A pilot study of preoperative continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil, external microwave hyperthermia, and external beam radiotherapy for treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer

The future opportunities and remaining challenges in the application of nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia combined with chemo-radiotherapy in cancer

A pivotal cause of death in the modern world, cancer is an insidious pathology that should be diagnosed at an early stage for successful treatment. Development of therapeutic interventions with minimal invasiveness and high efficacy that can discriminate between tumor and normal cells is of particular interest to the clinical science, as they can enhance patient survival. Nanoparticles are an invaluable asset that can be adopted for development of such diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, since they come in very small sizes with modifiable surface, are highly safe and stable, and can be synthesized in a controlled fashion. To date, different nanoparticles have been incorporated into numerous modalities such as tumor-targeted therapy, thermal therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. This review article seeks to deliver a brief account of recent advances in research and application of nanoparticles in hyperthermia-based cancer therapies. The most recent investigations are summarized to highlight the latest advances in the development of combined thermo-chemo-radiotherapy, along with the challenges associated with the application of nanoparticles in cancer therapy. This article is categorized under: Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease.

Magnetite Nanoparticles in Magnetic Hyperthermia and Cancer Therapies: Challenges and Perspectives

Until now, strategies used to treat cancer are imperfect, and this generates the need to search for better and safer solutions. The biggest issue is the lack of selective interaction with neoplastic cells, which is associated with occurrence of side effects and significantly reduces the effectiveness of therapies. The use of nanoparticles in cancer can counteract these problems. One of the most promising nanoparticles is magnetite. Implementation of this nanoparticle can improve various treatment methods such as hyperthermia, targeted drug delivery, cancer genotherapy, and protein therapy. In the first case, its feature makes magnetite useful in magnetic hyperthermia. Interaction of magnetite with the altered magnetic field generates heat. This process results in raised temperature only in a desired part of a patient body. In other therapies, magnetite-based nanoparticles could serve as a carrier for various types of therapeutic load. The magnetic field would direct the drug-related magnetite nanoparticles to the pathological site. Therefore, this material can be used in protein and gene therapy or drug delivery. Since the magnetite nanoparticle can be used in various types of cancer treatment, they are extensively studied. Herein, we summarize the latest finding on the applicability of the magnetite nanoparticles, also addressing the most critical problems faced by smart nanomedicine in oncological therapies.

Deep regional hyperthermia combined with modern concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases T-downstaging rate in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Deep regional hyperthermia might have an additional effect on radiotherapy in treating locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This study aimed to investigate the role of hyperthermia combined with modern preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for LARC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 2012 to 2018, 152 consecutive patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. Pelvic radiotherapy (45-50 Gy) was delivered as volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), concurrently with capecitabine chemotherapy. Fifty patients received hyperthermia combined with CRT (HCRT group) twice a week. Treatment response and outcomes were compared between the two groups. Furthermore, the relationships between peripheral blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in response to hyperthermia were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients treated with hyperthermia had a significantly higher T-downstaging rate than those without hyperthermia (82.0 vs. 62.7%; p = .016). Hyperthermia was an independent favorable predictor of T-downstaging (odds ratio [OR] = 2.473; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.050-5.826; p = .038). In the HCRT group, a pre-therapeutic elevated NLR (≥3) was associated with a higher T-downstaging rate (100.0 vs. 73.5%, p = .043). However, NLR was not associated with the T-downstaging rate in the CRT group. Five-year rates of locoregional recurrence-free survival (96.8 vs. 94.7%, p = .959), disease-free survival (DFS; 61.4 vs. 79.3%, p = .242), and overall survival (OS; 92.7 vs. 89.8%, p = .831) were not statistically different between the CRT and HCRT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperthermia can improve preoperative treatment response in LARC. Pretreatment NLR may be a predictive factor for hyperthermia.

Emerging hyperthermia applications for pediatric oncology

Local application of hyperthermia has a myriad of effects on the tumor microenvironment as well as the host's immune system. Ablative hyperthermia (typically > 55 °C) has been used both as monotherapy and adjuvant therapy, while mild hyperthermia treatment (39-45 °C) demonstrated efficacy as an adjuvant therapy through enhancement of both chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Clinical integration of hyperthermia has especially great potential in pediatric oncology, where current chemotherapy regimens have reached maximum tolerability and the young age of patients implies significant risks of late effects related to therapy. Furthermore, activation of both local and systemic immune response by hyperthermia suggests that hyperthermia treatments could be used to enhance the anticancer effects of immunotherapy. This review summarizes the state of current applications of hyperthermia in pediatric oncology and discusses the use of hyperthermia in the context of other available treatments and promising pre-clinical research.

Long-term local control and survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy in combination with deep regional hyperthermia in locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of deep regional hyperthermia on long-term local control and survival in locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer.

METHODS

In total 103 patients with locally advanced non-metastatic rectal cancer were treated preoperatively with either neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy alone (n = 43) or the same treatment with additional deep regional hyperthermia (n = 60). The two groups were compared with respect to local control, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS).

RESULTS

Patients receiving additional hyperthermia had excellent long-term local control with a 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate of 98% compared with 87% in the radiochemotherapy only group (p = 0.09). Five-year rates for OS (88% versus 76%, p = 0.08), DFS (77% versus 73%, p = n.s.) and DMFS (75% versus 77%, p = n.s.) were not statistically different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Radiochemotherapy combined with hyperthermia results in excellent long-term local control.

Advances in hyperthermia technology

Hyperthermia is a type of cancer treatment in which body tissue is exposed to high temperatures. Research has shown that high temperatures can damage and kill cancer cells, usually with minimal injury to normal tissues. In the clinical application of hyperthermia, three methods can be distinguished: local, regional and whole-body hyperthermia. Hyperthermia is under study in clinical trials and is not widely available. So further technological improvements will need to contribute to an easier and better controlled adequate application of hyperthermia.

Targeting vaccinia to solid tumors with local hyperthermia

We have previously demonstrated that mutant vaccinia viruses target tumors in vivo after systemic delivery, and they have potential as vectors for tumor-directed gene therapy. We hypothesized that hyperthermia may augment vaccinia delivery to tumors after systemic injection, as hyperthermia increases the permeability of the endothelial vasculature to nanoparticles. In our in vitro experiments, we have shown that hyperthermia does not alter tumor cells' susceptibility to the intrinsic cytopathogenicity of the vaccinia virus compared with normothermic controls. Hyperthermia also does not change the viral infectivity or the level of viral marker gene expression when compared with normothermia. In an in vitro model of endothelial cell monolayer permeability, we have demonstrated that hyperthermia increases the permeability of the monolayer to vaccinia virus and that this phenomenon is completely reversible. In vivo we have demonstrated that the tumors that were treated with systemic vaccinia under conditions of hyperthermia (41.5 degrees C for 30 min) had significantly higher levels of vaccinia marker gene activity (>100-fold) than those treated under normothermic conditions (p < 0.05) and that this effect was specific to tumor. We also demonstrated that mice with 1 cm subcutaneous tumors treated with a systemically delivered, conditionally replicating vaccinia under conditions of hyperthermia had complete tumor regression in 50% and significantly improved antitumor response, compared with normothermic viral-treated controls (mean tumor volume of 110 mm(3) vs 3169 mm(3), 13 days after treatment) and compared with hyperthermic, nonvirally treated control animals (p < 0.0001). Regional hyperthermia improves vaccinia targeting to tumors, and thereby enhances the antitumor response.

Raltitrexed plus radiotherapy for the treatment of unresectable/recurrent rectal cancer: a phase I study

BACKGROUND

Current consensus is that a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy may provide the optimal treatment for patients with unresectable rectal cancer. Raltitrexed has proven efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and has an acceptable toxicity profile. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable/recurrent rectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with radiotherapy (25 fractions at 2.0 Gy per fraction) five times per week for 5 weeks. Raltitrexed was administered on days 1 and 22 at 2.0, 2.6 and 3.0 mg/m(2).

RESULTS

A total of 20 patients were entered into the study. Dose-limiting toxicities were recorded in three of 20 patients following the first dose of raltitrexed; one patient at 2.6 mg/m(2) (grade 3 diarrhoea, grade 3 neutropenia and grade 2 pyrexia) and two patients at 3.0 mg/m(2) (one grade 3 neutropenia and one grade 4 diarrhoea). The most common non-haematological and haematological treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (11 of 20, two grade 3, one grade 4) and leukopenia (eight of 20, one grade 3, one grade 4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with radiotherapy for future studies is 2.6 mg/m(2).

Heating the patient: a promising approach?

There is a clear rationale for using hyperthermia in cancer treatment. Treatment at temperatures between 40 and 44 degrees C is cytotoxic for cells in an environment with a low pO(2) and low pH, conditions that are found specifically within tumour tissue, due to insufficient blood perfusion. Under such conditions radiotherapy is less effective, and systemically applied cytotoxic agents will reach such areas in lower concentrations than in well perfused areas. Therefore, the addition of hyperthermia to radiotherapy or chemotherapy will result in at least an additive effect. Furthermore, the effects of both radiotherapy and many drugs are enhanced at an increased temperature. Hyperthermia can be applied by several methods: local hyperthermia by external or internal energy sources, regional hyperthermia by perfusion of organs or limbs, or by irrigation of body cavities, and whole body hyperthermia. The use of hyperthermia alone has resulted in complete overall response rates of 13%. The clinical value of hyperthermia in addition to other treatment modalities has been shown in randomised trials. Significant improvement in clinical outcome has been demonstrated for tumours of the head and neck, breast, brain, bladder, cervix, rectum, lung, oesophagus, vulva and vagina, and also for melanoma. Additional hyperthermia resulted in remarkably higher (complete) response rates, accompanied by improved local tumour control rates, better palliative effects and/or better overall survival rates. Generally, when combined with radiotherapy, no increase in radiation toxicity could be demonstrated. Whether toxicity from chemotherapy is enhanced depends on sequence of the two modalities, and on which tissues are heated. Toxicity from hyperthermia cannot always be avoided, but is usually of limited clinical relevance. Recent developments include improvements in heating techniques and thermometry, development of hyperthermia treatment planning models, studies on heat shock proteins and an effect on anti-cancer immune responses, drug targeting to tumours, bone marrow purging, combination with drugs targeting tumour vasculature, and the role of hyperthermia in gene therapy. The clinical results achieved to date have confirmed the expectations raised by results from experimental studies. These findings justify using hyperthermia as part of standard treatment in tumour sites for which its efficacy has been proven and, furthermore, to initiate new studies with other tumours. Hyperthermia is certainly a promising approach and deserves more attention than it has received until now.

Adjuvant therapy of resectable rectal cancer

The two conventional treatments for clinically resectable rectal cancer are surgery followed by postoperative combined modality therapy and preoperative combined modality therapy followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy. Preoperative therapy (most commonly combined modality therapy) has gained acceptance as a standard adjuvant therapy. The potential advantages of the preoperative approach include decreased tumor seeding, less acute toxicity, increased radiosensitivity due to more oxygenated cells, and enhanced sphincter preservation. There are a number of new chemotherapeutic agents that have been developed for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Phase I/II trials examining the use of new chemotherapeutic agents in combination with pelvic radiation therapy are in progress.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of proximal rectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

Clinical trials demonstrate the superiority of preoperative over postoperative radiotherapy (XRT) in diminishing rates of local recurrence of transmurally infiltrating (T3/4) rectal tumors. The dosage and cost of preoperative XRT are less than postoperative XRT. The economic and health impact of transrectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) on rectal cancer management has not been described. The aim of this study was to apply a decision analysis model to compare the cost-effectiveness of three staging strategies in the evaluation of nonmetastatic proximal rectal cancer: abdominal and pelvic CT versus abdominal CT plus EUS versus abdominal CT plus pelvic magnetic resonance imaging.

METHODS

A decision model was designed using DATA Version 3.5 (TreeAge Software, Williamstown, MA), taking as entry criteria nonmetastatic proximal rectal cancer as determined by abdominal CT. In each arm, detection of transmural invasion prompted preoperative XRT. Baseline probabilities were varied through plausible ranges using sensitivity analysis. Cost inputs were based on Medicare professional plus facility fees. Endpoints were cost of treatment per patient and tumor recurrence-free rates. Cost-effectiveness (cost per prevention of local recurrence) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated.

RESULTS

For proximal rectal tumors, evaluation with abdominal CT plus EUS is the most cost-effective approach ($24,468/yr) compared with abdominal CT plus pelvic magnetic resonance imaging ($24,870) and CT alone ($26,076). Both the magnetic resonance imaging- and CT-only approaches were dominated (i.e., more costly and less effective).

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal CT plus EUS is the most cost-effective staging strategy for nonmetastatic proximal rectal cancer. Staging strategies incorporating EUS improve treatment allocation by achieving more accurate T staging, thereby optimizing the benefit of preoperative XRT to more advanced tumors.

Hyperthermia for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

In order to improve the clinical results of rectal cancer, hyperthermia has been prescribed in combination with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The techniques of hyperthermia and their clinical applications to rectal cancer were reviewed.

METHODS

The development of heating devices has been intensively investigated, including external heating devices, intraluminal heating devices, circulation of warmed saline solution, and whole body hyperthermia.

RESULTS

Nonrandomized and randomized trials for rectal cancer have demonstrated an improved local response with the combined use of hyperthermia and conventional treatments. A preoperative therapy with hyperthermia increased resectability and decreased local recurrence, resulting in the improvement of the postoperative prognosis. There were no major postoperative complications related to the preoperative treatment. A lower incidence of local recurrence was observed in groups that underwent intra- or postoperative hyperthermia treatment, as compared with control groups. In cases with unresectable or local recurrent rectal cancer, hyperthermia achieved a local tumor regression and prolonged pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical data suggest that hyperthermia combined with radiation or chemotherapy demonstrates great promise for the treatment of patients with carcinoma of the rectum.

Local hyperthermia, radiation, and chemotherapy in recurrent breast cancer is feasible and effective except for inflammatory disease

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of radiochemothermotherapy (triple-modality therapy) in patients with inoperable recurrent breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable recurrent lesions, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status of 2 or greater, life expectancy of more than 3 months, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function were eligible for this Phase I/II study. Conventionally fractionated or hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) was performed. Once-weekly local hyperthermia (HT) combined with chemotherapy (CT; epirubicin 20 mg/m(2), ifosfamide 1.5 g/m(2)) was applied within 30 min after RT.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients, all heavily pretreated (18/25 preirradiated), received a mean total dose of 49 Gy. The median number of HT/CT sessions was 4. Skin toxicity was low, whereas bone marrow toxicity was significant (leucopenia Grade 3/4 in 14/1 patients). The overall response rate was 80% with a complete response (CR) rate of 44%. Response rates in patients with noninflammatory disease (n = 14; CR 10 patients, partial response [PR] 3 patients) were far better than in patients with inflammatory disease (n = 11; CR 1 patient, PR 6 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with recurrent breast cancer, triple-modality therapy is feasible with acceptable toxicity. High remission rates can be achieved in noninflammatory disease, however, local control is limited to a few months. Whether the addition of chemotherapy has a clear-cut advantage to radiothermotherapy alone remains an open question.