Enhancement of salvage of reperfused myocardium by early beta-adrenergic blockade (timolol)

Efficacy of a Novel Mitochondrial-Derived Peptide in a Porcine Model of Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

•

A mitochondrial-derived peptide therapy, HNG, was safe and was delivered as adjunctive therapy with standard-of-care reperfusion in a translational large animal model of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

•

HNG reduced infarct size per area-at-risk by 41% with an ischemic time of 60 min followed by 48 h of reperfusion.

•

The infarct-sparing effects of HNG were abolished when the ischemic time was increased to 75 min followed by 48 h of reperfusion.

•

The use of rigorous translational large animal models that account for clinically relevant variables is a prerequisite to better predict the clinical efficacy and outcomes of novel therapeutic strategies.

With the complexities that surround myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (MI/R) injury, therapies adjunctive to reperfusion that elicit beneficial pleiotropic effects and do not overlap with standard of care are necessary. This study found that the mitochondrial-derived peptide S14G-humanin (HNG) (2 mg/kg), an analogue of humanin, reduced infarct size in a large animal model of MI/R. However, when ischemic time was increased, the infarct-sparing effects were abolished with the same dose of HNG. Thus, although the 60-min MI/R study showed that HNG cardioprotection translates beyond small animal models, further studies are needed to optimize HNG therapy for longer, more patient-relevant periods of cardiac ischemia.

Early Intravenous Beta-Blockers in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Before Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

The impact of intravenous (IV) beta-blockers before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) on infarct size and clinical outcomes is not well established.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to conduct the first double-blind, placebo-controlled international multicenter study testing the effect of early IV beta-blockers before PPCI in a general ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population.

METHODS

STEMI patients presenting <12 h from symptom onset in Killip class I to II without atrioventricular block were randomized 1:1 to IV metoprolol (2 × 5-mg bolus) or matched placebo before PPCI. Primary endpoint was myocardial infarct size as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 30 days. Secondary endpoints were enzymatic infarct size and incidence of ventricular arrhythmias. Safety endpoints included symptomatic bradycardia, symptomatic hypotension, and cardiogenic shock.

RESULTS

A total of 683 patients (mean age 62 ± 12 years; 75% male) were randomized to metoprolol (n = 336) or placebo (n = 346). CMR was performed in 342 patients (54.8%). Infarct size (percent of left ventricle [LV]) by CMR did not differ between the metoprolol (15.3 ± 11.0%) and placebo groups (14.9 ± 11.5%; p = 0.616). Peak and area under the creatine kinase curve did not differ between both groups. LV ejection fraction by CMR was 51.0 ± 10.9% in the metoprolol group and 51.6 ± 10.8% in the placebo group (p = 0.68). The incidence of malignant arrhythmias was 3.6% in the metoprolol group versus 6.9% in placebo (p = 0.050). The incidence of adverse events was not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a nonrestricted STEMI population, early intravenous metoprolol before PPCI was not associated with a reduction in infarct size. Metoprolol reduced the incidence of malignant arrhythmias in the acute phase and was not associated with an increase in adverse events. (Early-Beta blocker Administration before reperfusion primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction [EARLY-BAMI]; EudraCT no: 2010-023394-19).

Approaches to Improving Cardiac Structure and Function During and After an Acute Myocardial Infarction: Acute and Chronic Phases

While progress has been made in improving survival following myocardial infarction, this injury remains a major source of mortality and morbidity despite modern reperfusion therapy. While one approach has been to develop therapies to reduce lethal myocardial cell reperfusion injury, this concept has not translated to the clinics, and several recent negative clinical trials raise the question of whether reperfusion injury is important in humans undergoing reperfusion for acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Therapy aimed at reducing myocardial cell death while the myocytes are still ischemic is more likely to further reduce myocardial infarct size. Developing new therapies to further reduce left ventricular remodeling after the acute event is another approach to preserving structure and function of the heart after infarction. Such therapy may include chronic administration of pharmacologic agents and/or therapies developed from the field of regenerative cardiology, including cellular or non-cellular materials such as extracellular matrix. The optimal therapy will be to administer agents that both reduce myocardial infarct size in the acute phase of infarction as well as reduce adverse left ventricular remodeling during the chronic or healing phase of myocardial infarction. Such a dual approach will help optimize the preservation of both cardiac structure and function.

Rationale and design of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of early administration of intravenous β-blockers in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: EARLY β-blocker administration before primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial

BACKGROUND

β-Blockers have a class 1a recommendation in the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), as they are associated with a reduced mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmias, and with prevention of unfavorable left ventricular remodeling. Whether early administration before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of intravenous β-blockers reduces the infarct size in the current era is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulate that the early administration of β-blockers will reduce the myocardial infarcted area as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 30 days.

DESIGN

In a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, patients with symptoms and signs of STEMI and transferred to a hospital for primary PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intravenous metoprolol (5 mg twice daily) administration or placebo. Before admission, study treatment will be started as soon as possible after the diagnosis of STEMI. After admission, primary PCI will be performed as per standard of care. After primary PCI, medical treatment will occur as per current guidelines in all patients, including the use of oral β-blockers. The primary end point is the myocardial infarct size as assessed by MRI at 30 days. Based on a superiority design and assuming an 18% relative infarct size reduction (from 28% to 23.5%), 408 patients are required to be enrolled, accounting for 20% drop-out (α = .05 and power = 80%).

SUMMARY

The EARLY-BAMI trial is a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial that will investigate the impact of intravenous metoprolol administration before primary PCI for STEMI on myocardial infarct size as measured with MRI at 30 days.

Intracoronary followed by intravenous administration of the short-acting β-blocker landiolol prevents myocardial injury in the face of elective percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with higher subsequent cardiac events and mortality. β-Blockers have been used to reduce myocardial injury during ischemia and reperfusion. We investigated whether intracoronary followed by intravenous administration of the short-acting β-blocker landiolol prevents myocardial injury in the face of elective PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing elective PCI (n=70) were randomly assigned to the landiolol (n=35) or control (n=35) group. Landiolol or saline was administered into target vessels through a balloon catheter for 1min before and after first balloon inflation followed by continuous intravenous administration for 6h after PCI. The incidence of myocardial injury defined by cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) >/=0.05 ng/ml was 79% of the patients in the control group compared to 56% in the landiolol group (p=0.04). The cTnI level at 24h after PCI tended to be lower in the landiolol group (0.57 ± 1.14 versus 1.27 ± 2.48 ng/ml; p=0.07), while the CK-MB level was not significantly different between the landiolol and control groups. The incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction defined by cTnI >/=0.12 ng/ml was significantly (p=0.02) lower in the landiolol group (41%) compared to the control group (70%). There was no incidence of coronary spasm, hypotension, bradycardia or heart failure during and after PCI in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Brief intracoronary followed by continuous intravenous administration of landiolol is safe and effective for myocardial protection in the face of elective PCI.

Lethal myocardial reperfusion injury: a necessary evil?

Despite being the most effective means of limiting infarct size, coronary reperfusion comes at a price and induces additional damage to the myocardium. Lethal reperfusion injury (death of myocytes that were viable at the time of reperfusion) is an increasingly acknowledged phenomenon. There are many interconnected mechanisms involved in this type of cell death. Calcium overload (generating myocyte hypercontracture), rapid recovery of physiological pH, neutrophil infiltration of the ischemic area, opening of the mitochondrial permeability-transition-pore (PTP), and apoptotic cell death are among the more important mechanisms involved in reperfusion injury. The activation of a group of proteins called reperfusion injury salvage kinases (RISK) pathway confers protection against reperfusion injury, mainly by inhibiting the opening of the mitochondrial PTP. Many interventions have been tested in human trials triggered by encouraging animal studies. In the present review we will explain in detail the main mechanism involved in reperfusion injury, as well as the various approaches (pre-clinical and human trials) performed targeting these mechanisms. Currently, no intervention has been consistently shown to reduce reperfusion injury in large randomized multicenter trials, but the research in this field is intense and the future is highly promising.

Adjunctive therapy after reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction

The current era has witnessed dramatic improvement in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, due in large part to the more widespread use of thrombolytic therapy aimed at quickly restoring perfusion in the infarct-related artery. This review addresses the role of adjunctive pharmacologic therapy in the thrombolytic era, recognizing that much of the available clinical trial data supporting the role of adjunctive pharmacologic treatment strategies was conducted in patient populations not widely exposed to reperfusion therapy. This review, therefore, explores the data supporting the incremental benefit of therapy with beta blockers, nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or magnesium in addition to thrombolytic therapy. Heparin and aspirin will not be discussed.

Early metoprolol administration before coronary reperfusion results in increased myocardial salvage: analysis of ischemic myocardium at risk using cardiac magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers improve clinical outcome when administered early after acute myocardial infarction. However, whether beta-blockers actually reduce the myocardial infarction size is still in dispute. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can accurately depict the left ventricular (LV) ischemic myocardium at risk (T2-weighted hyperintense region) early after myocardial infarction, as well as the extent of necrosis (delayed gadolinium enhancement). The aim of this study was to determine whether early administration of metoprolol could increase myocardial salvage, measured as the difference between the extent of myocardium at risk and myocardial necrosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve Yorkshire pigs underwent a 90-minute left anterior descending coronary occlusion, followed by reperfusion. They were randomized to metoprolol (7.5 mg during myocardial infarction) or placebo. Global and regional LV function, extent of myocardium at risk, and myocardial necrosis were quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies performed 4 and 22 days after reperfusion in 10 survivors. Despite similar extent of myocardium at risk in metoprolol- and placebo-treated pigs (30.9% of LV versus 30.6%; P=NS), metoprolol resulted in 5-fold-larger salvaged myocardium (32.4% versus 6.2% of myocardium at risk; P=0.015). The LV ejection fraction significantly improved in metoprolol-treated pigs between days 4 and 22 (37.2% versus 43.0%; P=0.037), whereas it remained unchanged in pigs treated with placebo (35.1% versus 35.0%; P=NS). The extent of myocardial salvage was related directly to LV ejection fraction improvement (P=0.031) and regional LV wall motion recovery (P=0.039) at day 22.

CONCLUSIONS

Early metoprolol administration during acute coronary occlusion increases myocardial salvage. The extent of myocardial salvage, measured as the difference between myocardium at risk and myocardial necrosis, was associated with regional and global LV motion improvement.

Ability of mechanical reperfusion to salvage myocardium in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting beyond 12 hours after onset of symptoms

BACKGROUND

The ability of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to salvage myocardium in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting >12 hours after symptom onset is questionable. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of primary PCI to salvage myocardium in patients with STEMI presenting between 12 and 48 hours after the symptom onset.

METHODS

In the BRAVE-2 trial, 365 patients with acute STEMI presenting between 12 and 48 hours from the symptom onset were randomized to an invasive (PCI) or a conservative treatment strategy. Two-hundred sixty-one patients enrolled in 2 centers had scintigraphy before randomization and 5 to 10 days later and constitute the cohort of the present study. Salvage index (proportion of initial perfusion defect salvaged) was the primary end point of this study.

RESULTS

There were 131 patients randomly assigned to the invasive treatment and 130 patients assigned to the conservative treatment. Initial perfusion defect (median [25th-75th percentiles]) did not differ between groups (17.0% [9.0-28.5] vs 16.0% [9.0-37.5] of the left ventricle; P = .99). The final infarct size, measured in the follow-up scintigraphy, was significantly smaller in patients assigned to the invasive treatment than in those assigned to the conservative treatment (8.0% [2.0-16.0] vs 12.0% [3.2-25.0] of the left ventricle; P = .004). Salvage index was 0.44 (0.13-0.80) in the invasive group versus 0.23 (0.0-0.50) in the conservative group (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Primary PCI leads to significant myocardial salvage in patients with STEMI presenting between 12 and 48 hours after symptom onset.

Cardiac protection during acute myocardial infarction: Where do we stand in 2004?

Despite better outcomes with early coronary artery reperfusion for the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), morbidity and mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain significant, the incidence of congestive heart failure continues to increase, and there is a need to provide better cardioprotection (therapy that reduces the amount of necrosis that may be coupled with better clinical outcome) in the setting of AMI. Since the introduction of the concept of cardiac protection over a quarter of a century ago, various interventions have been investigated to reduce myocardial infarct size. Intravenous beta-blockers administered in the early hours of infarction were clearly shown to be of benefit. Intravenous adenosine appeared promising for anterior wall AMIs, as did cariporide in some studies. Glucose-insulin-potassium infusion was beneficial in certain subgroups of patients, particularly diabetics. A variety of other medications were studied with negative or marginal results. The best strategy to limit infarct size is early reperfusion with percutaneous coronary stenting or thrombolytic therapy. Stenting is superior and should be adopted whenever there is a qualified laboratory available. Available resources should focus on decreasing time from onset of symptoms to start of reperfusion and maintaining vessel patency. Future studies powered to better assess clinical outcome are needed for adjunctive therapy with adenosine, K(ATP) channel openers, Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibitors, and hypothermia.

Impact of intravenous Beta-Blockade before primary angioplasty on survival in patients undergoing mechanical reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the effect of intravenous beta-blockers administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on survival and myocardial recovery after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Studies of primary PCI but not thrombolysis have suggested that beta-blocker administration before reperfusion may enhance survival. Whether oral beta-blocker use before admission modulates this effect is unknown.

METHODS

The Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) trial randomized 2082 AMI patients to either stenting or balloon angioplasty, each +/- abciximab. In accordance with the protocol, intravenous beta-blockers were administered before PCI in the absence of contraindications.

RESULTS

A total of 1136 patients (54.5%, BB+ group) received beta-blockers before PCI, whereas 946 (45.5%, BB- group) did not. The 30-day mortality was significantly lower in the BB+ group than in the BB- group (1.5% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.03), an effect entirely limited to patients who had not been receiving beta-blockers before admission (1.2% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.007). In contrast, no survival benefit with pre-procedural beta-blockers was observed in patients receiving beta-blockers at home (3.3% vs. 1.9%, respectively, p = 0.47). By multivariate analysis, pre-procedural beta-blocker use was an independent predictor of lower 30-day mortality among patients without previous beta-blocker therapy (relative risk = 0.38 [95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.87], p = 0.02). The improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction from baseline to seven months was also greater after intravenous beta-blockers (3.8% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.01), an effect limited to patients not receiving oral beta-blockers before admission.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI, myocardial recovery is enhanced and 30-day mortality is reduced with pre-procedural intravenous beta-blockade, effects confined to patients untreated with oral beta-blocker medication before admission.

Effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition on microvascular flow after coronary reperfusion. A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition (GPI) on microvascular flow after coronary occlusion/reperfusion using quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography (QMCE).

BACKGROUND

Platelets may play a major role in the dissociation of epicardial artery recanalization and tissue-level reperfusion, referred to as the "no-reflow phenomenon." Therefore, GPI might improve myocardial reperfusion, distinct from its effects on epicardial patency.T METHOD: hree-hour occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was followed by 3-h reperfusion in 16 open-chest dogs: 8 controls and 8 given a continuous infusion of the GPI tirofiban, starting 45 min before LAD reopening. Perfusion of the LAD bed was quantified by the rate of intensity rise (b) by QMCE; myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed by fluorescent microspheres.

RESULTS

No differences in b or MBF were observed within the risk area between the control and GPI groups at baseline or occlusion. However, b and MBF were higher in GPI dogs than in controls during reperfusion, despite similar epicardial flow (p < 0.05 at 30, 60, and 90 min; p = NS at 180 min). Infarct area size was significantly reduced in GPI dogs compared with non-treated dogs (26.9 +/- 10.5% vs. 49.0 +/- 11.1% of at-risk area, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

As demonstrated by QMCE, GPI improves microvascular flow and reduces the infarct area after coronary occlusion/reperfusion, independent of epicardial flow. These data demonstrate the usefulness of QMCE in assessing microvascular flow, provide novel evidence for the role of platelets in the early phase of reperfusion injury, and show that GPI is of value in preserving microvascular perfusion after coronary reperfusion.

Effects of prior beta-blocker therapy on clinical outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction

We hypothesized that pretreatment with beta blockers may improve clinical outcomes after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. We pooled clinical, angiographic, and outcomes data on 2,537 patients enrolled in the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI), PAMI-2, and Stent PAMI trials. We classified patients into a beta group (n = 1,132) if they received beta-blocker therapy before primary angioplasty or a no-beta group (n = 1,405) if they did not. We evaluated procedural complications and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes (death and major adverse cardiac events [death, reinfarction, target vessel revascularization, or stroke]) between groups. Beta patients were younger, had higher systolic blood pressure and heart rate, and were more likely to be in Killip class I at admission. They had lower left ventricular ejection fraction, greater door-to-balloon time, greater likelihood of having a left anterior descending artery culprit lesion, but a similar incidence of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 3 flow after angioplasty (92.6% vs 92.7%, p = 0.91). The beta group had less procedural complications (23% vs 34%, p <0.0001) and a lower incidence of death (1.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.0035) and major adverse cardiac events (5.5% vs 7.8%, p = 0.027) during hospitalization. At 1 year, mortality remained lower in beta patients (4.9% vs 6.7%, log-rank p = 0.055). After adjustment for baseline differences, beta patients had significantly lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.41; 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.84; p <0.0148) and nonsignificantly lower 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.08; p = 0.11). Thus, pretreatment with beta blockers has an independent beneficial effect on short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

Adenosine for myocardial protection in acute myocardial infarction

Although reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction is known to reduce infarct size, improve left ventricular function, and reduce mortality, the full potential benefit may be limited by acceleration of damage resulting from reperfusion, or "reperfusion injury." Evidence of a variety of mechanisms of reperfusion injury has led to a wide range of proposed therapeutic interventions, including agents to prevent oxygen free radical damage, inhibit white blood cell function, reduce calcium influx, improve microvascular blood flow, inhibit sympathetic stimulation, and improve energy stores. A multitude of agents have been shown to limit infarct size in animals when administered before or during reperfusion. Unfortunately, most have been disappointing when tested clinically. Adenosine, a theoretically attractive agent for preventing reperfusion injury, has shown promise in small, clinical studies, and appears to be an endogenous substance involved in the protective effect of ischemic preconditioning. When studied in the setting of angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction, adenosine was associated with small infarct size and improved coronary flow. As myocardial preservation with reperfusion during bypass surgery shares pathophysiologic characteristics with the reperfused myocardium in acute infarction, early results of adenosine during bypass surgery presented at this symposium support the concept that adenosine may be beneficial. Two ongoing Phase II trials of adenosine in acute myocardial infarction-one with thrombolysis and one with direct angioplasty-will provide important information about the potential benefits of adenosine in the context of reperfusion.

Failure of intravenous metoprolol to limit acute myocardial infarct size in a nonreperfused porcine model

The usefulness of intravenous beta-adrenergic receptor blockade in limiting infarct size when neither reperfusion nor collateral flow occurs is unknown. The effect of intravenous metoprolol on limiting myocardial infarct size was therefore examined in a nonreperfused porcine model. Closed-chest techniques were used to occlude the left anterior descending coronary artery, after which animals were randomized at 20 minutes to receive intravenous metoprolol, 0.75 mg/kg, or placebo. Infarct size examined at 5 hours with Evans blue and triphenyltetrazolium staining techniques was expressed as a percentage of total ventricular myocardium at ischemic risk. This percentage was not significantly different between the groups (84% +/- 5% with metoprolol vs 90% +/- 4% with placebo; p = 0.4). Myocardial infarct size was not significantly decreased at 5 hours by early administration of intravenous metoprolol when the infarct artery remained occluded and collateral flow was minimal.

Effects of oral pretreatment with metoprolol on left ventricular wall motion, infarct size, hemodynamics, and regional myocardial blood flow in anesthetized dogs during thrombotic coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion

OBJECTIVES

To study the effects of oral pretreatment with metoprolol over 3 days on hemodynamics, left ventricular function, regional myocardial blood flow, and infarct size in an anesthetized dog model of thrombotic occlusion of the anterior descending coronary artery treated with thrombolysis.

METHODS

Ten dogs received 200 mg metoprolol (Selozok) orally and 8 dogs received placebo for 3 days twice daily and 1 hour before the experiment. Under general anesthesia, thrombotic occlusion was provoked by the copper-coil technique. Intracardiac pressures and their derivatives, cardiac output (thermodilution method), regional coronary blood flow (microspheres), global and regional left ventricular function (ventriculography), and infarct size (triphenyltetrazolium staining) were measured. Measurements were performed during control, after 60 minutes of occlusion, and after 30 and 90 minutes of reperfusion. Thrombolysis was performed in all dogs 60 minutes after occlusion by intravenous infusion of 10 micrograms/kg/min of rt-PA for 30 minutes.

RESULTS

During control cardiac output was lower, total peripheral resistance higher, and Tau and the left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time greater in the metoprolol group. During occlusion and after reperfusion, there were no significant hemodynamic differences between both groups. Blood flow to the area at risk and circumflex territory during occlusion were, respectively, 12.8 +/- 5.80 ml/100 g/min versus 9.65 +/- 8.35 ml/100 g/min (p > 0.05) and 42.58 +/- 7.86 ml/100 g/min versus 61.52 +/- 20.43 ml/100 g/min (p = 0.01) in the metoprolol- and placebo-treated dogs. The ratios of flow area at risk/circumflex territories in the epicardial, midmyocardial, and endocardial layers were, respectively, 0.44 +/- 0.20, 0.19 +/- 0.09, and 0.20 +/- 0.13 in the metoprolol- versus 0.24 +/- 0.16, 0.08 +/- 0.06, and 0.06 +/- 0.07 (p > or = 0.04) in the placebo-treated dogs. The ratio of flow endocardium/epicardium was higher (p > or = 0.02) in the active treatment group during the control period, both in the area at risk and circumflex territory; this was also the case in the circumflex territory at the end of the experiment (p = 0.003). Thirty minutes after occlusion, blood flow to the three layers of the area at risk rose to 2-3 times control values in both groups; a significant increase above control values also occurred in the circumflex territory. After 90 minutes reperfusion, blood flow to both territories was similar in both groups but was comparable to the control; however, in necrotic tissue of the subendocardial layer of both groups, flow fell below control values (p < 0.05). End-systolic volume rose from 21.2 +/- 7.4 ml to 36.1 +/- 11.5 ml (p < 0.05), end-diastolic volume remained constant (46.0 +/- 13.8 vs. 47.9 +/- 12.1 ml; p > 0.05), and ejection fraction fell from 53.9 +/- 8.3% to 25.8 +/- 10.2% (p < 0.05) at the end of the experiment in the metoprolol group. Respective figures for the placebo group were 19.4 +/- 7.9 versus 27.9 +/- 10.9 (p < 0.05), 38.5 +/- 13.0 versus 42.1 +/- 11.0 (p > 0.05), and 50.6 +/- 5.7 versus 35.5 +/- 11.7 (p < 0.05). Fractional shortening of the chords analyzed was similar in both groups during the control period; it fell significantly at the end of the experiment in three chords of the metoprolol group and in five chords of the placebo group. The apical chord in the placebo, but not in the metoprolol, dogs was dyskinetic: fractional shortening was -0.86 +/- 9.7 versus 7.5 +/- 13.5% (p > 0.05). The area at risk was 41.6 +/- 10.6 cm2 in metoprolol- and 40.5 +/- 7.2 cm2 in placebo-treated dogs (p > 0.05); the infarct size, expressed as a percentage of the area at risk, was 29.0 +/- 22.5% and 45.3 +/- 23.6% (p = 0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral pretreatment with metoprolol limited infarct size and improved regional left ventricular function, probably due to its negative chronotropic and inotropic effects, and also due to an enhancement of collateral flow fr

Early intravenous administration of metoprolol enhances myocardial salvage by thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator after thrombotic coronary artery occlusion in the dog by improvement of the collateral blood flow to the area at risk

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effects of beta 1-adrenergic blockade preceding thrombolysis on hemodynamic variables, myocardial blood flow and infarct size in a canine model of thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

BACKGROUND

Previous work suggested a reduction in infarct size and improvement in left ventricular function by intravenous beta-blockade preceding thrombolysis.

METHODS

Experiments were conducted in 34 anesthetized dogs; 17 received 0.975 mg/kg body weight of metoprolol intravenously starting 15 min after occlusion, and thrombolysis was initiated 60 min after occlusion. Seventeen dogs received saline solution followed by thrombolysis. Coronary blood flow was measured by radioactive microspheres, infarct size by a dye method, hemodynamic variables by catheter-tipped pressure transducers and cardiac output by the thermodilution method.

RESULTS

Infarct size in metoprolol- and placebo-treated dogs was 23.62 +/- 18.04% and 41.50 +/- 16.03% of area at risk, respectively (p < 0.01). Before occlusion, myocardial blood flow and hemodynamic variables were similar. Sixty minutes after occlusion, cardiac output (1.94 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.32 +/- 0.68 liters/min, p < 0.01) was lower in the metoprolol-treated dogs. Collateral flow to the area at risk (17.27 +/- 7.44 vs. 10.25 +/- 5.33) and to its epicardial (21.68 +/- 8.04 vs. 11.5 +/- 6.10), midmyocardial (14.30 +/- 8.63 vs. 7.35 +/- 4.94) and endocardial (13.18 +/- 8.21 vs. 6.26 +/- 5.34 cm3/min per 100 g) layers was higher (p < or = 0.05) in the metoprolol-treated dogs. The ratio of epicardial flow area at risk/circumflex territory was inversely correlated to infarct size (r = -0.69, p < 0.01). After 5 min of occlusion, collateral flow was comparable in the five dogs of each group; over the next 55 min it remained constant in the metoprolol group but decreased in the placebo dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous metoprolol, administered before thrombolysis, enhances infarct size limitation, partly by improvement of collateral flow to area at risk.

Beta-adrenergic blockade following thrombolytic therapy: is it helpful or harmful?

Beta-adrenergic blockade has been a mainstay in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction for nearly two decades. Clearly, it has withstood the test of time. The emergence of thrombolytic therapy, however, has shifted the medical community's focus, raising questions as to the benefit of beta-adrenergic blockade. Although further investigation is warranted, the available evidence suggests that beta blockers can be given safely to selected patients following coronary thrombolysis, particularly in the absence of moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction.

Short-term effects of early intravenous treatment with a beta-adrenergic blocking agent or a specific bradycardiac agent in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to explore mechanisms that could explain the possible clinical benefit of early administration of a beta 1-selective adrenoreceptor blocking agent or a bradycardiac drug as adjunct to thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

The effects of beta-blockers given concomitantly with thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction have not been fully examined. The potential role of specific bradycardiac agents lacking negative inotropism as an alternative to beta-blockers in this setting has never been studied in humans.

METHODS

In a double-blind study, we examined the effects of early intravenous and continued oral administration of a beta-blocker (atenolol), a specific bradycardiac agent (alinidine) or placebo on left ventricular function, late coronary artery patency, infarct size, exercise capacity and incidence of arrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients with acute myocardial infarction of < or = 5 h duration and without contraindications to thrombolytic or beta-blocker therapy were studied. Of these, 100 were allocated to treatment with atenolol (5 to 10 mg intravenously followed by 25 to 50 mg orally every 12 h), 98 to alinidine (20 to 40 mg intravenously followed by 20 to 40 mg orally every 8 h) and 94 to placebo. All patients received 100 mg of alteplase over 3 h and full intravenous heparinization. No significant differences in coronary artery patency, global ejection fraction or regional wall motion were observed at 10 to 14 days among the three groups. Likewise, enzymatic and scintigraphic infarct size were also very similar. Neither atenolol nor alinidine was associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of arrhythmias during the 1st 24 h. No significant differences in clinical events were observed, with the exception of a greater incidence of nonfatal pulmonary edema in the atenolol group (6% vs. 1% in the alinidine group and 0% in the placebo group, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of contraindications, the administration of a beta-blocker or a specific bradycardiac agent together with thrombolytic therapy was safe. In this limited number of patients, these agents did not appear to enhance myocardial salvage or preservation of left ventricular function or to reduce the incidence of major arrhythmias in the early phase of infarction.

Safety of combined intravenous beta-adrenergic blockade (atenolol or metoprolol) and thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction

One hundred thirty-one patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) a mean of 3 hours after the onset of symptoms were treated with oral aspirin and intravenous thrombolytic therapy followed by heparin. One hundred eleven patients (85%) also received intravenous followed by oral beta blockers. Twenty-one patients (19%) discontinued the beta blocker because of complications. Five (4.5%) required the addition of diuretic drugs or converting enzyme inhibitors. Six patients (5%) discontinued the beta blocker after complete mechanical revascularization, and 1 patient was noncompliant. Long-term treatment continued in 90 patients (69%) over a 2-year follow-up period (average 13 months). There were 3 infarct extensions and 3 reinfarctions (5%). Overall mortality at 2 years was 10%. Intravenous beta blockers are well tolerated in most patients treated with thrombolytic agents, aspirin and heparin. They may further improve the survival benefit of chronic beta blocker therapy in the period after AMI.

Relationship between ATP resynthesis and calcium accumulation in the reperfused rat heart

1. The postulate that the composition of solutions used to reperfuse ischaemic hearts may modulate their ability to synthesize high-energy compounds was tested in isolated rat hearts subjected to 30 min normothermic ischaemia and then reperfused with either Krebs'-Henseleit buffer (K-H) for 20 min (control reperfusion, CR), or a 'myocardial protective solution' (MPS) for 5 min, followed by 15 min K-H (modified reperfusion, MR). The 'myocardial protective solution' was designed to protect against damage caused by sodium and calcium accumulation and by free radicals. Metabolic precursors were also included to promote and support adenosine triphosphate (ATP) resynthesis during reperfusion under both aerobic and hypoxic conditions. 2. 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was used to measure tissue ATP and creatine phosphate (CP), and atomic absorption spectrometry was used to measure Ca++. Early during CR, ATP recovered to 28% of the pre-ischaemic value, but fell to 5.5% with continued perfusion. Similarly, CP recovered to 45.5% of the pre-ischaemic level during early CR but fell to 25.5% with continued perfusion. 3. Better maintenance of ATP was seen during MR with oxygenated MPS (O2-MR), the final ATP remaining at 16.9% of the pre-ischaemic level. During O2-MR, CP recovered to 43.55 of the pre-ischaemic level but was not maintained and fell to a final level of 29.5%. 4. During MR with O2-free MPS (non-O2-MR), there was no reperfusion-associated fall in ATP or CP, with the levels maintained at 26.6% and 34.55, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Immediate versus deferred beta-blockade following thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Results of the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) II-B Study

In the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Phase II trial, patients received intravenous recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and were randomized to either a conservative or an invasive strategy. Within this study, the effects of immediate versus deferred beta-blocker therapy were also assessed in patients eligible for beta-blocker therapy, a group of 1,434 patients of which 720 were randomized to the immediate intravenous group and 714 to the deferred group. In the immediate intravenous group, within 2 hours of initiating rt-PA metoprolol was given (5 mg intravenously at 2-minute intervals over 6 minutes, for a total intravenous dose of 15 mg, followed by 50 mg orally every 12 hours in the first 24 hours and 100 mg orally every 12 hours thereafter). The patients assigned to the deferred group received metoprolol, 50 mg orally twice on day 6, followed by 100 mg orally twice a day thereafter. The therapy was tolerated well in both groups and the primary end point, resting global ejection fraction at hospital discharge, averaged 50.5% and was virtually identical in the two groups. The regional ventricular function was also similar in the two groups. Overall, there was no difference in mortality between the immediate intravenous and deferred groups, but in the subgroup defined as low risk there were no deaths at 6 weeks among those receiving immediate beta-blocker therapy in contrast to seven deaths among those in whom beta-blocker therapy was deferred. These findings for a secondary end point in a subgroup were not considered sufficient to warrant a recommendation regarding clinical use. There was a lower incidence of reinfarction (2.7% versus 5.1%, p = 0.02) and recurrent chest pain (18.8% versus 24.1%, p less than 0.02) at 6 days in the immediate intravenous group. Thus, in appropriate postinfarction patients, beta-blockers are safe when given early after thrombolytic therapy and are associated with decreased myocardial ischemia and reinfarction in the first week but offer no benefit over late administration in improving ventricular function or reducing mortality.

Preventive strategies in management of acute myocardial infarction

Recent studies on pathogenetic mechanisms, supplemented by findings in clinical trials point the way to a logical approach to acute evolving myocardial infarction. This is designed in the earliest stage to limit infarction through reduction in myocardial oxygen demands, improvement in collateral blood supply and dissolution of coronary thrombus, to prevent in a later stage coronary reocclusion through administration of antiplatelet agents, and then to prevent infarct expansion through reduction in ventricular wall tension throughout the period of repair. Application of such an approach holds the promise of reducing infarct size and all the complications of infarction, as well as short and long-term mortality. The approach is active and aggressive, and contrasts with the approach applied a decade ago, where infarction was accepted as inevitable and therapies were reserved for managing its complications.

Possible survival benefit from concomitant beta-but not calcium-antagonist therapy during reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction

To test the hypothesis that long-term beta- or calcium-antagonist therapy begun before the time of myocardial infarction and coronary reperfusion might improve patient in-hospital survival compared with reperfusion alone, 424 consecutive patients successfully reperfused with coronary angioplasty within 12 hours of infarct symptom onset were carefully and retrospectively characterized. Forty-seven patients (11%) were taking beta antagonists and 74 patients (17%) were taking calcium antagonists at the time of infarction. Patients receiving beta antagonists had a more frequent history of hypertension (p less than or equal to 0.001) and prior infarction (p less than or equal to 0.01) than those not so treated and patients receiving calcium antagonists had a more frequent history of prior infarction, prior angina, hypertension and diabetes (all p less than or equal to 0.001) than their nontreated counterparts. Stepwise logistic regression analysis found significant independent correlations between in-hospital death and the following variables: recurrent ischemia (p less than or equal to 0.001); proximal left anterior descending coronary infarct (p less than or equal to 0.001); 3-vessel disease (p = 0.002); patient age (p = 0.004); and initial total occlusion of the infarct artery (p = 0.022). After adjustment for these factors, beta antagonist use (mortality = 0 vs 8% without treatment) was still significantly correlated with improved survival (p = 0.048), whereas calcium-antagonist therapy made no difference in survival. Heart rate and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure upon presentation were significantly lower in patients treated with beta antagonists. Thus, beta-antagonists therapy, but probably not calcium-antagonist therapy, taken before reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction, may improve early survival compared to reperfusion alone. Larger studies will be required to confirm or refute these observations.

Determinants of infarct size in non-human primates

To achieve a better understanding of the major factors that determine infarct size in non-human primates, a mathematical model was constructed using stepwise regression analysis. The model was developed on the basis of infarct size measurements, including the anatomical area at risk, regional myocardial blood flow measurements and hemodynamic determinants obtained in 23 control baboons undergoing up to 2 h of coronary artery thrombosis followed by thrombolysis. In this model, the size of the perfusion bed of the occluded coronary artery and the duration of coronary artery occlusion were found to be the only important predictors of infarct size (expressed as a percentage of left ventricular mass). R2 (square or the multiple correlation coefficient) was 70% in this model. Collateral blood flow and rate-pressure product were not identified as important predictors of infarct size. In a second group of eight baboons, atenolol (0.1 mg.kg-1) was administered intravenously 15 min after the onset of coronary artery thrombosis. Predicted infarct size (based on the mathematical model obtained in the control group) was larger than the observed infarct size in seven out of eight cases. In four instances observed infarct size was smaller than the 95% lower limit of the predicted value. It is concluded that the determinants of infarct size in non-human primates differ from those in canine models with respect to collateral flow and estimates of myocardial oxygen consumption (rate pressure product). The developed mathematical model of infarct size prediction allows the detection of cardioprotective drug effects with an acceptable efficacy.

Coronary reperfusion by thrombolysis and early beta-adrenergic blockade in acute experimental myocardial infarction

The effects of beta-adrenergic blockade, thrombolysis and their combination on infarct size and left ventricular function were investigated in a canine model of thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Metoprolol was administered intravenously (0.5 mg/kg) over 10 min, starting 15 min after occlusion. Recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was given intravenously 1 h after occlusion for clot lysis. Anatomic infarct size was measured as a percent of perfusion area and ventricular mass. Left ventricular function was assessed by ejection fraction and the centerline method. Groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 were evaluated after 24 h and received, respectively, metoprolol plus rt-PA, rt-PA, metoprolol and no treatment; groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 were studied after 1 week and treated, respectively, as groups 1, 3, 5 and 7. Metoprolol did not influence infarct size and global or regional ventricular function after 24 h and 1 week. Thrombolysis reduced infarct size from 69.5 +/- 3.4% (24 h) and 76.6 +/- 1.8% (1 week) in the control group to, respectively, 44.1 +/- 11.6% and 39.5 +/- 10.5% (p greater than 0.05), did not influence left ventricular function after 24 h and was accompanied after 1 week by a definite recovery of global and regional left ventricular function when compared with findings in control dogs. Metoprolol plus rt-PA further reduced infarct size (percent perfusion area) to 20.4 +/- 3.7% and 19.9 +/- 8.1% after 24 h and 1 week, respectively (p = NS versus rt-PA).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reperfusion injury and its pharmacologic modification

Reperfusion injury includes a spectrum of events, such as reperfusion arrhythmias, vascular damage and no-reflow, and myocardial functional stunning. The concept of reperfusion injury remains controversial with many proposed mechanisms when applied to humans, whereas in animal models, there are two main proposed mechanisms: calcium over-load and formation of oxygen free radicals. To prove that reperfusion injury is specifically caused by reperfusion would require evidence that an intervention given at the time of reperfusion can diminish or abolish the injury as in the case of arrhythmias, which are thought to be mediated by excess recycling of cytosolic calcium with delayed afterdepolarizations and ventricular automaticity. In the case of myocardial stunning, the phenomenon may be mediated, at least in part, by a burst of free radicals formed within the first minute of reperfusion and improved by free radical scavengers given at the time of reperfusion. The alternate hypothesis is that cytosolic calcium overload damages mechanisms for normal intracellular calcium regulation so that the stunned myocardium responds to agents that are thought to increase intracellular cytosolic calcium, such as beta-receptor agonists. A further component of reperfusion injury, under active investigation, is microvascular damage with alterations at the level of platelets, leukocytes, and endothelial integrity. From the therapeutic point of view, the divergent results of experimental interventions and the possibility that the abrupt onset of reperfusion in animals differs from the situation in humans with thrombolysis means that the best way currently available to limit reperfusion injury is by minimizing the ischemic period by early reperfusion and by optimizing the metabolic status of the ischemic myocardium at the end of the ischemic period.

New concepts in the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction

Recent findings concerning the pathophysiology of acute myocardial infarction are reviewed and related to the potential for myocardial salvage. The myocardial infarction process can be divided into 2 phases, an early evolving phase (the first 6 hours) and a later convalescent phase. An evolving infarction is associated with an occluded coronary artery; in most cases, a thrombotic occlusion occurs. The human coronary artery normally has an intact endothelium, which has protective vasodilatory and antiplatelet-aggregating effects that are lost when the endothelium is damaged. The endothelium is exquisitely sensitive to trauma and can be damaged by high shear stress produced by narrowing of the coronary arteries that is not associated with reduced coronary blood flow. In addition, during this acute endothelial damage, monocellular infiltration of the coronary arteries has the potential to release factors that may cause platelet aggregation, enhance blood coagulation, attract other white blood cells or exert other effects on the coronary tree. Myocardial damage occurring in the early evolving stage is usually responsive to treatment that either restores myocardial oxygen supply or reduces myocardial oxygen demand. However, coronary events occurring after the first 6 hours usually are not responsive to such treatment. Certain clinical variables may shorten or extend the time period within which damaged myocardium can be saved. The findings suggest important approaches for intervention to modify the acute phase.

Late thrombolytic therapy preserves left ventricular function in patients with collateralized total coronary occlusion: primary end point findings of the Second Mount Sinai-New York University Reperfusion Trial

The change in left ventricular ejection fraction from preintervention to predischarge was prospectively assessed in 393 patients with acute myocardial infarction. Within 12 h of symptom onset (mean 6.3 +/- 2.7 h), patients were randomly assigned to a double-blind intracoronary infusion of streptokinase, nitroglycerin, both streptokinase and nitroglycerin or conventional therapy without acute cardiac catheterization. Treatment effects were also assessed in prospectively defined angiographic subsets. There was a significant interaction between streptokinase and nitroglycerin (p less than 0.01), resulting in an increase in ejection fraction of 3.9 percentage units in the combined treatment arm (p less than 0.001). Patients with collateral flow to a totally obstructed infarct-related artery showed a significant improvement over those without collateral flow in the streptokinase (5.4 +/- 2.5%) and streptokinase-nitroglycerin (10.6 +/- 2.7%) arms, but not in the nitroglycerin arm. Time to treatment did not influence the change in ejection fraction. In patients with initial subtotal occlusion, thrombolytic therapy was of no short-term benefit because ejection fraction increased by 6% in all three intervention arms. These findings indicate that relatively late thrombolytic therapy results in significant myocardial salvage in those patients with collateralized total coronary occlusion. This benefit is potentiated by concomitant nitroglycerin therapy.

Early treatment with intravenous metoprolol for suspected acute myocardial infarction: a phase IV United States trial. Phase IV Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Study Group

Recent randomized clinical trials have shown that total mortality and cardiovascular mortality are reduced by the early intravenous administration of beta-blockers to patients suspected of suffering from acute myocardial infarction. These trials were conducted on patients meeting strict entry criteria. In order to assess this therapy when applied to a broader range of myocardial infarction patients, we performed a Phase IV study of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. The study was designed to test whether early (less than 8 hours from onset of chest pain) intervention by practicing physicians with open label intravenous metoprolol for cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction achieved mortality results similar to those obtained in large randomized clinical trials. We studied 3824 patients treated by 741 physicians representing a broad spectrum of clinical practice in the United States. Seventy-two percent of the patients entered into the study had confirmed myocardial infarction (39% anterior, 39% inferior, 22% other locations) and 85% of all individuals treated tolerated the full intravenous dose of 15 mg of metoprolol. The 15 day total mortality and cardiovascular mortality rates were 4.9% and 4.5%; 90 day mortality rates were 6.9 and 5.9%. Patients with anterior infarctions had a significantly greater cumulative mortality rate than patients with other types of infarctions. Marked bradycardia (heart rate less than 45 beats per minute) in the first 8 hours post treatment occurred in 4.7% cases and hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg) occurred in 9.8% of cases. When compared with the results of the Göteborg and MIAMI trials of metoprolol, it appears that there is no appreciable increase in mortality or morbidity when metoprolol is used in the community practice of acute coronary care.

Effects of intravenous metoprolol on global and regional left ventricular function after coronary arterial reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction

Coronary reperfusion in myocardial infarction improves infarct zone motion, but its effect on the global ejection fraction has been less consistent. The directional movement of the ejection fraction is determined by the opposing influences of improved infarct zone motion and diminishing hyperkinesia in the noninfarct zone. Noninfarct zone hyperkinesia has been attributed to catecholamine stimulation, the Frank-Starling mechanism or intraventricular interactions that unload noninfarcted segments. To investigate the influence of catecholamine stimulation, 9 men presenting with a first myocardial infarction (mean age 53 +/- 13 years) were studied. Coronary reperfusion was accomplished less than 4 hours after the onset of myocardial infarction. Radionuclide ventriculography was then performed before and immediately after the intravenous administration of 15 mg of metoprolol. End-diastolic volume did not change, but end-systolic volume increased 28% after metoprolol (p = 0.041). The ejection fraction decreased from 55 +/- 13% before metoprolol to 45 +/- 14% after its administration (p = 0.002). There was no effect of intravenous metoprolol on infarct zone motion, whereas motion in the noninfarcted segment decreased (p = 0.002). The patients underwent repeat ventriculography after receiving metoprolol, 100 mg orally twice a day for 9 days. Infarct zone motion improved (p less than 0.002) and the ejection fraction increased to 55 +/- 12% (p less than 0.02). Normal zone motion did not change. Thus, compensatory hyperkinesia is at least in part caused by catecholamine stimulation. Conclusions regarding the effects of reperfusion on global ventricular performance can be influenced by the timing of ejection fraction determinations relative to metoprolol therapy.

Comparison of invasive and conservative strategies after treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Results of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) phase II trial

We treated 3262 patients with intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) within four hours of the onset of chest pain thought to be caused by myocardial infarction. Of these patients, 1636 were then randomly assigned to treatment according to an invasive strategy consisting of coronary arteriography 18 to 48 hours after the administration of rt-PA, followed by prophylactic percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) if arteriography demonstrated suitable anatomy; 1626 patients were randomly assigned to treatment according to a conservative strategy, as part of which arteriography and PTCA were to be performed only in patients with spontaneous or exercise-induced ischemia. In the group assigned to the invasive strategy, PTCA was attempted in 928 of the 1636 patients (56.7 percent); the procedure was anatomically successful in 93.3 percent. In the group assigned to the conservative strategy, 216 patients (13.3 percent) underwent clinically indicated PTCA within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. Reinfarction or death within 42 days, the primary end point, occurred in 10.9 percent of the group assigned to the invasive strategy and in 9.7 percent of those assigned to the conservative strategy (P not significant). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the ejection fraction at rest or during exercise, either at hospital discharge or six weeks after randomization. Eleven of 582 patients (1.9 percent) who received 150 mg of rt-PA and 15 of 2952 patients (0.5 percent) who received 100 mg of rt-PA had intracranial hemorrhage. A subgroup of 1390 patients who were eligible for short-term intravenous beta-blockade were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg of intravenous metoprolol immediately, followed by oral metoprolol, or oral metoprolol begun on day 6. The ejection fraction and the incidence of death in the two groups were similar during the hospital period. Total mortality within the first 6 days and at 42 days was also similar. However, in the group that received intravenous metoprolol, 16 patients had nonfatal reinfarctions and 107 patients had recurrent ischemic episodes by six days after entry into the study, as compared with 31 and 147 patients, respectively, among those randomly assigned to deferred oral beta-blockade (P = 0.02 and P = 0.005, respectively); the latter comparison was considered statistically significant according to the study criteria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Myocardial salvage after regional beta-adrenergic blockade

The aim of the study was to determine whether regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the coronary sinus limited myocardial damage after coronary artery occlusion in the canine model. Accordingly, open-chest anesthetized dogs were randomly allocated to one of three groups: a control group and groups treated with propranolol (in doses of 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mg/kg) given either intravenously or via the coronary sinus. The hypoperfused zone (i.e., risk area) and the extent of myocardial damage were assessed by autoradiography and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, respectively. Myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone was 84 +/- 5% in the control group (n = 9) and 78 +/- 7% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 63 +/- 6% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.05), and 62 +/- 7% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.02) in the groups receiving intravenous propranolol and 73 +/- 6% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 58 +/- 7% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.01), and 44 +/- 9% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.001) in groups receiving propranolol via the cardiac veins. There was a significant enhancement of myocardial salvage with increasing doses of propranolol delivered via the cardiac veins (linear regression trend, p less than 0.05). In contrast, myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone remained comparable with propranolol doses of 0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg administered intravenously (linear regression trend, NS).

IN CONCLUSION

(1) regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the cardiac veins afforded significant myocardial salvage and (2) the regional administration of propranolol resulted in significant reduction of myocardial damage in a dose-dependent fashion.

Thrombolytic reperfusion of acute myocardial infarction: resolved and unresolved issues

Intensive clinical investigation has led to the acceptance of many fundamental aspects of reperfusion therapy, especially its salutary effects on improved survival, left ventricular function and reduced infarct size. However, many unresolved issues are currently being addressed or will be the focus of future clinical trials. These include patient selection with respect to risk profile and time of presentation, the choice of a thrombolytic agent, the role of adjunctive therapies and the optimal use and timing of follow-up coronary revascularization procedures. The rapidly evolving status of myocardial reperfusion therapy is reviewed, with specific attention to these important yet unresolved aspects.

Evaluation of biochemical functions and ventricular performance in regional ischemic-reperfused myocardium by afterload reduction: differential effects of calcium blocking and non-calcium blocking vasodilators

The effects of afterload reduction with and without calcium blockade on reperfusion injury were studied in the pig. Reversible occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery was performed for 60 minutes followed by 120 minutes of reperfusion. For 15 minutes prior to and throughout reperfusion, treatment was administered with a calcium blocker (nifedipine or verapamil), a metallic organic dye and Ca2+ antagonist (ruthenium red), a vasodilator (nitroprusside), or saline. Biochemical functions, i.e., mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, myocardial ATP and Ca2+ content, and sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ uptake were determined. Regional left ventricular wall motion was measured echocardiographically. Nifedipine and ruthenium red improved biochemical indices of ischemic myocardium in part by reducing afterload and thereby reducing oxygen demand and in part by reducing calcium entry into cells and mitochondria. Verapamil in the doses used failed to reduce afterload and demonstrated no salutary effect on biochemical parameters in ischemic myocardium. Nitroprusside reduced afterload, improved mitochondrial ATP production and increased percent wall thickening. Our findings suggest that afterload reduction with and without calcium blockade during the early reperfusion phase improves ischemic myocardium. These changes are predominantly biochemical in nature.

Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

The hemodynamic responses to esmolol, an ultrashort-acting (t1/2 = 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in 16 patients with myocardial ischemia and compromised left ventricular function as evidenced by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 15 to 25 mm Hg. Esmolol was infused intravenously to a maximal dose of 300 micrograms/kg body weight per min for less than or equal to 48 h in 16 patients: 9 with acute myocardial infarction, 6 with periinfarction angina and 1 with acute unstable angina. The sinus rate and systolic arterial pressure declined rapidly in all patients from baseline values of 99 +/- 12 beats/min and 126 +/- 19 mm Hg to 80 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and 107 +/- 20 mm Hg (p less than or equal to 0.05) during esmolol treatment. Rate-pressure product decreased by 33% and cardiac index by 14% during esmolol treatment, but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly altered by drug infusion (19 +/- 3 mm Hg at baseline versus 19 +/- 5 during treatment, p = NS). In all patients there was a rapid return toward baseline hemodynamic measurements within 15 min of stopping administration of esmolol, and virtually complete resolution of drug effect was evident within approximately 30 min. During infusion of esmolol, four of nine patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin required downward adjustment of nitroglycerin infusion rate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infarct size in the dog after circumflex occlusion

In order to compare the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infact size, the left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 6 hours in 33 anesthetized dogs. The dogs (18 to 22 kg) were divided into three groups; group 1 (N = 10) served as controls, group 2 received intravenous nadolol (average dose 1.25 mg/kg) just prior to coronary occlusion, and group 3 received oral nadolol (80 mg) twice daily for 16 days prior to coronary occlusion. To ensure equivalent degrees of beta-blockade at the time of occlusion, group 2 and 3 dogs were given incremental doses of intravenous nadolol to abolish the chronotropic response to isoproterenol (2 mu/kg IV). Left ventricular pressure, its first derivative (dP/dt), and heart rate were monitored. The anatomic risk region was determined antemortem by Evan's blue staining while the infarct zone was delineated postmortem by tetrazolium staining. Compared to Group 1, heart rate was 22% lower in group 2 and 15% lower in group 3 dogs 6 hours after occlusion (p less than 0.05). There were no differences among groups in peak left ventricular systolic pressure or mean arterial pressure. Infarct size as a function of the area at risk was 68 +/- 3% in group 1, 52 +/- 7% in group 2, and 44 +/- 8% in group 3. A significant difference was found only between groups 3 and 1. The data suggest that chronic beta-blockade provides greater protection against ischemic-induced necrosis than does acute beta-blockade. The greater protective effect of chronic beta-blockade may be due to chronic adaptive changes in either blood flow or metabolism.