Benign, preinvasive and invasive ductal breast lesions. A comparative study with quantitative techniques: morphometry, image- and flow cytometry

Atypical ductal hyperplasia: update on diagnosis, management, and molecular landscape

BACKGROUND

Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) is a common diagnosis in the mammographic era and a significant clinical problem with wide variation in diagnosis and treatment. After a diagnosis of ADH on biopsy a proportion are upgraded to carcinoma upon excision; however, the remainder of patients are overtreated. While ADH is considered a non-obligate precursor of invasive carcinoma, the molecular taxonomy remains unknown.

MAIN TEXT

Although a few studies have revealed some of the key genomic characteristics of ADH, a clear understanding of the molecular changes associated with breast cancer progression has been limited by inadequately powered studies and low resolution methodology. Complicating factors such as family history, and whether the ADH present in a biopsy is an isolated lesion or part of a greater neoplastic process beyond the limited biopsy material, make accurate interpretation of genomic features and their impact on progression to malignancy a challenging task. This article will review the definitions and variable management of the patients diagnosed with ADH as well as the current knowledge of the molecular landscape of ADH and its clonal relationship with ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular data of ADH remain sparse. Large prospective cohorts of pure ADH with clinical follow-up need to be evaluated at DNA, RNA, and protein levels in order to develop biomarkers of progression to carcinoma to guide management decisions.

Role of Nuclear Morphometry in Breast Cancer and its Correlation with Cytomorphological Grading of Breast Cancer: A Study of 64 Cases

Background:

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a simple, rapid, inexpensive, and reliable method of diagnosis of breast mass. Cytoprognostic grading in breast cancers is important to identify high-grade tumors. Computer-assisted image morphometric analysis has been developed to quantitate as well as standardize various grading systems.

Aims:

To apply nuclear morphometry on cytological aspirates of breast cancer and evaluate its correlation with cytomorphological grading with derivation of suitable cutoff values between various grades.

Settings and Designs:

Descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study.

Materials and Methods:

This study included 64 breast cancer cases (29 of grade 1, 22 of grade 2, and 13 of grade 3). Image analysis was performed on Papanicolaou stained FNAC slides by NIS –Elements Advanced Research software (Ver 4.00). Nuclear morphometric parameters analyzed included 5 nuclear size, 2 shape, 4 texture, and 2 density parameters.

Results:

Nuclear size parameters showed an increase in values with increasing cytological grades of carcinoma. Nuclear shape parameters were not found to be significantly different between the three grades. Among nuclear texture parameters, sum intensity, and sum brightness were found to be different between the three grades.

Conclusion:

Nuclear morphometry can be applied to augment the cytology grading of breast cancer and thus help in classifying patients into low and high-risk groups.

Study of nuclear morphometry on cytology specimens of benign and malignant breast lesions: A study of 122 cases

Background:

Breast cancer has emerged as a leading site of cancer among women in India. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been routinely applied in assessment of breast lesions. Cytological evaluation in breast lesions is subjective with a “gray zone” of 6.9–20%. Quantitative evaluation of nuclear size, shape, texture, and density parameters by morphometry can be of diagnostic help in breast tumor.

Aims:

To apply nuclear morphometry on cytological breast aspirates and assess its role in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions with derivation of suitable cut-off values between the two groups.

Settings and Designs:

The present study was a descriptive cross-sectional hospital-based study of nuclear morphometric parameters of benign and malignant cases.

Materials and Methods:

The study included 50 benign breast disease (BBD), 8 atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), and 64 carcinoma cases. Image analysis was performed on Papanicolaou-stained FNAC slides by Nikon Imaging Software (NIS)–Elements Advanced Research software (Version 4.00). Nuclear morphometric parameters analyzed included 5 nuclear size, 2 shape, 4 texture, and 2 density parameters.

Results:

Nuclear morphometry could differentiate between benign and malignant aspirates with a gradually increasing nuclear size parameters from BBD to ADH to carcinoma. Cut-off values of 31.93 μm², 6.325 μm, 5.865 μm, 7.855 μm, and 21.55 μm for mean nuclear area, equivalent diameter, minimum feret, maximum ferret, and perimeter, respectively, were derived between benign and malignant cases, which could correctly classify 7 out of 8 ADH cases.

Conclusion:

Nuclear morphometry is a highly objective tool that could be used to supplement FNAC in differentiating benign from malignant lesions, with an important role in cases with diagnostic dilemma.

Morphometric and histological study of breast lesions with special reference to proliferative activity and invasiveness

Breast carcinoma is the most common cause of carcinoma death in women. Sometimes, difficulty arises to differentiate between premalignant lesions and carcinoma by routine histopathology. Our study was done to establish the role of morphometry and immunohistochemistry to solve this problem. In this study, total 60 cases of different breast lesions were included and 10 controls were also included to compare the results with the normal findings. They were studied by hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections for morphometry and routine histological study; as well as by proliferative markers such as proliferating cell nuclear antigen and p53. Invasiveness was studied using immunohistochemical staining with 34 βE12 monoclonal antibody. Statistically significant differences were found in morphometric parameters and in expression of proliferative markers between most of them. Morphometry and immunohistochemistry help in the proper diagnosis of different breast lesions that lie in the gray zone on routine histopathology.

Significance of nuclear morphometry in cytological aspirates of breast masses

BACKGROUND

Breast carcinoma is the most common malignancy globally. Cytological evaluation in breast lesions is largely subjective. Gradual progression of cells from normal to invasive involves nuclear changes that need to be viewed objectively.

AIMS

This study aims to apply nuclear morphometry on cytological breast aspirates. It evaluates its utility in differentiating benign vs. malignant lesions and correlates it with cytologic grading in malignant cases.

SETTING AND DESIGN

Nuclear morphometric parameters of malignant and benign cases were compared. Parameters of malignant cases were correlated with cytologic grading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytology was used to categorize aspirates from breast lumps into malignant (53 cases) and benign (29 cases). One hundred cells per case in both groups were mapped on DEBEL Cytoscan and six geometrical and three textural parameters obtained were compared. In malignant cases, morphometry was correlated with Robinson's cytologic grading, which was further correlated in tissue sections (45 cases) with modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson histologic grading.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Students "t"-test was applied for comparison between benign and malignant cases. One-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post hoc comparison was applied to compare the three cytologic grades. Results were considered significant when P<0.05.

RESULTS

Nuclear morphometry successfully differentiated between benign and malignant aspirates and correlated significantly with cytologic grades. Morphometry was especially useful in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. Useful parameters were mean nuclear area, long axis, short axis and total run length. Cytohistologic correlation was 83.3%, 88.9% and 88.9% for cytological grades 1, 2 and 3 respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Nuclear morphometry was thus a useful objective tool in the evaluation of breast masses.

Discrepancies in the diagnosis of intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast and its management implications: results of a multinational survey

To measure discrepancies in diagnoses and recommendations impacting management of proliferative lesions of the breast, a questionnaire of five problem scenarios was distributed among over 300 practicing pathologists. Of the 230 respondents, 56.5% considered a partial cribriform proliferation within a duct adjacent to unequivocal ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), 37.7% of whom recommended reexcision if it were at a resection margin. Of the 43.5% who diagnosed the partially involved duct as DCIS, 28.0% would not recommend reexcision if the lesion were at a margin. When only five ducts had a partial cribriform proliferation, 35.7% considered it as DCIS, while if >or=20 ducts were so involved, this figure rose to 60.4%. When one duct with a complete cribriform pattern measured 0.5, 1.5, or 4 mm, a diagnosis of DCIS was made by 22.6, 31.3, and 94.8%, respectively. When multiple ducts with flat epithelial atypia were at a margin, 20.9% recommended reexcision. Much of these discrepancies arise from the artificial separation of ADH and low-grade DCIS and emphasize the need for combining these two under the umbrella designation of ductal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (DIN 1) to diminish the impact of different terminologies applied to biologically similar lesions.

Nuclear morphometric features in benign breast tissue and risk of subsequent breast cancer

Certain nuclear morphometric features measured in breast tumor tissue have been shown to predict the prognosis of breast cancer patients. However, the application of these features to predicting risk of breast cancer development has received little attention. We conducted a case-control study to evaluate nuclear morphometric features in benign breast tissue in association with subsequent breast cancer risk. The study was nested within a cohort of 4,888 women with a histopathologic diagnosis of benign breast disease (BBD) and involved 61 cases and 71 controls, amongst whom there were 53 matched case-control sets. Conditional logistic regression models were fitted to assess various measurements of nuclear size and nuclear shape factors in relation to subsequent breast cancer risk. In multivariate analysis, subsequent breast cancer risk was positively associated with a nuclear shape factor that takes the shortest nuclear axis and the longest nuclear axis into consideration simultaneously (highest quartile versus lowest 3 quartiles: odds ratio = 3.07, 95% confidence limits = 1.61, 5.84). In contrast, there was no alteration in subsequent breast cancer risk in association with nuclear size features and other shape factors. In conclusion, our study results suggest that the shape factor that takes both the shortest nuclear axis and the longest nuclear axis into consideration might be of value to predict subsequent development of breast cancer among women with BBD.

Implementation of DNA cytometric measurements in fine-needle aspiration biopsy diagnostics of breast disease

BACKGROUND

For this study, the diagnostic protocol included fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and DNA cytometric measurements. The objective of the study was to improve the diagnostic sensitivity of FNAB.

METHODS

Sixty-eight FNAB samples were stained using the Feulgen stain, and DNA histograms were produced by selecting the nuclei of cell groups and free cells separately.

RESULTS

Among 28 samples that were classified as definitely benign (n = 17 samples) or atypical but benign (n = 11 samples), DNA cytometry generally showed diploid/peridiploid peaks. Three of those samples were associated later with carcinoma. In those samples DNA cytometry did not improve sensitivity. Among moderately atypical samples (n = 17 samples), 8 samples were diagnosed later as carcinoma. DNA cytometry helped the diagnostic procedure in 62.5% of those samples. Among 21 samples that were classified as highly suspicious (n = 10 samples) or definitely malignant (n = 11 samples), DNA cytometry generally showed atypical DNA histograms (20 of 21 histograms), and DNA cytometry supported the diagnosis of carcinoma in 95.2%. Histograms that were based on free cells frequently were more abnormal compared with histograms that were based on cell groups. Histologically verified benign lesions also could show abnormalities in DNA histograms. Accepting wider gates than are used normally for primarily Feulgen stained samples on these restained samples resulted in improved specificity, efficiency, and predictive values.

CONCLUSIONS

DNA cytometry has a potential to support the differential diagnosis of breast lesions, and sampling of free cells increases sensitivity. Benign breast lesions (fibrocystic disease, fibroadenoma) included DNA-cytometrically abnormal cell clones and showed tendencies toward polyploidy, which should be included in the diagnostic criteria.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparative analysis of histology, nuclear area, ploidy, and neovascularization provides differentiation between low- and high-grade tumors

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous group of lesions that has been subdivided into three types: well differentiated (grade I), moderately differentiated (grade II), and poorly differentiated (grade III). Forty-five cases of DCIS were analyzed for image analysis: nuclear area, DNA ploidy, and vascularization in order to establish a more precise correlation between the histologic grade and these morphometric parameters. Our results confirm that the mean nuclear area, DNA ploidy, and microvessel density (MVD) progressively increased from DCIS grade I to DCIS grade III. The analysis of the nuclear area in relationship to DCIS grading demonstrated a progressive increase of values between grades I/II to grade III, but these data have no statistical significance. An analysis of DNA ploidy demonstrated significant differences between grades I/III (p < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between grades I/II, grades II/III, or both (p > 0.005). The analysis of MVD was extremely significant between grades I/III (p < 0.001) and grades II/III (p < 0.001), but between grades I/II, these values showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). Based on this study, it can be concluded that image analysis techniques confirm how DCIS presents morphometric values that increase from DCIS grade I to DCIS grade III and that within this spectrum, DCIS grade III can be identified as a group of tumors presenting a large nuclear area, aneuploid DNA, and abundant vascular neogenesis, confirming that this neoplasm displays more aggressive patterns than the other two types. These criteria should justify a higher rate of tumor progression to DCIS grade III.

Similarity in expression of cell cycle proteins between in situ and invasive ductal breast lesions of same differentiation grade

There is increasing evidence that there are different progression routes leading to invasive breast cancer, depending on histology and differentiation grade. The aim of this study was to determine alterations in the expression of proteins involved in proliferation and apoptosis in non-invasive and invasive ductal breast lesions. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 106 usual ductal hyperplasias (UDH), 61 DCIS lesions and 53 invasive ductal breast carcinomas. Increased proliferation (Ki67), overexpression of cyclin D1, HER-2/neu, p21 and p53, and decreased expression of bcl-2 and p27 could already be found in UDH. Significant differences between UDH and DCIS lesions were found for only one protein when UDH was compared with well-differentiated DCIS (p27), for three proteins when compared with intermediately differentiated DCIS (p21, cyclin D1, Ki-67), and for all proteins when compared with poorly-differentiated DCIS. Comparing DCIS with invasive lesions of same differentiation grade, proliferation was elevated in the invasive lesions. Altered expression of the other proteins was in general only slightly increased in the invasive lesion compared with DCIS. The number of proteins with altered expression per lesion was highest in poorly-differentiated lesions and was comparable between DCIS and invasive cancer of the same differentiation grade. In conclusion, the biggest changes in expression of these proliferation and apoptosis related proteins appear to occur during the transition from hyperplasia to DCIS; they probably play a minor role in the transition from DCIS to invasive breast lesion of same differentiation grade. Well-differentiated in situ and invasive breast lesions share many of the aberrations in expression of these proteins, as do poorly-differentiated in situ and invasive lesions. However, there are many differences between the well and poorly-differentiated lesions. This further supports the existence of different progression routes leading to breast cancer.