Definition of success criteria for ablation of typical right atrial flutter with a single-catheter approach: A pilot study

Outcomes of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent flutter ablation: randomized study comparing single vs. multiple catheter procedures-the SIMPLE study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with symptomatic typical AFl. Although the conventional multi-catheter approach is the standard of care for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, a single-catheter approach was recently described as a feasible alternative. The present study sought to compare safety, efficacy, and efficiency of single vs. multi-catheter approach for atrial flutter (AFl) ablation.

METHODS

In this randomized multi-center study, consecutive patients referred for AFl ablation (n = 253) were enrolled and randomized to multiple vs. single-catheter approach for CTI ablation. In the single-catheter arm, PR interval (PRI) on the surface ECG was used to prove CTI block. Procedural and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two arms.

RESULTS

128 and 125 patients were assigned to the single-catheter and to the multi-catheter arms, respectively. In the single-catheter arm, procedure time was significantly shorter (37 ± 25 vs. 48 ± 27 minutes, p = 0.002) and required less fluoroscopy time (430 ± 461 vs. 712 ± 628 seconds, p < 0.001) and less radiofrequency time (428 ± 316 vs. 643 ± 519 seconds, p < 0.001), achieving a higher first-pass CTI block rate (55 (45%) vs. 37 (31%), p = 0.044), compared with the multi-catheter arm. After a median follow-up of 12 months, 11 (4%) patients experienced AFl recurrences (5 (4%) in the single-catheter arm and 6 (5%) in the multi-catheter arm, p = 0.99). No differences were found in arrhythmia-free survival between arms (log-rank = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

The single-catheter approach for typical AFl ablation is not inferior to the conventional multiple-catheter approach, reducing procedure, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency time.

Single-catheter simplified stepwise approach to persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: A feasibility study

BACKGROUND

The strategy for atrial fibrillation ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation remains controversial. A single-catheter approach was recently validated for pulmonary vein isolation.

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility of this approach to performing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, if needed.

METHODS

We prospectively included 159 consecutive patients referred to our centre for a first persistent atrial fibrillation ablation between January 2018 and December 2018. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation. If the patient was still in atrial fibrillation (spontaneously or inducible), we subsequently performed a stepwise approach, including roof line, anterior mitral line, posterior box lesion and cavotricuspid isthmus line. Finally, if patient remained in atrial fibrillation at the end of the procedure, a synchronized direct-current cardioversion was applied to restore sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

At baseline, 54 patients were in sinus rhythm and underwent pulmonary vein isolation. For patients in atrial fibrillation, after pulmonary vein isolation and ablation of additional lines, if needed, 18 patients were converted to atrial tachycardia and one directly to sinus rhythm; 96 were still in atrial fibrillation and underwent direct-current cardioversion. After a mean follow-up of 17±6 months, 57 patients (36%) experienced atrial arrhythmia recurrence. No deaths, tamponades or phrenic nerve injuries were observed following the procedure. The main mode of arrhythmia recurrence was atrial fibrillation in 75% of cases and atrial tachycardia in 25% of cases.

CONCLUSION

A single-catheter approach, including pulmonary vein isolation and atrial lines, is feasible and safe in patients undergoing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, with an acceptable success rate of 64% at mid-term follow-up.