Status Epilepticus

Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for adult convulsive status epilepticus: a multicentre non-inferiority randomised control trial

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is crucial. Although fosphenytoin (FPHT) is recommended as a second-line treatment, levetiracetam (LEV) reportedly has similar efficacy, but higher safety. Therefore, we herein compared LEV with FPHT in adult SE.

METHODS

We initiated a multicentre randomised control trial in emergency departments with adult patients with convulsive SE. Diazepam was initially administered, followed intravenously by FPHT at 22.5 mg/kg or LEV at 1000-3000 mg. The primary outcome was assigned as the seizure cessation rate within 30 min of the administration of the study drug.

RESULTS

A total of 176 adult patients with SE were enrolled (82 FPHT and 94 LEV), and 3 were excluded from the full analysis set. Seizure cessation rates within 30 min were 83.8% (67/80) in the FPHT group and 89.2% (83/93) in the LEV group. The difference in these rates was 5.5% (95% CI -4.7 to 15.7, p=0.29). The non-inferiority of LEV to FPHT was confirmed with p<0.001 by the Farrington-Manning test. No significant differences were observed in the seizure recurrence rate or intubation rate within 24 hours. Serious adverse events developed in three patients in the FPHT group and none in the LEV group (p=0.061).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of LEV was similar to that of FPHT for adult SE following the administration of diazepam. LEV may be recommended as a second-line treatment for SE along with phenytoin/FPHT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

jRCTs031190160.

Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus: Prognosis and Recent Advances in Management

Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency with high morbidity and mortality. It is defined as “status epilepticus (SE) that continues or recurs 24 hours or more after the onset of anesthesia, including those cases in which SE recurs on the reduction or withdrawal of anesthesia.” This condition is resistant to normal protocols used in the treatment of status epilepticus and exposes patients to increased risks of neuronal death, neuronal injury, and disruption of neuronal networks if not treated in a timely manner. It is mainly seen in patients with severe acute onset brain injury or presentation of new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE). The mortality, neurological deficits, and functional impairments are significant depending on the duration of status epilepticus and the resultant brain damage. Research is underway to find the cure for this devastating neurological condition. In this review, we will discuss the wide range of therapies used in the management of SRSE, provide suggestions regarding its treatment, and comment on future directions. The therapies evaluated include traditional and alternative anesthetic agents with antiepileptic agents. The other emerging therapies include hypothermia, steroids, immunosuppressive agents, electrical and magnetic stimulation therapies, emergent respective epilepsy surgery, the ketogenic diet, pyridoxine infusion, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and magnesium infusion. To date, there is a lack of robust published data regarding the safety and effectiveness of various therapies, and there continues to be a need for large randomized multicenter trials comparing newer therapies to treat this refractory condition.

Levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment after diazepam for status epilepticus: study protocol for a multicenter non-inferiority designed randomized control trial

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is an emergency condition for which rapid and secured cessation is important. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin, the prodrug of phenytoin with less severe adverse effects, have been recommended as second-line treatments. However, fosphenytoin causes severe adverse events, such as hypotension and arrhythmia. Levetiracetam reportedly has similar efficacy and higher safety for SE; however, evidence to support its use for adult SE is lacking. In the present study, a non-inferiority designed multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) is being conducted to compare levetiracetam with fosphenytoin after diazepam as a second-line treatment for SE.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, and open-label RCT is conducted in emergency departments. Between December 23, 2019, and March 31, 2023, 176 patients with convulsive SE transported to an emergency room will be randomized into a fosphenytoin group and levetiracetam group at a ratio of 1:1. The definition of SE is "continuous seizures longer than 5 min or discrete seizures longer than 2 min with intervening consciousness disturbance." In both groups, diazepam is initially administered at 1-20 mg, followed by intravenous fosphenytoin at 22.5 mg/kg or intravenous levetiracetam at 1000-3000 mg. The primary outcome is the seizure cessation rate within 30 min. Seizure recurrence within 24 h, severe adverse events, and intubation rate within 24 h are secondary outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The present study was approved and conducted as an initiative study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine. If non-inferiority is identified, the society will pursue an application for the national health insurance coverage of levetiracetam for SE via a public knowledge-based application.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs031190160 . Registered on December 13, 2019.

Levetiracetam vs. Fosphenytoin for Second-Line Treatment of Status Epilepticus: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database

Objective: Status epilepticus is a major emergency condition. The choice of antiepileptic drugs for second-line treatment after benzodiazepine remains controversial, including levetiracetam vs. fosphenytoin. We compare the safety of intravenous levetiracetam and fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment in patients with status epilepticus using a nationwide database.

Methods: An observational study conducted with the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database identified adult patients who had been admitted for status epilepticus and who had received intravenous diazepam on the day of admission from March 1, 2011 to March 31, 2018. Patients who received intravenous levetiracetam on the day of admission were defined as the levetiracetam group and those who received intravenous fosphenytoin on the day of admission were defined as the fosphenytoin group. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes obtained for the levetiracetam and fosphenytoin groups.

Results: The analysis examined data of 5,667 patients. Overall, 1,403 (25%) patients received levetiracetam; 4,264 (75%) received fosphenytoin. One-to-one propensity score matching created 1,363 matched pairs. No significant difference was found in in-hospital mortality (5.2 vs. 5.1%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.46). The proportion of vasopressor use on the day of admission was significantly lower for the levetiracetam group than for the fosphenytoin group (3.2 vs. 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.92). No significant difference was found in other secondary outcomes including total hospitalization cost.

Conclusion: Levetiracetam was related to significantly reduced vasopressor use on the day of admission than that found for fosphenytoin, in adult status epilepticus.

Phenytoin versus fosphenytoin for second-line treatment of status epilepticus: propensity score matching analysis using a nationwide inpatient database

PURPOSE

For status epilepticus, the choice of antiepileptic drugs for second-line treatment after benzodiazepine remains controversial: phenytoin or fosphenytoin are recommended, however, it has been unknown which is better. Using a nationwide database, we compared the efficacy and safety of them.

METHOD

An observational study conducted with the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database identified adult patients who had been admitted for status epilepticus and who had received intravenous diazepam on the day of admission from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015. Propensity score matching was applied to compare outcomes of the phenytoin and fosphenytoin groups.

RESULTS

The analysis examined data of 5265 patients: 2969 patients received phenytoin; 2296 received fosphenytoin, on the day of admission. One-to-one propensity score matching created 1871 matched pairs. No significant difference was found for vasopressor use on the day of admission (4.2 % vs. 4.4 %; odds ratio 1.07; 95 % confidence intervals 0.77-1.48; p = 0.69), or for mechanical ventilation on the day of admission, in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, or total hospitalization cost. Higher age, comorbidity of cardiac diseases and lower body mass index were associated significantly with increased vasopressor use, whereas the dose of phenytoin equivalents and the choice of fosphenytoin were not.

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide observational study found no evidence that fosphenytoin provides higher efficacy or safety than phenytoin for treatment of status epilepticus in adults after diazepam. Age, cardiac disease and low body mass index were identified as independent risk factors for vasopressor use in both phenytoin and fosphenytoin.

Changes in Real-world Practice Patterns of Antiepileptic Drugs for Status Epilepticus: A Nationwide Observational Study in Japan

Intravenous (i.v.) phenytoin/fosphenytoin is recommended as the second-line therapy of antiepileptic drugs in patients with status epilepticus (SE). i.v. Levetiracetam is regarded as an effective and safe equivalent with i.v. phenytoin/fosphenytoin. However, i.v. levetiracetam is not covered by public health insurance for SE in most countries. For this study, we performed the real-world practice pattern survey of antiepileptic drugs for status epilepticus using the nationwide inpatient database. We used the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan and identified all cases of emergency admission attributable to status epilepticus from March 2011 through March 2018. We described the patient characteristics and practice pattern of antiepileptic drugs. The analysis conducted for this study examined 31,472 cases. As the second-line therapy, the use of i.v. levetiracetam increased rapidly from 2016; 35% of cases received i.v. levetiracetam in 2017. By contrast, the use of i.v. phenytoin/fosphenytoin decreased from 2016. In-hospital mortality decreased year-by-year. No year-by-year change was observed for deaths within 24 h, length of hospital stay, drug-induced hepatitis, or drug-induced eruption. Although the use of levetiracetam for treatment of SE is not compensated by public health insurance in Japan, i.v. levetiracetam use is increasing dramatically as the second-line SE therapy. We propose that health insurance coverage be extended to include i.v. levetiracetam treatment for SE.

Efficacy of levetiracetam versus fosphenytoin for the recurrence of seizures after status epilepticus

Benzodiazepines are used as first-line treatments for status epilepticus. Fosphenytoin (FPHT) is recommended for second-line therapy; however, intravenous injection of levetiracetam (LEV) may also be effective against status epilepticus. Herein, we compared the efficacy and safety of LEV as a second-line treatment for status epilepticus with FPHT in Japanese patients.Patients with status epilepticus were selected from the database of the Emergency and Critical Care Center of Hitachi General Hospital. The subjects were patients whose status epilepticus was successfully stopped by diazepam, and in whom FPHT or LEV was administered after diazepam. As LEV injections recently became clinically available in Japan, the choice of drug was determined by the treatment period. Thus, 21 patients who were intravenously injected with LEV as a second-line therapy and 42 matched patients (historical controls) who were treated with FPHT (1:2) were selected.The subjects had a mean age of 64.0 ± 2.2 years, and included 48 males and 15 females. The status epilepticus control rates of the FPHT and LEV groups did not differ significantly (81.0% [34/42] vs 85.1% [18/21], respectively; P  =  .69). As for serious adverse events, a reduction in blood pressure was observed in the FPHT group, but not in the LEV group. The oral anticonvulsant switching rates of the 2 groups were similar, but the same-drug switching rates of the FPHT and LEV groups were 8.1% and 77.8%, respectively.The efficacy of intravenous LEV injections after status epilepticus was equivalent to that of FPHT, and the incidence of adverse events was lower in the LEV group. LEV is effective and safe at preventing recurrent seizures after status epilepticus following benzodiazepine treatment.

Hydroalcoholic extract of Emblica officinalis protects against kainic acid-induced status epilepticus in rats: evidence for an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective intervention

CONTEXT

Emblica officinalis (Euphorbiaceae), commonly known as amla, is traditionally used for central nervous system (CNS) disorders.

OBJECTIVE

In the present study, the effect of standardized hydroalcoholic extract of E. officinalis fruit (HAEEO), an Indian medicinal plant with potent antioxidant activity, was studied against kainic acid (KA)-induced seizures, cognitive deficits and on markers of oxidative stress.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Rats were administered KA (10 mg/kg, i.p.) and observed for behavioral changes, incidence, and latency of convulsions over 4 h. The rats were thereafter sacrificed for estimation of oxidative stress parameters: thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and glutathione (GSH). The proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) was also determined in the rat brain.

RESULTS

Pretreatment with HAEEO (500 and 700 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly (P < 0.001) increased the latency of seizures as compared with the vehicle-treated KA group. HAEEO significantly prevented the increase in TBARS levels and ameliorated the fall in GSH. Furthermore, HAEEO dose-dependently attenuated the KA-induced increase in the TNF-α level in the brain. HAEEO also significantly improved the cognitive deficit induced by KA, as evidenced by increased latency in passive avoidance task.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

HAEEO at the dose of 700 mg/kg, i.p., was most effective in suppressing KA-induced seizures, cognitive decline, and oxidative stress in the brain. These neuroprotective effects may be due to the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of HAEEO.

Protective effect of vineatrol against kainic acid induced seizures, oxidative stress and on the expression of heat shock proteins in rats

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of an antioxidant vineatrol against kainic acid-induced seizures, markers of oxidative stress and expression of heat shock protein in brain. In rats, kainic acid (10 mg/kg i.p.) induced long lasting seizures, associated behavioral symptoms and brain damage and significantly increased level of brain malondialdehyde (MDA) (283 +/- 42 nmol/g wet tissue) as compared to control (173.3 +/- 10.2 nmol/g wet tissue). Pretreatment (5 min) of vineatrol (10, 20 and 40 mg/kg i.p.) could not inhibit the convulsions though the latency was significantly increased with 20 and 40 mg/kg. However when the drug was administrated 5 min prior and repeated at 30 and 90 min after kainic acid there was significant reduction in incidence of convulsions. The brain MDA levels were also found to be significantly attenuated, however the glutathione levels were not different in control, kainic acid and vineatrol treated animals. Expression of heat shock protein (HSP) 72 was observed in the kainic acid per se group indicating neurotoxicity as compared to the control group and was reduced by vineatrol. The study suggests the potential use of vineatrol in status epilepticus.

Pediatric central nervous system infections and inflammatory white matter disease

This article reviews the immunology of the central nervous system and the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of children with viral or parainfectious encephalitis. The emphasis is on the early recognition of treatable causes of viral encephalitis (herpes simplex virus), and the diagnosis and treatment of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis are described in detail. Laboratory and imaging findings in the two conditions also are described.

Levetiracetam protects against kainic acid-induced toxicity

We investigated the Levetiracetam (LVT) ability to protect the brain against kainic acid (KA) induced neurotoxicity. Brain injury was induced by intraperitoneal administration of KA (10 mg/kg). Sham brain injury rats were used as controls. Animals were randomized to receive either LVT (50 mg/kg) or its vehicle (1 ml/kg) 30 min. before KA administration. Animals were sacrificed 6 hours after KA injection to measure brain malonildialdehyde (MDA), glutathione levels (GSH) and the mRNA for interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) in the cortex and in the diencephalon. Behavioral changes were also monitored. Intraperitoneal administration of LVT decreased significantly MDA in the cortex (KA + vehicle = 0.25 +/- 0.03 nmol/mg protein; KA + LVT = 0.13 +/- 0.01 nmol/mg protein; P < 0.005), and in the diencephalons (KA + vehicle = 1,01 +/- 0.2 nmol/mg protein; KA + LVT = 0,33 +/- 0,08 nmol/mg protein; P < 0.005), prevented the brain loss of GSH in both cortex (KA + vehicle = 5 +/- 1 micromol/g protein; KA + LVT = 15 +/- 2 micromol/g protein; P < 0.005) and diencephalons (KA + vehicle = 9 +/- 0.8 micromol/g protein; KA + LVT = 13 +/- 0.3 micromol/g protein; P < 0.05), reduced brain IL-1beta mRNA and markedly controlled seizures. Histological analysis showed a reduction of cell damage in LVT treated samples. The present data indicate that LVT displays neuro-protective effects against KA induced brain toxicity and suggest that these effects are mediated, at least in part, by inhibition of lipid peroxidation.

Barbiturates for acute neurological and neurosurgical emergencies--do they still have a role?

A number of clinical studies have reported poor clinical outcomes for patients treated with barbiturate therapy in acute neurological and neurosurgical emergencies. Barbiturate therapy, as currently practised with thiopentone and pentobarbitone at least, is also associated with a prolonged post-infusion period of clinical unresponsiveness. Hence, the popularity of barbiturate therapy for sedation of critically ill neurological and neurosurgical patients has declined over the past decade. A retrospective study of traumatic brain injury patients treated at the Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, with high-dose thiopentone therapy between 1987 and 1997 has found disappointing results with a 1-month mortality outcome of 50% (14 of 28 patients). Nevertheless, barbiturate therapy remains a consideration for patients with severe cranial trauma in whom preferred treatments have failed to control intracranial or cerebral perfusion pressures. More favourable results ( approximately 10% 1-month mortality rate) were encountered for patients with refractory vasospasm complicating subarachnoid haemorrhage or intracerebral haemorrhage complicating supratentorial arteriovenous malformation resection. A well designed, prospective and randomised controlled trial may be of value in further determining the role of barbiturate therapy in acute neurovascular emergencies refractory to standard therapy.

Protective effect of trans-resveratrol against kainic acid-induced seizures and oxidative stress in rats

Overexcitation of excitatory amino acid is an important mechanism in seizure genesis wherein free radicals have recently been suggested to play a critical role. Thus, intervention by antioxidants can be a potential beneficial approach in the treatment of epilepsy. The present study was undertaken to see the effect of trans-resveratrol, a potent antioxidant, against kainic acid-induced seizures, and effect on markers of oxidative stress in brain. Kainic acid, 10 mg/kg ip, induced long-lasting seizures and associated symptoms. The brain level of malondialdehyde (MDA) was found to be significantly raised after kainic acid administration (295 +/- 18 nmol/g wet tissue) as compared to control (195 +/- 26 nmol/g wet tissue). Pretreatment (5 min) of single dose of trans-resveratrol (40 mg/kg i.p.) could not inhibit the convulsions though the latency was significantly increased. When multiple doses of trans-resveratrol were injected in two-dose schedules in different animals (20 and 40 mg/kg ip, 5 min prior and repeated 30 and 90 min after kainic acid), there was significant reduction in incidence of convulsions in both treatment schedules. The brain MDA levels were found to be significantly attenuated in the trans-resveratrol-treated groups (multiple doses of 20 and 40 mg/kg) as compared to the kainic acid alone. However, the glutathione level in control, kainic acid- and trans-resveratrol-treated animals were not significantly different. The protective effect of trans-resveratrol against kainic acid-induced convulsions and the attenuation of raised MDA level suggest the potential use of antioxidants at least as adjunct therapy in epilepsy.

Prolonged thiopentone infusion for neurosurgical emergencies: usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring

Serial serum thiopentone concentrations were measured during and following completion of an intravenous infusion of thiopentone in 20 patients with neurosurgical emergencies. The concentration data from a further 55 patients who had had some such measurements were reviewed retrospectively. The patients received an infusion for longer than 24 hours at a rate adjusted to maintain EEG burst suppression. The data were interpreted in terms of thiopentone pharmacokinetics and used to produce statistical models relating to clinical outcomes. In these patients, the one-month mortality rate following commencement of thiopentone treatment was 20%; the mean durations of pupillary and motor unresponsiveness following cessation of an infusion were 22 and 91 hours, respectively. Predictors of a prolonged duration of motor unresponsiveness included a prolonged duration of pupillary unresponsiveness, a low thiopentone clearance and a high maximum serum concentration of thiopentone. From pooled logistic regression, median effective serum thiopentone concentrations (EC50) were found to be 50 mg x l(-1) for recovery of pupillary responsiveness and 12 mg x l(-1) for the recovery of motor responsiveness. Because prolonged high-dose thiopentone leads to prolonged residual serum concentrations, it is difficult to distinguish the residual pharmacological effects of thiopentone from the clinical condition. This study suggests that, based on EC50 values for responses, monitoring of post-infusion serum thiopentone concentrations may help determine whether a patient's clinical state is due to residual thiopentone pharmacological effects.

Status epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a medical emergency that requires rapid and vigorous treatment to prevent neuronal damage and systemic complications. Failure to diagnose and treat status epilepticus accurately and effectively results in significant morbidity and mortality. Cerebral metabolic decompensation occurs after approximately 30 min of uncontrolled convulsive activity, and the window for treatment is therefore limited. Therapy should proceed simultaneously on four fronts: termination of seizures; prevention of seizure recurrence once status is controlled; management of precipitating causes of status epilepticus; management of the complications. This article reviews current opinions about the classification, aetiology and pathophysiology of adult generalised convulsive status epilepticus and details practical management strategies for treatment of this life-threatening condition.

Status epilepticus arising de novo in hospitalized patients: an analysis of 41 patients

Most of the information on predisposing factors and mortality in status epilepticus (SE) arises from data obtained from patients presenting to the casualty department. However, another population which is frequently seen by consultative neurologists are medically ill patients who develop SE while in hospital. These patients are often notoriously difficult to treat once SE arises. We sought to characterize patients at risk for SE arising when they are hospitalized for other reasons. By doing this, risk factors for developing SE and prognostic indicators might be determined. We retrospectively reviewed records from three urban hospitals in the United States to identify hospitalized patients developing SE over a 1 year period. SE was defined as a clinical seizure lasting 30 minutes or longer, or repeated seizures without recovery. Patients who were admitted in SE or for an epilepsy-related problem, or who were less than 1 year old were excluded from the study. Forty-one patients with in-hospital SE were identified. There were 28 males and 13 females with an age range from 1 to 91 years (mean: 60 years, median: 65 years). The mean interval from hospital admission to the onset of status epilepticus was 26 days. Nineteen (46%) patients had a prior history of either epilepsy or symptomatic seizures, and of these, 10 were inadequately treated as judged by serum anticonvulsant levels at the time SE developed. Focal brain abnormality was present in 26 (63%) patients, the most common of which was stroke (17 patients ). Major metabolic derangements including hypoxia, electrolyte imbalance, hepatic encephalopathy, and sepsis were present in 23 (56%) patients. Eleven (27%) patients were being treated with theophylline preparations at the time SE developed. Mortality in this group of patients with in-hospital SE was 61% (25 deaths), with about one-third dying while in status, and two-thirds dying subsequently in hospital. In this retrospective study, there was no clear relationship between mortality and the duration of SE in this group of patients. In-hospital development of SE is usually related to underlying focal brain abnormality, especially stroke, in combination with systemic metabolic derangement. Prognosis is poor, and appears to be more related to underlying conditions rather than to status duration. More accurate prospective studies are warranted.

Management approaches to prolonged seizures and status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) treatment should proceed on four fronts: termination of SE, prevention of recurrence, management of potential precipitating causes, and management of SE complications and underlying conditions. The intensity of the treatment should reflect the risk to the patient from SE, and drugs likely to depress respiration and blood pressure should initially be avoided. The Veterans Administration cooperative trial showed that when treating overt SE, first-line treatment success rates were: lorazepam 64.9%; phenobarbital 58.2%; diazepam/phenytoin 55.8%; and phenytoin alone 43.6%. The aggregate response rate to second-line agents for patients who did not respond to first-line agents was 7.0%, and it was 2.3% for third-line agents, raising the question of the efficacy of a second and third drug. The recommended treatment for generalized convulsive SE is to begin with lorazepam. As a second-line agent, phenytoin or fosphenytoin, is still recommended if SE control is not achieved within 5 to 7 min. Fosphenytoin achieves a free phenytoin level of about 2 micro/mL in 15 min, as opposed to 25 min with phenytoin itself. Moreover, fosphenytoin is safer and, despite higher cost, it may be cost-effective. High-dose barbiturates, high-dose benzodiazepines, and propofol are employed for major treatment for refractory SE. Patients at this stage should undergo continuous electroencephalogram monitoring. Once SE is controlled, prevention of seizure recurrence should be individualized to each patient. The major complications of generalized convulsive SE (GCSE), rhabdomyolysis and hyperthermia, should be watched for and treated.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in theophylline toxicity

CASE REPORT

A 53-year-old cocaine user was on chronic therapy with theophylline, albuterol, and ipratropium for asthma and nifedipine for hypertension. Acute asthma treatment that increased the serum theophylline to 35 micrograms/mL was associated with tonic clonic seizures followed by bizarre, lateralized posturing. Electroencephalogram seizure activity lasting 10 days was consistent with nonconvulsive status epilepticus, Complex Partial, type II. Theophylline was considered the probable instigator of this underdiagnosed neurologic disorder.

Electrocorticographic changes during generalized convulsive status epilepticus in soman intoxicated rats

Generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) is the most common and potentially most damaging form of status epilepticus (SE). It has been previously reported, in both human GCSE and animal models of GCSE, that the electroencephalographs (EEGs) and electrocorticographs (ECoGs) recorded during GCSE contain an ordered sequence of five identifiable patterns: discrete seizures (phase 1), waxing and waning ictal discharges (phase 2), continuous ictal discharges (phase 3), continuous activity with flat periods (phase 4), and periodic epileptiform discharge on a flat background (phase 5). In this paper, we report the same pattern of ECoG changes in 15 rats exposed to soman, an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor. Phase 1 was observed in 12 of 15 animals, but phases 2-5 were recorded in all the animals. Taken together, these findings suggest that the sequence of EEG changes is independent of the initiating cause, represent a common electrical response to GCSE, and reflect a common underlying neurochemical mechanism.

Status epilepticus in children and adults

Status epilepticus (SE) in children and adults is one of the most common neurology problems confronting the intensivist. Recognition of SE is usually straightforward, but may be complicated by the effects of other diseases or therapies. Emergent treatment is necessary to prevent further brain damage. This article reviews protocols for standard treatments of SE patients and includes recommendations for the management of refractory SE.

Status epilepticus

Generalised convulsive status epilepticus is a medical emergency. Knowledge of the pathophysiology of status epilepticus and the pharmacology of the medications used to treat it allow one to devise a rational protocol for management. Anticipation of medical complications facilitates intervention when required. Prognosis depends largely on the underlying causes.

Epilepsy

Diagnosis and management of the epilepsies are routinely performed by primary care physicians. In the United States, only 17% of patients with new-onset epilepsy are examined by neurologic specialists, and even fewer patients employ neurologists for their ongoing care. With the changes dictated by the evolving health care system in the United States, the responsibilities for the treatment of patients with epilepsies by primary care physicians will continue to increase. At the same time, there has been an explosion of new information about the diagnosis, evaluation, natural history, and neurobiologic aspects of epilepsy. New medical and surgical treatments are being introduced with a quickening pace. Finally, the concept that certain epilepsies may be progressive and that early identification and aggressive treatment represent one's best chance for establishing control for these patients has gained widespread confirmation from both clinical and animal model studies. The past standard of care is quickly ending. No longer should a patient or a physician accept only partial seizure control. This monograph attempts to lay the basis for improved understanding of epilepsy so that our patients will be seizure free without side effects and will be able to fully participate in our society.