Nadolol and supraventricular tachycardia: an electrophysiologic study

Long-term efficacy and safety of atenolol for supraventricular tachycardia in children

Propranolol, a first-generation nonselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent, is commonly used to treat pediatric arrhythmias. Atenolol, relatively long-acting, cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent, has been successfully used in adults with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). There is only one report on the use of atenolol in children with SVT; and our report is on the first long-term prospective study to evaluate the use of atenolol in children. A group of 22 children < 18 years of age with clinical SVT were enrolled in the study. The tachycardia was documented on electrocardiograms in each case and was confirmed by electrophysiologic studies in some. Once-a-day oral atenolol was started as a monotherapy. Of the 22 children with various types of SVT, 13 (59%) were well controlled on long-term oral atenolol therapy. The effective dose of atenolol ranged between 0.3 and 1.3 mg/kg/day (median effective dose 0.7 mg/kg/day). Five children had some adverse effects. However, none in the successful group of 13 patients required drug discontinuation because of such effects. Once-a-day oral atenolol as a monotherapy is effective and relatively safe for long-term management of SVT during childhood. It is an attractive alternative beta-adrenoceptor blocking agent for the management of pediatric arrhythmias.

Double atrial responses to a single ventricular impulse in long RP' tachycardia

Double atrial responses (DARs) to a single ventricular impulse have been described in patients with long RP' tachycardia. To define the determinants for the occurrence of DARs, 8 cases with long RP' tachycardia were examined. The mechanism of long RP' tachycardia was the orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) involving a slow conducting concealed accessory pathway in 4 cases and uncommon (fast-slow) type of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in the other 4 cases. Programmed and rapid ventricular pacing was performed during sinus rhythm and also rapid ventricular pacing during tachycardia (i.e., entrainment). The retrograde effective refractory period (ERP) and the retrograde maximal 1:1 conduction rate of the fast and slow conducting pathways were examined. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVRT, DARs were observed during programmed and rapid ventricular pacing, performed during sinus rhythm and also during entrainment. In 1 of the 4 cases with AVNRT, DARs were observed only during entrainment. The determinants of DARs in cases with long RP' tachycardia were: (1) presence of two different retrogradely conducting pathways; (2) short ERP of the retrograde fast and slow conducting pathways and a short minimal pacing cycle length at which 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction occurs via these pathways; (3) crucial conduction delay in the slow conducting pathway; and (4) preexisting antegrade unidirectional block in the slow conducting pathway or the antegrade block in the slow conducting pathway produced by collision with a previous retrograde impulse during entrainment.

Differential effect of esmolol on the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) usually involves anterograde conduction over a slowly conducting ("slow") pathway and retrograde conduction over a rapidly conducting ("fast") pathway. A variety of drugs, such as beta blockers, digitalis, and calcium channel blockers, have been reported to prolong AV nodal refractoriness in both the anterograde and retrograde limbs of the circuit. However, few data are available that address whether the fast and slow pathways respond in a quantitatively different manner to drugs such as beta-adrenergic antagonists. In addition, it is not known whether the effects of these agents on refractoriness parallel the effects on conduction in the fast and slow pathways. The present study was performed to measure the effect of the intravenous beta-adrenergic agent, esmolol, on refractoriness and conduction in both the fast and slow AV nodal pathways in patients with AVNRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirteen patients with discontinuous AV nodal conduction properties and typical AVNRT were studied. Anterograde and retrograde AV nodal functional assessment was performed at baseline and following steady-state drug infusion of intravenous esmolol at a dose of 500 micrograms/kg for 1 minute, 150 micrograms/kg per minute for the next 4 minutes, followed by a continuous maintenance infusion of 50 to 100 micrograms/kg per minute. The anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 381 +/- 75 msec at baseline to 453 +/- 92 msec during the infusion of esmolol (P = 0.003). The anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway was also prolonged by esmolol, from 289 +/- 26 msec to 310 +/- 17 msec (P = 0.005). However, the absolute magnitude of the change in the anterograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (+72 +/- 59 msec) was significantly greater than the change in anterograde effective refractory period of the slow pathway (+21 +/- 16 msec, P = 0.01). The mean retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway increased from 276 +/- 46 msec to 376 +/- 61 msec during esmolol infusion (P = 0.03). Retrograde slow pathway conduction that could not be demonstrated at baseline became manifest in three patients during esmolol infusion. In contrast to the effects of esmolol on refractoriness, the AH interval during anterograde slow pathway conduction prolonged to a far greater extent (+84 msec) than the HA interval associated with retrograde fast pathway conduction (+5 msec, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The beta-adrenergic antagonist, esmolol, has a quantitatively greater effect on anterograde refractoriness of the fast than the slow AV nodal pathway. However, the effects on conduction intervals during AVNRT are greater in the anterograde slow pathway than in the retrograde fast pathway. These observations suggest that the fast and slow pathways may have differential sensitivities to autonomic influences. This difference in the response to beta-adrenergic antagonists may be exploited as a clinically useful method for demonstrating slow pathway conduction in some individuals with AVNRT.

"AV nodal" reentry: Part II: AV nodal, AV junctional, or atrionodal reentry?

The classical model of "atrioventricular (AV) nodal" reentrant tachycardia suggests that the reentrant circuit is entirely within the compact AV node and that AV nodal tissue is present proximal and distal to the circuit. Recent evidence from mapping studies and from examination of the effects of curative procedures, however, suggests that the upper end of the circuit uses perinodal atrial or transitional tissue. Moreover, the anatomical substrate of dual "AV nodal" pathways is likely to be the multiple connections between compact AV node and atrium rather than discrete intranodal pathways. The antegrade slow pathway appears to be situated at the posteroinferior approaches to the AV node in the region between the coronary sinus orifice and the tricuspid annulus. The retrograde fast pathway appears to be situated in the anterior atrionodal connections at the apex of Koch's triangle, close to the His bundle. The lower turnaround point of the circuit is likely to be within the AV node.

Electrophysiology and long-term efficacy of pentisomide in patients with supraventricular tachycardia

The electrophysiologic effects of pentisomide were investigated after intravenous (5 mg/kg) and oral (900-1200 mg three times a day) application in 9 patients with drug refractory atrioventricular nodal tachycardia and 6 patients with orthodromic atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia. Pentisomide did not change sinus cycle length, effective refractory period of the right ventricle and the atrioventricular node. AH, HV interval, effective refractory period of the right atrium, QRS duration and QTc duration were (p less than or equal to 0.01) increased. Tachycardia cycle length was only increased after intravenous application of pentisomide, antegrade effective refractory periods of the accessory pathways and shortest fully pre-excited R-R intervals during atrial fibrillation were increased after the oral treatment phase (p = 0.054). Intravenous pentisomide prevented tachycardia in 6/9 patients with atrioventricular nodal tachycardia and in 2/6 patients with atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia. If intravenous pentisomide did not prevent induction of the tachycardia, oral pentisomide was not effective either. During long-term follow-up 2/7 patients with atrioventricular nodal tachycardia and 1/4 patient with atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia had a recurrence. Long-term treatment with pentisomide had to be discontinued because of possible side effects in 2 patients. It is concluded, that the electrophysiological effects of pentisomide are similar to those of flecainide and propafenone.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral nadolol for supraventricular tachycardia in children

The efficacy and safety of oral nadolol in supraventricular tachycardia were evaluated prospectively in 27 children (median age 5.5 years). Fifteen patients had an unsuccessful trial of digoxin therapy. Intravenous nadolol was given to seven patients during electrophysiologic study; five of these had an excellent response and two had a partial response (25% decrease in tachycardia rate). Six of these patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twelve patients received both propranolol and nadolol. Among six patients, intravenous propranolol was successful in four and unsuccessful in two; all six had a similar response to oral nadolol. With oral propranolol, tachycardia was well controlled in four patients and persistent in two; five of five patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twenty-six patients were treated with oral nadolol; the arrhythmia was well controlled in 23, 2 had recurrent tachycardia and 1 patient had tachycardia at a 25% slower rate. The effective dose of nadolol ranged between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg body weight once daily (median dose 1 mg/kg per day). During follow-up (3 to 36 months), compliance and tolerance were excellent; excluding 2 patients with reactive airway disease who developed wheezing, only 3 (12%) of 24 had side effects necessitating a change in drug therapy. Once a day nadolol is a safe and effective agent in the management of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Its long-term efficacy can be predicted by the short-term response to intravenous nadolol or propranolol during programmed electrophysiologic study.

Two accessory pathways, dual AV nodal conduction, and 1:2 ventriculoatrial conduction in a patient with multiple supraventricular tachycardias

Multiple supraventricular tachycardias were induced in a patient with two left posterior accessory pathways and dual atrioventricular nodal conduction. One of the accessory pathways conducts slowly and exhibits decremental conduction. A "double retrograde response" (2:1 ventriculoatrial conduction) due to simultaneous retrograde propagation of a single ventricular depolarization over two longitudinally dissociated pathways plays a role not only in tachycardia initiation, but in the maintenance of a unique, irregular tachycardia.

Efficacy of nadolol alone or in combination with a type IA antiarrhythmic drug in sustained ventricular tachycardia: a prospective study

We examined the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous nadolol acutely, as well as chronic nadolol alone or combined with a type IA antiarrhythmic drug in 19 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia and heart disease, mean age 62 +/- 15 years, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction 39 +/- 8%. Patients underwent electrophysiological studies in the drug-free state (control), after intravenous nadolol (dose = 0.05 mg/kg), and oral nadolol (dose = 80 mg/day) for 5 days alone or in combination with a type IA antiarrhythmic drug. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiological effects as well as ventricular tachycardia induction at electrophysiological study were analyzed. Long-term therapy with oral nadolol alone or in combination with a type IA antiarrhythmic drug was evaluated in responders. Intravenous nadolol prolonged RR and QRS intervals but had no effect on PR and QTc intervals. Oral nadolol alone tended to prolong RR intervals (P = 0.08). Oral nadolol with type IA antiarrhythmic drug prolonged RR and QTc intervals (P less than 0.001). The mean right ventricular effective refractory period tended to prolong after intravenous nadolol alone (from 251 +/- 29 to 263 +/- 25 msec, P = 0.08). Oral nadolol and type IA antiarrhythmic drugs did not prolong right ventricular effective refractory period (P = 0.3). Eighteen patients had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia at control electrophysiological study. After intravenous nadolol, ventricular tachycardia was no longer inducible in seven patients. Ventricular tachycardia did not recur and remained noninducible in two of six patients who tolerated oral nadolol alone. Mean right ventricular effective refractory period prolonged from baseline values (from 249 +/- 30 to 271 +/- 30 msec, P less than 0.02) in patients who became noninducible on intravenous nadolol. In patients who remained inducible, mean right ventricular effective refractory period remained unchanged (from 253 +/- 29 to 258 +/- 22 msec, P greater than 0.2). In nonresponders to intravenous or oral nadolol, oral nadolol, and type IA antiarrhythmic drug suppressed ventricular tachycardia induction in two of ten patients. During follow-up, three patients continued on oral nadolol alone (one patient) or oral nadolol and type IA antiarrhythmic drug (two patients). Adverse effects resulting in nadolol discontinuation occurred in five patients. Therefore, we concluded that intravenous nadolol is effective in acute suppression of inducible ventricular tachycardia in selected patients. Oral nadolol alone or in combination with type IA antiarrhythmic drug is infrequently effective and poorly tolerated by this patient population. In addition, electrophysiological studies on intravenous nadolol do not predict the outcome of oral nadolol therapy.

Double atrial and double ventricular responses during slow-fast fast-slow atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

A case was described with fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia as related with simultaneous fast and slow pathway conduction both antegrade and retrograde. Fast-slow form of tachycardia was induced by premature right atrial stimulation or incremental right ventricular pacing when the last paced beat conducted to the atria via both fast and slow pathways of the atrioventricular node causing double atrial response. Fast-slow form of tachycardia was spontaneously shifted to slow-fast form when the atrial echo, possibly through the retrograde intermediate pathway, was conducted antegradely over the fast and slow pathways simultaneously, producing double ventricular response.

Effect of flestolol on ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The ultrashort-acting beta blocker flestolol was studied during atrial pacing and atrial fibrillation (AF) in 10 patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Flestolol was given as a 100-micrograms/kg bolus followed by a 10-micrograms/kg/min infusion for 15 minutes. The drug did not alter the antegrade effective refractory period of the accessory pathway or the atrial paced cycle length at which block occurred in the accessory pathway. After flestolol, the percent of preexcited QRS complexes during AF increased (60 +/- 10 vs 87 +/- 5%, p = 0.01). Despite this, the ventricular rate slowed, with increases in mean RR interval (382 +/- 20 vs 416 +/- 22 ms, p = 0.02) and in the shortest interval between preexcited QRS complexes (251 +/- 18 vs 270 +/- 17 ms, p less than 0.01). The effect of isoproterenol 3 to 5 micrograms/min was studied in 5 patients. During atrial pacing, isoproterenol decreased the antegrade refractory period and the atrial paced cycle length of block in the accessory pathway (p less than or equal to 0.05). During AF, it decreased the percent of preexcited QRS complexes, mean RR interval and shortest interval between preexcited QRS complexes (p less than 0.05). Flestolol reversed the effects of isoproterenol both during atrial pacing and AF. Thus, flestolol does not alter conduction over the accessory pathway during atrial pacing, but during AF it slows conduction over the accessory pathway and prevents isoproterenol-mediated increases in ventricular rate. This suggests that in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome sympathetic stimulation after the onset of AF enhances conduction over the accessory pathway and is an important determinant of ventricular rate.

Management of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are common and treatment is based on the frequency and hemodynamic severity caused by these arrhythmias. Empiric therapy with currently available medications often satisfactorily controls symptomatic arrhythmias. Nonpharmocologic therapy with permanent antitachycardia pacemakers, percutaneous catheter ablation or surgery can be effective for selected patients with medically refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after thorough electrophysiologic evaluation. In selected patients with life-threatening supraventricular tachyarrhythmias due to the WPW syndrome, surgical ablation is the therapy of choice.

Electropharmacology of flestolol for supraventricular tachycardia without associated structural heart disease

Flestolol is an ultrashort-acting beta-blocking drug with a half-life of 6.9 minutes. Its antiarrhythmic efficacy was studied in 21 patients with spontaneous and inducible supraventricular tachycardia: atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia in 6 patients and orthodromic AV reciprocating tachycardia in 15. It increased the effective refractory period of the AV node in all patients with AV nodal tachycardia (fast pathway, p less than 0.02; slow pathway, p less than 0.01), but did not alter the anterograde (n = 8) or retrograde (n = 9) refractory periods of accessory pathways. Flestolol prevented initiation of tachycardia by causing block in anterograde AV nodal conduction. It was more effective in patients with AV nodal tachycardia (5 of 6) than in those with AV reciprocating tachycardia (4 of 15, p less than 0.03). In patients in whom it was ineffective, the mean tachycardia cycle length increased by 54 ms because of an increase in AH interval (p less than 0.0001, n = 11). The cycle length of tachycardia induced 30 minutes after infusion was similar to the cycle length in the control state (354 vs 355 ms, n = 16). Flestolol's kinetics permitted clinically indicated electropharmacologic testing of a second antiarrhythmic drug in 8 patients and control of ventricular rate until arrhythmia surgery in 1 patient with incessant tachycardia. No hypotension or toxicity occurred. Our findings indicate that flestolol's principal antiarrhythmic effects are on the AV node, similar to the effects of other beta-blocking drugs. Its ultrashort duration of action is an advantage during electropharmacologic testing.

Efficacy and safety of oral nadolol for exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias

Sixty-four patients with reproducible exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of oral nadolol therapy. There were 53 men and 11 women ranging in age from 19 to 75 years (mean 53.9). The severity of arrhythmias varied from frequent ventricular premature beats to nonsustained and sustained ventricular tachycardias. Using serial treadmill exercise tests, patients underwent dose titration for 1 month and were followed up for 3 to 6 months. Depending on drug tolerance and response to treadmill exercise testing, the single daily required dose of oral nadolol ranged from 20 to 240 mg (average 66). Twenty-three (36%) of the patients experienced a total of 30 adverse effects of nadolol therapy; however, only 9 (14%) patients had to be withdrawn from the study. The adverse effects observed were those commonly associated with beta-adrenergic blocking agents, and all were dose-dependent and reversible. At the last patient visit, the severity of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias was significantly decreased compared with pretreatment in 36 (75%) of 48 evaluable patients. Eighteen (38%) of the patients demonstrated total suppression of arrhythmias. This was accompanied by significant increases from pretreatment in both the mean duration of symptom-limited exercise (+1.02 +/- 0.41 minutes, p less than 0.05) and the mean time of exercise required for arrhythmia induction (+1.80 +/- 0.66 minutes, p less than 0.01), a significant decrease from pretreatment in the mean peak exercise double-product (-4,775, p less than 0.001) and a decrease in the incidence of exercise-induced ST-segment depression (-33%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Beta-blocker therapy for the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

Two types of arrhythmias are associated with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: those in which the accessory pathway is a required part of the reentrant circuit, e.g., orthodromic atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia, and those that conduct over the accessory pathway but do not require its activation for maintenance of tachycardia, e.g., atrial flutter/fibrillation. Increased sympathetic tone shortens the refractoriness of atrial and ventricular tissue; however, conduction in the atrium and ventricle is not considered the limiting factor for maintenance of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia or conduction over the accessory pathway in atrial arrhythmias. Intravenous beta-adrenergic blockers given to patients in the resting state have a minimal to moderate effect in depressing atrioventricular nodal conduction, but have little or no effect on accessory pathway refractoriness or conduction in most patients. In patients presenting with atrioventricular reentry, intravenous administration of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs often is not effective to terminate tachycardia. However, long-term oral therapy with these agents may be beneficial, especially in patients in whom enhanced sympathetic tone is responsible for the initiation or maintenance of tachycardia.

Electrophysiology of beta blockers in supraventricular arrhythmias

beta-adrenergic blocking agents are efficacious in the treatment of patients with a variety of supraventricular tachycardias, based directly on their capacity to counter the effects of beta-adrenergic stimulation on sinus and atrioventricular nodal tissue. Specifically, beta blockers depress sinus node automaticity and inhibit atrioventricular nodal function by prolonging refractoriness and slowing conduction. Supraventricular arrhythmias that depend on these structures either for perpetuation or for conduction to the ventricles are predictably sensitive to beta blockade. These arrhythmias include sinus tachycardia, sinoatrial reentrant, atrioventricular nodal reentrant (dual pathway) and atrioventricular reciprocating (concealed bypass tract) tachycardias, as well as atrial flutter and fibrillation. beta blockers may also be used, in selected patients, to inhibit catecholamine-facilitated accessory pathway function by prolonging refractoriness. beta blockers offer particular clinical advantages, including an acceptable side-effect profile, titratable effect, varied pharmacology and reasonable concordance between efficacy of parenteral and oral dosage forms. The key element in the most effective use of these drugs appears to be an accurate arrhythmia diagnosis that allows for the most appropriate application of a reliable treatment form.

Long-term efficacy and safety of beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists for supraventricular tachycardia

The efficacy and safety of nadolol and atenolol, 2 new long-acting beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, were evaluated in patients with recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Intravenous and oral drug therapy was administered to patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Efficacy was judged on a short-term basis by programmed electrical stimulation and on a long-term basis by clinical parameters and serial ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings during long-term follow-up. In addition, the usefulness of programmed electrical stimulation to predict long-term efficacy was evaluated. Intravenous nadolol prevented induction of SVT in 6 of 8 (75%) patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and oral nadolol prevented induction of SVT in 5 of 6 (83%) responders to intravenous nadolol. No episodes of sustained SVT recurred in these 5 patients during follow-up. Intravenous nadolol also prevented induction of SVT in 2 of 17 (11%) patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Both patients remained non-inducible during treatment with oral nadolol, and neither experienced recurrence of SVT during follow-up. Intravenous atenolol prevented induction of SVT in 5 of 6 (83%) patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Oral atenolol prevented induction of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in 4 of 5 (80%) patients responding to intravenous atenolol, and none of these 4 patients experienced a clinical recurrence. Intravenous atenolol prevented induction of SVT in 1 of 4 (25%) patients with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia. Oral atenolol prevented induction of SVT in this patient and the arrhythmia has not recurred during follow-up. During follow-up (1 to 37 months), drug tolerance and compliance have been excellent with a low incidence of adverse reactions (11%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of intravenous nadolol for supraventricular tachycardia

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel trial of intravenous nadolol in the treatment of sustained supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), 29 patients (20 men, 9 women) were studied. Mean age was 55 years and all patients were required to have well-documented SVT with a ventricular rate greater than or equal to 120/min that was sustained for at least 30 minutes. Patients received sequential doses of 0.01, 0.02 and 0.04 mg/kg of nadolol or placebo at 10 minute intervals. The maximum total dosage of nadolol was 10 mg. Measurements taken during 10 minute monitoring periods after each administration included heart rate, ventricular rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. A positive response was defined as a greater than or equal to 20% decrease in heart rate, heart rate less than or equal to 100 beats/min or conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Eleven (79%) of patients given nadolol and 3 (20%) of placebo-treated patients demonstrated a positive response. Of the 11 responders to nadolol, 9 patients responded after the first dose, one after the second dose and one after the third dose. Significant (p less than 0.001) mean reductions in heart rate and ventricular rate were observed with nadolol, but not with placebo. Five (36%) of the patients given nadolol and only 2 (14%) of the patients who received placebo were converted to normal sinus rhythm. Adverse effects were limited to 1 episode of asymptomatic hypotension and 1 episode of wheezing with nadolol and 1 episode of asymptomatic hypotension with placebo. Nadolol is effective in controlling ventricular response in patients with sustained SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrophysiologic effects, clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral nadolol in refractory supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

The electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic effects, clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral nadolol therapy were examined in 34 patients with recurrent supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) undergoing electrophysiologic evaluation. Programmed electrical stimulation was performed in the control (drug-free) state, after infusion of intravenous nadolol (mean dose 0.09 +/- 0.03 mg/kg) and after chronic oral nadolol therapy in patients who responded to intravenous nadolol (mean dose 83 +/- 12 mg for 5 days). Intravenous nadolol administration prolonged mean sinus cycle length (p = 0.009), mean PR interval (p = 0.001) and mean AH interval (p = 0.001), with no significant electrophysiologic effects in the atrium, ventricle or accessory bypass tracts. Oral nadolol had similar electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic effects, but of lesser magnitude. Intravenous nadolol resulted in complete suppression of induced SVT in 78% of patients with sinus and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and 11% of patients with atrioventricular (AV) reentrant tachycardia (p less than 0.001). Partial responses were frequent in intraatrial or AV reentrant tachycardia (37%). Oral nadolol suppressed induction of SVT in patients who responded to intravenous nadolol. Adverse reactions to intravenous and oral nadolol were infrequent--6% and 8%, respectively--and usually did not require drug withdrawal. Intravenous nadolol is highly effective in sinus and AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, and a successful electrophysiologic response to it predicts efficacy of long-term oral nadolol therapy. It has limited efficacy alone in AV reentrant tachycardia and should be considered in combination with other antiarrhythmic therapy in this type of SVT.

Tachyarrhythmias. Application of new information to clinical management

Currently used approaches to the management of recurrent tachycardias are defined by an understanding of the significance of the clinical presentation and the limitations of presently available laboratory methods. Selection of the appropriate laboratory technique is important and has to be based on an understanding of the goals of antiarrhythmic therapy. A systematic approach to the selection of antiarrhythmic therapy has now been developed. In selected subgroups of patients, no antiarrhythmic therapy is indicated; however, in high-risk and severely symptomatic patients, aggressive laboratory investigation utilizing electrophysiologic techniques is clearly warranted and should be employed.

Beta-adrenoceptor blockade: electrophysiology and antiarrhythmic mechanisms

Beta-adrenoceptor-blocking agents reduce beta-adrenergic activity and depress sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodal conduction. These agents are thus useful for controlling supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. For the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, beta-adrenoceptor-blocking agents possess antifibrillatory properties, depress diastolic depolarization of ectopic pacemaker activity, reduce electrical instability associated with prolongation of the QT interval, and are specifically effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias that are rate (tachycardia) dependent and/or caused by catecholamine-sensitive automaticity. Furthermore, beneficial hemodynamic effects of beta-adrenoceptor blockade on ischemic myocardium may also contribute to the antiarrhythmic potency of these agents.