Repetitive monomorphic tachycardia from the left ventricular outflow tract: electrocardiographic patterns consistent with a left ventricular site of origin

Anatomical approach to suppression of para-Hisian ventricular arrhythmias with changes in QRS morphology following ablation at the earliest activation site

BACKGROUND

The anatomical approach for the management of para-Hisian ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) with QRS morphological changes following catheter ablation (CA) has not been well investigated.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the electrocardiographic and electrophysiological findings and ablation outcomes of para-Hisian VAs with QRS morphological changes following CA.

METHODS

Among 30 patients who underwent CA for para-Hisian VAs at four institutions, 10 (33%) had QRS morphological changes following ablation. All 10 patients underwent an anatomical approach, targeting the site anatomically opposite to the site where the QRS morphology had been changed by ablation. We investigated the safety and efficacy of the anatomical approach.

RESULTS

Among the 10 patients evaluated, the approach was switched from the right ventricular septum to the left ventricular septum/aortic root in seven (RL group), whereas three underwent left-to-right switches (LR group). Following CA, the precordial transition zone tended to be earlier in the RL group and later in the LR group. In the RL group, successful VA suppression was achieved despite suboptimal pace map concordance from the left side or a relatively delayed earliest activation time. Of the 10 patients who underwent an anatomical approach, eight had procedural success, and ablation was discontinued in one due to the risk of atrioventricular block.

CONCLUSIONS

The anatomical approach showed promising results regarding safety and efficacy. Therefore, it should be considered when QRS morphological changes are observed during or after CA of para-Hisian VAs.

Experience of left ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia ablation in paediatric patients using limited fluoroscopy and three-dimensional mapping technique

OBJECTIVE

The left ventricular outflow tract is an important source of ventricular arrhythmias. Up to one-third of all idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structurally normal hearts may arise from this region. We would like to share the results of our left ventricular outflow tract ablation using three-dimensional mapping and limited fluoroscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective cohort study. Forty-six consecutive patients who underwent left ventricular outflow tract ablation procedures between January 2015 and June 2023 were included in the study. The EnSite Precision System (Abbott, St. Paul, MN, USA) was used to facilitate mapping and to reduce or eliminate the need for fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 29 males and 17 females, with a mean age of 13.4 ± 4.5 years. The most common location for arrhythmias was the left coronary cusp (n : 21). Other locations, in sequence, included the junction of the right and left coronary commissure (n : 10), right coronary cusp (n : 10), left ventricular outflow tract endocardium (n:4), aorto-mitral junction (n : 1), and great cardiac vein (n : 1). Nine of these patients had previously undergone unsuccessful right ventricular outflow tract ablation at another centre. Cryoablation was performed in three patients, irrigated radiofrequency ablation in three patients, and conventional radiofrequency ablation in the remaining patients. The acute success rate was 100%, and no recurrences were observed. The mean follow-up period was 49.6 ± 24.4 months. All patients were asymptomatic and were being followed without antiarrhythmic medication.

CONCLUSION

Although left ventricular outflow tract ablations pose a risk for coronary artery and heart valve complications, they can be performed successfully and safely with the guidance of three-dimensional mapping.

Reappraisal and New Observations on Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Ablated From the Noncoronary Aortic Sinus

BACKGROUND

The electrophysiological characteristics of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) from the noncoronary sinus (NCS) have not been fully described.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation in patients with idiopathic NCS-VA.

METHODS

This study comprised 11 patients undergoing radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation for idiopathic NCS-VA. Angiography was performed to confirm the origin in the aortic sinus before RF ablation.

RESULTS

Clinical arrhythmias presented left bundle block/inferior axis morphology in all patients. QRS morphology of R' and R/s' pattern was dominantly found in lead III. Mapping in the right ventricle demonstrated the earliest ventricular activation (EVA) site at the His Bundle region, whereas mapping in the NCS demonstrated that the EVA preceded the activation at the His Bundle region by 12.1 ± 7.9 milliseconds. All VAs were successfully ablated in <2.5 seconds within the NCS with 1 RF application. The successful ablation site was at the nadir of NCS in 10 patients, and near the junction of NCS and the right coronary sinus in the remaining one. A discrete potential can be observed at the EVA site within the NCS in 10 patients (91%); however, an excellent pace mapping at the EVA site was obtained in only 2 patients. Junctional beats did not occur during RF application in all 11 patients. There were no complications or clinical recurrence during a mean follow-up of 26.0 ± 9.8 months.

CONCLUSIONS

NCS-VA presents a peculiar electrocardiogram. A discrete potential can be mapped within the NCS during VA and sinus rhythm, and can be used in guiding ablation.

Catheter Ablation of Left Ventricular Summit Arrhythmias from Adjacent Anatomic Vantage Points

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VA), particularly left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) VA accounts for up to 10% of all VAs referred for ablative therapy. In addition to being infrequent, its intricate anatomy and its pathophysiology make catheter ablation (CA) of these arrhythmias a challenge even for experts. In this scenario, detailed right ventricular outflow tract as well as LVOT electroanatomic mapping including epicardial mapping are essential. In this article, we will emphasize our approach toward the CA technique used for LVOT VA, particularly IVS and/or LVS VA originating from intramural foci, along with its acute and long-term efficacy and safety.

Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia

Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is an important cause of morbidity and less commonly, mortality in patients with structurally normal hearts. Appropriate diagnosis and management are predicated on an understanding of the mechanism, relevant cardiac anatomy, and associated ECG signatures. Catheter ablation is a viable strategy to adequately treat and potentially provide a cure in patients that are intolerant to medications or when these are ineffective. In this review, we discuss special approaches and considerations for effective and safe ablation of VT arising from the right ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular outflow tract, left ventricular fascicles, papillary muscles, and moderator band.

Techniques for Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating from the Outflow Tract and Left Ventricular Summit

Idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) most commonly originate from the ventricular outflow tracts. Because the anatomy of this region is complex and some of those VA origins are intramural and epicardial, it may sometimes be difficult to locate the site of the VA origin. Meticulous mapping in multiple different locations such as the right and left ventricular outflow tracts, endocardial and epicardial sites, and above and below the aortic and pulmonic valves may be required to achieve successful catheter ablation of those VAs. Special ablation techniques may be considered to improve the outcome of catheter ablation of intramural and epicardial VAs.

Development of a Visualization Deep Learning Model for Classifying Origins of Ventricular Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Several algorithms have been proposed for differentiating the right and left outflow tracts (RVOT/LVOT) arrhythmia origins from 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs); however, the procedure is complicated. A deep learning (DL) model, a form of artificial intelligence, can directly use ECGs and depict the importance of the leads and waveforms. This study aimed to create a visualized DL model that could classify arrhythmia origins more accurately.Methods and Results: This study enrolled 80 patients who underwent catheter ablation. A convolutional neural network-based model that could classify arrhythmia origins with 12-lead ECGs and visualize the leads that contributed to the diagnosis using a gradient-weighted class activation mapping method was developed. The average prediction results of the origins by the DL model were 89.4% (88.2-90.6) for accuracy and 95.2% (94.3-96.2) for recall, which were significantly better than when a conventional algorithm is used. The ratio of the contribution to the prediction differed between RVOT and LVOT origins. Although leads V1 to V3 and the limb leads had a focused balance in the LVOT group, the contribution ratio of leads aVR, aVL, and aVF was higher in the RVOT group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study diagnosed the arrhythmia origins more accurately than the conventional algorithm, and clarified which part of the 12-lead waveforms contributed to the diagnosis. The visualized DL model was convincing and may play a role in understanding the pathogenesis of arrhythmias.

Evaluation of five algorithms in predicting the sublocalisation of right ventricular outflow tract arrhythmia (RVOTA) when compared to 3D electroanatomical mapping origin

Purpose

To compare the predictive accuracy of five different algorithms as verified by successful ablation site using 3D electroanatomical non-contact mapping in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic but high ventricular burden RVOT tachycardias.

Methods

28 Consecutive patients admitted for radiofrequency catheter ablation for symptomatic and asymptomatic, but high ventricular burden idiopathic VPC were recruited for this study. All patients had previous failed or intolerant to beta-blocker and/or at least one class IC anti-arrhythmic agents, and they had normal left ventricular ejection fraction. All patients had documented monomorphic VPC with left bundle branch block morphology and an inferior axis. Concordance of the arrhythmia origin based on ECG algorithm and 3D mapping system site were further evaluated. Of the five algorithms, two algorithms with easy‐applicability and having a memorable design (Dixit and Joshi) and three algorithms with more complex and detailed design (Ito, Zhang, Pytkowski) were selected for comparisons.

Results

Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy showed that each of the five algorithms had only moderate accuracy, and the greatest accuracy was observed in the algorithm proposed by Pytkowski algorithm when assessed by a general cardiologist and Dixit algorithm when evaluated by the electrophysiologist. However, when the algorithms were compared for their accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, no significant differences were found (p = 0.99).

Conclusions

The ECG based algorithms for precise localising RVOTA origin simplify the mapping process, reduce the procedural and fluoroscopic time, and improve clinical outcomes, resulting in greater clinical utility. All the five published 12-lead ECG algorithms for ROTVA differentiation were similar in terms of the diagnostic accuracy, specificity, sensitivity and LRs.

A case of mistaken arrhythmogenic identity during pregnancy

Atypical LVOT ectopy can present with an RVOT morphology on ECG and differentiation to reveal this focus is in favor of benign idiopathic ventricular ectopy over an arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Electrocardiographic recognition of benign and malignant right ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) can originate from different anatomical locations of the right ventricle. Ventricular arrhythmias originating from right ventricle have unique electrocardiographic (ECG) characteristics that can be utilized to localize the origin of the arrhythmia. This is crucial in pre-procedural planning particularly for ablation treatments. Moreover, non-ischaemic structural heart diseases, such as infiltrative and congenital heart diseases, are associated with the VAs that exhibit particular ECG findings. This article comprehensively reviews discriminatory ECG characteristics of VAs in the right ventricle with and without structural right ventricular diseases.

Lead I R-wave amplitude to distinguish ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition originating from the left versus right ventricular outflow tract

BACKGROUND

The electrophysiology algorithm for localizing left or right origins of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OT-VAs) with lead V₃ transition still needs further investigation in clinical practice.

HYPOTHESIS

Lead I R-wave amplitude is effective in distinguishing the left or right origin of OT-VAs with lead V₃ transition.

METHODS

We measured lead I R-wave amplitude in 82 OT-VA patients with lead V₃ transition and a positive complex in lead I who underwent successful catheter ablation from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). The optimal R-wave threshold was identified, compared with the V₂ S/V₃ R index, transitional zone (TZ) index, and V₂ transition ratio, and validated in a prospective cohort study.

RESULTS

Lead I R-wave amplitude for LVOT origins was significantly higher than that for RVOT origins (0.55 ± 0.13 vs. 0.32 ± 0.15 mV; p < .001). The area under the curve (AUC) for lead I R-wave amplitude as assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.926, with a cutoff value of ≥0.45 predicting LVOT origin with 92.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity, superior to the V₂ S/V₃ R index, TZ index, and V₂ transition ratio. VAs in the LVOT group mainly originated from the right coronary cusp (RCC) and left and right coronary cusp junction (L-RCC). In the prospective study, lead I R-wave amplitude identified the LVOT origin with 92.3% accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Lead I R-wave amplitude provides a useful and simple criterion to identify RCC or L-RCC origin in OT-VAs with lead V₃ transition.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias From the Left Ventricular Apex in Patients Without Ischemic Heart Disease

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to characterize the incidence, clinical characteristics, and electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic features of LVA VA in the absence of CAD and to describe the experience with catheter ablation (CA) in this group.

BACKGROUND

The left ventricular apex (LVA) is a well-described source of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and history of apical infarction but is a rare source of VA in the absence of CAD.

METHODS

Patients referred for CA of VA at our institution were retrospectively reviewed, and those with LVA VA in the absence of CAD were identified.

RESULTS

Of 3,710 consecutive patients undergoing VA ablation, CA of LVA VA was performed in 24 patients (20 with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, 4 with premature ventricular contractions or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; 18 men; mean age: 54 ± 15 years). These cases comprised 10 of 35 (29%) hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 9 of 789 (1.2%) nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 5 of 1,432 (0.4%) idiopathic VA ablation procedures. VA QRS morphology was predominantly right bundle with slurred upstroke and right superior frontal plane axis with precordial transition ≤V3. Epicardial ablation was performed in 14 of 24 (58%). After a median of 1 procedure (range 1 to 4) at this institution and median follow-up of 47 months (range 0-176), VA recurred in 1 patient (4%).

CONCLUSIONS

LVA VA in the absence of CAD is unusual and may occur in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy or, rarely, in the absence of structural heart disease. It can be recognized by characteristic ECG features. CA of LVA VA is challenging; multiple procedures, including epicardial approaches, may be required to achieve VA control over long-term follow-up.

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias arising from pulmonary cusps

Introduction

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) have been successfully ablated from the pulmonary sinus cusps establishing pulmonary artery (PA) as a distinct site of arrhythmic foci. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinical presentation, electrocardiographic, and ablation characteristics of PA‐VAs.

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients with right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT)‐type VAs were included in this retrospective study. Three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping was performed in all patients. Mapping was performed initially in RVOT, and later within the PA. Mapping was performed in the PA if there was no early activation, unsatisfactory pace‐map, or ablation in RVOT were unsuccessful. All PA‐VAs were mapped and ablated by looping the catheter in a reverse U fashion.

Results

Among 30 patients, 8 (26.6%) patients VAs were successfully ablated within PA. Electrocardiography (ECG) revealed that the QRS duration was significantly wider in the PA‐VAs group compared to the RVOT‐VAs group (155 ± 14.14 vs 142.40 ± 8.12 ms, P < .01). Mapping by reversed U method of PA‐VAs revealed earlier activation (55 ± 9.66 vs 12.00 ± 8.61 ms, P < .01) in PA compared to RVOT. An isolated discrete prepotential was present at the successful site in 50% (n = 4).

Conclusion

Pulmonary artery‐VAs are an important subset of VA originating from the outflow tract. They have a wider baseline QRS duration compared to RVOT‐VAs. Presence of a prepotential aids in the identification of a successful ablation site. Mapping utilizing the reversed U method can help in localization and successful ablation of PA‐VAs.

Concealed structural heart disease discovered at cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with ventricular extrasystoles from ventricular outflow tract and apparently normal hearts

BACKGROUND

Outflow tract (OT) premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are commonly found in clinical practice; in most cases, PVCs are benign and observed in structurally normal hearts, not requiring any therapeutic intervention. In this study, we therefore sought to evaluate with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) patients with PVC and apparently normal heart at echocardiographic examination, in order to identify possible substrates linked with higher prevalence of arrhythmias or structural heart disease.

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients with frequent PVCs originating from the ventricular OT (right and left) were enrolled in the study and assessed by echocardiography and CMR. All patients had normal baseline electrocardiogram.

RESULTS

CMR showed structural changes in 5 patients out of 33; in 3 cases, areas of fibrosis limited in one case to the middle basal segments of the interventricular septum and in two patients to the middle basal segments of the inferior-lateral wall were found. In 2 other cases, however, late gadolinium enhancement showed significant anomalies characterized in one patient by extensive areas of subepicardial fibrosis of the left ventricle, suitable with arrhythmogenic left dominant dysplasia; in another patient, a marked trabeculation of left ventricular medium apical segments suitable with non-compaction myocardium was present.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR may identify cases of structural heart disease in subjects with OT PVCs and apparently normal electrocardiogram and echocardiogram examinations. A preliminary screening with CMR may be considered before any further invasive electrophysiology assessment and therapeutic planning.

Modern mapping and ablation techniques to treat ventricular arrhythmias from the left ventricular summit and interventricular septum

Managing arrhythmias from the left ventricular summit and interventricular septum is a major challenge for the clinical electrophysiologist requiring intimate knowledge of cardiac anatomy, advanced training and expertise. Novel mapping and ablation strategies are needed to treat arrhythmias originating from these regions given the current suboptimal long-term success rates with standard techniques. Herein, we describe innovative approaches to improve acute and long-term clinical outcomes such as mapping and ablation using the septal coronary venous system and the septal coronary arteries, alcohol ablation, coil embolization, and ablation of all early sites among others.

Idiopathic basal crux ventricular arrhythmias with left bundle branch block and superior axis: A comparison with inferior-septal valvular arrhythmias

INTRODUCTION

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) with superior axis is common in patients with idiopathic-ventricular arrhythmia (VA) originating from the tricuspid annulus (TA) and rarely from the cardiac basal crux and mitral annulus (MA). We described the electrocardiography and electrophysiological findings of idiopathic-VA presenting with LBBB and superior axis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We described 42 idiopathic-VA patients who had an LBBB and superior axis; 15 basal crux-VA, 17 TA-VA, and 10 MA-VA. No patient had a structural heart disease. Among patients with idiopathic-VA referred for ablation, we investigated the electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics of basal crux-VA as compared with other LBBB and superior axis-VA. The left ventricular ejection fraction with MA-VA was significantly lower in comparison with basal crux-VA (P = .01). All patients had a positive R wave in lead I and aVL. The maximum deflection index with basal crux-VA was significantly higher in comparison with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .01). Patients with basal crux-VA presented with QS wave in lead II more frequently as compared with TA-VA or MA-VA (P = .001). All MA-VA patients had Rs wave in V6, and basal crux-VA, and TA-VA patients had a monophasic R wave or Rs wave in V6. Basal crux-VA patients underwent ablation in the middle cardiac vein (MCV) or coronary sinus (success rate: 94%, recurrence rate: 6%).

CONCLUSIONS

We could distinguish basal crux-VA, TA-VA, and MA-VA, using a combination of clinical and electrocardiographic findings. These findings might be useful for counseling patients about an ablation strategy. Ablation via the MCV is effective for eliminating basal crux-VA.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Compartmentalized Structure of the Moderator Band Provides a Unique Substrate for Macroreentrant Ventricular Tachycardia

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are observed in the setting of structural heart disease. However, in a proportion of patients presenting with VT, the routine diagnostic modalities fail to demonstrate overt myocardial abnormality. These arrhythmias have been called idiopathic VAs. They consist of various subtypes that have been defined by their anatomic location of origin within the heart and/or their underlying mechanism. While the majority of patients are asymptomatic, some experience debilitating symptoms and may develop reversible ventricular dysfunction. Catheter ablation has been traditionally reserved for patients with incapacitating symptoms or progressive ventricular dysfunction. However, as many patients are young, and catheter ablation can be curative in >90% of cases with a low risk (<1%) of serious complications, it is increasingly being offered as a first-line treatment in symptomatic patients. The approach to arrhythmia mapping is guided by the 12-lead electrocardiograph (ECG) morphology of the ventricular tachycardia (VT). Use of three dimensional (3D) electroanatomic mapping systems and intra-cardiac echocardiography are helpful in localising sites for successful ablation.

Localization of Ventricular Arrhythmias for Catheter Ablation: The Role of Surface Electrocardiogram

The surface ECG is a valuable mapping tool in patients with idiopathic and scar-related ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). A detailed analysis of 12-lead ECG can provide useful information in localizing the VA site of origin. This might help tailoring the ablation strategy to optimize procedural duration, increase the probability of success, and prevent complications. The aim of this article is to review the ECG features of both idiopathic and scar-related VAs and discuss their potential implications for optimizing the ablation strategy.

An electrocardiographic diagnostic model for differentiating left from right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia origin

INTRODUCTION

Although several electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithms have been proposed for differentiating the origins of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias, the most optimal one has not been agreed on. The purpose of this study was to establish an ECG diagnostic model based on the previous ECG algorithms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The following ECG diagnostic model, Y=-1.15×( TZ )-0.494×(V2S/V3R), was developed by standard 12-lead ECG algorithms in 488 patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions or ventricular tachycardia with a left bundle branch block pattern and inferior axis QRS morphology. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to establish the ECG diagnostic model. The ECG diagnostic model consisted of two ECG algorithms-the transition zone (TZ) index and V2S/V3R index. The area under the curve by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the ECG diagnostic model was 0.88, with a cut-off value of ≥ -0.76 predicting a left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) origin with a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 86%, which was higher than other ECG algorithms in this study. The predictive accuracy of the ECG diagnostic model was also the best among all ECG algorithms in patients with a lead V3 precordial transition. This model was tested prospectively in 207 patients with a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 87%, and Youden index of 0.77.

CONCLUSIONS

A highly accurate ECG diagnostic model for correctly differentiating LVOT origin from right ventricular outflow tract origin was developed.

Comparison of the predictive accuracy of four different ECG algorithms in identification of true ablation site for the idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardias

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the accuracy of four algorithms in prediction of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardias in patients who successfully underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation.

METHODS

Four algorithms; two with easy-applicability and having a memorable design (Dixit and Joshi), and two with more complex and detailed design (Ito and Zhang) were compared according to the predictive accuracy.

RESULTS

Among 99 patients (mean age 36.5 ± 8.5 years, 39.4% male), there were 51 (51.5%) septal-located and 48 (48.5%) free-wall located RVOT tachycardia. Comparison of the predictive accuracy of the algorithms showed that Zhang (91.9%) was the best algorithm for prediction of either septal or free-wall located tachycardia. The second best algorithm was the Ito (77.7%) compared to Dixit (75.8%) and Joshi (70.7%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with RVOT tachycardia, algorithms with a detailed design may predict the arrhythmia location better than the easy-applicable algorithms.

Outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias : Electrocardiographic features in relation to mapping and ablation

Ventricular arrhythmia arising from the outflow tracts can manifest itself as frequent premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), salvos of ventricular tachycardia (VT), and/or sustained VT. It is amenable to management with medication and catheter ablation without need for an intracardiac defibrillator. The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a crucial tool in the management of these patients as it is can help localize the site of origin, thereby helping guide the electrophysiologist. An appreciation of the unique anatomy of the outflow tracts as well as their relationships with the surrounding structures is essential in interpreting the ECG. In this review, we examine the ECG features of the various outflow tract arrhythmia morphologies with a focus on anatomy and provide an approach to the ablation of these abnormal rhythms.

New-onset ventricular arrhythmias post radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

As a new complication, new-onset ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) post atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation have not been well defined. This prospective study aimed to describe the details of new-onset VAs post AF ablation in a large study cohort.One thousand fifty-three consecutive patients who underwent the first radiofrequency catheter ablation for AF were enrolled. All patients had no evidence of pre-ablation VAs. New-onset VAs were defined as new-onset ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVC) ≥1000/24 h within 1 month post ablation.There were 46 patients (4.4%) who had 62 different new-onset VAs, among whom 42 were PVC alone, and 4 were PVC coexisting with nonsustained VT. Multivariate analysis showed that increased serum leukocyte counts ≥50% post ablation were independently associated with new-onset VAs (OR: 1.9; 95% CI: 1.0-3.5; P = 0.043). The median number of PVC was 3161 (1001-27,407) times/24 h. Outflow tract VAs were recorded in 35 (76.1%) patients. No significant differences were found in origin of VAs (P = 0.187). VAs disappeared without any treatment in 6 patients (13.0%). No VAs-related adverse cardiac event occurred.The study revealed a noticeable prevalence but relatively benign prognosis of new-onset VAs post AF ablation. Increased serum leukocyte counts ≥50% post ablation appeared to be associated with new-onset VAs, implying that inflammatory response caused by ablation might be the mechanism.

Long-Term Results After Single and Multiple Procedures of Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to assess long-term results after single and multiple procedures of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT). While it is generally accepted that multiple procedures are sometimes necessary in order to achieve long-term clinical success, the literature on this issue displays wide variability.

METHODS

We assessed the outcome of 160 consecutive patients who underwent 214 ablation procedures in the period 2008 to May 2015: 93 had overt structural heart disease (SHD) (previous myocardial infarction in 74 cases) and 67 had no SHD.

RESULTS

After the first procedure, the 1-year actuarial recurrence rates were 25% in patients with SHD and 5% in those without. However, recurrences increased progressively after the first year, reaching 46% and 35%, respectively, at 5 years. Overall, VT recurred in 35/93 (38%) patients with SHD and 22/67 (33%) patients without. Redo (1 to 4) procedures were performed in 28 (20%) patients with SHD and 18 (27%) patients without. After the last procedure, the 1-year actuarial recurrence rates were 5% in patients with SHD and 7% in those without, and the corresponding rates at 5 years were 23% and 7%. During follow-up, 21 patients died (all in the SHD group): no death was related to VT recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

During long-term follow-up, VT frequently recurs after the first procedure, both in patients with SHD and in those without; multiple procedures are needed in order to increase the success rate.