1
|
Arsenault H, Kuffel A, Daeid NN, Gray A. Trace DNA and its persistence on various surfaces: A long term study investigating the influence of surface type and environmental conditions - Part one, metals. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2024; 70:103011. [PMID: 38324952 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
It is imperative for proper evidence triage that forensic biologists understand what kind of results to expect from certain evidence types submitted for DNA analysis. The persistence of trace DNA has been insufficiently investigated and there is little data available pertaining to the persistence of DNA in different environmental conditions and on different materials. The goal of this study is to increase the available data on this topic which would, in turn, help forensic biologists manage expectations when submitting specific evidence types for DNA testing. The work presented herein is a large-scale persistence project aimed to identify trends in the persistence of trace DNA and indicate how different environmental storage conditions and target surface characteristics influence the persistence of cellular and cell free DNA (cfDNA) over time. To eliminate variation within the experiment we used a proxy DNA deposit consisting of a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and/or cfDNA. Samples were collected and analysed from 7 metals over the course of 1 year (27 time points) under 3 different environmental storage conditions. The results of this experiment show that metal type greatly influences DNA persistence. For instance, copper exhibited an expected poor DNA persistence (up to 4 h) which a purification step did not help increase the DNA yield. Alternatively, DNA can persist for up to a year on lead at levels potentially high enough to allow for forensic DNA testing. Additionally, this study showed that the sample storage environment had no impact on DNA persistence in most cases. When considering DNA type, cfDNA was shown to persist for longer than cellular DNA and persistence as a whole appears to be better when DNA is deposited as mixtures over when deposited alone. Unsurprisingly, it can be expected that DNA recovery rates from trace deposits will decrease over time. However, DNA decay is highly dependent on the metal surface and extremely variable at short time points but slightly less variable as time since deposition increases. This data is intended to add to our understanding of DNA persistence and the factors which affect it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Arsenault
- Leverhulme Research Center for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Smalls Wynd, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK.
| | - Agnieszka Kuffel
- Leverhulme Research Center for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Smalls Wynd, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| | - Niamh Nic Daeid
- Leverhulme Research Center for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Smalls Wynd, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| | - Alexander Gray
- Leverhulme Research Center for Forensic Science, University of Dundee, Smalls Wynd, Dundee DD1 4HN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tiedge TM, Nagachar N, Wendt FR, Lakhtakia A, Roy R. High-throughput DNA sequencing of environmentally insulted latent fingerprints after visualization with nanoscale columnar-thin-film technique. Sci Justice 2021; 61:505-515. [PMID: 34482930 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 04/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The goals of this study were to (a) ascertain human identity capabilities of DNA obtained from latent fingerprints that have been first environmentally insulted and then developed by the deposition of a columnar thin film (CTF), and (b) to determine if the CTF process and material are detrimental to single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis. Fingerprints were deposited on five different types of substrates and aged for one day, 7 days or 30 days while being environmentally insulted under one of the four conditions: 16.6 °C and 60% relative humidity (RH) (Condition A), 24.5 °C and 60% RH (Condition B), 35 °C and 67% RH (Condition C) and a cold condition (Condition D). Then CTF technique was then on 59% of these fingerprints. DNA samples from 805 fingerprints were extracted, quantified, subjected to manual library preparation using the Precision ID Identity Panel, and underwent high-throughput sequencing. The Ion S5™ platform was employed to sequence 124 SNP amplicons. SNPs were successfully sequenced from 802/805 samples. Total read depth was consistent across environmental conditions, and majority of samples had 100% profile completeness and 100% concordance. Anecdotally, libraries that were amplified with a higher cycle number had more 'Major Allele Frequency' flags compared to samples amplified with 23 cycle numbers, possibly due to stochastic effects. Neither the substrates nor the CTF process and materials inhibit downstream DNA analysis. DNA of low quality and quantity from the chosen samples can be sequenced using the Precision ID Identity Panel on the Ion S5™ platform which performed well, however, a different approach may be needed if spurious alleles are suspected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa M Tiedge
- Forensic Science Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Nivedita Nagachar
- Forensic Science Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Frank R Wendt
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine & VA CT Healthcare System, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
| | - Akhlesh Lakhtakia
- Materials Research Institute and Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
| | - Reena Roy
- Forensic Science Program and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kallupurackal V, Kummer S, Voegeli P, Kratzer A, Dørum G, Haas C, Hess S. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods. J Forensic Sci 2021; 66:1889-1900. [PMID: 33928655 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Collection of touch DNA from an offender on the victim's skin can provide relevant evidence for investigations of criminal cases. Therefore, the choice of the optimal sample collection method is crucial. In this study, we investigated the recovery of STR profiles from touch DNA on human skin by comparing nine different collection methods: the dry and wet cotton swabs in three different movements, the double-swab (wet-dry) method, the wet and dry Copan FLOQSwabs™, and the Scene Safe FAST™ minitapes. Mock assault scenarios were conducted with a male offender grasping the forearms of a female victim. Samples were collected from the assaulted area of the victim's skin, and the recovery of the offender's STR profile was evaluated. Our results indicate that the different swabs and swabbing techniques did not have a distinct impact on the STR recovery; however, the lowest STR recovery was achieved with Scene Safe FAST™ minitapes. In addition, we compared the double-swab method to the single-swab method by analyzing the DNA quantity of the wet and dry swabs separately. We found on average 13.7% more offender DNA using the double-swab method, but this did not translate into higher STR recovery. Our findings indicate that several methods perform equally well when collecting touch DNA from human skin, although SceneSafe FAST™ minitapes seem to be the least adequate for this purpose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venus Kallupurackal
- Department of Forensic Genetics, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sonja Kummer
- Zurich Forensic Science Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pamela Voegeli
- Department of Forensic Genetics, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Adelgunde Kratzer
- Department of Forensic Genetics, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guro Dørum
- Department of Forensic Genetics, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cordula Haas
- Department of Forensic Genetics, Zurich Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Hess
- Zurich Forensic Science Institute, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ostojic L, O'Connor C, Wurmbach E. Micromanipulation of single cells and fingerprints for forensic identification. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2020; 51:102430. [PMID: 33260060 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Revised: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Crime scene samples often include biological stains, handled items, or worn clothes and may contain cells from various donors. Applying routine sample collection methods by using a portion of a biological stain or swabbing the entire suspected touched area of the evidence followed by DNA extraction often leads to DNA mixtures. Some mixtures can be addressed with sophisticated interpretation protocols and probabilistic genotyping software resulting in DNA profiles of their contributors. However, many samples remain unresolved, providing no investigative information. Samples with many contributors are often the most challenging samples in forensic biology. Examples include gang rape situations or where the perpetrator's DNA is present in traces among the overwhelming amounts of the victim's DNA. If this is the only available evidence in a case, it is of paramount importance to generate usable information. An alternative approach, to address biological mixtures, could be the collection of individual cells directly from the evidence and testing them separately. This method could prevent cells from being inadvertently blended during the extraction process, thus resulting in DNA mixtures. In this study, multiple tools coupled with adhesive microcarriers to collect single cells were evaluated. These were tested on epithelial (buccal) and sperm cells, as well as on touched items. Single cells were successfully collected but fingerprints were swabbed in their entirety to account for the extracellular DNA of these samples and the poor DNA quality of shed skin flakes. Furthermore, micromanipulation devices, such as the P.A.L.M.® and the Axio Zoom.V16 operated manually or with a robotic arm aureka®, were compared for their effectiveness in collecting cells. The P.A.L.M.® was suitable for single cell isolation when smeared on membrane slides. Manual or robotic manipulations, by utilizing the Axio Zoom.V16, have wider applications as they can be used to isolate cells from various substrates such as glass or membrane slides, tapes, or directly from the evidence. Manipulations using the Axio Zoom.V16, either with the robotic arm aureka® or manually, generated similar outcomes which were significantly better than the outcomes by using the P.A.L.M.®. Robotic manipulations using the aureka® produced more consistent results, but operating the aureka® required training and often needed re-calibrations. This made the process of cell manipulations slower than when manually operated. Our preferred method was the manual manipulations as it was fast, cost effective, required little training, but relied on a steady hand of the technician.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Ostojic
- Department of Forensic Biology, Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, N.Y, 10016, USA
| | - Craig O'Connor
- Department of Forensic Biology, Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, N.Y, 10016, USA
| | - Elisa Wurmbach
- Department of Forensic Biology, Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York, N.Y, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2020; 47:102307. [PMID: 32447230 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Latent fingerprints are commonly found in crime scenes, and currently used in forensic analysis to obtain STR profiles from DNA recovered from finger contact. Analysis of STR profiles obtained from touch DNA has been very useful to elucidate crimes and the extraction method may be determinant for the recovery of genetic material collected from different surfaces. This study aimed to verify and compare the efficiency of two different extraction kits for processing touch DNA samples obtained from fingerprints deposited on computer keyboards, knife handles and exterior door handles and steering wheels of cars. One hundred and four experiments were conducted to simulate crime scenes and evaluate the efficiency of two extraction kits for touch DNA samples: the DNA IQ™ System and the Casework Direct Kit (both Promega Corporation). Each experiment was conducted with two individuals in order to obtain a mixture profile. The genetic material deposited was collected by double swab method (Sweet et al. 1997) and DNA quantification was conducted using Quantifiler Trio™ (ThermoFisher Scientific). Samples were amplified by PowerPlex® Fusion System kit (Promega). It was possible to obtain STR profiles for 32 (61.5%) out of the 52 extracted using DNA IQ and 51 (98.1%) out of the 52 extracted using the Casework Direct Kit. Samples extracted by DNA IQ had higher average of quantification values for long targets (>200bp) across all tested surfaces. That seems to be due to an incompatibility between the Quantifiler Trio and the Casework Direct Kit. Samples with positive quantification but without STR profile, as well as samples without quantification but with STR profiles were also observed. Statistical analysis showed that the Casework Direct Kit produced significantly more useful profiles than DNA IQ (p-value = 0.001), since these profiles had more STR markers with allelic correspondence to second donators present in the mixture. This study provides insights about the effect of different surfaces and extraction methods on recovery and generation of STR profiles. Limitations for the quantification step for these samples with a low quantity of DNA were highlighted as well. We concluded that the Casework Direct Kit was much more efficient for processing touch DNA samples than DNA IQ.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wood Z, Mitchell T, Gammon K, Stanton D, Mayers C. Non-destructive means of sampling paper documents for generation of STR profiles. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2019.10.165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
7
|
A review of trace “Touch DNA” deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2019; 39:8-18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
8
|
Falkena K, Hoveling RJ, van Weert A, Lambrechts SA, van Leeuwen TG, Aalders MC, van Dam A. Prediction of DNA concentration in fingermarks using autofluorescence properties. Forensic Sci Int 2019; 295:128-136. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
9
|
Gosch A, Courts C. On DNA transfer: The lack and difficulty of systematic research and how to do it better. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2019; 40:24-36. [PMID: 30731249 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 01/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Since DNA from touched items and surfaces ("touch DNA") can successfully and reliably be analyzed, the question as to how a particular DNA containing sample came to be from where it was recovered is of increasing forensic interest and expert witnesses in court are increasingly challenged to assess for instance whether an incriminatory DNA sample matching to a suspect could have been transferred to the crime scene in an innocent manner and to guess at the probability of such an occurrence. The latter however will frequently entail expressing a subjective probability i.e. simply making a best guess from experience. There is, to the present date, an extensive and complex body of literature on primary, secondary, tertiary and even higher order DNA transfer, its possibility, plausibility, dependency on an array of variables and factors and vast numbers of permutations thereof. However, from our point of view there is a lack of systematic data on DNA transfer with existing research widely varying in quality and relevance. Our aim was, starting from a comprehensive survey of the status quo and appreciating its increasing importance, to in the first part of our review raise consciousness towards the underestimated and insufficiently accounted for complexity of DNA transfer and thus appendant research of forensic scientists serving as expert witnesses in court but also acting in the role of a journal referee to point them to areas of criticism when reviewing a manuscript on DNA transfer. In the second part, we present propositions how to systematize and integrate future research efforts concerning DNA transfer. Also, we present a searchable database providing an extensive overview of the current state of knowledge on DNA transfer, intended to facilitate the identification of relevant studies adding knowledge to a specific question and thus help forensic experts to base their opinion on a broader, more complete and more reproducible selection of studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annica Gosch
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 12, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Cornelius Courts
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 12, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Oorschot RA, Szkuta B, Meakin GE, Kokshoorn B, Goray M. DNA transfer in forensic science: A review. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2019; 38:140-166. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
11
|
Oonk S, Schuurmans T, Pabst M, de Smet LCPM, de Puit M. Proteomics as a new tool to study fingermark ageing in forensics. Sci Rep 2018; 8:16425. [PMID: 30401937 PMCID: PMC6219553 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-34791-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Fingermarks are trace evidence of great forensic importance, and their omnipresence makes them pivotal in crime investigation. Police and law enforcement authorities have exploited fingermarks primarily for personal identification, but crucial knowledge on when fingermarks were deposited is often lacking, thereby hindering crime reconstruction. Biomolecular constituents of fingermark residue, such as amino acids, lipids and proteins, may provide excellent means for fingermark age determination, however robust methodologies or detailed knowledge on molecular mechanisms in time are currently not available. Here, we address fingermark age assessment by: (i) drafting a first protein map of fingermark residue, (ii) differential studies of fresh and aged fingermarks and (iii), to mimic real-world scenarios, estimating the effects of donor contact with bodily fluids on the identification of potential age biomarkers. Using a high-resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics approach, we drafted a characteristic fingermark proteome, of which five proteins were identified as promising candidates for fingermark age estimation. This study additionally demonstrates successful identification of both endogenous and contaminant proteins from donors that have been in contact with various bodily fluids. In summary, we introduce state-of-the-art proteomics as a sensitive tool to monitor fingermark aging on the protein level with sufficient selectivity to differentiate potential age markers from body fluid contaminants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn Oonk
- Netherlands Forensic Institute, Digital Technology and Biometrics, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB, Den Haag, Netherlands. .,Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Chemical Engineering, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom Schuurmans
- Netherlands Forensic Institute, Digital Technology and Biometrics, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | - Martin Pabst
- Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Louis C P M de Smet
- Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Chemical Engineering, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.,Wageningen University & Research, Laboratory of Organic Chemistry, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel de Puit
- Netherlands Forensic Institute, Digital Technology and Biometrics, Laan van Ypenburg 6, 2497 GB, Den Haag, Netherlands. .,Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Chemical Engineering, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ, Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Templeton JE, Taylor D, Handt O, Linacre A. Typing DNA profiles from previously enhanced fingerprints using direct PCR. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2017; 29:276-282. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2016] [Revised: 03/27/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
13
|
Oldoni F, Castella V, Hall D. Shedding light on the relative DNA contribution of two persons handling the same object. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2016; 24:148-157. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Revised: 06/11/2016] [Accepted: 07/05/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
14
|
Min HW, Hong S. Risk of DNA contamination through fingerprint brush, during the dusting of living persons and deceased. ANALYTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY 2016. [DOI: 10.5806/ast.2016.29.2.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
15
|
Oleiwi A, Morris M, Schmerer W, Sutton R. The relative DNA-shedding propensity of the palm and finger surfaces. Sci Justice 2015; 55:329-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2015.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Revised: 04/09/2015] [Accepted: 04/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
16
|
Ostojic L, Klempner SA, Patel RA, Mitchell AA, Axler-DiPerte GL, Wurmbach E. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of single fingerprints in forensic DNA analysis. Electrophoresis 2014; 35:3165-72. [DOI: 10.1002/elps.201400177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Lana Ostojic
- Department of Forensic Biology; Office of Chief Medical Examiner; New York NY USA
| | - Stacey A. Klempner
- Department of Forensic Biology; Office of Chief Medical Examiner; New York NY USA
| | - Rosni A. Patel
- Department of Forensic Biology; Office of Chief Medical Examiner; New York NY USA
| | | | | | - Elisa Wurmbach
- Department of Forensic Biology; Office of Chief Medical Examiner; New York NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kavad (Ahir) A, Karande Y. WITHDRAWN: A Novel approach to magnetic nanoparticles for the development of latent fingerprints. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
|
18
|
DNA transfer: Review and implications for casework. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2013; 7:434-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2012] [Revised: 03/04/2013] [Accepted: 03/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
19
|
A comparison between direct PCR and extraction to generate DNA profiles from samples retrieved from various substrates. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2012; 6:407-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2011] [Revised: 07/27/2011] [Accepted: 08/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
20
|
DNA typing from fluorescent powder dusted latent fingerprints. FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL GENETICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigss.2011.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
21
|
Bille TW, Cromartie C, Farr M. Effects of Cyanoacrylate Fuming, Time After Recovery, and Location of Biological Material on the Recovery and Analysis of DNA from Post-Blast Pipe Bomb Fragments. J Forensic Sci 2009; 54:1059-67. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01128.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
22
|
Raymond JJ, van Oorschot RAH, Gunn PR, Walsh SJ, Roux C. Trace evidence characteristics of DNA: A preliminary investigation of the persistence of DNA at crime scenes. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2009; 4:26-33. [PMID: 19948331 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2008] [Revised: 04/01/2009] [Accepted: 04/06/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The successful recovery of trace or contact DNA is highly variable. It is seemingly dependent on a wide range of factors, from the characteristics of the donor, substrate and environment, to the delay between contact and recovery. There is limited research on the extent of the effect these factors have on trace DNA analysis. This study investigated the persistence of trace DNA on surfaces relevant to the investigation of burglary and robbery offences. The study aimed to limit the number of variables involved to solely determine the effect of time on DNA recovery. Given that it is difficult to control the quantity of DNA deposited during a hand contact, human buffy coat and DNA control solution were chosen as an alternative to give a more accurate measure of quantity. Set volumes of these solutions were deposited onto outdoor surfaces (window frames and vinyl material to mimic burglary and 'bag snatch' offences) and sterile glass slides stored in a closed environment in the laboratory, for use as a control. Trace DNA casework data was also scrutinised to assess the effect of time on DNA recovery from real samples. The amount of DNA recovered from buffy coat on the outdoor surfaces declined by approximately half over two weeks, to a negligible amount after six weeks. Profiles could not be obtained after two weeks. The samples stored in the laboratory were more robust, and full profiles were obtained after six weeks, the longest time period tested in these experiments. It is possible that profiles may be obtained from older samples when kept in similarly favourable conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that the ability to recover DNA from human cells on outdoor surfaces decreases significantly over two weeks. Conversely, no clear trends were identified in the casework data, indicating that many other factors are involved affecting the recovery of trace DNA. Nevertheless, to ensure that valuable trace evidence is not lost, it is recommended that crime scenes are processed expeditiously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Raymond
- Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Müller K, Klein R, Miltner E, Wiegand P. Improved STR typing of telogen hair root and hair shaft DNA. Electrophoresis 2007; 28:2835-42. [PMID: 17702067 DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Today the STR typing of telogen hair and hair shafts is regarded as a challenge. The small DNA quantity in the hair is highly degraded. Another problem are PCR inhibitors in the hair. In particular hair pigments, the melanins, are known to inhibit PCR. Hairs are exposed to sunlight and partly to chemical oxidation processes, which make them even more difficult to analyze. To increase the chances of a correct typing of hair, the small amount of DNA must be successfully isolated and the inhibitors have to be removed or neutralized. Furthermore, miniSTR typing improves the analysis of stains with degraded DNA like it is the case with hair. We introduce a nonorganic extraction method and in addition a miniSTR concept which is promising in typing stains with little and degraded DNA, especially hairs. The miniSTR concept including five database STRs (SE33, VWA, TH01, FGA, D3S1358) and the gender typing system Amelogenin was optimized for the amplification of hair DNA. Compared to commercial STR kits, this approach resulted in considerably higher success rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathrin Müller
- Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Phipps M, Petricevic S. The tendency of individuals to transfer DNA to handled items. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 168:162-8. [PMID: 16930898 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2005] [Revised: 07/07/2006] [Accepted: 07/12/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This research investigates factors influencing the transfer of DNA to handled objects and the process known as 'shedding'. Volunteers were recruited to hold sterile plastic tubes using experiments originally designed by Lowe et al. [A. Lowe, C. Murray, J. Whitaker, G. Tully, P. Gill, The propensity of individuals to deposit DNA and secondary transfer of low level DNA from individuals to inert surfaces, Forensic Sci. Int. 129 (2002) 25-34]. Transferred cellular material was collected from the tubes and STR profiles generated using the AmpFlSTR SGM Plus multiplex with 28 and 34 PCR cycles. Volunteers were asked to hold the tubes with each hand, and to participate in a series of handwashing experiments. The DNA profiling results obtained from the transferred skin cells were compared. An attempt was made to characterize the volunteers as 'good' or 'bad' shedders and to establish which, if any, of the experimental variables were associated with 'good' shedding. Our results suggest that many factors significantly influence shedding, including which hand an individual touches an item with and the time that has elapsed since they last washed their hands. We have found that it may be more complicated than previously reported to categorise a person as being either a 'good' or a 'bad' shedder and that if truly 'good' shedders exist they may be significantly rarer than some have estimated. In the current research no 'good' shedders were observed in a group of 60 volunteers. Given these results, it seems that rather than being applied to individual forensic cases, knowledge of shedding characteristics will be most useful in providing general background data for the interpretation of trace DNA evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Phipps
- Forensic Biology Group, The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Mt Albert Science Centre, Private Bag 92-021, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | | |
Collapse
|