Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate

Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) is used clinically for directly assessing prostate motion. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in TPUS motion estimation must be assessed to realise its full potential.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were imaged using volumetric TPUS during the Clarity-Pro trial (NCT02388308). Prostate motion was measured online at patient set-up and offline by experienced observers. Cone beam CT with markers was used as a comparator and observer performance was also quantified. The influence of different clinical factors was examined to establish specific recommendations towards efficacious ultrasound guided radiotherapy.

RESULTS

From 330 fractions in 22 patients, offline observer random errors were 1.5 mm, 1.3 mm, 1.9 mm (left-right, superior-inferior, anteroposterior respectively). Errors increased in fractions exhibiting poor image quality to 3.3 mm, 3.3 mm and 6.8 mm. Poor image quality was associated with inconsistent probe placement, large anatomical changes and unfavourable imaging conditions within the patient. Online matching exhibited increased observer errors of: 3.2 mm, 2.9 mm and 4.7 mm. Four patients exhibited large systematic residual errors, of which three had poor quality images. Patient habitus showed no correlation with observer error, residual error, or image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

TPUS offers the unique potential to directly assess inter- and intra-fraction motion on conventional linacs. Inconsistent image quality, inexperienced operators and the pressures of the clinical environment may degrade precision and accuracy. Experienced operators are essential and cross-centre standards for training and QA should be established that build upon current guidance. Greater use of automation technologies may further minimise uncertainties.

Study of normal tissue dosimetric benefit using asymmetric margin-based biological fuzzy decision making: volumetric modulated arc therapy of prostate cancer

Aim:

Radiation therapy has historically used margins for target volume to ensure dosimetric planning criteria. The size of margin for a given treatment site is still uncertain particularly for moving targets along with set-up variations leading to a fuzziness of target volume. In this study, we have estimated the dosimetric benefit of normal structures using biological-based optimal margins. The treatment margins are derived by knowledge-based fuzzy logic technique which is considering the radiotherapy uncertainties in treatment planning.

Materials and methods:

All treatment plans were performed using stepped increments of asymmetric margins to estimate prostate radiobiological indices such as tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). An absolute NTCP of 5% was considered to be the maximum acceptable value while TCP of 85% was considered to be the minimal acceptable limit for each volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan of localised prostate cancer radiotherapy. Results were used to formulate rules and membership functions for Mamdani-type fuzzy inference system (FIS). In implementing the rules for the fuzzy system for ΔNTCP values above 10%, the PTV margin was not permitted to exceed 5 mm to avoid rectal complications due to margin selection. The new margins were applied in VMAT planning of prostate cancer for standard displacement errors. The dosimetric results of normal tissue predictors were estimated such as organ mean doses, rectum V60 (volume receiving 60 Gy), bladder V65 (volume receiving 65 Gy) and other clinically significant dose–volume indicators and compared with VMAT plans using current margin formulations.

Results:

Dosimetric results compared well to the results obtained by current techniques. Good agreement was obtained between proposed fuzzy model margins and currently used margins in lower error magnitude, but significant results were observed at higher error magnitude when organ toxicity concerned without compromising the target volumes.

Findings:

The new margins may be helpful to estimate possible outcomes of normal tissue complications and thus may improve complication free survival particularly when organ motion errors are inevitable, case by case.

Ct Image Fusion as a Tool for Measuring in 3D the Setup Errors during Conformal Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Aims and Background

The importance of optimal daily patient positioning has been stressed in order to ensure treatment reproducibility and gain in accuracy and precision. We report our data on the 3D setup uncertainty during radiation therapy for prostate cancer using the CT image fusion technique.

Methods

Ten consecutive patients scheduled for radiation therapy for prostate cancer underwent 5 prone position CT scans using an individualized immobilization cast. These different setups were analyzed using the image fusion module of the ERGO 3D-Line Medical System (Milan, Italy) treatment planning system. The isocenter and the body marker displacements were measured.

Results

The 3D isocenter dislocations were quantified: systematic error was Σ3D = 3.9 mm, whereas random error was σ3D = 1 mm. The mean of the minimum displacements was 0.2 ± 1 mm showing that the immobilization device used allows an accurate setup to be obtained. Single direction errors were also measured showing systematic errors, ΣAP = 2.6 mm, ΣLL = 0.6 mm, ΣSI = 3 mm in the anterior-posterior, latero-lateral, superior-inferior direction, respectively. Related random errors were σAP = 1 mm, σLL = 0.6 mm, σSI = 1.2 mm. In terms of accuracy, our uncertainties are similar to those reported in the literature.

Conclusions

By applying the CT image fusion technique, a 3D study on setup accuracy was performed. We demonstrated that the use of an individualized immobilization system for prostate treatment is adequate to obtain good setup accuracy, as long as a high-quality positioning control method, such as the stereoscopic X-ray-based positioning system, is used.

Intraprostatic Fiducials Compared with Bony Anatomy and Skin Marks for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer

Purpose

Prostate motion occurs during radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. We evaluated the input of intraprostatic fiducials for image-guided radiation therapy and compared it with bony anatomy and skin marks.

Methods

Eleven patients were implanted with three fiducial markers in the prostate. Daily sets of orthogonal kV-kV images were compared with digitally reconstructed radiography. Data were recorded for skin marks, bony anatomy, and fiducial markers. The variations were analyzed along three principal axes (left-right: LR, superoinferior: SI, and anteroposterior: AP).

Results

A total of 2,417 measures were recorded over 38 fractions of radiotherapy (76 Gy). Fiducial marker movements from bony anatomy were ≤ 5 mm for 84.2% (confidence interval: CI 95%±1.5), 91.3% (CI 95%±1.1), and 99.5% (CI 95%±0.4) of the measures along the AP, SI, and LR axes, respectively. Ninety-five percent of the shifts between a fiducial marker and the bony anatomy were < 8 mm in the AP and SI axes, and < 3 mm in the LR axis. Fiducial marker movements from skin marks were ≤ 5 mm for 64.8% (CI 95%±1.9), 79.2% (CI 95%±1.6), and 87.2% (CI 95%±1.3) of the measures along the AP, SI, and LR axes, respectively. Bony anatomy movements from skin marks were ≤ 5 mm for 84% (CI 95%±1.4), 92% (CI 95%±1.1), and 87% (CI 95%±1.3) of the measurements along the AP, SI, and LR axes, respectively.

Conclusion

Using fiducial markers provides better accuracy of repositioning of the prostate than using bony anatomy and skin marks for image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Automatic x-ray image contrast enhancement based on parameter auto-optimization

Purpose

Insufficient image contrast associated with radiation therapy daily setup x‐ray images could negatively affect accurate patient treatment setup. We developed a method to perform automatic and user‐independent contrast enhancement on 2D kilo voltage (kV) and megavoltage (MV) x‐ray images. The goal was to provide tissue contrast optimized for each treatment site in order to support accurate patient daily treatment setup and the subsequent offline review.

Methods

The proposed method processes the 2D x‐ray images with an optimized image processing filter chain, which consists of a noise reduction filter and a high‐pass filter followed by a contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization (CLAHE) filter. The most important innovation is to optimize the image processing parameters automatically to determine the required image contrast settings per disease site and imaging modality. Three major parameters controlling the image processing chain, i.e., the Gaussian smoothing weighting factor for the high‐pass filter, the block size, and the clip limiting parameter for the CLAHE filter, were determined automatically using an interior‐point constrained optimization algorithm.

Results

Fifty‐two kV and MV x‐ray images were included in this study. The results were manually evaluated and ranked with scores from 1 (worst, unacceptable) to 5 (significantly better than adequate and visually praise worthy) by physicians and physicists. The average scores for the images processed by the proposed method, the CLAHE, and the best window‐level adjustment were 3.92, 2.83, and 2.27, respectively. The percentage of the processed images received a score of 5 were 48, 29, and 18%, respectively.

Conclusion

The proposed method is able to outperform the standard image contrast adjustment procedures that are currently used in the commercial clinical systems. When the proposed method is implemented in the clinical systems as an automatic image processing filter, it could be useful for allowing quicker and potentially more accurate treatment setup and facilitating the subsequent offline review and verification.

Improved outcomes with dose escalation in localized prostate cancer treated with precision image-guided radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dose-escalated radiotherapy (DE) improves outcomes in localized prostate cancer (PCa). The impact of DE in the context of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) remains unknown. Herein, we determined outcomes of three sequential cohorts treated with progressive DE-IGRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 1998 to 2012. Patients treated with radical radiotherapy were included, with three sequential institutional schedules: (A) 75.6Gy, (B) 79.8Gy, (C) 78Gy, with 1.8, 1.9 and 2Gy/fraction, respectively. IGRT consisted of fiducial markers and daily EPID (A, B) or CBCT (C).

RESULTS

961 patients were included, with median follow-up of 6.1y. 30.5%, 32.6% and 36.9% were treated in A, B and C, respectively. Risk category distribution was 179 (18.6%) low-, 653 (67.9%) intermediate- and 129 (13.5%) high-risk. PSA, T-category, androgen deprivation use and risk distribution were similar among groups. BCR (biochemical recurrence) was different (p<0.001) between A, B and C with 5-year rates of 23%, 17% and 9%, respectively (HR 2.68 [95% CI 1.87-3.85] and 1.92 [95% CI 1.33-2.78] for A and B compared to C, respectively). Findings were most significant in the intermediate-risk category. Metastasis, cause-specific-death and toxicities were not different between cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest continuous BCR improvement with progressive DE-IGRT. Prospective validation considering further DE with IGRT seems warranted.

'Compromise position' image alignment to accommodate independent motion of multiple clinical target volumes during radiotherapy: A high risk prostate cancer example

INTRODUCTION

Inclusion of multiple independently moving clinical target volumes (CTVs) in the irradiated volume causes an image guidance conundrum. The purpose of this research was to use high risk prostate cancer as a clinical example to evaluate a 'compromise' image alignment strategy.

METHODS

The daily pre-treatment orthogonal EPI for 14 consecutive patients were included in this analysis. Image matching was performed by aligning to the prostate only, the bony pelvis only and using the 'compromise' strategy. Residual CTV surrogate displacements were quantified for each of the alignment strategies.

RESULTS

Analysis of the 388 daily fractions indicated surrogate displacements were well-correlated in all directions (r²  = 0.95 (LR), 0.67 (AP) and 0.59 (SI). Differences between the surrogates displacements (95% range) were -0.4 to 1.8 mm (LR), -1.2 to 5.2 mm (SI) and -1.2 to 5.2 mm (AP). The distribution of the residual displacements was significantly smaller using the 'compromise' strategy, compared to the other strategies (p 0.005). The 'compromise' strategy ensured the CTV was encompassed by the PTV in all fractions, compared to 47 PTV violations when aligned to prostate only.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated the feasibility of a compromise position image guidance strategy to accommodate simultaneous displacements of two independently moving CTVs. Application of this strategy was facilitated by correlation between the CTV displacements and resulted in no geometric excursions of the CTVs beyond standard sized PTVs. This simple image guidance strategy may also be applicable to other disease sites that concurrently irradiate multiple CTVs, such as head and neck, lung and cervix cancer.

Dosimetric impact of different bladder and rectum filling during prostate cancer radiotherapy

Background

The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of volumetric changes of bladder and rectum filling on the 3D dose distribution in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 314 cone-beam CT (CBCT) image data sets from 19 patients were enrolled in this study. For each CBCT, the bladder and rectum were contoured and volume sizes were normalized to those on their original CT. The daily delivered dose was recalculated on the CBCT images and the doses to bladder and rectum were investigated. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify the mean dose change of the volume change using SPSS 19.

Results

The data show that the variances of the normalized volume of the bladder and the rectum are 0.13–0.58 and 0.12–0.50 respectively. The variances of V_70Gy, V_60Gy, V_50Gy, V_40Gy and V_30Gy of bladder are bigger than those of rectum for 17 patients. The linear regression analysis indicates a 10 % increase in bladder volume will cause a 5.6 % (±4.9 %) reduction in mean dose (p <0.05).

Conclusions

The bladder’s volume change is more significant than that of the rectum for the prostate cancer patient. The rectum volume variations are not significant except for air bubbles, which change the shape and the position of the rectum. The bladder volume variations may cause dose changes proportionately. Monitoring the bladder’s volume before fractional treatment delivery will be crucial for accurate dose delivery.

Feasibility of differential geometry-based features in detection of anatomical feature points on patient surfaces in range image-guided radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of differential geometry features in the detection of anatomical feature points on a patient surface in infrared-ray-based range images in image-guided radiation therapy.

METHODS

The key technology was to reconstruct the patient surface in the range image, i.e., point distribution with three-dimensional coordinates, and characterize the geometrical shape at every point based on curvature features. The region of interest on the range image was extracted by using a template matching technique, and the range image was processed for reducing temporal and spatial noise. Next, a mathematical smooth surface of the patient was reconstructed from the range image by using a non-uniform rational B-splines model. The feature points were detected based on curvature features computed on the reconstructed surface. The framework was tested on range images acquired by a time-of-flight (TOF) camera and a Kinect sensor for two surface (texture) types of head phantoms A and B that had different anatomical geometries. The detection accuracy was evaluated by measuring the residual error, i.e., the mean of minimum Euclidean distances (MMED) between reference (ground truth) and detected feature points on convex and concave regions.

RESULTS

The MMEDs obtained using convex feature points for range images of the translated and rotated phantom A were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], respectively, using the TOF camera. For the phantom B, the MMEDs of the convex and concave feature points were [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] mm, respectively, using the Kinect sensor. There was a statistically significant difference in the decreased MMED for convex feature points compared with concave feature points [Formula: see text].

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed framework has demonstrated the feasibility of differential geometry features for the detection of anatomical feature points on a patient surface in range image-guided radiation therapy.

Analysis of Geometric Shifts and Proper Setup-Margin in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Pelvic Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Using Endorectal Ballooning and Daily Enema for Prostate Immobilization

We evaluate geometric shifts of daily setup for evaluating the appropriateness of treatment and determining proper margins for the planning target volume (PTV) in prostate cancer patients.We analyzed 1200 sets of pretreatment megavoltage-CT scans that were acquired from 40 patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. They received whole pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). They underwent daily endorectal ballooning and enema to limit intrapelvic organ movement. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of daily translational shifts in right-to-left (X), anterior-to-posterior (Y), and superior-to-inferior (Z) were evaluated for systemic and random error.The mean ± SD of systemic error (Σ) in X, Y, Z, and roll was 2.21 ± 3.42 mm, -0.67 ± 2.27 mm, 1.05 ± 2.87 mm, and -0.43 ± 0.89°, respectively. The mean ± SD of random error (δ) was 1.95 ± 1.60 mm in X, 1.02 ± 0.50 mm in Y, 1.01 ± 0.48 mm in Z, and 0.37 ± 0.15° in roll. The calculated proper PTV margins that cover >95% of the target on average were 8.20 (X), 5.25 (Y), and 6.45 (Z) mm. Mean systemic geometrical shifts of IMRT were not statistically different in all transitional and three-dimensional shifts from early to late weeks. There was no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourianry toxicity.The whole pelvic IMRT technique is a feasible and effective modality that limits intrapelvic organ motion and reduces setup uncertainties. Proper margins for the PTV can be determined by using geometric shifts data.

Evaluation of serrated intraprostatic gold coils positional stability using on-board cone beam computed tomography scans acquired throughout the radiation treatment course

PURPOSE

To investigate intraprostatic gold coils positional stability analyzing intermarker distance in on-board cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans acquired throughout the entire treatment course.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 29 fiducial markers (FMs) were implanted in 10 patients through the transperineal approach, under ultrasound guidance. After 2 weeks from the FM implantation, all the patients underwent CT and magnetic resonance imaging under radiation therapy-planning conditions. The planning CT was the reference CT (CTref) used to calculate the initial intermarker distances. For every patient, 8 CBCTi (i varying from 1 to 8) acquired once a week during the treatment course were selected to calculate intermarker distances and compared with CTref. Reconstructed images of CBCTi were exported to the treatment planning system, and every FM was contoured. A point of interest at the center of mass of each contoured FM was created. The mean coordinates obtained for point of interest at the center of mass of FMs were used to calculate relative marker distances on CTref and CBCTi.

RESULTS

No patient developed postimplantation complications. A total of 224 marker distance variations (MDVs) were calculated for all 29 markers. The average directional variation of all MDVs (± standard deviation [SD]) was -0.14 ± 0.86 mm. The average absolute variations of all MDVs (± SD) were 0.71 ± 0.51 mm. The largest observed variation was 1.9 mm. All patients had not significant temporal trends in their marker distances. The SD of the MDVs was computed for each set of markers in all 10 patients. The SDs ranged between 0.4 and 1.1 mm in individual patients. The average of the mean SDs was 0.6 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The three-dimensional definition of each fiducial marker volume, using on-board CBCT, demonstrated the stability of FMs position throughout the entire radiation therapy treatment course.

Generation and verification of QFix kVue Calypso-compatible couch top model for a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator with FFF beams

This study details the generation, verification, and implementation of a treatment planning system (TPS) couch top model for patient support system used in conjunction with a dedicated stereotactic linear accelerator. Couch top model was created within the TPS using CT simulation images of the kVue Calpyso-compatible couchtop (with rails). Verification measurements were compared to TPS dose prediction for different energies (6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF) and rail configurations (rails in and rails out) using: 1) central axis point-dose measurements with pinpoint chamber in water-equivalent phantom at 42 gantry angles for various field sizes (2 × 2 cm², 4 × 4 cm², 10 × 10 cm²); and 2) Gafchromic EBT3 film parallel to beam in acrylic slab to assess changes in surface and percent depth doses in PA geometry. To assess sensitivity of delivered dose to variations in patient lateral position, measurements at central axis using the pinpoint chamber geometry were taken at lateral couch displacements of 2, 5, and 10 mm for 6 MV FFF. The maximum percent difference for point-dose measurements was 3.24% (6 MV FFF) and 2.30% (10 MV FFF). The average percent difference for point-dose measurements was less than 1.10% for all beam energies and rail geometries. The maximum percent difference between calculated and measured dose can be as large as 13.0% if no couch model is used for dose calculation. The presence of the couch structures also impacts surface dose and PDD, which was evaluated with Gafchromic film measurements. The upstream shift in the depth of dose maximum (dmax) was found to be 10.5 mm for 6 MV FFF and 5.5 mm for 10 MV FFF for 'Rails In' configuration. Transmission of the treatment beam through the couch results in an increase in surface dose (absolute percentage) of approximately 50% for both photon energies (6 MV FFF and 10MV FFF). The largest sensitivity to lateral shifts occurred at the lateral boundary of the rail structures. The mean magnitude (standard deviation) of the deviation between shifted and centered measurements over all field sizes tested was 0.61% (0.61%) for 2 mm shifts, 0.46% (0.67%) for 5 mm shifts, and 0.86% (1.46%) for 10 mm shifts.

Pelvic nodal dosing with registration to the prostate: implications for high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To determine whether image guidance with rigid registration (RR) to intraprostatic markers (IPMs) yields acceptable coverage of the pelvic lymph nodes in the context of a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) regimen.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Four to seven kilovoltage cone-beam CTs (CBCTs) from 12 patients with high-risk prostate cancer were analyzed, allowing approximation of an SBRT regimen. The nodal clinical target volume (CTV(N)) and bladder were contoured on all kilovoltage CBCTs. The V100 CTV(N), expressed as a ratio to the same parameter on the initial plan, and the magnitude of translational shift between RR to the IPMs versus RR to the pelvic bones, were computed. The ability of a multimodality bladder filling protocol to minimize bladder height variation was assessed in a separate cohort of 4 patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-five CBCTs were assessed. The average V100 CTV(N) was 92.6%, but for a subset of 3 patients the average was 80.0%, compared with 97.8% for the others (P<.0001). The average overall and superior-inferior axis magnitudes of the bony-to-fiducial translations were significantly larger in the subgroup with suboptimal nodal coverage (8.1 vs 3.9 mm and 5.8 vs 2.4 mm, respectively; P<.0001). Relative bladder height changes were also significantly larger in the subgroup with suboptimal nodal coverage (42.9% vs 18.5%; P<.05). Use of a multimodality bladder-filling protocol minimized bladder height variation (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

A majority of patients had acceptable nodal coverage after RR to IPMs, even when approximating SBRT. However, a subset of patients had suboptimal nodal coverage. These patients had large bony-to-fiducial translations and large variations in bladder height. Nodal coverage should be excellent if the superior-inferior axis bony-to-fiducial translation and the relative bladder height change (both easily measured on CBCT) are kept to a minimum. Implementation of a strict bladder filling protocol may achieve this goal.

Reconstruction of the treatment area by use of sinogram in helical tomotherapy

BACKGROUND

TomoTherapy (Accuray, USA) has an image-guided radiotherapy system with a megavoltage (MV) X-ray source and an on-board imaging device. This system allows one to acquire the delivery sinogram during the actual treatment, which partly includes information from the irradiated object. In this study, we try to develop image reconstruction during treatment with helical tomotherapy.

FINDINGS

Sinogram data were acquired during helical tomotherapy delivery using an arc-shaped detector array that consists of 576 xenon-gas filled detector cells. In preprocessing, these were normalized with full air-scan data. A software program was developed that reconstructs 3D images during treatment with corrections as; (1) the regions outside the field were masked not to be added in the backprojection (a masking correction), and (2) each voxel of the reconstructed image was divided by the number of the beamlets passing through its voxel (a ray-passing correction). The masking correction produced a reconstructed image, however, it contained streak artifacts. The ray-passing correction reduced this artifact. Although the SNR (the ratio of mean to standard deviation in a homogeneous region) and the contrast of the reconstructed image were slightly improved with the ray-passing correction, use of only the masking correction was sufficient for the visualization purpose.

CONCLUSIONS

The visualization of the treatment area was feasible by using the sinogram in helical tomotherapy. This proposed method would be useful in the treatment verification.

[Intraprostatic calcifications as natural fiducial markers in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer]

PURPOSE

To establish whether intraprostatic calcifications can serve as natural fiducials for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), replacing the implantation of intraprostatic fiducial markers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer, having intraprostatic calcifications visible on CT scan were selected and underwent intensity-modulated radiotherapy/3D conformal radiotherapy with IGRT in the department of radiotherapy of Henri-Mondor Hospital. All cone-beam computed tomographies (CBCT) were repositioned on intraprostatic calcifications. For each acquired image, displacements of intraprostatic calcifications were calculated with reference to position on planning CT in three directions: lateral, longitudinal and vertical.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2013, nine patients had 183 CBCT. For each image, three displacements and space coordinates were calculated using a single reference (intraprostatic calcification). Mean lateral, longitudinal and vertical movements were 0.26±5.7 mm, -1±4.6 mm and 0.42±3.5 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Studies exploring prostatic movements with fiducial markers as reference and ours with natural fiducials yield similar results. Our data confirm previous studies that have suggested that intraprostatic calcifications can be used as natural fiducials with potential reduction of iatrogenic risks and costs associated with the implantation of fiducial markers.

Assessing the Efficiency and Consistency of Daily Image-guided Radiation Therapy in a Modern Radiotherapy Centre

BACKGROUND

Patients at Radiation Oncology Queensland Toowoomba are treated using the assistance of daily image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Each patient's daily setup is exposed to a number of variables. This study investigates the effect that these variables have on the total time taken to analyse field placement and the total time taken for treatment, as well accessing setup error across a variety of treatment types.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 80 patients across a variety of treatment sites where daily IGRT was undertaken using kilovoltage and megavoltage orthogonal images. Variables investigated include the treatment type, the imaging modality used, and the setup error of each session. Statistical analysis was then performed on the data.

RESULTS

Patients being treated in the thoracic region had the greatest random setup error. The mean matching times were also longer for chest patients (197 seconds), whereas there were minimal differences in times regarding modality. Treatment times were longest for head and neck variables (399-405 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment daily IGRT is beneficial to all patients and can be performed efficiently. Pelvic variables were the strongest performer, with fiducial markers providing the most consistent and rapid match times. Chest variables were the worst performer specifically regarding random setup error and match times indicating future work required on chest stabilization.

Assessment of setup uncertainties for various tumor sites when using daily CBCT for more than 2200 VMAT treatments

The aim of this study was assess the patient setup errors for various tumor sites based on clinical data from a sufficient number of treatments with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using daily pretreatment CBCT imaging guidance. In addition, we calculated and compared the planning target volume (PTV) margins for all disease sites based on an analysis of specific systematic and random errors in our institution. All patients underwent pretreatment kV-CBCT imaging. The various tumor sites were divided into four categories; 21 brain (438 fractions), 35 head-and-neck tumors (H&N, 933 fractions), 19 thorax and abdomen tumors (T&A, 313 fractions), and 17 prostate cancer tumors (546 fractions). Overall distributions of setup corrections in all directions, frequencies of 3D vector lengths, institution-specific setup error, and PTV margins were analyzed. The longitudinal distribution for the T&A site represented an asymmetric offset in the negative direction. Rotational distributions were comparable for all treatment sites, and the prostate site had the narrowest distribution of ≤ ± 2°. The cumulative frequencies of 3D vector length of ≥ 7 mm were rare for brain lesions and H&N, but more common for T&A and prostate lesions at 25.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The overall mean error for all treatment sites were within ± 1 mm and ± 0.1°, with the exception of the T&A site, which had overall mean error of 2 mm in the negative longitudinal direction. The largest magnitude of systematic error and random error for the brain lesions and H&N was 1.4 mm in the translational directions, and 3.3 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. The PTV margins required in this analysis are ≤ 4 mm for the brain lesions and H&N in all translational directions, but ranged from 4 to 10 mm for T&A and prostate lesions. Analysis of each institution's specific setup errors using daily CBCT is essential for determining PTV margins and reducing setup uncertainties, because setup errors vary according to each immobilization system and patient.

Evaluation of techniques for slice sensitivity profile measurement and analysis

The purpose of this study was to compare the resulting full width at half maximum of slice sensitivity profiles (SSP) generated by several commercially available point response phantoms, and determine an appropriate imaging technique and analysis method. Four CT phantoms containing point response objects designed to produce a delta impulse signal used in this study: a Fluke CT-SSP phantom, a Gammex 464, a CatPhan 600, and a Kagaku Micro Disc phantom. Each phantom was imaged using 120 kVp, 325 mAs, head scan field of view, 32 × 0.625 mm helical scan with a 20 mm beam width and a pitch of 0.969. The acquired images were then reconstructed into all available slice thicknesses (0.625 mm - 5.0 mm). A computer program was developed to analyze the images of each dataset for generating a SSP from which the full width at half maximum (FWHM) was determined. Two methods for generating SSPs were evaluated and compared by choosing the mean vs. maximum value in the ROI, along with two methods for evaluating the FWHM of the SSP, linear interpolation and Gaussian curve fitting. FWHMs were compared with the manufacturer's specifications using percent error and z-test with a significance value of p < 0.05. The FWHMs from each phantom were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.089) with an average error of 3.5%. The FWHMs from SSPs generated from the mean value were statistically different (p ≤ 3.99 × 10¹³). The FWHMs from the different FWHM methods were not statistically different (p ≤ 0.499). Evaluation of the SSP is dependent on the ROI value used. The maximum value from the ROI should be used to generate the SSP whenever possible. SSP measurement is independent of the phantoms used in this study.

A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Reproducibility of different immobilization systems, which may affect set-up errors, remains uncertain. Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins and thus may result in undesirable treatment outcomes. This study compared the reproducibility of patient positioning with Hipfix system and whole body alpha cradle with respect to localized prostate cancer and investigated the existing CTV-PTV margins in the clinical oncology departments of two hospitals.

METHODS

Forty sets of data of patients with localized T1-T3 prostate cancer were randomly selected from two regional hospitals, with 20 patients immobilized by a whole-body alpha cradle system and 20 by a thermoplastic Hipfix system. Seven sets of the anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC) and medial-lateral (ML) deviations were collected from each patient. The reproducibility of patient positioning within the two hospitals was compared using a total vector error (TVE) parameter. In addition, CTV-PTV margins were computed using van Herk's formula. The resulting values were compared to the current CTV-PTV margins in both hospitals.

RESULTS

The TVE values were 5.1 and 2.8 mm for the Hipfix and the whole-body alpha cradle systems respectively. TVE associated with the whole-body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly less than the Hipfix system (p < 0.05). The CC axis in the Hipfix system attained the highest frequency of large (23.6%) and serious (7.9%) set-up errors. The calculated CTV to PTV margin was 8.3, 1.9 and 2.3 mm for the Hipfix system, and 2.1, 3.4 and 1.8 mm for the whole body alpha cradle in CC, ML and AP axes respectively. All but one (CC axis using Hipfix) margin calculated did not exceed the corresponding hospital protocol. The whole body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly better than the Hipfix system in terms of reproducibility (p < 0.05), especially in the CC axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole body alpha cradle system was more reproducible than the Hipfix system. In particular, the difference in CC axis contributed most to the results and the current CC margin for the Hipfix system might be considered as inadequate.

Field Placement Correction Using MV IGRT. Is Postintervention Imaging Necessary?

PURPOSE

Online image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is used for all radical pelvic patients at Radiation Oncology Queensland. One linear accelerator is equipped with megavoltage electronic portal imaging. Daily imaging on this linear accelerator introduces a dose burden that must be accounted for in the planning process. This dose burden is further complicated by postintervention images taken to verify field placement corrections. Analysis of setup errors and number and management of isocenter shifts was also used to identify an appropriate dose burden to be applied.

METHOD

The IGRT data of 50 radical pelvic patients were retrospectively collected and analysed, and the number of isocenter moves made was assessed. Statistical analysis of systematic and random errors, both preintervention and postintervention, was undertaken. Inclusive in this analysis was the number of times postintervention images revealed an error in manually entered isocenter shifts. The imaging dose used was also investigated.

RESULTS

Online IGRT was able to reduce the setup error to <2 mm for all orthogonal planes. Postintervention imaging was shown to be necessary to assess field placement, because manual errors in field placement were found to occur. The generic dose burden in use was found to be excessive.

CONCLUSION

Daily IGRT is now considered an essential tool in modern radiation therapy. Postintervention imaging is required to ensure correct isocenter placement on linear accelerators where the process is manual. The current estimate of the worst-case scenario dose burden may be reduced to either incorporate a "population" dose or a more realistic absolute maximum dose. Any removal of a quality assurance process such as this requires evidence, consultation, and careful consideration.

Electronic portal imaging vs kilovoltage imaging in fiducial marker image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer: an analysis of set-up uncertainties

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to compare interfraction prostate displacement data between electronic portal imaging (EPI) and kilovoltage imaging (KVI) treatment units and discuss the impact of any difference on margin calculations for prostate cancer image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT).

METHODS

Prostate interfraction displacement data was collected prospectively for the first 4 fractions in 333 patients treated with IGRT with daily pre-treatment EPI or KVI orthogonal imaging. Displacement was recorded in the anteroposterior (AP), left-right (LR) and superoinferior (SI) directions. The proportion of displacement <3 mm and the difference in median absolute displacements were calculated in all directions.

RESULTS

1088 image pairs were analysed in total, 448 by EPI and 640 by KVI. There were 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18-28%) more displacements under 3 mm for EPI than for KVI in the AP direction, 14% (95% CI 10-19%) more in the LR direction and 10% (95% CI 5-15%) more in the SI direction. The differences in absolute median displacement (KVI>EPI) were AP 1 mm, LR 1 mm and SI 0.5 mm. Wilcoxon rank-sum test showed that distributions were significantly different for all three dimensions (p<0.0001 for AP and LR and p=0.02 for SI).

CONCLUSION

EPI has a statistically significant smaller set-up error distribution than KVI. We would expect that, because fiducial marker imaging is less clear for EPI, the clinical target volume to planning target volume margin would be greater when using IGRT; however, relying wholly on displacement data gives the opposite result. We postulate that this is owing to observer bias, which is not accounted for in margin calculation formulas.

Assessment of the dosimetric consequences of prostate movement through rectal distension for patients receiving 3DCRT

Purpose: To investigate the dosimetric consequences of rectal distension at the time of the planning computed tomography (CT) scan and any resultant prostate movement on the planned dose delivery for patients receiving three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) to the prostate.

Methods and materials: 25 prostate cancer patients whose planning CT scan demonstrated a full rectum were rescanned after following a laxative protocol. Rectal dimensions on the two scans and 3DCRT treatment plans produced on each plan were compared. The dosimetric implications of changes in rectal size on the treatment plans and the delivered dose were determined. Statistical significance was evaluated with the Wilcoxon signed ranks test.

Results: Significant differences in rectal size were found between the initial CT scan and the rescan. The corresponding median change in prostate position was 4.7 mm. The use of planning scans with a full rectum, that is unrepresentative of the rectum, during treatment causes significant reductions in planning target volume (PTV) minimum dose (median reduction 33.7%) and coverage by the 95% isodose (median reduction 3.7% of the PTV).

Conclusion: Rectal distension on the initial planning scan can lead to significant PTV underdosage. Patients presenting with large initial rectal fillings must be rescanned in order to avoid a systematic underdosing of the PTV.

Efficacy of fiducial marker-based image-guided radiation therapy in prostate tomotherapy and potential dose coverage improvement using a patient positioning optimization method

PURPOSE

To evaluate the dose coverage efficacy of fiducial marker-based prostate tomotherapy and a positioning correction optimization technique for the improvement of suboptimal dose distributions.

METHODS

Three gold fiducial markers were implanted in prostate glands for patients who were to receive prostate tomotherapy. TomoTherapy megavoltage computed tomographies (MVCTs; TomoTherapy, Madison, WI) were routinely acquired at treatment and were registered to corresponding planning CTs based on the markers to correct for interfractional positioning deviations using translational table movements. The prostate glands and seminal vesicles were delineated on the MVCTs acquired for 10 patients at different treatment fractions and the treatment dose coverage was computed with the marker-based correction taken into account. The treatment dose coverage was compared with the corresponding plan to evaluate the efficacy of the marker-based image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) approach. Separately, a hill-climbing optimization algorithm was used to optimize the positioning by maximizing a dose-based objective function. During the optimization, the dose was constantly recomputed with the translational correction until an optimized dose coverage was reached. This optimized dose coverage was compared with the marker-based dose coverage to evaluate dosimetric improvement for treatments in which suboptimal dose distributions were observed after the marker-based corrections.

RESULTS

Suboptimal dose coverage of prostate glands and seminal vesicles were observed in about 8 and 6 of a total 75 fractions, respectively, after the marker-based IGRT positioning corrections. Six of the 10 patients experienced 1 or more factions of suboptimal prostate gland coverage and 2 of the 10 patients experienced 1 or more fractions of suboptimal seminal vesicle dose coverage. Utilization of the proposed positioning correction optimization method led to satisfactory dose coverage of both prostate glands and seminal vesicles for all 10 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the planning target volume margin size specified in the current study, the fiducial marker-based IGRT approach may not be completely adequate to achieve desired dose coverage of the target volumes at every fraction. Due to relatively poor image quality of MVCTs, additional investigations may be required to confirm the finding. The proposed positioning correction optimization method is shown to effectively improve the observed suboptimal dose coverage of the target volumes.

Impact of the frequency of online verifications on the patient set-up accuracy and set-up margins

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the patient set-up error of different anatomical sites, to estimate the effect of different frequencies of online verifications on the patient set-up accuracy, and to calculate margins to accommodate for the patient set-up error (ICRU set-up margin, SM).

Methods and materials

Alignment data of 148 patients treated with inversed planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) of the head and neck (n = 31), chest (n = 72), abdomen (n = 15), and pelvis (n = 30) were evaluated. The patient set-up accuracy was assessed using orthogonal megavoltage electronic portal images of 2328 fractions of 173 planning target volumes (PTV). In 25 patients, two PTVs were analyzed where the PTVs were located in different anatomical sites and treated in two different radiotherapy courses. The patient set-up error and the corresponding SM were retrospectively determined assuming no online verification, online verification once a week and online verification every other day.

Results

The SM could be effectively reduced with increasing frequency of online verifications. However, a significant frequency of relevant set-up errors remained even after online verification every other day. For example, residual set-up errors larger than 5 mm were observed on average in 18% to 27% of all fractions of patients treated in the chest, abdomen and pelvis, and in 10% of fractions of patients treated in the head and neck after online verification every other day.

Conclusion

In patients where high set-up accuracy is desired, daily online verification is highly recommended.

Role of intra- or periprostatic calcifications in image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) allows more precise localization of the prostate, thus minimizing errors resulting from organ motion and set-up during treatment of prostate cancer. Using megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography (MVCBCT), references such as bones, the prostate itself or implanted fiducial markers can be used as surrogates to correct patient positioning immediately before each treatment fraction. However, the use of fiducials requires an invasive procedure and may increase costs. We aimed to assess whether intra- or periprostatic calcifications (IPC) could be used as natural fiducials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data on patients treated with IGRT for prostate cancer with clearly visible IPC and implanted fiducials in both planning CT and MVCBCT images were reviewed. IPC were classified as central when inside the prostate and peripheral when within the planning target volume. Daily deviations in lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions from baseline positioning using fiducials and using IPC were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 287 MVCBCT images were obtained and analyzed from 10 patients. The mean ± standard deviation daily deviation (mm) in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical coordinates were 0.55 ± 3.11, 0.58 ± 3.45, and -0.54 ± 4.03, respectively, for fiducials, and 0.72 ± 3.22, 0.63 ± 3.58, and -0.69 ± 4.26, for IPC. The p values for comparisons (fiducials vs. IPC) were 0.003, 0.653, and 0.078 for lateral, longitudinal, and vertical coordinates, respectively. When cases with central IPC were analyzed (n = 7), no significant difference was found in such comparisons. Central IPC and fiducials exhibited a similar pattern of displacement during treatment, with equal values for daily displacements in the three directions for more than 90% of measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that centrally located IPC may be used as natural fiducials for treatment positioning during IGRT for prostate cancer, with potential reductions in the risks and costs associated with fiducial implantation.

Comparison of daily prostate positions during conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer using an integrated CT-linear accelerator system: in-room CT image versus digitally reconstructed radiograph

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to quantify the magnitudes of the position shifts of internal structures together with the correlation between the day-to-day positioning of the prostate and the bony anatomy using an integrated CT-linear accelerator system for external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1176 pretreatment in-room CT images and their digitally reconstructed radio-graph (DRR) pairs from 33 patients were acquired over the course of the study. The differences between the isocenter of the prostate on in-room CT and the isocenter of the bony anatomy on DRR were analyzed. The agreement between positions in each direction was compared using Bland-Altman limits of agreement.

RESULTS

The 95% limits of agreement in lateral (LR), superoinferior (SI), and anteroposterior (AP) directions were -2.98 to 2.49 mm, -4.69 to 5.75 mm, and -8.23 to 7.30 mm, respectively. The isocenter was localized to within 3.0 mm on in-room CT images and DRR 99.0% in LR, 85.1% in SI, and 85.9% in AP.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable differences between in-room CT images and DRR exist. These data demonstrate that there is a significantly greater shift in the SI and AP directions than in the lateral direction for the entire patient group. Applications such as our image guide system will, with routine clinical use, continue to improve the precision of external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer comparing kV imaging of fiducial markers with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

PURPOSE

To present our single-institution experience with image-guided radiotherapy comparing fiducial markers and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) for daily localization of prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 2007 to October 2008, 36 patients with prostate cancer received intensity-modulated radiotherapy with daily localization by use of implanted fiducials. Orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) portal imaging preceded all 1244 treatments. Cone-beam computed tomography images were also obtained before 286 treatments (23%). Shifts in the anterior-posterior (AP), superior-inferior (SI), and left-right (LR) dimensions were made from kV fiducial imaging. Cone-beam computed tomography shifts based on soft tissues were recorded. Shifts were compared by use of Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Mean and standard deviation of absolute differences were also compared. A difference of 5 mm or less was acceptable. Subsets including start date, body mass index, and prostate size were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 286 treatments, 81 (28%) resulted in a greater than 5.0-mm difference in one or more dimensions. Mean differences in the AP, SI, and LR dimensions were 3.4 ± 2.6 mm, 3.1 ± 2.7 mm, and 1.3 ± 1.6 mm, respectively. Most deviations occurred in the posterior (fiducials, 78%; CBCT, 59%), superior (79%, 61%), and left (57%, 63%) directions. Bland-Altman 95% confidence intervals were -4.0 to 9.3 mm for AP, -9.0 to 5.3 mm for SI, and -4.1 to 3.9 mm for LR. The percentages of shift agreements within ±5 mm were 72.4% for AP, 72.7% for SI, and 97.2% for LR. Correlation between imaging techniques was not altered by time, body mass index, or prostate size.

CONCLUSIONS

Cone-beam computed tomography and kV fiducial imaging are similar; however, more than one-fourth of CBCT and kV shifts differed enough to affect target coverage. This was even more pronounced with smaller margins (3 mm). Fiducial imaging requires less daily physician input, is less time-consuming, and is our preferred method for prostate image-guided radiotherapy.

Acurácia na reprodutibilidade do posicionamento diário de pacientes submetidos a radioterapia conformada (RT3D) para câncer de próstata

OBJETIVO: Avaliar a reprodutibilidade do posicionamento de pacientes com diagnóstico de câncer de próstata submetidos a radioterapia conformada. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 960 (posições anterior e lateral) filmes radiológicos, de um total de 120 pacientes que receberam radioterapia conformada na próstata com técnica isocêntrica. As imagens foram obtidas em acelerador linear de partículas 6 MV. Aplicou-se protocolo específico para planejamento e tratamento da próstata, com o paciente em posição supina, mãos colocadas sobre o tórax, pés apoiados em suporte apropriado. Diariamente, os pacientes foram posicionados conforme demarcações na pele, coincidentes com os lasers da sala. Os filmes radiológicos foram comparados com as radiografias reconstruídas digitalmente (digitally reconstructed radiography - DRR) em sistema de planejamento computadorizado Eclipse, a partir das tomografias. As radiografias de posicionamento foram realizadas no primeiro dia e após, semanalmente, até o término do tratamento. RESULTADOS: As médias dos deslocamentos observados foram de 1,99 ± 1,25 mm no sentido crânio-caudal, 1,37 ± 0,84 mm no látero-lateral e 1,94 ± 1,10 mm no ântero-posterior. CONCLUSÃO: O uso de protocolos específicos para posicionamento dos pacientes é possível na prática clínica, possibilita reprodutibilidade adequada e rápida correção dos possíveis erros.

A pseudoinverse deformation vector field generator and its applications

PURPOSE

To present, implement, and test a self-consistent pseudoinverse displacement vector field (PIDVF) generator, which preserves the location of information mapped back-and-forth between image sets.

METHODS

The algorithm is an iterative scheme based on nearest neighbor interpolation and a subsequent iterative search. Performance of the algorithm is benchmarked using a lung 4DCT data set with six CT images from different breathing phases and eight CT images for a single prostrate patient acquired on different days. A diffeomorphic deformable image registration is used to validate our PIDVFs. Additionally, the PIDVF is used to measure the self-consistency of two nondiffeomorphic algorithms which do not use a self-consistency constraint: The ITK Demons algorithm for the lung patient images and an in-house B-Spline algorithm for the prostate patient images. Both Demons and B-Spline have been QAed through contour comparison. Self-consistency is determined by using a DIR to generate a displacement vector field (DVF) between reference image R and study image S (DVF(R-S)). The same DIR is used to generate DVF(S-R). Additionally, our PIDVF generator is used to create PIDVF(S-R). Back-and-forth mapping of a set of points (used as surrogates of contours) using DVF(R-S) and DVF(S-R) is compared to back-and-forth mapping performed with DVF(R-S) and PIDVF(S-R). The Euclidean distances between the original unmapped points and the mapped points are used as a self-consistency measure.

RESULTS

Test results demonstrate that the consistency error observed in back-and-forth mappings can be reduced two to nine times in point mapping and 1.5 to three times in dose mapping when the PIDVF is used in place of the B-Spline algorithm. These self-consistency improvements are not affected by the exchanging of R and S. It is also demonstrated that differences between DVF(S-R) and PIDVF(S-R) can be used as a criteria to check the quality of the DVF.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of DVF and its PIDVF will improve the self-consistency of points, contour, and dose mappings in image guided adaptive therapy.

The effect of interfraction prostate motion on IMRT plans: a dose-volume histogram analysis using a Gaussian error function model

The Gaussian error function model, containing pairs of error and complementary error functions, was used to carry out cumulative dose-volume histogram (cDVH) analysis on prostate intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans with interfraction prostate motion. Cumulative DVHs for clinical target volumes (CTVs) shifted in the anterior-posterior directions based on a 7-beam IMRT plan were calculated and modeled using the Pinnacle3 treatment planning system and a Gaussian error function, respectively. As the parameters in the error function model, namely, a, b and c were related to the shape of the cDVH curve, evaluation of cDVHs corresponding to the prostate motion based on the model parameters becomes possible as demonstrated in this study. It was found that deviations of the cDVH for the CTV were significant, when the CTV-planning target volume (PTV) margin was underestimated in the anterior-posterior directions, particularly in the posterior direction for a patient with relatively small prostate volume (39 cm3). Analysis of the cDVH for the CTV shifting in the anterior-posterior directions using the error function model showed that parameters a1,2, which were related to the maximum relative volume of the cDVH, changed symmetrically when the prostate was shifted in the anterior and posterior directions. This change was more significant for the larger prostate. For parameters b related to the slope of the cDVH, b1,2 changed symmetrically from the isocenter, when the CTV was within the PTV. This was different from parameters c (c1,2 are related to the maximum dose of the cDVH), which did not vary significantly with the prostate motion in the anterior-posterior directions and prostate volume. Using the patient data, this analysis validates the error function model, and further verified the clinical application of this mathematical model on treatment plan evaluations.

Assessing prostate, bladder and rectal doses during image guided radiation therapy--need for plan adaptation?

The primary application of Image‐Guided Radiotherapy (IGRT) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer has been to assist precise dose delivery to the tumor. With the ability to use in‐room Computed Tomography (CT) imaging modalities, the prostate, bladder and rectum can be imaged before each treatment and the actual doses delivered to these organs can be tracked using anatomy of the day. This study evaluates the dosimetric uncertainties caused by interfraction organ variation during IGRT for 10 patients using kilovoltage cone beam CT (kvCBCT) on the Elekta Synergy system and megavoltage CT (MVCT) on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art System. The actual delivered doses to the prostate, bladder and rectum were based on dose recomputation using CT anatomy of the day. The feasibility of dose calculation accuracy in kvCBCT images from the Elekta Synergy system was investigated using the ComTom phantom. Additionally, low contrast resolution, image uniformity, and spatial resolution between the three imaging modalities of kilovoltage CT (kvCT), kvCBCT and MVCT images, were quantitatively evaluated using the Catphan 600 phantom. The Planned Adaptive software was used on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art system to construct a cumulative Dose Volume Histogram (DVH), incorporating anatomical information provided by the daily MVCT scans. The cumulative DVH was examined to identify large deviation (10% or greater) between the planned and delivered mean doses. The study proposes a framework that applies the cumulative DVH to evaluate and adapt plans that are based on actual delivered doses. Due to the large deviation in CT number (›300 HU) between the kvCBCT images and the kvCT, a direct dose recomputation on the kvCBCT images from the Elekta Synergy system was found to be inaccurate. The maximum deviation to the prostate was only 2.7% in our kvCBCT study, when compared to the daily prescribed dose. However, there was a large daily variation in rectum and bladder doses based on the anatomy of the day. The maximum variation in rectum and bladder volumes receiving the percentage of prescribed dose was 12% and 40%, respectively. We have shown that by using Planned Adaptive software on the TomoTherapy Hi·Art system, plans can be adapted based on the image feedback from daily MVCT scans to allow the actual delivered doses to closely track the original planned doses.

PACS number: 87.53.Tf

Clinical experience with image-guided radiotherapy in an accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy protocol

PURPOSE

To explore the feasibility of fiducial markers for the use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in an accelerated partial breast intensity modulated radiotherapy protocol.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Nineteen patients consented to an institutional review board approved protocol of accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducial marker placement and treatment with IGRT. Patients (1 patient with bilateral breast cancer; 20 total breasts) underwent ultrasound guided implantation of three 1.2- x 3-mm gold markers placed around the surgical cavity. For each patient, table shifts (inferior/superior, right/left lateral, and anterior/posterior) and minimum, maximum, mean error with standard deviation were recorded for each of the 10 BID treatments. The dose contribution of daily orthogonal films was also examined.

RESULTS

All IGRT patients underwent successful marker placement. In all, 200 IGRT treatment sessions were performed. The average vector displacement was 4 mm (range, 2-7 mm). The average superior/inferior shift was 2 mm (range, 0-5 mm), the average lateral shift was 2 mm (range, 1-4 mm), and the average anterior/posterior shift was 3 mm (range, 1 5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the use of IGRT can be successfully used in an accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy protocol. The authors believe that this technique has increased daily treatment accuracy and permitted reduction in the margin added to the clinical target volume to form the planning target volume.

Potential for higher treatment failure in obese patients: correlation of elevated body mass index and increased daily prostate deviations from the radiation beam isocenters in an analysis of 1,465 computed tomographic images

PURPOSE

Recent clinical outcome studies on prostate cancer have reported the influence of patient's obesity on the biochemical failure rates after various treatment modalities. In this study, we investigated the effect of patient's physical characteristics on prostate shift in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and hypothesized that there maybe a correlation between patient physique and tumor shift.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was performed using data for 117 patients who received image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for prostate cancer between January 2005 and April 2007. A total of 1,465 CT scans were analyzed. The standard deviations (SDs) of prostate shifts for all patients, along with patient weight, body mass index (BMI), and subcutaneous adipose-tissue thickness (SAT), were determined. Spearman rank correlation analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients, 26.5% were considered normal weight, 48.7% were overweight, 17.9% were mildly obese, and 6.9% were moderately to severely obese. Notably 1.3%, 1.5%, 2.0%, and 21.2% of the respective shifts were greater than 10 mm in the left-right (LR) direction for the four patient groups, whereas in the anterior-posterior direction the shifts are 18.2%, 12.6%, 6.7%, and 21.0%, respectively. Strong correlations were observed between SAT, BMI, patient weight, and SDs of daily shifts in the LR direction (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The strong correlation between obesity and shift indicates that without image-guided radiation therapy, the target volume (prostate with or without seminal vesicles) may not receive the intended dose for patients who are moderate to severely obese. This may explain the higher recurrence rate with conventional external beam radiation therapy.

Calcifications are potential surrogates for prostate localization in image-guided radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of using calcifications as surrogates for the prostate position during cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image-guided radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The twice-weekly CBCT images taken during the treatment course of 4 patients were retrospectively studied for the stability of the calcifications. The geometric center of three fiducial markers was used as the reference. The planning CT images of 131 prostate patients recently treated with external beam radiotherapy at our center were reviewed to estimate the calcification occurrence rate. Analysis was conducted using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system. Two patients were treated using prostate calcifications as the landmark in on-line registration. Both the Varian standard and the low-dose CBCT modes were used for imaging.

RESULTS

The calcifications were found to be stable during the treatment course. At the 95% confidence interval, the difference between the distance from an identified calcification to the fiducial markers on CBCT and the distance on the planning CT scans was 0.2 +/- 2.0 mm, 0.8 +/- 2.2 mm, and 0.4 +/- 2.4 mm in the left-right, anteroposterior, and superoinferior direction, respectively. Of the 131 patients, 46 (35%) had well-defined calcifications either inside the prostate or near the borders. Our experience in treating the first 2 patients demonstrated that the calcifications are easily distinguished on low-dose scans and that calcification registration can be precisely performed.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study have shown that calcifications can be reliable markers of prostate position and allow for precise image guidance with a low-imaging dose. With this approach, potentially about one-third of prostate patients could benefit from precise image guidance without the invasive use of markers.

Off-line setup corrections only marginally reduce the number of on-line corrections for prostate radiotherapy using implanted gold markers

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency of combining on-line and off-line corrections for the positioning of patients receiving external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Daily portal images were acquired during the treatment of 102 patients to verify and correct the position of the prostatic gland using implanted gold markers. In addition to an existing off-line procedure, on-line corrections were applied in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction only, to limit the increase in daily workload. The possible increase in workload of the combined correction procedure for on-line corrections in either two or three directions was further investigated by simulating the required position corrections for 500 treatments.

RESULTS

The combined correction procedure in AP-direction resulted in a systematic dispersion and random variation of 0.3mm (1 SD) and 1.0mm (1 SD), respectively. Application of off-line corrections during pre-treatment setup reduced the number of required on-line corrections from 22+/-4 (1 SD) to 17+/-4 (1 SD), at the cost of 1.4+/-1.0 (1 SD) off-line corrections. For on-line corrections in two or three directions, application of a combined on-line/off-line procedure did not noticeably reduce the number of setup corrections.

CONCLUSIONS

The on-line procedure is feasible and significantly improves both systematic and random errors to below 1 mm with a limited impact on the workload and treatment time. The application of off-line setup corrections during pre-treatment patient positioning only marginally reduces the number of on-line setup corrections.