Update on Immunofluorescent Testing in Bullous Diseases and Lupus Erythematosus

Oral mucosal diseases: Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Subepithelial vesiculobullous conditions are chronic autoimmune disorders that arise from reactions directed against components of the hemidesmosomes or basement membrane zones (BMZ) of stratified squamous epithelium to which the term immune-mediated subepithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has been given. Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is the most common, but variants do exist. Non-immune disorders that involve these epithelial components typically have a genetic basis--the main example being epidermolysis bullosa. All subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders present as blisters and erosions, and diagnosis must be confirmed by biopsy examination with immunostaining, sometimes supplemented by other investigations. No single treatment reliably controls all subepithelial vesiculobullous disorders; the immunological differences within IMSEBD may account for differences in responses to treatment. Currently, as well as improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory treatment is used to control the oral lesions of MMP, but it is not known if its specific subsets reliably respond to different agents.

Number III Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorder. It is now quite evident that a number of sub-epithelial vesiculobullous disorders may produce similar clinical pictures, and also that a range of variants of MMP exist, with antibodies directed against various hemidesmosomal components or components of the epithelial basement membrane. The term immune-mediated sub-epithelial blistering diseases (IMSEBD) has therefore been used. Immunological differences may account for the significant differences in their clinical presentation and responses to therapy, but unfortunately data on this are few. The diagnosis and management of IMSEBD on clinical grounds alone is impossible and a full history, general, and oral examination, and biopsy with immunostaining are now invariably required, sometimes supplemented with other investigations. No single treatment regimen reliably controls all these disorders, and it is not known if the specific subsets of MMP will respond to different drugs. Currently, apart from improving oral hygiene, immunomodulatory-especially immunosuppressive-therapy is typically used to control oral lesions. The present paper reviews pemphigoid, describing the present understanding of this fascinating clinical phenotype, summarising the increasing number of subsets with sometimes-different natural histories and immunological features, and outlining current clinical practice.

Mucous membrane pemphigoid

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a chronic, subepithelial autoimmune disease, which predominantly involves mucosal surfaces and results in mucosal blistering, ulceration, and subsequent scarring. This article discusses the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of MMP, with mention of related subepithelial bullous dermatoses.

Modification to the approach of the diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid: A case report and literature review

Mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) is a subepithelial blistering disease predominantly involving the mucosal surfaces. Distinct subgroups of MMP have recently been identified by using advanced immunopathologic and immunochemical techniques and are described in the literature on the basis of their clinical features and antigenic specificities. Antiepiligrin MMP has been described as an immunochemically distinct entity. Evidence of an existing relationship between malignancy and antiepiligrin MMP has been well documented in the medical literature. This case report illustrates a case of antiepiligrin MMP in a patient with an advanced cancer of the bladder.

Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of oral pemphigoid: a selective review of the literature

Pemphigoid is a group of bullous diseases that have a diversified morphologic presentation and affect the skin, oral mucosa, and other mucosal membranes, alone or in combination. In the literature, the condition has been subclassified into bullous pemphigoid and cicatricial pemphigoid (mucous membrane pemphigoid) on the basis of the primary organ of involvement. In addition to the clinical presentation and a subepithelial vesicle or bullae on routine histologic analysis, the diagnosis is based on direct and indirect immunofluorescence studies. Recent investigations indicate that different clinical groups of patients with pemphigoid produce autoantibodies to different molecules within the basement membrane zone. Based on these recent observations and a review of the literature, a viewpoint is presented that not all patients with cicatricial pemphigoid should be grouped together. Rather, they should be classified into subgroups-ocular, oral, etc-on the basis of the clinical phenotype and long-term follow-up. Such a division will facilitate the provision of appropriate and relevant treatment plans; if the clinical course changes, the diagnosis can be adjusted. This strategy will prevent patients with disease limited to the oral cavity from receiving systemic drugs or agents that may be more harmful than beneficial.

When to request immunofluorescence: practical hints

This review highlights important considerations in obtaining good skin biopsy specimens to optimize results of direct immunofluorescence (IF) studies and also summarizes the various patterns of cutaneous IF deposition and their associated diagnoses. IF findings of immunobullous diseases, lupus erythematosus, vasculitis, lichen planus, and erythema multiforme are included. The uses of indirect IF studies are also reviewed including newer modifications that are valuable in helping to diagnose epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and paraneoplastic pemphigus.

Reactivity of autoantibodies from patients with defined subepidermal bullous diseases against 1 mol/L salt-split skin. Specificity, sensitivity, and practical considerations

BACKGROUND

Circulating IgG anti-basement membrane autoantibodies from patients with subepidermal bullous diseases can be categorized on the basis of their pattern of reactivity against 1 mol/L sodium chloride (NaCl)-split skin.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to define by immunochemical techniques the specific antigen(s) targeted by IgG autoantibodies from a group of patients with subepidermal blistering diseases and then (1) prospectively determine which side(s) of 1 mol/L NaCl-split skin is (are) bound by these patients' autoantibodies, (2) compare the sensitivity of intact and 1 mol/L NaCl-split skin for the detection of these autoantibodies; and (3) devise a practical method to distinguish patients with antiepiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid from those with other subepidermal blistering diseases.

METHODS

Investigative techniques included direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy, immunoprecipitation studies, and immunoblotting.

RESULTS

These studies identified 14 patients whose sera immunoprecipitate bullous pemphigoid antigens 1, 2, or both. These patients' circulating IgG anti-basement membrane autoantibodies bind the epidermal (n = 11), epidermal and dermal (n = 2), or dermal (n = 1) sides of 1 mol/L NaCl-split skin by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy. In contrast, IgG from all patients with autoantibodies directed against type VII collagen (n = 5) or epiligrin (n = 6) bind only the dermal side of 1 mol/L NaCl-split skin. In all but one patient in this series, 1 mol/L NaCl-split skin proved to be a more sensitive test substrate than intact human skin for detection of circulating IgG anti-basement membrane autoantibodies. Patients with antiepiligrin cicatricial pemphigoid were distinguished from other patients in that their circulating autoantibodies bound epidermal basement membrane in the skin of primates but not small mammals.

CONCLUSION

NaCl-split skin (1 mol/L) of various species is a sensitive and practical indirect immunofluorescence microscopy test substrate for the evaluation of patients with IgG anti-basement membrane autoantibodies and evaluation of subepidermal bullous diseases.