2074 Increased risk of radiation pneumonitis in breast cancer patients treated by concomitant taxol and radiation therapy

Postmastectomy intensity modulation radiated therapy of chest wall and regional nodes: Retrospective analysis of the performance and complications up for 5 years

To retrospectively evaluate the performance and complications of postmastectomy intensity modulation radiated therapy (IMRT) technique.From January 2010 to December 2014, IMRT technique was applied to 200 patients after modified radical mastectomy. The acute and late radiation toxicities have been followed up for 5 years. The treatment performance, toxicity incidence, and risk factors were investigated.All patients included had at least 1-year of follow-up; mean follow-up was 28.5 months. Three patients had grade 3 acute radiation dermatitis; 1 patient received grade 2 acute radiation induced lung injury, while 3 patients received acute radiation esophagitis. Seven patients had edema at the end of radiotherapy. Multivariate analyses revealed that neoadjuvant chemotherapy and hypertension were the most significant risk factors for acute skin dermatitis and acute radiation induced lung injury, respectively. Trastuzumab treatment was the independent risk factor for late radiation lung injury. Internal mammary nodes irradiation might relate to acute and late radiation induced lung injury. In the follow-ups there were 125 patients that were followed up with for >2 years. The 2-year local-regional recurrence (LRR), distant metastasis (DM), and disease free survival (DFS) were 1.6%, 6.4%, and 92.80%, respectively.Postmastectomy treatment with the IMRT technique can reduce the incidence rate of radiation toxicity by decreasing organs at risk (OARs) irradiation. Patients with risk factors for radiation toxicity should be strictly surveyed throughout radiotherapy.

Preoperative twice-weekly paclitaxel with concurrent radiation therapy followed by surgery and postoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: a phase I/II trial

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemotherapy is the conventional primary treatment in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). We investigated the safety and efficacy of primary twice-weekly paclitaxel and concurrent radiation (RT) before modified radical mastectomy followed by adjuvant doxorubicin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stage IIB (T3N0) to III LABC patients were eligible. Primary chemoradiation consisted of paclitaxel, 30 mg/m(2) delivered intravenously for 1 hour twice weekly for a total of 8 to 10 weeks, and concurrent RT (45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction). Modified radical mastectomy was performed at least 2 weeks after completion of chemoradiation or on recovery of skin toxicity. Postoperatively, patients who responded to paclitaxel and RT received four cycles of doxorubicin/paclitaxel, whereas patients who did not respond received doxorubicin/cytoxan.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were accrued. Toxicity from paclitaxel/RT included grade 3 skin desquamation (7%), hypersensitivity (2%), and stomatitis (2%). Postsurgery complications occurred in six patients (14%). The only grade 4 toxicity of postmastectomy chemotherapy was hematologic (10%). Grade 3 toxicities were leukopenia (24%), infection (22%), peripheral neuropathy (17%), arthralgia and pain (17%), stomatitis (12%), fatigue (10%), esophagitis (5%), and nausea (2%). Overall clinical response rate to preoperative paclitaxel and RT was 91%. Thirty-four percent of patients achieved a pathologic response in the mastectomy specimen: 16% pathologic complete responses (clearance of invasive cancer in the breast and axillary contents) and 18% pathologic partial responses (< 10 residual microscopic foci of invasive breast cancer).

CONCLUSION

Twice-weekly paclitaxel with concurrent RT is a feasible and effective primary treatment for LABC. Future studies should compare primary chemoradiation to chemotherapy in LABC.

Predictors for pneumonitis during locoregional radiotherapy in high-risk patients with breast carcinoma treated with high-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue

BACKGROUND

To study the predictive value of serial pulmonary function testing (PFT) for toxicity in patients who have received high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) and stem-cell rescue for breast carcinoma. These patients are at risk of developing therapy-related pneumonitis (TRP) during or after radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients who received induction chemotherapy (CT) and consolidation HDCT (cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, carmustine) underwent serial PFTs before induction CT, after HDCT, and before locoregional RT. The rate of TRP, i.e., pulmonary complications of Grade 2 or higher (World Health Organization classification), was studied during and 2 months after RT. We analyzed the time-course of changes in the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) and forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV(1)) and studied the differences between patients who developed TRP and those who did not.

RESULTS

The incidence of TRP was 46%. There were marked reductions in DLCO and FEV(1) at the time of RT compared with baseline (Wilcoxon signed rank test: P < 0.001). However, pre-RT PFT values did not predict subsequent development of TRP. Instead, the ratio of pre-RT DLCO to the minimum post- HDCT DLCO, i.e., trend of improvement, predicted the development of TRP in patients (logistic regression analysis: P = 0.048). At a cutoff level of 1, the positive and negative predictive values for this ratio were 61% and 87%, respectively. There was an association between this ratio and a longer interval between HDCT and RT (Spearman rank correlation: P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the directional trend of DLCO after HDCT, i.e., no recovery from nadir values, is a predictor for TRP. TRP patients have a shorter median interval between HDCT and RT than asymptomatic patients. To minimize the occurrence of TRP, one should consider either delaying RT beyond 2 months following carmustine-based HDCT to allow the PFTs to partly recover, or confirm apositive directional trend for improvement of DLCO at the start of RT compared to the post-HDCT nadir value.

Early response of lung in breast cancer irradiation: radiologic density changes measured by CT and symptomatic radiation pneumonitis

PURPOSE

To quantify radiologic changes in the lung with CT after radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) and to study their association with treatment techniques and symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

CT scans of the lungs were performed before and 4 months after RT in 121 BC patients treated with four different RT techniques. The changes in mean density (MDCs) were analyzed at two lung levels (i.e., the central and apical CT slice). The central CT slice was also analyzed with respect to the MDCs in the anterior third and anterior half of the ipsilateral lung area. In mastectomized patients who received chest wall RT with an en-face electron beam, the maximal depths for a range of isodose curves were measured. The occurrence of mild/moderate symptomatic RP was assessed prospectively 1, 4, and 7 months after RT. Data on covariates with potential confounding effect on RT-induced lung toxicity were also collected prospectively.

RESULTS

In the entire study population, an association between the MDCs in the anterior third of the central CT slice and treatment technique (p <0.001) and symptomatic RP (p <0.001) was found. Among patients with chest wall treatment consisting of an en-face electron beam, the MDCs of the anterior third of the central CT slice correlated with the 35% isodose curve (16-30 Gy) (p = 0.046) and age (p <0.001). No association between post-RT lung density changes and pre-RT chemotherapy, concurrent tamoxifen intake, or smoking habits was found. Among patients treated with locoregional RT, an association was found between the MDCs in the anterior third of the central CT slice and the incidence of RP. MDCs in the apical CT slice, however, were not associated with RP.

CONCLUSION

The results imply that short-term post-RT lung density changes and symptomatic RP were associated with RT techniques, total doses as low as 16-30 Gy, and increasing age. Structural changes in the central part of lung appeared to be more important for the development of RP than changes in the apex.

Technical factors associated with radiation pneumonitis after local +/- regional radiation therapy for breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of, and clinical factors associated with, symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) after tangential breast/chest wall irradiation with or without regional lymph node treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The records of 613 patients irradiated with tangential photon fields for breast cancer with >6 months follow-up were reviewed. Clinically significant RP was defined as the presence of new pulmonary symptoms requiring steroids. Data on clinical factors previously reported to be associated with RP were collected, e.g., tamoxifen or chemotherapy exposure and age. The central lung distance (CLD) and the average of the superior and inferior mid lung distance (ALD) in the lateral tangential field were measured on simulator films as a surrogate for irradiated lung volume. Many patients were treated with partly wide tangential fields that included a heart block shielding a part of the lower lung.

RESULTS

RP developed in 15/613 (2.4%) patients. In the univariate analysis, there was an increased incidence of RP among patients treated with local-regional radiotherapy (RT) (4.1%) vs. those receiving local RT only (0.9%) (p = 0.02), and among patients receiving chemotherapy (3.9%) vs. those not treated with chemotherapy (1.4%) (p = 0.06). According to multivariate analysis, only the use of nodal RT remained independently associated with RP (p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant association between ranked CLD or ALD measurements and RP among patients treated with nodal irradiation with tangential beams. However, there was a statistically nonsignificant trend for increasing rates of RP with grouped ALD values: below 2 cm (4% RP rate), between 2 and 3 cm (6%), and above 3 cm (14%).

CONCLUSIONS

RP was an uncommon complication, both with local and local-regional RT. The addition of regional lymph node irradiation slightly increased the incidence of RP among patients treated with the partly wide tangential field technique. Concern for RP should, however, not deter patients with node-positive breast cancer from receiving local-regional RT.

Pulmonary complications following different radiotherapy techniques for breast cancer, and the association to irradiated lung volume and dose

PURPOSE

This study investigates the incidence of short-term pulmonary complications following radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) with different treatment techniques/incidentally irradiated lung volumes and the importance of confounding factors on RT-induced pulmonary complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospectively, 475 patients with BC were followed for pulmonary complications 1, 4 and 7 months post-RT. Mean lung dose volume histograms (MDVH) were constructed and compared for the different RT-techniques. Among a subset of the mastectomized patients treated with loco-regional (LR-) RT, who had undergone complete three-dimensional (3-D) dose planning (n = 43), MDVH for asymptomatic patients was compared with MDVH for patients experiencing both radiological and clinical pulmonary side-effects.

RESULTS

Moderate pulmonary complications, that is requiring treatment with corticosteroids, were rare following local RT (< 1%), but were diagnosed among 11% of the patients treated with LR-RT. A correlation between increasing irradiated lung volumes at the >20 Gy-level (V20), based on MDVH for the RT-techniques, and pulmonary complications was found (P < 0.001). Furthermore, increasing age and reduced pre-RT functional level were independently associated with a higher rate of pulmonary complications (P = 0.005 and P = 0.018). Among the subgroup of mastectomized patients treated with LR-RT, who had undergone complete 3-D dose planning, a difference in mean V20 was found between patients experiencing both clinical and radiological pulmonary side-effects compared to patients experiencing neither of the two side-effects (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Moderate pulmonary complications following local RT for BC are rare. The incidence of short-term moderate pulmonary complications in LR-RT is, however, clinically significant and to define quality assurance guidelines for these RT-techniques, 3-D RT planning can be used.

Postmastectomy radiotherapy: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

OBJECTIVE

To determine indications for the use of postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) for patients with invasive breast cancer with involved axillary lymph nodes or locally advanced disease who receive systemic therapy. These guidelines are intended for use in the care of patients outside of clinical trials.

POTENTIAL INTERVENTION

The benefits and risks of PMRT in such patients, as well as subgroups of these patients, were considered. The details of the PMRT technique were also evaluated.

OUTCOMES

The outcomes considered included freedom from local-regional recurrence, survival (disease-free and overall), and long-term toxicity.

EVIDENCE

An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through July 2000; certain investigators were contacted for more recent and, in some cases, unpublished information. A computerized search was performed of MEDLINE data; directed searches based on the bibliographies of primary articles were also performed.

VALUES

Levels of evidence and guideline grades were assigned by the Panel using standard criteria. A "recommendation" was made when level I or II evidence was available and there was consensus as to its meaning. A "suggestion" was made based on level III, IV, or V evidence and there was consensus as to its meaning. Areas of clinical importance were pointed out where guidelines could not be formulated due to insufficient evidence or lack of consensus.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations, suggestions, and expert opinions of the Panel are described in this article.

VALIDATION

Seven outside reviewers, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee members, and the ASCO Board of Directors reviewed this document.