Evidence-based estimate of appropriate radiotherapy utilization rate for prostate cancer

Circulating levels of IL-6 and TGF-β1 in patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy: associations with acute radiotoxicity and fatigue symptoms

Background

The goal of research was to investigate the possible relations between serum concentrations of IL-6 and TGF-β1, individual and clinical characteristics, and adverse effects of radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer: acute and late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue.

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer who were treated with radiotherapy were enrolled in this study. The acute radiotoxicity grades and fatigue levels were assessed during the radiotherapy and 1 month after the radiotherapy. Estimation of the late radiotoxicity was performed every three months in the first year, every four months in the second year, and then every six months. Serum levels of IL-6 and TGF-β1 were determined before radiotherapy and after the 25th radiotherapy fraction by ELISA.

Results

The significant positive association between diabetes mellitus and changes in acute genitourinary toxicity grades during the radiotherapy was observed in prostate cancer patients. In addition, patients who were smokers had significantly higher maximum fatigue levels in comparison with patients who were non-smokers. The circulating IL-6 levels were significantly higher after the 25th radiotherapy fraction in comparison with levels determined before radiotherapy. The significant positive correlations between pretreatment TGF-β1 levels and maximum genitourinary toxicity grades and between TGF-β1 levels after the 25th fraction and genitourinary toxicity grades after the 25th fraction, were found. The pretreatment IL-6 concentrations and TGF-β1 concentrations after the 25th fraction were positively correlated with maximum genitourinary toxicity grades. The IL-6 levels after the 25th fraction were positively associated with genitourinary toxicity grades after this fraction. The pretreatment IL-6 concentrations were significantly positively correlated with maximum fatigue scores. The significant positive correlation between IL-6 concentrations and fatigue scores after the 25th fraction was determined. The positive correlations between IL-6 and TGF-β1 concentrations measured after the 25th fraction and maximum fatigue scores were observed.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that serum levels of IL-6 and TGF-β1 might influence the severity of acute genitourinary radiotoxicity and fatigue in patients with prostate cancer. Combining clinical parameters and circulating cytokine levels might be useful for the prediction of adverse reactions to radiotherapy.

The radiotherapy utilization rate in pediatric tumors: An analysis of 13,305 patients

PURPOSE

Although the radiotherapy utilization rate (RUR) is determined for most adult cancers, it is seldom reported in childhood tumors, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) where the majority of pediatric cancer patients reside. This study aims to investigate the real-life RUR for pediatric tumors in a large LMIC center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The electronic files of patients treated at a single institution during 2010-2017 were reviewed and the RUR was defined as the percentage of patients who received at least one radiotherapy (RT) course from the total number of patients.

RESULTS

A total of 4390 out of 13,305 pediatric cancer patients received at least one RT course with a RUR of 33%. The curative, salvage, and palliative RURs were 27.8%, 2%, and 5.7%, respectively. There was a considerable variation in the RUR between various tumors, ranging from 0% in choroid plexus papilloma and other rare tumors to 100% in intracranial germinoma. Moreover, the RUR varied among different stages within each tumor type. Overall, 753 patients received 920 palliative RT courses (range 1-9) at a median dose of 30 Gy. The most commonly irradiated metastatic sites were the bone (34%) and the brain (9.8%).

CONCLUSION

This is the first analysis to provide valuable insights into the RUR for childhood tumors. Together with population-based pediatric cancer registries, this will help decipher pediatric RT needs and deficits. Additionally, the underutilization of palliative RT calls for multidisciplinary palliative care provision for pediatric cancer patients.

A Population-Based Study of Palliative Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases in Patients Dying of Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Increasing the survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) may affect the demand for palliative radiation to bone (PRTB). Our aim was to characterize the use of PRTB in patients who died of PCa in British Columbia between 2003 and 2015.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients with a diagnosis of PCa who died during the study period (n = 23,260) were identified from a population-based provincial registry. Patient and treatment characteristics were analyzed. PRTB utilization rate was calculated by year and location. Survival was calculated from the first and the last course of PRTB.

RESULTS

A total of 5701 patients died of PCa, with a median survival from diagnosis of 5.2 years. The overall PRTB utilization rate was 38.6%, with an increasing trend over time. Multiple courses of PRTB were frequent, with 51% of patients receiving ≥2 courses of PRTB. Of the patients who died of PCa (15.2% of the PRTB cohort), 5.4% received PRTB within the last 4 weeks of life, 60% of whom received multiple fractions. Rural areas had a lower referral rate and lower use of PRTB. Patients with longer survival tended to receive multiple courses of treatment. The median survival after the first course of PRTB increased from 8.2 months in 2003 to 2004 to 9.4 months in 2013 to 2014 (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

PRTB is only used in a minority of patients dying of PCa. The majority who die of PCa after PRTB do so within a year of their first course. The use of multifractionation was common in the last 4 weeks of life. Survival after first PRTB increased minimally over time, and additional research is required to identify its association with recent changes in practice. The referral rate and PRTB utilization rate differ between rural and nonrural locations, underlying the importance of accessibility and referral for utilization of PRTB. Investigating other barriers and ensuring equitable access to radiation are needed.

Radiotherapy utilization in developing countries: An IAEA study

BACKGROUND

The planning of national radiotherapy (RT) services requires a thorough knowledge of the country's cancer epidemiology profile, the radiotherapy utilization (RTU) rates and a future projection of these data. Previous studies have established RTU rates in high-income countries.

METHODS

Optimal RTU (oRTU) rates were determined for nine middle-income countries, following the epidemiological evidence-based method. The actual RTU (aRTU) rates were calculated dividing the total number of new notifiable cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in 2012 by the total number of cancer patients diagnosed in the same year in each country. An analysis of the characteristics of patients and treatments in a series of 300 consecutive radiotherapy patients shed light on the particular patient and treatments profile in the participating countries.

RESULTS

The median oRTU rate for the group of nine countries was 52% (47-56%). The median aRTU rate for the nine countries was 28% (9-46%). These results show that the real proportion of cancer patients receiving RT is lower than the optimal RTU with a rate difference between 10-42.7%. The median percent-unmet need was 47% (18-82.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal RTU rate in middle-income countries did not differ significantly from that previously found in high-income countries. The actual RTU rates were consistently lower than the optimal, in particular in countries with limited resources and a large population.

A population-based study examining the influence of a specialized rapid-access cancer clinic on initial treatment choice in localized prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Treatment decisions in localized prostate cancer are complicated by the available choices. A rapid-access cancer clinic (RAC) has been unique to Calgary, AB, since 2007. This RAC offers multidisciplinary prostate cancer education by a urologist, medical oncologist, and radiation oncologist. It is hypothesized that treatment utilization data from decisions taken at RAC may serve to benchmark the appropriateness of treatment decisions on a population level.

METHODS

Records of patients with clinically localized prostate cancer in Alberta between October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2009 were reviewed with ethics approval. Records were linked to the Alberta Cancer Registry database. Clinical, treatment, and health services characteristics pertaining to patients attending RAC were compared to the general population. The primary endpoint was utilization rates of each initial treatment.

RESULTS

During this two-year period, 2838 patients were diagnosed with localized prostate cancer; 375 attended RAC. The utilization rates among RAC patients vs. the whole Alberta population were: prostatectomy 60.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55.3-65.2) vs. 48.0% (95% CI 47.1-50.7; χ² p<0.001); active surveillance 16.0% (95% CI 12.3-19.7%) vs. 13.5% (95% CI 12.2-15.8; χ² p=0.214); radiotherapy 11.7% (95% CI 8.5-15.0) vs. 18.0% (95% CI 16.9-20.5; χ² p=0.002); and hormone therapy 8.0% (95% CI 5.2-10.8) vs. 17.4% (95% CI 16.1-18.9; χ² p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A specialized clinic for localized prostate cancer may be associated with a higher likelihood of receiving surgery or active surveillance as initial treatment compared to the prostate cancer population in Alberta.

Initial experience with intra-fraction motion monitoring using Calypso guided volumetric modulated arc therapy for definitive prostate cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

Accurate delivery of radiation while reducing dose to organs at risk is essential in prostate treatment. The Calypso motion management system detects and corrects both inter- and intra-fraction motion which offers potential benefits over standard alignment to fiducial markers. The aims of this study were to implement Calypso with Dynamic Edge™ gating and to assess both the motion seen, and interventions required.

METHODS

An implementation group was formed which assessed changes needed to standard workflows. Three patients had Calypso beacons inserted into their prostate. All patients were treated using volumetric modulated arc therapy to a dose of 80 Gy in 40 fractions. Standard inter-fraction motion correction using either kilovoltage (kV) orthogonal paired imaging or cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image-guided radiotherapy techniques, were used along with the Calypso system to compare accuracy. A gating threshold of >0.5 cm was used during treatment. Workflow variations along with inter- and intra-fraction motion and interventions required were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 116 fractions were treated using Calypso with Dynamic Edge™ gating. There was a strong concordance between aligning beacons using kV orthogonal imaging or CBCT and Calypso (mean variation ≤0.06 cm). The mean intra-fraction motion detected was ≤0.2 cm in all directions with the largest motion recorded being 2.2 cm in the left direction while the treatment beam was off. Prostate rotation was largest in the pitch direction and 28 fractions exceeded the 10° tolerance. A total of 78 couch shift corrections of ≥0.3 cm were required, usually following standard imaging, and before treatment starting. Three gating events due to intra-fraction motion occurred during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Intra-fraction motion monitoring with Calypso was successfully implemented. Greatest movement was seen between time of standard imaging and treatment starting with more than half the treatments requiring a ≥0.3 cm adjustment. This would not have been detected without intra-fraction monitoring.

What is access to radiation therapy? A conceptual framework and review of influencing factors

OBJECTIVES

Optimal radiation therapy (RT) utilisation rates (RURs) have been defined for various cancer indications through extensive work in Australia and overseas. These benchmarks remain unrealised. The gap between optimal RUR and actual RUR has been attributed to inadequacies in 'RT access'. We aimed to develop a conceptual framework for the consideration of 'RT access' by examining the literature for existing constructs and translating it to the context of RT services. We further aimed to use this framework to identify and examine factors influencing 'RT access'.

METHODS

Existing models of health care access were reviewed and used to develop a multi-dimensional conceptual framework for 'RT access'. A review of the literature was then conducted to identify factors reported to affect RT access and utilisation. The electronic databases searched, the host platform and date range of the databases searched were Ovid MEDLINE, 1946 to October 2014 and PsycINFO via OvidSP,1806 to October 2014.

RESULTS

The framework developed demonstrates that 'RT access' encompasses opportunity for RT as well as the translation of this opportunity to RT utilisation. Opportunity for RT includes availability, affordability, adequacy (quality) and acceptability of RT services. Several factors at the consumer, referrer and RT service levels affect the translation of this opportunity for RT to actual RT utilisation.

CONCLUSION

'Access' is a term that is widely used in the context of health service related research, planning and political discussions. It is a multi-faceted concept with many descriptions. We propose a conceptual framework for the consideration of 'RT access' so that factors affecting RT access and utilisation may be identified and examined. Understanding these factors, and quantifying them where possible, will allow objective evaluation of their impact on RT utilisation and guide implementation of strategies to modify their effects.

Barriers to radiotherapy utilization: Consumer perceptions of issues influencing radiotherapy-related decisions

AIMS

Radiation therapy (RT) is an essential and cost-effective cancer treatment, but it is underutilized in Australia. We aimed to quantify consumers' perceptions of factors that influence RT decisions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted in March-August 2012. Potential participants were invited to complete an electronic survey disseminated through multiple patient support and advocacy groups throughout New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Study invitations were also placed in local newspapers across NSW with hard copy surveys mailed to respondents. Current or past cancer patients (and carers) who had been offered RT were eligible to participate regardless of their RT decision.

RESULTS

Of the 1191 participants (electronic, n = 1153; hard copy, n = 38), 91% were female, most (88%) were current or past patients, and 78% had accepted RT. Issues commonly perceived to be moderate to strong influencers of RT decisions were: concern about acute and long-term side effects; management of side effects; fear and anxiety regarding RT; lack of awareness of RT; lack of local availability of RT; and lack of RT information resources. Those who declined RT were significantly more likely to highlight practical difficulties with receiving RT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although availability of RT is well recognized, other issues such as fear and anxiety about RT and perceived side effects appear to feature prominently in consumers' decisions. Perceived practical difficulties with receiving RT may have influenced those who declined RT. There may be a need for information resources, support services and interventions to increase awareness of RT.

Common genetic variation associated with increased susceptibility to prostate cancer does not increase risk of radiotherapy toxicity

BACKGROUND

Numerous germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms increase susceptibility to prostate cancer, some lying near genes involved in cellular radiation response. This study investigated whether prostate cancer patients with a high genetic risk have increased toxicity following radiotherapy.

METHODS

The study included 1560 prostate cancer patients from four radiotherapy cohorts: RAPPER (n=533), RADIOGEN (n=597), GenePARE (n=290) and CCI (n=150). Data from genome-wide association studies were imputed with the 1000 Genomes reference panel. Individuals were genetically similar with a European ancestry based on principal component analysis. Genetic risks were quantified using polygenic risk scores. Regression models tested associations between risk scores and 2-year toxicity (overall, urinary frequency, decreased stream, rectal bleeding). Results were combined across studies using standard inverse-variance fixed effects meta-analysis methods.

RESULTS

A total of 75 variants were genotyped/imputed successfully. Neither non-weighted nor weighted polygenic risk scores were associated with late radiation toxicity in individual studies (P>0.11) or after meta-analysis (P>0.24). No individual variant was associated with 2-year toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a high polygenic susceptibility for prostate cancer have no increased risk for developing late radiotherapy toxicity. These findings suggest that patients with a genetic predisposition for prostate cancer, inferred by common variants, can be safely treated using current standard radiotherapy regimens.

Estimation of the optimal utilisation rates of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer by a review of clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to construct an evidence-based model of optimal treatment utilisation for prostate cancer, incorporating all local treatment modalities: radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and brachytherapy (BT); and then to compare this optimal model with actual practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Evidence-based guidelines were used to construct a prostate cancer treatment decision-tree. The proportion of patients who fulfilled treatment criteria was drawn from the epidemiological literature. These data were combined to calculate the overall proportion of patients that should optimally have RP, EBRT and/or BT at least once during the course of their disease. The model was peer reviewed and tested by sensitivity analyses and compared with actual practice.

RESULTS

Optimal utilisation rates, at some point during the disease course, were: RP, 24% (range 15-30%); EBRT, 58% (range 54-64%); BT, 9.6% (range 6.0-17.9%); and any RT, 60% (range 56-66%). Many patients had indications for more than one of these treatments, and at least one of these treatments was indicated in 76% of patients. The model was sensitive to patient preference estimates. Optimal rates were achievable in some health care jurisdictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Modelling optimal utilisation of all local treatment options for a particular cancer is possible. These optimal prostate cancer treatment rates can be used as a planning and quality assurance tool, providing an evidence-based benchmark against which can be measured patterns of practice.

Radiotherapy in the Barwon South Western Region: a rural perspective

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-related mortality rates are higher in rural areas compared with urban regions. Whether there are corresponding geographical variations in radiotherapy utilisation rates (RURs) is the subject of this study.

METHODS

RURs for the regional centre of Geelong and rural areas of the Barwon South Western Region were calculated using a population-based database (2009).

RESULTS

Lower RURs were observed for rural patients compared with the Geelong region for prostate cancer (15.7% vs 25.8%, P = 0.02), rectal cancer (32.8% vs 44.7%, P = 0.11), lymphoma (9.4% vs 26.2%, P = 0.05), and all cancers overall (25.6% vs 28.9%, P = 0.06). This lower rate was significant in men (rural, 19.9%; Geelong, 28.3%; P = 0.00) but not in women (rural, 33.6%; Geelong, 29.7%; P = 0.88). Time from diagnosis to radiotherapy was not significantly different for patients from the two regions. Tumour staging within the rural and Geelong regions was not significantly different for the major tumour streams of rectal, prostate and lung cancer (P = 0.61, P = 0.79, P = 0.43, respectively). A higher proportion of tumours were unstaged or unstageable in the rural region for lung (44% vs 18%, P < 0.01) and prostate (73% vs 57%, P < 0.01) cancer.

CONCLUSION

Lower RURs were observed in our rural region. Differences found within tumour streams and in men suggest a complexity of relationships that will require further study.

A criterion-based audit of the technical quality of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the technical quality of external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Canada.

METHODS

This was a multi-institution, retrospective study of a random sample of patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer in Canada. Patterns of care were determined by abstracting details of the patients' management from original records. The quality of patient's technical care was measured against a previously published, comprehensive suite of quality indicators.

RESULTS

32 of the 37 RT centres participated. The total study population of 810 patients included 25% low-risk, 44% intermediate-risk, and 28% high-risk cases. 649 received external beam RT (EBRT) only, for whom compliance with 12 indicators of the quality of pre-treatment assessment ranged from 56% (sexual function documented) to 96% (staging bone scan obtained in high-risk patients). Compliance with treatment-related indicators ranged from 78% (dose to prostate ≥74 Gy in intermediate risk patients not receiving hormone therapy) to 100% (3DCRT or IMRT plan). Compliance varied among centres; no centre demonstrated 100% compliance on all indicators and every centre was 100% compliant on at least some indicators. The number of assessment-related indicators (n=13) with which a given centre was 100% compliant ranged from 4 to 11 (median 7) and the number of the treatment-specific indicators (n=8) with which a given centre was 100% compliant ranged from 6 to 8 (median 8). ADT therapy was utilised in most high-risk cases (191, 92.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

While patterns of prostate cancer care in Canada vary somewhat, compliance on the majority of quality indicators is very high. However, all centres showed room for improvement on several indicators and few individual patients received care that met target benchmarks on all quality measures. This variation is particularly important for indicators such as delivered dose where impact on disease outcome is known to exist, and suggests that quality improvement programmes have the potential to further improve quality of care.

A retrospective study on accessibility of palliative radiation therapy in the management of prostate cancer in British Columbia

Timely administration of palliative radiation therapy (PRT) to manage symptoms derived from advanced prostate cancer is necessary to help alleviate discomfort and improve quality of life. Despite PRT being an effective treatment, analyzing utilization rates in British Columbia (BC), Canada for palliative purposes implies it is an under-utilized medical resource. Access to and utilization of radiation therapy (RT) is lower in remote geographical regions and higher in urban regions where a cancer care facility is close in proximity suggesting the presence of geographical barrier affecting access to health care and services. Equitable access to PRT can be achieved by reducing barriers such as geographical distance. This retrospective cohort study describes accessibility of PRT in the management of prostate cancer and the impact of an additional facility on improving access to PRT.

Development of indicators of the quality of radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a set of indicators of the quality of radiotherapy (RT) for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Following a comprehensive review of the literature to identify candidate quality indicators, we utilized a modified Delphi technique to develop a set of indicators of the quality of RT for localized prostate cancer. The first Delphi round consisted of an online survey in which radiation oncologists were asked to rate the importance of the candidate quality indicators. The second round was a face-to-face meeting of a smaller group of radiation oncologists to discuss, rate, and rank a final set of quality indicators.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 57 candidate quality indicators. After the two rounds of the Delphi process, a final set of 25 indicators was agreed upon. The set includes quality indicators covering all aspects of prostate cancer radical RT management: pre-treatment assessment, external beam RT, brachytherapy, androgen deprivation therapy, and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This new set of quality indicators is more comprehensive than others described in the literature, and can be applied to patterns of care studies that assess the quality of RT for prostate cancer. The process used to develop this set of indicators can be readily adapted for use in other contexts.

Utilisation of radiotherapy in rural and urban areas in British Columbia compared with evidence-based estimates of radiotherapy needs for patients with breast, prostate and lung cancer

AIMS

To compare the existing model estimates of the appropriate rates of radiotherapy for lung, breast and prostate cancers with actual radiotherapy rates in rural, semi-urban and urban areas, and in areas with short and long drive distances to cancer clinics in British Columbia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All registered cases of lung, breast and prostate cancer diagnosed in British Columbia between 1997 and 2007 were identified. The proportion of cancers treated within 1 (RT1Y) and 5 years (RT5Y) of diagnosis were calculated according to rural, semi-urban and urban area, and areas associated with short and long drive distances to cancer clinics in British Columbia.

RESULTS

RT1Y for lung, breast and prostate in urban and rural areas were 47/45%, 57/46% and 31/30%, and for short and long drive times were 47/44%, 56/50% and 31/31% compared with model estimates for initial radiotherapy needs of 41-45%, 57-61% and 32-37%, respectively. RT5Y for lung, breast and prostate in urban and rural areas were 52/47%, 59/48% and 42/39%, and for short and long drive times were 51/47%, 57/50% and 42/42% compared with model estimates for overall radiotherapy needs of 66-83%, 57-61% and 60-61%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy rates vary between and within urban and rural areas in British Columbia. Radiotherapy rates for breast and lung cancer patients are higher, and closer to model estimates of need, in urban areas and short drive time areas. Radiotherapy rates do not vary with drive time or rural versus urban classification for patients with prostate cancer.

[Use of radiotherapy in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority]

BACKGROUND

The National Cancer Plan (NCP) provided the incentives needed to establish a technical infrastructure adequate to meet the medical needs of radiotherapy in cancer care. The goal of this study is to evaluate the development of radiotherapy in South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority (S-E NRHA) and to compare it with the aims of NCP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The material includes the 86,000 courses of radiotherapy performed in S-E NRHA in the period 1985-2008. The data were extracted from existing patient registries and include cancer diagnosis and patient demographic information. The number of treatment series is coupled with cancer incidence of each county and that in S-E NRHA.

RESULTS

During the latter half of the 1980s, radiotherapy was only offered to 50 % (range 30-60 % in the various counties) of those who needed it. The situation had improved in 2007, when this figure was close to 80 %, but there was still a significant discrepancy between counties (67-91 %). With respect to the medical needs, 10 000 additional courses of radiotherapy should have been performed in S-E NRHA in the period 2003-2007.

INTERPRETATION

The demonstrated insufficient use of radiotherapy and the geographical differences between counties are not acceptable. A prerequisite for optimal use of radiotherapy in cancer treatment is that the medical professions strengthen their oncological competence.

Number of patients potentially eligible for proton therapy

A group of Swedish radiation oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy in a facility where one of the principal aims is to facilitate randomized and other studies in which the advantage of protons can be shown and the magnitude of the differences compared with optimally administered conventional radiation treatment, also including intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and brachytherapy, can be shown. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence in Sweden, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours together with information on normal tissue complication rates. In Sweden, it is assessed that between 2200 and 2500 patients annually are eligible for proton beam therapy, and that for these patients the potential therapeutic benefit is so great as to justify the additional expense of proton therapy. This constitutes between 14-15% of all irradiated patients annually.

Estimating the lifetime utilization rate of radiotherapy in cancer patients: the Multicohort Current Utilization Table (MCUT) method

Extensive research has been carried out to establish the appropriate proportion of cancer patients requiring radiotherapy at some point during their illness. However, it is difficult to compare the actual rates against the appropriate rate, because calculating the actual rates requires life-long follow up of cancer patients. We have developed a method, referred to as the Multicohort Current Utilization Table (MCUT) method, to estimate the predicted lifetime utilization rates based on current medical practice. We implemented the method in SAS as a macro, and validated it by comparing the predicted and the actual utilization rates of radiotherapy in lung, breast, and prostate cancer cases diagnosed in Ontario, Canada. The MCUT method could be used to predict lifetime utilization rate of any medical services.

Defining the Need for Breast Cancer Radiotherapy in the General Population: a Criterion-based Benchmarking Approach

AIMS

Determining the appropriate rate of radiotherapy is important for ensuring optimal radiotherapy utilisation and accessibility. A criterion-based benchmark (CBB) was developed for estimating the need for radiotherapy in incident breast cancer cases. Our primary objective was to compare an evidence-based estimate (Ebest) of need against the CBB. These estimates were then compared with radiotherapy rates in Ontario, Canada and the USA. Surgical rates were also examined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Benchmarks were defined in Ontario as communities in proximity to cancer centres and without long waiting lists. Patient data from 1997 to 2001 were prospectively collected from radiotherapy cancer centres. Surgical data were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information database. The public use file of Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) described treatment in the USA.

RESULTS

In total, 4241 cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in benchmark communities. The overall radiotherapy rate by Ebest was 64.0% (95% confidence interval: 58.1-69.8%) compared with the CBB of 60.7% (59.3-62.1%). In comparison, Ontario's overall radiotherapy rate was 55.6% (55.0-56.1%) and in SEER it was 49.3% (48.9-49.6%). Adjuvant radiotherapy rates after lumpectomy were 100% in Ebest and 83.6% (82.0-85.1%) by the CBB. The Ebest and CBB post-mastectomy rates were 21.9% (20.6-23.3%) and 34.6% (32.5-36.7%), respectively. Observed post-lumpectomy radiotherapy rates were 75.1% in Ontario and 65.3% in SEER. Post-mastectomy radiotherapy rates were 29.5% in Ontario and 17.0% in SEER.

CONCLUSIONS

CBB provides a reasonable estimate of the overall need for radiotherapy in breast cancer. Observed radiotherapy rates in Ontario and the USA suggest an age-related decrease in the use of radiotherapy. The benchmark estimate suggests a shortfall of adjuvant breast radiotherapy utilisation in Ontario.

Accessibility as a major determinant of radiotherapy underutilization: A population based study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A survey was conducted of radiotherapy (RT) resources and utilization in a northwestern Italian Region in order to assess geographical variations in radiotherapy utilization rates, and the effects of infrastructure supply on accessibility.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The survey was conducted by analysing standardized utilization rates based on administrative records. The data were analysed at both Regional and Local Health Unit (LHU) level.

RESULTS

Wide variation was found among LHUs RT utilization rates--the sex- and age-standardized rates varied from 1.8/1000 inhabitants to more than 3/1000 inhabitants. Patients resident in LHUs with no RT service showed a lower probability of accessing RT (standardized rate ratio (SRR), 0.82; 95%IC, 0.80-0.85). The utilization rate decreased in relation to the distance between a patient's residence and the nearest RT service; the reduction was greater for patients > or =70 years of age.

CONCLUSION

The wide geographic variation implies lack of equity in access to services. Utilization levels decreased significantly with increasing distance from the nearest RT service, distance being a barrier to access particularly for older persons. The heterogeneous distribution of services on the Regional territory seems a relevant explanation of differences in utilization rates.

The potential of proton beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer, other urological cancers and gynaecological cancers

A group of Swedish oncologists and hospital physicists have estimated the number of patients in Sweden suitable for proton beam therapy. The estimations have been based on current statistics of tumour incidence, number of patients potentially eligible for radiation treatment, scientific support from clinical trials and model dose planning studies and knowledge of the dose-response relations of different tumours and normal tissues. In prostate cancer it is estimated that annually about 300 patients and in gynaecological cancer about 50 patients, are candidates for proton beam therapy. Owing to major uncertainties, it has not been possible to give an estimate of the number of potential patients with urinary bladder cancer.

Referral rates and trends in radiotherapy as part of primary treatment of cancer in South Netherlands, 1988–2002

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To study referral rates and time trends in the use of primary radiotherapy (RT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The proportion and number of irradiated patients were calculated in a population-based setting among 58,436 cancer patients diagnosed between 1988 and 2002.

RESULTS

The number of patients receiving RT within 6 months of diagnosis (RT6mo) increased by about 3.3% annually, the proportion of all incident cases that received RT6mo remained stable (+/-30%). Only 20% of elderly patients (75+) received RT6mo. The proportion of cancer patients that received RT6mo increased markedly between 1988-1992 and 1998-2002 for patients with prostate cancer (15 and 28%, respectively), rectal cancer (33 and 43%) and brain tumours (48 and 67%). The absolute number of irradiated breast cancer patients increased 30% between 1988 and 2002. Among patients with rectal cancer, a shift occurred from postoperative to preoperative RT since 1995. The percentage of irradiated patients with stage I endometrial cancer decreased from 47% in 1988-1992 to 15% in 1998-2002.

CONCLUSIONS

The percentage of cancer patients who received primary RT remained stable throughout 1988-2002, being consistently lower for older patients. The increased number of irradiated patients was due mainly to earlier detection and the ageing of the population. To clarify the overall percentage of patients irradiated, population-based studies on RT given after 6 months since diagnosis are warranted.

Estimating the optimal radiotherapy utilization for carcinoma of the central nervous system, thyroid carcinoma, and carcinoma of unknown primary origin from evidence-based clinical guidelines

BACKGROUND

In this one in a series of articles, the objective was to estimate the ideal proportion of patients with cancer who should receive radiotherapy at least once during the course of their illness based on the best available evidence. This estimate should be useful in planning for future radiotherapy facilities. Optimal rates of radiotherapy for patients with central nervous system (CNS) carcinoma, thyroid carcinoma, or carcinoma of unknown primary site (CUP) have not been studied previously.

METHODS

A systematic review of evidence-based treatment guidelines for the treatment of CNS carcinoma, CUP, and thyroid carcinoma was undertaken. An optimal radiotherapy utilization tree was constructed for each of these malignancies depicting the indications for radiotherapy at various stages of disease. The proportion of patients who had clinical attributes that indicated a possible benefit from radiotherapy was calculated by adding epidemiological data to the radiotherapy utilization tree. The optimal proportion of patients who should receive radiotherapy was then calculated using specialized decision-analysis software. Sensitivity analyses using univariate analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed.

RESULTS

The optimal rates of radiotherapy utilization for carcinoma of the CNS, thyroid carcinoma, and CUP were 92%, 10%, and 61%, respectively. Comparison with actual rates of utilization in South Australia, Sweden, and the U.S. suggested an under-utilization of radiotherapy for CNS carcinoma and CUP. However, the actual rates of radiotherapy for thyroid carcinoma exceeded the optimal rate for some jurisdictions, although some data may have included radioactive iodine, which was not included in the current project.

CONCLUSIONS

It was possible to estimate optimal radiotherapy utilization rates based on evidence. This methodology allowed a comparison of optimal rates with actual rates to identify areas in which improvements in the evidence-based use of radiotherapy can be made, and it may provide valuable data for future radiotherapy service planning.

An evidence-based estimate of the appropriate rate of utilization of radiotherapy for cancer of the cervix

PURPOSE

Current estimates of the proportion of cancer patients who will require radiotherapy (RT) are based almost entirely on expert opinion. The objective of this study was to calculate the proportion of incident cases of cervical cancer that should receive RT by application of an evidence-based approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic review of the literature was done to identify indications for RT for cervical cancer and to ascertain the level of evidence that supported each indication. A survey of Canadian gynecologic oncologists and radiation oncologists who treat cervical cancer was done to determine the level of acceptance of each indication among doctors who practice in the field. An epidemiologic approach was then used to estimate the incidence of each indication for RT in a typical North American population of patients with cervical cancer.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature identified 29 different indications for RT for cervical cancer. The majority of the 75 experts who responded to the mail survey stated that they "usually" or "always" recommended RT in all but one of the clinical situations that were identified as indications for RT on the basis of the systematic review. The analysis of epidemiologic data revealed that, in a typical North American population, 65.4% +/- 2.5% of cervical cancer cases will develop one or more indications for RT at some point in the course of the illness, 63.4% +/- 2.3% will develop indications for RT as part of their initial management, and 2.0% +/- 0.9% will develop indications for RT for progressive or recurrent disease. The effects of variations in case mix on the need for RT was examined by sensitivity analysis, which suggested that the maximum plausible range for the appropriate rate of utilization of RT was 54.3% to 67.9%. The proportion of cases that required RT was stage dependent: 10.6% +/- 1.2% in Stage IA, 74.9% +/- 1.3% in Stage IB, 100% in Stages II and III, and 97.2% +/- 1.1% in Stage IV.

CONCLUSIONS

This evidence-based estimate of the appropriate rate of use of RT for cervical cancer adds to the growing pool of knowledge about the need for RT that will ultimately provide a rational basis for long-term planning for RT programs and for auditing access to RT in the general population.

The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines

Radiotherapy utilization rates for cancer vary widely internationally. It has previously been suggested that approximately 50% of all cancer patients should receive radiation. However, this estimate was not evidence-based. The aim of this study was to estimate the ideal proportion of new cases of cancer that should receive radiotherapy at least once during the course of their illness based on the best available evidence. An optimal radiotherapy utilization tree was constructed for each cancer based upon indications for radiotherapy taken from evidence-based treatment guidelines. The proportion of patients with clinical attributes that indicated a possible benefit from radiotherapy was obtained by adding epidemiologic data to the radiotherapy utilization tree. The optimal proportion of patients with cancer that should receive radiotherapy was then calculated using TreeAge (TreeAge Software, Williamstown, MA) software. Sensitivity analyses using univariate analysis and Monte Carlo simulations were performed. The proportion of patients with cancer in whom external beam radiotherapy is indicated according to the best available evidence was calculated to be 52%. Monte Carlo analysis indicated that the 95% confidence limits were from 51.7% to 53.1%. The tightness of the confidence interval suggests that the overall estimate is robust. Comparison with actual radiotherapy utilization data suggests a shortfall in actual radiotherapy delivery. This methodology allows comparison of optimal rates with actual rates to identify areas where improvements in the evidence-based use of radiotherapy can be made. It provides valuable data for radiotherapy service planning. Actual rates need to be addressed to ensure better radiotherapy utilization.

Radiotherapy to patients with artificial cardiac pacemakers

BACKGROUND

The in vitro studies show that the modern cardiac pacemakers utilising the complementary metal-oxide semi-conductor (CMOS) circuitry can be adversely affected by therapeutic radiation. However, the published clinical data are sparse regarding the safety of radiotherapy delivery to patients with artificial pacemakers. Despite the potential risk of life threatening complications, there are no national guidelines and most radiotherapy departments have no formal clinical risk management strategy in place. A literature review was performed to assess the risks involved in irradiating patients with pacemakers and to identify strategies, which minimise the risk of pacemaker malfunction. Recommendations for radiotherapy departments are made.

CONCLUSION

Modern multi-programmable pacemakers are very sensitive to therapeutic megavoltage irradiation. There is no safe radiation threshold for megavoltage radiation. The low energy kilovoltage X-rays used for radiotherapy simulation cause no pacemaker malfunction. Megavoltage radiation can be safely delivered to patients with cardiac pacemakers provided direct irradiation of pacemakers is avoided, adequate monitoring is done during and after irradiation, and the dose to the pacemaker generator is kept below 2 Gy. Close liaison with cardiologists and a pacemaker clinic is essential and radiotherapy departments should have protocols in place to identify and care for cancer patients with pacemakers.

Overview of national guidelines for infrastructure and staffing of radiotherapy. ESTRO-QUARTS: Work package 1

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to collect the available guidelines for infrastructure and staffing throughout Europe and to develop general guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Questionnaires were sent to representatives in all European countries. Countries were divided into three groups, based on the GDP per capita (low, medium and high resource countries). Based on the results, general guidelines were developed.

RESULTS

41 countries (93.2%), representing over 99% of the European population responded. Guidelines for the number of linear accelerators and personnel were available in about 40% of the countries. For accelerators, the average was 1 per 183,000 inhabitants in the high, 1 per 284,000 in the medium and 1 per 500,000 in the low resource countries. For radiation oncologists, it varied between 1 per 150-400 patients (average: 250) and there was no clear difference between high, medium and low resource countries. For physicists, the average was 1 per 530 patients for high and 1 per 610 for medium or low resource countries. Guidelines for other equipment and staffing are highly dependent on local habits and complexity of the treatments.

CONCLUSION

An accurate overview of existing guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing is obtained. It is suggested to have one linear accelerator per 450 patients, one radiation oncologist per 200-250 patients and one physicist per 450-500 patients (or one per linac). It should be stressed, however, that these are only crude guidelines and that the actual needs heavily depend on population structure, cancer incidence and treatment strategies, which differ between the various countries.

Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adequate and equitable access to radiotherapy (RT) must be a reasonable health care goal for the EU. However, there are large variations among the EU countries and even regional variations within countries in the provision of RT. In this report, we combine the best available evidence on the indications for RT with national epidemiological data to arrive at estimates for the appropriate level of RT infrastructure in the 25 EU countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from three systematic overviews of the best available evidence for the indication for RT in 23 main cancer types are combined with epidemiological data from the EUCAN and GLOBOCAN databases on the crude incidence of each of these cancers in the 25 EU countries. Together with published benchmarks for accelerator throughput this allows estimation of the number of linear accelerators per million people required to facilitate appropriate RT utilization rates in each country. Where possible, the estimates are compared with the detailed data available from Sweden.

RESULTS

The crude incidence of the main cancer types shows large variation among the 25 EU countries. This reflects in part differences in exposure to aetiological risk factors and partly differences among the countries in population age structure. Correspondingly, the estimate of the required number of linear accelerators per million people showed considerable variation: ranging from 4.0 in Cyprus to 8.1 in Hungary. The average for the 25 countries was 5.9 per million people. These estimates were compared with available national guidelines and actual data on RT infrastructure and large shortfalls were found in many countries. Implications for health economics and capacity planning are briefly discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The QUARTS project has developed a model that establishes a direct and transparent link between epidemiological data and indications for RT based on the best available evidence. Comparison of the model estimates with current levels of RT infrastructure has revealed major inequalities in provision of RT in the 25 EU countries. Continuation of this study is recommended as a way of improving RT provision on rational grounds throughout the European community and as a model for health care planning in the EU.

Estimating the optimal external-beam radiotherapy utilization rate for genitourinary malignancies

BACKGROUND

Benchmark radiotherapy utilization rates for genitourinary malignancies are largely unknown, despite the finding that genitourinary cancers comprise approximately 19% of all registered malignancies in Australia.

METHODS

To develop an evidence-based benchmark of the optimal proportion of patients with genitourinary malignancies who should receive at least one course of radiotherapy at some time during their illness, the authors studied treatment guidelines and treatment reviews regarding genitourinary malignancies. Optimal radiotherapy utilization trees were constructed to show the clinical attributes that indicated possible benefit from radiotherapy based on evidence. Epidemiologic incidence data for each of these clinical attributes were obtained to calculate the optimal proportion of all patients with genitourinary cancer for whom radiotherapy was considered appropriate.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with genitourinary malignancies for whom radiotherapy was indicated at some point in their illness, according to the best available evidence, was estimated to be 27% of patients with renal cancer, 58% of patients with bladder cancer, 60% of patients with prostate cancer, and 49% of patients with testicular cancer. The occurrence of ureteric and penile cancers among patients was too rare, and, therefore, these patients were not included in the current study.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a large discrepancy between actual radiotherapy utilization and the evidence-based optimal rate. The authors recommended strategies to implement the evidence-based guidelines. Evidence-based benchmarks for radiotherapy utilization rates such as the ones described in the current study were important in the evaluation of the appropriate use of radiotherapy.

Estimation of an optimal external beam radiotherapy utilization rate for head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy is used commonly in the treatment of patients with head and neck carcinoma. The benchmark radiotherapy utilization rates for head and neck carcinoma largely are unknown. The objective of the current study was to determine the optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for patients with head and neck carcinoma and to compare this optimal rate with actual utilization rates where actual utilization data were available.

METHODS

An optimal radiotherapy utilization tree was constructed that depicted all patients with head and neck carcinoma in whom radiotherapy was indicated according to evidence-based treatment guidelines. The proportions of patients with clinical attributes that indicated possible benefit from radiotherapy were obtained from epidemiological data and were inserted into the utilization tree. The optimal proportion of patients with carcinoma of the head and neck who should receive radiotherapy was calculated by merging the evidence-based recommendations with the epidemiological data in the tree. Optimal rates of radiotherapy utilization were compared with actual rates obtained from population-based studies.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was indicated at some point during their illness in 74% of all patients with head and neck carcinoma. By subsite, the optimal radiotherapy utilization rates were oral cavity, 74%; lip, 20%; larynx, 100%; oropharynx, 100%; salivary gland, 87%; hypopharynx, 100%; nasopharynx, 100%; paranasal sinuses, 100%; and unknown squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, 90%. All treatment recommendations were based on Level III or IV evidence. Assessment of actual radiotherapy utilization rates indicated an increased use of radiotherapy over time for head and neck carcinoma. However, there also were some decreases in the use of radiotherapy for some carcinoma subsites over the past 20 years, despite the lower actual rates compared with the optimal rates. The reasons for these reductions in use were not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The actual radiotherapy utilization rate for patients with head and neck carcinoma corresponded reasonably closely to the optimal rate for some populations but also identified some shortfalls for other patient groups. The results of this study provide a way of assessing shortfalls in radiotherapy.

Stable overall referral rates of primary radiotherapy for newly diagnosed cancer patients in the ageing population of South-Eastern Netherlands, 1975–1998

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the primary radiotherapy (RT) consumption in a population of almost one million inhabitants, served by one RT centre. Primary RT was defined as being planned, started or finished within 4-6 months of diagnosis. Application was evaluated according to tumour category, stage and year of diagnosis during three 8-year periods: 1975-1982, 1983 -1990 and 1991-1998.

RESULTS

Most patients were between 60 and 75 years. The number of patients receiving primary RT increased with 3% annually over the whole studied period, but remained proportionally stable for males at 30% and decreased for females from 36.2 to 34.6%. A decrease of referral rates for patients with gynaecological cancer was observed. The introduction of breast-conserving therapy in 1981 and of population screening for women aged 50-69 years in 1992 led to a considerable increase of primary RT. The eightfold increase in number of irradiated patients with localised prostate cancer rather reflected a higher detection rate than an increased referral rate. Except for an important increase of irradiated patients with rectal cancer, largely due to the shift to preoperative RT since 1994, and of patients with brain cancer, only slight alterations in referral rates were observed for the other cancers.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of primary RT remained proportionally steady and modest. The marked increase in workload was mainly due to more and earlier detection of breast and prostate cancer and treatment changes in rectal cancer. Decreases were observed for each of the gynecological cancers.

Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for gynecologic carcinoma: part I--malignancies of the cervix, ovary, vagina and vulva

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy usage rates exhibit wide variations both within and between countries. Current estimates of the proportion of cancer patients who should optimally receive radiotherapy are based either on expert opinion or on the measurement of actual usage rates rather than on the best available scientific evidence.

METHODS

With the goal of developing an evidence-based benchmark for radiotherapy use in the treatment of malignancies of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and ovary (endometrial malignancies are covered in a separate article), the authors reviewed international evidence-based treatment guidelines. Optimal radiotherapy usage trees were constructed, and proportions of patients with clinical indications for radiotherapy were obtained from epidemiologic data. These ideal usage rates were compared with actual radiotherapy utilization rates recorded in Australia and elsewhere.

RESULTS

According to the best available evidence, radiotherapy is indicated at least once for 58% of patients with cervical carcinoma, 4% of patients with ovarian carcinoma, 100% of patients with vaginal carcinoma, and 34% of patients with vulvar carcinoma. A review of the limited data available suggests that actual radiotherapy usage rates for patients with gynecologic malignancies are comparable to optimal usage rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Actual practice appears to approximate the authors' model of optimal radiotherapy use. This finding reflects the high level of agreement among treatment guidelines as well as the existence of high-quality evidence related to the management of gynecologic malignancies, and it may also be indicative of the fact that a large proportion of patients are treated in specialist units. The management of gynecologic malignancies may serve as a good example in the development of management strategies for other types of cancer.

Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for gynecologic carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy utilization rates for cancer vary widely, both within and between countries. Current estimates of the proportion of cancer patients who should optimally receive radiotherapy are based either on expert opinion or on the measurement of actual utilization rates, rather than on the best scientific evidence.

METHODS

Evidence-based treatment guidelines regarding endometrial carcinoma were reviewed to develop an evidence-based benchmark for radiotherapy utilization. An optimal radiotherapy utilization tree was constructed and the proportions of endometrial carcinoma patients with clinical indications for radiotherapy were obtained from epidemiologic data. The ideal utilization rates were compared with actual radiotherapy utilization rates for endometrial carcinoma both in Australia and internationally.

RESULTS

According to the best available evidence, radiotherapy is indicated at least once in 46% of all patients with endometrial carcinoma. A review of the limited data available concerning actual radiotherapy utilization rates revealed that the actual rates are approximately 10% lower than the optimal rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research into the patterns of actual treatment and the development of optimal chemotherapy and surgery utilization rates for endometrial carcinoma is recommended. The difference between the optimal and the actual utilization rates warrants investigation into the reasons for the low radiotherapy utilization rates encountered in clinical practice.

Estimation of an optimal radiotherapy utilization rate for gastrointestinal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy utilization rates for cancer vary widely, both within and between countries. The optimal proportion of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who should receive at least one course of radiotherapy at some time during their illness is an important benchmark.

METHODS

The authors studied treatment guidelines and treatment reviews to identify the indications for radiotherapy for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Optimal radiotherapy utilization trees were constructed to show the clinical attributes of patients with gastrointestinal carcinomas who will benefit from radiotherapy. Epidemiologic incidence data for each of these clinical attributes were obtained to calculate the optimal proportion of all patients with gastrointestinal malignancies for whom radiotherapy was considered appropriate. Optimal rates of radiotherapy use were compared with actual rates in population-based studies to assess any discrepancies between actual and optimal radiotherapy utilization rates.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy was indicated in 80% of patients with esophageal carcinoma, 68% of patients with gastric carcinoma, 57% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, 13% of patients with carcinoma of the gallbladder, 0% of patients with hepatic carcinoma, 14% of patients with colon carcinoma, and 61% of patients with rectal carcinoma. The actual radiotherapy utilization rates for most of these gastrointestinal malignancies fell well short of optimal rates, which were derived from evidence-based treatment guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to model optimal radiotherapy utilization using published treatment guidelines and existing incidence data. There was a discrepancy between the optimal and actual rates of radiotherapy utilization for patients with carcinomas of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and rectum. Strategies to implement evidence-based clinical guidelines are recommended.