Chronic renal and neurohumoral effects of the calcium entry blocker nisoldipine in patients with congestive heart failure

Impact of amlodipine on clinical outcomes for heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: a Korean nationwide cohort study

Introduction

Amlodipine, widely used as a first-line treatment for hypertension, has inconclusive clinical evidence regarding its efficacy in patients with heart failure. This retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of amlodipine treatment after hospitalization for heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP).

Methods

A total of 20,851 patients who were diagnosed with DCMP and admitted for heart failure between 2005 and 2016 according to Korean nationwide medical insurance service database were enrolled. Amlodipine use was defined as its prescription at the time of discharge and for at least 180 days within a year. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was heart failure rehospitalization during a 5-year period. The outcomes between patients who received amlodipine (n = 6,798) and those who did not (n = 14,053) were compared.

Results

During the 5-year follow-up, the group treated with amlodipine exhibited a significantly lower risk of all-cause death and heart failure rehospitalization than the group not treated with amlodipine [all-cause death: adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.70, p < 0.001; cardiovascular death: adjusted HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.62-0.81, p < 0.001; heart failure rehospitalization: adjusted HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98, p = 0.006]. In a subgroup analysis, amlodipine had a significant impact on decreasing all-cause mortality in older adults, those with a higher systolic blood pressure, and those with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index.

Conclusion

In summary, amlodipine use after hospitalization for heart failure in patients with DCMP was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death and readmission for heart failure.

Hypocalcemic cardiomyopathy: A case report

Hypocalcemia and its related symptoms are common manifestations in postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, but patients with hypocalcemia manifested as heart failure is rare and few cases are reported in the literature. Here we reported a 58-year-old female with hypoparathyroidism and uncontrolled hypocalcemia after thyroidectomy, presented with acute heart failure, accompanied with enlargement and reduced ejection fraction of left ventricle. She was refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure including digitalis and diuretics. However, her symptoms resolved and cardiac function improved dramatically after normalization of serum calcium level. This rare case highlights the pivotal role of calcium in maintaining cardiac function and the importance of treating underlying reversible causes of heart failure. For patients with hypoparathyroidism, it is essential to get standard treatment to avoid development of heart failure and hypocalcemia related syndromes.

Remodeling of calcium handling in human heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is an increasing public health problem accelerated by a rapidly aging global population. Despite considerable progress in managing the disease, the development of new therapies for effective treatment of HF remains a challenge. To identify targets for early diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, it is essential to understand the molecular and cellular basis of calcium handling and the signaling pathways governing the functional remodeling associated with HF in humans. Calcium (Ca(2+)) cycling is an essential mediator of cardiac contractile function, and remodeling of calcium handling is thought to be one of the major factors contributing to the mechanical and electrical dysfunction observed in HF. Active research in this field aims to bridge the gap between basic research and effective clinical treatments of HF. This chapter reviews the most relevant studies of calcium remodeling in failing human hearts and discusses their connections to current and emerging clinical therapies for HF patients.

Polymorphisms in genes coding for GRK2 and GRK5 and response differences in antihypertensive-treated patients

OBJECTIVES

The G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) GRK2 and GRK5 are important regulators of β-adrenergic signaling. This study characterized single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the GRK2 gene (ADRBK1) and determined if these and a GRK5 Gln41Leu polymorphism affect the blood pressure (BP) response to atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide or adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensives.

METHODS

ADRBK1 regions were sequenced for 48 individuals. Putative functional SNPs were tested for mRNA expression differences in 96 lymphoblastoid cell line samples and 12 leukocyte samples from hypertensives. BP response to atenolol and hydrochlorothiazide by ADRBK1 SNPs and GRK5 Gln41Leu was tested in 418 patients from the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses Study using linear regression. The influence of ADRBK1 SNPs and GRK5 Gln41Leu on death, myocardial infarction or stroke in treated hypertensives was evaluated in a case-control cohort (1 : 3) of the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study GENEtic Substudy using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A novel ADRBK1 promoter SNP was not associated with differential GRK2 expression. GRK5 Leu41 decreased the risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes independent of treatment strategy (adjusted odds ratio 0.535, 95% confidence interval: 0.313-0.951, P=0.0222), but was not associated with BP response to antihypertensive medication. An ADRBK1 SNP (rs1894111 G>A) showed a signal for association with systolic and diastolic BP response to hydrochlorothiazide in Whites [diastolic BP: -11.29±3.74 (G/A) versus -4.26±4.79 mmHg (G/G), P=0.0034 and systolic BP: -18.37±14.90 (G/A), -8.11±7.55 mmHg (G/G), P=0.0191].

CONCLUSION

The GRK5 Leu41 allele protects from adverse cardiovascular outcomes in treated hypertensives.

Defining the role of calcium channel antagonists in heart failure due to systolic dysfunction

Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) may either be divided into the dihydropyridines (e.g. amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, lacidipine, nilvadipine, nifedipine, nicardipine etc.), the phenylalkylamines (e.g. verapamil) and the benzothiazepines (e.g. diltiazem) according to their chemical structure, or into first generation agents (nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem) and second generation agents (subsequently developed dihydropyridine-derivatives). Second generation CCAs are characterized by greater selectivity for calcium channels in vascular smooth muscle cells than the myocardium, a longer duration of action and a small trough-to-peak variation in plasma concentrations. Heart failure is characterized by decreased cardiac output resulting in inadequate oxygen delivery to peripheral tissues. Although the accompanying neurohormonal activation, leading to vasoconstriction and increased blood pressure, is initially beneficial in increasing tissue perfusion, prolonged activation is detrimental because it increases afterload and further reduces cardiac output. At the level of the myocyte, heart failure is associated with increased intracellular calcium levels which are thought to impair diastolic function. These changes indicate that the CCAs would be beneficial in patients with heart failure. There has been a strong interest and increasing experience in the use of CCAs in patients with heart failure. Despite potential beneficial effects in initial small trials, findings from larger trials suggest that CCA may have detrimental effects upon survival and cardiovascular events. However, this may not necessarily be a 'class b' effect of the CCAs as there is considerable heterogeneity in the chemical structure of individual agents. Clinical experience with different CCAs in patients with heart failure includes trials that evaluated their effects on hemodynamic parameters, exercise tolerance and on symptomatology. However, the most relevant results are those from randomized clinical trials that assessed mortality as the primary endpoint. First generation CCAs have direct negative inotropic effects and even sustained release formulations have not proved any beneficial effect upon survival. With second generation CCAs, some benefit on hemodynamic parameters has been observed but none on survival, alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors. It is noteworthy that although amlodipine had a neutral effect on morbidity and mortality in large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials in patients with heart failure, the drug was well tolerated. There is no specific indication for CCAs (first or second generation) in patients with systolic heart failure, alone or in combination with ACE inhibitors, but amlodipine may be a considered in the management of hypertension or coronary artery disease in patients with heart failure.

Using the emergency department clinical decision unit for acute decompensated heart failure

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a complex disease of epidemic proportions. In the United States, it accounts for more than 1 million hospitalizations annually,and heart failure represents the single greatest cost to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Studies. Half of the annual costs are estimated to be the result of hospitalization. Compared with other pathology, heart failure has a very high hospitalization rate, with 80% of emergency department ADHF patients being admitted. This high rate has resulted from the lack of successful management predictors available to the emergency physician and the lack of any disposition option other than hospitalization for the ADHF patient. The emergency department observation unit offers an alternative to hospitalization for patients with ADHF. Validated protocols have demonstrated that in ADHF, intensive short-term therapeutic, diagnostic, and educational protocols result in a marked improvement in hospitalization rates, while at the same time decreasing costs. New risk stratification data can aid in the identification of the appropriate candidate. The observation unit now represents a nonhospitalization disposition option for patients presenting to the emergency department with ADHF.viii CO

Heart failure management in the emergency department observation unit

The United States is currently in the midst of a heart failure epidemic. This has a tremendous impact on morbidity, mortality, and associated costs to our health care system. With demographic trends expected to double the at-risk cohort over the next 30 years, there is a serious need to develop more efficacious strategies addressing early diagnosis, treatment options, and outcomes in patients stricken with heart failure. This article reviews the newest diagnostics, therapeutics, and strategies for the management of heart failure and suggests appropriate implementation of these approaches in the emergency department observation unit.

Calcium channel blockers: an update

This paper reviews the current literature pertaining to calcium channel blockers, including their classification, properties, and therapeutic indications, in light of several recent trials that have addressed their safety. Calcium channel blockers are a structurally and functionally heterogeneous group of medications that are used widely to control blood pressure and manage symptoms of angina. They are classified as dihydropyridines or nondihydropyridines. As a class, they are well tolerated and are associated with few side effects. The question of whether they may precipitate cardiovascular events has been largely settled by recent trials, such as the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), the International Verapamil Slow-Release/Trandolapril Study (INVEST), and the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) study, in which no such association was found. Even so, the use of these agents has been linked with an increased risk of heart failure. Thus, long-acting calcium channel blockers may be safely used in the management of hypertension and angina. However, as a class, they are not as protective as other antihypertensive agents against heart failure.

Neurohormones and oxidative stress in nonischemic cardiomyopathy: relationship to survival and the effect of treatment with amlodipine

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of amlodipine on neurohormones and oxidative stress in nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and determine the relationship between baseline and posttreatment levels of these markers with survival.

BACKGROUND

Neurohormones and oxidative stress are important in the pathophysiology of heart failure. Calcium-channel blockers are associated with poor outcomes in patients with heart failure, in part due to neurohormonal activation. In contrast, amlodipine, a second-generation dihydropyridine, has a more favorable clinical profile.

METHODS

In the Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation 2 (PRAISE-2) trial, a subset of 181 patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to amlodipine (10 mg/day) or placebo. Blood samples were evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 26 weeks for norepinephrine, epinephrine, angiotensin II, dopamine, N-terminal pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (Nt-pro-ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), adrenolutin and malondialdehyde.

RESULTS

There was no difference in levels of neurohormones or oxidative stress markers between the amlodipine and placebo groups at the different times. Both Nt-pro-ANP and BNP decreased at 2 weeks and at 26 weeks. Baseline Nt-pro-ANP correlated with survival in multivariate analysis (P =.001). A strong relationship was found between a reduction in BNP at 26 weeks and survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.153 (95% CI 0.051-0.461, P =.017). No relationship was found between markers of oxidative stress and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that amlodipine does not affect circulating neurohormones and oxidative stress markers in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, digoxin and diuretics. In addition, low circulating Nt-pro-ANP and a reduction in BNP over time confers a good prognosis.

Observation unit management of heart failure

The acute exacerbation of HF can be treated successfully in the OU. There are significant benefits, such as admission avoidance, decreased 90-day readmissions, and decreased costs. HF requires a comprehensive management program with extensive involvement from a multidisciplinary team committed to improving care for this population, however.

Left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly

Previous studies using pulsed Doppler echocardiography have demonstrated a pattern of abnormal left ventricular relaxation associated with increasing age. Specifically, aging is associated with decreased peak velocity of early diastolic mitral inflow, increased peak velocity of late diastolic inflow, increased isovolumic relaxation time, and early diastolic deceleration time. Abnormal relaxation can progress to significantly elevated left atrial pressure--characterized by increased early peak velocity and shortened isovolumic relaxation time and deceleration time--as part of the disease processes. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is highly prevalent, occurring in one half to two thirds of elderly patients with congestive heart failure, in association with normal systolic function. Left ventricular hypertrophy, which is commonly related to systemic arterial hypertension, and ischemic heart disease are the two major causes of abnormal left ventricular diastolic function in the elderly. Recently, newer echocardiographic techniques have been described that allow more accurate evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Treatments for left ventricular diastolic dysfunction should focus on the underlying disease etiology as well as on the derangement in left ventricular diastolic function. Although calcium channel blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been used clinically to treat diastolic dysfunction, their effects on prognosis remain unproven.

Amlodipine therapy in congestive heart failure: hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects at rest and after treadmill exercise

This study examined the acute effects of amlodipine treatment on left ventricular pump function, systemic hemodynamics, neurohormonal status, and regional blood flow distribution in an animal model of congestive heart failure (CHF), both at rest and with treadmill exercise. A total of 14 pigs were studied under control conditions and after the development of pacing-induced CHF (240 beats per minute, 3 weeks, n = 7) or with CHF and acute amlodipine treatment for the last 3 days of pacing (1.5 mg/kg per day, n = 7). Under resting conditions, left ventricular stroke volume (mL) was reduced with CHF compared with the normal state (15+/-2 vs. 31+/-1, p<0.05) and increased with amlodipine treatment (23+/-4, p<0.05). At rest, systemic vascular resistance increased with CHF compared with the normal state (3,078+/-295 vs. 2,131+/-120 dyne x s cm(-5), p<0.05) and was reduced after amlodipine treatment (2,472+/-355 dyne x s cm(-5), p<0.05). With exercise, left ventricular stroke volume remained lower and systemic vascular resistance higher in the CHF group, but was normalized with amlodipine treatment. With exercise, left ventricular myocardial blood flow increased from resting values, but was reduced from the normal state with CHF (normal: 1.69+/-0.12 to 7.62+/-0.74 mL/min per gram vs. CHF: 1.26+/-0.12 to 4.77+/-0.45 mL/min per gram, both p<0.05) and was normalized with acute amlodipine treatment (1.99+/-0.35 to 6.29+/-1.23 mL/min per gram). Resting plasma norepinephrine was increased by >5-fold in the CHF group at rest and was not affected by amlodipine treatment. However, with exercise, amlodipine treatment blunted the increase in plasma norepinephrine by >50% when compared with untreated CHF values. Resting plasma endothelin levels increased with CHF compared with the normal state (10.9+/-0.9 vs. 2.8+/-0.4 fmol/mL, p<0.05) and was reduced with amlodipine treatment (7.5+/-1.5 fmol/mL, p<0.5). In other vascular beds, acute amlodipine treatment with CHF improved pulmonary and renal blood flow both at rest and with exercise; however, there were no effects observed on skeletal muscle blood flow. With the development of CHF, acute amlodipine treatment does not negatively influence left ventricular pump function, but rather may provide favorable hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects.

Amlodipine promotes kinin-mediated nitric oxide production in coronary microvessels of failing human hearts

Recently, we found that amlodipine can release nitric oxide (NO) from canine coronary microvessels, which raises the question of whether amlodipine can also promote coronary NO production in failing human hearts. The goal of this study was to define the effect of amlodipine on NO production in failing human hearts and to determine the role of kinins in the control of NO production induced by amlodipine. Six explanted human hearts with end-stage heart failure were obtained immediately at transplant surgery. Coronary microvessels were isolated as previously described, and nitrite, the stable metabolite of NO in aqueous solution, was measured using the Griess Reaction. Amlodipine (10(-10) to 10(-5) mol/L) significantly increased nitrite production in coronary microvessels in a dose-dependent manner. The increase in nitrite in response to the highest dose of amlodipine (79%) was similar in magnitude to either that of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramiprilat (74%) or the neutral endopeptidase inhibitors phosphoramidon (61%) and thiorphan (72%). Interestingly, the increase in nitrite production induced by amlodipine was entirely abolished by N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester and also HOE-140 (a bradykinin-2 antagonist) and dichloroisocoumarin (a serine protease inhibitor that blocks kallikrein activity). These results indicate that amlodipine can promote coronary NO production in failing human hearts and that this effect is dependent on a kinin-mediated mechanism.

Effect of prolonged treatment with amlodipine on enhanced vascular contractility in cardiomyopathic hamsters

This study examined the effects of prolonged treatment with amlodipine on the enhanced vascular contractions in dilated cardiomyopathic (CM) hamsters. From the ages of 5 to 20 weeks, CM hamsters (BIO 53.58) orally received amlodipine. Then we compared the contractile responses to vasoconstrictors in aortas and mesenteric arteries from CM hamsters with or without treatment with those in the arteries from controls (F1b). We also investigated the effect of amlodipine treatment on the Ca2+ sensitivity of tension in beta-escin-skinned smooth muscle of mesenteric artery. The contractile responses to phenylephrine, angiotensin II, and high K+ in both aorta and mesenteric artery were greatly enhanced in CM hamsters compared with controls. Amlodipine treatment slightly but significantly inhibited the enhanced responses in aorta but did not alter the responses in mesenteric arteries. The Ca2+ sensitivity of tension was significantly increased in CM hamster preparations, which was unaffected by amlodipine treatment. These data indicate that amlodipine treatment differentially affects the enhanced responses to vasoconstrictors between large and small blood vessels from CM hamsters. The lack of effect of amlodipine treatment on the responsiveness of CM mesenteric artery leads to the suggestion that the preventive effect of amlodipine on focal myocytolytic necrosis of cardiomyocytes, which was previously reported to be the main cause of cardiomyopathy, results from an action on cardiomyocytes.

Hospital use and costs among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in the first prospective randomized amlodipine survival evaluation study

The incidence of hospitalizations, lengths of stay, and per-diem costs were determined for 421 patients (amlodipine, 209; placebo, 212) with nonischemic cardiomyopathy in the first Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation (PRAISE) study to assess the impact of amlodipine on hospital use and to compare the costs of hospitalization with the cost of amlodipine treatment. Treatment with amlodipine versus placebo significantly delayed the mean (+/- SD) time to first hospitalization (447 +/- 26 d vs 315 +/- 18 d, respectively; P = 0.0139). Both treatment groups showed a similar number of hospital admissions per patient per year. The overall hospital length of stay was 1.17 days less per year with amlodipine than with placebo, at a cost of $1098 less per person per year although these differences were not statistically significant. Significantly fewer amlodipine patients were admitted for unexplained cardiac arrest (odds ratio, 0.235; P = 0.002) and ventricular arrhythmias (odds ratio, 0.497; P = 0.004). These findings are consistent with clinical reports from PRAISE of prolonged survival and a reduction in sudden cardiac death among patients with severe heart failure due to nonischemic heart disease. This analysis suggests that in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, treatment with amlodipine can delay the time to hospitalization and may reduce the number of hospital admissions related to ventricular arrhythmias. The estimated reduction in hospital costs of $1098 per year would more than offset the amlodipine treatment cost of approximately $700 per year.

The role of neurohormonal antagonists in hibernating myocardium

Hibernating myocardium is characterized by chronic reduction of myocardial blood flow due to obstructive coronary artery disease, causing reversible left ventricular dysfunction and flow-metabolism mismatch. The condition is unstable and increasing demand may lead to further left ventricular dysfunction or necrosis causing death or worsening heart failure. Recognition of the condition is difficult and requires complex cardiac imaging protocols. Treatment protocols are also poorly defined. This review addresses both the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hibernating myocardium.

Long-term morbidity and mortality trials with amlodipine

Prospective controlled clinical trials with cardiovascular events and mortality as end points are needed to provide clinicians with a fully informed choice of optimal hypertensive therapy. Seven trials (six of them still ongoing) have provided insight into the effects of the third-generation calcium antagonist, amlodipine, on mortality and end-organ damage in patients with hypertension or other forms of cardiovascular disease. The completed PRAISE study has addressed the safety of amlodipine in patients with advanced heart failure (CHF). The trial showed that amlodipine does not increase mortality or morbidity in CHF patients and significantly reduces the risk for these end points in patients whose CHF has a nonischemic etiology. The PRAISE-2 study is now under way to further evaluate the benefits of amlodipine in nonischemic CHF patients. The ALLHAT trial compares the effects of standard diuretic treatment with three alternative treatments (amlodipine, lisinopril, and doxazosin) on the incidence of fatal coronary artery disease (CAD) and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) in 40,000 hypertensive patients. The ASCOT trial compares the effects of amlodipine +/- perindopril with atenolol +/- bendrofluazide on fatal CAD and nonfatal MI in 18,000 high-risk patients. The PREVENT trial tests a similar hypothesis, looking at the effects of amlodipine on arterial atherosclerotic lesions, and the AASK trial is evaluating the effects of amlodipine on renal disease. The PRAISE trial has provided valuable information on the safety and efficacy of amlodipine in preventing death and disability in patients with CHF. The six ongoing trials will provide important additional information on the effect of amlodipine in patients with heart disease of other etiologies.

Effects of amlodipine on sympathetic nerve traffic and baroreflex control of circulation in heart failure

Short-acting calcium antagonists exert a sympathoexcitation that in heart failure further enhances an already elevated sympathetic activity. Whether this is also the case for long-acting formulations is not yet established, despite the prognostic importance of sympathetic activation in heart failure. It is also undetermined whether in this condition long-acting calcium antagonists favorably affect a mechanism potentially responsible for the sympathetic activation, ie, the baroreflex impairment. In 28 heart failure patients (NYHA functional class II) under conventional treatment we measured plasma norepinephrine and efferent postganglionic muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography) at rest and during arterial baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation induced by stepwise intravenous infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside, respectively. Measurements were performed at baseline and after 8 weeks of daily oral amlodipine administration (10 mg/d, 14 patients) or before and after an 8-week period without calcium antagonist administration (14 patients). Amlodipine caused a small and insignificant blood pressure reduction. Heart rate, left ventricular ejection fraction, and plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations were not affected. This was the case also for plasma norepinephrine (from 2.43+/-0.41 to 2.50+/-0.34 nmol/L, mean+/-SEM), muscle sympathetic nerve activity (from 54.4+/-5.9 to 51.0+/-4.3 bursts/min), and arterial baroreflex responses. No change in the above-mentioned variables was seen in the control group. Thus, in mild heart failure amlodipine treatment does not adversely affect sympathetic activity and baroreflex control of the heart and sympathetic tone. This implies that in this condition long-acting calcium antagonists can be administered without untoward neurohumoral effects anytime conventional treatment needs to be complemented by drugs causing additional vasodilatation.

Amlodipine monotherapy, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, and combination therapy with pacing-induced heart failure

In patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) receiving therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition, institution of calcium channel antagonism with amlodipine provided favorable effects. The goal of the present study was to define potential mechanisms for these effects by measuring left ventricular function, hemodynamics, and neurohormonal system activity in a model of CHF in which amlodipine treatment had been instituted either as a monotherapy or in combination with ACE inhibition. Thirty-two pigs were instrumented to allow measurement of cardiac index, total systemic resistance index, and neurohormonal activity in the conscious state and assigned to one of four groups: (1) rapid atrial pacing (240 bpm) for 3 weeks (n = 8), (2) amlodipine (1.5 mg x kg(-1) x d[-1]) and pacing (n = 8), (3) ACE inhibition (fosinopril 1.0 mg/kg BID) and pacing (n = 8), and (4) amlodipine and ACE inhibition (1.0 mg x kg(-1) x d(-1) and 1.0 mg/kg BID, respectively) and pacing (n = 8). Measurements were obtained in the normal control state and after the completion of the treatment protocols. With rapid pacing, basal resting cardiac index was reduced compared with control values (2.7+/-0.2 versus 4.7+/-0.1 L x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively, P<.05) and increased from rapid pacing-only values with either amlodipine or combination therapy (3.7+/-0.3 and 4.4+/-0.5 L x min(-1) x m(-2), respectively, P<.05). Basal resting total systemic resistance index was higher in the rapid pacing-only group compared with control values (2731+/-263 versus 1721+/-53 dyne x s x cm(-5) x m2, respectively, P<.05), was reduced with either amlodipine treatment or ACE inhibition (2125+/-226 and 2379+/-222 dyne x s x cm(-5) x m2, respectively, P<.05), and was normalized with combination therapy. Plasma catecholamines, renin activity, and endothelin levels were increased threefold with rapid pacing. Amlodipine, either as a monotherapy or in combination with ACE inhibition, did not result in increased plasma catecholamines and renin activity compared with the rapid pacing-only group. Furthermore, combination therapy reduced steady state norepinephrine and normalized epinephrine levels. The results of the present study demonstrated that monotherapy with either amlodipine or ACE inhibition provides beneficial effects in this pacing model of CHF. Combined amlodipine and ACE inhibition provided greater benefit with respect to vascular resistance properties and neurohormonal system activity compared with either monotherapy.

The clinical significance of neurohormonal activation

Progressive heart disease after the onset of left ventricular dysfunction has typically been attributed to hemodynamic factors. As left ventricular function declines, decreased cardiac output and tissue hypoperfusion lead to compensatory increases in afterload, preload, and heart rate. The purpose of these compensatory responses is to increase cardiac output and maintain tissue perfusion; however, they may also create hemodynamic stress for the failing heart. However, this does not explain the progression of heart failure despite hemodynamic maintenance with pharmacologic therapy. Activation of neurohormonal systems that are essential for homeostasis in the normal heart plays a key role in the progression of heart failure. In acute heart failure, these systems have beneficial effects, but in chronic heart failure their activation produces deleterious effects by increasing the load on the left ventricle and promoting structural remodeling, which may further impair left ventricular function. The issue of neurohormonal activation is an important one in cardiovascular medicine, not only for patients with heart failure but also for patients with hypertension and ischemic heart disease when left ventricular dysfunction is present. As neurohormonal activation may play a pathogenic role in the long-term outcome of patients, interventions that have favorable hemodynamic but unfavorable neurohormonal effects can actually exacerbate cardiac disease and may increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. As neurohormonal activation appears to parallel the severity of heart failure, whether assessed according to symptoms or prognosis, an understanding of neurohormonal activation and its interaction with hemodynamic factors is essential for optimizing pharmacologic therapy for cardiovascular disease.

Safety of calcium antagonists in patients with congestive heart failure

Continuing high morbidity and mortality have spurred an ongoing search for new therapeutic agents for patients with congestive heart failure. Calcium antagonists (CAs) have been under active investigation in patients with heart failure since their introduction into clinical medicine, because their anti-ischemic and vasodilator properties were thought to be of potential benefit in this patient population. However, review of published clinical trials of CAs in patients with heart failure reveals that some of these drugs are associated with detrimental effects, including acute hemodynamic deterioration, increased symptoms of heart failure, and increased mortality. The adverse effects of short-acting CAs in patients with heart failure include negative inotropic effects and neurohormonal activation. Long-acting CAs, such as amlodipine and felodipine, had fewer negative inotropic effects, showed less evidence of neurohormonal activation, and were better tolerated in clinical trials. Amlodipine, in combination with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, had a neutral effect in patients with ischemic heart failure and an unexplained benefit in a subgroup of patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Although the preliminary experience with long-acting dihydropyridine CAs in heart failure has been encouraging, safety concerns raised by past trials dictate that no CA can be recommended for the treatment of heart failure at this time.

Calcium channel blocker-induced protection against cardiovascular damage

The therapeutic effects of calcium channel blockers on heart failure are controversial. However, a recent clinical trial demonstrated a favorable effect of amlodipine on survival rates in patients with heart failure resulting from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. There are a number of studies showing that cytokines generated by activated immune cells cause an increase in nitric oxide (NO) via induction of NO synthase (NOS), which results in a direct negative inotropic effect and a modulation of inotropic responsiveness. Increases in inflammatory circulating cytokines have been detected in patients with heart failure and cardiomyopathy, elevated plasma levels of nitrite/nitrate in patients with heart failure have been reported, and inducible NOS (iNOS) has been found in ventricular tissue from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. In our recent study, amlodipine improved histopathological lesions in the heart and survival rates in a murine model of nonischemic heart failure induced by encephalomyocarditis virus. Amlodipine inhibited NO production in vitro and decreased the number of iNOS positive cells in vivo. In this model, the therapeutic effect of amlodipine on myocardial injury is considered in part to result from inhibition of overproduction of NO. In this review, the possible roles of cytokines and NO in the pathophysiology of heart failure are discussed, along with the opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Beneficial effects of amlodipine in a murine model of congestive heart failure induced by viral myocarditis. A possible mechanism through inhibition of nitric oxide production

BACKGROUND

Although calcium channel blockers have not been shown to be beneficial for the treatment of patients with heart failure, a recent clinical trial demonstrated a favorable effect of amlodipine on the survival of patients with heart failure resulting from nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. We investigated the effects of amlodipine on a murine model of congestive heart failure induced by the M variant of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four-week-old male DBA/2 mice were inoculated with EMCV and administered amlodipine, diltiazem, or vehicle PO for 2 weeks. The heart weight-to-body weight ratio and the histopathological grades of myocardial lesions were significantly lower and survival was significantly increased in the amlodipine-treated group (P < .01, P < .05, and P < .05, respectively) than in the control group. In vitro, amlodipine added to murine J774A.1 macrophages concomitant with EMCV inhibited nitrite formation in a concentration-dependent manner, but diltiazem did not. Furthermore, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of NO synthesis, decreased myocardial lesions significantly in this murine model. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the number of cells stained with antibody against an inducible NO synthase decreased significantly in the amlodipine-treated group compared with that in the control group (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Amlodipine appears to have a protective effect against myocardial injury in this animal model of congestive heart failure. The therapeutic effect of amlodipine may be in part resulting from inhibition of overproduction of NO.

Hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of flosequinan in patients with heart failure

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the central and peripheral hemodynamic effects of 100 mg oral flosequinan and the impact of this drug on neurohormonal activation were noninvasively evaluated in 18 patients with congestive heart failure, after the first administration and after 10 days of treatment. No significant hemodynamic and neurohormonal changes were observed after acute administration. After 10 days, flosequinan produced central and peripheral hemodynamic improvement characterized by an increase in left ventricular circumferential fiber shortening velocity (+12%), a decrease in total systemic resistance (-36%), and an increase in leg blood flow (+37%). No significant changes were observed in heart rate and arterial pressure in patients receiving flosequinan, though a slight increase in heart rate (+17%) was recorded. Despite these favorable hemodynamic effects, flosequinan significantly increased plasma norepinephrine (+38%) and plasma renin activity (+13%) after 10 days of treatment. Thus, the beneficial central and peripheral hemodynamic effects of flosequinan are accompanied by activation of the sympathetic and reninangiotensin systems. This might be related to the unfavorable effects of the drug on survival in patients with heart failure.

Calcium antagonists in patients with left ventricular dysfunction: back on the bridge?

Calcium antagonists have a useful role in the management of patients with cardiac disease, producing coronary and systemic vasodilatation and an additional possibly beneficial effect on ventricular diastolic function. On the other hand, the myocardial depressant effect of the first-generation drugs and the abrupt changes in blood pressure, with neurohormonal activation, have been associated with worsening heart failure in certain patients. The present review summarizes the data currently available, with emphasis on the newer slow-release and long-acting calcium antagonists. Use of these drugs minimizes the peak and trough effect associated with short-acting preparations, and particularly when administered against a background of digoxin, diuretic and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, may be associated with better long-term results in patients with ventricular dysfunction. The DEFIANT studies, using nisoldipine-coat core, showed that nisoldipine-CC improved diastolic ventricular function and had a significant anti-ischemic effect in patients with mild-moderate ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction. The VHeFT III trial showed that felodipine had no effect on exercise capacity or survival in patients with Class 2-3 heart failure. In the PRAISE study of Class 3-4 patients, amlodipine was neutral in patients with ischemic disease, but a strikingly beneficial effect was observed in non-ischemic heart failure (45% decrease in mortality). The precise mechanism for the beneficial effect of amlodipine in these patients is unknown. Further studies are needed to examine the issue of survival benefit in patients with non-ischemic heart failure and the mechanisms involved.

Effect of amlodipine on morbidity and mortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized Amlodipine Survival Evaluation Study Group

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that calcium-channel blockers increase morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic heart failure. We studied the effect of a new calcium-channel blocker, amlodipine, in patients with severe chronic heart failure.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 1153 patients with severe chronic heart failure and ejection fractions of less than 30 percent to double-blind treatment with either placebo (582 patients) or amlodipine (571 patients) for 6 to 33 months, while their usual therapy was continued. The randomization was stratified on the basis of whether patients had ischemic or nonischemic causes of heart failure. The primary end point of the study was death from any cause and hospitalization for major cardiovascular events.

RESULTS

Primary end points were reached in 42 percent of the placebo group and 39 percent of the amlodipine group, representing a 9 percent reduction in the combined risk of fatal and nonfatal events with amlodipine (95 percent confidence interval, 24 percent reduction to 10 percent increase; P=0.31). A total of 38 percent of the patients in the placebo group died, as compared with 33 percent of those in the amlodipine group, representing a 16 percent reduction in the risk of death with amlodipine (95 percent confidence interval, 31 percent reduction to 2 percent increase; P=0.07). Among patients with ischemic heart disease, there was no difference between the amlodipine and placebo groups in the occurrence of either end point. In contrast, among patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, amlodipine reduced the combined risk of fatal and nonfatal events by 31 percent (P=0.04) and decreased the risk of death by 46 percent (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Amlodipine did not increase cardiovascular morbidity or mortality in patients with severe heart failure. The possibility that amlodipine prolongs survival in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy requires further study.

Cell death in the failing heart: role of an unnatural growth response to overload

Hypertrophy of the overloaded heart, characterized by an increased number of sarcomeres, provides an adaptive, short-term response. However, when cardiac overload is long-standing, the hypertrophic response appears to cause shortened myocyte survival. The mechanisms responsible for the deleterious effects of chronic myocardial hypertrophy may include a maladaptive growth response of the mature heart. Because terminally differentiated adult cardiac myocytes have little or no capacity to divide, stimuli that promote growth in the overloaded adult heart cannot lead to normal cell division. Instead, overload initiates an unnatural growth response that appears to shorten cardiac myocyte survival, possibly because the same growth factors that mediate the hypertrophic response of the adult heart can also induce programmed cell death (apoptosis). The converting enzyme inhibitors and nitrates, which have growth-inhibitory as well as vasodilator effects, may improve prognosis in heart failure by inhibiting the production of transcription factors. These transcription factors stimulate both the unnatural growth response to overload and stimuli that lead to apoptosis. Since both beta-adrenergic agonists and cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha, can stimulate production of similar transcription factors, evidence suggests that beta blockers and vesnarinone improve the prognosis in patients with heart failure possibly because of their ability to inhibit maladaptive growth.

Efficacy and safety of nisoldipine coat core in the management of angina pectoris, systemic hypertension, and ischemic ventricular dysfunction

The effects of the long-acting dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nisoldipine coat core (CC) have been investigated in > 3,500 patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, and ischemic ventricular dysfunction. In patients with angina pectoris, nisoldipine CC improved total treadmill exercise duration (p = 0.027), delayed the onset of angina pectoris (p = 0.009), and increased time to exercise-induced ST-segment depression (p = 0.061). In general, nisoldipine 20-40 mg was effective, and the dose-response curve flattened thereafter. In patients with hypertension, 10-40 mg once daily as monotherapy reduced blood pressure (p < 0.05), with a fall in diastolic pressure of > or = 10 mm Hg or a final diastolic pressure of < 90 mm Hg in 35-63% of patients. In most patients followed for a year, nisoldipine CC was continued as monotherapy. Efficacy was similar in patients < 65 and > 65 years of age. In the Doppler Flow and Echocardiography in Functional Cardiac Insufficiency: Assessment of Nisoldipine Therapy (DEFIANT-I) study of patients recovering from myocardial infarction, nisoldipine CC had a salutary effect on diastolic ventricular function, with a higher transmitral early filling velocity and shorter isovolumic relaxation time than in patients receiving placebo. Bicycle exercise capacity was greater (by 12 W; 95% confidence interval, 0.8-23.3) and exercise-induced ischemia occurred less frequently. The nisoldipine CC data pool (3,679 patients) showed that the drug was well tolerated with a low incidence of side effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical pharmacology of nisoldipine coat core

Nisoldipine is a second-generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonist structurally related to nifedipine and used in the treatment of stable angina and arterial hypertension. It is also under investigation for the treatment of left ventricular dysfunction. It was first developed as an immediate release tablet, but this formulation was not considered optimal for once-daily administration because of the variable results obtained at peak and trough in clinical studies. Consequently, nisoldipine coat core (CC) was developed with the aim of optimizing the drug's time--effect profile over the 24-hour dosing interval. The in vitro release pattern classifies this tablet as an "extended release" formulation according to European Community guidelines. The present article outlines the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of nisoldipine CC, as obtained from recent clinical studies.

Effects of the calcium channel blockers, diltiazem and Ro 40-5967, on systemic haemodynamics and plasma noradrenaline levels in conscious dogs with pacing-induced heart failure

1. Calcium channel blockers increase cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. These adverse effects are probably related to the negative inotropic effect of calcium channel blockers and/or a neurohormonal activation. 2. The present study was designed to examine, in conscious dogs, the acute haemodynamic and sympathetic effects of diltiazem and Ro 40-5967 (a novel calcium channel blocker) in the control state and in heart failure. 3. Thirteen dogs were instrumented with a micromanometer and an aortic catheter. After completion of experiments in the control state, heart failure was induced by right ventricular pacing (250 beats min-1, 3 weeks). Diltiazem and Ro 40-5967 were given intravenously (0.8 mg kg-1 and 1.0 mg kg-1 respectively). Cardiac output was measured by a thermodilution technique. 4. In the control state, both agents decreased similarly mean aortic pressure with significant increases in heart rate, cardiac output (both +1.0 l min-1 and P < 0.001) and plasma noradrenaline (both +55%) without changes in left ventricular dP/dtmax. In heart failure, for matched decreases in mean aortic pressure, neither diltiazem nor Ro 40-5967 changed heart rate significantly; diltiazem decreased cardiac output (-0.3 l min-1, P < 0.02) and dP/dtmax (-14%, P < 0.001) while Ro 40-5967 still increased cardiac output (+0.3 l min-1, P < 0.02) although the increased amount was smaller than in the control state. Plasma noradrenaline level was increased more during diltiazem infusion (+120%) than during Ro 40-5967 infusion (+38%, P < 0.001). 5. Diltiazem and Ro 40-5967 have similar haemodynamic and sympathetic effects in the control state.Heart failure alters haemodynamic and sympathetic responses to both calcium channel blockers but the magnitude of the alteration appears to be different. Diltiazem exerts a depressant effect on cardiac function which cannot be overcome by its vasodilator effect and sympathetic stimulation, while Ro 40-5967 has little effect on cardiac function. These data suggest that novel calcium channel blockers with less depressant effect may not be detrimental in heart failure.

Long-term clinical effect of nilvadipine in patients with chronic heart failure: a double-blind placebo-controlled study

The long-term effect of calcium channel blockers on chronic heart failure is disappointing, probably because of reflex sympathetic activation through arterial vasodilation. However, nilvadipine may be beneficial for treatment of chronic heart failure since this drug has minimal effects on sympathetic activation. In this study, the effects of 12-week administration of nilvadipine or placebo on symptoms of heart failure and cardiac function were investigated in 23 patients with mild-to-moderate chronic heart failure in a double-blind trial. The patients were randomly assigned to either a nilvadipine group (16 mg daily) or a placebo group. Intergroup comparisons did not show significant differences in any parameters. Serious adverse effects were not observed during the study. Thus, this study failed to show any beneficial effect of nilvadipine in the long-term treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. We conclude that the long-term administration of nilvadipine (16 mg daily) is neither effective nor harmful in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure.

The DEFIANT study of left ventricular function and exercise performance after acute myocardial infarction. Doppler Flow and Echocardiology in Functional Cardiac Insufficiency: Assessment of Nisoldipine Therapy Study Group

The DEFIANT-I study (Doppler Flow and Echocardiography in Functional cardiac Insufficiency: Assessment of Nisoldipine Therapy) was a multicenter, multinational double-blind randomized study of the effects of the new calcium channel blocking drug nisoldipine on left ventricular (LV) size and function after acute myocardial infarction. Randomization to placebo or to long-acting nisoldipine core coat (20 mg once daily) was performed in 135 eligible patients with mild to moderate systolic LV dysfunction (LV ejection fraction < or = 50%) 20 days (range 7-35) after infarction, with serial clinical, echocardiographic, and Doppler cardiographic measurements during a 4 week follow-up period. At the end of the follow-up period, exercise capacity was determined by bicycle ergometry. Nisoldipine improved indices of diastolic LV function. Early diastolic transmitral blood flow velocity increased, with an increase in peak E wave of 0.06 m/sec (95% confidence intervals [CI], 0.01, 0.11) and an increase in time velocity integral of 1.2 cm (95% CI, 0.16, 2.27). Isovolumic relaxation time was reduced by 14.7 msec (95% CI, -22.5, -6.9), a change not explained by the very small (and not significant) changes in systemic arterial pressure, heart rate, or cardiac output. There was no change in systolic and diastolic LV volume, nor in LV ejection fraction. Exercise capacity was greater by 12 watts (95% CI, 0.8, 23.3) in patients receiving nisoldipine, while the incidence of > or = 1 mm ST-segment depression (relative occurrence 0.54, 95% CI, 0.30-0.97) and the incidence of angina pectoris (relative occurrence 0.67, 95% CI, 0.42-1.08) during exercise testing tended to be lower in this group. Although the relations were not exact, peak exercise workload 7 weeks after infarction correlated with resting measurements of diastolic LV function. Exercise workload was inversely related to peak late diastolic transmitral blood flow velocity (A wave, slope, -86.6; 95% CI, -120.9, -52.2) and directly to the E/A ratio (slope, 20.5, 95% CI, 6.0, 35.1). The relations between exercise workload and peak late diastolic flow velocity remained significant after correction for age, sex, resting heart rate, and usage of beta-blocking drugs or nisoldipine. Exercise capacity was not related to measurements of systolic LV function (LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, stroke volume, cardiac index). In summary, the calcium channel blocker nisoldipine improved measurements of diastolic LV function in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction. Exercise capacity was higher in patients receiving the drug, and there was less exercise induced ischemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Neurohormones in patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction

Measurements of plasma neurohormones in patients with left ventricular dysfunction are generally performed for research purpose rather than for diagnostic purpose or to guide therapy. These studies have shown that in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, several neurohormonal systems were activated, even in the absence of symptoms of congestive heart failure. This suggested that the cardiovascular system was not in a steady state and pointed out potential culprits for the progression of the disease. It has also been shown that the levels of several of these markers, particularly plasma norepinephrine, had an important prognostic value. Another value of neurohormonal studies obviously is the design of new therapeutic approaches aimed at improving symptoms and prognosis. In this respect, important therapeutic successes have been obtained with agents that interfere with the actions of some of these neurohormonal systems, such as with the use of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, particularly captopril and enalapril, and to a lesser extent, with beta-blockers. It can therefore be expected that, in the future, most patients with severe ischemic dysfunction will be treated with an ACE inhibitor. Nonetheless, neurohormonal control is not complete with these drugs; powerful vasoconstrictor forces, such as endothelin-1, remain activated, and an escape of angiotensin II from the control of ACE inhibition may exist. Thus, morbidity (e.g., progression towards congestive heart failure and angina pectoris) and mortality remain high despite treatment with ACE inhibitors. In the search for future improvements, the new generation of long-acting dihydropyridines is worth considering. Their afterload reducing action, coupled with powerful coronary vasodilation, might hypothetically delay the progression of ischemic LV dysfunction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Medical advances in the treatment of congestive heart failure

The increased incidence and prevalence of congestive heart failure place a high priority on novel treatment strategies. Left ventricular ejection fraction remains the single most valuable measurement providing both diagnostic and prognostic insights. The most systematic approach to heart failure involves an objective assessment of functional disability, to include exercise tests such as a 6-minute walk under standardized conditions. Left ventricular dysfunction incites a host of neurohumoral compensations that are of fundamental importance in the heart failure syndrome expression. Both vasoconstrictor and vasodilator neurohormones are stimulated and provide new therapeutic opportunities. The therapeutic approach to heart failure begins with a strong emphasis on prevention, patient education, and self-participation in therapy with respect to both its monitoring and adjustment. Diuretics remain a mainstay of therapy but, in the face of severe heart failure, may become ineffectual, requiring constant infusion of loop-active diuretics, combination diuretics, or diuretics in association with concomitant low-dose dopamine infusion. Vasodilator therapy has been an important advance: combination hydralazine and nitrate therapy was initially shown to be efficacious in improving survival, and more recently, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, in the form of enalapril, have shown incremental benefit on survival over this combination. Interestingly, there is now evidence from both SOLVD and SAVE to demonstrate an unexpected and, as yet, unexplained reduction in the frequency of both unstable angina and myocardial infarction. Although, on balance, the weight of evidence concerning the long-term efficacy of inotropic agents has been disappointing, especially as it relates to their unfavorable effects on survival, recent information on vesnarinone, an agent with a complex and diversified mechanism of action, suggests that with appropriate doses, improved symptoms and survival are possible. A substantial amount of new information from randomized placebo-controlled trials attests to the symptomatic relief, hemodynamic improvement, and gain in exercise performance achieved by digoxin. A long-term survival study is ongoing to assess its effects on mortality. beta-Blockers, especially metoprolol, appear beneficial in some patients with heart failure, possibly related to their reduction in sympathetic nervous activity and restoration of beta-receptor population, with resultant improved contractile performance, enhanced myocardial relaxation, and overall increase in cardiac efficiency. Based on available evidence, the best contemporary approach to treatment involves the use of ACE inhibitors coupled with diuretic therapy, either continuous or intermittent, to relieve central or peripheral congestion. The addition of digoxin or a hydralazine nitrate combination is a logical next step, with commencement of low-dose beta-blocker a reasonable option.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Calcium channel blockers in heart failure

The rationale for the use of calcium channel blockers in patients with chronic heart failure lies in their vasodilator action, antiischemic effect, ability to lessen left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and data showing their effect in preventing progression of myocardial dysfunction in animals with cardiomyopathy. Despite initial studies reporting improvement of the hemodynamic profile with nifedipine, further evaluation showed variable results, with hemodynamic worsening seen in up to 29% of patients. Longer-term controlled studies evaluating symptoms and clinical status demonstrated worsening chronic heart failure in approximately 25% of patients within 8 weeks of nifedipine therapy. Although diltiazem has a lesser myocardial depressant effect and its short-term use was associated with less frequent hemodynamic and clinical worsening, long-term exposure to the drug in a large group of patients with chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction resulted in an increased incidence of cardiac events, with worsening heart failure and death. The use of verapamil in a similar patient cohort showed the loss of its demonstrated protective effect in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure. In an attempt to improve the safety of calcium channel blockers, the following approaches were suggested: 1) use of second-generation drugs with less myocardial depressant effect; 2) concomitant use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors to prevent reported neurohormonal activation; and 3) development of drugs with favorable neurohormonal effects. These approaches led to mixed results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy of flosequinan in patients with chronic heart failure. Principal Investigators of the REFLECT Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of flosequinan in chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND

Flosequinan is a new vasodilator drug that acts by interfering with the inositol-triphosphate/protein kinase C pathway, an important mechanism of vasoconstriction. The drug dilates both peripheral arteries and veins, is orally active and has a long duration of action that permits once-daily dosing. Previous studies have shown that flosequinan produces sustained hemodynamic benefits in heart failure, but large scale studies evaluating its clinical efficacy have not been reported.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-three patients with chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class II or III and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%) receiving digoxin and diuretic drugs were randomly assigned (double-blind) to the addition of flosequinan (100 mg once daily, n = 93) or placebo (n = 100) for 3 months. The clinical status and exercise tolerance of each patient was evaluated at the start of the study and every 2 to 4 weeks during the trial while background therapy remained constant.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, maximal treadmill exercise time increased by 96 s in the flosequinan group but by only 47 s in the placebo group (p = 0.022 for the difference between groups). Maximal oxygen consumption increased by 1.7 ml/kg per min in the flosequinan group (n = 17) but by only 0.6 ml/kg per min in the placebo group (n = 23), p = 0.05 between the groups. Symptomatically, 55% of patients receiving flosequinan but only 36% of patients receiving placebo benefited from treatment (p = 0.018). In addition, fewer patients treated with flosequinan had sufficiently severe worsening of heart failure to require a change in medication or withdrawal from the study (p = 0.07). By intention to treat, seven patients in the flosequinan group and two patients in the placebo group died.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that flosequinan is an effective drug for patients with chronic heart failure who remain symptomatic despite treatment with digoxin and diuretic drugs. The effect of the drug on survival remains to be determined.

Acute and chronic effects of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nisoldipine on the resting and exercise hemodynamics, neurohumoral parameters, and functional capacity of patients with chronic heart failure

The acute and chronic effects of the dihydropyridine calcium antagonist nisoldipine were studied in patients with chronic heart failure (LV EF < .35; peak VO2 < 25 ml/kg/min) caused by idiopathic or postinfarction cardiomyopathy. The study group initially consisted of 16 patients; two patients were excluded from the acute study due to side effects of the drug and two more patients were excluded during the chronic part of the study because of excessive tachycardia or worsening heart failure, respectively; therefore, the final study group consisted of 12 patients. Each patient was evaluated at rest, in the supine and sitting positions, and during maximal bicycle exercise, before and after acute and chronic (2-3 months) oral nisoldipine therapy (20 mg bid). Plasma levels of renin activity, aldosterone, norepinephrine, and epinephrine were measured before and 1 hour after nisoldipine in 10 patients. Concomitant therapy with digitalis and diuretics was kept constant throughout the study. At rest, in the supine position, nisoldipine (20 mg orally) induced an acute increase of cardiac index from 2.87 +/- 0.52 to 3.93 +/- 1.52 l/min/m2, with a reduction of mean arterial pressure from 97 +/- 7 to 85 +/- 9 mmHg and systemic vascular resistance from 1417 +/- 201 to 968 +/- 257 dynes sec/sec cm5 without significant changes of right atrial and pulmonary pressures. Hemodynamic effects peaked 1 hour after its administration and persisted for 6 hours. Similar changes were observed in the resting sitting position.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nisoldipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker

Nisoldipine is a new calcium-channel blocker of the dihydropyridine subclass, with a chemical structure similar to nifedipine. It has been used in clinical trials to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with hypertension, angina pectoris, and congestive heart failure. Similar to other dihydropyridines, nisoldipine is a potent peripheral and coronary dilator. The most optimal dosage regimen has not been established in clinical trials. The drug appears to have a favorable side-effect profile.

Efficacy and safety of calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients with concomitant left ventricular dysfunction

The use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in the treatment of hypertension and concomitant left ventricular dysfunction is reviewed. Some CCBs, particularly second-generation dihydropyridine agents such as felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, nimodipine, and nitrendipine, have properties that enhance their usefulness in these patients. All CCBs have a similar mechanism of action. Differences in their selective action at various tissue sites determine which are most appropriate for patients with concomitant hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction. Most CCBs do not produce reflex stimulation of the heart or induce intravascular expansion. While all CCBs produce arteriolar dilation, all local beds and regional circulations in target organs are not affected equally. Most CCBs can decrease cardiac mass, and second-generation CCBs tend to have little or no negative inotropic effects at therapeutic dosages. In addition, they increase blood flow and reduce myocardial oxygen requirements. Because of differences in functional and electrophysiologic effects, specific CCBs may not be appropriate for all patients. Since second-generation dihydropyridine CCBs lack clinically relevant negative inotropic effects, and have been shown to improve exercise tolerance and coronary artery perfusion, they are appropriate for hypertensive patients with left ventricular dysfunction, angina, and coronary heart disease. Second-generation CCBs tend to lack cardiodepressant side effects and are less likely to react with digoxin than are first-generation CCBs.