the first 90 days was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.98-1.14), decreasing to 0.74 (95% CI, 0.68-0.80) in the 270- to 360-day period.

Limitations

Residual confounding due to selection bias inherent in dialysis modality choice and the observational study design. Form 2728 provides baseline data at dialysis incidence alone, but not over time.

Conclusions

US patients receiving HD with an AVF appear to have a survival advantage over PD patients after 90 days of dialysis initiation after accounting for patient characteristics. These findings have implications in the choice of initial dialysis modality and vascular access for patients.

Peritoneal dialysis patient selection from a comorbidity perspective

Despite many medical and socioeconomic advantages, peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an underutilized dialysis modality that in most countries is used by only 5%-20% of dialysis patients, while the vast majority are treated with in-center hemodialysis. Several factors may explain this paradox, such as lack of experience and infrastructure for training and monitoring of PD patients, organizational issues, overcapacity of hemodialysis facilities, and lack of economic incentives for dialysis centers to use PD instead of HD. In addition, medical conditions that are perceived (rightly or wrongly) as contraindications to PD represent barriers for the use of PD because of their purported potential negative impact on clinical outcomes in patients starting PD. While there are few absolute contraindications to PD, high age, comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, polycystic kidney disease, heart failure, and previous history of abdominal surgery and renal allograft failure, may be seen (rightly or wrongly) as relative contraindications and thus barriers to initiation of PD. In this brief review, we discuss how the presence of these conditions may influence the strategy of selecting patients for PD, focusing on measures that can be taken to overcome potential problems.

Association between initial dialytic modalities and the risks of mortality, infection death, and cardiovascular events: A nationwide population-based cohort study

To date, few studies have been conducted to pairwise compare the prognosis of peritoneal dialysis (PD), unplanned PD, and unplanned hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed longitudinal data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database. We included 45,165 patients whose initial dialytic modality was PD or unplanned HD between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2013. We divided the patients into three groups according to their initial dialytic modalities. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and death from infection during 1-year follow up. The risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned PD group than in the planned PD group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28–1.60; HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32–1.80). Likewise, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were higher in the unplanned HD group (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48–1.82; HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.61–2.13). Furthermore, the risks of all-cause mortality and infection death were also higher in the unplanned HD group than in the unplanned PD group (HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.07–1.23; HR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09–1.32). In conclusion, our study demonstrates that patients whose initial modality was planned PD or unplanned PD may have better clinical outcomes than those whose initial modality was unplanned HD.

Changes in mortality hazard of the Korean long-term dialysis population: The dependencies of time and modality switch

BACKGROUND

Many studies have compared patient survival outcome between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD); however, time-varying risks of dialysis modality have been rarely investigated. This study aimed to investigate dialysis modality switch and its association with the survival outcome in the Korean population.

METHODS

Data from the Korean Society of Nephrology were used. A total of 21,840 incident dialysis patients who started dialysis in or after 2000 were analyzed. For the survival analysis, both proportional and non-proportional hazard assumptions were applied. For the modality switch, time-varying covariate Cox regression was applied.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up of 8 years, PD group showed increased adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 1.248 (95% CI 1.071-1.454, p = 0.004) for mortality. Interaction of PD status with female sex was significant with an HR of 1.080 (95% CI 1.000-1.165, p = 0.050). Dialysis modality switch was associated with increased HR of 1.094 (95% CI 1.015-1.180, p = 0.019), albeit switch from PD to HD did not show significant HR until 6 years. Interestingly, time-varying risk analysis showed a decreased HR of PD after 10 years in the non-switcher group, which was consistent in patients with high traditional risk factors (with diabetes, elderly).

CONCLUSIONS

PD was associated with increased HR of mortality in the first 8 years, then it was associated with decreased HR of mortality after 10 years. Dialysis modality switch was associated with increased mortality risk, but switch from PD to HD within 6 years did not show significant hazard of mortality.

Complications and outcomes of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease in China: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the complications and survival of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who received urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) or urgent-start haemodialysis (USHD), and to explore the value of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as the emergent dialysis method for elderly patients with ESRD.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary care hospitals in Shanghai, China.

PARTICIPANTS

Chinese patients (n=542) >65 years of age with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/m2 who received urgent-start dialysis between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, and with at least 3 months of treatment. Patients who converted to other dialysis methods, regardless of the initial dialysis method, were excluded, as well as those with comorbidities that could significantly affect their dialysis outcomes.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Dialysis-related complications and survival were compared. Patients were followed until death, stopped PD, transfer to other dialysis centres, loss to follow-up or 31 December 2016.

RESULTS

There were 309 patients in the USPD group and 233 in the USHD group. The rate of dialysis-related complications within 30 days after catheter implantation was significantly lower in the USPD group compared with the USHD group (4.5% vs 10.7%, p=0.031). The 6-month and 1, 2 and 3-year survival rates were 95.3%, 91.4%, 86.6% and 64.8% in the USPD group, and 92.2%, 85.7%, 70.2% and 57.8% in the USHD group, respectively (p=0.023). The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that USHD (HR=2.220, 95% CI 1.298 to 3.790; p=0.004), age (HR=1.025, 95% CI 1.013 to 1.043, p<0.001) and hypokalaemia (HR=0.678, 95% CI 0.487 to 0.970; p=0.032) were independently associated with death.

CONCLUSIONS

USPD was associated with slightly better survival compared with USHD. USPD was associated with fewer complications and better survival than USHD in elderly patients with ESRD.

Long-Term Capd Survival and Analysis of Mortality Risk Factors: 12-Year Experience of a Single Mexican Center

Objective

To evaluate patient and technique survival, and to analyze mortality risk factors in a large Mexican single-center continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) program.

Design

Cohort study.

Setting

Tertiary care, teaching hospital located in Mexico City.

Patients

All patients from our CAPD program (1985 – 1997) were retrospectively studied.

Interventions

Clinical and biochemical variables at the start of dialysis were recorded and considered in the analysis of risk factors.

Main Outcome Measures

End points were patient (alive, dead, or lost to follow-up) and technique status at the end of the study (December 1997).

Results

627 patients, 37% with diabetes mellitus (DM), were included. Median patient survival (± SE) was 5.1 ± 0.6 years. In the univariate analysis, the following variables were associated ( p < 0.05) with mortality: DM, old age, hypoalbuminemia, low serum creatinine, low serum phosphate, and lymphopenia. In the multivariate analysis, the only significant mortality risk factors were DM (RR 2.56, p < 0.0001), old age (RR 1.01, p = 0.01), hypoalbuminemia (RR 0.77, p = 0.04), and lymphopenia (RR 0.98, p = 0.05). Median technique survival was 4.0 ± 0.2 years. Peritonitis, hypoalbuminemia, lymphopenia, old age, and DM were all significantly associated ( p < 0.05) with technique failure in the univariate analysis, while in the multivariate analysis, only DM (RR 1.78, p = 0.001), peritonitis (RR 1.13, p = 0.004), lymphopenia (0.98, p = 0.04), and hypoalbuminemia (RR 0.80, p = 0.06) were technique failure predictors.

Conclusions

Patient survival in our setting is similar to that reported in other series. Diabetes mellitus, lymphopenia, and hypoalbuminemia were the strongest predictive factors for mortality and technique failure on CAPD. Our 12-year CAPD program is one of the largest single-centers reported in CAPD literature.

Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis in the Elderly: A Review

During the past few decades, the pattern of end-stage renal disease has changed significantly with the emerging predominance of elderly patients. Because this heterogeneous population is characterized by a physiological decline in function of all organs, the nephrologist must contemplate the special needs of individual patients when they develop end-stage renal disease. Before the initiation of dialysis, these patients must be given detailed information to help them select the particular mode that will maximize their quality of life. According to available data, peritoneal dialysis offers some advantages for elderly patients, such as hemodynamic stability, steady-state metabolic control, good control of hypertension, independence from hospital, and avoidance of repeated vascular access. Early referral promotes the establishment of peritoneal access and minimizes the consequences of uremia, subsequent morbidity, and frequent hospitalization. Elderly patients are compliant and highly motivated to cooperate with their treatment. They have no higher modality-related complications than younger patients and their quality of life is satisfactory. Although most have comorbid conditions that interfere with self-performance of dialysis, such as impaired vision and reduced physical and mental activity, they can perform peritoneal dialysis successfully if they have a high level of family support. Patients who do not have family support may have successful peritoneal dialysis if they have access to a network of medical and social support, that is, private home nurses, rehabilitation and chronic care dialysis units, or nursing homes.

Peritoneal Dialysis: Better than, Equal to, or Worse than Hemodialysis? Data Worth Knowing before Choosing a Dialysis Modality

Technological advances such as those that allow the delivery of an adequate dialysis dose to a larger percentage of patients, minimization of peritoneal membrane damage with more biocompatible solutions, and lower peritonitis rates will undoubtedly improve retention of patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD) for longer periods. Currently, only 15% of the world dialysis population is managed by PD. Peritoneal dialysis has many advantages over hemodialysis, and if end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are fully informed about them, the proportion of patients who would prefer this treatment would rise to 25% – 30%. An integrated approach to the treatment of ESRD could start with PD in a large percentage of patients, especially those who will receive a kidney transplant within 2 – 3 years. With the present epidemic of ESRD, this approach could lead to a significant saving, relieve the pressure on dialysis units, and allow a larger number of ESRD patients to be treated.

Peritoneal Transport Characteristics, Comorbid Diseases and Survival in CAPD Patients

Objective

To evaluate the influence of initial peritoneal transport rate, serum albumin concentration, and comorbid diseases on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patient survival.

Design

A prospective single-center study with a long-term follow-up.

Patients

A total of 213 consecutive CAPD patients, who underwent a peritoneal equilibration test (PET) at a mean of 7 days (range 3 – 30 days) after beginning CAPD, were included in this study. One hundred twenty patients were male, 116 patients had comorbid diseases, and mean age was 49.5 years (range 18 – 76 years).

Methods

A modified PET was performed using 4.25% glucose dialysis solution. Based on the dialysate-to-plasma creatinine concentration ratio at 4 hours’ dwell (D4/P4Cr, 0.62 ± 0.14), patients were divided into high (H), high-average (HA), low-average (LA), or low (L) transporters.

Results

Of 213 patients, 16.9% were classified as H transporters, 30.5% as HA, 36.6% as LA, and 16.0% as L transporters. The H transporter group had a higher proportion of men, higher proportion of patients with comorbid diseases, lower initial serum albumin concentration, lower D4/D0glucose, and lower drained volume. The initial D4/P4Cr correlated with initial serum albumin ( r = –0.35, p < 0.001). The patients with comorbid diseases had lower initial serum albumin and higher initial D4/P4Cr. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, 2-year patient survival of group H was significantly lower compared to the other groups combined (57.1% vs 79.5%, p = 0.009). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, age, comorbid diseases, initial serum albumin concentration, and initial D4/P4Cr were found to be independent risk factors for mortality. However, in the patients without comorbid diseases, patient survival was not different between group H and the other transport groups combined ( p > 0.05), and only age was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality.

Conclusion

These data suggest that a high peritoneal transport rate at initial PET is associated with high mortality, and that this is in part due to an increased prevalence of comorbid disease in H transporters. These H transporters with comorbid diseases represent a subset of patients with an especially poor prognosis. In patients without comorbid diseases, high transport status or low serum albumin concentration was not an independent risk factor for mortality.

The Effect of Technique Failure on Outcome in Black Patients on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Background

We previously reported that, while black patients have a better patient survival than white patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), they also have a significantly higher technique failure rate (39% vs 8%, p < 0.0001). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of technique failure/transfer to hemodialysis (HD) on patient survival in black PD patients.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 137 incident black patients entering our PD program from January 1987 to December 1997. During the course of follow-up, 82 (60%) patients remained on PD (PD group) while 55 (40%) patients were permanently transferred to HD (PD–HD group). The primary outcome measured was patient survival.

Results

Average age was 49 ± 15 years, 42% were male, and 40% had diabetes mellitus. At baseline, serum creatinine was 10.8 ± 5.4 mg/dL, serum albumin 3.4 ± 0.7 g/dL, body mass index 27.3 ± 6.5 kg/m2, peritoneal transport status was high in 18% and high-average in 61%, and residual glomerular filtration rate was 3.4 ± 3.5 mL/minute. There were no significant differences in clinical features, nutritional status, peritoneal transport, residual renal function, or dialysis adequacy at baseline between the PD group and PD–HD group. While a greater proportion of patients transferring to HD had cardiac disease (53% vs 32%, p < 0.05), there were no other significant differences in 15 comorbid conditions assessed at baseline. The primary reason for transfer was peritonitis (64%) and the overall peritonitis rate in the PD–HD group was significantly higher than in the PD group (2.21 vs 1.17 episodes/patient-year, p < 0.0001). Overall follow-up was 34 ± 25 months for PD group and 44 ± 26 months for PD–HD group ( p < 0.01), with a mean time on PD prior to transfer to HD of 22 ± 18 months. During the course of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the number of patients transplanted or deaths. Patient survival at 1, 2, and 5 years was 91%, 80%, and 57% for PD group and 96%, 92%, and 55% for PD–HD group [ p = not significant (NS)]. A risk-adjusted time-dependent Cox regression analysis resulted in an adjusted relative risk of death that was not significantly different for those who transferred from PD to HD versus those who remained on PD (relative risk 1.49; 95% confidence interval 0.77–2.89; p = NS).

Conclusions

In black patients on PD, transfer to HD is not associated with any significant difference in patient survival compared to patients remaining on PD. While a high rate of peritonitis predisposes to technique failure, we found no features at baseline predictive of patients at greatest risk to fail PD. Since technique failure does not portend a poorer prognosis, PD remains a viable option for black patients entering an end-stage renal disease program.

The Fate of Older Diabetic Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: Myths and Mysteries and Suggestions for Further Research

The outcome of older and especially of female diabetic patients appears to be worse on peritoneal dialysis (PD) than on hemodialysis (HD). This opinion is based mostly on data coming from the USA, whereas data from other regions seem to give a more balanced picture. The questions arise whether indeed outcome is worse in this patient group, and what might be the underlying reasons for this; further research to unravel this phenomenon is warranted. This review proposes several suggestions for further exploration. The observed differences in outcome might be attributable to differences in treatment practices and experience with PD versus HD. As cardiovascular mortality is a major killer in end-stage renal disease patients, differences in fluid homeostasis and how it is achieved are potential explanations. Fluid balance is potentially more difficult to obtain in PD patients, especially as in the past it was spuriously suggested that fluid restriction was less important in PD patients. PD and HD might also have different impacts on factors related to inflammation, insulin resistance, and hormone balance. The adipocytokine network is of special interest in this respect. It is also possible that bias introduced by the way we measure body composition might have a more negative impact on PD than on HD patients. Finally, it still is not fully established that if diabetic patients are treated appropriately, their outcome on PD is worse than that on HD; further observational trials in this respect are needed. All these topics require further clarification and investigation.

Impact of First Dialysis Modality on Outcome of Patients Contraindicated for Kidney Transplant

Background

We compared, in patients contraindicated for kidney transplant, outcomes between those patients who were only on hemodialysis (HD) and those who were given peritoneal dialysis (PD) as first renal replacement therapy (RRT).

Design

Prospective, population-based cohort study of incident cases of end-stage renal disease between June 1997 and June 1999.

Setting

A network of dialysis care: NEPHROLOR, that is, all the renal units in Lorraine, one of the 22 French administrative regions (population over 2.3 million people).

Participants

387 patients were contraindicated for kidney transplant during the first 2 years of RRT: 284 were on HD, 103 on PD. Mean age was 67.6 ± 11.3 years for HD patients and 70.8 ± 11.4 years for PD patients ( p = 0.015).

Main Outcome Measures

Mortality until June 2003, hospitalization over the 2 first years of RRT, and Kidney Disease and Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF) 6 and 12 months after initiation of RRT.

Results

HD patients were more likely to die from cardiac or cerebrovascular causes, PD from cachexia or withdrawal from dialysis. Whatever mode of RRT, the unadjusted 2-year and 5-year survival rates were similar ( p = 0.98). The rate of total duration of hospital stay per month of RRT was similar in HD and PD groups: 2.7 ± 4.5 and 2.9 ± 4.2 days respectively ( p = 0.7). PD was associated with better quality of life than HD. The dimensions Role limitation due to emotional function, Burden of kidney disease, and Role limitation due to physical function ranked first, second, and third for PD.

Conclusion

In Lorraine, end-stage renal disease patients who were given PD as first-line RRT had no excess of death risk or hospitalizations, and better quality of life the first year of RRT.

Negotiated Care Improves Fluid Status in Diabetic Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Background

Volume overload is common in diabetic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (PD), especially when the patient's residual renal function decreases with time on PD. Due to the higher dietary salt and fluid intake, diabetic PD patients tend to use more hyper-tonic glucose solution to remove excess fluid, which in turn may lead to increased membrane permeability. In the present study, we investigated the effect of negotiated care on fluid status in diabetic PD patients.

Methods

All diabetic PD patients who had been on PD for at least 3 months by the end of year 2002 in the First Hospital of Peking University were included in the present study. A primary nurse was assigned to each patient and intensive patient education was implemented, focusing on the importance of dietary salt and fluid restriction, the detrimental effect of using more hypertonic glucose solution, and the consequence of fluid overload. Decisions on dialysis prescriptions were made after extensive discussion among the primary nurse, nephrologists, patients, and patients’ families. A patient support group was also involved when it was necessary. All the patients were followed for 1 year and fluid status, compliance to dietary restriction, and dialysis prescription were evaluated before the start and at the end of the study.

Results

There were 30 diabetic PD patients (age 65.4 ± 10.3 years; on PD for 24.5 ± 19.9 months, range 3 – 66 months) included in the study when it was started. During the 1 year of follow-up, 4 patients died of diabetic complications, 3 patients were transferred to hemodialysis due to resistant peritonitis, and 2 patients were transplanted. By the end of follow-up, 21 patients remained on PD, among whom 15 had improved fluid status, 4 did not change, and 2 had worsened fluid status as assessed by clinical and bio-impedance evaluation. Patient compliance to dietary salt and fluid restriction had increased from 19.5% to 76.2%. During the follow-up, 8 patients were anuric at the beginning of the study and the remaining 22 patients had declining residual renal function. Only 4 patients increased their use of hypertonic solution including 2.5% (3 patients) and 4.25% (1 patient) glucose, whereas 5 patients decreased their use of 2.5% dialysis solution. By the end of follow-up, only 1 of the 21 patients was using 4.25% glucose solution and all the patients had good blood glucose control.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that negotiated care can be successfully used in diabetic PD patients. It helps to minimize the use of hypertonic glucose solution and improves patient compliance to dietary restriction of salt and fluid intake, and thus improves their fluid status.

A Comparison of Outcomes between Diabetic and Nondiabetic Capd Patients in India

Background

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) has been an established modality of renal replacement therapy in India for a decade, but there is a paucity of published data on the outcome of CAPD patients in India. We analyzed our data to determine the overall predictors of survival and compared patient survival between diabetic and nondiabetic end-stage renal disease patients on CAPD.

Methods

Of 373 patients, 197 were diabetic (165 males, 32 females) and 176 nondiabetic (104 males, 72 females). Patients were followed for 22 ± 14 patient-months. Patients were prospectively followed until the study end point or death.

Results

Overall median survival was 48 patient-months. Median survival of diabetics (34.5 patient-months) was significantly inferior to nondiabetic patients (59 patient-months) p = 0.001. Overall patient survival at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 90%, 72%, 60%, 49%, and 39%, respectively. Patient survival of diabetics versus nondiabetics at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years was 85% versus 96%, 62% vs 82%, 48% vs 72%, 39% vs 62%, and 34% vs 42%, respectively. The relative risk of mortality in nondiabetics (34/176) was less than that in diabetic patients (71/197): odds ratio (OR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 – 0.68; p = 0.001. On Cox regression analysis, diabetes (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.23 – 3.07; p = 0.004), comorbidities (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25 – 0.61; p = 0.001), peritonitis (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.19 – 2.68; p = 0.005), malnutrition (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29 – 0.94; p = 0.03), and residual glomerular filtration rate at initiation of CAPD (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81 – 0.93; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of overall mortality. Age (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.45 – 1.03; p = 0.07), gender (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.42 – 1.03; p = 0.06), and albumin level at initiation of CAPD (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.64 – 1.33; p = 0.68) were not predictors of mortality. Age (56 ± 10 vs 46 ± 15 years, p = 0.001), comorbidities (51/197 vs 16/176, p = 0.001), peritonitis rate (0.68 vs 0.50 episodes/patient-year, p = 0.056), and severe malnutrition (27/197 vs 10/176, p = 0.002) were higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients.

Conclusion

In India the majority of CAPD patients are diabetic. Patient survival was inferior in diabetic compared to nondiabetic patients on CAPD, but survival was statistically similar after adjustment for comorbidities. Diabetes, comorbidities, residual glomerular filtration rate, peritonitis, and severe malnutrition are predictors of mortality in CAPD patients.

Patient and Technique Survival and Factors Affecting Mortality on Peritoneal Dialysis in Turkey: 12 Years’ Experience in a Single Center

Background

We investigated patient and technique survival and factors affecting mortality in Turkish peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.

Patients and Methods

This was a retrospective study. 423 PD patients were included. The demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected from the medical records. Clinical outcomes were mortality and technique failure.

Results

Mean age at the start of PD was 46.0 ± 14.3 years and mean PD duration was 37.1 ± 28.3 (median: 30, range: 4 – 137) months. Diabetes mellitus was the most common cause of end-stage renal disease (35.2%), followed by hypertension (14.7%). There were 89 (21.0%) deaths. 25 (5.9%) patients received a kidney transplant, 74 (17.4%) patients were transferred to hemodialysis. Estimation of technique survival by Kaplan–Meier was 96.1%, 83.2%, 67.6%, 45.8%, and 33.6% at 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 years. Technique failure was associated with peritonitis rate [relative risk (RR): 3.22, p < 0.001] and peritoneal Kt/V urea (RR: 0.38, p = 0.001) in the Cox proportional hazards model analysis. Estimation of patient survival by Kaplan–Meier was 96.9%, 83.8%, 68.8%, 50.2%, and 40.7% at 1, 3, 5, 8, and 10 years, respectively. In the Cox proportional hazards model analysis, age (RR: 1.01, p = 0.05), transfer to PD from hemodialysis (RR: 1.84, p = 0.03), comorbid cardiovascular disease (RR: 1.90, p = 0.004), serum creatinine level (RR: 0.75, p < 0.001), total Kt/V urea (RR: 0.34, p < 0.001), peritonitis rate (RR: 1.87, p < 0.001), and dialysate-to-plasma creatinine ratio (RR: 6.49, p = 0.04) predicted mortality.

Conclusions

Even though we cannot conclude with certainty that survival rates in Turkish patients are better than those in the United States and Europe, our results seem to suggest this and warrant further studies adjusted for more extensive demographic features and comorbidities. The factors affecting mortality in Turkish PD patients are similar to other populations.

Peritoneal Dialysis in Ontario: A Natural Experiment in Physician Reimbursement Methodology

Background

The factors that determine dialysis modality selection and distribution are not well understood. Physician reimbursement incentives have been suggested to play an important role. Under the fee-for-service system in Ontario that existed prior to July 1998, nephrologists were paid about sevenfold more for a hemodialysis (HD) patient than for a patient on peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, since then, nephrologists have been reimbursed via a modality-independent capitation fee, whereby payment for any form of dialysis is the same. This was expected to markedly increase the use of PD.

Methods

When the capitation fee was introduced in 1998, a survey questionnaire of all Ontario nephrologists was done and repeated 3 years later (response rate 62.5%). Changes in dialysis modality incidence and prevalence rates in Ontario and in the rest of Canada were examined.

Results

On a scale of 1 to 7, nephrologists were convinced that the capitation fee was a good thing (mean rating 6.07); 75% said they had been seeing patients at every dialysis under the old system, compared to 41% now. Of significance, the proportion of prevalent patients on PD in Ontario declined from 27.3% in 1997 to 19.7% in 2000, increasing to 22.6% in 2002. Similarly, the incident PD rate seems to have stabilized, while the use of non-hospital-based HD has increased.

Conclusions

Following the introduction of the capitation fee, PD use in Ontario continued to decline for 2 years, and then began to increase. In the rest of Canada, there are continuing declines in PD use. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the new incentives caused by the altered physician reimbursement are acting in a subtle way to increase PD and non-hospital-based HD. A longer period of observation may be required to assess the complete effect.

The benefit of early survival on PD versus HD—Why this is (still) very important

There are a number of misconceptions around the identified early survival benefit of peritoneal dialysis (PD) relative to hemodialysis (HD), including that such benefits “even out in the end” since the relative risk of death over time eventually encompasses 1.0 (or even an estimate that is unfavorable to PD); that the early benefit is, in fact, most likely due to unmeasured confounding; and such benefits are only due to the influence of central venous catheters and “crash starters” in the HD group. In fact, the early survival benefit results in a substantial gain of patient life years in PD cohorts relative to HD ones, even if it the benefit appears to “even out in the end,” is relatively insensitive to unmeasured confounding, and persists even when the effects of central venous catheters are accounted for. In this review, the calculations and arguments are made to support these tenets. Survival on dialysis is still one of the most important considerations for all stakeholders in the end-stage kidney disease community, including patients who rank it among their top priorities. Shared decision-making is a fundamental patient right and requires both balanced information and an iterative mechanism for a consensual decision based on shared understanding and purpose. A cornerstone of this process should be an explicit discussion of the early survival benefit of PD relative to HD.

Survival advantage of planned haemodialysis over peritoneal dialysis: a cohort study

Background

Previous studies comparing the outcomes in haemodialysis (HD) with those in peritoneal dialysis (PD) have yielded conflicting results.

Methods

The aim of the study was to compare the survival of planned HD versus PD patients in a cohort of adult incident patients who started renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 2006 and 2008 in the nationwide REIN registry (Réseau Epidémiologie et Information en Néphrologie). Patients who started RRT in emergency or stopped RRT within 2 months were excluded. Adjusted Cox models, propensity score matching and marginal structural models (MSMs) were used to compensate for the lack of randomization and provide causal inference from longitudinal data with time-dependent treatments and confounders including transplant censorship, modality change over time and time-varying covariates.

Results

Among a total of 13 767 dialysis patients, 13% were on PD at initiation of RRT and 87% were on HD. The median survival times were 53.5 months or 4.45 years and 38.6 months or 3.21 years for patients starting on HD and PD, respectively. Regardless of the model used, there was a consistent advantage in terms of survival for HD patients: hazard ratio (HR) 0.76 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.69-0.84] with the Cox model using propensity score; HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.73) in the Cox model with censorship for each treatment change; and HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.69-0.97) with MSMs. However, MSMs tended to reduce the survival gap between PD and HD patients.

Conclusion

This large cohort study using various statistical methods to minimize the bias appears to demonstrate a better survival in planned HD than in PD.

Hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly-getting it right

Choosing the optimal hemodialysis vascular access for the elderly patient is best achieved by a patient-centered coordinated multidisciplinary team approach that aligns the patient's end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, i.e., the individual treatment approach (supportive care, time-limited or long-term kidney replacement therapy, or combination thereof) and selection of dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis) with the most suitable dialysis access. Finding the right balance between the patient's preferences, the likelihood of access function and survival, and potential complications in the context of available resources and limited patient survival can be extremely challenging. The framework for choosing the most appropriate vascular access for the elderly presented in this review considers the individual end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, the patient life expectancy, the likelihood of access function and survival, the timing of dialysis relative to access placement, prior access history, and patient preference. This complex decision-making process should be dynamic in order to accommodate patients' changing needs and life and health circumstances. Effective and timely communication between the patient, their caregivers, and treating team is key to delivering truly patient-centered care. Delivering this care also requires overcoming the limitations of the currently available evidence that is predominantly based on observational data with its inherent risks of bias. While challenging, future randomized controlled studies exploring the risks, benefits, costs, and timing of placement of available access types in the elderly are required to help us "get it right" for our patients.