Long-term outcome of combined modality therapy in retroperitoneal and deep-trunk soft-tissue sarcoma: analysis of prognostic factors

Comparative In Silico Analysis of Ultra-Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) in the Pre-Operative Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

While pre-operative radiation did not improve abdominal recurrence-free survival for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the randomized STRASS trial, it did reduce rates of local recurrence. However, the risk of toxicity was substantial and the time to surgery was prolonged. A combination of hypofractionation and proton therapy may reduce delays from the initiation of radiation to surgery and limit the dose to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). We conducted a dosimetric comparison of the pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton radiotherapy (IMPT).

METHODS

Pre-operative IMRT and IMPT plans were generated on 10 RPS patients. The prescription was 25 Gy radiobiological equivalents (GyEs) (radiobiological effective dose of 1.1) to the clinical target volume and 30 GyEs to the margin at risk, all in five fractions. Comparisons were made using student T-tests.

RESULTS

The following endpoints were significantly lower with IMPT than with IMRT: mean doses to liver, bone, and all genitourinary and gastrointestinal OARs; bowel, kidney, and bone V5-V20; stomach V15; liver V5; maximum doses to stomach, spinal canal, and body; and whole-body integral dose.

CONCLUSIONS

IMPT maintained target coverage while significantly reducing the dose to adjacent OARs and integral dose compared to IMRT. A prospective trial treating RPS with pre-operative ultra-hypofractionated IMPT at our institution is currently being pursued.

Myxofibrosarcoma of the abdominal wall : A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS) is a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma characterized by diffuse infiltration patterns. Myxofibrosarcoma arises often in extremities. Its occurrence in the abdominal wall is extremely rare. Herein, we present here a case of high-grade MFS of the abdominal wall discovered in a 58-year-old woman complaining of an abdominal mass.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

This report illustrates the case of a female who presented a mass in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a well-circumcised, heterogeneous soft tissue mass. We performed a wide margin excision of the mass. Histology concluded in myxofibrosarcoma of the abdominal wall. Adjuvant radiotherapy was performed.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

We reported successful surgical treatment for myxofibrosarcoma of the abdominal wall. To our knowledge, this is the second report in English literature. MFS is a subtype of soft tissue sarcoma with a locally infiltrative behavior. To ensure the best curative treatment, It is important to excise the tumor with wide margins. Knowing that MFS has a propensity for local recurrence (16 to 57 %), adjuvant radiotherapy has emerged as an efficient treatment for improving local control. The role of chemotherapy is controversial and has not shown effects on survival.

CONCLUSION

Myxofibrosarcoma is a connective tissue neoplasm. Its occurrence in the abdominal wall is extremely rare. Surgical treatment with large negative margins is the cornerstone of the treatment. Adjuvant radiotherapy is essential in preventing local recurrences.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for soft-tissue sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Growing data supports the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Brachytherapy has been used for decades in the management of STS and can be utilized as monotherapy or as a boost to external beam radiation. We present updated guidelines from the American Brachytherapy Society regarding the utilization of brachytherapy in the management of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in STS and STS brachytherapy created an updated clinical practice guideline including step-by-step details for performing STS brachytherapy based on a literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy monotherapy should be considered for lower-recurrence risk patients or after a local recurrence following previous external beam radiation; a brachytherapy boost can be considered in higher-risk patents meeting implant criteria. Multiple dose/fractionation regimens are available, with determination based on tumor location and treatment intent. Techniques to limit wound complications are based on the type of wound closure; wound complication can be mitigated with a delay in the start of brachytherapy with immediate wound closure or by utilizing a staged reconstruction technique, which allows an earlier treatment start with a delayed wound closure.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated guidelines provide clinicians with data on indications for STS brachytherapy as well as guidelines on how to perform and deliver high quality STS brachytherapy safely with minimal toxicity.

Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas: Radiotherapy experience from a tertiary cancer center and review of current evidence

Background

Surgery remains to be the main therapeutic approach for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) although evidence supports that complementary radiotherapy increases local-control and survival. We present a multidisciplinary management and experience of a tertiary cancer center in the treatment of RPS and analyze current evidence of radiotherapy efficacy.

Patients and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients with primary or relapsed RPS treated between November 2009 and October 2018. Multidisciplinary approach comprised complete resection in 15 patients (79%) achieving resection R0 in 11 patients (58%), R1 in 4 patients (21%) and R2 in 2 patients (10%). Seven patients (37%) underwent a preoperative radiation (PRORT), 10 patients (53%), post-operative radiation (PORT) and 2 patients (10%), received radiotherapy exclusively. Ten patients (53%) received adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

With a median follow-up of 24 months (2-114 months), actuarial rates of loco-regional relapse free survival (LRFS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 77%, 77% and 67%, respectively. Actuarial rates of distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1, 2 and 3 years were 100%, 100% and 80% for DMFS; 94%, 77% and 67% for DFS and 100%, 91% and 91% for OS, respectively. Only surgical margins (negative vs. positive) showed significance for 3y-LRFS: 100% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.018. Treatment tolerance was acceptable with no acute or late toxicity higher than grade 2.

Conclusions

Complementary radiotherapy appears to be useful and well tolerated for the multidisciplinary management of RPS. Presence of positive surgical margins seems to be the most relevant prognostic factor through the follow-up.

Analysis of outcomes and predictors of long-term survival following resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) include a heterogeneous group of rare malignant tumours, and various treatment algorithms are still controversially discussed until today. The present study aimed to examine postoperative and long-term outcomes after resection of primary RPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data of patients who underwent resection of primary RPS between 2005 and 2015 were assessed, and predictors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were identified.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients underwent resection for primary RPS. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 31 and 3%, respectively. After a median follow-up time of 74 months, 5-year OS and DFS rates were 58 and 34%, respectively. Histologic high grade (5-year OS: G1: 92% vs. G2: 54% vs. G3: 43%, P = 0.030) was significantly associated with diminished OS in univariate and multivariate analyses. When assessing DFS, histologic high grade (5-year DFS: G1: 63% vs. G2: 24% vs. G3: 22%, P = 0.013), positive surgical resection margins (5-year DFS: R0: 53% vs. R1: 10% vs. R2: 0%, P = 0.014), and vascular involvement (5-year DFS: yes: 33% vs no: 39%, P = 0.001), were significantly associated with inferior DFS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade tumours indicated poor OS, while vascular involvement, positive surgical resection margins, and histologic grade are the most important predictors of DFS. Although multimodal treatment strategies are progressively established, surgical resection remains the mainstay in the majority of patients with RPS, even in cases with vascular involvement.

Carbon ion radiotherapy for unresectable localized axial soft tissue sarcoma

Carbon ion radiotherapy is known for its high‐precision dose distribution and high biological effectiveness. We evaluated the results of carbon ion radiotherapy in 128 patients with unresectable localized axial soft tissue sarcoma at a single institution. The patients’ median age was 54 years, and the median follow‐up period was 49.4 (range 6.4‐146.4) months. The median tumor volume was 356 cm³. The 5‐year local control, overall survival, and disease‐free survival rates were 65%, 46%, and 39%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor volume, local control, and incidences of metastases were significantly related to overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, tumor volume and local control were significantly related to overall survival. We did not find any factors related to local control. Five patients required surgical intervention because of adverse events in the bones. Carbon ion radiotherapy may be a treatment option for unresectable axial soft tissue sarcoma.

Feasibility of using stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable soft tissue tumors of the trunk

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable soft tissue tumors of the trunk.

Materials and Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2008, 23 patients with 36 lesions of soft tissue tumors, which were located in the trunk and not suitable for resection, underwent SBRT. Among the 36 lesions, 31 were malignant and 5 were benign. The median tumor volume was 24 cm³ (range, 2.6–213 cm₃). SBRT doses ranged from 20 to 48 Gy in 1–5 fractions.

Results

With a median follow-up of 73 months, the overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) rates at 5 years were 39% and 52%, respectively. For malignant tumors, the OS and LC rates at 5 years were 28% and 47%, respectively. For benign tumors, the OS and LC rates at 5 years were 80% and 100%, respectively. There was no acute toxicity of grade ≥3. One case of grade 3 late skin toxicity was reported 10 months after SBRT.

Conclusion

SBRT may be an effective and safe treatment modality for the local control of unresectable soft tissue tumors of the trunk including tumors of a benign nature.

High-grade myxofibrosarcoma of the abdominal wall

The authors present a case of a 57-year-old man, who presented to the surgical clinic with a mass in the suprapubic region. A CT scan revealed a well-circumscribed lobular, heterogeneous soft tissue mass measuring 12×8.6×7.8 cm. The final histopathological diagnosis from the resection of the lesion was a myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), grade 3. The management of MFS includes surgical and oncological options which are reviewed here. These are aimed at complete excision and reducing the risk of local occurrence.

Looking for answers: the current status of neoadjuvant treatment in localized soft tissue sarcomas

PURPOSE

Sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous variant of cancer. The standard of care treatment involves surgical resection with radiation in high-risk patients. Despite appropriate treatment approximately 50 % of patients will suffer and die from recurrent disease. The purpose of this article is to review the current evidence concerning the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation in soft tissue sarcomas.

METHODS

An in-depth literature search was conducted using Ovid Medline and PubMed.

RESULTS

The most active chemotherapeutic agents in sarcoma are anthracyclines and ifosfamide. Adjuvant chemotherapy trials show only minimal benefit. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers the potential advantage of reducing the extent of surgery, increasing the limb salvage rate, early exposure of micrometastatic disease to chemotherapy, and assessment of tumor response to chemotherapy. Some retrospective and phase II trials suggest a benefit to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Unfortunately, no clearly positive phase III prospectively randomized trials exist for neoadjuvant therapy in soft tissue sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

The current neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials that do exist are heterogeneous resulting in conflicting results. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation can be considered in patients with high-risk disease in an attempt to improve long-term outcomes.

Predictors of improved survival for patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare tumors that can be locally aggressive with high rates of recurrence. Given that data on survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas are conflicting, we sought to use a nationwide cancer database to identify factors associated with survival in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas.

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was utilized to identify patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas from 2002 to 2012. Univariable and multivariable survival analysis was performed using a generalized gamma parametric survival function.

RESULTS

A total of 2,920 patients were included; overall 5- and 10-year survivals were 58.4% and 45.3%, respectively. On multivariable survival analysis, age, histologic type, grade, size, local extension, lymph node, and distant metastasis were associated with decreased survival (all P < .05). Patients undergoing operative resection survived 2.5 times longer (95% confidence interval: 2.0-3.0, P < .001) and those receiving radiation therapy 1.3 times longer (95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.6, P = .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

During the past decade, retroperitoneal sarcoma patients treated with radiation demonstrate longer survival compared with patients who did not receive radiation. Further study is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms that underlie the radiation-related survival benefit observed in this study.

Metastasis in dedifferentiated liposarcoma: Predictors and outcome in 148 patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pattern of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) metastases and to analyze their predictors and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we reviewed the imaging and clinical records of all consenting patients with histopathology-confirmed DDLPS seen from 2000 through 2012. The predictive value of clinical and histopathologic parameters for metastasis later in the disease course was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival of patients with and without metastasis was compared using Log-rank test.

RESULTS

Records of 148 patients (57 women, 91 men; mean age 59 years, range 30-87 years) were reviewed. Distant metastases were observed in 44/148 patients (29.7%), 9/44 (20.5%) at presentation and 35/44 (79.5%) developing them later at a median interval of 8 months (IQR = 0.80-26 months). Median duration of follow-up was 38 months (IQR = 18-74 months) with 77/148 patients (31 with metastases) deceased at the time of analysis. Median survival was 28 months (IQR = 10-56 months) for patients with metastases and 38 months (IQR, 17-65 months) for patients without metastases (p = 0.0123, Log-Rank test; Hazard ratio 1.79 [95% confidence interval 1.11-2.84]). Lung was the most common site of metastases (33 patients, 22.3%). On univariate analysis, grade and local recurrence were associated with subsequent risk of metastasis where as age, tumor size, site, de novo dedifferentiation, number of previous surgical resections, margin positivity and chemoradiation were not. On multivariate analysis, high tumor grade (p-value = 0.0005, OR 5.05; 95% CI 2.01-13.48) and local recurrence (p-value = 0.0025, OR 4.46; 95% CI 1.67-13.40) predicted metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Lung was most frequent site of DDLPS metastases. Risk of developing metastatic disease was statistically associated with tumor grade and local recurrence. Metastatic disease was associated with decreased survival.

The role of radiation in retroperitoneal sarcomas

OPINION STATEMENT

Retroperitoneal sarcomas form a group of rare malignancies that require expertise in every aspect of management. Patients benefit from referral to cancer centers that can provide comprehensive, multidisciplinary, oncologic management. The role of radiation in retroperitoneal sarcoma management is, appropriately, the subject of considerable controversy due to the absence of high-level evidence proving its efficacy. Nonetheless, the preponderance of available data suggests that radiation therapy likely improves local control and, in some settings, may favorably impact resectability and survival. These outcome observations coupled with the lower doses (45-54 Gy) and normal tissue displacement characteristic of preoperative radiation therapy leads us to favor preoperative radiotherapy followed by oncologic resection for most retroperitoneal sarcomas. This strategy appears to provide the highest chance of safe and successful delivery of multimodal therapy, which can otherwise be hindered by postoperative complications as a result of technically challenging surgery and normal tissue radiation dose tolerances. Dose-escalation and selective integrative boosts to "at-risk" margins are attractive strategies that merit, and arguably require, further clinical evaluation. We believe that postoperative radiotherapy should be reserved for very high-risk cases and should be treated to a dose of ≥60 Gy respecting normal tissue dose tolerances. An additional approach that we consider in the postoperative setting is close surveillance with consideration of preoperative radiotherapy at recurrence before repeat surgical resection. Highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, such as IMRT with image guidance, should be employed to minimize dose to normal tissues and thereby allow delivery of efficacious radiation doses. If feasible, referral to a treatment facility with proton beam therapy should be discussed with the patient, especially if normal tissue dose constraints cannot be met using IMRT/IGRT. Participation in prospective studies should be highly encouraged.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To present recommendations for the use of brachytherapy (BT) in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

METHODS

A group of practitioners with expertise and experience in sarcoma BT formulated recommendations for BT in STS based on clinical experience and literature review.

RESULTS

The indications for adjuvant BT are discussed. There is no consensus on the use of BT alone or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), but factors that influence the selection of this modality include tumor grade and size, prior surgeries, and tumor recurrence. Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate radiation are all acceptable BT modalities to use for STS. Recommendations are made for patient selection, techniques, dose rates, and dosages. Outcome data and toxicity data are reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

BT is a useful component of the treatment of STS. The advantages of BT are the targeted dose distribution, low integral dose, and short treatment times. Ultimately the clinician should select the modality or combination of modalities that are most familiar to the treatment team and suitable to the patient.

High-dose pre-operative helical tomotherapy (54 Gy) for retroperitoneal liposarcoma

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of pre-operative radiotherapy (54 Gy) with Helical Tomotherapy (HT) followed by surgery.

Methods and materials

Ten patients with non-metastatic resectable retroperitoneal liposarcomas were treated by pre-operative tomotherapy (54 Gy) and surgery. Clinical and biological toxicities were evaluated on the CTCAEV3.0 scale. For nine patients, delivered tomotherapy plans were compared with retrospectively-planned dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) dosimetric studies.

Results

No immediate or late Grade>2 toxicities were observed after radiotherapy. Post-operatively, one patient died and three patients experienced Grade 3 toxicity (two digestive and one metabolic). These toxicities disappeared and only two patients presented persistent Grade 1 paresthesia. R0 resection was obtained for four patients, R1 for four, and R2 resection for two. With a median follow-up of 26 months, no local or metastatic relapse was observed. Dosimetric comparisons between HT and retrospectively-planned IMRT demonstrate adequate target volume coverage for both techniques. Gastrointestinal sparing is higher with HT with a D200cc reduced by 5 Gy. Integral dose (ID) was increased in HT.

Conclusions

High dose pre-operative radiotherapy (54 Gy) for retroperitoneal liposarcoma is feasible and mostly well tolerated. Cumulative toxicity and tolerance depend mainly on patient’s general status. Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) is essential, irrespective of the IMRT technique used. Furthermore, HT offers the possibility of sparing selected areas in such complex volumes.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas- a challenging problem

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are relatively rare tumours and usually present in a locally advanced stage. Liposarcoma is the most common histopathology. If operable, surgery is the treatment of choice. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy is not yet defined. Advanced cases are treated by chemotherapy. The prognosis is poor in patients with positive resection margins, high-grade tumours and recurrent tumours.

Multimodality local therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma

PURPOSE

Soft-tissue sarcomas of the retroperitoneum are rare tumors comprising less than 1% of all malignancies. Although surgery continues as the mainstay of treatment, the large size of these tumors coupled with their proximity to critical structures make resection with wide margins difficult to achieve. The role and timing of radiotherapy are controversial. This study updates our institutional experience using multimodality local therapy for resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma and identifies prognostic factors impacting disease control and survival.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1974 and 2007, 58 patients with nonmetastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma were treated with surgery and radiation at the University of Florida. The median age at radiotherapy was 57 years old (range, 18-80 years). Forty-two patients received preoperative radiotherapy and 16 received postoperative radiotherapy. Nineteen patients received 1.8 Gy once daily and 39 patients received 1.2 Gy twice daily. Variables analyzed for prognostic value included age, grade, kidney involvement, histology, de novo versus recurrent presentation, tumor diameter, margin status, radiotherapy sequencing (preoperative vs. postoperative), total radiation dose, fractionation scheme, and treatment era.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival, and local control rates were 49%, 58%, and 62%, respectively. Nearly two-thirds of disease failures involved a component of local progression. On multivariate analysis, only margin status was significantly associated with improved 5-year local control (85%, negative margins; 63%, microscopic positive margins; 0%, gross positive margins; p < 0.0001) and 5-year overall survival (64%, negative margins; 56%, microscopic positive margins; 13%, gross positive margins; p = 0.0012). Thirty-one Grade 3 or greater toxicities were observed in 22 patients, including two treatment-related deaths (3%).

CONCLUSION

For retroperitoneal sarcoma, local control remains a challenge and combined-modality therapy may be associated with significant acute and late morbidity. Our patterns of failure data suggest that improvements in local control may translate into a survival benefit.

[Surgery and postoperative radiation therapy in primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: experience of the cancer centre Alexis-Vautrin]

PURPOSE

Surgical resection remains the standard treatment for patients with resectable retroperitoneal sarcomas. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the outcomes of patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analysed data of 50 patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma who underwent curative-intent resection from 1975 to 2008. External beam radiotherapy and chemotherapy were delivered postoperatively. Demographics, surgical, pathological variables and chemo/radiation therapy were analysed as prognosis factors.

RESULTS

There were 22 males and 28 females (mean age 54 ± 13 years). Surgery required visceral resections in 30 patients. There were 16 leiomyosarcomas, 25 liposarcomas and eight other sub-types. Twenty-one patients had clear surgical margins. Twenty-eight patients received postoperative external beam radiotherapy (median 45 Gy) and 15 received chemotherapy. At the end of the follow-up (median 55 months), local recurrence occurred in 39% (n=14) among R0/R1 resection group (n=36). Postoperative external beam radiotherapy tends to increase the time of local recurrence from surgery (27 vs. 13 months, P=0.05). The overall survival rates were 81%, 55% and 46% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Although R0 resection (P=0.01), well tumour differentiation (P=0.004) and postoperative external beam radiotherapy (P=0.02) significantly influenced overall survival in univariate analysis, only R0 resection was an independent prognostic factor in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

We confirm the pre-eminence of radical surgery with negative margins as major prognostic factor and the benefit of postoperative radiotherapy.

Treatment outcome of postoperative radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma

Purpose

To evaluate the treatment outcome and prognostic factor after postoperative radiotherapy in retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Materials and Methods

Forty patients were treated with surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma from August 1990 to August 2008. Treatment volume was judged by the location of initial tumor and surgical field, and 45-50 Gy of radiation was basically delivered and additional dose was considered to the high-risk area.

Results

The median follow-up period was 41.4 months (range, 3.9 to 140.6 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 51.8% and disease free survival was 31.5%. The 5-year locoregional recurrence free survival was 61.9% and distant metastasis free survival was 50.6%. In univariate analysis, histologic type (p = 0.006) was the strongest prognostic factor for the OS and histologic grade (p = 0.044) or resection margin (p = 0.032) had also effect on the OS. Histologic type (p = 0.004) was unique significant prognostic factor for the actuarial local control.

Conclusion

Retroperitoneal sarcoma still remains as a poor prognostic disease despite the combined modality treatment including surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Selective dose-escalation of radiotherapy or combination of effective chemotherapeutic agent must be considered to improve the treatment result especially for the histopathologic type showing poor prognosis.

The management of soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas are a rare and heterogenous group of malignancies that are derived from the mesenchymal cell lines. In the last few decades, the management of these lesions has been improved by the introduction of dedicated Multi Disciplinary Teams (MDTs) where most bone and soft tissue tumours are now treated.(1) Following the recent changes to management outlined by the NICE/IOGs, we believe it is pertinent to review the current thinking on soft tissue tumour management.(2) We also discuss the principles of diagnosis and treatment and the role of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review. In the preparation of this paper, we have referred to recent NICE guidelines in this field and have performed a Medline search of the existing literature.

RESULTS

The key to the success is early and appropriate patient referral. Whilst the responsibility for performing surgery has shifted away from the generalist and towards the super specialist, improvements in survivability can be achieved by promoting basic knowledge within the medical profession as a whole.

CONCLUSIONS

Both excision and biopsy of a soft tissue sarcoma by a non-specialist surgeon have been shown to increase the risk of tumour recurrence and all invasive procedures should now be performed within the MDT setting.

Retroperitoneal tumours: review of management

INTRODUCTION

The retroperitoneum can host a wide spectrum of pathologies, including a variety of rare benign tumours and malignant neoplasms that can be either primary or metastatic lesions. Retroperitoneal tumours can cause a diagnostic dilemma and present several therapeutic challenges because of their rarity, relative late presentation and anatomical location, often in close relationship with several vital structures in the retroperitoneal space.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed. Relevant international articles published in the last ten years were assessed. The keywords for search purposes included: retroperitoneum, benign, sarcoma, neoplasm, diagnosis and surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy. The search was limited to articles published in English. All articles were read in full by the authors and selected for inclusion based on relevance to this article.

RESULTS

Tumours usually present late and cause symptoms or become palpable once they have reached a significant size. Retroperitoneal tumours are best evaluated with good quality cross-sectional imaging and preoperative histology by core needle biopsy is required when imaging is non-diagnostic. Sarcomas comprise a third of retroperitoneal tumours. Other retroperitoneal neoplasms include lymphomas and epithelial tumours or might represent metastatic disease from known or unknown primary sites. The most common benign pathologies encountered in the retroperitoneum include benign neurogenic tumours, paragangliomas, fibromatosis, renal angiomyolipomas and benign retroperitoneal lipomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete surgical resection is the only potential curative treatment modality for retroperitoneal sarcomas and is best performed in high-volume centres by a multidisciplinary sarcoma team. The ability completely to resect a retroperitoneal sarcoma and tumour grade remain the most important predictors of local recurrence and disease-specific survival.

The role of irradiation in the management of locally recurrent non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of extremity/trunkal locations

Background: Patients who have had initial curative intent therapy for non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, and who subsequently relapse at the initial site without evidence of metastatic disease, have various options regarding local treatment. The treatment options available will be determined by the extent of relapse, previous therapy rendered, and patient characteristics. We reported on a series of 31 patients treated initially with only surgery for extremity/trunkal high-grade soft tissue sarcoma and then seen for recurrence at our institution between 1980 and 1999. Local re-treatment consisted of combined modality therapy, most often aggressive surgical debulking/resection and irradiation, in an effort to reduce the need for amputation and, where anatomically allowable, to maintain a functional limb. We report our results in re-establishing local control, subsequent survival, and complication rates.

Methods: Thirty-one patients with locally recurrent, non-metastatic high-grade soft tissue sarcoma, (excluding extraabdominal desmoid) were retrospectively reviewed to determine local control, survival, and complication rates associated with the relapsed disease. All patients had multimodality re-treatment most often utilizing aggressive surgical debulking and irradiation. The irradiation consisted of either external beam alone, brachytherapy alone, or a combination of external beam and brachytherapy. Nine patients also received multi-agent, multi-cycle chemotherapy using various regimens. In addition, the impact of surgical margin at the time of re-resection (gross versus microscopic disease), radiation treatment type, total radiation dose delivered, size of relapse, histological sub-type, sex and age, were evaluated to determine if they had any impact on the re-establishment of local control and subsequent survival.

Results: Local control was re-established in 25 of 31 (80.6%) patients. Two additional patients with isolated local relapse after irradiation were salvaged with amputation and remain NED at last follow-up. With these patients a total of 27/31 (87%) are now with local control. At last follow-up, which ranged from 23 to 192 months, 23 of 31 (74%) remained alive. Of the eight patients who have died, four had evidence of local and distant failure. Two additional patients died of distant failure while the treated sites remained in local control and two patients, both NED, died of intracurrent processes. Follow-up for those patients who had re-established local control has ranged from 23 to 192 months (median=60.5 months). Time to local failure following re-treatment ranged between 3 and 72 months following re-treatment (median=12 months). Five patients had significant treatment related complications. Included are two patients in which amputation was required due to local recurrences. Two patients developed a soft tissue necrosis and one patient had a wound healing problem that resolved with conservative management. No statistical significance in the development of local control could be found based on surgical margin status, total dose of irradiation (greater or less than 60 Gy), size of recurrence (greater than 5 cm), histological sub-type, sex, or age (greater than 50 years). There was a trend for negative impact for those patients receiving only external beam irradiation.

Conclusion: Selective locally recurrent, non-metastatic soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity/trunkal regions should still be considered eligible for aggressive limb-sparing therapy. Our experience suggests that a majority of patients re-establish local control following aggressive surgical resection/debulking and irradiation and this appears to be durable in its nature. The role of chemotherapy in this group of patients remains investigational. In a surprising finding, one patient re-relapsed in the re-treatment site at 72 months, thus justifying continued strict surveillance not only in the primary site but also for subsequent metastatic disease.

Gemcitabine-mediated radiosensitization of human soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Local and systemic control of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) remains a clinical challenge, particularly for retroperitoneal, deep truncal, or advanced extremity disease. 2',2'-Difluoro-2'-deoxycytidine (gemcitabine) is a potent radiosensitizer in many tumor types, but it has not been studied in human STS. The purpose of this study was to determine the radiosensitizing potential of gemcitabine in preclinical models of human STS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The in vitro radiosensitizing activity of gemcitabine was assessed with clonogenic survival assay on three human STS cell lines: SK-LMS-1 (leiomyosarcoma), SW-872 (liposarcoma), and HT-1080 (fibrosarcoma). Cell cycle distribution was determined using dual-channel flow cytometry. The in vivo radiosensitizing activity of gemcitabine was assessed with subcutaneous SK-LMS-1 nude mice xenografts. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with concurrent weekly gemcitabine and fractionated daily radiotherapy (RT) (2 Gy daily) for 3 weeks (a total dose of 30 Gy).

RESULTS

The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) of gemcitabine for the human STS cell lines ranged from 10 to 1000 nM. Significant in vitro radiosensitization was demonstrated in all three human STS cell lines using gemcitabine concentrations at and below the IC(50). Maximal radiosensitization was associated with accumulation of cells in early S-phase. SK-LMS-1 xenografts displayed significant tumor growth delay with combined gemcitabine and RT compared to either treatment alone. Treatment related toxicity was greatest in the gemcitabine plus RT arm, but remained at an acceptable level.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer in preclinical models of human STS. Clinical trials combining gemcitabine and RT in human STS are warranted.

Surgical management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence after surgical resection is the main cause of disease-related mortality in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). This study analysed predictors of local recurrence and disease-specific survival.

METHODS

A prospective database was reviewed to identify patients who underwent surgery for primary RPS between 1990 and 2009. Patient demographics, operative outcomes and tumour variables were correlated with local recurrence and disease-specific survival. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate predictors for local recurrence and disease-free survival.

RESULTS

Macroscopic clearance was achieved in 170 of 200 patients. The median weight of tumours was 4.0 kg and median maximum diameter 27 cm. Resection of adjacent organs was required in 126 patients. The postoperative mortality rate was 3.0 per cent. Seventy-five patients developed local recurrence during follow-up. At 5 years the local recurrence-free survival rate was 54.6 per cent and the disease-specific survival rate 68.6 per cent. Inability to obtain macroscopic clearance at resection and high-grade tumours were significant predictors for local recurrence and disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Complete macroscopic excision should be the goal of surgical resection. Ability to resect a RPS completely and tumour grade are the most important predictors of local recurrence and overall survival.

Radiotherapy and extent of surgical resection in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma: multi-institutional analysis of 261 patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and surgical technique on survival in retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcoma.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted using the National Oncology Database, a proprietary database of aggregated tumor registries owned by IMPAC(R) Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA). Patients who received definitive surgery with negative or microscopic-positive margins were included. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared for statistical significance (P < 0.05) using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-one patients met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 59 months (range 0.2-186 months). The 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS) and local failure-free survival (LFFS) were 73% and 66%, respectively. Grade, margin status, and histology were independent predictors for CSS (P < 0.05). Adjuvant RT was associated with a significant improvement in LFFS over surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.86, P < 0.05). Patients receiving simple excision and RT had a 5-year LFFS of 88%, significantly higher than wide resection with or without RT (log-rank, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant RT is associated with a lower risk of local relapse compared to surgery alone. The impact of surgical technique on adjuvant RT efficacy warrants further study.

Surgery combined with brachytherapy in patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas

Purpose

The primary aim of this work was to analyze feasibility of combined treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RS): surgery (S) and intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBRT). The secondary aim was to analyze results and complications after this treatment.

Material and methods

84 patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas were qualified for combined treatment (S and IOBRT) between June 1998 and September 2006. 65 of the patients (77.4%) had local recurrences. Sarcomas with intermediate and high grade of histological malignancy (G2, G3 – 76.2%) were the most frequent within the all surgically treated patients. Resection ability (R0/R1) in analyzed group of patients was estimated as 85% (74 cases). After intraoperative evaluation, 57 (67.8%) patients were qualified for IOBRT. Since 2000, in 34 patients (60%) an adjuvant postoperative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in dose of 50 Gy was applied. Median follow-up of the surviving patients was 40 months.

Results

On the basis of the univariate analysis, relevant aspects negatively influencing overall survival rate within the RS group treated with IOBRT were as follows: surgery of sarcoma recurrence (p = 0.002), higher grade of histological malignancy (p = 0.05), histological type different than liposarcoma (p = 0.05) as well as no adjuvant EBRT (p = 0.05). On the basis of multivariate analysis one can ascertain that relevant factors negatively influencing LRFS in RS patients treated with IOBRT were: surgery due to recurrence of sarcoma (p = 0.008) and lack of EBRT (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Combined treatment (surgery and brachytherapy) was possible to be carried out on 68% of RS patients. The overall number of complications was quite high, however acceptable, taking into consideration the application of extensive, multi-organ treatments in case of sarcoma recurrences in this localization. The results suggest that the method of treatment will improve the final outcome when most of patients will be qualified for treatment of primary sarcomas in experienced centre.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas: experience at a single institution in Mexico

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RSTS) are a rare and uncommon entity with a poor 5-year overall survival (OS) of approximately 50%, even though they rarely metastasize. The aim of the present study was to analyze the survival of patients with RSTS treated at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with RSTS treated between 1990 and 2008 were included. Variables analyzed were age, sex, histological type, TNM stage, tumor size, grade of differentiation, and treatment (surgery, chemotherapy only, radiotherapy only, adjuvant radiotherapy, and best supportive care). R0, R1, and R2 resection were analyzed. Overall survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and survival comparison by stage, grade, and type of resection were analyzed.

RESULTS

Data for 46 patients were analyzed, 20 men and 26 women. Median age was 51.1 years. Surgery with a curative intent was performed in 32 patients, and R0 resection was feasible in 19 (59.4%). The 5- and 10-year OS rates were 47 and 30%, respectively, for the entire group. The median CSS for resected patients was 102 months; the 5-year OS for stages I, III, and IV was 83, 37, and 0%, respectively; the 5-year OS for low histological grade disease and high histological grade disease was 82 and 35%, respectively; and for R0, R1, and R2 resection, the 5-year OS was 81, 56, and 14%, respectively. Median RFS was 79 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Incomplete surgical resection, unresectable disease, high histological grade, and advanced TNM stage are associated with a poor survival in patients with RSTS. Complete resection is still the treatment of choice.

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the kidney: a clinicopathologic study of 27 cases

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the kidney is a rare entity that has not been well characterized. We retrieved 27 cases of primary renal leiomyosarcomas diagnosed at 3 institutions between 1986 and 2009. Mean patient age at diagnosis was 58.5 years (range 22 to 85), and 59% were female. Mean tumor size was 13.4 cm (range 4 to 26), and 59% of the tumors were identified in the right kidney. Detailed histologic examination was possible for 24 of the cases. Average mitotic count per 10 high-power fields was 11.1 (range 0 to 50), and the average extent of necrosis was 21% (range 0 to 60). Cellular pleomorphism was classified as either focal (n = 13) or extensive (n = 11) and graded as mild (n = 3), moderate (n = 7) or severe (n = 14). Tumors were either grade 2 (n = 12) or grade 3 (n = 12) using the French Federation of Cancer Centers System. Direct extension beyond the kidney capsule was identified in 55% of the cases, and lymphovascular invasion was identified in 26%. Clinical follow-up information was available for 20 of the cases, and patients were followed for an average of 2.8 years (range 0.25 to 9). Distant metastases were identified in 90% of the patients, and 75% eventually died from their tumor's burden. In conclusion, primary renal leiomyosarcomas have a grim prognosis regardless of the underlying histology.

Proton-beam, intensity-modulated, and/or intraoperative electron radiation therapy combined with aggressive anterior surgical resection for retroperitoneal sarcomas

BACKGROUND

We sought to reduce local recurrence for retroperitoneal sarcomas by using a coordinated strategy of advanced radiation techniques and aggressive en-bloc surgical resection.

METHODS

Proton-beam radiation therapy (PBRT) and/or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) were delivered to improve tumor target coverage and spare selected adjacent organs. Surgical resection of tumor and adjacent organs was performed to obtain a disease-free anterior margin. Intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) was delivered to any close posterior margin.

RESULTS

Twenty patients had primary tumors and eight had recurrent tumors. Tumors were large (median size 9.75 cm), primarily liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas (71%), and were mostly of intermediate or high grade (81%). PBRT and/or IMRT were delivered to all patients, preferably preoperatively (75%), to a median dose of 50 Gy. Surgical resection included up to five adjacent organs, most commonly the colon (n = 7) and kidney (n = 7). Margins were positive for disease, usually posteriorly, in 15 patients (54%). IOERT was delivered to the posterior margin in 12 patients (43%) to a median dose of 11 Gy. Surgical complications occurred in eight patients (28.6%), and radiation-related complications occurred in four patients (14%). After a median follow-up of 33 months, only two patients (10%) with primary disease experienced local recurrence, while three patients (37.5%) with recurrent disease experienced local recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Aggressive resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas can achieve a disease-negative anterior margin. PBRT and/or IMRT with IOERT may possibly deliver sufficient radiation dose to the posterior margin to control microscopic residual disease. This strategy may minimize radiation-related morbidity and reduce local recurrence, especially in patients with primary disease.

Patterns of care in a population-based sample of soft tissue sarcoma patients in the United States

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are relatively uncommon tumors. Data regarding the patterns of care of patients with STS and its consistency with available guidelines are relatively sparse. The authors conducted a detailed analysis of STS patients diagnosed in 2002 and sampled from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.

METHODS

The authors sampled 1369 patients with invasive sarcomas. Hospital records were reabstracted, and treating physicians were contacted to verify the therapy provided to each patient.

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 60 years. There was a slight male predominance among the patients with nongynecologic sarcomas. Fifty percent of the patients had localized stage sarcoma. Most patients received surgery, but negative margins were obtained in only 50% of patients. Complete resection was less frequent in patients >or=50 years old. Radiation therapy was used in 53% of patients with extremity sarcomas but in only 20% to 30% of the patients with sarcomas at other sites. About 27% of all patients received chemotherapy. Tumor grade was significantly associated with the use of radiation and chemotherapy. Surgical resection, tumor grade, tumor size, use of radiation therapy, and age significantly influenced survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Patterns of care of STS differ based on the site of the tumor. The patterns of care for extremity sarcomas are fairly consistent with the available recommendations, but the patterns of care for other sites are less consistent. In addition to certain tumor characteristics, age of the patient was significantly associated with therapy and patient outcome.

Radiation therapy in addition to gross total resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma results in prolonged survival: results from a single institutional study

Purpose. Typical treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) is surgery with or without radiation therapy for localized disease. With surgery alone, local failure rates are as high as 90%; this led to radiation therapy playing an important role in the treatment of RPSs. Methods. Thirty-one patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma treated with gross total resection and radiation therapy make up this retrospective analysis. Nineteen were treated preoperatively and 12 postoperatively (median dose, 59.4 Gy)—sixteen also received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) (median dose, 11 Gy). Patients were followed with stringent regimens, including frequent CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Results. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1–66 months), the 2-year overall survival (OS) rate is 70% (median, 52 months). The 2-year locoregional control (LRC) rate is 77% (median, 61.6 months). The 2-year distant disease free survival (DDFS) rate is 70% (median not reached). There were no differences in radiation-related acute and late toxicities among patients treated pre- versus postoperatively, whether with or without IORT. Conclusions. Compared to surgery alone, neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiation therapy offers patients with RPS an excellent chance for long-term LRC, DDS, and OS. The integration of modern treatment planning for external beam radiation therapy and IORT allows for higher doses to be delivered with acceptable toxicities.

Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas: a multivariate analysis of surgical factors associated with local control

PURPOSE

To define the optimal initial management and the best extent of surgery that would optimize margins on primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 382 patients with primary RPS were analyzed. Sixty-five patients had a simple resection of the tumor, 120 patients had a complete compartmental resection (systematic resection of noninvolved contiguous organs), 130 patients had a contiguously involved organ resection, 21 patients had a systematic re-excision, 38 patients had an incomplete gross resection, and eight patients had a biopsy alone. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were administered to 121 and 145 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

One, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 86% (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.89), 66% (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.71), and 57% (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.62), respectively. Median overall survival was 6 years. In the multivariate analysis, high grade, tumor rupture, gross residual disease, and positive margins were associated with decreased OS. Low grade, no tumor rupture, negative histologic margins, a high number of patients undergoing operation per center, and compartmental resection compared with standard procedures were associated with decreased abdominal recurrences. Compartmental resection is a significant variable, predicting a 3.29-fold lower rate of abdominal recurrence compared with simple complete resection.

CONCLUSION

Complete compartmental surgery without tumor rupture should be performed when possible to achieve clear margins. This surgery should be performed in a high-volume center. The role of adjuvant treatments should be evaluated in a randomized trial in association with this optimal surgery.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of sarcomas

Sarcomas represent a heterogeneous, challenging, and rare group of tumors that present many management challenges. In this article, the authors concentrate on the radiotherapeutic management of sarcomas occurring in the most common locations: the extremities, the trunk, and the retroperitoneum. An overview of the current radiotherapeutic management of soft tissue sarcoma is presented in addition to a discussion of how surgical management may affect radiotherapeutic management. Finally, the authors describe current controversies surrounding the appropriate management of sarcomas with radiotherapy and describe ongoing studies and future areas of research.

Sarcomas de alto grau: estudo retrospectivo de 131 casos

OBJETIVO: Relatar as características clínicas dos sarcomas de partes moles de alto grau e apresentar a experiência do Hospital Araújo Jorge no tratamento destes sarcomas. MÉTODO: Análise retrospectiva dos casos de sarcoma de alto grau em adultos admitidos no Hospital Araújo Jorge (HAJ) entre 1996 e 2000. Idade, sexo, características anátomo-patológicas (tamanho e tipo histológico), localização, tratamentos oncológicos realizados (cirurgias de preservação de órgãos e membros, margens, quimioterapia, radioterapia), recorrência local, recorrência distante e sobrevida foram estudados. Análise descritiva, curvas de Kaplan-Meier, log-rank test e teste ÷² foram usados quando pertinentes. RESULTADOS: Foram registrados 235 pacientes com sarcomas de partes moles entre 1996 - 2000, sendo que 131 eram de alto grau. A média de idade foi de 47,2 anos. O tipo histológico não foi determinado em 23,7% dos casos. O tipo mais freqüente foi o leiomiossarcoma (13,7%), seguido do sarcoma sinovial (10,7%) e rabdomiossarcoma (9,2%). O tamanho mediano foi de 10 cm (2-48 cm). A distribuição nos estádios II,III e IV foi de 15%, 55% e 30%, respectivamente. Nos pacientes com estádios II e III, a margem cirúrgica adequada foi obtida em 51,9% dos pacientes. Radioterapia e quimioterapia adjuvantes foram indicadas em 33,7% e 26,1% dos casos, respectivamente. As recorrências locais e distantes ocorreram em 31,5% e 34,8% dos pacientes, respectivamente. A sobrevida global em 5 anos foi 61,8%. CONCLUSÃO: A maioria dos pacientes atendidos no HAJ é portadora de lesões localmente avançadas, volumosas ou com metástase ao diagnóstico. Os pacientes apresentaram evolução adversa, com altas taxas de recorrência local e distante.

[Retroperitoneal sarcomas. Report of five new cases and review of the current situation]

INTRODUCTION

Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a heterogeneous group of rare tumors arising from the mesenchymal cells of the connective tissue. Approximately 15% of these tumors arise in the retroperitoneum. These neoplasms are locally aggressive and the only curative treatment is surgical resection "en-bloc". The main cause of mortality is locoregional recurrence. Five-year survival is 3-58%, depending on the histologic subtype and grade.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Over a 5-year period (2001 to 2006), we performed surgery in five patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas. The mean age was 59 years (range, 46-76) with a male-to-female ratio of 3:2. The most frequent signs were abdominal pain and the appearance of a mass. In 2 patients, an incidental diagnosis was made during the surgical intervention.

RESULTS

Surgical resection was performed in 5 patients but was incomplete in two patients. We removed 2 liposarcomas, 1 leiomyosarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma and 1 fusocellular sarcoma arising in the kidney. Locoregional recurrence occurred in four patients, requiring between 1 and 2 new relaparotomies (using the retroperitoneal approach in 2 patients). There was one death.

CONCLUSIONS

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of tumors, in which the only common factor is the anatomical location. New randomized, prospective, multicenter trials are required to apply different therapeutic options according to the subtype of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Long-Term Outcomes After Radiotherapy for Retroperitoneal and Deep Truncal Sarcoma

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term outcomes after multimodality treatment of retroperitoneal, pelvic, and deep truncal sarcomas and to identify the factors associated with local control (LC), distant metastasis (DM), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 85 patients with retroperitoneal, pelvic, and deep truncal sarcomas were treated with radiotherapy (RT) between 1987 and 2005. A retrospective analysis of LC, DM, and OS was conducted using log-rank and Cox regression statistical methods.

RESULTS

The 2- and 5-year LC, DM, and OS rates were 66% and 51%, 38% and 58%, and 70% and 34%, respectively. Negative surgical margins and a higher radiation dose were associated with greater LC rates on both univariate and multivariate analyses, and female gender was significantly associated with greater LC on multivariate analysis only. None of the analyzed risk factors was significantly associated with DM, although patients with high-grade tumors showed a trend toward an increased risk of DM. Gross residual disease after resection and high tumor grade were associated with worse OS rates on univariate and multivariate analyses, and male gender was significantly associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis only. A time-dependent analysis of LC in relation to DM demonstrated that patients with local failure had a hazard ratio of 19.7 for DM compared with patients without local failure (p < 0.0001). Of the 85 patients, 5 and 8, respectively, had clinically significant acute and late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study emphasize the importance of LC in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Radiation dose escalation or radiosensitization strategies to enhance LC are warranted.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas in children: outcomes from an institution

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are uncommon in children and tend to present as large tumors with advanced locoregional involvement of abdominopelvic structures. Surgical control of these tumors remains to be a management challenge. We reviewed our institutional experience with retroperitoneal sarcomas in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective review of charts dating between 1975 and 2005, we identified patients younger than 18 years who were diagnosed with a histologically confirmed retroperitoneal sarcoma. Patients were followed prospectively through clinic visits and mail correspondence. Standard statistical methods were used for comparative, risk, and survival analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-one children with a mean age at presentation of 9 +/- 1 years were identified. There were more boys than girls (male/female ratio = 1.6). The most common presentations were abdominal mass/distention (76%) and pain (62%). The mean tumor size was 14.2 +/- 1.4 cm, with locoregional involvement in 62% of the patients. The common histologic types were rhabdomyosarcoma (33%) and fibrosarcoma (33%). Seventy-six percent of the patients underwent primary or secondary resection, 71% received neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy therapy, and 38% received radiation therapy. Complete resection was achieved in 48% of the patients, including 3 who required inferior vena cava resection and reconstruction. The 5-year disease-specific survival rates for patients who underwent complete resection and those who underwent incomplete resection were 90% and 36% (P = .018), respectively. For all patients, the mean survival time was 103 +/- 16 months and the 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 62%. Survival was significantly better for patients with low-grade sarcomas than for those with high-grade sarcomas (90% vs 36%, P = .008). Among those who underwent an initial complete resection, 50% had a recurrence at a mean time of 88 +/- 52 months (range = 3-261 months). The 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 0% and 24%, respectively; in addition, 14% of the patients experienced long-term complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcomas can be performed safely with minimal morbidity and mortality. Complete resection and low histologic grade are associated with significantly better disease-specific survival.

Intensity modulated radiation-therapy for preoperative posterior abdominal wall irradiation of retroperitoneal liposarcomas

PURPOSE

Preoperative external-beam radiation therapy (preop RT) in the management of Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas (RPLS) typically involves the delivery of radiation to the entire tumor mass: yet this may not be necessary. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new strategy of preop RT for RPLS in which the target volume is limited to the contact area between the tumoral mass and the posterior abdominal wall.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between June 2000 and Jan 2005, 18 patients with the diagnosis of RPLS have been treated following a pilot protocol of pre-op RT, 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy/day. The Clinical Target Volume (CTV) has been limited to the posterior abdominal wall, region at higher risk for local relapse. A Three-Dimensional conformal (3D-CRT) and an Intensity Modulated (IMRT) plan were generated and compared; toxicity was reported following the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0.

RESULTS

All patients completed the planned treatment and the acute toxicity was tolerable: 2 patients experienced Grade 3 and 1 Grade 2 anorexia while 2 patients developed Grade 2 nausea. IMRT allows a better sparing of the ipsilateral and the contralateral kidney. All tumors were successfully resected without major complications. At a median follow-up of 27 months 2 patients developed a local relapse and 1 lung metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy of preop RT is feasible and well tolerated: the rate of resectability is not compromised by limiting the preop CTV to the posterior abdominal wall and a better critical-structures sparing is obtained with IMRT.

Use of Tissue Expanders and Pre-operative External Beam Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

We report our experience of treating retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) using pre-operative external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in combination with radical resectional surgery from 1990 to 2005.

METHODS

Twenty-eight primary and 10 recurrent tumors were identified from a prospective database.

RESULTS

The resection rate was 71% overall; 82% in primary (23/28) and 40% (4/10) in recurrent cases. EBRT was administered preoperatively in 25 patients, postoperatively in 1, and palliatively in 11. In 33 patients a saline-filled tissue expander was inserted into the abdomen before radiotherapy to displace small bowel from the radiation field. 4,500-5,000 cGy was administered in fractions of 180-200 cGy over a 5-week period; surgery followed 6-8 weeks later. Expander insertion was associated with minimal morbidity; 31/37 patients received a dose of 4,000 cGy or more (median 4,650 cGy). Median resected tumor diameter was 13 cm, and a median of three adjacent organs was resected per patient. Complete macroscopic resection was achieved in 25/27 patients (93%); R0 in 9 (33%) and R1 in 13 (48%) (microscopic margins unclear in 5). There was no postoperative mortality. Tumors were high-grade in 20 patients, low-grade in 14 and ungraded in 4. Actuarial 5- and 10-year survival for all patients was 74 and 60%. For operable primary tumors, the 5-year survival and disease-free rates were 90 and 80%. In four patients with operable recurrent tumors, median disease-free interval was 91 months (27-160). In the 11 inoperable cases, median survival after radiotherapy was 48 months (9-77).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that a combination of pre-operative tissue expander placement, high-dose EBRT and radical resectional surgery can achieve acceptable morbidity, extended survival and low long-term recurrence in patients with RPS.

STATISTICS

Median (interquartile range).

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: an analysis of radiation and surgical treatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with localized retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) treated with complete surgical resection and radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical records of 83 patients were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty patients presented with primary disease and the remaining 23 had recurrence after previous surgical resection.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 47 months, the actuarial overall disease-specific survival (DSS), distant metastasis-free survival, and local control (LC) rates were 44%, 67%, and 40%, respectively. Of the 38 patients dying of disease, local disease progression was the sole site of recurrence for 16 patients and was a component of progression for another 11 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that histologic grade was associated with the 5-year rates of DSS (low-grade, 92%; intermediate-grade, 51%; and high-grade, 41%, p = 0.006). Multivariate analysis also indicated an inferior 5-year LC rate for patients presenting with recurrent disease, positive or uncertain resection margins, and age greater than 65 years. The data did not suggest an improved local control with higher doses of external-beam radiation (EBRT) or with the specific use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT). Radiation-related complications (10% at 5 years) developed in 5 patients; all had received their EBRT postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although preoperative radiation therapy and aggressive surgical resection is well tolerated in patients, local disease progression continues to be a significant component of disease death. In this small cohort of patients, the use of higher doses of EBRT or IORT did not result in clinically apparent improvements in outcomes.

Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy treatment and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy of retroperitoneal sarcoma

PURPOSE

To compare step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SAS-IMRT) and helical tomotherapy (Tomo) dosimetry plans for patients who have received adjuvant radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RSTS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review was performed for seven patients who received either SAS-IMRT or Tomo as adjuvant radiation therapy for RSTS. In each case, a treatment plan of the other modality was generated so that SAS-IMRT and Tomo could be compared.

RESULTS

The average percentage of clinical target volume (CTV) that received less than the prescription dose was 1.4% for Tomo compared to 3.8% for SAS-IMRT. Both SAS-IMRT and Tomo plans provided comparable and significant reductions in volume of small bowel receiving greater than 45 Gy compared to simple opposing standard radiation fields. For the ipsilateral kidney, Tomo significantly reduced the volume of kidney that received at least 15 Gy (average 22% for Tomo vs. 56% for SAS-IMRT).

CONCLUSION

Both SAS-IMRT and Tomo can encompass the large CTV often required for patients with RSTS, although Tomo provides superior dose uniformity. Both SAS-IMRT and Tomo can minimize the volume of small bowel receiving greater than 45 Gy. Tomo was superior to SAS-IMRT in minimizing the volume of ipsilateral kidney irradiated to greater than 15 Gy when the CTV is adjacent to a kidney. Dose escalation and target margin expansion may thus become realistic possibilities.

EFFECT OF RESECTION AND OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH RETROPERITONEAL SARCOMA

BACKGROUND

A consecutive series of 47 patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) were resected and prospectively followed.

METHOD

Between July 1994 and March 2005, 47 patients (24 men, 23 women; mean age, 56 years; range, 17-82 years) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 23 patients had primary RPS and 24 patients had recurrent RPS. A total of 30 out of 47 patients (64%) underwent removal of contiguous intra-abdominal organs. The peroperative mortality was nil and significant preoperative complications occurred in eight cases only (17%). High tumour grade and incomplete resection were significant variables for a worse survival in all 47 patients, both in the univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.008 and P = 0.016, respectively). Among 28 radically resected patients, only histological grade affected overall survival (90% 5-year survival for low-grade tumour vs 26% 5-year survival for high-grade tumour; P = 0.006) with a similar effect noted for disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Histological grade was the only factor that affected overall and disease-free survival for RPS tumours. An aggressive surgical approach in both primary and recurrent RPS is associated with long-term survival.

SURGICAL MARGIN AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL IN SOFT TISSUE SARCOMA

BACKGROUND

The goal of surgeons treating soft tissue sarcoma is to gain local control, to avoid risk of local recurrence and to avoid compromise of the patient's potential survival. The aim of the investigation was to assess the significance of the extent of surgical margin on the chance of death, metastasis and local recurrence.

METHODS

Two hundred and seventy-nine patients who presented with soft tissue sarcoma without metastatic disease were analysed.

RESULTS

The extent of the surgical margin was not clinically or statistically significant in the development of metastatic disease. The presence of a contaminated surgical margin led to a significantly higher rate of local recurrence (as did a narrow surgical margin less than 1 mm). A margin greater than 1 mm allowed a satisfactory outcome in terms of low local recurrence rates. In terms of overall survival, the failure to achieve a wide surgical margin (wide contaminated margin) led to an increased relative death rate. However, when the margin was not contaminated (even if the margin was very close, less than 1 mm), the overall survival rate was similar across all groups. Patients who had radical resections did poorly; they generally belonged to a group in which palliative surgery was carried out, and they showed very high relative metastasis and death rates.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides statistically significant evidence that increasing the width of resection improves local control and overall survival.

Adult soft tissue sarcomas: Conventional therapies and molecularly targeted approaches

The therapeutic approach to soft tissue sarcomas (STS) has evolved over the past two decades based on the results from randomized controlled trials, which are guiding physicians in the treatment decision-making process. Despite significant improvements in the control of local disease, a significant number of patients ultimately die of recurrent/metastatic disease following radical surgery due to a lack of effective adjuvant treatments. In addition, the characteristic chemoresistance of STS has compromised the therapeutic value of conventional antineoplastic agents in cases of unresectable advanced/metastatic disease. Therefore, novel therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to improve the prognosis of patients with STS. Recent advances in STS biology are paving the way to the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which relies not only on the knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying cancer development/progression but also on the personalization of the therapeutic regimen according to the molecular features of individual tumours. In this work, we review the state-of-the-art of conventional treatments for STS and summarize the most promising findings in the development of molecularly targeted therapeutic approaches.

Chirurgie des sarcomes rétropéritonéaux

Retroperitoneal sarcomas comprise approximately 15% of all soft tissue sarcomas and 50% of all retroperitoneal tumours. Helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis, with selective use of MRI will establish the extent of the tumour, its retroperitoneal location, the degree of necrosis, and the evidence of metastasis. A CT guided core needle biopsy is the optimal pre operative tissue sampling. A complete surgical resection is the mainstay of the treatment with a rim of normal tissue that often requires removal of adjacent organs. The 5-year probability of local control is approximately 50%. The role of adjuvant therapy is evolving and at present should not be used outside the investigational setting.

Surgery Combined With Intraoperative Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of treatment of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RSTS) by surgery combined with intraoperative brachytherapy (IOBRT).

METHODS

Seventy adult patients with RSTS were considered for combined treatment (surgery plus IOBRT) between June 1998 and February 2004. There were 64 (91%) recurrent tumors, and 93% of tumors exceeded 5 cm. IOBRT was performed with high-dose-rate Gammamed 12 with iridium 192 (IOBRT time range, 20-87 minutes; median, 56 minutes).

RESULTS

After intraoperative re-evaluation, 24 patients (34%) were found to be ineligible for IOBRT because of multiple intraperitoneal recurrences, macroscopically nonradical resection, poor general condition, and technical aspects. Thirty-seven patients underwent IOBRT immediately after surgery during the same general anesthesia procedure. Nine patients underwent delayed IOBRT within 1 to 3 days after the primary operation. Ten (21.5%) of 46 patients underwent reoperation because of surgical complications. One patient died in the postoperative period. After IOBRT, 24 patients (52%) underwent adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to a total dose of 50 Gy. Over a median follow-up time of 20 months, the estimated 5-year overall survival and local recurrence-free survival rates in IOBRT patients were 55% and 51%, respectively. Application of adjuvant EBRT showed a favorable local control rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The scheduled combined treatment (surgery plus IOBRT) was possible to perform in 66% of RSTS cases that received surgical treatment. The complication rate was high, but we consider it acceptable because of the necessity for extensive aggressive surgical treatment in regionally advanced RSTS. EBRT seems to be an indispensable part of treatment that provides better local control.