Therapeutic effect of human fibroblast interferon on premalignant lesions arising in oral mucosa. A pilot study

Different Treatment Modalities of Oral Lichen Planus-A Narrative Review

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology which affects the oral mucosa. OLP varies in its clinical features from a reticular form that is, in most cases, asymptomatic, to atrophic-erosive, and is accompanied by symptoms of burning sensation and pain followed by difficulty in eating. Given the fact that OLP is a disease of unknown etiology, the treatment is symptomatic and involves suppressing the signs and symptoms of the disease using various topical and systemic drugs. The first line of therapy for treating symptomatic OLP is topical corticosteroids, whereas systemic corticosteroids are used for treating persistent lesions that do not respond to local treatment. However, the lack of convincing evidence on the efficacy of previous therapies, including topical corticosteroids, and numerous side effects that have appeared over recent years has resulted in the emergence and development of new therapeutic options. Some of the therapies mentioned are tacrolimus, efalizumab, dapson, interferon, retinoic acid, photochemotherapy with psoralen and ultraviolet A rays (PUVA), aloe vera, antimalarials, antibiotics and others. These therapies only partially meet the properties of efficacy and safety of use, thus justifying the continuous search and testing of new treatment methods.

Current controversies in oral lichen planus: report of an international consensus meeting. Part 2. Clinical management and malignant transformation

Despite recent advances in understanding the immunopathogenesis of oral lichen planus (LP), the initial triggers of lesion formation and the essential pathogenic pathways are unknown. It is therefore not surprising that the clinical management of oral LP poses considerable difficulties to the dermatologist and the oral physician. A consensus meeting was held in France in March 2003 to discuss the most controversial aspects of oral LP. Part 1 of the meeting report focused on (1) the relationship between oral LP and viral infection, with special emphasis on hepatitis C virus (HCV), and (2) oral LP pathogenesis, in particular the immune mechanisms resulting in lymphocyte infiltration and keratinocyte apoptosis. Part 2 focuses on patient management and therapeutic approaches and includes discussion on malignant transformation of oral LP.

Management of oral lichen planus

Lichen planus is a relatively common disorder of the stratified squamous epithelia. Most dental and medical practitioners see patients with lichen planus, but not all are recognized as having the disease. Patients with lichen planus may have concomitant involvement of the disease in multiple sites. Oral lichen planus lesions usually have a distinctive clinical morphology and characteristic distribution, but oral lichen planus may also present a confusing array of patterns and forms, and other disorders may clinically mimic oral lichen planus. The etiopathogenesis of lichen planus appears to be complex, with interactions between genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Much has now been clarified about the etiopathogenic mechanisms involved and interesting new associations, such as with liver disease, have emerged. The management of lichen planus is still not totally satisfactory in all cases and there is as yet no definitive treatment that results in long term remission, but there have been advances in the control of the condition. Amongst the many treatments available, high potency topical corticosteroids remain the most reliably effective, though topical cyclosporine, topical tacrolimus, or systemic corticosteroids may be indicated in patients whose condition is unresponsive to topical corticosteroids.

The management of oral lichen planus

OBJECTIVE

To review the current literature regarding the medical treatment of oral lichen planus (OLP).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed on-line Medline data searches were carried out for the years 1966-1998 to identify reports on therapy of OLP.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Single case reports or open trials were included if they covered new therapeutic approaches or suggested significant modifications of known treatment modalities. Review papers were limited to those dealing with the topic.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Every paper was critically examined. Because of the great heterogeneity of the response criteria, many data could not be directly compared. Stronger weight was given to therapies that have proven to be effective under placebo-controlled research protocols. Attention was also drawn to potential and effective adverse effects of every drug used.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the various medications advocated for the treatment of OLP, several lack conclusive findings from adequately controlled trials. Mainly high-potency topical corticosteroids in an adhesive medium appear at present the safest and most efficacious. Adjuvant agents as antimycotics may be useful in topical steroid treatment. Systemic corticosteroids may be occasionally indicated for severe recalcitrant erosive OLP or for diffuse mucocutaneous involvement. Topical cyclosporine should be considered in steroid-unresponsive cases considering that its efficacy in OLP could be related to a systemic effect and its high cost. Classical PUVA therapy seems to have too many side effects; topical application of psoralen is promising but still experimental. Topically and systemically delivered retinoids combined with topical corticosteroids could improve the efficacy of these agents whereas complete remission is difficult to achieve with retinoids alone and they frequently cause adverse effects. Finally, there are only few data concerning the long-term effect of the medical treatments upon the course of OLP and we do not know if therapy influences the malignant evolution of OLP.

Update on oral lichen planus: etiopathogenesis and management

Lichen planus (LP) is a relatively common disorder of the stratified squamous epithelia, which is, in many ways, an enigma. This paper is the consensus outcome of a workshop held in Switzerland in 1995, involving a selection of clinicians and scientists with an interest in the condition and its management. The oral (OLP) eruptions usually have a distinct clinical morphology and characteristic distribution, but OLP may also present a confusing array of patterns and forms, and other disorders may clinically simulate OLP. Lesions may affect other mucosae and/or skin. Lichen planus is probably of multifactorial origin, sometimes induced by drugs or dental materials, often idiopathic, and with an immunopathogenesis involving T-cells in particular. The etiopathogenesis appears to be complex, with interactions between and among genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors, but much has now been clarified about the mechanisms involved, and interesting new associations, such as with liver disease, have emerged. The management of lichen planus is still not totally satisfactory, and there is as yet no definitive treatment, but there have been advances in the control of the condition. There is no curative treatment available; immunomodulation, however, can control the condition. Based on the observed increased risk of malignant development, OLP patients should be offered regular follow-up examination from two to four times annually and asked to report any changes in their lesions and/or symptoms. Follow-up may be particularly important in patients with atrophic/ulcerative/erosive affections of the tongue, the gingiva, or the buccal mucosa. Much more research is required into the genetic and environmental aspects of lichen planus, into the premalignant potential, and into the possible associations with chronic liver, and other disorders. More clinical studies are required into the possible efficacy of immunomodulatory drugs such as pentoxifylline and thalidomide.

Immunoprevention of cancer poses a challenge to pharmacological research

The evolving understanding of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis establishes that the long latency period would offer numerous opportunities for intervention before the final step of fully developed malignancy has been reached. Immunoprevention of cancer may be a new approach to cancer control, by eliminating the cellular minimal deviations that are seen in the early phases of carcinogenesis. Available results of immunotherapy of preneoplastic lesions and data on anticarcinogenesis with immunoregulators in experimental models are in good accordance with theoretical expectations. However, clinical research on immunoregulators still focuses on the treatment of advanced cancer. The major problem hampering a wider application of immunoregulators in cancer prevention is the possibility of potential adverse effects, which are largely unknown. The promotion of future research in this area is essential. Moreover, the ethical issues of intervention trials in cancer must be discussed, by considering the potential psychological and social consequences.

Interferons in precancer and cancer prevention: where are we?

Clinical research on interferons (IFN) still focuses on the treatment of advanced cancer. The research strategy eventually must be reevaluated. The cellular minimal deviations that are seen in early phases of carcinogenesis might be the most rational target for immune interventions. That biologic response modifiers have considerable capacity to prevent induction and development of malignant neoplasias has been demonstrated in several animal systems. Even the few clinical studies available at present on the treatment of preneoplastic lesions with IFN have definitely shown more success than those involving treatment of advanced tumors. In addition, there is experimental evidence that IFN might be suitable candidates for immunoprevention. The major problems hampering a wider application of IFN in immunoprevention is that they cause adverse effects. Unfortunately, we do not know much about the specific mechanisms involved in the immune control of human tumor development during the initial and the latency phases of carcinogenesis. More research is needed in this area. In this article the state of the art of using IFN for treating preneoplastic lesions is reviewed, and also we report some of our experimental results on IFN and anticancerogenesis.

The therapy of oral lichen planus

Oral lichen planus is a chronic mucocutaneous disease that is relatively common. Although many patients are asymptomatic and require no therapy, those who exhibit atrophic and erosive lesions are often a challenge to treat. All therapies are palliative, and none is effective universally. Currently employed treatment modalities include corticosteroids administered topically, intralesionally, or systemically. Alternative therapies include topical and systemic retinoids, griseofulvin, Cyclosporine, and surgery. Other medical treatments and experimental modalities, including mouth PUVA, have been reported to be effective. Controversy concerning the efficacy of all these treatments suggests that oral lichen planus is a heterogeneous disorder. Eliminating lichenoid drug eruptions, candidiasis, trauma, contact mucositis, and emotional stress may play a role in the management of these patients. This article is a review of the many treatments and measures that have been employed in the management of patients with oral lichen planus.

Diagnosing and managing oral lichen planus

Lichen planus is a chronic and recurrent inflammatory disease characterized by unpredictable exacerbations and remissions. It affects the skin and/or mucous membrane in nearly 2 percent of the adult population. The symptoms are transient, but clinical evidence of oral disease is more persistent.

Oral lichen planus: the clinical, historical, and therapeutic features of 100 cases

Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory epidermal and mucosal disease, the cause of which is poorly understood. We reviewed the clinical and historic features of 100 patients referred to our clinic for diagnosis and management of lichen planus. The age, gender, chief complaint, duration of the chief complaint, medical history, medications, and clinical findings were recorded. Past therapeutic modalities were reviewed. Of therapeutic significance, 25 patients with oral lichen planus had a secondary oral candidiasis. Management of symptomatic lichen planus with topical and systemic steroid is discussed. The pharmacology of topical and systemic steroid usage and the rationale for treatment are discussed.

Interferon activity and its characterization in the sera of patients with premalignant lesions arising in oral mucosa

The interferon (IFN) assay of the sera from the 26 patients with premalignant lesions such as lichen planus and leukoplakia arising in oral mucosa was performed by the plaque-reduction assay with vesicular stomatitis virus in FL cells derived from human amniotic membrane. When the serum IFN activity was characterized by acid treatment, significant increase of acid-stable IFN in the patients was found as compared with those in the normal controls. The titers of gamma-like IFN defined by anti-HuIFN-alpha and anti-HuIFN-beta in the sera of patients of 50-79 years age group (n = 17, P less than 0.002) showed a highly significant increase as compared with the relevant normal controls (n = 20). All of the 26 patients were treated with topical administration of HuIFN-beta. When the correlation between prognosis of the disease and titers of serum IFN was investigated by measuring gamma-like IFN and acid-stable IFN in the sera of patients, all of 13 patients with good prognosis after the HuIFN-beta therapy showed significantly decreased levels of gamma-like IFN (P less than 0.01), whereas the serum level of acid-stable IFN after HuIFN-beta therapy showed a significant increase compared to that before the therapy (P less than 0.05). These findings indicate that the endogenous IFN system may be associated with the pathophysiology in patients with the oral mucosal lesions.