Prospective randomized comparison of antiarrhythmic therapy versus first-line radiofrequency ablation in patients with atrial flutter

Case report: Cardiac arrest after radiofrequency ablation in a 76-year-old male

RATIONALE

Previous studies have found that the main treatment of sinus arrest is pacemaker treatment. It is rare to have 12 s of sinus arrest after radiofrequency ablation, and whether a permanent pacemaker is implanted immediately in this case is not described in the guidelines.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 76-year-old male patient with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) developed sinus arrest lasting 12 s in the early morning of the fourth day after using radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with AF and sinus arrest.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, intravenous injection of atropine 1 mg, and intravenous infusion of isoproterenol 1mg and immediately recovered consciousness thereafter. Approximately, 1.5 h later, the patient underwent surgery to install a temporary pacemaker in the right femoral vein.

OUTCOMES

The patient had repeated episodes of sinus arrest after the implantation of a temporary pacemaker. After 3 weeks, the patient stabilized and was discharged. The patient was followed up for 1 year and did not experience any recurrence of sinus arrest or AF.

LESSONS

We consider the potential for postoperative myocardial edema, injury to the sinoatrial node during the procedure, propafenone poisoning, and autonomic dysfunction as contributors to the occurrence of sinus arrest after radiofrequency ablation. When sinus arrest occurs after radiofrequency ablation, we can choose the appropriate treatment according to the patient's condition.

[Isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter : Clinical course after isthmus ablation]

Ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) to create bidirectional isthmus blockade is the most effective way to achieve rhythm control in typical atrial flutter. Compared with drug therapy, ablation reduces cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, stroke risk, and the risk of cardiac decompensation. Concomitant arrhythmia of atrial flutter is atrial fibrillation (AF); therefore the duration of oral anticoagulation should be adapted according to the risk of stroke and bleeding. A combined procedure of CTI ablation and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with typical atrial flutter but without evidence of AF should be evaluated individually especially in patients aged > 54 years depending on (cardiac) comorbidities. The comprehensive diagnostic view should keep in mind not only arrhythmias but also possibly underlying coronary artery disease.

Half-Normal Saline vs Normal Saline for Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Ablation

Background

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation requires permanent bidirectional block to prevent recurrence of typical atrial flutter (AFL). Catheter irrigation with half-normal saline (HNS) produces larger and deeper lesions in experimental models compared with normal saline (NS). This study was performed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of HNS vs NS irrigation for typical AFL ablation.

Methods

Sixty patients undergoing catheter ablation of typical AFL were randomized 1:1 to NS or HNS irrigation. Endpoints included time to CTI block, acute reconnection, incidence of steam pops, and recurrence of AFL during follow-up.

Results

Baseline characteristics were comparable between both arms. The mean age of the patients was 68.5 ± 8.2 years, 20% were female, and 32% had atrial fibrillation before being enrolled. Bidirectional CTI block was obtained in all patients with no difference in time to CTI block between groups (6.4 ± 4.4 minutes vs 7.6 ± 4.5 minutes, respectively; P = 0.15). There was a trend to less acute reconnection in the HNS group compared with NS (13.3% vs 26.6%; P = 0.46). Steam pops occurred in 4 patients using HNS vs none in the NS group, but no major complications were observed. During the follow-up, rate of AFL recurrence was similar between groups (6.7% with HNS vs 10% with NS; P = 0.5). There was no difference in time to recurrence (7.6 ± 6.9 vs 4.9 ± 4.5 months; P = 0.6).

Conclusions

In this small pilot randomized controlled trial, there was no significant difference between HNS and NS for CTI ablation; however, HNS may increase the incidence of steam pops.

Contact Force-Guided versus Contact Force-Blinded Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus Ablation for Atrial Flutter: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact force (CF) is a novel approach developed to increase the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation. However, the value of CF-sensing technology for atrial flutter (AFL) cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) is inconclusive. To generate a comprehensive assessment of optimal extant data on CF for AFL, we synthesized randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies from Web of Science, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane until 29 November 2022, using the odds ratio (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Two RCTs and three observational studies with a total of 376 patients were included in our analysis. CF-guided ablation was associated with (A) a higher rate of AFL recurrence (OR: 2.26 with 95% CI [1.05, 4.87]) and total CF (MD: 2.71 with 95% CI [1.28, 4.13]); (B) no effect on total procedure duration (MD: -2.88 with 95% CI [-7.48, 1.72]), fluoroscopy duration (MD: -0.96 with 95% CI [-2.24, 0.31]), and bidirectional isthmus block (BDIB) (OR: 1.50 with 95% CI [0.72, 3.11]); and (C) decreased radiofrequency (RF) duration (MD: -1.40 with 95% CI [-2.39, -0.41]). We conclude that although CF-guided CTIA was associated with increased AFL recurrence and total CF and reduced RF duration, it did not affect total procedure duration, fluoroscopy duration, or BDIB. Thus, CF-guided CTIA may not be the optimal intervention for AFL. These findings indicate the need for (A) providers to balance the benefits and risks of CF when utilizing precision medicine to develop treatment plans for individuals with AFL and (B) clinical trials investigating CF-guided catheter ablation for AFL to provide definitive evidence of optimal CF-sensing technology.

Right atrial collision time (RACT): A novel marker of propensity for typical atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION

The risk of typical atrial flutter (AFL) is increased proportionately to right atrial (RA) size or right atrial scarring that results in reduced conduction velocity. These characteristics result in propagation of a flutter wave by ensuring the macro re-entrant wave front does not meet its refractory tail. The time taken to traverse the circuit would take account of both of these characteristics and may provide a novel marker of propensity to develop AFL. Our goal was to investigate right atrial collision time (RACT) as a marker of existing typical AFL.

METHODS

This single-centre, prospective study recruited consecutive typical AFL ablation patients that were in sinus rhythm. Controls were consecutive electrophysiology study patients >18 years of age. While pacing the coronary sinus (CS) ostium at 600 ms, a local activation time map was created to locate the latest collision point on the anterolateral right atrial wall. This RACT is a measure of conduction velocity and distance from CS to a collision point on the lateral right atrial wall.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight patients were included in the analysis, 41 with atrial flutter and 57 controls. Patients with atrial flutter were older, 64.7 ± 9.7 versus 52.4 ± 16.8 years (<.001), and more often male (34/41 vs. 31/57 [.003]). The AFL group mean RACT (132.6 ± 17.3 ms) was significantly longer than that of controls (99.1 ± 11.6 ms) (p < .001). A RACT cut-off of 115.5 ms had a sensitivity and specificity of 92.7% and 93.0%, respectively for diagnosis of atrial flutter. A ROC curve indicated an AUC of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.93-1.0, p < .01).

CONCLUSION

RACT is a novel and promising marker of propensity for typical AFL. This data will inform larger prospective studies.

Long-term results of two-stage ablation approach in coexistent atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter: prospective randomized study

Background One of the most arrhythmias associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) is typical atrial flutter (AFL). The main methods of surgical treatment of these arrhythmias is catheter ablation. The problem of catheter ablation strategy for these coexistentarrhythmias is not solved. Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm in a two-stage approach to the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation associated with typical atrial flutter. Methods: The study included 34 patients aged 41-82 years with AF and coexistent typical AFL. Female 11 (32,35%), male 23 (67,35%). Randomization 1:1. Group 1 (n=17) has been performed radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) with radiofrequency catheter isolation of the PV. Group 2 (n=17) has been performed only RFA of CTI. AF and AFL recurrences rate has been evaluated in both groups. Follow-up period 12 months. Results: Procedure duration and fluoroscopy time were less in group 2 that those in group 1. Extended intervention in group 1 was accompanied with complications in two cases. There were no significant differences in AF recurrence rate in both groups (p=0,43183). AFL recurrences has not been found in both groups. Conclusion: One stage ablation approach in AF patients with coexistent AFLassociated with increaseprocedure duration and fluoroscopy time. The frequency of AF recurrence in patients who underwent extended intervention (catheter isolation of the PV and RFA CTI) and in patients who underwent only the elimination of typical atrial flutter, was not statistically significantly different (p = 0.43183). In the presence of AF and typical atrial flutter, a two-stage approach to interventional treatment should be regarded as appropriate.

Lesion size index-guided cavotricuspid isthmus linear ablation

BACKGROUND

The lesion size index (LSI) predicts radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion size and is an established parameter for pulmonary vein isolation. However, the effectiveness and safety of LSI for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) linear ablation remain unclear.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 50 of patients (67 ± 10 years, 68% male) who underwent de novo CTI linear ablation between July 2020 and December 2020. The LSI target was set at 5.0 and 4.0 for the anterior ^2/3 and posterior ^1/3 segments, respectively. Acute procedural parameters of ablation were evaluated.

RESULTS

Acute bidirectional CTI block was achieved in all patients with an RF application time of 4.0 min (3.1-5.0 min), RF application number of 15 ± 7, and length of CTI of 36.9 ± 9.3 mm. First-pass bidirectional conduction block of the CTI was achieved in 39/50 (78%) patients. No major complications were observed. The contact force (CF) per application was significantly lower in the gap tag group than in the non-gap tag group (7 g [7-8 g] vs. 10 g [7-12 g], P = 0.0284).

CONCLUSIONS

LSI-guided CTI linear ablation is an effective and safe treatment approach. CF affects gap formation, even when the target LSI is the same.

Effect of contact vector direction on achieving cavotricuspid isthmus block

Cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation is an important treatment strategy for CTI-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The location of the catheter contact area is confirmed by the contact vector direction (CVD) through three-dimensional mapping during the procedure. However, the relationship between CVD during radiofrequency ablation and its efficacy in achieving CTI block has not been clarified. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CVD and efficacy in achieving CTI block. CVDs during radiofrequency ablation were divided into proximal vectors against the distal tip (P-vector) and other vectors (normal-vector). In 39 patients who underwent CTI linear ablation, the CTIs were divided into two segments: the tricuspid valve area (anterior) and inferior vena cava area (posterior). The frequency of the residual conduction gap was compared between segments in which the P- and normal-vectors were observed. P-vectors were observed in 13 of the 78 segments. The median ablation index was not significantly different between segments in which the P-vector and normal-vector were observed (398.2 [384.2-402.2] vs. 393.3 [378.3-400.1], p = 0.15). However, residual conduction gaps were significantly more frequently observed in the segment in which the P-vector was observed than those in which only the normal-vector was observed (6/13, 46.2% vs. 3/65, 4.6%; p < 0.01). During a 6-month follow-up, two patients required a second session of ablation due to AFL recurrence. A residual conduction gap was observed in one patient at the site where the P-vector was observed in the first session. Avoiding the P-vector might be an important factor in improving CTI block and reducing AFL recurrence.

Catheter ablation and thoracoscopic ablation in long persistent atrial fibrillation with large left atrium

Background

Pulmonary vein antrum isolation (PVAI) is the cornerstone of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but the clinical outcomes of PVAI are unsatisfactory in patients with persistent AF and a large left atrium (LA).

Objectives

We investigated the clinical outcomes following radiofrequency ablation (RFCA), cryoballoon ablation (CBA), and thoracoscopic maze in patients with persistent AF and a large LA.

Methods

We included patients with consecutive persistent AF who had a large LA (LA diameter >50 mm) and underwent RFCA, CBA, or thoracoscopic maze surgery. In the RFCA group, additional linear ablation was performed at the physician’s discretion. The endpoint was 12 months without recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia, including AF, atrial flutter, and atrial tachycardia, following a 90-day blanking period.

Results

We recruited 89 persistent AF patients with a large LA who underwent RFCA (n = 32), CBA (n = 38), or the thoracoscopic maze procedure (n = 19). During the 12-month follow-up, 48 (53.9%) cases of AF recurrence were observed. There was no prognostic difference between groups (50.0% in RFCA vs. 52.6% in CBA vs. 63.2% in thoracoscopic maze, all P > 0.05). Early recurrence during the blanking period was a significant predictor of late recurrence for RFCA and CBA, but not for the thoracoscopic maze.

Conclusion

In persistent AF patients with a large LA, we did not find a prognostic difference RFCA, CBA, or a thoracoscopic maze procedure in recurrence of atrial arrhythmia. Early recurrence predicted late recurrence in catheter ablation, but not in thoracoscopic maze.

The History of Atrial Flutter Electrophysiology, from Entrainment to Ablation: A 100-Year Experience in the Precision Electrocardiology

Atrial flutter (AFL) is a regular supraventricular reentrant tachycardia generating a continuous fluttering of the baseline electrocardiography (ECG) at a rate of 250 to 300 beats per minute. AFL is classified based on the involvement of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus in the circuit. The "isthmic" (or type 1) AFL develops entirely in the right atrium; this circuit is commonly activated in a counter-clockwise direction, generating the common sawtooth ECG morphology in the inferior leads (slow descendent-fast ascendent). AFL can be nonisthmus dependent (type 2), often presenting with faster atrial rate and most commonly a left atrial location.

Pathophysiology of Atypical Atrial Flutters

Atypical atrial flutters are complex supraventricular arrhythmias that share different pathophysiological aspects in common. In most cases, the arrhythmogenic substrate is essentially embodied by slow-conducting areas eliciting re-entrant circuits. Although atrial scarring seems to promote slow conduction, these arrhythmias may occur even in the absence of structural heart disease. To set out the ablation strategy in this setting, three-dimensional mapping systems have proved invaluable over the last decades, helping the cardiac electrophysiologist understand the electrophysiological complexity of these circuits and easily identify critical areas amenable to effective catheter ablation.

Mapping and Ablation of Atypical Atrial Flutters

Atypical atrial flutters are complex, hard-to-manage atrial arrhythmias. Catheter ablation has progressively emerged as a successful treatment option with a remarkable role played by irrigated-tip catheters and 3D electroanatomic mapping systems. However, despite the improvement of these technologies, the ablation results may be still suboptimal due to the progressive atrial substrate modification occurring in diseased hearts. Hence, a patient-tailored approach is required to improve the long-term success rate in this scenario, aiming at achieving specific procedure end points and detecting any potential arrhythmogenic substrate in each patient.

Local impedance-guided ablation and ultra-high density mapping versus conventional or contact force-guided ablation with mapping for treatment of cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter

INTRODUCTION

- Local impedance (LI) guided ablation as a method of judging lesion effectiveness for cavotricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter (CTI-AFL), and ultra-high density (UHD) mapping when breakthrough occurred across an ablation line has not previously been assessed.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study evaluated patients undergoing CTI-AFL ablation using conventional, contact force (CF) and LI guided strategies. Ablation metrics were collected, and in the LI cohort, the use of UHD mapping for breakthrough evaluated.

RESULTS

30 patients were included, 10 per group. Mean total ablation time was significantly shorter with LI (3.2 ± 1.3min) vs conventional (5.6 ± 2.7min) and CF (5.7 ± 2.0min, p = 0.0042). Time from start of ablation to CTI block was numerically shorter with LI (14.2 ± 8.0min) vs conventional and CF (19.7 ± 14.1 and 22.5 ± 19.1min, p = 0.4408). Mean lesion duration was significantly shorter with LI, but there were no differences in the number of lesions required to achieve block, procedural success, complication rates or recurrence. 15/30 patients did not achieve block following first-pass ablation. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough in the five LI patients, including epicardial-endocardial breakthrough (EEB).

CONCLUSION

- The use of LI during ablation for real-time lesion assessment was as efficacious as the conventional and CF methods. UHD mapping rapidly identified breakthrough, including EEB.

Procedural Feasibility and Long-Term Efficacy of Catheter Ablation of Atypical Atrial Flutters in a Wide Spectrum of Heart Diseases: An Updated Clinical Overview

Atypical atrial flutters (AAFL) are difficult-to-manage atrial arrhythmias, yet potentially amenable to effective radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA). However, data on CA feasibility are only sparingly reported in the literature in different clinical settings, such as AAFL related to surgical correction of congenital heart disease. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of the clinical settings in which AAFL may occur to help the cardiac electrophysiologist in the prediction of the tachycardia circuit location before CA. Moreover, the role and proper implementation of cutting-edge technologies in this setting were investigated as well as which procedural and clinical factors are associated with long-term failure to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) to find out which patients may, or may not, benefit from this procedure. Not only different surgical and non-surgical scenarios are associated with peculiar anatomical location of AAFL, but we also found that CA of AAFL is generally feasible. The success rate may be as low as 50% in surgically corrected congenital heart disease (CHD) patients but up to about 90% on average after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) or in patients without structural heart disease. Over the years, the progressive implementation of three-dimensional mapping systems and high-density mapping tools has also proved helpful for ablation of these macro-reentrant circuits. However, the long-term maintenance of SR may still be suboptimal due to the progressive electroanatomic atrial remodeling occurring after cardiac surgery or other interventional procedures, thus limiting the likelihood of successful ablation in specific clinical settings.

Ablation index-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation with contiguous lesions using fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping in atrial flutter

PURPOSE

The feasibility and safety of cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation with contiguous lesions using ablation index (AI) under the guidance of fluoroscopy integrated 3D mapping (CARTO UNIVU/CU) in typical atrial flutter (AFL) remains uncertain. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of AI-guided CTI ablation with contiguous lesions in patients with AFL.

METHODS

In this single-center, prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, observational study, procedural outcomes were determined in 151 patients undergoing AI-guided CTI ablation (AI group) with a target AI value of 450 and an interlesion distance of ≤ 4 mm under CU guidance. These outcomes were compared with those of 30 patients undergoing non-AI-guided ablation (non-AI group).

RESULTS

Among 151 patients, first-pass conduction block was achieved in 120 (80%) patients in the AI group (67% in the non-AI group, P = 0.152) with a shorter fluoroscopy time of 0.2 ± 0.4 min (1.7 ± 2.0 min in the non-AI group, P < 0.001). Conduction gaps were located at the atrial aspects near the inferior vena cava in 24 of 31 (78%) patients without first-pass conduction block. The AI group received 11 ± 5 (12 ± 4 in the non-AI group, P = 0.098) radiofrequency (RF) applications, and the RF time was 4.2 ± 2.4 (5.1 ± 2.5 min in the non-AI group, P = 0.011). Despite the occurrence of steam pop in 3 (2%) patients, none of them developed cardiac tamponade. No patients had recurrence within 6 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-guided CTI ablation in combination with CU was feasible and effective in reducing radiation exposure in patients with AFL.

Patient-activated Anti-tachycardia pacing in adult congenital heart disease

Introduction

In adults with congenital heart disease, intra‐atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is a common arrhythmia that causes significant morbidity and mortality. One treatment option for IART is antitachycardia pacing. Atrial antitachycardia pacing algorithms deliver therapy for IART with ≥2:1 conduction, but most algorithms will not recognize IART with 1:1 conduction. Temporary Patient Activated Rx (TPARx) is Medtronic software that can be installed in antitachycardia pacemakers allowing patients to deliver therapies on demand for IART with 1:1 conduction.

Methods

Retrospective chart review at a single institution of all patients who had TPARx installed into their pacemaker.

Results

Four adults with single ventricle congenital heart disease and IART underwent Fontan conversion, arrhythmia surgery, and placement of an epicardial dual‐chamber antitachycardia pacemaker. They had recurrent IART with a long cycle length and 1:1 conduction that failed to trigger antitachycardia pacing therapies. TPARx software was programmed into their pacemakers to allow recognition and treatment of IART with 1:1 conduction. Mean follow‐up duration after TPARx programming was 4.9 years. Each patient received at least one successful antitachycardia pacing therapy via TPARx – range 0.4–26 treated IART episodes per year. There were no atrial or ventricular arrhythmias induced with antitachycardia pacing. Two patients were able to discontinue anticoagulation after TPARx installation.

Conclusion

This series demonstrates the use of TPARx software as part of a long‐term IART management strategy in select patients with IART who have failed more conventional therapies.

Comparison between the novel diamond temp and the classical 8-mm tip ablation catheters in the setting of typical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is widely accepted as a first-line therapy for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL). The novel DiamondTemp (DT) catheter with temperature feedback during RF ablation has been released recently on the market. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of DiamondTemp (DT) technology on ablation efficiency during AFL.

METHODS

In this single-center study, 30 consecutive patients with typical AFL indicated to ablation of CTI were included. The first 15 patients underwent CTI ablation using 8-mm tip catheter, and the following 15 patients underwent temperature-controlled RF ablation using DT catheter. The endpoints were number and mean total duration of RF applications, mean temperature reached in the setting of CTI, procedural times, and fluoroscopy times.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups concerning baseline characteristics. Mean duration of the each application (71.5 s ± 30.6 vs 12.4 s ± 13.2, p value < 0.001), mean total duration of RF applications (517,73 s ± 377,96 vs 112,8 s ± 43,58; p value < 0.001), procedural times (51.6 min ± 24.2 vs 38.6 ± 8.2; p = 0.03), and fluoroscopy times (16.2 min ± 10.2 vs 8 min ± 4.24; p = 0.005) were longer in the 8-mm ablation catheter group. Mean temperature measurements (51.9 °C ± 3.59 vs 56.7 °C ± 3.34, p value < 0.003) were as well lower in the 8-mm ablation catheter group.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of CTI-dependent AFL by means of DT resulted in a significant reduction of total and single application RF delivery time, procedure, and fluoroscopy times.

Rates of atrial flutter occurrence and cavotricuspid isthmus reconduction after prophylactic isthmus ablation performed during atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical study, review, and comparison with previous findings

PURPOSE

Based on the high rate of coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL), prophylactic cavotricuspid isthmus ablation (CTIA) adjunctive to AF ablation has recently been attempted in patients with AF and without AFL. The present study aimed to determine the rates of AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction after performing CTI ablation adjunctive to AF ablation.

METHODS

We analyzed the data of 3833 consecutive patients with AF, who underwent prophylactic CTIA with AF ablation between 2009 and 2020.

RESULTS

In all patients, CTIA and AF ablations were successful. Clinical AFL occurred in seven patients (0.18%, 7/3,833), and the observed rate was lower than those reported for cases of AF ablation without CTIA and for those of CTIA for pure AFL. A second ablation was needed in 745 patients at a median of 253 days (25 and 75 percentiles, 116 and 775 days) after the first ablation. In 12.1% (90/745) of the patients, CTI reconduction was observed. The reconduction rate was lower than that previously reported for CTIA for pure AFL.

CONCLUSIONS

The present retrospective study found acceptably low rates of clinical AFL occurrence and CTI reconduction following prophylactic CTIA performed with AF ablation, which was supported by the findings obtained after performing a comparison of the rates with those of other ablations (AF ablation only and CTIA for pure AFL). Considering the high correlation between AF and AFL, the present study provided information regarding the efficacy of adjunctive CTIA.

Prediction of Recurrent Atrial Tachyarrhythmia After Receiving Atrial Flutter Ablation in Patients With Prior Cardiac Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease

Background: Surgical scars cause an intra-atrial conduction delay and anatomical obstacles that facilitate the perpetuation of atrial flutter (AFL). This study aimed to investigate the outcome and predictor of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia after catheter ablation in patients with prior cardiac surgery for valvular heart disease (VHD) who presented with AFL.

Methods: Seventy-two patients with prior cardiac surgery for VHD who underwent AFL ablation were included. The patients were categorized into a typical AFL group (n = 45) and an atypical AFL group (n = 27). The endpoint was the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia during follow-up. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictor of recurrence.

Results: No significant difference was found in the recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia between the two groups. Patients with concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) had a higher recurrence of typical AFL compared with those without AF (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.012). In subgroup analysis, typical AFL patients with concomitant AF had a higher incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia than those without it (53 vs. 14%, P = 0.006). Regarding patients without AF, the typical AFL group had a lower recurrence rate of atrial tachyarrhythmia than the atypical AFL group (14 vs. 40%, P = 0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that chronic kidney disease (CKD) and left atrial diameter (LAD) were independent predictors of recurrence.

Conclusions: In our study cohort, concomitant AF was associated with recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia. CKD and LAD independently predicted recurrence after AFL ablation in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery for VHD.

Minielectrode catheter technology for near zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided ablation of typical atrial flutter

Background

MicroFidelity catheter technology may facilitate voltage-guided ablation by high-resolution electroanatomic mapping (HR-EAM) and precisely targeted energy application.

Objective

To evaluate the performance of minielectrode (ME) technology for zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation.

Methods

Eighty-two patients underwent near zero-fluoroscopy substrate-guided CTI ablation using a nonirrigated large-tip catheter with 3 MEs. The CTI was subdivided into 15 electroanatomic segments. Bipolar voltage maps were compared with ME signals. The outcome was compared with a historic cohort of 92 patients who underwent linear ablation.

Results

Compared with linear ablation, the substrate-guided approach was associated with an almost halved ablation duration (336 ± 228 vs 649 ± 409 seconds, P < .001), halved radiofrequency energy applied (14.2 ± 10.6 vs 28.6 ± 19.6 kJ, P < .001), and shorter procedure duration (60.8 ± 33.8 vs 76.3 ± 40.9 minutes, P = .008) limiting the extent of energy delivery to 22.7% of the CTI area. HR-EAM visualized 2.03 ± 0.88 conductive pathways with a diameter of 5.35 ± 1.98 mm. A higher number of ME-detected bundles and a larger channel diameter correlated with increased ablation requirements. In 97.6% of the voltage-guided and 88.0% of the linear procedures, fluoroscopy was not used.

Conclusion

HR-EAM-based substrate-guided CTI ablation may improve procedural outcome compared with the linear approach. Enhanced identification of discrete conductive pathways correlates with ablation efficacy. The electroanatomic subdivision of the CTI into 15 segments was feasible and may improve the understanding and comparability of anatomic variants and ablation results. Independent of the ablation strategy, modern EAM technology enables safe zero-fluoroscopy procedures in the majority of cases.

Noninvasive localization of cardiac arrhythmias using electromechanical wave imaging

Cardiac arrhythmias are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is the current noninvasive clinical tool used to diagnose and localize cardiac arrhythmias. However, it has limited accuracy and is subject to operator bias. Here, we present electromechanical wave imaging (EWI), a high-frame rate ultrasound technique that can noninvasively map with high accuracy the electromechanical activation of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in adult patients. This study evaluates the accuracy of EWI for localization of various arrhythmias in all four chambers of the heart before catheter ablation. Fifty-five patients with an accessory pathway (AP) with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), atrial tachycardia (AT), or atrial flutter (AFL) underwent transthoracic EWI and 12-lead ECG. Three-dimensional (3D) rendered EWI isochrones and 12-lead ECG predictions by six electrophysiologists were applied to a standardized segmented cardiac model and subsequently compared to the region of successful ablation on 3D electroanatomical maps generated by invasive catheter mapping. There was significant interobserver variability among 12-lead ECG reads by expert electrophysiologists. EWI correctly predicted 96% of arrhythmia locations as compared with 71% for 12-lead ECG analyses [unadjusted for arrhythmia type: odds ratio (OR), 11.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.2 to 63.2; P = 0.004; adjusted for arrhythmia type: OR, 12.1; 95% CI, 2.3 to 63.2; P = 0.003]. This double-blinded clinical study demonstrates that EWI can localize atrial and ventricular arrhythmias including WPW, PVC, AT, and AFL. EWI when used with ECG may allow for improved treatment for patients with arrhythmias.

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Supraventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Pulmonary Hypertension: Feasibility and Long-Term Outcome

Background

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) occurs commonly and is strongly correlated with clinical deterioration in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and long-term outcome of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in PH patients with SVT.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive PH patients with SVT who were scheduled to undergo electrophysiological study and RFCA between September 2010 and July 2019 were included. The acute results and long-term success of RFCA were assessed after the procedure.

Results

In total, 71 PH patients with 76 episodes of SVT were analyzed. Cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent atrial flutter (n = 33, 43.5%) was the most common SVT type, followed by atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (n = 16, 21.1%). Of the 71 patients, 60 (84.5%) underwent successful electrophysiological study and were subsequently treated by RFCA. Among them, acute sinus rhythm was restored in 54 (90.0%) patients, and procedure-related complications were observed in 4 (6.7%) patients. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that cavotricuspid isthmus-independent atrial flutter [odds ratio (OR) 25.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.45–180.98, p = 0.001] and wider pulmonary artery diameter (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.03–1.38; p = 0.016) were associated with RFCA failure. During a median follow-up of 36 (range, 3–108) months, 7 patients with atrial flutter experienced recurrence, yielding a 78.3% 3-year success rate for RFCA treatment.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that RFCA of SVT in PH patients is feasible and has a good long-term success rate. Cavotricuspid isthmus-independent atrial flutter and a wider PAD could increase the risk for ablation failure.

Ablation Therapy as Management of Typical Atrial Flutter in the Early Period After Cardiac Surgery

Introduction

Available data on management of atrial flutter in the early postoperative setting after cardiac surgery are scarce. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy (profile) of flutter ablation in the early postoperative phase (30 days after cardiac surgery) in a cohort of 47 consecutive patients.

Methods

Between 2007 and 2016, 47 patients who underwent ablation for postoperative typical atrial flutter were retrospectively identified and analyzed. Follow-up data were acquired from patients’ records in case of rehospitalization and via follow-up calls.

Results

The median age of patients was 69 years, 89% male and with a median LV-EF of 55%. CAD was present in 80.8% of patients. The predominant conduction of atrial flutter was 2:1 (76.6%); 85.1% of patients had either undergone CABG, SAVR, or a combination of these two. Acute procedural success could be achieved in 100% of patients with one vascular pseudoaneurysm that was managed conservatively. No other complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 5.7 years, follow-up information regarding heart rhythm was available in 87.2% of patients. One patient (2.1%) had undergone repeat ablation for typical flutter. Two patients (4.2%) had developed atrial fibrillation, while 87.2% of patients were in sinus rhythm.

Conclusions

In this small cohort, early postoperative ablation of typical flutter was associated with a favorable short- and long-term safety and efficacy profile and can be considered part of heart rhythm management options in this setting.

A simplified differential pacing technique for the evaluation of bidirectional cavo-tricuspid isthmus block during ablation of typical atrial flutter

PURPOSE

Bidirectional block of the cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is an established endpoint of CTI-dependent atrial flutter (AFl) ablation. Differential pacing has been used to evaluate the CTI block. The purpose of this study is to describe a modified differential pacing technique to evaluate the CTI block.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients underwent radiofrequency (RF) ablation of CTI-dependent AFl. The acute endpoints were non-inducibility of the AFl, and verification of the bidirectional CTI block by our methodology. Pacing was performed in the CS with an ablation catheter positioned immediately lateral to the CTI ablation line, and then 1-2 cm more laterally. The stimulus-to-ablation catheter atrial electrogram intervals were measured at these sites (Stim_CS-Abl₁ and Stim_CS-Abl₂, respectively). Pacing with the ablation catheter also was performed at these 2 sites, and the stimulus-to-CS electrogram intervals (Stim_ABL1-CS and Stim_ABL2-CS) were measured. The criteria for the bidirectional block were Stim_CS-Abl₁ > Stim_CS-Abl₂, and Stim_ABL1-CS > Stim_ABL2-CS. Clinical efficacy was defined as freedom from recurrent AFl during follow-up.

RESULTS

Following 12.2 ± 3.7 min of RF delivery across the CTI, intervals were Stim_CS-Abl₁ = 181.2 ± 22.7 ms and Stim_ABL1-CS = 181.0 ± 23.6 ms, and Stim_CS-Abl₂ = 152.2 ± 26.5 ms and Stim_ABL2-CS = 151.2 ± 22.7 (P < 0.001). Atrial flutter was rendered not inducible in all patients, and no procedural complications were encountered. During the next 15.9 ± 0.7 months, two patients were lost to follow-up, and among the 62 other patients, one (1.7%) had flutter recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The bidirectional CTI block can be assessed quickly and easily using only the ablation and CS catheters for differential pacing.

Impact of catheter ablation in patients with atrial flutter and concurrent heart failure

Background

No studies assessed impact of atrial flutter (AFL) ablation on outcomes in patients with AFL and concurrent heart failure (HF).

Objectives

To assess the effect of AFL ablation on mortality and HF readmissions in patients with AFL and HF.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study identified 15,952 patients with AFL and HF from the 2016–17 Nationwide Readmissions Database. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality and/or HF readmission at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included HF readmission, all-cause mortality, and atrial fibrillation (AF) readmission at 1 year. Propensity score match (1:2) algorithm was used to adjust for confounders. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to generate hazard ratios.

Results

Of the 15,952 patients, 9889 had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and 6063 had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In the matched HFrEF cohort (n = 5421), the primary outcome was significantly lower in patients undergoing ablation (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.61–0.85, P < .001). HF readmission (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61–0.89, P = .001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46–0.85, P = .003), and AF readmission (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.48–0.82, P = .001) were also significantly reduced. In the matched HFpEF cohort (n = 2439), the primary outcome was lower in the group receiving ablation but was not statistically significant (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63–1.01, P = .065).

Conclusion

In patients with AFL and HFrEF, AFL ablation was associated with lower mortality and HF readmissions at 1 year. Patients with AFL and HFpEF did not show a similar significant reduction in the primary outcome.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Definition of success criteria for ablation of typical right atrial flutter with a single-catheter approach: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

The success rate of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation to treat right common flutter is high (up to 95%), but needs bidirectional block confirmation, requiring two or three catheters.

AIM

To describe a new pacing technique using a single catheter to ablate and confirm cavotricuspid isthmus block with differential PR interval measurements.

METHODS

We included 61 patients from five centres, who were referred for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. All patients had cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, and the cavotricuspid isthmus block was confirmed by differential pacing using two or three catheters. The new method consisted of measuring the PR interval on the surface electrocardiogram using pacing from the tip of the ablation catheter on the lateral side (lateral delay) and the septal side (coronary sinus ostium) of the cavotricuspid isthmus line (difference=delta PR interval), before and after cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. We analysed the value of the delta PR interval in predicting bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block as confirmed by standard methods.

RESULTS

Among our patient population (mean age 63±12 years), 39 patients were ablated during sinus rhythm, and 22 during common flutter. Cavotricuspid isthmus block was achieved in all patients but one. Lateral delay and delta PR interval increased significantly after validation of cavotricuspid isthmus block (257±42 vs. 318±50ms and 32±23 vs. 96±22ms, respectively; P<0.0001). A delta PR interval cut-off of ≥70ms had 100% sensitivity and specificity to predict bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-catheter ablation approach to performing cavotricuspid isthmus line based on surface electrocardiogram PR interval measurement is feasible. After ablation, cavotricuspid isthmus block was systematically obtained when the delta PR interval was>70ms.

Conduction Recovery After Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation When Performed With or Without Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to define the association between conduction recovery across the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) and typical atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence when CTI ablation is performed with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with a stand-alone procedure.

BACKGROUND

CTI ablation is commonly performed at the same time as PVI to treat AFL or as an empiric therapy. Conduction recovery is a recognized problem after linear ablation in the left atrium (e.g., mitral isthmus ablation) and is proarrhythmic. Less is known about conduction recovery after CTI ablation and possible differences in outcomes when performed at the time of PVI compared with at the time of a stand-alone procedure.

METHODS

Eligible participants who underwent stand-alone CTI ablation were compared with those who underwent a combined (CTI+PVI) procedure. CTI conduction recovery was assessed at the time of a second ablation. Conduction recovery across the CTI (primary outcome) and recurrence of typical AFL (secondary outcome) were studied using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 295 eligible participants (median age: 64 years [interquartile range: 55 to 69 years]; 33% women), recovery was assessed in 232 and was more common after combined versus stand-alone CTI ablation (52% [72 of 139] vs. 13% [12 of 93]; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, CTI ablation performed as a combined procedure increased odds of CTI conduction recovery 7.8-fold (odds ratio: 7.8; 95% confidence interval: 3.3 to 18.3; p < 0.001) and clinical AFL recurrence 4.1-fold (odds ratio: 4.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 16.9; p = 0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

CTI ablation performed at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher rates of conduction recovery and typical flutter recurrence.

Hypnosis Versus Placebo During Atrial Flutter Ablation: The PAINLESS Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the superiority of hypnosis versus placebo on pain perception and morphine consumption during typical atrial flutter (AFL) ablation.

BACKGROUND

AFL ablation commonly requires intravenous opioid for analgesia, which can be associated with adverse outcomes. Hypnosis is an alternative technique with rising interest, but robust data in electrophysiological procedures are lacking.

METHODS

This single center, randomized controlled trial compared hypnosis and placebo during AFl ablation. In addition to the randomized intervention, all patients were treated according to the institution's standard of care analgesia protocol (administration of 1 mg of intravenous morphine in case of self-reported pain ≥5 on an 11-point numeric rating scale or on demand). The primary endpoint was perceived pain quantified by patients using a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Between October 2017 and September 2019, 113 patients (mean age 70 ± 12 years, 21% women) were randomized to hypnosis (n = 56) or placebo (n = 57). Mean pain score was 4.0 ± 2.2 in the hypnosis group versus 5.5 ± 1.8 in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Pain perception, assessed every 5 min during the whole procedure, was consistently lower in the hypnosis group. Patients' sedation scores were also better in the hypnosis group than in the placebo group (8.3 ± 2.2 vs. 5.4 ± 2.5; p < 0.001). Finally, morphine requirements were significantly lower in the hypnosis group (1.3 ± 1.3 mg) compared with the placebo group (3.6 ± 1.8 mg; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this first randomized trial, hypnosis during AFL ablation was superior to placebo for alleviating pain and reducing morphine consumption.

3D navigation system allows remarkable reduction in fluoroscopy use during cavo-tricuspid isthmus ablation

PURPOSE

Typical atrial flutter (AFL) is one of the most common supraventricular arrhythmias. Its treatment mainly relies on cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, which can be performed either using conventional fluoroscopy, still mainly used, or 3D navigation system to track the position of the catheter. The aim of this study is to show that the use of a 3D navigation system allows a dramatic reduction of fluoroscopy use during CTI ablation, without any loss of efficacy, time, or safety.

METHODS

In this single-center study, we retrospectively compared 134 cases of CTI ablation performed for typical AFL without a 3D navigation system with 95 cases of CTI ablation performed with such a 3D system. We compared the rates of procedural success (defined as obtaining a bidirectional electrical conduction block), freedom from AFL recurrence at 1-year follow-up, procedural time and safety, and fluoroscopy use.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional fluoroscopy, the use of a 3D navigation system significantly decreased the duration of fluoroscopy use (2 min 13 s ± 2 min 16 s versus 14 min 41 s ± 10 min 39 s, p < 0.0001) and dose-area products (1567.9 ± 1329.5 mGy cm² versus 8263.3 ± 8636.6 mGy cm², p < 0.0001). Procedure success rates, duration, and safety were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 3D navigation during CTI ablation substantially reduces fluoroscopy use duration, without reducing the success rates and safety or prolonging the procedure duration, as compared to conventional fluoroscopy. We therefore suggest the generalization of this navigation system.

Management of cardiac conduction abnormalities and arrhythmia in aircrew

Cardiovascular diseasesⁱ are the most common cause of loss of flying licence globally, and cardiac arrhythmia is the main disqualifier in a substantial proportion of aircrew. Aircrewⁱⁱ often operate within a demanding physiological environment, that potentially includes exposure to sustained acceleration (usually resulting in a positive gravitational force, from head to feet (+Gz)) in high performance aircraft. Aeromedical assessment is complicated further when trying to discriminate between benign and potentially significant rhythm abnormalities in aircrew, many of whom are young and fit, have a resultant high vagal tone, and among whom underlying cardiac disease has a low prevalence. In cases where a significant underlying aetiology is plausible, extensive investigation is often required and where appropriate should include review by an electrophysiologist. The decision regarding restriction of flying activity will be dependent on several factors including the underlying arrhythmia, associated pathology, risk of incapacitation and/or distraction, the type of aircraft operated, and the specific flight or mission criticality of the role performed by the individual aircrew.

Risk of Atrial Fibrillation after Ablation of Cavotricuspid Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter: Is Combined Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Worthwhile?

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter can be performed when both arrythmias had been recorded before the procedure. However, the best approach has not been defined in case of patients referred for ablation with CTI-dependent atrial flutter, without history of AF.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence and to identify predictors of the first episode of AF after ablation of CTI-dependent atrial flutter in patients without history of AF.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of patients with CTI-dependent atrial flutter without history of AF undergoing catheter ablation. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients who developed AF and those who did not have AF after the procedure. Significance level was set at 5%. In the analysis of predicting factors, the primary outcome was occurrence of AF after CTI-dependent atrial flutter ablation.

RESULTS

Of a total of 227 patients undergoing ablation of CTI-dependent atrial flutter (110 with history of AF and 33 without adequate follow-up), 84 were included, and 45 (53.6%) developed post-ablation AF. The HATCH and CHA2DS2-VASC scores were not different between the groups. Recurrence rate of CTI-dependent atrial flutter and complication rate were 11.5% and 1.2%, respectively, after ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ablation of CTI-dependent atrial flutter is a safe and effective procedure, 50% of the patients developed AF after the procedure. However, the role of combined ablation (CTI-dependent atrial flutter plus AF) aiming at preventing AF is still uncertain. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; [online].ahead print, PP.0-0).

Multicentre randomised trial comparing contact force with electrical coupling index in atrial flutter ablation (VERISMART trial)

Introduction

Electrical coupling index (ECI) and contact force (CF) have been developed to aid lesion formation during catheter ablation. ECI measures tissue impedance and capacitance whilst CF measures direct contact. The aim was to determine whether the presence of catheter / tissue interaction information, such as ECI and CF, reduce time to achieve bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block during atrial flutter (AFL) ablation.

Methods

Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AFL were randomised to CF visible (range 5-40g), CF not visible, ECI visible (change of 12%) or ECI not visible. Follow-up occurred at 3 and 6 months and included a 7 day ECG recording. The primary endpoint was time to bidirectional cavotricuspid isthmus block.

Results

114 patients were randomised, 16 were excluded. Time to bidirectional block was significantly shorter when ECI was visible (median 30.0 mins (IQR 31) to median 10.5mins (IQR 12) p 0.023) versus ECI not visible. There was a trend towards a shorter time to bidirectional block when CF was visible. Higher force was applied when CF was visible (median 9.03g (IQR 7.4) vs. 11.3g (5.5) p 0.017). There was no difference in the acute recurrence of conduction between groups. The complication rate was 2%, AFL recurrence was 1.1% and at 6 month follow-up, 12% had atrial fibrillation.

Conclusion

The use of tissue contact information during AFL ablation was associated with reduced time taken to achieve bidirectional block when ECI was visible. Contact force data improved contact when visible with a trend towards a reduction in the procedural endpoint.

ClinicalTrials.gov trial identifier: NCT02490033.

Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-analysis of Safety and Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) are the main treatments used for atrial fibrillation (AF). In recent years, a number of articles comparing the 2 treatments have begun to emerge. Though, the influence of follow-up time in the meta-analysis was not considered in these articles. However, more recently, large-scale clinical trial articles have included follow-up with the patients up to 5 years after treatment. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the impact of variable follow-up times on the recurrence of AF by observing both the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of catheter ablation and AADs for the treatment of AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The primary investigators of eligible randomized controlled trials were invited to contribute standardized outcome data. Random effect summary estimates were calculated as standardized mean differences and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for continuous and binary outcomes. In this study, 9 randomized controlled trials (n = 1542 patients) were included. The rate of recurrence of AF with no limit on follow-up time, >12 months, >18 months, >24 months, >30 months, and approximately 36 months was compared. Furthermore, the gap between the RFA and AAD groups in the recurrence rate of AF was found to decrease inversely to follow-up time. When the follow-up time reached 24 months, the difference between RFA and AAD was relatively stable with an odds ratio of 0.45 (95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.62). Overall, RFA decreased adverse events in the remaining trials; however, AAD performed better in terms of safety and had fewer adverse events with RFA usually causing more serious complications.

CONCLUSION

RFA is more advantageous in terms of recurrence rate of AF than drug therapy. In addition, the analysis suggests that this effect persists during long-term follow-up; however, these benefits appear to decrease with longer follow-up time. Finally, AAD performed better in terms of safety and had fewer adverse events.