An Approach to Throat Complaints

Risk factors for complications after a foreign body is retained in the esophagus

BACKGROUND

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common problem presenting to the emergency department (ED). The standard treatment, removal by endoscopy, is well established. However, some patients may refuse this invasive procedure due to their fear of an uncomfortable or painful experience. Obtaining hard evidence of potential complications of not having the FB removed by endoscopy would be helpful in convincing patients to have the procedure.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for developing complications after FB ingestion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted over a period of 1 year (April 1, 2006 through March 31, 2007) at a referral medical center. Potential risk factors for developing complications (e.g., age, gender, type of FB, positive finding on radiography) were retrospectively evaluated in patients presenting with esophageal FBs and analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher's exact test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were included. Fish bones were found to be the most common FBs (73.4%). The most commonly affected site was the oropharynx (64.5%). The complication rate was 9.7%. Risk factors for complications after FB ingestion were: 1) time interval over 24 h between FB ingestion and presenting to the ED; 2) a positive radiographic finding; 3) age > 50 years.

CONCLUSION

If a patient presents to the ED with at least one of the three risk factors identified, it is strongly suggested that the patient undergo endoscopy to remove the FB due to a higher risk for developing complications.

Do cervical degenerative diseases associate with foreign body sensation of the pharynx?

Foreign body sensation of the pharynx is a common complaint in otolaryngologic practice. The definite cause of this symptom is seldom precisely diagnosed, leading to chronic pharyngitis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between lump in throat and cervical degenerative disease by their clinical symptoms and the associated image characteristics. All patients with or without the complaint of lump in throat who attended the otolaryngologic clinics of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center from January 2009 to May 2010 were prospectively eligible for this study. A total of 225 patients who met the inclusion criteria were assigned to either the study group (150 patients with symptoms of lump in the throat) or the control group (75 individuals without symptoms). All patients received plain views of the cervical lateral neck. The study group underwent further diagnostic examinations, including esophagography to exclude other diseases. Symptom scores (range, 0-3) and imaging characteristics such as the number (total spurs) and location (C level) of cervical osteophytes, interspace narrowing, spondylolisthesis, and retrolisthesis were compared between the two groups. It was found that the study group had a significantly greater number of total spurs (P < 0.001), and C45, C56, and C67 were the predominant sites, with significant odds ratios of more than 2 at all these levels. Only C67 revealed a difference in interspace narrowing, and only C45 showed a difference in spondylolisthesis between groups. Hence, a high correlation was found between the lump-in-throat sensation and total number of spurs, especially at the levels of C45, C56, and C67. This result implied that cervical osteophytes might be associated with foreign body sensations of the pharynx.

Globus jugularis and dysphagia in patients with hiatus hernia

The aim of the article was to study if there is any relationship between globus sensation in the jugular fossa (GJ), intermittent esophageal dysphagia (IED), and the presence of a hiatus hernia, and if GJ can be relieved after hiatus hernia repair. 167 patients with a hiatus hernia (Group A) and 61 other patients with hiatus hernia and gastroesophageal reflux disease who were surgically treated with Nissen fundoplication (Group B), filled in a symptom questionnaire on GJ and IED. GJ was found in 66% and IED in 68% of patients in group A. In group B, 49% had GJ and 64% IED before surgery. At surgical follow-up 16% (P < 0.005) and 43% (P < 0.05) had GJ and IED, respectively. The combination of GJ and IED was found in 28% of IED patients before operation and in 31% at surgical follow-up. The high frequency of GJ in patients with hiatus hernia and the significant relief of GJ after hiatus hernia repair imply that GJ most likely is a referred sensation from the esophagus. IED and GJ are two parallel phenomena in patients with hiatus hernia, but do not seem to have any causal relationship.

Recurrent abdominal pain due to buckshots in the appendix

Ingestion of foreign bodies is a common paediatric problem, with more than 100,000 cases occurring each year. The majority of these objects are radiopaque. This paper reports a case of elective appendectomy in a patient with unknown ingestion of buckshots affected by recurrent abdominal pain. Plain abdominal films and ultrasound scans showed that the foreign bodies were located in the right lower abdominal quadrant, more specifically in the appendix.

CONCLUSION

Foreign bodies in the appendiceal lumen may cause inflammation, perforation and peritonitis. Surgery seems to be the only effective therapeutic approach to foreign bodies in the appendix.

Needle perforation of the bowel in childhood

Accidental ingestion of foreign bodies occurs frequently in childhood. The majority of them are passed spontaneously, and conservative management generally is recommended for foreign bodies in the stomach and duodenum. However, in some cases, operative intervention should be considered to prevent undesirable complications, such as intestinal perforation. Two cases of intestinal perforation owing to accidental ingestion of a needle are reported.

Foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract

Management of foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract is not standardized among the various specialties and subspecialties of physicians who care for these patients. This article gives a true emergency department approach to the patient with an ingested or inserted gastrointestinal foreign body. Evaluation and management of the foreign body by location are presented. Controversial issues such as Foley catheter removal of esophageal foreign bodies, management of sharp objects in the stomach, and management of body packers and body stuffers are discussed. Examples of foreign bodies encountered by the typical emergency physician are demonstrated.

Foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract

The majority of foreign bodies in the gastrointestinal tract require no medical or surgical intervention for removal. Prior to the era of modern gastrointestinal endoscopy, the management of ingested objects or nontherapeutic objects placed in the rectum required general anesthesia and was relegated to the general surgeon or otolaryngologist. With the advancement of therapeutic endoscopy, fewer affected individuals require surgical intervention. The physician involved with the initial evaluation of these patients must have a working knowledge of foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract to facilitate appropriate and timely management and referral.

Ingested foreign bodies: patient-guided localization is a useful clinical tool

We prospectively studied the latest 60 patients who presented to the ENT Departments of St Mary's and St George's Hospitals with ingested foreign bodies. Localization of the foreign body by the patient was compared to the actual site of the foreign body at removal and graded accordingly. Localization was better the higher the object. When compared with objects above the cricopharyngeus muscle items impacted below this level were poorly localized (P < 0.0001) and lateralized (P < 0.0001). This suggests that for a patient who is able to lateralize a presumptive foreign body within the cervical region, then that object is likely to be above cricopharyngeus and on the side indicated. Further, it is likely to be visible on indirect laryngoscopy and amenable to removal in the casualty department. We hypothesize that the pharyngeal innervation by the vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves provides better sensation than in the oesophagus which is innervated less densely by the vagus and cervical sympathetic nerves.