Prognostic value of dobutamine echocardiography early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction: a comparison with exercise electrocardiography

Diagnostic Performance of On-Site Computed Tomography Derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Non-Culprit Coronary Lesions in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

The role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in the assessment of non-culprit lesions (NCL) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is debated. In this prospective clinical study, a total of 68 ACS patients with 89 moderate (30−70% diameter stenosis) NCLs were enrolled to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of on-site CT-FFR compared to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRi) and dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) as reference standards. CT-FFR and FFRi values ≤0.80, as well as new or worsening wall motion abnormality in ≥2 contiguous segments on the supplying area of an NCL on DSE, were considered positive for ischemia. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive value of CT-FFR relative to FFRi and DSE were 51%, 89%, 75%, and 74% and 37%, 77%, 42%, and 74%, respectively. CT-FFR value (β = 0.334, p < 0.001) and CT-FFR drop from proximal to distal measuring point [(CT-FFR drop), β = −0.289, p = 0.002)] were independent predictors of FFRi value in multivariate linear regression analysis. Based on comparing their receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (AUC) values, CT-FFR value and CT-FFR drop provided better discriminatory power than CCTA-based minimal lumen diameter stenosis to distinguish between an NCL with positive and negative FFRi [0.77 (95% Confidence Intervals, CI: 0.67−0.86) and 0.77 (CI: 0.67−0.86) vs. 0.63 (CI: 0.52−0.73), p = 0.029 and p = 0.043, respectively]. Neither CT-FFR value nor CT-FFR drop was predictive of regional wall motion score index at peak stress (β = −0.440, p = 0.441 and β = 0.403, p = 0.494) or was able to confirm ischemia on the territory of an NCL revealed by DSE (AUC = 0.54, CI: 0.43−0.64 and AUC = 0.55, CI: 0.44−0.65, respectively). In conclusion, on-site CT-FFR is superior to conventional CCTA-based anatomical analysis in the assessment of moderate NCLs; however, its diagnostic capacity is not sufficient to make it a gatekeeper to invasive functional evaluation. Moreover, based on its comparison with DSE, CT-FFR might not yield any information on the microvascular dysfunction in the territory of an NCL.

Patients with Moderate Non-Culprit Coronary Lesions of Recent Acute Coronary Syndrome

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement was compared to dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) instable angina (SA) with stable coronary lesion (s) (SCL (s) ) in a few trials; however, similar comparisons in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with non-culprit lesion (s) (NCL (s) ) are lacking. Our objectives were to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of FFR with two different cutoff values (< 0.80 and < 0.75) relative to DSE in moderate (30%-70% diameter stenosis) NCLs (ACS group) and to compare these observations with those measured in SCLs (SA group). One hundred seventy-five consecutive patients with SA (n = 86) and ACS (n = 89) with 225 coronary lesions (109 SCLs and 116 NCLs) were enrolled. In contrast to the ACS cohort in SA patients, normal DSE was associated with higher FFR values compared to those with abnormal DSE (P = 0.051 versus P = 0.006). In addition, in the SA group, a significant correlation was observed between DSE (regional wall motion score index at peak stress) and FFR (r = -0.290; P = 0.002), whereas a similar association was absent (r = -0.029; P = 0.760) among ACS patients. In the SA group, decreasing the FFR cutoff value (< 0.80 versus < 0.75) improved the concordance of FFR with DSE (70.6% versus 81.7%) without altering its discriminatory power (area under the curve; 0.68 versus 0.63; P = 0.369), whereas in the ACS group, concordance remained similar (69.0% versus 71.6%) and discriminatory power decreased (0.62 versus 0.51; P = 0.049), respectively. In conclusion, lesion-specific FFR assessment may have different relevance in patients with moderate NCLs than in patients with SCLs.

Imaging techniques in coronary atherosclerotic disease: dobutamine stress echocardiography--evidence and perspectives

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is the most widely disseminated noninvasive technique for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Its results are important for clinical decisions. It is a versatile technique with high sensitivity and specificity for detecting viable myocardium at jeopardy. More recently, strain rate imaging has been applied to stress echocardiography. This approach relies on tissue Doppler or two-dimensional strain imaging to quantify myocardial deformation. The application of contrast echocardiographic techniques to stress echocardiography enables left ventricular opacification for border enhancement and myocardial perfusion imaging. Thus, this application is not limited to stress echocardiography, but has utility whenever image quality adversely affects wall motion assessment. Recently, three-dimensional stress echocardiography imaging has been proposed as an alternative approach to assess myocardial ischemia.

Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC)

Stress echocardiography is the combination of 2D echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress. The diagnostic end point for the detection of myocardial ischemia is the induction of a transient worsening in regional function during stress. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. Among different stresses of comparable diagnostic and prognostic accuracy, semisupine exercise is the most used, dobutamine the best test for viability, and dipyridamole the safest and simplest pharmacological stress and the most suitable for combined wall motion coronary flow reserve assessment. The additional clinical benefit of myocardial perfusion contrast echocardiography and myocardial velocity imaging has been inconsistent to date, whereas the potential of adding - coronary flow reserve evaluation of left anterior descending coronary artery by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography adds another potentially important dimension to stress echocardiography. New emerging fields of application taking advantage from the versatility of the technique are Doppler stress echo in valvular heart disease and in dilated cardiomyopathy. In spite of its dependence upon operator's training, stress echocardiography is today the best (most cost-effective and risk-effective) possible imaging choice to achieve the still elusive target of sustainable cardiac imaging in the field of noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Predischarge exercise electrocardiogram and stress echocardiography can predict long-term clinically driven revascularization following acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Predischarge stress testing provides suboptimal prediction of spontaneous hard events following uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

HYPOTHESIS

This study was aimed at assessing whether soft cardiac ischemic events requiring late revascularization could be predicted more accurately.

METHODS

In all, 428 patients undergoing exercise electrocardiography (ECG) and stress echocardiography (SE, 345 dobutamine and 83 dypiridamole) within 15 days of uncomplicated AMI were followed up for 425 (range 20-2220) days. Soft ischemic events (effort angina>class II [Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification] and unstable angina) driving late (>6 months) revascularization were regarded as endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 58 events (29 effort and 29 unstable angina with subsequent 47 coronary artery bypass grafts and 11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasties) occurred: 26 in patients with positive exercise ECG and 34 in patients with positive SE. Univariate predictors of revascularizations were positive exercise ECG (p = 0.0001), peak wall motion score index (WMSI) (p = 0.0009), low workload (p = 0.0018), rest WMSI (p = 0.02) and positive SE (p = 0.02). Cox multivariate analysis selected peak WMSI, positive exercise ECG, and low workload positive exercise ECG as independent predictors of late revascularizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Predischarge stress testing identifies the long-term occurrence of soft ischemic events driving late revascularization after uncomplicated AMI.

The use of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease: an overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Stress echocardiography has a high accuracy for the detection of coronary artery disease. Additionally, it provides clinically useful prognostic information, such as resting left ventricular function, myocardial viability, stress-induced ischemia, vascular extent of wall motion abnormalities, and changes in end-systolic volume and ejection fraction with stress.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

The timing, extent, and severity of the stress-induced wall motion abnormalities are important determinants of long-term prognosis. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of stress echocardiography in predicting long-term cardiac events in mixed patient groups and the value of this test in selected patient subsets.

SUMMARY

This review attempts to define the role of stress echocardiography for prognostication in coronary artery disease, pointing out the ability of this technique to identify low-risk and high-risk subsets among patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease and thus guide patient management decisions.

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with previous coronary revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with previous myocardial revascularisation.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral centre in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

PATIENTS

332 consecutive patients with previous percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation underwent DSE. Follow up was successful for 331 (99.7%) patients. Thirty eight patients who underwent early revascularisation (<or= 3 months) after the test were excluded from analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify independent predictors of the composite of cardiac events (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and late revascularisation).

RESULTS

During a mean (SD) of 24 (20) months, 37 (13%) patients died and 89 (30%) had at least one cardiac event (21 (7%) cardiac deaths, 11 (4%) non-fatal myocardial infarctions, and 68 (23%) late revascularisations). In multivariate analysis of clinical data, independent predictors of late cardiac events were hypertension (hazard ratio (HR) 1.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 2.6) and congestive heart failure (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.2). Reversible wall motion abnormalities (ischaemia) on DSE were incrementally predictive of cardiac events (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial ischaemia during DSE is independently predictive of cardiac events among patients with previous myocardial revascularisation, after controlling for clinical data.

[Predictive significance of residual ischemia detected by the dobutamine stress-echocardiography test soon after the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction]

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term prognostic value of dobutamine stress-echocardiography (ECG) test for new coronary events (new episodes of angina pectoris, cardiac-related deaths, and reinfarctions) early after the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Dobutamine stress-echocardiography tests were performed in all of 104 patients 10-20 days after the first myocardial infarction. Patients were followed-up for 36 (29 +/- 7) months. Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curves were tested by Breslow test (Log Rank).

RESULTS

Two cardiac deaths (1.92%), nine nonfatal myocardial infarctions (8.65%), and three cases of recurrent angina pectoris (2.88%) occurred during the prospective follow-up. Cumulative survival curves showed that in patients with negative findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test, survival time without significant events was 35.31 months, while in the group with positive findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test it was 30.91 months (log Rank 7.22; p<0.01). Prognostic value of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test was analyzed by Cox regression model and was 2.92, meaning that the risk of significant events was 2.92 times higher in the group of patients with positive findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test.

CONCLUSION

Patients with negative findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test were with significantly higher possibility of surviving without significant events in comparison with the patients in whom the findings of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test were positive. In combination with clinical signs and ECG results, the results of dobutamine stress-echocardiography test improved prognostic value in the patients with the first uncomplicated myocardial infarction, and in that way influenced the strategy of their further treatment.

Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging detects more residual ischemia than stress echocardiography following acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This investigation sought to compare the abilities of stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography to detect residual ischemia in patients following acute myocardial infarction (MI).

BACKGROUND

Stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography are both commonly used to assess patients (patients.) in the immediate post MI period. However, the relative value of these techniques in identifying post MI ischemia remains unclear.

METHODS

Eighteen patients. underwent both dipyridamole radionuclide perfusion imaging and dobutamine stress echocardiography on the same day or on consecutive days, 3-7 days following uncomplicated acute MI. Pts. who had an acute percutaneous intervention were excluded. Images were reviewed with clinical information available, but blinded to the opposing modality, for perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities (WMA), and evidence of ischemia (reversible defect(s) on perfusion imaging, worsening WMA on stress echocardiography). Of the 18 patients, 11 subsequently underwent cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

Perfusion imaging identified defects in 16 (89%) patients, of whom 15 (83% of total) were found to be ischemic. Stress echocardiography identified a fixed wall motion abnormality in 17 (94%) and ischemia in 8 (44%, p < 0.05 compared with perfusion imaging ischemia). Among 11 patients who underwent catheterization, there was a trend towards perfusion imaging identifying more ischemia in the territory of an obstructed (> or = 70%) vessel--100% (11/11) vs. 64% (7/11) for stress echocardiography (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

In the immediate post-infarction period, dipyridamole stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging more often shows evidence of residual ischemia than dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Age-related determinants of outcome after acute myocardial infarction: a dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the cause of worse survival in older patients after myocardial infarction (MI).

DESIGN

Prospective 18-month and longer follow-up study of a cohort of 167 patients (mean age +/- standard deviation 58 +/- 12, including 71 aged >or=65) with acute MI for cardiac events, defined as cardiac death, recurrent MI, or resuscitated ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF).

SETTING

Milwaukee County Medical Complex and the Zablocki Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred sixty-seven patients who underwent dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) in the first week (2-7 days) after acute MI and were medically managed.

MEASUREMENTS

Comparison of event rates in older (>or=65 years) and younger (<65 years) patients and of clinical, resting echocardiographic, DASE, and angiographic findings in patients with and without events. Coronary angiography was performed in 141.

RESULTS

Older and younger patients tolerated DASE well. During follow-up, there were 29 cardiac events (cardiac death in 17, nonfatal MI in 10, and VT/VF in 2). Events were more common in older patients (26% vs 12%, P <.05), especially death (19% vs 5%, P <.05). Scar size in the infarct zone by DASE was larger (4.0 +/- 2.8 vs 3.0 +/- 2.7 segments, P <.05) and remote wall motion abnormalities more common (47 vs 29%, P <.05) in older patients. Univariate determinants of outcome (P <.05) in older patients were diabetes mellitus; remote wall motion abnormalities; angiographic multivessel disease; scar size; ejection fraction; and resting, low-, and peak-dose wall motion score. Univariate determinants in younger patients were similar, but diabetes mellitus was not. Multivariate analysis revealed that remote wall motion abnormalities and scar size by DASE were independently predictive of outcome in older and younger patients and diabetes mellitus only in older patients. Low- and peak-dose DASE data enhanced (P <.01) the prediction of outcome in all patients with acute MI relative to clinical data and resting echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

DASE was more predictive of outcome than clinical data and resting echocardiography in both age groups. Scar size and remote wall motion abnormalities were the primary determinants of outcome irrespective of age. The worse prognosis of older patients correlated with diabetes mellitus, greater scar size, and higher incidence of remote inducible ischemia.

Identification of hemodynamically significant restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction by transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography and comparison with myocardial single photon emission computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Beside thrombolysis, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has become a well-established treatment for acute myocardial infarction. However, restenosis occurs in approximately 15%-40% of patients. Despite a frequently occurring infarct-related regional systolic dysfunction at rest, the identification of hemodynamically relevant restenosis seems important in terms of risk stratification, adequate treatment, and possible improvement of prognosis in these patients. This study was designed to assess the role of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography and myocardial scintigraphy for identification of hemodynamically significant restenosis after PTCA for acute myocardial infarction.

METHODS

Multiplane transesophageal stress echocardiography (dobutamine 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 micrograms/kg per min) studies and myocardial single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) studies were performed in 40 patients, all of whom underwent PTCA in the setting of acute myocardial infarction > or = 4 months prior to the test. Repeated coronary angiography was performed in all study patients who showed stress-induced perfusion defects or wall-motion abnormalities, or both.

RESULTS

Significant restenosis (> or = 50%) was angiographically found in 15 (37.5%) of 40 patients. Of these 15 patients, transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography identified restenosis in 12 (80%) and myocardial SPECT in 14 (93%), yielding diagnostic agreement in 70% of patients. Echocardiographic detection of restenosis was based mainly on a biphasic response to increasing doses of dobutamine. Sensitivity and specificity for identification of hemodynamically relevant restenosis in individual patients was 80% and 92%, respectively for dobutamine stress echocardiography versus 93% and 68% for myocardial SPECT.

CONCLUSIONS

Both transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography and myocardial SPECT were highly sensitive in identifying significant restenosis after PTCA for acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, either test, as a single diagnostic tool or especially if performed together, are clinically valuable alternatives to coronary angiography for the detection of restenosis after PTCA for acute myocardial infarction.

Incremental prognostic value of stress echocardiography as an adjunct to exercise electrocardiography after uncomplicated myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of stress echocardiography as an adjunct to exercise electrocardiography in patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

DESIGN

496 patients underwent a maximum exercise ECG and pharmacological stress echocardiography (406 dobutamine and 90 dipyridamole) within 15 days of uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction and were followed for a mean of 25 months (range 1-74 months) for reinfarction, unstable angina, and cardiac death. Patients undergoing revascularisation were omitted.

RESULTS

Exercise ECG was positive in 162 patients (32.6%) and low threshold positive (< 100 W) in 91 (18%). Stress echocardiography was positive in 239 patients (48%) (194 with dobutamine and 45 with dipyridamole stress). The agreement between the two tests was 63% (kappa = 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 0.33). Sixty nine spontaneous events occurred (14 cardiac deaths, 26 reinfarctions, and 29 with unstable angina requiring hospital admission), and 126 patients underwent revascularisation (39 coronary angioplasty and 87 bypass surgery). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, stress echocardiography provided incremental prognostic information compared with clinical data. A low threshold positive exercise ECG was associated with a worse outcome, but there was a fivefold increase in risk in patients with positive stress echocardiography who also had a high threshold (> 100 W) positive exercise ECG. Event-free survival of patients with both tests positive was significantly less than in patients with only one positive test or with both tests negative.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress echocardiography provides additional prognostic information after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction, but the greatest gain is found in patients with a high threshold positive exercise ECG.

Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging versus stress echocardiography: prognostic comparisons

The use of noninvasive stress cardiac imaging for stratifying risk in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease is growing as a tool for identification of the subgroup most likely to benefit from the expense and risk of more invasive procedures, including cardiac catheterization and coronary revascularization. In this setting, it is especially important that a test be able to identify patients with sufficiently low risk that clinicians are comfortable in deferring such interventions, especially in those with other markers of increased risk. Previous data have shown that cardiac risk is most closely related to the presence and extent of jeopardized viable myocardium on noninvasive stress cardiac imaging. Although stress echocardiography may have comparable ability to detect coronary artery disease, current data suggest that stress echocardiography detects significantly less jeopardized viable myocardium than stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging and consequently fewer patients at risk for cardiac events. Stress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging may therefore have important advantages for risk stratification and the direction of future care of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Diagnostic and prognostic use of stress echocardiography in stable patients

Stress echocardiography is an effective diagnostic and prognostic technique in stable patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction, or chronic left ventricular dysfunction and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Stress echocardiography is sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events regardless of the clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Stress echocardiography provides incremental prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable to that from radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for one-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Prognostic value of negative transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography in men at high risk for coronary artery disease

Recently published reviews have called into question the sensitvity of transthoracic stress echocardiography to predict cardiac events, especially when the test is negative, compared with myocardial perfusion imaging studies. To our knowledge there are a lack of data assessing the prognostic value of transesophageal echocardiography-dobutamine stress echocardiography (TEE-DSE) in predicting cardiac events. Because TEE-DSE has been reported to be highly accurate for detecting ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, we tested the hypothesis that a negative TEE-DSE can identify a low-risk group in a population with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease. Between October 1996 and December 1997, 46 high-risk patients with negative TEE-DSE were identified. Annualized pretest risk for all cardiac events using the Framingham model was 4% based on risk factors. Mean age was 64 years. Mean follow-up time was 16.2 months. There were no cardiac deaths. There were 6 soft and 1 hard cardiac event. The annualized combined ischemic cardiac event rate was 3.8%, and for hard cardiac events it was 1.1%. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, 97% of the population remained free of any ischemic event at the end of 1 year and 93% were free at 22 months. We conclude that optimal image quality and enhanced endocardial definition for assessing wall motion changes with TEE translates into better prognostication and approaches that of myocardial perfusion imaging for negative studies. Advances in ultrasound medicine such as contrast enhancement of myocardial definition, which improve diagnostic accuracy of DSE, should translate into better prognostication.

Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era

Historically, risk stratification for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has centered on 3 principles: assessment of left ventricular function, detection of residual myocardial ischemia, and estimation of the risk for sudden cardiac death. Although these factors still have important prognostic implications for these patients, our ability to predict adverse cardiac events has significantly improved over the last several years. Recent studies have identified powerful predictors of adverse cardiac events available from the patient history, physical examination, initial electrocardiogram, and blood testing early in the evaluation of patients with AMI. Numerous studies performed in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy with either thrombolysis or primary angioplasty have emphasized the importance of a patent infarct related artery for long-term survival. The predictive value of a variety of noninvasive and invasive tests to predict myocardial electrical instability have been under active investigation in patients receiving early reperfusion therapy. The current understanding of the clinically important predictors of clinical outcomes in survivors of AMI is reviewed in this article.

Can dobutamine stress echocardiography predict cardiac events in nonrevascularized diabetic patients following acute myocardial infarction?

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) performed early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is as high in diabetic patients as in nondiabetic patients.

DESIGN

Inception cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary cardiac referral center.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTIONS

Three hundred thirty-eight patients (116 diabetic and 222 nondiabetic) who underwent DSE after AMI were followed up for cardiac events.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Outcome events were as follows: "hard" events consisted of cardiac death and nonfatal reinfarction, while "all events" included hard events and unstable angina. The mean follow-up duration was 21 +/- 9 months. DSE results were positive in 69 diabetic patients (59.5%) and 129 nondiabetic patients (58.1%; p = 0.817). During the follow-up period, there were 25 cardiac deaths, 16 cases of nonfatal reinfarction, and 55 cases of unstable angina. The Kaplan-Meier life table showed that a positive DSE result was associated with a lower event-free survival rate in nondiabetic but not in diabetic patients in terms of hard and all events. By multivariate analysis, a positive DSE result was the strongest independent predictor of future cardiac events in nondiabetic patients. However, in diabetics, a shorter dobutamine time, rather than a positive DSE result, independently predicted cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preliminary data suggest that different DSE variables should be considered when assessing the likelihood of future events in diabetic and nondiabetic patients after AMI. The observation of shorter dobutamine time, instead of DSE positivity, has a higher prognostic value in diabetics. In diabetic patients, the only significant role of DSE positivity is for predicting future unstable angina; however, its predictive value is not as good as in nondiabetic patients.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Use of Stress Echocardiography and Radionuclide Scintigraphy

Stress echocardiography and radionuclide scintigraphy are effective diagnostic and prognostic techniques in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), chronic left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), and those undergoing noncardiac surgery. Both are sensitive and specific for the detection and extent of CAD. Negative tests confer a high negative predictive value for cardiac events irrespective of clinical risk. Positive studies confer a high positive predictive value for ischemic events in patients with intermediate to high clinical risk. Both provide incremental diagnostic and prognostic information relative to clinical, resting echocardiographic, and angiographic data. Meta-analysis studies have shown that the diagnostic and prognostic information provided by stress echocardiography is comparable with radionuclide scintigraphic stress tests. Stress echocardiography may be more specific for the detection and extent of CAD, whereas radionuclide scintigraphy may be more sensitive for single-vessel disease. Sensitivities are similar for the detection and extent of disease in patients with multivessel CAD.

Stress myocardial perfusion imaging versus echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

Stress perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography (ECHO) are both very useful for assessment of diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Both techniques have been well validated during exercise and inotropic stress, but coronary vasodilation stress is better used in combination with perfusion imaging. The overall sensitivity for detection of CAD is slightly higher by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) than by two-dimensional (2D) ECHO during all stress modalities, whereas the specificity is slightly higher by ECHO, although the differences in general are not statistically significant. SPECT, however, appears to be superior to ECHO in the diagnosis of isolated circumflex stenosis, as well as for the correct identification of multivessel CAD. A substantially greater amount of information is available regarding risk stratification with SPECT than with 2D ECHO. Although the data suggest that both techniques are very useful for risk stratification of patients with stable CAD, after myocardial infarction, and for preoperative risk stratification, the risk for cardiac events is lower in the presence of a normal stress SPECT study than of a normal stress ECHO.

Stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography for risk stratification after non-Q-wave uncomplicated myocardial infarction

The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic value of stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography after uncomplicated non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction in a series of 68 consecutive patients. Our data show that stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography offer similar prognostic information after uncomplicated non-Q-wave AMI.

Prediction of cardiac events after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction by clinical variables and dobutamine stress test

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the relative prognostic power of several clinical and dobutamine stress test variables in patients after a first uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

The value of dobutamine echocardiography (DE) for determining prognosis after AMI is not yet defined. In particular, the influence of dobutamine stress test response on the outcome of these patients is unknown.

METHODS

A graded predischarge DE (from 5 to 40 microg/kg/min, plus atropine if needed) was performed in 245 patients (mean age 60 +/- 10 years) with a first uncomplicated AMI.

RESULTS

At follow-up (17 +/- 13 months), an adverse outcome occurred in 40 patients: cardiac death in 7, nonfatal myocardial infarction in 9 (hard events = 16) and unstable angina requiring hospital readmission in 24. Significant predictors of adverse outcome by univariate analysis were positive DE, ischemic wall motion score index (WMSI), angina during DE and diabetes for all events, and positive DE, ischemic WMSI and age for hard events. At multivariate analysis, the only independent predictors of adverse outcome were positive DE, diabetes and angina during DE for all events, and positive DE and age for hard events. The presence of both age >60 years and a history of diabetes identified patients at high risk of cardiac events (event rate 37%), compared with patients <60 years and no diabetes (event rate 11%). In patients with intermediate risk (only one clinical risk factor, event rate 18%), DE added prognostic information (event rate 10% in the negatives, 25% in the positives and 35% in the positives with angina).

CONCLUSIONS

After uncomplicated AMI, dobutamine stress test variables offer additional prognostic information to clinical data.

Use of stress echocardiography for risk assessment of patients after myocardial infarction

The main predictors of outcome after infarction (exercise capacity, ejection fraction, and extent of jeopardized myocardium) can all be identified using stress echocardiography. This review addresses the place of stress echocardiography in postinfarct risk evaluation, relative to clinical evaluation, and other technologies. The test is accurate for identification of multivessel disease and for predicting outcomes, is versatile, and can be used early after infarction.

Prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting cardiac events in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The study sought to determine the utility of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in predicting cardiac events in the year after testing.

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, DSE has been applied to risk stratification of patients.

METHODS

Medical records of 1,183 consecutive patients who underwent DSE were reviewed. The cardiac events that occurred during the 12 months after DSE were tabulated: myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), and coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Patient exclusions included organ transplant receipt or evaluation, recent PTCA, noncardiac death, and lack of follow-up. A positive stress echocardiogram (SE) was defined as new or worsened wall-motion abnormalities (WMAs) consistent with ischemia during DSE. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis identified variables that best predicted future cardiac events.

RESULTS

The average age was 68+/-12 years, with 338 women and 220 men. The overall cardiac event rate was 34% if SE was positive, and 10% if it was negative. The event rates for MI and death were 10% and 8%, respectively, if SE was positive, and 3% and 3%, respectively, if SE was negative. If an ischemic electrocardiogram (ECG) and a positive SE were present, the overall event rate was 42%, versus a 7% rate when ECG and SE were negative for ischemia. Rest WMA was the most useful variable in predicting future cardiac events using CART: 25% of patients with and 6% without a rest WMA had an event. Other important variables were a dobutamine EF <52.5%, a positive SE, an ischemic ECG response, history of hypertension and age.

CONCLUSIONS

A positive SE provides useful prognostic information that is enhanced by also considering rest-wall motion, stress ECG response, and dobutamine EF.

Quantitative analysis of myocardial response to dobutamine by measurement of left ventricular wall motion using omnidirectional M-mode echocardiography

Although dobutamine stress echocardiography is important for assessing cardiac ischemia and viability, analysis of wall motion is qualitatively performed. We quantitatively evaluated left ventricular wall motion using a newly developed omnidirectional M-mode echocardiography that can depict the M-mode at the site of region of interest on the 2-dimensional image in real time, and established its usefulness for analyzing the myocardial response to dobutamine infusion. Dobutamine stress echocardiography with omnidirectional M-mode was performed in 57 patients with coronary lesions. In 38 of these patients, exercise stress single-photon emission computed tomographic thallium scintigraphy (Tl-201 SPECT) was performed. Endocardial excursion of 103 regions was measured from omnidirectional M-mode at baseline, low-dose (6 microg/kg/min), and at peak dose (30 microg/kg/min) dobutamine. A decrease and increase in wall excursion was scored (from -3 to 3) for a changes of every 2 mm, and a quantitative wall motion score (QWMS) was calculated as a summation of the scores from baseline to low dose and from low to peak doses. Quantitative coronary stenosis score (QCSS) was calculated as a summation of stenotic and collateral scores. The stenosis scores were graded as: 1 = 0% to 50%, 2 = 50% to 75%, 3 = 75% to 90%, 4 = 90% to 95%, 5 = 95% to 100%; collateral scores were graded as: -1 = poor collateral, -2 = good collateral. Based on the QWMS at each dose of dobutamine, the serial changes in wall motion were divided into 4 groups: augmented, biphasic, no change, and worsening. The QCSS was clearly different among these groups. QWMS was significantly correlated with QCSS (r = 0.657, p <0.001). The incidence of redistribution in Tl-201 SPECT was high in the region with low score of QWMS. In conclusion, omnidirectional M-mode is useful for quantitatively determining the grade of cardiac ischemia by assessing the serial change of ventricular wall motion during dobutamine infusion.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography in the prediction of acute or chronic myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

We assessed the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in predicting cardiac events in patients with acute or chronic myocardial infarction (MI), and we studied the association between DSE and these events.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-six patients (mean [+/-SD] age 65.3 +/- 11.4 years) with acute (n = 139) or chronic (n = 127) MI were recruited from March 1995 through April 1997. Both groups underwent DSE and were followed up for an average of 14.1 +/- 8.0 months. DSE was positive in 111 (79.9%) patients with acute MI and 65 (51.2%) patients with chronic MI (P <.0001 ). Positive DSE results were associated with a higher rate of all cardiac events (cardiac mortality rate, reinfarction, and unstable angina) than negative DSE results in both patients with acute MI and patients with chronic MI (44 in 111 patients vs 6 in 28 patients, P =.052, and 31 in 65 patients vs 10 in 62 patients, P <.0001, respectively). Among patients with acute MI, the positive and negative predictive values of DSE for all cardiac events were 39.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30.5% to 48. 7%) and 78.6% (95% CI 63.4% to 93.8%), respectively. In chronic MI, the positive and negative predictive values were 47.7% (95% CI 35.5% to 59.8%) and 83.9% (95% CI 74.7% to 93.0%), respectively. In both acute (P =.03) and chronic (P <.0001 ) MI, positive DSE findings were independent predictors of all cardiac events.

CONCLUSIONS

DSE is useful for predicting cardiac events. A positive finding on DSE is an independent predictor of cardiac events after both acute and chronic MI, whereas a negative DSE result predicts a low likelihood of subsequent cardiac events.

Stress Echocardiography: A Review of the Principles and Practice

Stress echocardiography, both pharmacologic and physiological, is an established noninvasive diagnostic method of detecting coronary artery disease. It also has a role in the assessment of patients with chest pain, the assessment of cardiovascular risk before noncardiac surgery, the assessment of patients after a myocardial infarction, the detection of viability in dysfunctional myocardium, and the prediction of functional recovery. The prognostic value of stress echocardiography is emerging. In this article, we discuss the methodology, diagnostic accuracy, and various clinical applications of stress echocardiography. We also review its limitations and compared it with other noninvasive methods of assessing patients with coronary artery disease.

Prognostic value of myocardial viability and ischemia detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography early after acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the prognostic value of myocardial viability and ischemia detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND

DSE can detect myocardial viability and ischemia early after AMI, but the prognostic importance of viability and ischemia in these patients has yet to be assessed.

METHODS

DSE was performed in 152 patients at a mean of 9 +/- 5 days after a first AMI treated with thrombolysis to evaluate myocardial viability and ischemia. The patients were followed up for 15 +/- 19 months.

RESULTS

On the basis of DSE results three groups of patients were identified: group 1 (95 patients, 62.5%) with myocardial viability and ischemia, group 2 with myocardial viability without ischemia (32 patients, 21%) and group 3 (25 patients, 16.5%) with no myocardial viability. During follow-up 10 patients (6.5%) had hard events, 53 (35%) developed unstable angina and 67 (44%) underwent myocardial revascularization. The rate of hard events was 10% in group 1 and 0% in group 2 and 3 patients (p < 0.05 group 1 versus group 2); group 1 patients with viability and ischemia showed a significantly higher rate of recurrence of unstable angina and myocardial revascularization procedures (40% and 60%) compared to group 2 (22% and 16%) and group 3 patients (20% and 20%). Using the Cox multivariate stepwise model, only the extent of ischemic myocardium (hazard ratio (HR) = 21.7, p = 0.02) and angina during DSE (HR = 4.45, p = 0.03) were significant predictors of hard events; an ischemic response to DSE (HR = 2.92, p = 0.001) was the most important predictor of spontaneous events, followed by ST-segment depression during DSE (HR = 1.71, p = 0.04), angina during DSE (HR = 1.53, p = 0.19) and age (HR = 0.96, p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a first AMI treated with thrombolysis the presence and extent of myocardial ischemia during DSE is the most important predictor of both hard and spontaneous cardiac events, whereas myocardial viability does not have an independent prognostic value.

Dobutamine stress echocardiography for assessing coronary artery disease after transplantation in children

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for evaluating posttransplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) in children, and to determine the frequency of selected cardiac events after normal or abnormal DSE.

BACKGROUND

Posttransplant coronary artery disease is the most common cause of graft loss (late death or retransplantation) after cardiac transplantation (CTx) in children. Coronary angiography, routinely performed to screen for TxCAD, is an invasive procedure with limited sensitivity. The efficacy of DSE for detecting atherosclerotic coronary artery disease is established, but is unknown in children after CTx.

METHODS

Of the 78 children (median age 5.7 years, range 3 to 18) entered into the study, 72 (92%) underwent diagnostic DSE by means of a standard protocol, 4.6 +/- 1.9 years after CTx. The results of coronary angiography performed in 70 patients were compared with DSE findings. After DSE, subjects were monitored for TxCAD-related cardiac events, including death, retransplantation and new angiographic diagnosis of TxCAD.

RESULTS

No major complications occurred. Minor complications, most often hypertension, occurred in 11% of the 72 subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of DSE were 72% and 80%, respectively, when compared with coronary angiography. At follow-up (21 +/- 8 months), TxCAD-related cardiac events occurred in 2 of 50 children (4%) with negative DSE, versus 6 of 22 children (27%) with positive DSE (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DSE is a feasible, safe and accurate screening method for TxCAD in children. Positive DSE identifies patients at increased risk of TxCAD-related cardiac events. Negative DSE predicts short-term freedom from such events.

Prognostic value of dobutamine echocardiography in patients after Q-wave or non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction

We investigated the role of dobutamine echocardiography in predicting future spontaneous events in patients with Q-wave or non-Q-wave first acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DE was performed in 168 patients with a Q-wave AMI and 105 patients with a non-Q-wave AMI. Patients were observed for hard events (cardiac death and nonfatal reinfarction) and all spontaneous events (hard events and unstable angina). When compared to patients with a Q-wave AMI, patients with non-Q-wave AMI had a higher rate of positive dobutamine echocardiographic results (51.8% vs 80.0%, p <0.0001), greater changes in wall motion score index (WMSI) (0.31+/-0.17 vs 0.42+/-0.23, p = 0.001), and more remote zone ischemia (27.9% vs 43.8%, p = 0.0072). Patients with non-Q-wave infarct had a higher all-event rate, but a similar hard-event rate. In patients with a positive dobutamine echocardiogram (DE), the rate of hard or all events was similar, regardless of different infarct patterns. Patients with a negative DE had a higher event-free survival rate for all events in both Q-wave (85.2% vs 60.9%, p <0.0001) and non-Q-wave (76.2% vs 52.4%, p = 0.0083) groups. By stepwise analysis in the Q-wave group, the most important predictors were peak stress WMSI and diabetes for hard events, and a positive DE and baseline WMSI for all events. However, in the non-Q-wave group, the strongest predictors were dobutamine time for hard events and positive DE for all events. We conclude that a positive DE is a powerful predictor of future spontaneous events in patients after either a Q-wave or non-Q-wave AMI. However, for hard events, high-risk patients with different infarct patterns were recognized with variable efficiency by different dobutamine echocardiographic variables.

Clinical impact of echocardiography in prognostic stratification after acute myocardial infarction

Risk stratification is mandatory in the management of the postinfarction period. The identification of high-risk patients, on the basis of clinical data (recurrent angina, overt heart failure, etc.), is quite easy, whereas stratification of uncomplicated subjects needs an accurate noninvasive strategy. In the last 20 years, echocardiography has been gaining an increasing role, allowing increasingly precise evaluation of infarct size. This detection of the extent of infarct size has a definite prognostic value. Since 1980, we have observed that a dysfunctioning left ventricular myocardium >40% marked patients with a poor prognosis. These observations are most important in asymptomatic infarct patients, in whom clinical features may not reflect the amount of left ventricular dysfunction. Our recent results on a large series of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) without overt heart failure have shown that the extension of wall motion abnormalities at 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography was highly predictive of cardiac death or new coronary events in a 3-year follow-up (univariate analysis; p <0.0005). Echocardiography also plays an important role in detecting postinfarct ischemia, as seen by its wide use during stress tests. In our experience, the response to exercise echocardiographic testing has a high prognostic value. In fact, in our series, univariate analysis (Kaplan-Meier) showed that the best predictors of coronary events were the number of markers of ischemia during exercise (p <0.00001), the work load (p <0.00001), a positive exercise echo (p <0.0005), and the echo score at rest (p <0.0005). Multivariate analysis (Cox) confirmed these data: number of markers of ischemia: odds ratio (OR) 4.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.5-13.1; work load: OR 2.46, CI 1.3-4.5; positive exercise echo OR 1.88, CI 1.1-3.2. Thus, serial echocardiography together with predischarge stress echocardiography is recommended for risk stratification after acute MI. In particular, in thrombolytic-treated patients, echo examinations allow the detection of functional recovery of viable reperfused myocardium whereas stress echo may show exercise-induced worsening in the region supplied by the infarct-related vessel, a predictor of a higher rate of coronary events.

Multicenter trial on prognostic value of inducible ischemia, assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography and exercise electrocardiography test, in patients with uncomplicated myocardial infarction, treated with thrombolytic therapy

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis has reduced early and longterm mortality by about 20%; sometimes, however, there is a re-occlusion of the infarct related artery or an unsuccessful thrombolysis. In these situations, there is a possible increase in detrimental events in the follow-up.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare the prognostic value of dobutamine echocardiography (DET) and ECG exercise test (EET) in pts submitted to thrombolysis.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one pts, with acute uncomplicated myocardial infarction, were enrolled. The pts were able to perform EET and had a sufficient echocardiographic window; 58 had anterior myocardial infarction (38%), 79 had inferior (52%), 2 had lateral (1%), 12 had non-Q (8%). EET was performed with an initial load of 25 Watt, and thereafter, 25 W every two minutes. DET was performed with step-wise infusion every three minutes (5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 mcg/kg/min.). If the target heart rate was not reached, a further dose of 40 mcg/kg/min. together with atropine 0.25-1 mg was administered, in the absence of signs and symptoms of ischemia.

RESULTS

During a mean (+/- SD) follow-up period of 8 +/- 4.5 months (range 1-23), 16 spontaneous events happened (4 deaths, 5 non-fatal re-infarctions, 7 unstable angina). One-hundred and three EET (68%) were negative for ongoing ischaemia, while 48 were positive, 79 DET (52%) were negative for ongoing ischaemia and 72 were positive (48%). Statistical results: DET and EET had a sensitivity of 41% and 54%, a specificity of 57% and 74%, a positive predictive value of 7% and 14%, a negative predictive value of 91% and 95%, an accuracy of 56% and 73%. Kaplan-Maier survival curves demonstrated that patients with Peak Wall motion > 1.8 and EET score > 3, had the higher risk of spontaneous events.

CONCLUSION

A few spontaneous events happened in the follow-up. These data demonstrate that patients treated with thrombolysis are not at high risk of spontaneous events. DET and EET, therefore, have had a high negative predictive value. For this reason, we can conclude that pts with negative tests can be considered at low risk and do not need any further investigations.