Valproic acid in neonatal status convulsivus

Treating the symptom or treating the disease in neonatal seizures: a systematic review of the literature

Aim

The existing treatment options for neonatal seizures have expanded over the last few decades, but no consensus has been reached regarding the optimal therapeutic protocols. We systematically reviewed the available literature examining neonatal seizure treatments to clarify which drugs are the most effective for the treatment of specific neurologic disorders in newborns.

Method

We reviewed all available, published, literature, identified using PubMed (published between August 1949 and November 2020), that focused on the pharmacological treatment of electroencephalogram (EEG)-confirmed neonatal seizures.

Results

Our search identified 427 articles, of which 67 were included in this review. Current knowledge allowed us to highlight the good clinical and electrographic responses of genetic early-onset epilepsies to sodium channel blockers and the overall good response to levetiracetam, whose administration has also been demonstrated to be safe in both full-term and preterm newborns.

Interpretation

Our work contributes by confirming the limited availability of evidence that can be used to guide the use of anticonvulsants to treat newborns in clinical practice and examining the efficacy and potentially harmful side effects of currently available drugs when used to treat the developing newborn brain; therefore, our work might also serve as a clinical reference for future studies.

Etiology of neonatal seizures and maintenance therapy use: a 10-year retrospective study at Toulouse Children's hospital

BACKGROUND

No guidelines exist concerning the maintenance antiepileptic drug to use after neonatal seizures. Practices vary from one hospital to another. The aim of this study was to investigate etiologies and to report on the use of maintenance antiepileptic therapy in our population of full-term neonates presenting neonatal seizures.

METHODS

From January 2004 to October 2014, we retrospectively collected data from all full-term neonates with neonatal seizures admitted to the Children's Hospital of Toulouse, France.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-three neonates were included (59% males, 48% electroencephalographic confirmation). The frequencies of etiologies of neonatal seizures were: hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (n = 91; 37%), ischemic infarction (n = 36; 15%), intracranial hemorrhage (n = 29; 12%), intracranial infection (n = 19; 8%), metabolic or electrolyte disorders (n = 9; 3%), inborn errors of metabolism (n = 5; 2%), congenital malformations of the central nervous system (n = 11; 5%), epileptic syndromes (n = 27; 12%) and unknown (n = 16; 7%). A maintenance therapy was prescribed in 180 (72%) newborns: valproic acid (n = 123), carbamazepine (n = 28), levetiracetam (n = 17), vigabatrin (n = 2), and phenobarbital (n = 4). In our cohort, the choice of antiepileptic drug depended mainly on etiology. The average duration of treatment was six months.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, valproic acid was the most frequently prescribed maintenance antiepileptic therapy. However, the arrival on the market of new antiepileptic drugs and a better understanding of the physiopathology of genetic encephalopathies is changing our practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. Patient data were reported to the "Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés" under the number 2106953 .

A systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of antiepileptic drugs in neonates with refractory seizures

BACKGROUND

Neonatal seizures are associated with neurological sequelae and an increased risk of epilepsy later in life. Phenobarbital and phenytoin remain the antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) most commonly used to treat neonatal seizures, despite their suboptimal effectiveness and safety. As a result, other AEDs, such as levetiracetam and topiramate, are often used in neonates with refractory seizures, despite limited data and off-label use.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review published pharmacokinetic data for second-line AEDs used in neonates with seizures and to provide dosing recommendations for these agents in the neonatal population.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed (1949-May 2012), Medline (1950-May 2012), and Embase (1980-May 2012). Each study was ranked according to the quality of evidence it provided, based on the classification system developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Information extracted from each study included study design, number of subjects, gestational and postnatal age, AED dosage regimen, pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacokinetic model, AED serum concentrations, and sampling times.

RESULTS

Nineteen relevant pharmacokinetic studies involving a total of 8 different drugs were identified. No prospective, randomized, controlled studies (level I evidence) or nonrandomized controlled studies (level II-I evidence) were identified; 2 studies were prospective, nonrandomized, uncontrolled (cohort) studies (level II-2 evidence), 11 studies obtained evidence from multiple time series (level II-3 evidence), and 6 studies were case reports or descriptive studies (level III evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited pharmacokinetic data for the use of carbamazepine, levetiracetam, lidocaine, paraldehyde, topiramate, valproic acid, and vigabatrin for neonates with seizures refractory to treatment with first-line antiepileptic agents. Further research is needed to elucidate target AED serum concentrations (if any) required to optimize effectiveness and minimize dose-related adverse effects in neonates.

Neonatal seizures: to treat or not to treat?

The immature brain is intrinsically hyperexcitable, a feature that, despite being crucial for learning, synaptogenesis and neuronal plasticity, predisposes the neonate to seizures. Seizures represent the most common neurologic manifestation of impaired brain function in this age group. Importantly, although seizure-induced neuronal injury is minimal in the "healthy" neonatal brain, the "metabolically-compromised" brain appears more vulnerable. Even in the "healthy" brain, however, seizures result in impaired learning, enhanced susceptibility to further seizures, and increased risk of brain injury with seizures later in life, as a result of altered hippocampal circuitry. Given these findings, an aggressive approach to neonatal seizures appears warranted. However, our current conventional therapies (including phenobarbital, phenytoin, and benzodiazepines), even when used in combination, are often ineffective in controlling seizures. Lidocaine may yield better efficacy but requires more study. Recent animal data suggest that alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole proprionic acid (AMPA) antagonists such as topiramate may have a neuroprotective role. However, further work is needed to confirm the safety of excitatory amino acid antagonists in neonates because there remains a prevailing concern that such agents may impair normal neurodevelopmental processes.

Intravenous valproate dosing in neonates

The loading dosage of intravenous valproate required to achieve a desired serum concentration in neonates is not known. Two neonates with seizures received loading doses of intravenous valproate over 30 minutes. Serum valproate concentrations were measured 45 minutes and 3 hours after initiation of the infusion. Both neonates had received phenobarbital and phenytoin before the loading infusions. In the first patient, a loading dose of intravenous valproate of 10 mg/kg increased the 45-minute postinfusion serum valproate concentration to 41 microg/mL with a 3-hour postinfusion serum valproate concentration of 33 microg/mL. In the second patient, a loading dose of 25 mg/kg increased the 45-minute postinfusion serum valproic acid concentration to 100 microg/mL with a 3-hour postinfusion serum valproic acid concentration of 78 microg/mL. We found that each 1 mg/kg of intravenous valproate increased the 45-minute and 3-hour postinfusion serum valproic acid concentrations by approximately 4 microg/mL and 3 microg/mL, respectively. We suggest that these figures be used to calculate the desirable loading dose of intravenous valproate in neonates until larger studies are conducted. The volume of distribution and the serum clearance of valproate were approximately 0.245 L/kg and 25 mL/h/kg, respectively.

The role of intravenous valproic acid in status epilepticus

Valproic acid (VA) has been reported to be effective in status epilepticus (SE) when given rectally. More recently, intravenous (IV) VA has been demonstrated to be effective and safe. Pharmacokinetic studies and initial clinical experience with IV valproic acid suggest that it may have a useful role in the management of refractory status epilepticus, but the magnitude of its utility is not possible to quantify or compare with phenytoin and phenobarbital. In simple SE, IV VA provides less additional benefit, since standard therapy usually works well. IV VA may be useful as a substitute for standard simple SE therapy, but this is difficult to justify unless adverse reactions to standard therapy are anticipated. The published pediatric experience with IV VA for SE is scant.

Use of intravenous valproate in three pediatric patients with nonconvulsive or convulsive status epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To report the pharmacokinetics of intravenous valproate (VPA) in children with generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) or nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). To provide loading and maintenance dosing for patients with hepatic induction secondary to concurrent anticonvulsants.

CASE SUMMARY

Two patients (10 y, 34 mo) with GCSE refractory to benzodiazepines, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and pentobarbital received intravenous VPA. Apparent volume of distribution (Vd) following a 20 mg/kg loading dose was 0.29 L/kg. Maintenance infusions of 4-6 mg/kg/h produced steady-state total concentrations of 66 mg/L and 92.4 mg/L (unbound concentration 44.6 mg/L). Clearance ranged from 63-66 mL/h/kg. An eight-year-old with NCSE received intravenous VPA (13.4 mg/kg load followed by 9 mg/kg every 8 h). Total and unbound steady-state VPA concentrations were 32.9 mg/L and 21.2 mg/L, respectively. Elimination half-life was eight hours.

DISCUSSION

We constructed a pharmacokinetic simulation using VPA parameters from children receiving mono- or polyanticonvulsants. Our Vd and elimination half-life rates were comparable with published pediatric values. Patients on hepatic inducers had clearance rates 2.5 times those of children receiving oral anticonvulsant polytherapy. Unbound fractions (48.3% and 66%) were significantly higher than normal.

CONCLUSIONS

A 20 mg/kg loading dose should produce a concentration after the bolus dose of approximately 75 mg/L. Initial infusion should consider hepatic induction (noninduced = 1 mg/kg/h, polyanticonvulsant therapy = 2 mg/kg/h, and high-dose pentobarbital = 4 mg/kg/h). Adjustments should be based on response and serum concentrations.

Treatment of childhood epilepsy with rectal valproate: case reports and pharmacokinetic study

Two children with status epilepticus were treated successfully by the rectal administration of valproate (VPA), and complete seizure control was obtained in one patient without severe side effects. In addition, there was no essential difference in pharmacokinetics between rectal and oral administration of VPA as determined by computerized simulation of plasma concentration data of VPA after rectal administration in two healthy adults or an epileptic child. Although these findings suggest that the early absorption of VPA within 30 minutes of rectal administration is slightly more rapid than that of oral administration, rectal VPA seems to be unsuitable for the first choice in the treatment of status epilepticus, since it has not so immediate effects as intravenous administration of DZP.