Dynamic digital traction for unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

A Review on Volar Fracture-Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

Volar fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint are rare injuries caused by an axial force on a flexed digit resulting in an avulsion fracture of the dorsal lip of the middle phalanx with volar dislocation of the joint. This volar subtype is analogous to the more common dorsal subtype with a mirror image fracture on the dorsal lip of the middle phalanx. The main significance in this type of injury lies in the disruption of the extensor mechanism at the central slip. The goals of treatment, apart from restoring a congruent and stable joint, is to restore the extensor mechanism to prevent a boutonnière deformity. In this article, we summarise the current literature and discuss the principles for treatment of this uncommon injury. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).

Arthroplasty for destroyed proximal interphalangeal joint in hand trauma surgery: Silicone hinged NeuFlex® or gliding Tactys®?

The treatment of proximal interphalangeal joints (PIP) after a traumatic injury has produced disappointing outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the functional results of emergency hinged or gliding arthroplasty for destroyed PIP joints. A two-center retrospective study was carried out in 24 patients with open and closed trauma of the PIP joint of the fingers from 2007 to 2019. Fifteen hinged silicone implants (NeuFlex®) and nine gliding implants (Tactys®) were used. Pain on a visual analog scale (VAS), stability and total active motion (TAM), grip and pinch strength (Jamar®), QuickDASH and PRWE and satisfaction were assessed, and X-rays were performed. With a mean follow-up of 48 months, 24 patients aged 58 years on average were reviewed. Pain on VAS was 0.2/10, the TAM was 72% of the contralateral side, the QuickDASH was 15.6/100 and the PRWE was 24.5/100. PIP flexion was ≥50% of the contralateral side in 75% of patients. PIP and DIP extensor lag of 9° was significantly larger with the Tactys® than with the NeuFlex®, with no significant difference in the TAM. Three clinodactylies in fingers with the NeuFlex® and three reducible swanneck deformities in fingers with the Tactys® were noted. Three-quarters of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the outcome. Emergency PIP arthroplasty with Tactys® seems to provide functional results that are as good as with NeuFlex®. Clinodactyly was found with NeuFlex® use. A significant PIP and IPD extensor lag of 9° and swan-neck deformities were found with Tactys® without significant functional impairment.

Volar plating versus external fixation for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

We retrospectively compared the results of volar plating and dynamic external fixation for acute unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint with a depressed fragment. We treated 31 patients (31 fingers), 12 with volar buttress plating and 19 with dynamic external fixation. Follow-up averaged 35 and 40 months in the two groups, with a minimal 6-month follow-up. Average active flexion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 95° after plate fixation and 87° after external fixation, with an active extension lag of -6° and -9°, respectively. Active flexion at the distal interphalangeal joint averaged 67° in the plate group and 58° in the external fixation group, with active extension lags of 0° and -5°, respectively. We conclude that both methods can obtain a good range of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint. A limitation of the extension of the distal interphalangeal joint occurred with dynamic external fixation but not with volar buttress plating.Level of evidence: IV.

Surgical Management of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture-Dislocations: A Review of Outcomes

Background: Treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations is difficult given the potential long-term complications of the involved finger and entire hand. Several surgical methods have been utilized for management of these injuries, none of which have shown consistently favorable results. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report the post-operative outcomes of multiple treatment modalities for PIPJ fracture-dislocations in various studies. Methods: A literature review of PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for all articles on PIPJ fracture-dislocations. Outcomes of interest included PIPJ range of motion, grip strength (% of contralateral hand), and quick disabilities of arm, shoulder, hand (QuickDASH). Articles were distributed into 5 groups by surgical method: open reduction, percutaneous fixation, dynamic external fixation, extension-block pinning, and hemi-hamate arthroplasty. Results: Forty-eight of 1679 total screened articles were included. The weighted means of post-operative range of motion (ROM; degrees) at final follow-up were open reduction 84.7 (n = 146), percutaneous fixation 86.5 (n = 32), dynamic external fixation 81.7 (n = 389), extension-block pinning 83.6 (n = 85), and hemi-hamate arthroplasty 79.3 (n = 52). Dorsal fracture-dislocations, regardless of surgical method, had an average ROM of 83.2 (n = 321), grip strength 91% (n = 132), and QuickDASH of 6.6 (n = 59) while pilon injuries had an average ROM of 80.2 (n = 48), grip strength 100% (n = 13), and QuickDASH of 11.4 (n = 13). Conclusion: Percutaneous fixation yielded the highest post-operative ROM at final follow-up while extension-block pinning resulted in the greatest grip strength. While dorsal fracture-dislocations produced higher average ROM and lower QuickDASH score, pilon fractures produced a higher grip strength. No treatment method or fracture type yielded consistently better outcomes than another.

An Evidence-Based Guide for Managing Phalangeal Fractures

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe treatment options for phalangeal fractures. 2. Choose an appropriate fracture management plan that optimizes patient goals and range of motion. 3. Describe closed and open reduction techniques of commonly encountered phalangeal fracture patterns.

SUMMARY

Phalangeal fractures are the second most common upper extremity fracture. Although many can be treated with splinting, operative intervention may be required for unstable fracture patterns and those involving the articular surface. Failure to appropriately treat these fractures can result in finger stiffness, loss in range of motion, and functional deficits. The type of fixation method can range from percutaneous pinning to open reduction and internal fixation. This article presents a series of cases to illustrate the appropriate management of phalangeal fractures using an evidence-based approach.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Unstable Complex Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fracture Management Using the Ligamentotaxor® Device: A Case Series of 33 Cases

Background and objective

Fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) of the hand have always been difficult to treat, often leading to less than satisfactory outcomes. The use of dynamic external fixator devices to treat these fractures is well established and it is based on the philosophy of minimal soft tissue injury and early joint mobilization. There has been a wide variety in their designs, surgical technique, and reported outcomes. This study aimed to report the long-term outcome following the use of the Ligamentotaxor® device (Ligamentotaxor1, ArexTM, Palaiseau, France) in treating fractures of the PIPJ of the hand.

Methods

Between 2009 and 2018, 33 patients treated in our institution with Ligamentotaxor® for fractures of the PIPJ were followed up for a minimum period of 12 months. Radiographs and clinical records were reviewed for clinical and functional outcomes including finger range of motion (ROM), union, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and any complications.

Results

A total of 33 patients completed a minimum follow-up of 12 months (mean: 27.5 months). All fractures showed radiological union at a mean of 33 days. Surgery was performed within a mean of 8.9 days and surgical operating time averaged 23.7 minutes. Devices were removed at a mean of 33 days. At the end of the follow-up, the mean range of flexion was 66 degrees and the mean extension lag was six degrees. The mean QuickDASH score was 8.72. Of note, 85% of the patients experienced no limitations in their daily activities, while 35% reported pain on exertion. One patient had a pin tract infection. Four patients had cold intolerance and persistent swelling.

Conclusion

The results of the use of Ligamentotaxor® in this series are comparable to those of other dynamic external fixator devices reported in the literature. Thanks to its quick and easy surgical technique, the device provides an appealing option for the management of PIPJ fractures.

Management of intraarticular proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations and pilon fractures with the Ligamentotaxor® device

INTRODUCTION

Fracture-dislocation and pilon injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJ) continue to pose significant management challenges. Stable fracture configurations can be treated with extension block splinting or pinning. Unstable fractures usually require open or closed reduction and fixation either directly/internally onto the fracture using Kirschner wires, cerclage wires, screws or miniplates or indirectly/externally by ligamentotaxis using external fixators which can be dynamic or static. Dynamic external fixators, such as Suzuki's pins and rubber traction system, S-Quattro and Hynes/Giddins frame, appear intuitive as they provide axial distraction, which reduces the fracture whilst obviating the need to open the fracture. They also allow immediate active movement whilst maintaining reduction. The Ligamentotaxor® (Arex, Pallaiseau Cedex, France) is a commercially-available dynamic external fixator which has been used at our institution since 2013.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assessed the outcomes (interphalangeal joint active range of movement (AROM), QuickDASH score and complications) in 19 patients [mean age of 48.6 (SD 16.2)] whose proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) fracture-dislocations and/or pilon fractures were treated with the Ligamentotaxor®. Injuries were classified according to Seno i.e. (1) volar lip fracture ± dorsal dislocation (2) dorsal lip fracture ± volar dislocation (3) pilon fracture.

RESULTS

There were fifteen (79%) pilon/Seno 3, three (16%) Seno 1 and one (5%) Seno 2 fractures. The mean PIPJ AROM was 70.6° (SD 4.48°) for all Seno classes and 70° (SD 5.6°) for the pilon subgroup. The QuickDASH score averaged to 2.65 (SD 0.88). There were two pin-site infections, three pin-site inflammations, one osteomyelitis and two complex regional pain syndrome diagnoses. One patient required arthroplasty after missing several appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

These results, considering the predominance of pilon fractures, compare favourably the published Ligamentotaxor® and other dynamic external fixator systems.

The Importance of Restoring Anatomy of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint in Dorsal Fracture Dislocations

The proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) is a complex anatomical structure. In managing fracture dislocations about the PIPJ, the aim is to restore a congruent joint that allows for smooth gliding motion. Detailed knowledge of the anatomy and biomechanics of the PIPJ is necessary in managing these injuries with predictable success. The breadth of techniques previously described in the treatment of such injuries is testament to the difficulties faced in achieving optimal clinical and radiological outcomes. In this article we detail the anatomy and biomechanics of the PIPJ and summarize current literature and principles for the treatment of dorsal fracture dislocations.

An investigation of the acute management of closed intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint in Ireland

Purpose

Many treatment methods for intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint are described in the literature without a consensus on the most effective approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the methods of treatment of PIP joint fractures being used by trauma surgeons in the Republic of Ireland currently and the timing of referral to therapy.

Design/methodology/approach

A cross-sectional descriptive study methodology was used to survey trauma surgeons, occupational therapists and physiotherapists in Ireland. An online platform was used. A total of 21 surveys were returned by surgeons and 37 by therapists. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to present the results.

Findings

Buddy strapping was reported as the primary treatment method for stable PIP joint fractures. All levels of fracture severity were reported to be treated using traction constructs, which include static and dynamic fixation and orthoses. Unstable fractures were managed using open reduction with internal fixation by 50 per cent of surgeons. Early timing of referral to therapy is reported by more surgeons than therapists. The majority of therapists indicated that they did not have the resources to see patients at the optimal time.

Originality/value

To the authors’ knowledge, this study provides the first description of the management of PIP joint fractures across the Irish health service. The findings of this study suggest that additional therapy resources are required within the health service executive to facilitate the desired early referral to therapy and to enable service development for this category of hand fractures.

Injuries Around the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

Proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) injuries are common and challenging to treat, involving a spectrum of conditions ranging from isolated ligamentous injuries to severe fracture dislocations. The main goal of treatment is to achieve a congruent, stable joint, which is key to achieving early range of motion and a favorable outcome. Injuries that do not compromise the stability of the joint may be treated nonsurgically, whereas those that render the joint unstable may be managed with one of many surgical strategies available. This article focuses on the current practices of treatment of injuries around the PIPJ.

Use of a Multivector Mandibular Distractor for Treatment of Pediatric Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Pilon Fractures: A Case-Based Review

Background

The difficulties in surgical treatment of pilon fractures of the finger include fragment reconstitution and posthealing stiffness. In adults, external fixation with traction and early active range of motion (AROM)/passive range of motion (PROM) during healing is considered necessary for avoiding joint stiffness and attaining realignment. The authors present a unique approach to pediatric pilon fractures that uses open reduction and multivector external fixation with delayed AROM/PROM. Initial immobilization and significant traction allowed for joint realignment and prevented noncompliance with staged distraction. The authors believe this immobilization leads to a superior outcome because, unlike adults, children tend to avoid stiffness and a larger distraction force allowed for sufficient joint realignment to regain range of motion (ROM).

Methods

A right-handed 13-year-old boy sustained a right ring finger fracture and presented 12 days later. Radiographs revealed a comminuted Salter-Harris 4 fracture of the middle phalanx. The patient underwent open reduction and placement of multivector external fixation using a pediatric mandibular distractor/fixator. Significant traction was applied to distract the finger to length.

Results

Hardware was removed 6 weeks postoperatively and AROM was initiated after splinting. The patient started PROM 8 weeks postoperatively. Strengthening was initiated 2 weeks later. ROM improved and rehabilitation was continued. The patient exhibited nearly equal grip strength 12 weeks postoperatively. At 14 months follow-up, radiographs showed complete healing and joint realignment. There was no deformity or pain and finger length was restored.

Conclusion

Management of pediatric pilon fractures is rarely described and presents unique considerations. Early-stage traction and immobilization using a multivector mandibular fixator/distractor is suitable in a child because noncompliance is avoided and there is a decreased risk for stiffness. Combining early immobilization with subsequent-staged AROM, PROM, and strengthening resulted in no loss of ROM and maintained articular symmetry.

Complications of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries: Prevention and Treatment

Proximal interphalangeal joint injuries are one of the most common injuries of the hand. The severity of injury can vary from a minor sprain to a complex intra-articular fracture. Because of the complex anatomy of the joint, complications may occur even after an appropriate treatment. This article provides a comprehensive review on existing techniques to manage complications and imparts practical points to help prevent further complications after proximal interphalangeal joint injury.

A scoping review of applications and outcomes of traction orthoses and constructs for the management of intra-articular fractures and fracture dislocations in the hand

INTRODUCTION

Intra-articular hand fractures can have devastating consequences for movement and function. The unique nature of the injury and diverse management strategies are a challenge for conducting trials.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To conduct a scoping review of traction constructs for the management of intra-articular hand fractures.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature, extracting data on the scope and nature of the evidence for traction constructs.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 87 articles addressing 3 traction constructs: (1) static traction (n = 17), (2) dynamic external fixation (n = 53), and (3) dynamic orthoses (n = 17). Active range of motion of the target joint was the most frequently reported outcome. Study designs included 36 cohorts, 21 case series, and 9 case studies: 24% contained only technical information.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature addressing traction constructs consists primarily of small and low-quality studies. Evidence synthesis could improve the estimation of range of motion outcomes but would not be able to identify the best treatment. Consensus on classification of fracture patterns, routine use of outcome measures, and randomized trials are needed to compare different traction constructs and inform evidence-based care.

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A.

The use of dynamic external fixation in the treatment of dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures of finger proximal interphalangeal joints

The aim of this study was to review the outcome of the treatment of finger proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture subluxations and pilon fractures with a modified external fixator. We treated 36 patients (36 fingers). We assessed the ranges of motion and patient satisfaction. At final follow-up, 23 patients had no pain; 11 had pain in the cold; and two also had mild pain. None had moderate or severe pain. The mean range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion was 86° (60°-100°). The mean total active range of finger motion was 244° (range 200°-265°). This system is simple, cheap and relatively easily applied. It gives stable fixation that allows early mobilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Dynamic External Fixation for Complex Intraarticular Phalangeal Fractures

Intraarticular phalangeal fractures are difficult to treat. The advantages of using dynamic external fixation devices include distraction of impacted fracture fragments and reduction in joint stiffness by allowing early joint mobilization. Previous reports have concentrated on pilon fractures and dorsal fracture dislocations affecting the proximal interphalangeal joint. We report our experience using a dynamic external spring fixator in the management of 15 patients with a variety of fracture patterns affecting the metacarpophalangeal, proximal interphalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. In three cases the device spanned two adjacent joints. Long-term follow-up has shown excellent range of joint movement and no major complications. We consider that this device is an effective tool in the management of a range on complex intraarticular phalangeal fractures.

Lessons Learned from the Management of Complex Intra-Articular Fractures at the Base of the Middle Phalanges of Fingers

The use of dynamic traction splintage is established in the treatment of complex intra-articular phalangeal fractures. Several different systems have been used and we report our experience with one of these, the Pins and Rubber Traction System. A cohort of 14 patients with complex intra-articular fractures at the base of the middle phalanges of the fingers were treated and assessed prospectively over a 2.5-year period (mean, 20 months; range, 7–28 months). The mean active range of motion regained, at the proximal interphalangeal joint, was 74° (range, 0–100°). The mean total active motion of the injured digit was 196° (range, 40–275°). Refinements in the regime are suggested as a result of this investigation.

The Use of a Simple Dynamic External Fixator for the Treatment of Volar Fracture Subluxation of Proximal Interphalangeal Joints of the Fingers

Volar fracture dislocation is very uncommon, with few series reported in the literature. Patients with such injuries were treated by modified dynamic external fixators. The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 6 to 92 mo). The mean range of interphalangeal (proximal interphalangeal) joints and distal interphalangeal joints were 90 and 74 degrees, respectively. The total active range of motion (TAM) was excellent (256 degrees). The mean quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 1.2. The advantages of our external fixators are that they are simple, cheap, adjustable, and allow immediate range of motion.

The S-Quattro in the Management of Acute Intraarticular Phalangeal Fractures of the Hand

Intraarticular phalangeal fractures of the hand are difficult and challenging to manage. Dynamic external fixation devices offer the advantages of allowing distraction of the impacted fracture and early joint mobilization. We present our study of 100 patients with a variety of fractures who were treated with the S-Quattro technique over a 6-year period, with an average follow-up of 10.5 months. The mean active range of motion regained was 92° for proximal interphalangeal joints (81 fractures), 82° for distal interphalangeal joints (10 fractures), 91° for metacarpophalangeal joints (6 fractures) and 80° for interphalangeal joints of the thumb (3 fractures). Only nine patients complained of mild or moderate pain. Postoperative radiographic appearances were satisfactory in all but five out of the 100 patients. This device is a simple and effective technique for the management of these difficult fractures. It offers advantages in terms of versatility, ease of application, good tolerance by patients, few complications and good outcome.

Dorsal Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Treated by Open Reduction and Interfragmentary Screw Fixation: Indications, Approaches and Results

Many operative and non-operative treatments of dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalageal (PIP) joint have been described. Return of good joint function requires anatomical reduction of the articular fragments and restoration of joint congruity and a stable functional arc of motion, with the fixation construct stable enough for early mobilization. To prevent recurrent dorsal subluxation, the attachments of the ligamentous palmar restraints and the bony buttress provided by the palmar lip of the middle phalanx base must be restored. Open reduction and internal interfragmentary screw fixation using 1.5 or 1.3 mm screws was employed in 12 fingers in 10 patients with unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joints of Schenck grades III and IV. At an average follow-up of 8.7 months, all patients in this series achieved good to excellent results and an average total active interphalangeal motion of 132° (range 105°–165°). Additional benefits over non-operative techniques included improved patient comfort and simplified nursing care and therapy supervision.

Dorsal Fracture–Dislocation of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: A Comparative Study of Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Fixation Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Nineteen patients with a dorsal fracture–dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint of a finger were treated with either closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation (eight cases) or open reduction and internal fixation, using either one or two lag screws (six cases) or a cerclage wire (five cases). At a mean follow-up of 7 (range 6–9) years, most patients reported satisfactory finger function, even though some of the injuries healed with proximal interphalangeal joint incongruency (seven cases) or subluxation (four cases). Those treated by open reduction complained of more “loss of feeling” in the affected finger and those specifically treated by cerclage wire fixation reported more cold intolerance and had a significantly larger fixed flexion deformity (median, 30°: range 18–38°) and a smaller arc of motion (median, 48°: range 45–60°) at the proximal interphalangeal joint, despite having the best radiological outcomes. Closed reduction and transarticular Kirschner wire fixation produced satisfactory results, with none of the eight patients experiencing significant persistent symptoms despite a reduced arc of proximal interphalangeal joint flexion (median=75°; range 60–108°). The results of this relatively simple treatment appear at least as satisfactory as those obtained by the two techniques of open reduction and internal fixation, both of which were technically demanding.

Extension Block Pinning for Unstable Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Dorsal Fracture Dislocations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of extension block pinning used to treat unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. The factors affecting the functional outcome were analyzed.

METHODS

A series of 53 patients with 55 dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joint treated with closed reduction and extension block pinning were retrospectively reviewed. Additional percutaneous intramedullary fracture reduction (16 cases) or open fracture reduction (4 cases) had been performed. The radiological and clinical evaluations were included.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (range, 1.0-10.6 years), 39 patients with 41 injured fingers were evaluated. The fracture fragments involved 30% to 69% (mean, 50%) of the articular surface of the middle phalanx. The mean range of motion was 80° (range, 35° to 115°) at the PIP joint with a mean extension loss of 6° (range, 0° to 50°) excluding 2 joints that were salvaged with arthrodesis. The mean range of motion of the distal interphalangeal joint was 68° (range, 5° to 90°). The mean visual analog scale for digit pain was 1.5/10. The reduction of the joint was achieved intraoperatively in all cases. However, after the hardware removal, recurrent minimal subluxation was observed in 12 cases (29%). Recurrent subluxation was associated with increased residual pain. The length of follow-up time had a positive correlation, whereas the patient age had a negative correlation with the range of motion of the injured PIP joint.

CONCLUSIONS

The extension block pinning technique is a simple and valuable technique for treating unstable dorsal PIP fracture-dislocation injuries producing satisfactory long-term results.

Delayed treatment of unstable proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations with a dynamic external fixator

BACKGROUND

Fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) remain a challenging problem to treat. Although there are a number of papers describing the use of dynamic external fixators and force couples for treatment of unstable PIPJ fracture-dislocations acutely, the literature is scarce on delayed treatment of PIPJ fracture-dislocations, where malunion of the articular surface may theoretically compromise postoperative range of motion (ROM) at the PIPJ. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of dynamic distraction external fixation (DDEF) for the delayed treatment of PIPJ fracture-dislocations at least 3 weeks after the inciting injury.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients were treated with delayed DDEF between 2010 and 2013. Postoperative ROM at the PIPJ was measured. Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were administered to all patients postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean time from injury to surgery was 27.5 days. The mean follow-up period was 23.7 months (range 10-36). The mean active ROM at the PIPJ on final postoperative follow-up was 83.9° (range 52-100). None of the patients experienced pin-tract infections. Mean DASH score was 3.7+3.4 and mean Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score was 97.3+3.0. All patients returned to work and resumed normal activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed treatment of unstable PIPJ fracture-dislocations with a DDEF is effective in restoring function to the PIPJ. Nascent malunion of the PIPJ articular surface does not compromise postoperative outcomes and the joint surface undergoes remodelling over time to restore a smooth and functional articular surface.

Swing traction versus no-traction for complex intra-articular proximal inter-phalangeal fractures

INTRODUCTION

Traction orthoses are thought to optimize recovery from intra-articular finger fractures by restoring joint space and allowing early motion. Evidence to date has, however, consisted only of case series.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To compare swing traction versus no-traction management of complex fractures of proximal inter-phalangeal (PIP) finger joints. We hypothesized that there is no long-term (i.e. >12 month) difference between swing traction and no-traction (with or without surgical fixation) in terms of motion, pain, function, patient satisfaction, or treatment cost.

METHODS

Adults with a history of complex PIP fractures affecting ≥30% of articular surface injury were identified from database searches at three public hospitals and a private clinic and invited to participate. X-rays taken at the time of injury were graded by two blinded assessors, and participants attended a clinic for measurement of range of motion (ROM) and self-reported function, pain, and satisfaction at least one year post injury. Participant data were then were grouped by treatment provided. One group (N = 17) was treated with swing traction and the other group (N = 14) had no-traction. The primary outcome was combined motion of the PIP and distal inter-phalangeal (DIP) joints, expressed as both total active motion and Strickland score. Secondary outcomes were physical function and symptoms as measured by the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), patient satisfaction, pain, complication rates, and cost of treatment, based on mean resource consumption per group.

RESULTS

Patients treated with swing traction had greater finger motion than those in the no-traction group, which was statistically and clinically significant. There were no differences in patient ratings of function, pain or satisfaction. Complications, such as swan-neck deformity, cold sensitivity, malunion, infection, or adhesions occurred in over half of both groups of participants. During the treatment phase, the swing traction group attended hand therapy an average of 13.3 times, and the no-traction group attended 11.7 times. Average costs for swing traction were less than for surgical fixation with no-traction.

DISCUSSION

The significantly different range of motion found in our study did not translate to better DASH scores. The DASH is designed to measure global upper limb physical functioning and symptoms, but lacks sensitivity in populations with finger injuries.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with the swing traction protocol had greater range of motion in the finger, however this did not translate to improved patient ratings of function, pain or satisfaction. A basic cost comparison indicated that swing traction may be less expensive than other forms of surgical repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint: evaluation of closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in acute dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint.

METHODS

Eight men and one woman were treated with closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning by one orthopaedic surgeon. The ring finger was injured in six patients, the small finger in two patients and the middle finger in one patient. The mean joint surface involvement was 36 % (range, 26-49 %). The Kirschner wires were removed after an average of 28 days (range, 24-37 days).

RESULTS

All patients demonstrated a painless, but fusiform, swollen PIP joint after a mean follow-up of 6.5 months. The average flexion of the PIP joint was 106° (range, 80-110), and the average extension of the PIP joint was 4° short of full extension (range, 10 hyperextension-15 flexion contracture). All patients had a concentrically reduced PIP joint with a healed fracture on radiographs. Two patients had radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, but were asymptomatic. One patient developed a superficial pin track infection, which quickly resolved with a short course of antibiotics, and avascular necrosis affecting one of the condyles of the proximal phalanx.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previous studies, closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire pinning in dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint is a minimally invasive and simple technique which appears to give satisfactory outcomes in the short to intermediate term.

Factors affecting the functional results of open reduction and internal fixation for fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

To clarify the factors affecting functional results of fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint treated by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), 60 patients, including 38 patients with a dorsal fracture-dislocation and 22 with a pilon fracture, were analysed. The mean ratio of articular surface involvement was 48.5% and a depressed central fragment existed in 75.3% of the cases. ORIF was performed in 47 patients through a lateral approach using Kirschner wires and in 13 through a palmar approach using a plate or screws. The mean flexion, extension and range of motion (ROM) of the PIP joint was 89.5°, 11.5° and 78.0°, respectively. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that a delayed start of active motion exercise after surgery, elderly age and ulnar ray digit were factors affecting functional outcomes. Although ORIF allows accurate restoration of the articular surfaces, an early start of motion exercise is essential for good results.

Modified hemihamate arthroplasty technique for treatment of acute proximal interphalangeal joint fracture-dislocations

We retrospectively reviewed 11 patients who underwent modified hemihamate arthroplasty for the treatment of comminuted dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. This technique was used to minimize the potential risk of complications at the recipient site by volarly oblique osteotomy in the coronal plane at graft harvesting and anatomical repair of the detached flexor sheath. The average joint involvement of the fracture was 58.4%, and the mean duration of follow-up was 38 months. The active range of motion of the distal interphalangeal, PIP, and metacarpophalangeal joint was 80.4, 85.4, and 91.8 degrees, respectively. The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand score was 4.8, and all patients achieved bony union at final follow-up. One patient showed radiographic signs of graft absorption, but this did not limit their daily activities. The modified hemihamate arthroplasty technique is safe and reliable and reduces the risk of iatrogenic damage when used to treat comminuted dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint.

Hand-based swing traction splinting for intra-articular proximal interphalangeal joint fractures

Introduction

Acute intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint have always presented as a difficult injury to manage for the treating surgeon and therapist. Traction management enabling ligamentotaxis and motion is a popular method to manage these injuries. This case series presents the design and results of hand-based swing traction splinting which is less cumbersome for patients than other forms of traction splinting.

Methods

Five patients presenting with intra-articular proximal interphalangeal joint fractures underwent surgery whereby a transverse K-wire was inserted across the middle phalanx. The treating Occupational Therapist fabricated a hand-based swing traction splint to provide a distraction force from the K-wire to the splint. Range of motion and patient satisfaction were the primary outcome measures.

Results

All five patients reported satisfaction with their hand function following therapy involving swing traction splinting. Furthermore, range of motion was comparable to other forms of traction management reported in the literature with an 88° mean arc of motion at the proximal interphalangeal joint.

Conclusion

This case series demonstrates that hand-based swing traction splinting is a viable treatment option for the management of intra-articular proximal interphalangeal joint fractures. With similar outcomes to other forms of distraction that enable early movement, such as the pins and rubber traction system, this design is an alternative. The less cumbersome splint design is the main advantage over other splinting methods that apply distraction whilst also enabling early motion.

Fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint

Fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint encompass a spectrum of injury severity, ranging from injuries that require little intervention to those that require advanced reconstructive surgery for optimal outcome. Three fracture-dislocation patterns are recognized: dorsal, volar, and pilon. Acceptable outcome is dependent on achieving and maintaining a well-aligned and well-reduced joint, re-establishing normal joint kinematics, and restoring motion. Anatomic articular surface reduction is desirable but not absolutely necessary for a good outcome. Treatment depends on both the type of injury and patient-dependent factors. Optimal outcome for a specific injury is predicated on expedient diagnosis and recognition of injury severity, which enables initiation of appropriate management.

Orthotic considerations for dense connective tissue and articular cartilage--the need for optimal movement and stress

Orthotic intervention is an essential component of hand rehabilitation, addressing biological factors that affect activity and participation. Functional, pain-free joint mobility requires skeletal stability, healthy articular cartilage, and appropriate extensibility of periarticular dense connective tissues (DCTs). This article addresses basic science underlying clinical reasoning when considering orthoses to maintain or restore structural integrity, mobility and function of DCT structures, and articular cartilage. However, these tissues often have different and sometimes conflicting requirements for the maintenance and restoration of integrity and health. The duration of immobilization, especially at end range, should be carefully considered, as it impairs nutrition of tissues and adversely compresses articular cartilage, causing injury that may not be reversible. Immobilization also reduces extensibility of DCT. Thus, an intermittent orthotic wearing schedule is suggested, allowing movement wherever possible to promote tissue health. To optimize benefits and minimize harmful effects of orthotic intervention, further research on physiological responses of human tissues to immobilization and tension is needed.

The use of the s-quattro dynamic external fixator for the treatment of intra-articular phalangeal fractures: a review of the literature

Intra-articular phalangeal fractures are a common injury. If left untreated, these injuries can lead to poor functional outcome with severe dehabilitating consequences, especially in younger patients.

The S-Quattro external fixator device (Surgicraft®, UK) can be used to treat such injuries. Its use has been widely documented and has shown many advantages in comparison to other conventional treatments. Advantages include reduced operative time, rigid fixation and early range of motion.

We present a review of the current literature and use of the S-Quattro serpentine system in the management of intraarticular phalangeal fractures.

Open reduction and internal fixation for dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a miniplate

Various operative techniques have been described for unstable dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint with articular involvement. However, this injury still remains a therapeutic challenge for hand surgeons because no single technique guarantees successful outcomes. We performed a novel procedure using a low-profile miniplate, which allows for anatomic reduction, rigid internal fixation, and early finger joint motion. Between March 2003 and May 2009, 18 consecutive patients who suffered from 19 dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIP joint with volar articular fracture of the middle phalanx involving more than 40% of the articular surface were treated using this technique. The postoperative follow-up period averaged 16.6 months (range, 12-18 mo). Bony union was obtained in all cases. No patient showed residual dorsal subluxation. Active motion of the PIP joint averaged 85.0 degrees (range, 62-105 degrees), flexion contracture averaged 5.4 degrees (range, 0-17 degrees), and percent total active interphalangeal joint motion averaged 89.0% (range, 60%-100%). Two patients had restricted active distal interphalangeal joint flexion owing to tendon adhesion resulting from the use of a relatively long plate in the first few cases of this series. No major complications were reported for the other 16 patients. We describe the surgical technique, indications, complications, and postoperative management for this technique.

Patient experience of distraction splinting for complex finger fracture dislocations

The study design is qualitative phenomenological and grounded theory. Intraarticular fractures of the finger joints can severely limit function due to stiffness and pain. Distraction with early movement is thought to deliver the best results and this has been used to treat these types of injuries at The Alfred Hospital for eight years. Qualitative data from patient interviews were used to describe patients' own experiences of treatment with distraction splinting and identify key issues in patient adherence. The key finding was a disconnect between perceived complexity of injury and treatment. Those who adhered with the treatment regime felt that they were well informed of the reasoning behind it. The hand surgery and therapy team must be aware of the patient experience of complex finger injuries and should ensure patients are well supported with education about their injury and treatment. Early preemptive pain control may help optimize adherence to the splint and exercise regime. Findings can be applied to other acute conditions requiring cumbersome splinting and potentially uncomfortable early exercise routines.

The hand arc--a hand-based splint design for intraarticular fractures

When a fracture of the finger is intraarticular in nature, it adds another dimension to the rehabilitation program, as the joint space is affected and subsequently gaining motion can be a challenge. Traction splinting has been reported in the literature as one way to manage intraarticular finger fractures in an attempt to provide stability while allowing motion. These authors have modified some of the original traction splints to create a hand-based version to use for the patients with an intraarticular, proximal interphalangeal joint fracture.

Treatment of complex proximal interphalangeal joint fractures using a new dynamic external fixator: 15 cases

The management of proximal interphalangeal joint fractures of the fingers is difficult. Dynamic traction splinting systems are cumbersome and the Suzuki fixator does not prevent secondary fracture displacement. Fifteen cases were treated with a new dynamic external fixator with distraction, the Ligamentotaxor. In two cases, additional fixation was required with a screw. After 10 months, grip strength scored 85.7% compared with the contralateral hand, flexion achieved 76.3 degrees and the extension deficit was 19.6 degrees . The visual analogical scale pain level (VAS) was 1.9 and the Quick DASH score totalled 16.9. Revision treatment was needed for sepsis for one patient. A case of secondary fracture displacement was corrected in the outpatient clinic. Consolidation was achieved in all cases. In conclusion, despite imperfect outcomes for these complex fractures, we believe that the Ligamentotaxor technique is useful.

Treatment of proximal interphalangeal dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries with dynamic external fixation: a pins and rubber band system

PURPOSE

Unstable, dorsal, intra-articular, fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint can be difficult to treat and often lead to long-term pain, stiffness, and functional deficit. We present the outcomes of patients sustaining such injuries that were treated by a novel dynamic external fixator. This fixator uses a system of K-wires and rubber bands that maintains a concentrically reduced PIP joint while allowing for early motion.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with unstable, dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries of the PIP joint were treated between September 2001 and January 2006. Eight were available for follow-up evaluation at an average of 26 months. We measured PIP range of motion and grip strength, and assessed pain on a visual analog scale. Demographic information about the original injury was recorded. New radiographs were obtained to assess joint congruency and the presence of arthritis or articular step-off deformity.

RESULTS

In the 8 patients available for follow-up evaluation, the average motion of the affected PIP joint was from 1 degrees (range 0 degrees to 5 degrees) to 89 degrees (range 75 degrees to 110 degrees). Grip strength was 92% (range 71% to 110%) of the unaffected hand. The average score on the visual analog pain scale was 0.6 (range 0-1.5). There were few complications. Radiographs at follow-up evaluation showed a concentric reduction in all joints, but with evidence of a small step-off deformity or arthritis in 5 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic external fixator studied is an effective method of treating unstable, dorsal fracture-dislocation injuries. Outcomes compared favorably with those of other similar devices studied in the literature.

Avoiding Pitfalls of the Pins and Rubbers Traction Technique for Fractures of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

Treatment of comminuted intra-articular fractures of the digits with the Pins and Rubbers Traction System (PRTS) has been reported in many small series to give good results. Our experience in more than 40 cases with this technique, however, has not always been favorable. We analyzed outcomes and complications of PRTS treatment in 25 patients with proximal interphalangeal joint fractures reviewed at a mean 13 months (range, 6-52 months) after surgery. Mean arc of motion at this joint was 67.2 degrees (range, 35-110 degrees ) and at the distal interphalangeal joint 40.7 degrees (range, 0-90 degrees ). The latter was immobile in 3 (12%) and 7 patients (28%) had superficial pin track infections. Loss of extension at both joints was a major factor in poor outcomes. Based on this experience, we suggest ways of avoiding common pitfalls of PRTS treatment. Concurrent internal fixation impacts significantly on interphalangeal joint stiffness.

Mini-screw fixation for the treatment of proximal interphalangeal joint dorsal fracture-dislocations

PURPOSE

Surgical intervention may be necessary to treat unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint of the hand. One method of stabilization is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of ORIF for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint using mini-screws via a volar approach.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review with clinical follow-up evaluation was performed on 9 patients who had ORIF for unstable dorsal fracture-dislocations of the PIP joint. The fracture fragment(s) from the middle phalangeal base were reduced and secured using mini-screws.

RESULTS

A clinical evaluation was performed at an average of 42 months after surgery. The average arc of motion for the involved PIP joint was 70 degrees (range, 55 degrees -90 degrees ). The average PIP joint motion in the 2 patients with 1 fracture fragment was 85 degrees , and the average PIP joint motion for the remaining 7 patients was 65 degrees . One joint was subluxated with an intra-articular screw. Nine patients had an average flexion contracture of 14 degrees . Seven patients had no pain, and 2 had pain only with heavy activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Open reduction and internal fixation of unstable dorsal PIP joint fracture-dislocations using mini-screws can be considered if the fracture fragment(s) can accommodate the screws. The procedure attempts to restore the concave contour of the middle phalangeal base and permits early protected range of motion. The procedure should be approached cautiously, especially in the presence of comminution. Proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion is usually compromised; 8 of our 9 joints had a residual flexion contracture.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

A convenient dynamic wire traction-fixation method for hand and forearm fractures

We report on a convenient intraoperative distraction technique, called the modified Dynamic Wire-framed Traction (mDWT) method, that assists in fracture reduction and/or is used as an external fixator in patients with unstable distal radius fractures and in other hand and forearm fractures. The mDWT device is easily assembled with wires at the time of surgery, and its configuration produces sufficient longitudinal distraction force that makes reduction easier and facilitates additional fixation procedures. Furthermore, the device can be converted into a simple unilateral external fixator that can be retained postoperatively. Our experience with 13 patients shows that the mDWT method is easy to apply and is a cost-effective technique when used as an intraoperative distraction device or as an external fixator.

A technique for the repair of chronic volar plate avulsion of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a review of 54 cases

BACKGROUND

The authors delineate a subgroup of proximal interphalangeal joint injuries with chronic pain and limitation of movement, despite a stable joint, and describe and evaluate a surgical procedure.

METHODS

Through a volar approach, the volar plate is freed from scar but remains connected on either the ulnar or radial border. A new connection to the middle phalanx is established by creating a bony groove, and the volar plate is loosely attached distally. Fifty-four joints with chronic volar plate avulsion injuries of the proximal interphalangeal joint were evaluated. All patients had chronic pain and limitation of motion and function in a stable and congruent joint. Patients were examined at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. Range of motion, grip strength, and pain were evaluated. The average time to surgery was 10.5 +/- 11.8 months (range, 2 to 65.4 months). The mean postoperative follow-up period was 10.0 +/- 12.8 months (range, 3 to 73.5 months).

RESULTS

All patients had an improved range of motion following surgery. The difference from the preoperative range of motion was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). None of the patients reported pain on rest after surgery, and five patients reported activity pain. The mean grip strength was 32.4 +/- 13.4 kg for hand that had been operated on and 41.0 +/- 14 kg for the hand that had not been operated on.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique for repair of chronic volar plate avulsion injuries allows early motion and results in significant improvement in range of motion, pain, and overall function in this subgroup of patients.

Fractures récentes des articulations IPP

Recent PIP fractures are challenging trauma in terms of diagnosis as well as treatment. It must be remembered that the final outcome will have a considerable impact on the global finger and hand function. Immediate mobilization and rehabilitation are mandatory, and may justify a surgical approach and fixation in selected cases. A good understanding of the fracture type is essential and relies in good part on precise, focused and standardized radiographs. Non-displaced fractures are generally treated conservatively. In the proximal phalanx, the orientation of the fracture line dictates the stability of the fracture. Thus non-displaced fractures can occasionally be preventively stabilized, in order to allow early mobilization. Displaced fractures should always be anatomically reduced and surgically fixed. A temporary joint stabilization is optional. In the middle phalanx, one must consider palmar and dorsal fractures differently. Palmar fractures include a distal palmar plate avulsion. The degree of impaction will dictate the stability of the joint towards dorsal subluxation. Dorsal fractures include central slip avulsion of the extensor tendon. An antomical reduction and surgical fixation is mandatory to avoid a progressive boutonniere deformity. Prognosis of all the middle fractures is closely dependent on the degree of impaction. When direct osteosynthesis is not possible, distraction devices, bone graft or palmar plate reconstruction may be useful alternatives. In complex fractures, bone fixation and joint stabilization must be combined in order to prevent secondary displacement and joint instability.

Treatment Outcomes of Unstable Proximal Phalangeal Head Fractures of the Finger in Children

The authors reviewed 37 children presenting with closed, unstable fractures of the proximal phalangeal head. Fractures were classified as intra-articular (n = 15), including 14 unicondylar and 1 bicondylar, or extra-articular (n = 22), including 20 subcondylar and 2 comminuted subcondylar. Eighteen patients underwent closed reduction with K-wire fixation (n = 11) or dynamic skeletal traction (n = 7). Nineteen patients underwent open reduction with K-wire fixation (n = 14) or miniscrews (n = 5). Results were considered excellent when the active range of motion (ROM) of the proximal interphalangeal joint was > or = 90 degrees (n = 26); fair, active ROM, 70 to 89 degrees (n = 6); and poor, active ROM < 70 degrees (n = 5). The intra-articular fractures were rated 9 excellent, 5 fair, and 1 poor. The extra-articular fractures were rated 17 excellent, 1 fair, and 4 poor. The 18 closed reductions, K-wire fixation (n = 11) and traction (n = 7), were rated 16 excellent and 2 fair. The 19 open reductions, K-wire fixation (n = 14) and miniscrew fixation (n = 5), were rated 10 excellent, 4 fair, and 5 poor. Closed reduction showed better results than open reduction. Dynamic skeletal traction proved to be simple and effective in treating these injuries.

Dynamic intradigital external fixation for proximal interphalangeal joint fracture dislocations

PURPOSE

Many skeletal traction devices have been described to treat fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. Most of these techniques are technically challenging or involve cumbersome frames. We present a design modification that enhances the stability of a simple dynamic fixation system described previously and report our results with this technique.

METHODS

A previously described simple dynamic fixator with no rubber bands was applied to 6 patients who sustained fracture dislocations of the PIP joint. The middle finger was involved in 3 patients, the ring finger in 1 patient, and the small finger in 2 patients. The average age of the patients was 27 years (range, 21-42 y). The average involvement of the base of the middle phalanx was 48% (range, 35% to 60%). The average time from the injury to the surgery was 6 days (range, 1-14 d). The average follow-up period was 24 months (range, 7-43 mo). Immediate active flexion extension was allowed and the fixator was removed after 3 to 4 weeks.

RESULTS

The average range of motion of the PIP joint at the final follow-up evaluation was 5 degrees to 89 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 100 degrees ). Two patients developed pin track infection that resolved with oral antibiotics. Only one patient complained of mild pain with extreme flexion. Proper reduction and congruency of the joint was noted on final anteroposterior and lateral radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple dynamic fixator for the treatment of unstable PIP joint fracture dislocations was used successfully in 6 digits to maintain reduction and restore digital range of motion. The addition of modifications to the original technique not only improves the solidity of the construct but also provides satisfactory functional results. Based on our experience we recommend this easy technique to treat fracture dislocations of the PIP joint.

Management of intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint by internal fixation and bone grafting

INTRODUCTION

Intra-articular fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint are usually treated by one of many methods of external fixation, but this does not restore the articular surface. We describe a procedure where bone grafting and internal fixation are used to restore the articular surface.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in which three patients underwent surgical treatment for this fracture. We describe a surgical procedure where bone graft harvested from the distal radius is packed through a diaphyseal window to restore the articular surface. This is followed by internal fixation with mini-screws.

RESULTS

The average follow-up was 61 months. At last follow-up the average arc of movement of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 100 deg and the average Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score was 2. Postoperative radiographs showed restoration of the articular contour in all three patients.

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique described addresses the issues of restoration of the articular surface and permits early mobilisation. The results for our group are excellent and compare favourably with those achieved using external fixators described in the literature.

Dynamic traction and minimal internal fixation for thumb and digital pilon fractures

PURPOSE

This study evaluates the use of limited internal fixation and dynamic traction for the treatment of severely displaced digital and thumb pilon fractures.

METHODS

Six patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically at an average of 29 months after surgery (range, 18-36 months) for pain, range of motion, and radiographic signs of joint space narrowing and congruence. Surgery involved the placement of a pin for dynamic traction and an assessment of the adequacy of the articular alignment. A limited incision and supplemental K-wires were often used to improve the position of severely displaced fragments or for the repair of the central tendon.

RESULTS

Three patients were pain free, 2 patients experienced pain with prolonged activity, and 1 patient had pain associated with activities of daily living. Average digital arc of motion of the proximal interphalangeal joint was 94 degrees (range, 90 degrees-100 degrees) and thumb interphalangeal motion was 62.5 degrees (range, 60 degrees-65 degrees). The average duration of digital traction was 3.5 weeks. Four patients had greater than 1 mm incongruity of the articular surface immediately after surgery. At final evaluation, all patients had good joint congruency and 2 patients had joint space narrowing but were asymptomatic. There was 1 minor pin tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic traction combined with limited internal fixation can be an effective treatment for displaced intra-articular pilon fractures. This technique may allow for earlier removal of traction and simultaneous repair of soft tissue injuries.

Treatment of unstable dorsal proximal interphalangeal fracture/dislocations using a hemi-hamate autograft

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic results of a hemi-hamate autograft for the treatment of comminuted dorsal proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint fracture/dislocations.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive patients underwent hemi-hamate autograft for the treatment of an unstable dorsal PIP fracture dislocation. The fractured middle phalangeal base was debrided and the defect was replaced using a size-matched portion of the dorsal/distal hamate osteoarticular surface and was secured with miniscrews. The average middle phalangeal volar lip involvement on initial radiographs was 60% (range, 40% to 80%). The average time to surgery was 45 days (range, 2-175 d). Range of motion, stability, and grip strength were measured at a mean follow-up evaluation of 16 months. Radiographs were evaluated for union, graft incorporation, and/or collapse. Subjective data, satisfaction, and return to work were obtained on 12 of the 13 patients at a mean follow-up evaluation of 17 months.

RESULTS

The average arc of motion at the PIP joint was 85 degrees (range, 65 degrees to 100 degrees ). The distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint average arc of motion was 60 degrees (range, 35 degrees to 80 degrees ). Average grip strength was 80% of the uninjured side. Bony union was achieved in all patients. One graft showed ulnar collapse but graft resorption was not noted. Except for 2 patients with recurrent dorsal subluxation there were no complications. The average pain level was 1.3 (as rated on a visual analog scale of 0-10). Eleven of 12 patients were very satisfied with their function and one was somewhat satisfied; one patient was lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

When greater than 50% of the volar base of the middle phalanx is fractured in a PIP fracture/dislocation or the joint remains unstable despite a lesser degree of involvement, a hemi-hamate autograft should be considered. This procedure reconstructs the cup-shaped contour of the middle phalangeal articular surface and facilitates a stable, functional arc of motion at the PIP joint. Additionally, in our experience the procedure renders minimal disability and has a low complication rate.