Sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay for motexafin gadolinium and motexafin lutetium in human plasma

Simple separation and characterization of lanthanide–polyaminocarboxylic acid complexes by HILIC ESI-MS

Lanthanide complexes with EDTA and DTPA ligands were separated and characterized by HILIC ESI-MS for the first time.

Noninvasive and nondestructive optical spectroscopic measurement of motexafin gadolinium in mouse tissues: comparison to high-performance liquid chromatography

Efficient design of anti-cancer treatments involving radiation- and photo-sensitizing therapeutics requires knowledge of tissue-specific drug concentrations. This study investigates the use of the optical pharmacokinetic system (OPS) to measure concentrations of the anti-cancer agent motexafin gadolinium (MGd) in mouse tissues noninvasively and nondestructively using elastic-scattering spectroscopy. The magnitude of MGd absorbance was quantitated by integration of the MGd peak absorbance area, and MGd concentrations were estimated by comparison with standard curves that were validated by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). In tissue-simulating phantoms in vitro, MGd peak absorbance area correlated with MGd concentration. Female C.B-17 SCID mice, bearing subcutaneous MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer xenografts, were dosed with 23 mg/kg MGd i.v. At specific times between 5 min and 24h after dosing, noninvasive OPS measurements were made on skin overlaying the subcutaneous tumor and skin on the opposite flank in vivo, and following exsanguination, nondestructive measurements were made on tumor, skin, and internal tissues in situ. OPS measurements on tissues in vivo detected MGd present in both tissue and blood perfusing the tissue. Both the OPS and the HPLC detected selective localization of MGd in malignant tissues compared with surrounding non-malignant tissues, and neither technique detected MGd in brain tissue. Comparison of MGd concentrations measured by HPLC and OPS is complicated by mismatch between measured tissue volumes, heterogeneous spatial distribution of MGd in tissues, and blood-localized MGd at early time points. Tumor-specific MGd concentrations measured by HPLC correlated with those measured by OPS in vivo and in situ. Best fit lines to the concentration estimates (forced through zero) had slopes of 0.900 and 1.185, respectively; however, the variability was significant (r(2)=0.477 and 0.269). The clinical utility of the OPS to quantitate MGd concentrations remains to be validated.

Validation and use of three complementary analytical methods (LC–FLS, LC–MS/MS and ICP–MS) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and stability of motexafin gadolinium in plasma and tissues

Liquid chromatography-fluorescence (LC-FLS), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin gadolinium (MGd, Xcytrin) pharmacokinetics and biodistribution in plasma and tissues. The LC-FLS method exhibited the greatest sensitivity (0.0057 microg mL(-1)), and was used for pharmacokinetic, biodistribution, and protein binding studies with small sample sizes or low MGd concentrations. The LC-MS/MS method, which exhibited a short run time and excellent selectivity, was used for routine clinical plasma sample analysis. The ICP-MS method, which measured total Gd, was used in conjunction with LC methods to assess MGd stability in plasma. All three methods were validated using human plasma. The LC-FLS method was also validated using plasma, liver and kidneys from mice and rats. All three methods were shown to be accurate, precise and robust for each matrix validated. For three mice, the mean (standard deviation) concentration of MGd in plasma/tissues taken 5 hr after dosing with 23 mg kg(-1) MGd was determined by LC-FLS as follows: plasma (0.025+/-0.002 microg mL(-1)), liver (2.89+/-0.45 microg g(-1)), and kidney (6.09+/-1.05 microg g(-1)). Plasma samples from a subset of patients with brain metastases from extracranial tumors were analyzed using both LC-MS/MS and ICP-MS methods. For a representative patient, > or = 90% of the total Gd in plasma was accounted for as MGd over the first hour post dosing. By 24 hr post dosing, 63% of total Gd was accounted for as MGd, indicating some metabolism of MGd.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of the novel redox-active agent, motexafin gadolinium, with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary cancers

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the novel anticancer agent, motexafin gadolinium (MGd), administered concurrently with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic or biliary tumors. The pharmacokinetics of MGd were also evaluated.

METHODS

Cohorts of three to six patients were treated with escalating doses of MGd, administered three times per week for a total of 16 doses concurrent with RT. The dose of RT was fixed at 5,040 cGy, and given in 28 fractions, from Monday to Friday of every week. Plasma MGd concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Eight patients were treated at dose level 1 (2.9 mg/kg), with one DLT (grade 3 fever). Three patients were treated at dose level 2 (3.6 mg/kg), and two DLTs were noted. One DLT was grade 3 nausea and vomiting (N/V), and the other was grade 3 skin toxicity. The most common toxicity was N/V. There were no objective responses. The median survival was 6 months. The MGd plasma concentration versus time profile in each patient was best fit by a two-compartment, open, linear model. There was minimal accumulation of MGd in plasma with the three-times/week dosing schedule. Simulation of the time course of MGd in the peripheral compartment indicated that maximal MGd concentrations of 1-2 micromol/kg occurred between 4 and 6 h after MGd infusion.

CONCLUSION

Dose level 1 (2.9 mg/kg of MGd) is the recommended dose for combination with (RT) in phase II studies for locally advanced pancreatic and biliary cancers. Patient tolerance might be improved by modification of the RT schedule and antiemetic prophylaxis.

Behavior of new complexes of tetrakis(4-methoxylphenyl)porphyrin with heavy rare earth elements in reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography

An HPLC method has been developed for the separation of new complexes of tetrakis(4-methoxylphenyl)porphyrin (TMOPP) with four heavy rare earth elements (RE = Y, Er, Tm, and Yb). The function of amine and acid in the mobile phase has been investigated and a reasonable explanation is presented. Successful separation of the RE-TMOPP-Cl complexes is accomplished in 10 min with a mobile phase consisting of methanol-water-acetic acid-triethanolamine. The detection limits (S/N= 3) for the four complexes are 0.01 microg/mL. This method is rapid, sensitive, and simple.

Facile preparation and photophysics of near-infrared luminescent lanthanide(III) monoporphyrinate complexes

The synthesis, characterization, and single crystal X-ray diffraction structures of a series of monoporphyrinate, trivalent lanthanide complexes with the monoanionic ligands hydridotris(1-pyrazolyl)borate (Tp) and (cyclopentadienyl)tris(diethylphosphinito)cobaltate (L(OEt)) having the general formulas M(TPP)(L) (M = Yb, Tm, Er, Ho, Nd, Pr; TPP = 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrinate; L = Tp, L(OEt)) are described. The photophysical properties of these complexes are also presented including their absorption, emission, and transient absorption properties.

Quantitation of motexafin lutetium in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) methods were developed and validated for the evaluation of motexafin lutetium (MLu, lutetium texaphyrin, PCI-0123) pharmacokinetics in human plasma. The LC-MS/MS method was specific for MLu, whereas the ICP-AES method measured total elemental lutetium. Both methods were fast, simple, precise, and accurate. For the LC-MS/MS method, a closely related analogue (PCI-0353) was used as the internal standard (IS). MLu and the IS were extracted from plasma by protein precipitation and injected into an LC-MS/MS system configured with a C18 column and an electrospray interface. The lower limit of quantitation was 0.05 microg MLu mL(-1), with a signal-to-noise ratio of 15:1. The response was linear from 0.05 to 5.0 microg MLu mL(-1). For the ICP-AES method, indium was used as the IS. The sample was digested with nitric acid, diluted, filtered, and then injected into the ICP-AES system. Two standard curve ranges were validated to meet the expected range of sample concentrations: 0.5 to 50, and 0.1 to 10 microg Lu mL(-1). The LC-MS/MS and ICP-AES methods were validated to establish accuracy, precision, analyte stability, and assay robustness. Interday precision and accuracy of quality control samples were < or =6.3% coefficient of variation (CV) and within 2.2% relative error (RE) for the LC-MS/MS method, and < or =8.7% CV and within 4.9% RE for the ICP-AES method. Plasma samples from a subset of patients in a clinical study were analyzed using both methods. For a representative patient, over 90% of the elemental lutetium in plasma could be ascribed to intact MLu at early time points. This percentage decreased to 59% at 48 hours after dosing, suggesting that some degradation and/or metabolism of the drug may have occurred.