Lack of evidence for peripheral alpha(1)- adrenoceptor blockade during long-term treatment of heart failure with carvedilol

Effects of carvedilol on human prostate tissue contractility and stromal cell growth pointing to potential clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Apart from antagonizing ß-adrenoceptors, carvedilol antagonizes vascular α1-adrenoceptors and activates G protein-independent signaling. Even though it is a commonly used antihypertensive and α1-adrenoceptors are essential for the treatment of voiding symptoms in benign prostatic hyperplasia, its actions in the human prostate are still unknown. Here, we examined carvedilol effects on contractions of human prostate tissues, and on stromal cell growth.

METHODS

Contractions of prostate tissues from radical prostatectomy were induced by electric field stimulation (EFS) or α1-agonists. Growth-related functions were examined in cultured stromal cells.

RESULTS

Concentration-response curves for phenylephrine, methoxamine and noradrenaline were right shifted by carvedilol (0.1-10 µM), around half a magnitude with 100 nM, half to one magnitude with 1 µM, and two magnitudes with 10 µM. Right shifts were reflected by increased EC50 values for agonists, with unchanged Emax values. EFS-induced contractions were reduced by 21-54% with 0.01-1 µM carvedilol, and by 94% by 10 µM. Colony numbers of stromal cells were increased by 500 nM, but reduced by 1-10 µM carvedilol, while all concentrations reduced colony size. Decreases in viability were time-dependent with 0.1-0.3 µM, but complete with 10 µM. Proliferation was slightly increased by 0.1-0.5 µM, but reduced with 1-10 µM.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol antagonizes α1-adrenoceptors in the human prostate, starting with concentrations in ranges of known plasma levels. In vitro, effect sizes resemble those of α1-blockers used for the treatment of voiding symptoms, which requires concentrations beyond plasma levels. Bidirectional and dynamic effects on the growth of stromal cells may be attributed to "biased agonism".

The alpha-1A adrenergic receptor regulates mitochondrial oxidative metabolism in the mouse heart

AIMS

The sympathetic nervous system regulates numerous critical aspects of mitochondrial function in the heart through activation of adrenergic receptors (ARs) on cardiomyocytes. Mounting evidence suggests that α1-ARs, particularly the α1A subtype, are cardioprotective and may mitigate the deleterious effects of chronic β-AR activation by shared ligands. The mechanisms underlying these adaptive effects remain unclear. Here, we tested the hypothesis that α1A-ARs adaptively regulate cardiomyocyte oxidative metabolism in both the uninjured and infarcted heart.

METHODS

We used high resolution respirometry, fatty acid oxidation (FAO) enzyme assays, substrate-specific electron transport chain (ETC) enzyme assays, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and proteomics to characterize mitochondrial function comprehensively in the uninjured hearts of wild type and α1A-AR knockout mice and defined the effects of chronic β-AR activation and myocardial infarction on selected mitochondrial functions.

RESULTS

We found that isolated cardiac mitochondria from α1A-KO mice had deficits in fatty acid-dependent respiration, FAO, and ETC enzyme activity. TEM revealed abnormalities of mitochondrial morphology characteristic of these functional deficits. The selective α1A-AR agonist A61603 enhanced fatty-acid dependent respiration, fatty acid oxidation, and ETC enzyme activity in isolated cardiac mitochondria. The β-AR agonist isoproterenol enhanced oxidative stress in vitro and this adverse effect was mitigated by A61603. A61603 enhanced ETC Complex I activity and protected contractile function following myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Collectively, these novel findings position α1A-ARs as critical regulators of cardiomyocyte metabolism in the basal state and suggest that metabolic mechanisms may underlie the protective effects of α1A-AR activation in the failing heart.

Normal and excessive muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure: implications for future trials of therapeutic autonomic modulation

AIMS

Patients with sympathetic excess are those most likely to benefit from novel interventions targeting the autonomic nervous system. To inform such personalized therapy, we identified determinants of augmented muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in heart failure, versus healthy controls.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared data acquired in 177 conventionally-treated, stable non-diabetic patients in sinus rhythm, aged 18-79 years (149 males; 28 females; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 25 ± 11% [mean ± standard deviation]; range 5-60%), and, concurrently, under similar conditions, in 658 healthy, normotensive volunteers (398 males; aged 18-81 years). In heart failure, MSNA ranged between 7 and 90 bursts·min^-1 , proportionate to heart rate (p < 0.0001) and body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.03), but was unrelated to age, blood pressure, or drug therapy. Mean MSNA, adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and heart rate, was greater in heart failure (+14.2 bursts·min^-1 ; 95% confidence interval [CI] 12.1-16.3; p < 0.0001), but lower in women (-5.0 bursts·min^-1 ; 95% CI 3.4-6.6; p < 0.0001). With spline modeling, LVEF accounted for 9.8% of MSNA variance; MSNA related inversely to LVEF below an inflection point of ∼21% (p < 0.006), but not above. Burst incidence was greater in ischaemic than dilated cardiomyopathy (p = 0.01), and patients with sleep apnoea (p = 0.03). Burst frequency correlated inversely with stroke volume (p < 0.001), cardiac output (p < 0.001), and peak oxygen consumption (p = 0.002), and directly with norepinephrine (p < 0.0001) and peripheral resistance (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Burst frequency and incidence exceeded normative values in only ∼53% and ∼33% of patients. Such diversity encourages selective deployment of sympatho-modulatory therapies. Clinical characteristics can highlight individuals who may benefit from future personalized interventions targeting pathological sympathetic activation.

The 2021 Carl Ludwig Lecture. Unsympathetic autonomic regulation in heart failure: patient-inspired insights

Defined as a structural or functional cardiac abnormality accompanied by symptoms, signs, or biomarkers of altered ventricular pressures or volumes, heart failure also is a state of autonomic disequilibrium. A large body of evidence affirms that autonomic disturbances are intrinsic to heart failure; basal or stimulated sympathetic nerve firing or neural norepinephrine (NE) release more often than not exceed homeostatic need, such that an initially adaptive adrenergic or vagal reflex response becomes maladaptive. The magnitude of such maladaptation predicts prognosis. This Ludwig lecture develops two theses: the elucidation and judiciously targeted amelioration of maladaptive autonomic disturbances offers opportunities to complement contemporary guideline-based heart failure therapy, and serendipitous single-participant insights, acquired in the course of experimental protocols with entirely different intent, can generate novel insight, inform mechanisms, and launch entirely new research directions. I précis six elements of our current synthesis of the causes and consequences of maladaptive sympathetic disequilibrium in heart failure, shaped by patient-inspired epiphanies: arterial baroreceptor reflex modulation, excitation stimulated by increased cardiac filling pressure, paradoxical muscle sympathetic activation as a peripheral neurogenic constraint on exercise capacity, renal sympathetic restraint of natriuresis, coexisting sleep apnea, and augmented chemoreceptor reflex sensitivity and then conclude by envisaging translational therapeutic opportunities.

Cardiovascular Autonomic Disturbances in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), diminished tonic and reflex vagal heart rate modulation and exaggerated sympathetic outflow and neural norepinephrine release are evident from disease inception. Each of these disturbances of autonomic regulation has been independently associated with shortened survival, and β-adrenoceptor antagonism and therapeutic autonomic modulation by other means have been demonstrated, in clinical trials, to lessen symptoms and prolong survival. In contrast, data concerning the autonomic status of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are comparatively sparse. Little is known concerning the prognostic consequences of autonomic dysregulation in such individuals, and therapies applied with success in HFrEF have in most trials failed to improve symptoms or survival of those with HFpEF. A recent HFpEF Expert Scientific Panel report emphasised that without a deeper understanding of the pathophysiology of HFpEF, establishing effective treatment will be challenging. One aspect of such pathology may be cardiovascular autonomic disequilibrium, often worsened by acute exercise or routine daily activity. This review aims to summarise existing knowledge concerning parasympathetic and sympathetic function of patients with HFpEF, consider potential mechanisms and specific consequences of autonomic disturbances that have been identified, and propose hypotheses for future investigation.

Cardiac α1A-adrenergic receptors: emerging protective roles in cardiovascular diseases

α1-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) are catecholamine-activated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are expressed in mouse and human myocardium and vasculature, and play essential roles in the regulation of cardiovascular physiology. Though α1-ARs are less abundant in the heart than β1-ARs, activation of cardiac α1-ARs results in important biologic processes such as hypertrophy, positive inotropy, ischemic preconditioning, and protection from cell death. Data from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) indicate that nonselectively blocking α1-ARs is associated with a twofold increase in adverse cardiac events, including heart failure and angina, suggesting that α1-AR activation might also be cardioprotective in humans. Mounting evidence implicates the α1A-AR subtype in these adaptive effects, including prevention and reversal of heart failure in animal models by α1A agonists. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of cardiac α1A-ARs.

Cardiac and Vascular α1-Adrenoceptors in Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

As heart failure (HF) is a devastating health problem worldwide, a better understanding and the development of more effective therapeutic approaches are required. HF is characterized by sympathetic system activation which stimulates α- and β-adrenoceptors (ARs). The exposure of the cardiovascular system to the increased locally released and circulating levels of catecholamines leads to a well-described downregulation and desensitization of β-ARs. However, information on the role of α-AR is limited. We have performed a systematic literature review examining the role of both cardiac and vascular α1-ARs in HF using 5 databases for our search. All three α1-AR subtypes (α1A, α1B and α1D) are expressed in human and animal hearts and blood vessels in a tissue-dependent manner. We summarize the changes observed in HF regarding the density, signaling and responses of α1-ARs. Conflicting findings arise from different studies concerning the influence that HF has on α1-AR expression and function; in contrast to β-ARs there is no consistent evidence for down-regulation or desensitization of cardiac or vascular α1-ARs. Whether α1-ARs are a therapeutic target in HF remains a matter of debate.

Influence of chronic kidney disease and haemodialysis treatment on pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers

AIM

The present study evaluated the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of nebivolol enantiomers in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in patients undergoing haemodialysis.

METHODS

Forty-three adult patients were distributed into three groups: healthy volunteers and hypertensive patients with normal kidney function (n = 22); patients with stage 3 and 4 CKD (n = 11); and patients with stage 5 CKD undergoing haemodialysis (n = 10). The subjects received a single oral dose of 10 mg racemic nebivolol. Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 h after administration of the drug and heart rate variation was measured over the same interval during the isometric handgrip test. The nebivolol enantiomers in plasma were analysed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetics of nebivolol is enantioselective, with a greater plasma proportion of l-nebivolol. CKD increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of l-nebivolol (6.83 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 9.94 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.15 ng.h ml(-1) vs. 7.30 ng.h ml(-1) ) when compared with the control group. However, the AUC values of l-nebivolol (6.41 ng.h ml(-1) ) and d-nebivolol (4.95 ng.h ml(-1) ) did not differ between the haemodialysis and control groups. The administration of a single dose of 10 mg nebivolol did not alter the heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise in the investigated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage 3 and 4 CKD increases the plasma concentrations of both nebivolol enantiomers, while haemodialysis restores the pharmacokinetic parameters to values similar to those observed in the control group. No significant difference in heart rate variation induced by isometric exercise was observed between the investigated groups after the administration of a single oral dose of 10 mg nebivolol.

Time and technology will tell: the pathophysiologic basis of neurohormonal modulation in heart failure

The central roles of neurohormonal abnormalities in the pathobiology of heart failure have been defined in recent decades. Experiments have revealed both systemic involvement and intricate subcellular regulation by circulating effectors of the sympathetic nervous system, the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, and others. Randomized clinical trials substantiated these findings, establishing neurohormonal antagonists as cornerstones of heart failure pharmacotherapy, and occasionally offering further insight on mode of benefit. This review discusses the use of β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and aldosterone receptor antagonists in the treatment of heart failure, with particular attention to the pathophysiologic basis and mechanisms of action.

Polypharmacy in heart failure: drugs to use and avoid

Polypharmacy, the use of 4 or more medications, is universal in patients with heart failure (HF). Evidence-based combination therapy is prescribed in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Additionally, treatment of the high prevalence of comorbidities presents many therapeutic dilemmas. The use of nonprescription medications is common, adding further complexity to the medication therapy regimens of patients with HF. An approach for combining evidence-based therapies in patients with HFrEF is presented. Strategies for optimizing the management of common comorbidities in patients with HF are reviewed. Both prescription and nonprescription medications to avoid or use with caution are highlighted.

Nebivolol: vasodilator properties and evidence for relevance in treatment of cardiovascular disease

β-adrenergic blocking agents, a pharmacologically diverse class of cardiovascular medications, are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hypertension and concomitant structural heart disease, and for angina and heart failure. Many within-class differences exist, from pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics to ancillary effects, such as intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, antiarrhythmic activity, α-1 adrenergic receptor blockade affinity, and direct vasodilation. Nebivolol is a third-generation, β1 selective, long acting β-blocker, which causes direct vasodilation via endothelium-dependent nitric oxide stimulation. The vasodilatory actions of nebivolol might result in clinical effects with some distinct properties. Differences from other β-blockers might include improvement of endothelial function, enhancement of forward flow in muscular resistance arteries, maintenance of exercise tolerance, and overall improved tolerability, side effect profile, and adherence. Nebivolol has been shown to be a clinically effective β-blocker for treatment as initial or add-on therapy for systemic hypertension, as an antianginal agent, and as therapy for patients with heart failure. These properties position nebivolol as a treatment option for patients with hypertension and/or structural heart disease, although its precise role in the therapeutic armamentarium remains to be clarified.

Cardiac alpha1-adrenergic receptors: novel aspects of expression, signaling mechanisms, physiologic function, and clinical importance

Adrenergic receptors (AR) are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that have a crucial role in cardiac physiology in health and disease. Alpha1-ARs signal through Gαq, and signaling through Gq, for example, by endothelin and angiotensin receptors, is thought to be detrimental to the heart. In contrast, cardiac alpha1-ARs mediate important protective and adaptive functions in the heart, although alpha1-ARs are only a minor fraction of total cardiac ARs. Cardiac alpha1-ARs activate pleiotropic downstream signaling to prevent pathologic remodeling in heart failure. Mechanisms defined in animal and cell models include activation of adaptive hypertrophy, prevention of cardiac myocyte death, augmentation of contractility, and induction of ischemic preconditioning. Surprisingly, at the molecular level, alpha1-ARs localize to and signal at the nucleus in cardiac myocytes, and, unlike most GPCRs, activate "inside-out" signaling to cause cardioprotection. Contrary to past opinion, human cardiac alpha1-AR expression is similar to that in the mouse, where alpha1-AR effects are seen most convincingly in knockout models. Human clinical studies show that alpha1-blockade worsens heart failure in hypertension and does not improve outcomes in heart failure, implying a cardioprotective role for human alpha1-ARs. In summary, these findings identify novel functional and mechanistic aspects of cardiac alpha1-AR function and suggest that activation of cardiac alpha1-AR might be a viable therapeutic strategy in heart failure.

Alpha-1-adrenergic receptors: targets for agonist drugs to treat heart failure

Evidence from cell, animal, and human studies demonstrates that α1-adrenergic receptors mediate adaptive and protective effects in the heart. These effects may be particularly important in chronic heart failure, when catecholamine levels are elevated and β-adrenergic receptors are down-regulated and dysfunctional. This review summarizes these data and proposes that selectively activating α1-adrenergic receptors in the heart might represent a novel and effective way to treat heart failure. This article is part of a special issue entitled "Key Signaling Molecules in Hypertrophy and Heart Failure."

Microvascular oxygen delivery-to-utilization mismatch at the onset of heavy-intensity exercise in optimally treated patients with CHF

Impaired muscle blood flow at the onset of heavy-intensity exercise may transiently reduce microvascular O(2) pressure and decrease the rate of O(2) transfer from capillary to mitochondria in chronic heart failure (CHF). However, advances in the pharmacological treatment of CHF (e.g., angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and third-generation beta-blockers) may have improved microvascular O(2) delivery to an extent that intramyocyte metabolic inertia might become the main locus of limitation of O(2) uptake (Vo(2)) kinetics. We assessed the rate of change of pulmonary Vo(2) (Vo(2)(p)), (estimated) fractional O(2) extraction in the vastus lateralis (approximately Delta[deoxy-Hb+Mb] by near-infrared spectroscopy), and cardiac output (Qt) during high-intensity exercise performed to the limit of tolerance (Tlim) in 10 optimally treated sedentary patients (ejection fraction = 29 + or - 8%) and 11 controls. Sluggish Vo(2)(p) and Qt kinetics in patients were significantly related to lower Tlim values (P < 0.05). The dynamics of Delta[deoxy-Hb+Mb], however, were faster in patients than controls [mean response time (MRT) = 15.9 + or - 2.0 s vs. 19.0 + or - 2.9 s; P < 0.05] with a subsequent response "overshoot" being found only in patients (7/10). Moreover, tauVo(2)/MRT-[deoxy-Hb+Mb] ratio was greater in patients (4.69 + or - 1.42 s vs. 2.25 + or - 0.77 s; P < 0.05) and related to Qt kinetics and Tlim (R = 0.89 and -0.78, respectively; P < 0.01). We conclude that despite the advances in the pharmacological treatment of CHF, disturbances in "central" and "peripheral" circulatory adjustments still play a prominent role in limiting Vo(2)(p) kinetics and tolerance to heavy-intensity exercise in nontrained patients.

Carvedilol increases blood pressure response to phenylephrine infusion in heart failure subjects with systolic dysfunction: evidence of improved vascular alpha1-adrenoreceptor signal transduction

INTRODUCTION

Alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1)-AR) stimulation produces smooth muscle contraction, vasoconstriction, and myocyte hypertrophy, suggesting a potential therapeutic role for alpha(1)-AR antagonists to reduce cardiac workload and myocardial hypertrophy. Preliminary reports suggest that vascular alpha(1)-ARs are desensitized in heart failure (HF) in a manner similar to myocardial beta(1)-ARs. We examined alpha(1)-AR signal transduction by repeat phenylephrine (PE) infusions in patients with HF receiving chronic carvedilol therapy.

METHODS

Twelve subjects with HF not currently receiving beta-blockers were up-titrated to maximum tolerable doses of carvedilol. Subjects underwent alpha(1)-AR stimulation testing at study baseline, 2 weeks after each dose titration, and 6 months after maintenance of maximum carvedilol dose. Phenylephrine infusions began at 0.5 microg kg(-1) min(-1), with dose titrations every 10 minutes, to a maximum of 5 microg kg(-1) min(-1). Phenylephrine dose response was evaluated by the PE rate required to elicit a 20 mm Hg increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), designated PS(20).

RESULTS

All doses of carvedilol significantly reduced preinfusion measures of heart rate, systolic BP, diastolic BP, and mean arterial pressure. However, carvedilol also produced a paradoxical trend toward PS(20) reduction (indicating increased PE response) that reached significance at the completion of carvedilol dose titration (PS(20) ratio vs baseline = 0.78; P < .001). All effects were maintained over a 6-month treatment period with no evidence of tolerance.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing BP response to PE infusion suggests improvement in vascular alpha(1)-AR signal transduction with chronic carvedilol therapy. This effect is evident despite no detectable tolerance to preinfusion BP reductions. The varying affinities of alpha(1)-AR subtypes for carvedilol and PE may have contributed to this finding.

Carvedilol in the treatment of elderly patients with chronic heart failure

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is common, and increases in incidence and prevalence with age. There are compelling data demonstrating reduced mortality and hospitalizations with adrenergic blockade in older patients with CHF. Despite this, many older patients remain under-treated. The aim of the present article is to review the potential mechanisms of the benefits of adrenergic blockade in CHF and the clinical data available from the large randomized studies, focusing particularly on older patients.

Carvedilol ameliorates endothelial dysfunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

The beta-blocker, carvedilol has an additional endothelium-dependent vasodilating properties in patients with hypertension or heart failure. Whether carvedilol can improve endothelium-dependent relaxation in a diabetic animal model and its mechanism of action are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of carvedilol on the endothelial-response of aortas from diabetic rats and the underlying mechanism. Acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxation, sodium nitroprusside (SNP)-induced endothelium-independent relaxation, and expression of nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3) mRNA were measured in aortas isolated from both non-diabetic and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. The level of NO in serum was also measured 5 weeks after carvedilol administration (1 or 10 mg/kg/day). Endothelium-dependent relaxation declined along with the decrease of serum NO level in aortas from diabetic rats. Treatment with carvedilol for 5 weeks prevented the inhibition of endothelium-dependent relaxation and the decrease of serum NO levels caused by diabetes. The expression of NOS3 mRNA, protein expression and NOS3 phosphorylation at Ser1177 in diabetic rat aorta was very low in untreated diabetic aortas compared with the healthy group. Administration of carvedilol not only significantly increased the expression of NOS3 mRNA but also protein expression and NOS3 phosphorylation at Ser1177 in the healthy and diabetic groups. In conclusion, chronic carvedilol administration significantly ameliorated the endothelial dysfunction in diabetic rat aortas, in which increased NO level, up-regulated NOS3 mRNA and phosphorylation at Ser1177 may be involved.

Effect of adrenergic blockade on plasma adrenomedullin concentration during static handgrip in patients with heart failure

Our previous study showed that static handgrip caused increases in the plasma adrenomedullin (ADM) both in patients with heart failure (HF) and healthy subjects. The present study was designed to determine the role of the sympathetic nervous system in mediating plasma ADM changes during handgrip in patients with HF. Twelve male HF patients (II class NYHA) treated with carvedilol, a non-selective adrenergic blocker (TC) and 12 patients untreated with carvedilol (UC) performed two 3-min bouts of static handgrip at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction, alternately with each hand. At the end of both exercise bouts and in 5 min of the recovery period, plasma ADM and catecholamines were determined. In addition, heart rate, blood pressure and stroke volume (SV) were measured. The baseline plasma ADM, noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (A) levels were similar in the two groups of patients, while SV was higher (P<0.05) in TC than in UC. During exercise plasma ADM concentrations were lower (P<0.05) in TC than in UC, but the handgrip-induced increases in plasma ADM did not differ between the groups. Plasma ADM correlated with NA concentrations (r = 0.764) and with SV (r = -0.435) and increases in plasma ADM expressed as percentage of baseline values correlated with those of plasma NA (r = 0.499), diastolic BP (r = 0.550) and total peripheral resistance (r = 0.435). The study suggests that the sympathetic nervous system may be involved in the stimulation of ADM secretion during static exercise either directly or by changes in the haemodynamic response.

Hemodynamic effects of orally administered carvedilol in healthy conscious dogs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of orally administered carvedilol in healthy dogs with doses that might be used to initiate treatment in dogs with congestive heart failure.

ANIMALS

24 healthy dogs.

PROCEDURE

Dogs were randomly allocated to receive carvedilol PO at a dose of 1.56, 3.125, or 12.5 mg, twice daily for 7 to 10 days; 6 dogs served as controls. Investigators were blinded to group assignment. Hemodynamic variables were recorded prior to administration of the drug on day 1 and then 2, 4, and 6 hours after the morning dose on day 1 and days 7 to 10. Change in heart rate after IV administration of 1microg of isoproterenol/kg and change in systemic arterial blood pressure after IV administration of 8 microg of phenylephrine/kg were recorded 2 and 6 hours after administration of carvedilol.

RESULTS

Administration of carvedilol did not significantly affect resting hemodynamic variables or response to phenylephrine. The interaction of day and carvedilol dose had a significant effect on resting heart rate, but a significant main effect of carvedilol dose on resting heart rate was not detected. Increasing carvedilol dose resulted in a significant linear decrease in heart rate response to isoproterenol.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In healthy conscious dogs, orally administered carvedilol at mean doses from 0.08 to 0.54 mg/kg given twice daily did not affect resting hemodynamics. Over the dose range evaluated, there was a dose-dependent attenuation of the response to isoproterenol, which provided evidence of beta-adrenergic receptor antagonism.

Effects of Different Degrees of Sympathetic Antagonism on Cytokine Network in Patients With Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

The proinflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of heart failure. Recent studies have shown that beta-adrenergic blockade can modulate cytokine production. This study investigates the different impact of different degrees of sympathetic antagonism on circulating levels of cytokines in patients with heart failure resulting from ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDC).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-five patients with IDC were randomly assigned to receive metoprolol or carvedilol in an open-label study. Echocardiographic measurements and circulating levels of tumor necrosis (TNF)-alpha and interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-6 were obtained at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. The 2 beta-blockers significantly improved the left ventricular ejection fraction and reduced end-diastolic and end-systolic volume. The magnitude of these changes was greater with carvedilol than with metoprolol (respectively P < .001, P < .05, and P < .05). Both treatments induced a significant decrease in the levels of cytokines (for all P < .01), but the decrease in TNF-alpha and IL-1beta was more consistent in the carvedilol group ( P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our results support the hypothesis that a more complete block of sympathetic activity by carvedilol induces a greater decrease in the circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines that could explain, at least in part, the better improvement in the left ventricular remodelling and systolic function in patients with IDC.

Long-term oral carvedilol in chronic heart failure

The long-term beta-blockade strategy with carvedilol, metoprolol succinate or bisoprolol is now strongly recommended to reduce the rates of mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Although the benefits observed with such drugs are viewed as a class effect, theoretically, carvedilol might be superior to the other two agents, considering its unique pharmacological profile, which includes a more comprehensive antiadrenergic activity and potentially relevant ancillary properties. So far, carvedilol has been proven to be effective and safe in a broader range of CHF patients than metoprolol and bisoprolol. Moreover, a recent large clinical trial has shown a significantly greater survival benefit with carvedilol as directly compared with metoprolol tartrate. Therefore, carvedilol may be the preferred beta-blocking agent to treat patients with CHF.

Diabetes mellitus and heart failure: basic mechanisms, clinical features, and therapeutic considerations

Diabetic cardiomyopathy encompasses the spectrum from subclinical disease to the full-blown syndrome of congestive heart failure. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is increasing at an alarming rate in the western world. and with it, the frequency of diabetes-related heart failure. There is at least early suggestion that target-driven, long-term, intensified intervention that is aimed at multiple risk factors in patients who have type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria may reduce the risk of macrovascular (cardiovascular) and micro-vascular complications by approximately 50%. Thus, it is imperative that patients, particularly those who are at risk for the cardiovascular dysmetabolic syndrome, be screened aggressively for the presence of glucose intolerance and diabetes. When detected, all metabolic and cardio-vascular parameters should be evaluated and treated aggressively to reach currently recommended clinical targets. Such action will result in great benefit for patients by reducing morbidity and mortality and improving quality of life and will reduce the financial burden that is associated with this epidemic disease.

Impact of 6 months of therapy with carvedilol on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

The long-term effects of carvedilol on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and muscle blood flow at rest and exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (New York Heart Association class II-III) were randomized to carvedilol or placebo. Blood pressure, heart rate, MSNA, and forearm vascular resistance (FVR) at rest and during isometric forearm exercise (10% and 30% maximal voluntary contraction) were assessed before and after 6 months. Seven patients did not complete the study. Paired data were obtained in 19 (carvedilol 12, placebo 7). Carvedilol significantly decreased MSNA levels and heart rate at rest (-13 +/- 2 versus 3 +/- 8 bursts/min, P = .0001 and -16 +/- 3 vs -4 +/- 6 bpm, P = .05, respectively) and peak exercise (30% = -20 +/- 5 versus -3 +/- 7 bursts/min, P = 0.05 and -19 +/- 4 versus -4 +/- 6 bpm, P = 0.03, respectively) when compared with placebo. Carvedilol did not change a magnitude of response of MSNA and heart rate during exercise (-10 +/- 3 versus -7 +/- 2 bursts/min, P = 0.7 and 11 +/- 3 versus 6 +/- 1, P = .6, respectively). FVR was unchanged by carvedilol. When MSNA was quantified by burst incidence, the strength of reduction in MSNA was attenuated but still greater than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol reduces MSNA in patients with CHF. Carvedilol does not reduce FVR at rest or during isometric exercise.

Beta-blockade in the management of systolic dysfunction

The concept that heart failure is simply the consequence of impaired pump function is now outmoded. Congestive heart failure is a neuroendocrine syndrome in with activation of the adrenergic nervous system and specific endocrine pathways is integral to its pathogenesis. It is now clear that chronic increases in adrenergic drive associated with heart failure have detrimental effects on myocardial function. The use of BAAs is now standard therapy for people who develop heart failure caused by systolic dysfunction. Beta-blockade may have a role in the management of dogs with heart failure.

Carvedilol but not metoprolol reduces beta-adrenergic responsiveness after complete elimination from plasma in vivo

BACKGROUND

Carvedilol but not metoprolol exhibits persistent binding to beta-adrenergic receptors (beta-ARs) even after washout in cell culture experiments. Here, we determined the significance of this phenomenon on human beta-ARs in vitro and in vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Experiments were conducted on human atrial trabeculae (n=8 to 10 per group). In the presence of metoprolol, isoproterenol potency was reduced compared with controls (P<0.001). In the presence of carvedilol, isoproterenol identified 2 distinct binding sites of high (36+/-6%; -8.8+/-0.4 log mol/L) and low affinity (-6.5+/-0.2 log mol/L). After beta-blocker washout, isoproterenol potency returned to control values in metoprolol-treated muscles, whereas in carvedilol-treated preparations, isoproterenol potency remained decreased (P<0.001 versus control). In vivo studies were performed in 9 individuals receiving metoprolol succinate (190 mg/d) or carvedilol (50 mg/d) for 11 days in a randomized crossover design. Dobutamine stress echocardiography (5 to 40 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) was performed before, during, and 44 hours after application of study medication. Beta-blocker medication reduced heart rate, heart rate-corrected velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, and cardiac output compared with baseline (P<0.02 to 0.0001). After withdrawal of metoprolol, all parameters returned to baseline values, whereas after carvedilol, all parameters remained reduced (P<0.05 to 0.001) despite complete plasma elimination of carvedilol.

CONCLUSIONS

Carvedilol but not metoprolol inhibits the catecholamine response of the human heart beyond its plasma elimination. The persistent beta-blockade by carvedilol may be explained by binding of carvedilol to an allosteric site of beta-ARs.

Effects of Carvedilol on Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background— The CAPRICORN trial has shown that carvedilol improved outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction treated with ACE inhibitors. The aim of this substudy was to determine the effects of carvedilol on left ventricular remodeling in this patient group.

Methods and Results— Patients entering the CAPRICORN trial from 13 centers in New Zealand, Australia, and Spain were recruited for this echocardiographic substudy. In 127 patients, quantitative 2D echocardiography was performed according to a standard protocol before randomization and repeated after 1, 3, and 6 months of treatment with carvedilol or placebo. Left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction (Simpson’s method), and wall motion score index were determined in a blinded analysis at the Core Echo Laboratory. At 6 months, left ventricular end systolic volume was 9.2 mL less in the carvedilol group than in the placebo group ( P =0.023), and left ventricular ejection fraction was 3.9% higher ( P =0.015). Left ventricular end diastolic volume and wall motion score index were not statistically different between the 2 groups at 6 months.

Conclusions— In patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction treated with ACE inhibitors, carvedilol had a beneficial effect on ventricular remodeling, which may, in part, mediate the substantial clinical beneficial effects of carvedilol in this patient population.

Carvedilol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure

Carvedilol (Dilatrend) blocks beta(1)-, beta(2)- and alpha(1)-adrenoceptors, and has antioxidant and antiproliferative effects. Carvedilol improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) in numerous studies. Moreover, significantly greater increases from baseline in LVEF were seen with carvedilol than with metoprolol in a double-blind, randomised study and in a meta-analysis. Carvedilol also reversed or attenuated left ventricular remodelling in patients with CHF and in those with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (MI). Combined analysis of studies in the US Carvedilol Heart Failure Trials Program (patients had varying severities of CHF; n = 1094) revealed that mortality was significantly lower in carvedilol than in placebo recipients. In addition, the risk of hospitalisation for any cardiovascular cause was significantly lower with carvedilol than with placebo. Mortality was significantly lower with carvedilol than with metoprolol in patients with mild to severe CHF in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET) [n = 3029]. The Carvedilol Prospective Randomised Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) trial (n = 2289) demonstrated that compared with placebo, carvedilol was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint of death or hospitalisation for any reason in severe CHF. All-cause mortality was reduced in patients who received carvedilol in addition to conventional therapy compared with those who received placebo plus conventional therapy in the Carvedilol Post-Infarct Survival Control in LV Dysfunction (CAPRICORN) trial (enrolling 1959 patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute MI). Carvedilol was generally well tolerated in patients with CHF. Adverse events associated with the alpha- and beta-blocking effects of the drug occurred more commonly with carvedilol than with placebo, whereas placebo recipients were more likely to experience worsening heart failure. In conclusion, carvedilol blocks beta(1)-, beta(2)- and alpha(1)-adrenoceptors and has a unique pharmacological profile. It is thought that additional properties of carvedilol (e.g. antioxidant and antiproliferative effects) contribute to its beneficial effects in CHF. Carvedilol improves ventricular function and reduces mortality and morbidity in patients with mild to severe CHF, and should be considered a standard treatment option in this setting. Administering carvedilol in addition to conventional therapy reduces mortality and attenuates myocardial remodelling in patients with left ventricular dysfunction following acute MI. Moreover, mortality was significantly lower with carvedilol than with metoprolol in patients with mild to severe CHF, suggesting that carvedilol may be the preferred beta-blocker.

Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on regional vascular responses to adrenergic stimuli in normal subjects and patients with chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Adrenergic receptor blockers used in the treatment of heart failure have distinct receptor affinity profiles. We hypothesized that alpha-adrenergic-blocking effects of carvedilol would limit vasoconstriction in response to adrenergic stimuli when compared with metoprolol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forearm vascular resistance responses to isometric handgrip and cold pressor test were determined by plethysmography before and during adrenergic receptor blockade in prospective randomized trials. Acute effects were assessed in a crossover trial in normal subjects (single dose of 25 mg carvedilol, 100 mg metoprolol tartrate, and placebo). Chronic effects (25 mg carvedilol BID versus 200 mg extended-release metoprolol succinate daily for 6 months) were assessed in a parallel group trial of chronic heart failure subjects. In normal subjects, carvedilol decreased forearm vascular resistance responses to adrenergic stimuli when compared with metoprolol and placebo (isometric handgrip -3.5 U for carvedilol versus -1.2 U for metoprolol and -2.2 U for placebo, P=0.15; cold pressor test 3.1+/-8.9 U for carvedilol versus 9.0+/-2.7 U for metoprolol and 8.2+/-5.8 U for placebo, P<0.05). In heart failure subjects, vasomotor responses to isometric handgrip and cold pressor test did not differ between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute administration of carvedilol attenuates the vasoconstriction response to adrenergic stimuli when compared with placebo and metoprolol in normal subjects, whereas chronic administration of carvedilol does not attenuate the vasoconstrictor response to adrenergic stimuli when compared with metoprolol in heart failure subjects. These data suggest that long-term benefits of carvedilol in heart failure are not mediated by alpha-adrenergic blockade.

Vasopressor response to angiotensin II infusion in patients with chronic heart failure receiving beta-blockers

BACKGROUND

A synergistic interaction between the angiotensin II (Ang II) type 1 receptor and alpha1-adrenergic receptors has been described. We hypothesized that the nonselective beta-antagonist carvedilol, through its alpha1-adrenergic blocking properties, may modulate vascular reactivity to Ang II in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Accordingly, we compared the vasopressor response to infused Ang II in patients treated with carvedilol and metoprolol, a selective beta-antagonist.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All subjects were treated with carvedilol or metoprolol for at least 3 months. ACE inhibitor therapy was standardized to enalapril 40 mg/d or the maximally tolerated dose. Exogenous Ang II was administered as sequential intravenous bolus injections (2.5 to 30 ng/kg) titrated to a rise in radial artery systolic pressure of > or =20 mm Hg. The dose of Ang II required to elicit a change of 20 mm Hg in radial artery systolic pressure (PD20) defined the vasopressor response to Ang II. Twenty subjects with CHF (mean left ventricular ejection fraction 28+/-9%, New York Heart Association class II [n=13] and III [n=7]) were studied. There was no correlation between plasma Ang II levels and PD20. However, the PD20 was significantly higher in patients treated with carvedilol than in those treated with metoprolol (20 [range 2.5 to 30] versus 5 [range 2.5 to 10] ng/kg, P=0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

The vasopressor response to Ang II infusion in patients treated with carvedilol was significantly lower than in patients treated with metoprolol. Whether this is due to the alpha1-adrenergic blocking or other ancillary properties of carvedilol warrants further investigation.

Present and future pharmacotherapy for heart failure

The pharmacotherapy currently recommended by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for heart failure (HF) is a diuretic, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist and (usually) digitalis. This current treatment of HF may be improved by optimising the dose of ACEI used, as increasing the dose of lisinopril increases its benefits in HF. Selective angiotensin receptor-1 (AT(1)) antagonists are effective alternatives for those who cannot tolerate ACEIs. AT(1) antagonists may also be used in combination with ACEIs, as some studies have shown cumulative benefits for the combination. In addition to being used in Stage IV HF patients, in whom it has a marked benefit, spironolactone should be studied in less severe HF and in the presence of beta-blockers. The use of carvedilol, extended-release metoprolol and bisoprolol should be extended to severe HF patients as these agents have been shown to decrease mortality in this group. The ancillary properties of carvedilol, particularly antagonism at prejunctional beta -adrenoceptors, may give it additional benefits to selective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists. Celiprolol and bucindolol are not the beta-blockers of choice in HF, as they do not decrease mortality. Although digitalis does not reduce mortality, it remains the only option for a long-term positive inotropic effect, as the long-term use of the phosphodiesterase inhibitors is associated with increased mortality. The calcium sensitising drug levosimendan may be useful in the hospital treatment of decompensated HF to increase cardiac output and improve dyspnoea and fatigue. The antiarrhythmic drug amiodarone should probably be used in patients at high risk of arrhythmic or sudden death, although this treatment may soon be superseded by the more expensive implanted cardioverter defibrillators, which are probably more effective and have fewer side effects. The natriuretic peptide nesiritide has recently been introduced for the hospital treatment of decompensated HF. Novel drugs that may be beneficial in the treatment of HF include the vasopeptidase inhibitors and the selective endothelin-A receptor antagonists but these require much more investigation. However, disappointing results have been obtained in a large clinical trial of the tumour necrosis factor alpha antagonist etanercept, where no likelihood of a difference between placebo and etanercept was observed. Small clinical trials with recombinant growth hormone to thicken ventricles in dilated cardiomyopathy have given variable results.