1
|
Holder JT, Henry MR, MacDonald AE, Gifford RH. Cochlear Implant Upper Stimulation Levels: eSRT vs. Loudness Scaling. Otol Neurotol 2023; 44:e667-e672. [PMID: 37621113 PMCID: PMC10637929 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the difference in speech recognition and sound quality between programming upper stimulation levels using behavioral measures (loudness scaling) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (eSRTs). STUDY DESIGN Double-blinded acute comparison study. SETTING Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS Eighteen adult (mean age = 60 years) CI users and 20 ears. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Speech recognition scores and sound quality ratings. RESULTS Mean word and sentence in noise recognition scores were 8 and 9 percentage points higher, respectively, for the eSRT-based map. The sound quality rating was 1.4 points higher for the eSRT-based map. Sixteen out of 20 participants preferred the eSRT-based map. CONCLUSIONS Study results show significantly higher speech recognition and more favorable sound quality using an eSRT-based map compared with a loudness-scaling map using a double-blinded testing approach. Additionally, results may be understated as 18 of 20 ears had eSRTs measured before study enrollment. Results underscore the importance of incorporating eSRTs into standard clinical practice to promote best outcomes for CI recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jourdan T Holder
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramos-de-Miguel A, Falcón-González JC, Ramos-Macias A. Analysis of Neural Interface When Using Modiolar Electrode Stimulation. Radiological Evaluation, Trans-Impedance Matrix Analysis and Effect on Listening Effort in Cochlear Implantation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10173962. [PMID: 34501410 PMCID: PMC8432261 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10173962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The proximity of the electrode to the modiolar wall may be of interest to investigate the effect of pitch discrimination. This research establishes the relation between these factors and whether perimodiolar positions may provide benefits regarding improved electrode discrimination. Methods: A prospective randomized study including 24 post-lingual deaf adults was performed. A psychoacoustic study was done by using a psychoacoustic research platform. Radiological study, and a cone-beam computed tomography was used to assess post cochlear implantation electrodes’ position. Trans-impedance matrix (TIM) analysis was performed after cochlear implant insertion in all cases, and pupillometry test was also performed. Results: 12 patients received a slim perimodiolar electrode array, and 12 patients received a straight electrode array. Although all the patients showed similar speech test results after 12 months follow-up, those implanted with a perimodiolar electrode obtained better scores in electrode discrimination test and pupillometry test, and showed more homogenous TIM patterns. Conclusions: The better positioning of the electrode array seams to provide a better hearing resolution and less listening effort trans-impedance matrix seems to be a useful tool to analyze positioning of the perimodiolar array.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Ramos-de-Miguel
- Hearing and Balance Laboratory, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (SIANI), 35001 Las Palmas, Spain;
- Correspondence:
| | - Juan Carlos Falcón-González
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, 35016 Las Palmas, Spain;
| | - Angel Ramos-Macias
- Hearing and Balance Laboratory, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria University (SIANI), 35001 Las Palmas, Spain;
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil de Gran Canaria, 35016 Las Palmas, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Quass GL, Baumhoff P, Gnansia D, Stahl P, Kral A. Level coding by phase duration and asymmetric pulse shape reduce channel interactions in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2020; 396:108070. [PMID: 32950954 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2020] [Revised: 08/21/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Conventional loudness coding with CIs by pulse current amplitude has a disadvantage: Increasing the stimulation current increases the spread of excitation in the auditory nerve, resulting in stronger channel interactions at high stimulation levels. These limit the number of effective information channels that a CI user can perceive. Stimulus intensity information (loudness) can alternatively be transmitted via pulse phase duration. We hypothesized that loudness coding by phase duration avoids the increase in the spread of the electric field and thus leads to less channel interactions at high stimulation levels. To avoid polarity effects, we combined this coding with pseudomonophasic stimuli. To test whether this affects the spread of excitation, 16 acutely deafened guinea pigs were implanted with CIs and neural activity from the inferior colliculus was recorded while stimulating with either biphasic, amplitude-coded pulses, or pseudomonophasic, duration- or amplitude-coded pulses. Pseudomonophasic stimuli combined with phase duration loudness coding reduced the lowest response thresholds and the spread of excitation. We investigated the channel interactions at suprathreshold levels by computing the phase-locking to a pulse train in the presence of an interacting pulse train on a different electrode on the CI. Pseudomonophasic pulses coupled with phase duration loudness coding reduced the interference by 4-5% compared to biphasic pulses, depending on the place of stimulation. This effect of pseudomonophasic stimuli was achieved with amplitude coding only in the basal cochlea, indicating a distance- or volume dependent effect. Our results show that pseudomonophasic, phase-duration-coded stimuli slightly reduce channel interactions, suggesting a potential benefit for speech understanding in humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunnar Lennart Quass
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177).
| | - Peter Baumhoff
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | | | | | - Andrej Kral
- Institute for AudioNeuroTechnology (VIANNA), ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4All" (EXC 2177)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mathew R, Vickers D, Boyle P, Shaida A, Selvadurai D, Jiang D, Undurraga J. Development of electrophysiological and behavioural measures of electrode discrimination in adult cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2018; 367:74-87. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Revised: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
5
|
Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 275:1385-1394. [PMID: 29610960 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-4943-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of electrode discrimination based on electrode to modiolus distance in different cochlear implant models, using image information to estimate the outcomes after an implantation on electrode discrimination METHODS: A descriptive prospective randomized study performed during 16 months. A psychoacoustic platform was used to evaluate patients' electrode discrimination capabilities of patients. For the acquisition of the images, a cone beam computed tomography was used to assess postcochlear implantation of electrodes' position. We considered two other new measurements: the intracochlear position index, which indicates how far is the electrode from the modiolar wall, and the homogeneity factor (HF), which provides us with information about the distance between the electrodes and the modiolus RESULTS: 21 postlingually deaf adults showing different CI models [CI522 (n = 7), CI512 (n = 7), and CI532 (n = 7)] that corresponded to the lateral and perimodiolar array electrodes. The average success rate of the CI522 group was 47%, of the CI512 group was 48%, and of the CI532 group was 77%. There is statistically significant difference between groups CI532-CI522 (p = 0.0033) and CI532-CI512 (p = 0.0027) CONCLUSION: The Nucleus CI532 offers a better perimodiolar placement. HF and IPI measurements provide information about the electrodes location inside the cochlea, being related to electrode discrimination.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mathew R, Undurraga J, Li G, Meerton L, Boyle P, Shaida A, Selvadurai D, Jiang D, Vickers D. Objective assessment of electrode discrimination with the auditory change complex in adult cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2017; 354:86-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 05/16/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
7
|
Hughes ML, Goehring JL, Baudhuin JL, Schmid KK. Effects of stimulus level and rate on psychophysical thresholds for interleaved pulse trains in cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2016; 140:2297. [PMID: 27794318 PMCID: PMC6910005 DOI: 10.1121/1.4963903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2016] [Revised: 09/09/2016] [Accepted: 09/14/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
This study examined channel interactions using interleaved pulse trains to assess masking and potential facilitative effects in cochlear-implant recipients using clinically relevant stimuli. Psychophysical thresholds were measured for two adjacent mid-array electrodes; one served as the masker and the other as the probe. Two rates representative of those found in present-day strategies were tested: 1700 and 3400 pulses per second per channel. Four masker levels ranging from sub-threshold to loud-but-comfortable were tested. It was hypothesized that low-level maskers would produce facilitative effects, shifting to masking effects at high levels, and that faster rates would yield smaller masking effects due to greater stochastic neural firing patterns. Twenty-nine ears with Cochlear or Advanced Bionics devices were tested. High-level maskers produced more masking than low-level maskers, as expected. Facilitation was not observed for sub-threshold or threshold-level maskers in most cases. High masker levels yielded reduced probe thresholds for two Advanced Bionics subjects. This was partly eliminated with a longer temporal offset between each masker-probe pulse pair, as was used with Cochlear subjects. These findings support the use of temporal gaps between stimulation of subsequent electrodes to reduce channel interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Hughes
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Jenny L Goehring
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Jacquelyn L Baudhuin
- Boys Town National Research Hospital, 555 North 30th Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA
| | - Kendra K Schmid
- Department of Biostatistics, 984375 University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-4375, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Egger K, Majdak P, Laback B. Channel Interaction and Current Level Affect Across-Electrode Integration of Interaural Time Differences in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2015; 17:55-67. [PMID: 26377826 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-015-0542-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2014] [Accepted: 08/30/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) is important for sound localization. Normal-hearing listeners benefit from across-frequency processing, as seen with improved ITD thresholds when consistent ITD cues are presented over a range of frequency channels compared with when ITD information is only presented in a single frequency channel. This study aimed to clarify whether cochlear-implant (CI) listeners can make use of similar processing when being stimulated with multiple interaural electrode pairs transmitting consistent ITD information. ITD thresholds for unmodulated, 100-pulse-per-second pulse trains were measured in seven bilateral CI listeners using research interfaces. Consistent ITDs were presented at either one or two electrode pairs at different current levels, allowing for comparisons at either constant level per component electrode or equal overall loudness. Different tonotopic distances between the pairs were tested in order to clarify the potential influence of channel interaction. Comparison of ITD thresholds between double pairs and the respective single pairs revealed systematic effects of tonotopic separation and current level. At constant levels, performance with double-pair stimulation improved compared with single-pair stimulation but only for large tonotopic separation. Comparisons at equal overall loudness revealed no benefit from presenting ITD information at two electrode pairs for any tonotopic spacing. Irrespective of electrode-pair configuration, ITD sensitivity improved with increasing current level. Hence, the improved ITD sensitivity for double pairs found for a large tonotopic separation and constant current levels seems to be due to increased loudness. The overall data suggest that CI listeners can benefit from combining consistent ITD information across multiple electrodes, provided sufficient stimulus levels and that stimulating electrode pairs are widely spaced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Egger
- Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Piotr Majdak
- Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Bernhard Laback
- Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wohllebengasse 12-14, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Modulation detection thresholds (MDTs) vary across stimulation sites in a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array in a manner that is subject and ear specific. Previous studies have demonstrated that speech recognition with a CI can be improved by site-selection strategies, where selected stimulation sites with poor modulation sensitivity are removed from a subject's processor MAP. Limitations of site-selection strategies are that they can compromise spectral resolution and distort frequency-place mapping because the frequencies assigned to the removed sites are usually reallocated to other sites, and site bandwidths are broadened. The objective of the present study was to test an alternative approach for rehabilitation that aimed at improving the across-site mean MDTs by adjusting stimulation parameters at the poorly performing sites. On the basis of previous findings that modulation detection contributes to speech recognition and improves significantly with stimulus level, the authors hypothesized that modulation sensitivity at the poor sites could be improved by artificially increasing stimulation levels at those sites in the speech processor, which then would lead to improved speech recognition. DESIGN Nine postlingually deafened ears implanted with Nucleus CIs were evaluated for MDTs, absolute-detection threshold levels (T levels), and the maximum loudness levels (C levels) on each of the available stimulation sites. For each ear, the minimum stimulation level settings in the speech-processor MAP were raised by 5%, and alternatively by 10%, of the dynamic range (DR) from true thresholds on five stimulation sites with the poorest MDTs. For comparison, a 5% level raise was applied globally to all stimulation sites. The C levels were fixed during these level manipulations. MDTs at the five poorest stimulation sites were compared at 20% DR before and after the level adjustments. Speech-reception thresholds (SRTs), that is, signal to noise ratios required for 50% correct speech recognition, were evaluated for these MAPs using CUNY sentences. The site-specific level-adjusted MAPs were compared with the global-level-adjusted MAP and the MAP without level adjustment. The effects on speech recognition of adjusting the minimal stimulation level settings on the five poorest stimulation sites were also compared with effects of removing these sites from the speech-processor MAP. RESULTS The 5% level increase on the five electrodes with the worst MDTs resulted in an improvement in the group mean SRT of 2.36 dB SNR relative to the MAP without level adjustment. The magnitude of level increase that resulted in the greatest SRT improvement for individuals varied across ears. MDTs measured at 20% DR significantly improved on the poor sites after the level adjustment that resulted in the best SRT for that ear was applied. Increasing the minimal stimulation levels on all stimulation sites or removing sites selected for rehabilitation, the parsimonious approaches, did not improve SRTs. CONCLUSIONS The site-specific adjustments of the T level settings improved modulation sensitivity at low levels and significantly improved subjects' SRTs. Thus, this site-rehabilitation strategy was an effective alternative to site-selection strategies for improving speech recognition in CI users.
Collapse
|
10
|
Richter CP, Rajguru S, Bendett M. Infrared neural stimulation in the cochlea. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2013; 8565:85651Y. [PMID: 25075260 DOI: 10.1117/12.2010337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
The application of photonics to manipulate and stimulate neurons and to study neural networks has gained momentum over the last decade. Two general methods have been used: the genetic expression of light or temperature sensitive ion channels in the plasma membrane of neurons (Optogenetics and Thermogenetics) and the direct stimulation of neurons using infrared radiation (Infrared Neural Stimulation, INS). Both approaches have their strengths and challenges, which are well understood with a profound understanding of the light tissue interaction(s). This paper compares the opportunities of the methods for the use in cochlear prostheses. Ample data are already available on the stimulation of the cochlea with INS. The data show that the stimulation is selective, feasible at rates that would be sufficient to encode acoustic information and may be beneficial over conventional pulsed electrical stimulation. A third approach, using lasers in stress confinement to generate pressure waves and to stimulate the functional cochlea mechanically will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus-Peter Richter
- Department of Otolaryngology, Northwestern University, 303 E. Chicago Ave, Searle 12-561, Chicago, IL 60611, USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Tech E310, Evanston, IL 60208, USA ; The Hugh Knowles Center, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA
| | - Suhrud Rajguru
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami FL 33146, USA ; Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami, Miami FL 33136, USA
| | - Mark Bendett
- Lockheed Martin Aculight, 22121 20th Ave SE, Bothell WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review examines evidence for potential benefits of using cochlear implant electrodes that extend into the apical regions of the cochlea. Most cochlear implant systems use electrode arrays that extend 1 to 1.5 turns from the basal cochleostomy, but one manufacturer (MED-EL GmbH) uses an electrode array that is considerably longer. The fundamental rationale for using electrodes extending toward the apex of the cochlea is to provide additional low-pitched auditory percepts and thereby increase the spectral information available to the user. Several experimental long arrays have also been produced by other manufacturers to assess potential benefits of this approach. DESIGN In addition to assessing the effects of deeply inserted electrodes on performance, this review examines several underlying and associated issues, including cochlear anatomy, electrode design, surgical considerations (including insertion trauma), and pitch scaling trials. Where possible, the aim is to draw conclusions regarding the potential from apical electrodes in general, rather than relating to the performance of specific and current devices. RESULTS Imaging studies indicate that currently available electrode arrays rarely extend more than two turns into the cochlea, the mean insertion angle for full insertions of the MED-EL electrodes being about 630°. This is considerably shorter than the total length of the cochlea and more closely approximates the length of the spiral ganglion. Anatomical considerations, and some modelling studies, suggest that fabrication of even longer electrodes is unlikely to provide additional spectral information. The issue of potential benefit from the most apical electrodes, therefore, is whether they are able to selectively stimulate discrete and tonotopically ordered neural populations near the apex of the spiral ganglion, where the ganglion cells are closely grouped. Pitch scaling studies, using the MED-EL and experimental long arrays, suggest that this is achieved in many cases, but that a significant number of individuals show evidence of pitch confusions or reversals among the most apical electrodes, presumably reducing potential performance benefit and presenting challenges for processor programming. CONCLUSIONS Benefits in terms of speech recognition and other performance measures are less clear. Several studies have indicated that deactivation of apical electrodes results in poorer speech recognition performance, but these have been mostly acute studies where the subjects have been accustomed to the full complement of electrodes, thus making interpretation difficult. Some chronic studies have suggested that apical electrodes do provide additional performance benefit, but others have shown performance improvement after deactivating some of the apical electrodes. Whether or not deeply inserted electrodes can offer performance benefits, there is evidence that currently available designs tend to produce more intracochlear trauma than shorter arrays, in terms of loss of residual acoustic hearing and reduction of the neural substrate. This may have important long-term consequences for the user. Furthermore, as it is possible that subjects with better low-frequency residual hearing are more likely to benefit from the inclusion of apical electrodes, there may be a potential clinical dilemma as the same subjects are those most likely to benefit from bimodal electroacoustic stimulation, requiring a relatively shallow insertion.
Collapse
|
12
|
Bierer JA. Probing the electrode-neuron interface with focused cochlear implant stimulation. Trends Amplif 2010; 14:84-95. [PMID: 20724356 DOI: 10.1177/1084713810375249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cochlear implants are highly successful neural prostheses for persons with severe or profound hearing loss who gain little benefit from hearing aid amplification. Although implants are capable of providing important spectral and temporal cues for speech perception, performance on speech tests is variable across listeners. Psychophysical measures obtained from individual implant subjects can also be highly variable across implant channels. This review discusses evidence that such variability reflects deviations in the electrode-neuron interface, which refers to an implant channel's ability to effectively stimulate the auditory nerve. It is proposed that focused electrical stimulation is ideally suited to assess channel-to-channel irregularities in the electrode-neuron interface. In implant listeners, it is demonstrated that channels with relatively high thresholds, as measured with the tripolar configuration, exhibit broader psychophysical tuning curves and smaller dynamic ranges than channels with relatively low thresholds. Broader tuning implies that frequency-specific information intended for one population of neurons in the cochlea may activate more distant neurons, and a compressed dynamic range could make it more difficult to resolve intensity-based information, particularly in the presence of competing noise. Degradation of both types of cues would negatively affect speech perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Arenberg Bierer
- Department of Speech & Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, 1417 NE 42nd Street, Seattle,WA 98105-6246, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kopelovich JC, Eisen MD, Franck KH. Frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants. Hear Res 2010; 268:105-13. [PMID: 20553829 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2010.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2009] [Revised: 04/29/2010] [Accepted: 05/14/2010] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to develop reliable pediatric psychophysical methodologies in order to address the limits of frequency and electrode discrimination in children with cochlear implants. Discrimination was measured with a two-alternative, adaptive, forced choice design using a video game graphical user interface. Implanted children were compared to normal-hearing children in the same age ranges. Twenty-nine implanted children and 68 children with normal-hearing performed frequency discrimination studies at varying frequencies. Electrode discrimination was assessed in thirty-four implanted children at varying electrode locations and stimulation intensities. Older children had better frequency discrimination than younger children, both for implanted and hearing subjects. Implanted children had worse frequency discrimination overall and exhibited learning effects at older ages than hearing children. Frequency discrimination Weber fractions were smallest in low frequencies. Electrode discrimination improved with stimulus intensity level for older but not younger children at all electrode locations. These results support the premise that developmental changes in signal processing contribute to discrimination of simple acoustic stimuli. For implanted children, auditory discrimination improved at lower frequencies and with electrodes at higher intensity. These findings imply that spatial separation may not be the key determinant in creating discriminable electrical stimuli for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan C Kopelovich
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Packing of the Cochleostomy Site Affects Auditory Nerve Response Thresholds in Precurved Off-Stylet Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:204-9. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181ca8457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
15
|
Chatterjee M, Yu J. A relation between electrode discrimination and amplitude modulation detection by cochlear implant listeners. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2010; 127:415-26. [PMID: 20058987 PMCID: PMC2821169 DOI: 10.1121/1.3257591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2009] [Revised: 10/06/2009] [Accepted: 10/07/2009] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the relation between measures of spectral and temporal resolutions in cochlear implant listeners at a particular electrode location. The hypothesis was that a common underlying factor, such as the health of local groups of neurons, might partially determine patients' sensitivity to both spectral and temporal cues at specific tonotopic locations. Participants were adult cochlear implant listeners. A significant correlation was found between electrode discrimination measured at soft levels (20% and 30% of the dynamic range) and modulation sensitivity at those levels, for stimulation in bipolar mode and a 100 Hz modulation rate. Correlations between the two measures were weaker under monopolar stimulation, or when the modulation rate was 10 Hz. At a higher stimulation level (40% of the dynamic range), no significant correlations between these measures were observed. It is hypothesized that the more restricted excitation pattern at lower levels and/or with a narrower stimulation mode allows the measurement of locally driven sensitivity to spectral and temporal cues, particularly under more challenging listening conditions. Thus, psychophysical measures obtained under conditions that evoke a narrower excitation pattern may serve as a useful indicator of the functional health of local neural populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monita Chatterjee
- Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Cochlear Implants and Psychophysics Laboratory, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Evolution of Cochlear Implant Arrays Result in Changes in Behavioral and Physiological Responses in Children. Otol Neurotol 2009; 30:908-15. [DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e3181b236b0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
17
|
Runge-Samuelson CL. Effects of high-rate pulse trains on electrode discrimination in cochlear implant users. Trends Amplif 2009; 13:76-86. [PMID: 19447763 DOI: 10.1177/1084713809336739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Overcoming issues related to abnormally high neural synchrony in response to electrical stimulation is one aspect in improving hearing with a cochlear implant. Desynchronization of electrical stimuli have shown benefits in neural encoding of electrical signals and improvements in psychophysical tasks. In the present study, 10 participants with either CII or HiRes 90k Advanced Bionics devices were tested for the effects of desynchronizing constant-amplitude high-rate (5,000 Hz) pulse trains on electrode discrimination of sinusoidal stimuli (1,000 Hz). When averaged across the sinusoidal dynamic range, overall improvements in electrode discrimination with high-rate pulses were found for 8 of 10 participants. This effect was significant for the group (p = .003). Nonmonotonic patterns of electrode discrimination as a function of sinusoidal stimulation level were observed. By providing additional spectral channels, it is possible that clinical implementation of constant-amplitude high-rate pulse trains in a signal processing strategy may improve performance with the device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina L Runge-Samuelson
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Goupell MJ, Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD. Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2008; 124:3142-57. [PMID: 19045799 PMCID: PMC3004436 DOI: 10.1121/1.2981638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In experiment 1, six cochlear-implant (CI) listeners discriminated a stimulation pattern eliciting equal loudness for each electrode from a stimulation pattern in which the stimulation at one or more electrodes was increased (peak) or decreased (notch). Three cochlear locations and three bandwidths were tested, without and with level roving. Listeners could always detect peaks but not always notches. Increasing the bandwidth beyond two electrodes produced no improvement in just-noticeable differences (JNDs). JNDs for the basal location were higher than for the apical and middle locations, although listeners had highly individual tendencies. In experiment 2, listeners discriminated changes in the peak heights and notch depths. JNDs for higher peaks were better while JNDs for deeper notches were worse than for experiment 1. In experiment 3, listeners discriminated the electrode position of peaks or notches. JNDs were approximately one electrode. In experiment 4, the first three experiments were repeated with large amounts of level roving. There was no evidence that CI listeners performed an across-channel comparison in these tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Goupell
- Acoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Wohllebengasse 12-14, A-1040 Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pfingst BE, Burkholder-Juhasz RA, Zwolan TA, Xu L. Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays. Hear Res 2008; 242:172-83. [PMID: 18178350 PMCID: PMC2593127 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2007] [Revised: 11/20/2007] [Accepted: 11/20/2007] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Auditory prostheses use implanted electrode arrays that permit stimulation at many sites along the tonotopic axis of auditory neurons. Psychophysical studies demonstrate that measures of implant function, such as detection and discrimination thresholds, vary considerably across these sites, that the across-site patterns of these measures differ across subjects, and that the likely mechanisms underlying this variability differ across measures. Psychophysical and speech recognition studies suggest that not all stimulation sites contribute equally to perception with the prosthesis and that some sites might have negative effects on perception. Studies that reduce the number of active stimulation sites indicate that most cochlear implant users can effectively utilize a maximum of only about seven sites in their processors. These findings support a strategy for improving implant performance by selecting only the best stimulation sites for the processor map. Another approach is to revise stimulation parameters for ineffective sites in an effort to improve acuity at those sites. In this paper, we discuss data supporting these approaches and some potential pitfalls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan E Pfingst
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5506, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Electric charge requirements of pediatric cochlear implant recipients enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation study. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29:143-8. [PMID: 18223443 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0b013e318161aac7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants who are enrolled in the Childhood Development After Cochlear Implantation (CDACI) multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN Longitudinal evaluation during 24 months of speech processor maps of children with cochlear implants prospectively enrolled in the study. SETTING Six tertiary referral centers. SUBJECTS One hundred eighty-eight children enrolled in the CDACI study who were 5 years old or younger at the time of enrollment. Of these children, 184 received unilateral implants, and 4 received simultaneous bilateral implants. INTERVENTION Children attended regular mapping sessions at their implant clinic as part of the study protocol. Maps were examined for each subject at 4 different time intervals: at device activation and 6, 12, and 24 months postactivation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Mean C/M levels (in charge per phase) were compared for 4 different time intervals, for 3 different devices, for 6 different implant centers, and for children with normal and abnormal cochleae. RESULTS All 3 types of implant devices demonstrate significant increases in C/M levels between device activation and the 24-month appointment. Significant differences in mean C/M levels were noted between devices. Children with cochlear anomalies demonstrate significantly greater C/M levels than children with normal cochleae. CONCLUSION The CDACI study has enabled us to evaluate the mapping characteristics of pediatric patients who use 3 different devices and were implanted at a variety of implant centers. Analysis of such data enables us to better understand the mapping characteristics of children with cochlear implants.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity. Hear Res 2007; 235:23-38. [PMID: 18037252 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2007] [Revised: 08/16/2007] [Accepted: 09/14/2007] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
The multichannel design of contemporary cochlear implants (CIs) is predicated on the assumption that each channel activates a relatively restricted and independent sector of the deaf auditory nerve array, just as a sound within a restricted frequency band activates a restricted region of the normal cochlea The independence of CI channels, however, is limited; and the factors that determine their independence, the relative overlap of the activity patterns that they evoke, are poorly understood. In this study, we evaluate the spread of activity evoked by cochlear implant channels by monitoring activity at 16 sites along the tonotopic axis of the guinea pig inferior colliculus (IC). "Spatial tuning curves" (STCs) measured in this way serve as an estimate of activation spread within the cochlea and the ascending auditory pathways. We contrast natural stimulation using acoustic tones with two kinds of electrical stimulation either (1) a loose fitting banded array consisting of a cylindrical silicone elastomer carrier with a linear series of ring contacts; or (2) a space-filling array consisting of a tapered silicone elastomer carrier that is designed to fit snugly into the guinea pig scala tympani with a linear series of ball contacts positioned along it Spatial tuning curves evoked by individual acoustic tones, and by activation of each contact of each array as a monopole, bipole or tripole were recorded. Several channel configurations and a wide range of electrode separations were tested for each array, and their thresholds and selectivity were estimated. The results indicate that the tapered space-filling arrays evoked more restricted activity patterns at lower thresholds than did the banded arrays. Monopolar stimulation (one intracochlear contact activated with an extracochlear return) using either array evoked broad activation patterns that involved the entire recording array at current levels <6dBSL, but at relatively low thresholds. Bi- and tri-polar configurations of both array types evoked more restricted activity patterns, but their thresholds were higher than those of monopolar configurations. Bipolar and tripolar configurations with closely spaced contacts evoked activity patterns that were comparable to those evoked by pure tones. As the spacing of bipolar electrodes was increased (separations >1mm), the activity patterns became broader and evoked patterns with two distinct threshold minima, one associated with each contact.
Collapse
|
22
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS. Effects of carrier pulse rate and stimulation site on modulation detection by subjects with cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2007; 121:2236-46. [PMID: 17471737 PMCID: PMC2562216 DOI: 10.1121/1.2537501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Most modern cochlear-implant speech processors convey speech-envelope information using amplitude-modulated pulse trains. The use of higher-rate carrier pulse trains allows more envelope detail in the signal. However, neural response properties could limit the efficacy of high-rate carriers. This study examined effects of carrier rate and stimulation site, on psychophysical modulation detection thresholds (MDTs). Both of these variables could affect the neural representation of the carrier and thus affect perception of the modulation. Twelve human subjects with cochlear implants were tested. Phase duration of symmetric biphasic pulses was modulated sinusoidally at 40 Hz. MDTs were determined for monopolar stimulation at two carrier rates [250 and 4000 pulses/s (pps)], three stimulation sites (basal, middle, and apical), and five stimulus levels (10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, and 90% of the dynamic range). MDTs were lower for 250 pps carriers than for 4000 pps carriers in 71% of the 180 cases studied. Effects of carrier rate were greatest at the apical stimulation site and effects of stimulation site on MDTs depended on carrier rate. The data suggest a distinct disadvantage to using carrier pulse rates as high as 4000 pps. Stimulation site should be considered in evaluating modulation detection ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan E Pfingst
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0506, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fitzgerald MB, Shapiro WH, McDonald PD, Neuburger HS, Ashburn-Reed S, Immerman S, Jethanamest D, Roland JT, Svirsky MA. The effect of perimodiolar placement on speech perception and frequency discrimination by cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol 2007; 127:378-83. [PMID: 17453457 DOI: 10.1080/00016480701258671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSION Neither speech understanding nor frequency discrimination ability was better in Nucleus Contour users than in Nucleus 24 straight electrode users. Furthermore, perimodiolar electrode placement does not result in better frequency discrimination. OBJECTIVES We addressed three questions related to perimodiolar electrode placement. First, do patients implanted with the Contour electrode understand speech better than with an otherwise identical device that has a straight electrode? Second, do these groups have different frequency discrimination abilities? Third, is the distance of the electrode from the modiolus related to frequency discrimination ability? SUBJECTS AND METHODS Contour and straight electrode users were matched on four important variables. We then tested these listeners on CNC word and HINT sentence identification tasks, and on a formant frequency discrimination task. We also examined X-rays and measured the distance of the electrodes from the modiolus to determine whether there is a relationship between this factor and frequency discrimination ability. RESULTS Both speech understanding and frequency discrimination abilities were similar for listeners implanted with the Contour vs a straight electrode. Furthermore, there was no linear relationship between electrode-modiolus distance and frequency discrimination ability. However, we did note a second-order relationship between these variables, suggesting that frequency discrimination is worse when the electrodes are either too close or too far away from the modiolus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew B Fitzgerald
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Guiraud J, Gallego S, Arnold L, Boyle P, Truy E, Collet L. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear Res 2006; 223:48-60. [PMID: 17157463 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2006] [Revised: 09/22/2006] [Accepted: 09/27/2006] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave IIIe, wave Ve, and interpeak interval IIIe-Ve of electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). EABRs were recorded from all the intra-cochlear electrodes in eight adult HiRes90K((R)) cochlear implant users. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess activity along the auditory pathway. Audiograms before implantation, psychophysics at first fitting and duration of deafness were used to describe the influence of deafness on latencies. A decreasing baso-apical latency gradient was found for waves IIIe and Ve, while the interpeak interval IIIe-Ve remained the same along the electrode array. Electrical stimulation enabling to stimulate various parts of the cochlea at the same time, this could indicate an anatomical way of compensating for the delay the acoustic wave takes to reach the cochlea apex in a non-implanted ear. However, psychophysical levels were also found to increase at the cochlear base showing that the latency gradient could result from an increasing gradient of neural degeneration toward the base. Correlations of EABR latencies with psychophysics, audiometric data and duration of deafness show that factors linked to deafness have indeed an influence on EABR latencies. The possible explanations for the latency shift observed, whether they are anatomical and/or pathological, are exposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne Guiraud
- CNRS UMR 5020, Neurosciences and Sensorial Systems Laboratory, 50 avenue Tony Garnier, 69366 Lyon Cedex, University Lyon 1, Lyon F-69003, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kwon BJ, van den Honert C. Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006; 120:EL1-6. [PMID: 16875252 DOI: 10.1121/1.2208152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Cochlear implant users may perceive intermediate place-pitches between those elicited by the individual electrodes when two electrodes are stimulated simultaneously or sequentially. This study examined pitch discrimination between adjacent electrodes using sequential dual-electrode stimulation in terms of the sensitivity index, d', which was obtained by adding d's from intermediate dual-electrode stimuli. Loudness was balanced for each tested pair and the intensities were roved. Twelve ears with the Nucleus 24 or Freedom implants demonstrated a wide range of d', from 0.7 to 9.6. "Virtual channels" can be implemented through nonsimultaneous stimulation, with comparable pitch discrimination to that observed with simultaneous stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bom Jun Kwon
- Cochlear Americas, 400 Inverness Parkway, Suite 400, Englewood, Colorado 80112, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- Colette M McKay
- School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hughes ML, Abbas PJ. Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006; 119:1538-47. [PMID: 16583899 DOI: 10.1121/1.2164969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
The primary goal of this study was to examine electrophysiologic measures of channel interaction, electrode pitch discrimination ability using a pitch-ranking task, and behavioral threshold levels in individuals implanted with a straight electrode array versus a perimodiolar array. It was hypothesized that perimodiolar arrays should yield lower thresholds, less channel interaction as measured with the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), and better electrode pitch-ranking ability. Results from ten adult Nucleus 24 recipients (N=5 straight array, N=5 perimodiolar Contour array) showed no significant difference in threshold between the two electrode designs; however, there was significantly better electrode pitch-ranking ability and less channel interaction as measured with the ECAP for perimodiolar electrodes. Additionally, there was a significant positive correlation between behavioral threshold and width of the ECAP interaction function for Contour group data. There was no significant correlation between behavioral threshold and electrode pitch-ranking ability. These data suggest that electrode design and/or perimodiolar position may reduce physiologic channel interaction in the cochlea and improve electrode pitch discrimination ability; however, this positive finding did not translate into significantly better speech perception ability for Contour subjects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle L Hughes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pfingst BE, Xu L. Psychophysical metrics and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10:331-41. [PMID: 16103644 PMCID: PMC1472183 DOI: 10.1159/000087350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2004] [Accepted: 04/21/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Intersubject variability in perception is a prominent characteristic of people with cochlear implants. This study characterized intersubject differences using simple metrics based on psychophysical measures: maximum comfortable loudness levels (C levels) and dynamic ranges (DRs). In a group of 17 subjects, we assessed across-site variation (ASV) and across-site mean (ASM) values of C levels and DRs for bipolar (BP) and monopolar (MP) stimulation, and examined the relation of these metrics to speech recognition across subjects. Significant negative correlations with speech recognition were found for ASVs of C levels for BP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high ASVs of BP C levels had poor speech recognition. Positive correlations with speech recognition were found for ASMs of C levels and ASMs of DRs for both BP and MP stimulation; i.e., subjects with high mean C levels and large mean DRs had better speech recognition. Thus, these psychophysical metrics are effective for diagnosis of individual differences in performance of subjects with cochlear implants. Furthermore, they point to some potentially useful treatment procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan E Pfingst
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0506, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Donaldson GS, Kreft HA, Litvak L. Place-pitch discrimination of single- versus dual-electrode stimuli by cochlear implant users (L). THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2005; 118:623-6. [PMID: 16158620 DOI: 10.1121/1.1937362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Simultaneous or near-simultaneous activation of adjacent cochlear implant electrodes can produce pitch percepts intermediate to those produced by each electrode separately, thereby increasing the number of place-pitch steps available to cochlear implant listeners. To estimate how many distinct pitches could be generated with simultaneous dual-electrode stimulation, the present study measured place-pitch discrimination thresholds for single- versus dual-electrode stimuli in users of the Clarion CII device. Discrimination thresholds were expressed as the proportion of current directed to the secondary electrode of the dual-electrode pair. For 16 of 17 electrode pairs tested in six subjects, thresholds ranged from 0.11 to 0.64, suggesting that dual-electrode stimuli can produce 2-9 discriminable pitches between the pitches of single electrodes. Some subjects demonstrated a level effect, with better place-pitch discrimination at higher stimulus levels. Equal loudness was achieved with dual-electrode stimuli at net current levels that were similar to or slightly higher than those for single-electrode stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail S Donaldson
- Clinical Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, MMC 396, Rm 8-323 PWB, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC. Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2004; 5:305-22. [PMID: 15492888 PMCID: PMC2504547 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4026-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2003] [Accepted: 04/05/2004] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The design of contemporary multichannel cochlear implants is predicated on the presumption that they activate multiple independent sectors of the auditory nerve array. The independence of these channels, however, is limited by the spread of activation from each intracochlear electrode across the auditory nerve array. In this study, we evaluated factors that influence intracochlear spread of activation using two types of intracochlear electrodes: (1) a clinical-type device consisting of a linear series of ring contacts positioned along a silicon elastomer carrier, and (2) a pair of visually placed (VP) ball electrodes that could be positioned independently relative to particular intracochlear structures, e.g., the spiral ganglion. Activation spread was estimated by recording multineuronal evoked activity along the cochleotopic axis of the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). This activity was recorded using silicon-based single-shank, 16-site recording probes, which were fixed within the ICC at a depth defined by responses to acoustic tones. After deafening, electric stimuli consisting of single biphasic electric pulses were presented with each electrode type in various stimulation configurations (monopolar, bipolar, tripolar) and/or various electrode orientations (radial, off-radial, longitudinal). The results indicate that monopolar (MP) stimulation with either electrode type produced widepread excitation across the ICC. Bipolar (BP) stimulation with banded pairs of electrodes oriented longitudinally produced activation that was somewhat less broad than MP stimulation, and tripolar (TP) stimulation produced activation that was more restricted than MP or BP stimulation. Bipolar stimulation with radially oriented pairs of VP ball electrodes produced the most restricted activation. The activity patterns evoked by radial VP balls were comparable to those produced by pure tones in normal-hearing animals. Variations in distance between radially oriented VP balls had little effect on activation spread, although increases in interelectrode spacing tended to reduce thresholds. Bipolar stimulation with longitudinally oriented VP electrodes produced broad activation that tended to broaden as the separation between electrodes increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell L Snyder
- Epstein Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0526, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Electrode pitch ranking was assessed as a function of cochlear region, electrode spacing, and stimulation rate in eight subjects implanted with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ implant. The MED-EL COMBI 40+ electrode array allows deep insertion of the electrode up to the apex of the cochlea and provides a wide electrode spacing of 2.4 mm. DESIGN The pitch of a reference electrode was compared with the pitch of two apical and two basal probe electrodes using a two-alternative forced-choice procedure. The reference electrodes were placed in the apical region, in the middle region, and in the basal region of the cochlea. Each condition was tested at pulse rates of 1515 pps, 500 pps, and 250 pps. RESULTS Electrode pitch ranking did not depend on electrode spacing, the position of the reference electrode in the cochlea, or stimulation rate. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate that a spacing of 2.4 mm seems sufficient to allow good electrode pitch ranking performance for the average user and that electrode pitch ranking is similar in the apical, middle, and basal region of the cochlea, irrespective of the stimulation rate. Most importantly, the results of this study indicate that residual neural structures in the apical region of the cochlea are sensitive to pitch changes provided by different places of electrical stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uwe Baumann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Munich, Müchen, Germany. Uwe.Baumannmed.uni-muenchen.de
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Laneau J, Wouters J. Multichannel place pitch sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2004; 5:285-94. [PMID: 15148651 PMCID: PMC2504550 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4049-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2003] [Accepted: 03/26/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implant recipients perceive a rise in pitch when the site of stimulation is moved from the apex toward the base. The place pitch sensitivity is typically measured using the stimulation of single channels. However, all current cochlear implant devices stimulate multiple channels simultaneously or with pulses temporally interleaved. The primary goal of the present study is to test whether the sensitivity of a cochlear implant recipient to changes in perceived pitch associated with changes of place of excitation improves or deteriorates when the number of active channels is increased, compared with stimulation with only one active channel. Place pitch sensitivity was recorded in four Nucleus CI24 subjects as a function of number of active channels (from 1 to 8). Just noticeable differences were estimated from a constant stimuli 2AFC pitch-ranking experiment with roving loudness. Reference and comparison stimuli contained the same number of active channels but were shifted one or two electrodes toward the base or toward the apex. The place pitch sensitivity was measured using monopolar stimulation at two locations along the electrode array. To minimize cues related to loudness, the multichannel stimuli were loudness balanced relative to the single-channel stimuli presented at C-level. The number of active channels did not affect place pitch sensitivity. This is consistent with a model that compares the edges of the excitation pattern irrespective of the overlap between excitation patterns. There was a significant difference in sensitivity to place pitch among subjects. The average just noticeable differences of place pitch, extrapolated from a fitting procedure, for the subjects ranged from 0.25 mm to 0.46 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Laneau
- Laboratory for Experimental ORL, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: coding of stimulus channel and current level. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87:493-507. [PMID: 11784765 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00211.2001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This study quantified the accuracy with which populations of neurons in the auditory cortex can represent aspects of electrical cochlear stimuli presented through a cochlear implant. We tested the accuracy of coding of the place of stimulation (i.e., identification of the active stimulation channel) and of the stimulus current level. Physiological data came from the companion study, which recorded spike activity of neurons simultaneously from 16 sites along the tonotopic axis of the guinea pig's auditory cortex. In that study, cochlear electrical stimuli were presented to acutely deafened animals through a 6-electrode animal version of the 22-electrode Nucleus banded electrode array (Cochlear). Cochlear electrode configurations consisted of monopolar (MP), bipolar (BP + N) with N inactive electrodes between the active and return electrodes (0 < or = N < or = 3), tripolar (TP) with one active electrode and two flanking return electrodes, and common ground (CG) with one active electrode and as many as five return electrodes. In the present analysis, an artificial neural network was trained to recognize spatiotemporal patterns of cortical activity in response to single presentations of particular stimuli and, thereby, to identify those stimuli. The accuracy of pair-wise discrimination of stimulation channels or of current levels was represented by the discrimination index, d', where d' = 1 was taken as threshold. In many cases, the threshold for discrimination of place of cochlear stimulation was < 0.75 mm, and the threshold for discrimination of current levels was < 1 dB. Cochlear electrode configurations varied in the accuracy with which they signaled to the auditory cortex the place of cochlear stimulation. The BP + N and TP configurations provided considerably greater sensitivity to place of stimulation than did the MP configuration. The TP configuration maintained accurate signaling of place of stimulation up to the highest current levels, whereas sensitivity was degraded at high current levels in BP + N configurations. Electrode configurations also varied in the dynamic range over which they signaled stimulus current level. Dynamic ranges were widest for the BP + 0 configuration and narrowest for the TP configuration. That is, the configuration that showed the most accurate signaling of cochlear place of stimulation (TP) showed the most restricted dynamic range for signaling of current level. These results suggest that the choice of the optimal electrode configuration for use by human cochlear-prosthesis users would depend on the particular demands of the speech-processing strategy that is to be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C Middlebrooks
- Kresge Hearing Research Institute (Department of Otorhinolaryngology) and Neuroscience Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0506, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2001; 110:1150-63. [PMID: 11519582 DOI: 10.1121/1.1381538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 721] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Speech recognition was measured as a function of spectral resolution (number of spectral channels) and speech-to-noise ratio in normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear-implant (CI) listeners. Vowel, consonant, word, and sentence recognition were measured in five normal-hearing listeners, ten listeners with the Nucleus-22 cochlear implant, and nine listeners with the Advanced Bionics Clarion cochlear implant. Recognition was measured as a function of the number of spectral channels (noise bands or electrodes) at signal-to-noise ratios of + 15, + 10, +5, 0 dB, and in quiet. Performance with three different speech processing strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and SAS) was similar across all conditions, and improved as the number of electrodes increased (up to seven or eight) for all conditions. For all noise levels, vowel and consonant recognition with the SPEAK speech processor did not improve with more than seven electrodes, while for normal-hearing listeners, performance continued to increase up to at least 20 channels. Speech recognition on more difficult speech materials (word and sentence recognition) showed a marginally significant increase in Nucleus-22 listeners from seven to ten electrodes. The average implant score on all processing strategies was poorer than scores of NH listeners with similar processing. However, the best CI scores were similar to the normal-hearing scores for that condition (up to seven channels). CI listeners with the highest performance level increased in performance as the number of electrodes increased up to seven, while CI listeners with low levels of speech recognition did not increase in performance as the number of electrodes was increased beyond four. These results quantify the effect of number of spectral channels on speech recognition in noise and demonstrate that most CI subjects are not able to fully utilize the spectral information provided by the number of electrodes used in their implant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Friesen
- Department of Auditory Implants and Perception, House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, California 90057, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Henry BA, McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. The relationship between speech perception and electrode discrimination in cochlear implantees. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2000; 108:1269-1280. [PMID: 11008827 DOI: 10.1121/1.1287711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) procedures were used to measure the amount of speech information perceived in five frequency bands (170-570, 570-1170, 1170-1768, 1768-2680, and 2680-5744 Hz) by 15 users of the Cochlear Ltd. CI-22M implant and Spectra-22/SPEAK processor. The speech information perceived was compared to that perceived by normal-hearing listeners. The ability of these subjects to discriminate between stimulation on adjacent electrodes corresponding to each frequency band was also investigated, using a 4IFC procedure with random current level variations of between 0% and 60% of the dynamic range. Relative to normal-hearing listeners, speech information was, on average, significantly more reduced in the four frequency regions between 170 and 2680 Hz than in the region 2680-5744 Hz. There was a significant correlation between electrode discrimination ability (when the random level variation encompassed 20% or more of the dynamic range) and the amount of speech information perceived in the four frequency regions between 170 and 2680 Hz. There was no such correlation in the region 2680-5744 Hz, regardless of the extent of random level variation. These results indicate that speech information in the low to medium frequencies is more difficult for implantees to perceive, that this difficulty is correlated with the difficulty in discriminating electrode place in the presence of random loudness variations, and that fine spectral discrimination may be relatively more important in the vowel-formant regions than in higher frequency regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A Henry
- The University of Melbourne, Department of Otolaryngology, Parkville, Australia.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|