Temporal decline in defibrillation thresholds with an active pectoral lead system

Frequency characteristics and associations with the defibrillation threshold of ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

OBJECTIVE

The dominant frequency (DF) in frequency analyses is considered to represent the objective cycle length and complexity of activation under conditions of ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, knowledge regarding the mechanisms determining the DF in human VF is limited. We studied the characteristics of the DF of human VF and relationship between DF and the defibrillation threshold.

METHODS

Seventy-two implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients and 211 VF were studied. Using defibrillation tests, we performed a frequency analysis with fast Fourier transformation. The correlations between DF and clinical characteristics, including the defibrillation threshold, were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean DF of all induced VFs was 5.2±0.8 Hz. The patients were divided into two groups according to DF: the low-DF (DF <5.2 Hz, n=32) and high-DF (DF ≥5.2 Hz, n=40) groups. The frequency of structural heart disease was significantly higher in the low-DF group. In addition, the QRS duration, QT interval and effective refractory period of the right ventricle (RV-ERP) were significantly longer in the low-DF group. A multivariate analysis showed RV-ERP to be the only independent predictor of DF. Excluding patients receiving group III anti-arrhythmic drugs, which are known to have potent defibrillation threshold effects, the defibrillation threshold was significantly lower in the low-DF group (p=0.026).

CONCLUSION

We found that the DF of human VF is associated with underlying heart disease, the cardiac function, cardiac conduction, ventricular refractoriness and defibrillation threshold. Our findings may be useful for identifying and managing patients with a high defibrillation threshold.

Utility of postoperative testing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can provide life-saving therapies for ventricular arrhythmias. Arrhythmia induction and defibrillation threshold testing is often performed at implantation and postoperatively during long-term follow-up to ensure proper device function.

METHODS

We sought to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of occult device malfunction at follow-up defibrillation testing in asymptomatic individuals. A cohort of 853 patients underwent 1,578 defibrillation tests during the 13-year study period. Defibrillation efficacy was evaluated primarily by the two-shock (2S) method, with an adequate safety margin ≥ 10 joules (J) less than the maximum energy delivered by the ICD.

RESULTS

A total of 38 testing failures requiring intervention were discovered during testing (2.4% of all tests). There were 11 ICD system failures resulting in failure to defibrillate, six with underdetection of ventricular fibrillation, and 21 clinically significant increases in defibrillation threshold. There was a higher incidence of failure in older ICD systems (1996-2002) compared to newer ICD systems (2003-2009), reaching statistical significance (3.6% vs 1.0%; P < 0.01). There were 178 subjects (20.8%) with a >20-J safety margin on previous testing, detected R waves >7.0 mV, and all system components implanted after 2003 at the time of testing who did not have any testing failures (0% vs 5.6%; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Postoperative defibrillation testing identifies a small number of ICD malfunctions in asymptomatic individuals. ICD testing failure is seen more frequently in older systems and in those with borderline results from prior interrogation or testing. These findings suggest that serial postoperative defibrillation testing is not indicated in asymptomatic patients without suspicion for specific problems.

QRS prolongation is associated with high defibrillation thresholds during cardioverter-defibrillator implantations in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Although high defibrillation threshold (DFT) is a major and unavoidable clinical problem after implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), little is known about the cause and management of a high DFT in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The purpose of this study was to assess the predictors of a high DFT in patients with HCM.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-three patients with non-dilated HCM who underwent ICD implantation were included. The DFT at the time of the device implantation was measured in all patients. The patients were divided into 2 groups, a high DFT group (DFT >or=15J, n=13) and a low DFT group (DFT <15J, n=10); and their baseline characteristics were compared. The QRS duration was longer in the high than in the low DFT group (128 +/-31 vs 103 +/-12 ms, respectively; P=0.02). QRS duration, left ventricular (LV) end-systolic diameter, and LV ejection fraction were significant predictors of DFT in univariate analysis. However, in multivariate analysis, the only factor significantly associated with DFT was QRS duration (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

QRS duration is the most consistent predictor of a high DFT in HCM patients undergoing ICD implantation.

Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system

INTRODUCTION

Many patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have older lead systems, which are usually not replaced at the time of pulse generator replacement unless a malfunction is noted. Therefore, optimization of defibrillation with these lead systems is clinically important. The objective of this prospective study was to determine if an active abdominal pulse generator (Can) affects chronic defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population consisted of 39 patients who presented for routine abdominal pulse generator replacement. Each patient underwent two assessments of DFT using a step-down protocol, with the order of testing randomized. The distal right ventricular (RV) coil was the anode for the first phase of the biphasic shocks. The proximal superior vena cava (SVC) coil was the cathode for the Lead Alone configuration (RV --> SVC). For the Active Can configuration, the SVC coil and Can were connected electrically as the cathode (RV --> SVC + Can). The Active Can configuration was associated with a significant decrease in shock impedance (39.5 +/- 5.8 Omega vs. 50.0 +/- 7.6 Omega, P < 0.01) and a significant increase in peak current (8.3 +/- 2.6 A vs. 7.2 +/- 2.4 A, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in DFT energy (9.0 +/- 4.6 J vs. 9.8 +/- 5.2 J) or leading edge voltage (319 +/- 86 V vs. 315 +/- 83 V). An adequate safety margin for defibrillation (> or =10 J) was present in all patients with both shocking configurations.

CONCLUSION

DFTs are similar with the Active Can and Lead Alone configurations when a dual-coil, transvenous lead is used with a left abdominal pulse generator. Since most commercially available ICDs are only available with an active can, our data support the use of an active can device with this lead system for patients who present for routine pulse generator replacement.

Utility of Routine Follow-Up Defibrillator Threshold Testing in Congenital Heart Disease and Pediatric Populations

INTRODUCTION

Recent studies have suggested that routine defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in adults may not be necessary. The congenital heart disease and pediatric populations are a unique group of ICD recipients having a higher incidence of lead failure. We investigated the utility of follow-up DFT testing in this population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The records of 155 ICD recipients at one center were retrospectively reviewed, and patients having one or more follow-up DFT tests were analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups. The "routine" group consisted of 58 follow-up DFT procedures in 46 patients, without known changes in ICD parameters. The "prompted" group consisted of 21 follow-up DFT procedures in 18 patients, motivated by clinical concerns about changes in ICD lead status. Of 58 "routine" DFTs performed at a mean postimplant duration of 32 +/- 23 months (range 2-78), 7 (12%) had reprogramming, and 1 required a hardware change as a result of the testing. Of the 21 "prompted" DFTs performed, 7 required device reprogramming, and 3 required hardware upgrade. Overall, 19 (24%) of 79 procedures detected clinically significant changes, requiring reprogramming or ICD system revision. No complications were seen from follow-up DFT testing.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of abnormalities was found at follow-up DFT testing in this population, especially in the group of patients with clinically prompted testing. Clinically indicated DFT testing, as expected, has a high yield of important information on device function in congenital heart disease and pediatric populations.

Distal Right Ventricular Coil Position Reduces Defibrillation Thresholds

Distal RV Coil Position Reduces DFTs.

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the factors that affect defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) has important implications both for optimization of defibrillation efficacy and for the design of new transvenous leads. The aim of this prospective study was to test the hypothesis that defibrillation efficacy is improved with the right ventricular (RV) coil in a distal position compared with a more proximal RV coil position.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A novel defibrillation lead with three adjacent RV defibrillation coils (distal 0.8 cm, middle 3.7 cm, proximal 0.8 cm) was used for this study to permit comparison of DFTs with the proximal and distal RV coil positions without lead repositioning. In the distal RV configuration, the distal and middle RV coils were connected electrically as the anode for defibrillation. In the proximal RV configuration, the middle and proximal coils were the anode. A superior vena cava (SVC) coil and active can were connected electrically as the cathode (reversed polarity, RV-->Can+SVC). In each patient, the DFT was measured twice using a binary search protocol with the distal RV and proximal RV configurations, with the order of testing randomized. The study cohort consisted of 31 subjects (mean age 65 +/- 12 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 30% +/- 16%, 81% male predominance). The mean delivered energy (8.2 +/- 5.3 J vs 11.2 +/- 6.1 J), leading-edge voltage (335 +/- 109 V vs 393 +/- 118 V), and peak current (11.6 +/- 5.2 A vs 14.9 +/- 7.3 A) at DFT all were significantly lower with the distal RV configuration compared to the proximal RV configuration (P < 0.01 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

DFTs are significantly reduced with the distal RV configuration compared to the proximal RV configuration. Defibrillation leads should be designed with the shortest tip to coil distance that can be achieved without compromising ventricular fibrillation sensing.

High defibrillation thresholds in transvenous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications

The aim of this study was to identify clinical characteristics that distinguish patients with high DFTs and assess the prognostic implication. DFTs testing is a lengthy, potentially painful, and a hazardous process. Little information is available concerning the identification of patients with high DFT who undergo ICD surgery with transvenous leads and biphasic energy. This study analyzed 968 patients from two separate clinical studies who received a Medtronic cardioverter defibrillator from January 1995 through November 1999 and who had DFT testing measured by a binary search protocol. Compared to 865 patients with low defibrillation thresholds (< 18 J), the 103 patients with high thresholds (> or = 18 J) had a lower LVEF (34 +/- 16.7 vs 38.3 +/- 16.2%, P = 0.01), a worse NYHA functional class (23% Class I, 43% Class II, 29% Class III, 5% Class IV vs. 27% Class I, 55% Class II, 17% Class III, 1% Class IV, P < 0.0001), had bypass surgery less often (10.7 vs 27.5%, P < 0.0001), used amiodarone within the past 6 weeks (42.7 vs 27.2%, P = 0.002), and had a history of ventricular fibrillation more often (44.7 vs 33.1%, P = 0.02). Information concerning the number of shocks delivered was available in 345 (35%) patients; 23 were in the high DFT group and 322 were in the low DFT group. Twelve (52%) of the 23 patients in the high DFT arm received 3.6 +/- 2.7 shocks (median 2.5) and 106 (33%) of the 322 patients with low DFT received 4.9 +/- 9.5 shocks (median 2). After 6 months the mortality rate of patients with high thresholds was 11.7 vs 7.8% in patients with low thresholds (P = 0.118). Using a multivariate logistic regression model the significant predictors of death were older age, higher NYHA class, lower LVEF, amiodarone use, had a presenting arrhythmia of ventricular fibrillation and CHF but not initial high defibrillation thresholds. The study found that (1) 11% of patients have high DFTs, (2) clinical characteristics that identify high defibrillation thresholds are NYHA Class III, IV, low ejection fraction, no previous history of bypass surgery, prior amiodarone use preoperatively, and presenting with ventricular fibrillation, and (3) while high DFTs were associated with a more ill patient population, there was no difference in survival in a 6-month follow-up. Patients with a predicted low DFTs may be eligible for abbreviated ICD testing while high risk patients require formal testing.