Comparative detectability of bone metastases and impact on therapy of magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy in patients with breast cancer

[High clinical value of bone scintigraphy as a staging method for breast cancer]

BACKGROUND

Bone scintigraphy is a sensitive method for imaging bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Despite its firm establishment in clinical routine, there are hardly any reliable data from larger homogeneous collectives on the value of bone scintigraphy in the context of staging of first diagnosed breast cancer patients.

AIM

The aim of our work was to evaluate the real-life performance of bone scintigraphy as a staging examination in female patients with the initial diagnosis of breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the data of the patients examined in the year 2015 with the first diagnosis of breast cancer at the University Hospital Marburg by bone scintigraphy. In addition a follow-up over a period of 30 months after the first bone scintigraphy was performed. For this purpose we evaluated whether the results of this initial diagnostic could be confirmed in following diagnostic.

RESULTS

207/258 patients showed no suspicious findings in the initial bone scintigraphy, 48 had an unclear finding, which is why 42 patients received further diagnostics. In follow-up, new bone metastases were found in 4 patients, all of these had scintigraphic findings in the primary diagnosis, which were considered "unclear". Depending on the evaluation of the event (suspicious for metastasis/suspicious for metastasis and unclear), the sensitivity was 37.5%/100%, the specificity 100%/80%, the positive predictive value 100%/15.7% and the negative predictive value 98%/100%.

CONCLUSION

By using bone scintigraphy and, if necessary, subsequent further imaging or histological clarification, a clinically significant diagnosis was obtained in 99,2% of the examined patients and confirmed in the follow-up. This result shows the good real-life performance of bone scintigraphy as a staging examination in patients with first diagnosed breast carcinomas.

Burden of metastatic bone disease measured on 18F-NaF PET/computed tomography studies as a prognostic indicator in patients with medullary thyroid cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to assess the association between the burden of metastatic bone disease measured on F-NaF PET/computed tomography (CT) studies and the overall survival (OS) of patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with MTC who performed 18F-NaF PET/CT studies to assess skeletal metastases. The outcomes of the patients (dead or alive) were established based on the last information available on their files. In the studies considered positives for skeletal metastases, the burden of metastatic bone disease was established calculating the fluoride tumor volume (FTV). The FTV was defined using isocontour thresholds based on percentages of maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in the lesions. These percentages varied from lesion to lesion and were established by visual analysis. The patients were divided into three groups as follows: without skeletal metastases (n = 11), with low FTV (≤50 cm; n = 11) and with high FTV (>50cm; n = 9). The Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze the OS in the three groups of patients and the log-rank test was used to determine the statistical significance of the difference between the groups.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in the OS between the group with high FTV and the groups of patients with low FTV (P = 0.036) and without skeletal metastases (P = 0.001). There was not a statistically significant difference between the groups of patients with low FTV and without skeletal metastases (P = 0.147).

CONCLUSION

In patients with MTC, the burden of metastatic bone disease is associated with OS.

Comparison of PET/CT and MRI in the Diagnosis of Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Network Analysis of Diagnostic Studies

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of bone metastasis status of prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming increasingly more important in guiding local and systemic treatment. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have increasingly been utilized globally to assess the bone metastases in PCa. Our meta-analysis was a high-volume series in which the utility of PET/CT with different radioligands was compared to MRI with different parameters in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three databases, including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, were searched to retrieve original trials from their inception to August 31, 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by two independent investigators utilizing Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using an arm-based model. Absolute sensitivity and specificity, relative sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and superiority index, and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to assess the diagnostic value.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies with 2,843 patients and 4,263 lesions were identified. Network meta-analysis reveals that 68Ga-labeled prostate membrane antigen (68Ga-PSMA) PET/CT has the highest superiority index (7.30) with the sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.99, followed by 18F-NaF, 11C-choline, 18F-choline, 18F-fludeoxyglucose (FDG), and 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT. The use of high magnetic field strength, multisequence, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and more imaging planes will increase the diagnostic value of MRI for the detection of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT was performed in the detection of bone metastasis on patient-based level (sensitivity, 0.94 vs. 0.91; specificity, 0.94 vs. 0.96; superiority index, 4.43 vs. 4.56).

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT is recommended for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients. Where available, 3.0-T high-quality MRI approaches 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT should be performed in the detection of bone metastasis.

Comparison of 18F-NaF PET/CT with Other Imaging Methods in the Detection of Bone Metastases in Patients with Medullary Thyroid Cancer: a Report of a Series of 31 Cases

PURPOSE

To compare the 18F-NaF PET/CT studies (18F-NaF) with other imaging methods in the detection of skeletal metastases (SM) in patients with medullary thyroid cancer (MTC).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with MTC who performed 18F-NaF to assess SM. The results of the 18F-NaF were compared with other imaging methods performed for metastasis detection: 99Tc-MDP bone scan (BS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced CT (CT), and 68Ga-Dotatate and 18F-FDG PET/CT studies. A qualitative analysis comparing the 18F-NaF findings with the ones of the other methods was performed, and the results were classified as superior (>), equal (=), and inferior (<).

RESULTS

Eleven patients had no bone metastases detected on any of the imaging methods used. Twenty patients presented SM depicted on 18F-NaF. Of these 20 patients, 12 performed bone scan (in 9 18F-NaF > BS and in 3 18F-NaF = BS), 1 performed 18F-FDG (18F-NaF > 18F-FDG), 4 performed 68Ga-Dotatate (in 2 18F-NaF > 68Ga-Dotatate and in 2 18F-NaF = 68Ga-Dotatate), 20 performed CT of at least one body segment (in 15 18F-NaF = CT and in 5 18F-NaF > CT), and 16 performed MRI of at least one body segment, and in all of them, the 18F-NaF was equal to the MRI. Beside this, the 18F-NaF detected SM in body segments not routinely scanned in MRI and CT.

CONCLUSION

In patients with MTC, the 18F-NaF seems to be equal or superior to other imaging modalities in the detection of SM and allows the analysis of the whole skeletal in a single study.

Imaging diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer

Numerous imaging modalities may be used for the staging of women with advanced breast cancer. Although bone scintigraphy and multiplanar-CT are the most frequently used tests, others including PET, MRI and hybrid scans are also utilised, with no specific recommendations of which test should be preferentially used. We review the evidence behind the imaging modalities that characterise metastases in breast cancer and to update the evidence on comparative imaging accuracy.

False Negative Bone Scintigraphy in a Patient with Primary Breast Cancer: A Possible Transient Phenomenon of Bisphosphonate (Alendronate) Treatment

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in developed countries. Bone is a frequent site of metastatic disease with a stage-dependent incidence. Most women with breast cancer are at risk of osteoporosis due to their age or their breast cancer treatment. Scintigraphy enables imaging of the entire skeleton with high sensitivity but limited specificity. The false positive rate varies from 1.6% to as high as 22%, while the false negative rate varies from 0.96% to 13%.

We observed a 70-year-old woman with a diagnosis of breast cancer and a false negative bone scan despite extensive bone metastases. She was under alendronate treatment for osteoporosis at the time. The false negative finding might be due to a transient phenomenon of alendronate, a bisphosphonate cleared from the plasma by uptake into bone and by renal excretion. 99mTc-MDP is eliminated via the same pathways, and therefore competition may occur between the two substances. Another possible explanation for the false negative bone scan could be that bone metastases, indicating hematogenous tumor spread, are detected earlier by CT scan or MRI than by bone scan. Breast cancer patients under bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis must be carefully evaluated for bone metastasis during radionuclide studies with 99mTc-MDP.

MRI and Bone Scintigraphy for Breast Cancer Bone Metastase: A Meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance image (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases.

Methods

Searching in the databases including PubMed, Embase about the comparative study of MRI and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases during 2000~2018. After we screened further, the extracted effective data were calculated by Meta-Disc 1.4 software.

Results

We obtained 4 articles. The pooled estimates for sensitivity of MRI, BS were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.93 (95% CI, [0.88, 0.97]) respectively; For specificity were 0.99 (95% CI, [0.95, 1.00]) and 0.86 (95% CI, [0.79, 0.92]) respectively. The AUC of SROC curve for MRI and BS were 0.9948 and 0.9675 respectively.

Conclusion

MRI remains to be a satisfactory method for the diagnosis of breast cancer bone metastases and should first be considered for patients.

Bone and Calcified Soft Tissue Metastases of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Better Characterized on 18F-Fluoride PET/CT than on 68Ga-Dotatate PET/CT

Herein, we report a case of a 19-year-old man with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (MEN2B) and medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) diagnosed when he was 12 years of age. The patient had previously undergone total thyroidectomy, cervical radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. He progressed with known bone, pulmonary, and lymph node metastases and was scanned with ¹⁸F-fluoride (¹⁸F-NaF) and ⁶⁸Ga-dotatate whole-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for metastatic disease monitoring. We found that the MTC bone metastases and soft tissue calcified metastases were better characterized on ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT than on ⁶⁸Ga-dotatate PET/CT. This case illustrates that the ¹⁸F-NaF PET/CT could be helpful not only to the detection of bone metastases but also to the detection of calcified soft tissue metastases in patients with MTC.

MRI findings of new uptake in the femoral head detected on follow-up bone scans

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to suggest clinical indications for MRI in patients with breast cancer who have new uptake lesions in the femoral head on follow-up bone scans, by evaluating the incidence and causes of new uptake lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Between January 2002 and July 2013, a total of 145 patients with breast cancer who showed new uptake in the femoral head on follow-up bone scans were included in our study. They were classified into two groups: group 1 consisted of 125 patients without known bone metastases, and group 2 consisted of 20 patients who already had bone metastases other than that in the femoral head. The Fisher exact test was performed for the statistical analysis. Thereafter, we reviewed MR images for characterization of the new abnormal uptake in the femoral head. RESULTS. New uptake lesions in the femoral head were metastatic in only 4.8% (6/125) of group 1 patients but in 75% (15/20) of group 2 patients (p < 0.0001). In both groups, no patient with a single uptake lesion in the femoral head had bone metastasis, whereas all patients with more than five new uptake lesions, including those of the femoral head, showed bone metastasis. Most MRI diagnoses for new uptake in the femoral head were fibrocystic change (15/30, 50%) and subchondral fracture (11/30, 36.7%). CONCLUSION. Most of the new uptake lesions in the femoral head detected on the follow-up bone scans in patients with breast cancer were benign. However, MRI could be considered in patients with known bone metastasis or with multiple new uptake lesions on bone scans.

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: current status, future aspects

Simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is a promising novel technology for oncology diagnosis and staging and neurologic and cardiac applications. Our institution's current research protocol results in a total imaging time of approximately 45 to 70 minutes with simultaneous PET/MR imaging, making this a feasible total body imaging protocol. Further development of MR-based attenuation correction will improve PET quantification. Quantitatively accurate multiparametric PET/MR data sets will likely improve diagnosis of disease and help guide and monitor the therapies for individualized patient care.

Ewing sarcoma dissemination and response to T-cell therapy in mice assessed by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Novel treatment strategies in Ewing sarcoma include targeted cellular therapies. Preclinical in vivo models are needed that reflect their activity against systemic (micro)metastatic disease.

METHODS

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) was used to monitor the engraftment and dissemination of human Ewing sarcoma xenografts in mice. In this model, we evaluated the therapeutic efficacy of T cells redirected against the Ewing sarcoma-associated antigen GD2 by chimeric receptor engineering.

RESULTS

Of 18 mice receiving intravenous injections of VH-64 Ewing sarcoma cells, all developed disseminated tumour growth detectable by WB-MRI. All mice had lung tumours, and the majority had additional manifestations in the bone, soft tissues, and/or kidney. Sequential scans revealed in vivo growth of tumours. Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background signal suppression effectively visualised Ewing sarcoma growth in extrapulmonary sites. Animals receiving GD2-targeted T-cell therapy had lower numbers of pulmonary tumours than controls, and the median volume of soft tissue tumours at first detection was lower, with a tumour growth delay over time.

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging reliably visualises disseminated Ewing sarcoma growth in mice. GD2-retargeted T cells can noticeably delay tumour growth and reduce pulmonary Ewing sarcoma manifestations in this aggressive disease model.

Imaging bone metastases in breast cancer: evidence on comparative test accuracy

BACKGROUND

Numerous imaging modalities may be used to detect bone metastases (BM) in women with breast cancer.

METHODS

Systematic evidence review, including quality appraisal, of studies reporting on comparative imaging accuracy for detection of BM from breast cancer.

RESULTS

Eligible studies (N = 16) included breast cancer subjects who had imaging evaluation for suspected BM or for staging/restaging in suspected local or distant relapse. Median prevalence of BM was 34.0% (range 10.0%-66.7%). There was substantial heterogeneity in the quality of reference standards and in the prevalence of BM, which could account for some of the differences in reported comparative accuracy. Most frequently, bone scan (BS) was compared with newer imaging modalities in subjects selected to both tests; therefore, results could be affected by selection bias. There was some evidence that positron emission tomography (PET), and limited evidence that PET/computed tomography (CT), CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may provide small increments in accuracy relative to BS as add-on tests; there was little evidence regarding single photon emission computed tomography or whole-body MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence of enhanced incremental accuracy for some of the above-mentioned tests where used as add-on in subjects selected to more than one imaging modality, with little evidence to support their application as a replacement to BS in first-line imaging of BM. PET/CT appears to have high accuracy and is recommended for further evaluation.

Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare (18)FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy (BS) for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

METHODS

Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1995 to January 2010. Software was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC).

RESULTS

67 articles consisting of 145 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. On per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 89.7%, 72.9%, 90.6% and 86.0% respectively. PET=MRI>BS>CT. ("="indicated no significant difference, P > 0.05; ">" indicated significantly higher, P < 0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 96.8%, 94.8%, 95.4% and 81.4% respectively. PET = CT = MRI>BS. On per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 86.9%, 77.1%, 90.4% and 75.1% respectively. PET = MRI>BS>CT. The pooled specificity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 97.0%, 83.2%, 96.0% and 93.6% respectively. PET>MRI>BS>CT.

CONCLUSION

PET and MRI were found to be comparable and both significantly more accurate than CT and BS for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI and whole-body CT in stage III/IV malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND

Malignant melanoma (MM) is dramatically increasing in light-skinned populations worldwide. Staging and regular follow-up examinations are essential. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of whole-body MRI with the standard diagnostic algorithm (whole-body CT and brain MRI) in patients with stage III/IV MM.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A group of 50 consecutively admitted patients with stage III/IV MM were included in the study. Whole-body CT and brain MRI scans were performed. Additionally, all patients underwent a whole-body MRI (1.5 Tesla Magnetom Avanto, Siemens Healthcare Sector, Erlangen). The findings were compared on a lesion-by-lesion basis as part of clinical routine follow-up.

RESULTS

33 patients received a follow-up CT and were evaluated. Overall, 824 lesions were detected. The sensitivity of whole-body MRI was observer-dependent. MRI was slightly less sensitive than CT according to the findings of the two most experienced observers (73.4 % vs. 78.2 %, p = 0.0744). CT was significantly more sensitive in the detection of small (1-5 mm) pulmonary nodules (2.9 % vs. 66.9 %, p < 0.0001). Yet overall, MRI was significantly more specific than CT (83.4 % vs. 50.4 %, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Whole-body MRI in compliance with standard requirements for the observers (high level of experience) should be considered as an appropriate alternative to CT without ionizing radiation, particularly for young patients with advanced MM.

A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic value of (18)FDG-PET, MRI, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Web of Knowledge, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review databases were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1995 to January 2010. Inclusion criteria was as follows: (18)FDG-PET, MRI or (99m)Tc-MDP BS was performed to detect bone metastases (the number of published CT studies was inadequate for meta-analysis and therefore could not be included in this study); sufficient data were presented to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table; histopathological analysis and/or close clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 6 months were used as the reference standard. Two reviewers independently assessed potentially eligible studies and extracted relevant data. A software program called "META-DiSc" was used to obtain the pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and the *Q index for each modality.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles consisting of 23 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for MRI (97.1%) were significantly higher than those for PET (83.3%) and BS (87.0%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and BS (P <0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET (94.5%) and MRI (97.0%) were both significantly higher than those for BS (88.1%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and MRI (P >0.05). The pooled DOR estimates for MRI (298.5) were significantly higher than those for PET (82.1%) and BS (49.3%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and BS (P >0.05). The SROC curve for MRI showed better diagnostic accuracy than those for PET and BS. The SROC curve for PET was better than that for BS. The*Q index for MRI (0.935), PET (0.922), and BS (0.872) showed no significant difference (P ≥0.05). On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for BS (87.8%) were significantly higher than those for PET (52.7%; P <0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET (99.6%) were significantly higher than those for BS (96.1%; P <0.05).The pooled DOR estimates for PET (283.3) were significantly higher than those for BS (66.8%; P <0.05). The SROC curve for PET showed better diagnostic accuracy than that for BS. The*Q index for PET (0.941) was significantly higher than that for BS (0.893; P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be better than (18)FDG-PET and BS for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer on a per-patient basis. On a per-lesion basis, (18)FDG-PET had lower sensitivity, higher specificity, a higher DOR, and a higher *Q index than BS.

Comparison of diffusion-weighted whole body MRI and skeletal scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate or breast carcinoma

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background whole body signal suppression (DWIBS) with skeletal scintigraphy for the diagnosis and differentiation of skeletal lesions in patients suffering from prostate or breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A diagnostic cohort of 36 patients was included in skeletal scintigraphy and 1.5 T DWIBS MRI. Based on morphology and signal intensity patterns, two readers each identified and classified independently, under blinded conditions, all lesions into three groups: (1) malignant, (2) unclear if malignant or benign and (3) benign. Finally, for the definition of the gold standard all available imaging techniques and follow-up over a minimum of 6 months were considered.

RESULTS

Overall, 45 circumscribed bone metastases and 107 benign lesions were found. DWIBS performed significantly better in detecting malignant skeletal lesions in patients with more than 10 lesions (sensitivity: 0.97/0.91) compared to skeletal scintigraphy (sensitivity: 0.48/0.42). No statistical difference could be found between DWIBS (0.58/0.33) and skeletal scintigraphy (0.67/0.58) in the sensitivity values for malignant skeletal lesions in patients with less than 5 lesions. For benign lesions, scintigraphy scored best with a sensitivity of 0.93/0.87 compared to 0.20/0.13 for DWIBS. Interobserver agreement with Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated as 0.784 in the case of scintigraphy and 0.663 for DWIBS.

CONCLUSION

With respect to staging, in prostate and breast carcinoma, the DWIBS technique is not superior to skeletal scintigraphy, but ranks equally. However, in the cases with many bone lesions, markedly more metastases could be discovered using the DWIBS technique than skeletal scintigraphy.

Whole-body MRI for detecting metastatic bone tumor: diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted images

PURPOSE

We assessed the diagnostic value of whole body magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (WB-MRI) using diffusion-weighted images (DWI) for detecting bone metastasis and compared it with that of skeletal scintigraphy (SS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with malignancies (breast cancer, 17 patients; prostate cancer, 9; and one patient each, thyroid cancer, liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma) underwent both WB-MRI and SS to detect bone metastasis. All patients were followed more than 6 months by MR imaging, SS, or computed tomographic (CT) examination. For WB-MRI, patients were placed in feet-first supine position with table-top extender and quadrature body coil. We acquired DWI (axial plane from lower neck to proximal femur) (single shot short TI inversion-recovery [STIR]: repetition time [TR] 6243/echo time [TE] 59/inversion time [TI] 180 ms; b value: 600 s/mm(2); 5-mm slice thickness; 112 x 112 matrix), T(1)-weighted fast spin echo (T(1)WI), and STIR (sagittal plane of total spine images and coronal plane of whole body images) images. Four blinded readers independently and separately interpreted images of combined MR sequences of T(1)WI+STIR (session 1) and T(1)WI+STIR+DWI (session 2).

RESULTS

In 10 of 30 patients, we detected a total of 52 metastatic bone lesions; in the other 20, follow-up examinations confirmed no metastatic bone lesions. For these 52 lesions, for session 2, the mean sensitivity was 96% and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 98%. Those values were superior to those of session 1 (sensitivity: 88%; PPV: 95%) and those of SS (sensitivity: 96%; PPV: 94%).

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI that included DWI was useful for detecting bone metastasis.

Imaging medullary thyroid carcinoma with persistent elevated calcitonin levels

PURPOSE

Because calcitonin level remains elevated after initial treatment in many medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) patients without evidence of disease in the usual imaging work-up, there is a need to define optimal imaging procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-five consecutive elevated calcitonin level MTC patients were enrolled to undergo neck and abdomen ultrasonography (US); neck, chest, and abdomen spiral computed tomography (CT); liver and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); bone scintigraphy; and 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan (PET).

RESULTS

Fifty patients underwent neck US, CT, and PET, and neck recurrence was demonstrated in 56, 42, and 32%, respectively. Lung and mediastinum lymph node metastases in the 55 patients were demonstrated in 35 and 31% by CT and in 15 and 20% by PET. Liver imaging with MRI, CT, US, and PET in 41 patients showed liver in 49, 44, 41, and 27% patients, respectively. Bone metastases in 55 patients were demonstrated in 35% by PET, 40% by bone scintigraphy, and 40% by MRI; bone scintigraphy was complementary with MRI for axial lesions but superior for the detection of peripheral lesions. Ten patients had no imaged tumor site despite elevated calcitonin level (median 196 pg/ml; range 39-816). FDG uptake in neoplastic foci was higher in progressive patients but with a considerable overlap with stable ones.

CONCLUSION

The most efficient imaging work-up for depicting MTC tumor sites would consist of a neck US, chest CT, liver MRI, bone scintigraphy, and axial skeleton MRI. FDG PET scan appeared to be less sensitive and of low prognostic value.

MRI and (18)FDG-PET in the assessment of bone marrow infiltration of the spine in cancer patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of MRI and (18)FDG-PET in bone marrow infiltration of the spine due to metastases of solid tumours and lymphoma in cancer patients. In 35 cancer patients (solid tumours n = 26, lymphoma n = 9) MRI of the spine and (18)FDG-PET were reviewed and the detectability of metastases, infiltration of the spine, extent of disease, and therapeutic implications were compared. In 8/35 cases (23%) imaging technique showed concordantly no bone marrow infiltration. In 19/35 patients (54%), both MRI and (18)FDG-PET revealed bone marrow infiltration of the axial skeleton. In 12/19 patients (63%), MRI showed more extensive disease which lead to subsequent therapy. The imaging findings of MRI and (18)FDG-PET were discordant in 8/35 cases (23%). (18)FDG-PET was false positive in two patients. In six patients, (18)FDG-PET failed to detect bone metastases and bone marrow infiltration of the spine, which was detected by MRI and proven by clinical follow-up with subsequent therapy in two cases. MRI is more sensitive and specific than (18)FDG-PET detecting bone marrow metastases and infiltration of the spine and has a great impact in staging cancer patients.

Whole-body MRI in the detection of bone marrow infiltration in patients with plasma cell neoplasms in comparison to the radiological skeletal survey

To compare the diagnostic value of whole-body MRI versus radiological skeletal survey (RSS) in staging patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN) and to evaluate the possible therapeutic impact of the replacement of RSS by whole-body MRI. Fifty-four patients with PCN [multiple myeloma (MM), n=47; monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS), n=7] were studied by whole-body MRI and RSS in a monocenter prospective analysis from August 2002 to May 2004. The MRIs were performed using a rolling table platform "AngioSURF" for unlimited field of view with a 1.5-T system (Magnetom Sonata/Maestro Class, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany). A coronal STIR sequence (TR5500-4230/TE102-94/TI160) was used for imaging of the different body regions, including the head, neck, thorax, abdomen, pelvis and upper and lower extremities. The RSS consisted of eight different projections of the axial and appendicular skeleton. In 41/54 (74%) patients, the results of the whole-body MRI and RSS were concordant. In 11/54 (20%) patients, both imaging techniques were negative. Bone involvement was observed in 30/54 (55%) patients; however, whole-body MRI revealed this more extensively than the RSS in 27/30 (90%) patients with concordant positive imaging findings. In 3/30 (10%) patients, both imaging techniques demonstrated a similar extent of bone marrow infiltration. In 10/54 (19%) patients, the whole-body MRI was superior to RSS in detecting bone marrow infiltration, whereas the RSS was negative. In 3/54 (6%) patients, the RSS was proven to be false positive by the clinical course, whereas the whole-body MRI was truly negative. Whole-body MRI is a fast and highly effective method for staging PCN patients by the use of a rolling table platform. Moreover, it is more sensitive and specific than RSS and reveals bone marrow infiltration and extensive disease more reliably. Therefore, whole-body MRI should be performed as an additional method of exactly staging PCN patients and - with more data in the field - may even prove to be an alternate and more sensitive staging procedure than RSS in PCN patients.

Diagnostic value of MRI in comparison to scintigraphy, PET, MS-CT and PET/CT for the detection of metastases of bone

The initial localization of metastases in the bone in patients with solid tumors has a relatively good prognosis in comparison with visceral metastasization. The early detection of bone marrow metastases allows for a rapid initiation of therapy and a subsequent reduction in the morbidity rate. Modern MRI is superior to the 30-year-old skeletal scintigraphy and bone marrow scintigraphy with respect to sensitivity, specificity, as well as the extent of osteal metastasis. MRI provides substantial, therapy-relevant additional information. MSCT plays an important role in the management of cancer patients in clinical routine and gives an excellent survey of the axial skeleton by demonstrating osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases. Extensive comparative studies of MRI with 18F-FDG-PET and 18F-fluoride-PET have not yet been carried out. Whole body MRI is a very promising new staging method for the oncological diagnosis of solid tumors and the detection of osteal metastases. The adoption of 18F-FDG-PET and 18F-fluoride-PET FDG as well as the side by side PET-CT image fusion and the two in one PET/CT examinations appears to be slightly less sensitive to whole body MRI in the detection of osteal metastases. Larger, prospective multicenter studies are necessary to establish these as new, promising methods for the detection of osteal metastases.

[Whole-body MRI in comparison to skeletal scintigraphy for detection of skeletal metastases in patients with solid tumors]

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) as a new and rapid examination technique with skeletal scintigraphy for detection of skeletal metastases from solid tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 129 patients with solid malignant tumors, WB-MRI was performed for individual comparison with skeletal scintigraphy. Examinations were performed with the innovative AngioSURF rolling table with integrated phased array surface coil and coronary TIRM sequences for different body regions.

RESULTS

The results for WB-MRI and skeletal scintigraphy were concordant in 81% of the cases, whereby both procedures excluded skeletal metastases in 43%. WB-MRI and skeletal scintigraphy demonstrated skeletal metastases in 38% of the cases, whereby WB-MRI provided more comprehensive findings in 45%. In 12% of the cases, skeletal scintigraphy was superior to WB-MRI and in 19% the findings were discordant, whereby WB-MRI detected skeletal metastases in 15 cases which had not been found on skeletal scintigraphy. In nine cases, skeletal scintigraphy was positive when the WB-MRI was negative. In 60% of the cases, WB-MRI evidenced tumor-associated findings.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI represents a promising new staging technique for detection of skeletal metastases, which is more sensitive in many cases than skeletal scintigraphy in detecting and assessing the extent of skeletal metastases-and tumor-associated findings that are relevant for treatment strategy.

Whole Body MRI for Detecting Metastatic Bone Tumor: Comparison with Bone Scintigrams

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness of whole body MRI (WB-MRI [magnetic resonance imaging]) and bone scintigram (BS) at detecting bone metastasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

WB-MRI was performed on 16 patients for detecting bone metastasis (6 breast carcinoma, 7 prostatic carcinoma, 1 renal cell carcinoma [RCC], 1 hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], and 1 primary unknown). BS was also performed in all cases. Patients were placed on a table top extender (Philips Medical Systems). The maximal longitudinal field of view (FOV) was 200 cm. At first, the total spine was imaged in the sagittal plane with a three-station approach for two image sets (fast spin-echo [SE] T1-weighted images [T1WI] and short tau inversion recovery [STIR] images). The whole body was then imaged in the coronal plane with a seven-station approach for two image sets (fast field echo [FFE] T1WI and STIR). Total examination time, including patient positioning, was within 40 min. Three independent radiologists interpreted the imaging data.

RESULTS

WB-MRI identified 5 cases of 24 lesions as bone metastasis, while BS identified 3 cases of 25 lesions. Concordance between WB-MRI and BS was seen in 3 cases of 22 lesions (81%). For two cases of 2 lesions, which were identified only with WB-MRI, the lesions were located in the sacrum and thoracic spine. For one case of 3 lesions, which was identified only with BS, the lesions were located in the skull and rib.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI was an excellent method for screening bone metastasis, especially the vertebral body.

The value of bone marrow scintigraphy using 99mTc monoclonal antigranulocyte antibodies in complement to bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastases from primary breast cancer

This prospective study evaluates bone marrow scintigraphy (BMS) in detecting bone metastases from primary breast cancer when performed in complement to conventional bone scan (BS). Sixty women predominantly with low-stage disease underwent BS followed by BMS within 1-35 days using BW250/183 antigranulocyte antibodies. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to compare BS to BS+BMS on a patient-by-patient basis using a 'gold standard' composed of subsequent computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, X-ray or BS examinations and at least a 12 month follow-up. Metastases were present in eight out of 60 patients (13%). Specificity was improved by BS+BMS compared to BS alone (90%, 65%) as well as positive predictive value (62%, 27%), accuracy (87%, 72%), positive (10.4, 2.4) and negative (0.20, 0.00) likelihood ratios. Sensitivity (100%, 88%) and negative predictive value (100%, 97%) were similar for BMS+BS and BS alone. As a result of BMS, clinical management was modified in 15 patients (25%). In conclusion, BMS supplements BS by improving specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy in detecting breast cancer bone metastases. The ROC curves show improved specificity for BS+BMS at the same sensitivity compared to BS alone. Consequently, BMS may be useful in low-stage subjects with positive or equivocal BS for metastases.

Comparative diagnostic value and therapeutic relevance of magnetic resonance imaging and bone marrow scintigraphy in patients with metastatic solid tumors of the axial skeleton

PURPOSE

To evaluate the comparative impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone marrow scintigraphy (BMS) in bone marrow metastases of solid tumors.

METHODS

In 20 patients with solid tumors MRI of the axial skeleton and whole-body BMS were retrospectively reviewed. Detectability of metastases, extent of disease and therapeutic implications were assessed.

RESULTS

In 15/20 (75%) patients MRI and BMS concordantly revealed bone marrow metastases of the axial skeleton. In nine of these 15 patients (60%) MRI showed more metastases. Local radiotherapy or surgery was performed in seven of these cases (78%). BMS detected additional metastases of the appendicular skeleton in 8/15 (53%) patients. In 4/20 cases (20%) the imaging findings were discordant. In three patients with degenerative changes (n=2) or lipoma (n=1) BMS was false positive. In another patient BMS failed to detect metastases proven by MRI and clinical follow-up resulting in subsequent radiation therapy. One patient had normal bone marrow.

CONCLUSION

MRI appears to be more sensitive and specific in the detection of bone marrow metastases in the axial skeleton and is of clinical importance for subsequent local therapy.