Intravenous electron-beam computed tomographic coronary angiography for segmental analysis of coronary artery stenoses

Coronary CT angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: Standard-dose and low-dose imaging with a high-resolution whole-heart CT scanner

OBJECTIVE

To compare image quality, observer confidence, radiation exposure in the standard-dose (SD-CCTA) and low-dose (LD-CCTA) protocols of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

CCTA was performed in 303 patients using a CT scanner with 16-cm coverage (111 scans during sinus rhythm (SR); 192 during AF). LD-CCTA was used in 218 patients; SD-CCTA in 85 patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD). Image quality and observer confidence were evaluated on 5-point scales. Radiation doses were recorded.

RESULTS

Image quality was superior in the SD-CCTA compared to the LD-CCTA (SR 1.45±0.40; AF 1.72±0.46; vs. SR 1.83±0.48; AF 1.92±0.50; p < 0.001). Observers were more confident with SD-CCTA than with LD-CCTA (SR 1.38±0.33; AF 1.61±0.43; vs. SR 1.70±0.45; AF 1.82±0.50; p < 0.001). Radiation doses in AF were significantly higher than in the SR (LD-CCTA, 1.68±0.71 mSv; SD-CCTA, 3.72±1.95 mSv; vs. LD-CCTA, 1.3 ±0.52 mSv; SD-CCTA, 2.67±1.47 mSv; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Using a low-dose protocol in AF, radiation exposure can be decreased by 50 % at the expense of 20 % impaired image quality. A low-dose CCTA protocol can be considered in young patients, whereas the standard-dose protocol is recommended for older patients and those suspected of having CAD.

KEY POINTS

• Whole-heart CT allows visualization of the coronary arteries in atrial fibrillation. • Low-dose CT decreases radiation exposure by 50%, image quality by 20%. • Standard-dose CT seems advantageous when concomitant coronary artery disease is suspected.

Coronary CT angiography-future directions

Clinical applications of coronary CT angiography (CTA) will typically be based on the method´s very high sensitivity to identify coronary stenosis if image quality is good and if the pre-test likelihood of the patients is in the lower range. Guidelines of national and international cardiac societies are starting to incorporate coronary CTA into their recommendations for the management of patients with stable and acute chest pain. Initial data show that in the future, the use of coronary CTA may not only be able to replace other forms of diagnostic testing, but, in fact, may improve patient outcome. In this article, a perspective is provided on the future directions of coronary CTA.

Noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography

While noninvasive imaging of the coronary lumen remains challenging, great strides have been made with computed tomography. Two variations of computed tomography are used in the study of the coronary tree: multislice or multidetector computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography. Both have high spatial and temporal resolutions as well as excellent signal-to-noise ratios, which allows major branches of the coronary tree to be depicted. Impaired image quality, due to dense calcifications and multiple image artifacts including coronary artery motion and breathing artifacts, limits the clinical utility of noninvasive coronary angiography. Early studies with electron-beam angiography demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 89% for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. With early diastolic imaging, the sensitivity and specificity increases to 92 and 93%, respectively (rather than 80% of the cardiac interbeat interval, where coronary motion is more pronounced). Multidetector computed tomography, with improved spatial resolution but decreased temporal resolution, produces results that vary depending on the equipment. Four-slice scanners have an average sensitivity of only 61%, and only 38% of patients have all four vessels or 15 segments available for analysis, due to both cardiac motion and calcification. Thinner slice collimation with eight and 16 slices have allowed for improved detection. Sensitivity and specificity improve to 80 and 86%, respectively. Furthermore, the number of assessable segments with eight-to 16-slice scanners improves significantly, compared with four-slice scanners (85 vs. 73%; p<0.001). If only assessable segments are included in analysis, sensitivity and specificity for multidetector-row computed tomography improves to nearly 90%. Compared with magnetic resonance imaging, with a reported accuracy of 72% in the only multicenter study, computed tomography has great promise to become the primary method of noninvasive coronary angiography.

Accuracy and clinical outcomes of computed tomography coronary angiography in the presence of a high coronary calcium score

BACKGROUND

A high coronary calcium burden may adversely affect image quality of CT coronary angiography (CTCA). The ability to rule out clinically significant disease in this setting is uncertain.

METHODS

We examined CTCA findings in patients with a calcium score of >600. Utilising a search of death notices, structured patient interview and medical records, downstream investigations, cardiovascular events, revascularisation and mortality were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty patients with a calcium score >600 had CTCA performed on the same day. Coronary disease findings were: mild 28%, moderate 33%, severe 32% and non-diagnostic 7%. During a median 1.75-year follow-up, 31 (53%) of patients underwent further assessment for coronary disease, eight patients (13%) underwent revascularisation and there were two non-cardiovascular and one cardiovascular deaths. No patient with mild or moderate disease at CTCA had subsequently demonstrated ischaemia, was deemed to require PCI or suffered cardiac mortality. The negative predictive value of CTCA for subsequent PCI and all-cause mortality was 97% (100% for cardiac mortality only). The positive predictive value of CTCA for revascularisation or CV death was 42%.

CONCLUSION

In patients with an elevated coronary calcium score, a negative CTCA implies an excellent short-term outcome and appears to exclude clinically significant coronary disease.

Role of noninvasive imaging using computed tomography for detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerosis

Clinical cardiac computed tomography (CT) began with electron-beam CT in the early 1980s and continues now with multidetector CT in the 21st Century. The major applications of noncontrast cardiac CT are currently for the quantification of coronary artery calcium – a reliable and repeatable means to estimate atherosclerotic plaque burden. The major applications of contrast-enhanced CT (CT angiography) is for a more detailed estimation of total plaque burden by qualitatively defining noncalcified and complex plaque as well as ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease. Both of these applications are discussed and comments are made from the author regarding clinical applications based upon reviewing the published literature and through personal experience.

Coronary computed tomography angiography---a promising imaging modality in diagnosing coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, information on coronary artery lesions is obtained from invasive coronary angiography (CAG). The clinical applicability and diagnostic performance of the newly developed 64-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) scanner in coronary angiographic evaluation is not well evaluated.

METHODS

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) was performed in 345 patients (119 women, 226 men; mean age, 59.64 +/- 11.67 years). Concomitant CAG was performed in 53 patients. The diagnostic performance of CCTA for detecting significant lesions was compared with that of CAG by 3 independent cardiologists.

RESULTS

All CCTA was performed without complication. Comparison between CCTA and CAG was made in the 53 patients who underwent both studies. Sensitivity, specificity and the positive and negative predictive values for the 53 patients were: 81%, 99%, 87% and 99%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 64-slice MSCT, developed in recent years, allows reliable noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery morphology, including plaque, stenosis and congenital anomaly. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT scans for detecting lesions makes it a good imaging substitute for CAG in the evaluation of these coronary segments.

A systematic review on diagnostic accuracy of CT-based detection of significant coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of contrast enhanced coronary computed tomography (CE-CCT).

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive detection of coronary artery stenosis (CAS) by CE-CCT as an alternative to catheter-based coronary angiography (CCA) may improve patient management.

METHODS

Forty-one articles published between 1997 and 2006 were included that evaluated native coronary arteries for significant stenosis and used CE-CCT as diagnostic test and CCA as reference standard. Study group characteristics, study methodology and diagnostic outcomes were extracted. Pooled summary sensitivity and specificity of CE-CCT were calculated using a random effects model (1) for all coronary segments, (2) assessable segments, and (3) per patient.

RESULTS

The 41 studies totaled 2515 patients (75% males; mean age: 59 years, CAS prevalence: 59%). Analysis of all coronary segments yielded a sensitivity of 95% (80%, 89%, 86%, 98% for electron beam CT, 4/8-slice, 16-slice and 64-slice MDCT, respectively) for a specificity of 85% (77%, 84%, 95%, 91%). Analysis limited to segments deemed assessable by CT showed sensitivity of 96% (86%, 85%, 98%, 97%) for a specificity of 95% (90%, 96%, 96%, 96%). Per patient, sensitivity was 99% (90%, 97%, 99%, 98%) and specificity was 76% (59%, 81%, 83%, 92%). Heterogeneity was quantitatively important but not explainable by patient group characteristics or study methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Current diagnostic accuracy of CE-CCT is high. Advances in CT technology have resulted in increases in diagnostic accuracy and proportion of assessable coronary segments. However, per patient, accuracy may be lower and CT may have more limited clinical utility in populations at high risk for CAD.

Clinical utility of cardiac computed tomography

Technological advances have made cardiac computed tomography (CT) an important player in cardiac imaging. Cardiac CT has become a powerful tool in the armamentarium of cardiac risk stratification assessment of intermediate-risk patients, bypass grafts, stents, and anomalous coronary arteries. With advancement in accuracy and reliability, cardiac CT is becoming mainstream in everyday clinical cardiology. It is up to the clinician to use the technology effectively and appropriately. It is certain that cardiac CT technology will continue to improve.

Cardiac CT: coronary arteries and beyond

Multi-detector-row computed tomography (MDCT) has emerged as a rapidly developing method for non-invasive imaging of the heart. An understanding of ECG synchronization, contrast material administration, patient preparation and image post-processing is needed to optimize image quality. The basic technical principles and essentials of these technical basics are described here. Correctly applied cardiac MDCT allows imaging of the coronary arteries including coronary anatomy and stenosis detection. The same is true for evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and, to some extent, coronary artery stents. While quantification of total calcified plaque burden has been long established, coronary MDCT allows assessing plaque morphology and constitution. Recent approaches go beyond the coronaries and include evaluation of left ventricular function at rest and myocardial viability. In combination with experimental approaches for assessing aortic valve function and myocardial perfusion imaging, cardiac MDCT offers the potential for a comprehensive examination of the heart using a single breath-hold examination.

In-vivo accuracy of geometrically correct three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary arteries: is it influenced by certain parameters?

OBJECTIVE

The geometrically correct three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary arteries by integrating intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and biplane angiography constitutes a promising imaging method for coronaries with broad clinical potential. The determinants of the accuracy of the method, however, have not been investigated before.

METHODS

In total, 17 arterial segments (right coronary artery, n=7; left anterior descending, n=4; left circumflex, n=6) derived from nine patients were three-dimensionally reconstructed by applying three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound. The degree of matching between the reconstructed lumen back-projected onto each angiographic plane and the actual lumen in each plane was used as a measure of method's accuracy. The investigated factors that could potentially affect the reliability of the method included the type of the artery (left anterior descending, left circumflex, right coronary artery) and several geometrical and morphological characteristics of the reconstructed arteries.

RESULTS

The correlation between the back-projected reconstructed lumens and the actual angiographic ones was found to be high (r=0.78, P<0.001). Neither the category of the reconstructed arteries nor their particular geometrical and morphological characteristics influenced the accuracy of the reconstruction method significantly. Nonetheless, the method exhibited slightly less accuracy in the reconstruction of right coronary arteries, an observation that could be attributed to the more intense pulsatile motion that this artery experiences during the cardiac cycle compared to the left anterior descending and left circumflex artery.

CONCLUSIONS

The in-vivo accuracy of three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (3D IVUS) is significantly high regardless of the type of the coronary arteries or their particular geometrical and morphological characteristics. This finding further supports the applicability of the method for either diagnostic or investigational purposes.

Noninvasive cardiac imaging in the evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndromes

Optimal management of patients presenting with chest pain to the emergency department is a major challenge, both in terms of a diagnostic dilemma and consumption of resources. The triage of such patients can be aided vastly by the appropriate use of noninvasive imaging. Noninvasive imaging modalities such as echocardiogram, radionuclide perfusion studies, positron emission tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography have all been demonstrated to have favorable diagnostic and prognostic value, with an enhanced sensitivity to detect acute ischemia. A normal noninvasive evaluation in the appropriate clinical setting presents a strong argument against acute ischemia as an etiology of the chest pain. Randomized trials of both rest and stress imaging in the emergency department have confirmed a reduction in unnecessary hospitalizations and cost savings without compromising the safety of the patient. Cardiac magnetic resonance and computed tomography would provide an insight into subendocardial ischemia, the detection of which has previously been difficult, using single-photon emission tomography and echocardiography. In this review, novel hot-spot imaging modalities are discussed including infarct-avid imaging agents and ischemia-avid imaging agents, thus elucidating the pathophysiology of reperfusion-induced cell death. These agents represent work in evolution and are likely to be used routinely in the future as understanding of coronary syndromes and coronary artery disease becomes clearer.

Emergency cardiac imaging: state of the art

Multiple strategies and testing modalities are available to evaluate patients presenting to the emergency department with cardiac complaints. Many provide anatomic and prognostic information about coronary stenosis and long-term out-comes. Although nuclear and stress echo imaging have the ability to predict outcomes in patients in the emergency department population, the newer modalities of cardiac imaging (EBCT, MDCT,and CMR) continue to show promising results and may soon be incorporated into emergency department chest pain centers. Protocols can be developed within an institution to meet the needs of the patient population while minimizing risk and improving outcomes for all patients.

Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The study's purpose was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (CT) for the detection of coronary artery disease.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A search of the literature in all languages was performed incorporating both electronic and manual components. Manual reference checks of recent reviews and all original investigations supplemented the electronic searches.

RESULTS

Average sensitivity for patient-based detection of significant (>50% or > or =50%) stenosis was 61 of 64 (95%) with 4-slice CT, 276 of 292 (95%) with 16-slice CT, and 47 of 47 (100%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 84% for 4-slice CT, 84% for 16-slice CT, and 100% for 64-slice CT. The sensitivity for a significant stenosis in evaluable segments was 307 of 372 (83%) with 4-slice CT, 1023 of 1160 (88%) with 16-slice CT, and 165 of 176 (94%) with 64-slice CT. Average specificity was 93% or greater with all multidetector CT. Seventy-eight percent of segments were evaluable with 4-slice CT, 91% with 16-slice CT, and 100% with 64-slice CT. Stenoses in proximal and mid-segments were shown with a higher sensitivity than distal segments. Left main stenosis was identified with high sensitivity with all multidetector CT, but sensitivity in other vessels increased with an increasing number of detectors.

CONCLUSION

Multidetector CT has the potential to be used as a screening test in appropriate patients. Contrast-enhanced 16-slice CT seems to be reasonably sensitive and specific for the detection of significant coronary artery disease but has shortcomings. Preliminary data with 64-slice CT suggest that it is more sensitive and specific.

Pictorial review: electron beam computed tomography and multislice spiral computed tomography for cardiac imaging

Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) revolutionized cardiac imaging by combining a constant high temporal resolution with prospective ECG triggering. For years, EBCT was the primary technique for some non-invasive diagnostic cardiac procedures such as calcium scoring and non-invasive angiography of the coronary arteries. Multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) on the other hand significantly advanced cardiac imaging through high volume coverage, improved spatial resolution and retrospective ECG gating. This pictorial review will illustrate the basic differences between both modalities with special emphasis to their image quality. Several experimental and clinical examples demonstrate the strengths and limitations of both imaging modalities in an intraindividual comparison for a broad range of diagnostic applications such as coronary artery calcium scoring, coronary angiography including stent visualization as well as functional assessment of the cardiac ventricles and valves. In general, our examples indicate that EBCT suffers from a number of shortcomings such as limited spatial resolution and a low contrast-to-noise ratio. Thus, EBCT should now only be used in selected cases where a constant high temporal resolution is a crucial issue, such as dynamic (cine) imaging. Due to isotropic submillimeter spatial resolution and retrospective data selection MSCT seems to be the non-invasive method of choice for cardiac imaging in general, and for assessment of the coronary arteries in particular. However, technical developments are still needed to further improve the temporal resolution in MSCT and to reduce the substantial radiation exposure.

Contrast enhancement in electron beam tomography of the heart: comparison of a monomeric and a dimeric iodinated contrast agent in 59 patients

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study is to determine whether intravascular time-density course and visualization of the coronary arteries differ with use of a hyperosmolar monomeric versus an iso-osmolar dimeric contrast agent in electron beam tomography (EBT) of the heart.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients underwent EBT of the coronary arteries using the monomeric ioversol or the dimeric iodixanol at the same concentration of 320 mg I/mL. Contrast volume was determined relative to body surface area and injected over 40 seconds. Intravascular time-density curves were created for quantitative analysis. For qualitative assessment, visualization of coronary arteries on axial scans and three-dimensional reconstructions was scored. Patients were matched for contrast flow, transit time, and mean pulse rate for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Ioversol produced a significantly greater increase in intravascular density for up to 30 seconds after injection (P < .01) compared with iodixanol. No difference between the two contrast media was seen in the qualitative assessment.

CONCLUSION

Monomeric and dimeric contrast media differ in their time-density curves at coronary EBT, a reason for which is not apparent. Qualitative evaluation of coronary arteries is not affected by this difference.

Non-invasive coronary angiography with multi-detector computed tomography: comparison to conventional X-ray angiography

Selective coronary angiography introduced clinical coronary imaging in the late 1950s. The angiographic identification of high-grade coronary lesions in patients with acute and chronic symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) led to the development of surgical and percutaneous coronary revascularization. However, the fact that CAD remains the major cause of death in North America and Europe demonstrates the need for novel, complementary diagnostic strategies. These are driven by the need to characterize both increasingly advanced disease stages but also early, asymptomatic disease development. Complex revascularization techniques for patients with advanced disease stages will initiate a growing demand for 3-dimensional coronary imaging and integration of imaging modalities with new mechanical therapeutic devices. An emerging focus is atherosclerosis imaging with the goal to identify subclinical disease stages as the basis for pharmacological intervention aimed at disease stabilization or reversal. Non-invasive coronary imaging with coronary multidetector computed tomographic angiography (MDCTA) allows both assessment of luminal stenosis and subclinical disease of the arterial wall. Its complementary role in the assessment of early and advanced stages of CAD is increasingly recognized.

Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography of the Heart: Technique, Current Applications, and Perspective

Multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) is a rapidly evolving, noninvasive technique for cardiac imaging. Knowledge of the principle of electrocardiogram-gated MSCT and its limitations in clinical routine are needed to optimize image quality. Therefore, the basic technical principle including essentials of image postprocessing is described. Cardiac MSCT imaging was initially focused on coronary calcium scoring, MSCT coronary angiography, and analysis of left ventricular function. Recent studies also evaluated the ability of cardiac MSCT to visualize myocardial infarction and assess valvular morphology. In combination with experimental approaches toward the assessment of aortic valve function and myocardial viability, cardiac MSCT holds the potential for a comprehensive examination of the heart using one single examination technique.

Comparison of coronary artery calcium screening image quality between C-150 and e-Speed electron beam scanners

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

The newest generation of electron beam tomographic scanner (e-Speed) has increased spatial and temporal resolution compared with the C-150 XP scanner. The aim of this study was to evaluate coronary artery calcium screening image quality between the e-Speed and C-150 scanners (GE Imatron, San Francisco, CA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies from 41 patients (14 women and 27 men) who underwent serial coronary artery calcium screening with the C-150 (first study) and the e-Speed (second study) were analyzed. Individual computed tomography (CT) slices were assessed for coronary artery motion artifacts, and CT Hounsfield units (HU) and noise values (CT HU standard deviation) at 16 discrete cardiac sites were measured and averaged.

RESULTS

With the e-Speed scanner, there were significant decreases in right coronary artery motion artifacts compared with the C-150 scanner (0.3% versus 1.8%, P < .001) as well as decreased noise values (24.3 versus 32.0 HU, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Image quality is significantly improved with use of the e-Speed scanner, due to its improved temporal and spatial resolution, compared with the C-150 scanner.

The utility of multi-detector row spiral CT for detection of coronary artery stenoses

Contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomography (MDCT) was introduced as a promising noninvasive method for vascular imaging. This study examined the accuracy of this technique for detecting significant coronary artery stenoses. Both MDCT(Sensation 16, Siemens, Germany, 12x0.75 mm collimation and 0.42 sec rotation speed, 120 kV, 500 effective mA, and 2.7 mm/rotation table-feed) and invasive coronary angiography (CAG) were performed on 61 patients (mean age 59.2+/-10, 44 men) who were suspected of having coronary artery disease. All patients were treated with atenolol (25-50 mg) prior to imaging and the heart rate was maintained below 65 beats per minutes during image acquisition. The images were reconstructed in the diastole around TI-400 ms with a 0.5 mm increment and a 1.0 mm thickness. All coronary arteries with a diameter of 2.0 mm or more were assessed for the presence of a stenosis (>50% luminal narrowing). Two independent radiologists who were unaware of the results of the invasive CAG evaluated the MDCT data, and the results were compared with those from the invasive CAG (interval 1-27, mean 11 days). An evaluation of the CT coronary angiogram (CTCA) was possible in 58 of the 61 patients (95%). Image acquisition of the major coronary arteries including the left main trunk was available in 229 out of 244 arteries. Invasive CAG showed that 35 out of 58 patients had significant coronary artery stenoses by. patient analysis of those who could be evaluated showed that CT coronary angiography correctly classified 30 out of 35 patients as having at least 1 coronary stenosis (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 91.3%, positive predictive value 93.8%, negative predictive value 80.8%). By analyzing each coronary artery, CAG found 62 stenotic coronary arteries in the 229 coronary arteries that could be evaluated. MDCT correctly detected 50 out of 62 stenotic coronary arteries and an absence of stenosis was correctly identified in 156 out of 167 normal coronary arteries (sensitivity 80.6%, specificity 93.4%, positive predictive value 81.9%, negative predictive value 92.8%). The non-invasive technique of MDCT for examining the coronary artery appears to be a useful method for detecting coronary artery stenoses with a high accuracy particularly with the proximal portion and large arteries.

Noninvasive visualisation of coronary atherosclerosis with multislice computed tomography

Computed Tomography (Electron Beam Tomography: EBCT and multislice computed tomography: MSCT) have recently emerged as non-invasive diagnostic modalities that can quantify coronary calcium which is not only as indicator of coronary risk, but also permits assessment of the coronary lumen. The 16-slice MS-CT, the most recent CT-scanner has a very high resolution, which allows non-invasive assessment of coronary plaques. This has led to a stimulus for further research to assess the role of MSCT coronary plaque imaging in the identification of high-risk coronary plaques.

Methodology for improved detection of coronary stenoses with computed tomographic angiography

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive angiography is a promising technique for visualization of the coronary lumen; however, current methodologies lead to limited accuracy. We assessed the accuracy of electron beam computed tomographic angiography (EBA) for detection of coronary stenoses, using improved triggering techniques and thinner slice collimation.

METHODS

Eighty-six patients with suspected coronary disease were studied with EBA and conventional invasive coronary angiography. Electrocardiographic triggering was performed at a fixed time in end systole to reduce cardiac motion. Thin (1.5 mm) slices were obtained with 1.5 mm table incrementation. In axial (2-dimensional) EBA images and 3-dimensional reconstructions, all coronary arteries and side branches with a diameter of >or=1.5 mm were assessed for the presence of stenoses with >50% diameter reduction. Both EBA and invasive angiographic images were assessed in a blinded manner.

RESULTS

In comparison to invasive coronary angiography, EBA correctly classified 49 of 53 patients (92%) as having at least 1 coronary stenosis. Overall, 103 stenoses with >50% diameter reduction were present, and 93 of these lesions were correctly detected by EBA (sensitivity 90%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value 84%, and negative predictive value 96%). Only 5% of vessels could not be assessed, predominantly due to significant calcification.

CONCLUSIONS

Thinner slice collimation and end-systolic electrocardiographic triggering improves accuracy and assessment of coronary EBA for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease, making this study clinically useful in the evaluation of obstructive coronary artery disease.

Baseline Heart Rate–adjusted Electrocardiographic Triggering for Coronary Artery Electron-Beam CT Angiography

Conventional electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering (group 1, 53 patients) was compared with baseline heart rate-adjusted ECG triggering (group 2, 54 patients) for coronary artery electron-beam computed tomographic (CT) angiography. CT angiographic data sets were compared blindly with conventional angiograms according to segment. Nonassessability of coronary artery segments was reduced from 35% in group 1 to 13% in group 2 (P < .001). More motion-free coronary artery images were obtained in group 2 than in group 1, especially in the right coronary artery (95% vs 67%, P < .001). Overall sensitivity and specificity for luminal stenosis (> or =50%) were 69% and 82% (group 1) and 76% and 92% (group 2) (P > .05 and P < .001, respectively). Baseline heart rate-adjusted ECG triggering improves image quality at coronary artery CT angiography for detection of coronary artery disease.

Multidetector computed tomography-guided treatment strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a pilot study

Patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and evidence of myocardial ischaemia are scheduled for coronary angiography (CAG). In most patients CAG remains a single diagnostic procedure only. A prospective study was performed to evaluate whether 16-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) could predict treatment of the patients and to determine how many CAGs could have been prevented by MDCT scanning prior to CAG. Twenty-two patients with ACS were scanned prior to CAG. Based on MDCT data, a fictive treatment was proposed and compared to CAG-based treatment. Excellent accuracy was observed to detect significant stenoses using MDCT (sensitivity 94%, specificity 96%). In 45%, no PCI was performed during CAG, because of the absence of significant coronary artery disease (27%) or severe coronary artery disease, demanding CABG (18%). MDCT predicted correct treatment in 86%. By using MDCT data, 32% of the CAGs could have been prevented.

Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: current and future role of multi-detector row CT

While invasive imaging techniques, especially selective conventional coronary angiography, will remain vital to planning and guiding catheter-based and surgical treatment of significantly stenotic coronary lesions, the comprehensive and serial assessment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic stages of coronary artery disease (CAD) for preventive purposes will eventually need to rely on noninvasive imaging techniques. Cardiovascular imaging with tomographic modalities, including computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, has great potential for providing valuable information. This review article will describe the current and future role of cardiac CT, and in particular that of multi-detector row CT, for imaging of atherosclerotic and other pathologic changes of the coronary arteries. It will describe how tomographic coronary imaging may eventually supplement traditional angiographic techniques in understanding the patterns of atherosclerotic CAD development.

Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 2 reconstruction algorithms (multisegment and halfscan) for computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography in patients without beta-blocker medication.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with 42 significant coronary stenoses in 136 main coronary branches were examined using a 16-slice CT scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). Twenty-seven patients (79%) had heart rates above 65 beats/min.

RESULTS

Without exclusion of branches the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and rate of nonassessable segments with multisegment versus halfscan reconstruction were 88 versus 74%, 91 versus 71%, 90 versus 72%, and 2 versus 21% (P < 0.01), respectively. Multisegment reconstruction improved the average vessel length free of motion artifacts by 56% compared with halfscan reconstruction (P < 0.01). Image quality in terms of vessel continuity and visibility of side branches (P < 0.005) was significantly better using multisegment reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Multisegment reconstruction has superior diagnostic accuracy and image quality compared with halfscan reconstruction in patients with normal heart rates.

The use of CTA in the chest pain center: a perspective

Suitable imaging methods to reliably rule out coronary artery disease as the underlying condition might be beneficially applied in the workup of patients with acute chest pain. The temporal and spatial resolution of computed tomgraphy and electron beam computed tomography has seen continuous improvements over the past years. Current scanner generations permit relatively reliable visualization of the coronary arteries and several studies have demonstrated a high negative predictive value to rule out coronary artery stenoses. Even though applications in the context of acute coronary syndromes have not yet been specifically evaluated, it seems likely that computed tomography imaging may develop into a tool that can be integrated into the workflow in chest pain centers once appropriate studies have been performed.

Improved Accuracy of Noninvasive Electron Beam Coronary Angiography

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effect of electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering on the accuracy of coronary electron-beam angiography (EBA) as compared with invasive angiography.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three patients with suspected coronary disease were studied with intravenous coronary EBA and conventional coronary angiography. Patients were divided into 2 groups based upon ECG triggering on the EBA study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based upon different ECG triggering used: 80% R-R interval trigger method (group 1, n = 53) and end-systolic triggering (group 2, n = 80). End-systolic ECG triggering, which started at the end of the T wave in each study, was based on baseline heart rate.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity to detect a > or = 50% luminal stenosis was 69% in group 1 and 91% in group 2 (P = 0.002); specificity was 82% and 94% in group 1 and group 2, respectively (P < 0.001). Using newer triggering techniques (group 2) with EBA, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for patients with disease of the left main coronary artery or 3 vessel disease was 100%, 94%, and 98%, respectively. Nonassessability of coronary segments on 3D-EBA images was reduced from 35% in group 1 to 9% in group 2 patients (P < 0.001). The number of motion-free coronary images increased from 67% to 95% from group 1 to group 2 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

End-systolic ECG triggering improves accuracy, image quality, and assessability of segments of coronary EBA for the detection of angiographic coronary artery disease.

Past, present, and future perspective of cardiac computed tomography

In the United States, more than 1 million diagnostic invasive coronary angiograms are performed annually, and in about 50% the investigation is followed by an interventional procedure. The remaining symptomatic patients after angiography are treated conservatively or by bypass graft surgery. In recent decades coronary angiography has advanced to a fast and safe investigation. Nevertheless, in particular, patients are well aware of the small but not negligible risk of complications and the discomfort of the invasive procedure. In addition to electrocardiogram (EKG) or ultrasound stress test and thallium scintigraphy, there is further need for another noninvasive method that displays the morphology of the coronary arteries in a way that would allow the triage of patients with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) for a conservative, interventional, or surgical treatment.

Transitions: noninvasive coronary angiography using electron beam computed tomography: technique, clinical application, future prospective

Electron beam computed tomography has been available clinically for 20 years. It is the only computed tomography scanner specifically developed for cardiac imaging. Over the past decade, with improvements in methodology and computer software, electron beam computed tomography has been shown to provide an excellent method to perform noninvasive coronary angiography. This article looks at the historical aspects of electron beam computed tomography and comments on how to perform and interpret electron beam angiography studies. The expanding development of noninvasive coronary and peripheral angiography methods using computed tomography will have a significant influence on cardiovascular specialists and their practices.

Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the literature relating to electron beam angiography (EBA), magnetic resonance angiography, and spiral computed tomography, currently the three most promising noninvasive methods to visualize obstructions in the coronary tree.

BACKGROUND

Given the high costs and invasiveness of coronary angiography, there is increased interest in noninvasive coronary angiography, which has made great strides to become a clinically useful tool to augment conventional coronary angiography (CCA).

METHODS

MEDLINE searches were performed to include all articles related to noninvasive angiography utilizing either magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multi-row detector spiral computed tomography (MDCT), and electron beam tomography (EBT). Weighted analysis was performed to define the published sensitivity and specificity for each technique.

RESULTS

Electron beam angiography (EBA) provides an overall sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 91% for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Four-level MDCT data demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 89%, with higher accuracy in two recent studies of 16-level detector devices. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrated sensitivity for detection of obstructive CAD of 77% and specificity of 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive coronary angiography is a rapidly developing technique and currently not an alternative to CCA in all cases. All three methods are currently used clinically in certain centers with appropriate expertise. Selective use should prove both cost-effective and provide a safer, less-invasive method for patients to determine the need for medical versus revascularization therapy.

MS-CT Coronary Imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) have recently emerged as two techniques that can noninvasively visualize the coronary arteries. The latest generation 16-row detector multislice CT scanner is now considered the most reliable technique to visualize the coronaries. The sensitivity and specificity to detect a significant (>50% diameter stenosis) coronary stenosis is +/-94% and +/-90%, respectively. Further technical improvements are necessary to make CT a clinically reliable diagnostic tool.

Clinical results of minimally invasive coronary angiography using computed tomography

Fast, high-resolution CT techniques, such as EBCT and MDCT permit imaging of the coronary arteries. Continuous improvements in the capabilities of both technologies for visualization of the coronary lumen and detection of coronary artery stenoses are being made. Image quality currently is not robust enough in all patients to consider non-invasive coronary angiography by EBCT and MDCT a routine clinical tool. In selected patients and carefully performed, however, they show promise as means to exclude the presence of coronary artery stenoses in a non-invasive fashion. This may become a beneficial and important application of these technologies. Other possible applications pertain to smaller patient subsets, such as patients with anomalous coronary arteries, fistulas or aneurysms. The development of techniques to visualize non-calcified plaque is interesting with respect to assessment of coronary risk, but this requires further investigation.

Assessment of coronary bypass graft patency by electron-beam computed tomography

Twenty-one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively evaluated by conventional selective coronary angiography and electron-beam computed tomography. Eighty bypass grafts (60 saphenous vein and 20 left or right internal mammary artery) were evaluated for patency. The sensitivity and specificity of electron-beam computed tomography were 72% and 100%, respectively; positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 92.5%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity according to coronary region were: left anterior descending artery, 33% and 100%; diagonal artery, 67% and 100%; circumflex artery, 75% and 100%; right coronary artery, 100% and 100%. Electron-beam computed tomography is relatively accurate and a promising tool for noninvasive evaluation of graft patency after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Aortic atherosclerosis detected with electron-beam CT as a predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Several studies have demonstrated an association between coronary and aortic atherosclerosis. Aortic atherosclerosis is easily quantified by means of electron-beam computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of measurement of aortic atherosclerosis with electron-beam CT as an independent predictor of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-seven patients (67 men, 30 women; mean age, 61 years +/- 12) were enrolled and underwent electron-beam CT with and without contrast material. Coronary artery calcification was quantified with nonenhanced electron-beam CT by means of Agatston score. CAD was defined as luminal narrowing of the coronary artery by at least 70%, as measured with electron-beam angiography. Aortic atherosclerosis was quantified by measuring raised lesions of the aortic wall (plaque) and wall thickening (volume and thickness) in the midportion of the descending thoracic aorta (10 contiguous sections), as depicted at contrast material-enhanced CT angiography.

RESULTS

Aortic plaque and calcification were detected only in patients who were at least 58 years old. The presence of aortic plaque was predictive of obstructive CAD, independent of coronary artery calcification. The sensitivity of aortic plaque (raised lesions) for obstructive CAD was 89% in patients at least 58 years old, and the specificity was 63%. Aortic calcification had a sensitivity of 56% and a specificity of 72% for diagnosis of obstructive CAD.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that aortic plaque detected with contrast-enhanced electron-beam CT was a more consistent predictor of obstructive CAD than other independent aortic variables. Aortic calcification depicted on nonenhanced CT images was highly specific for obstructive CAD.

Measurement of the RT interval on ECG records during electron-beam CT

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The R wave of the electrocardiogram is used widely as a trigger for cardiac imaging. This study was designed to determine the optimal interval between the R wave and end systole for triggering of electron-beam computed tomography (CT) in a group of patients with various heart rates who are undergoing assessment for coronary artery calcification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 862 consecutive asymptomatic patients referred for screening with electron-beam CT for coronary artery calcification were enrolled in the study. Patients' R-R, RT, and PR intervals were measured by using the software of the CT console computer. Correlation coefficients were computed and linear regression analyses were performed for all intervals measured. Results were analyzed according to patient age (three subgroups), sex (two subgroups), and heart rate (nine subgroups). Separate formulas for calculating the length of RT intervals in men and in women were developed.

RESULTS

After correction for heart rate, a significant difference was found in mean RT and PR intervals between women and men, with the mean intervals in women being longer (P < .001). No significant difference was found in these intervals within the three age-defined subgroups (< or = 40, 41-60, and >60 years; P > .05). However, significant negative correlations were found between heart rates and the lengths of all measured intervals. The results of statistical analysis indicate that most of the variation in the R-R interval with different heart rates occurred in diastole and that the duration of systole was relatively constant.

CONCLUSION

For optimal cardiac imaging, triggering should take place in late systole, avoiding the RT interval variability that occurs in diastole.

Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) are both suitable for non-invasive identification of coronary stenoses.

OBJECTIVE

To compare intravenous coronary EBCT angiography (EBCTA) and MSCT angiography (MSCTA) with regard to image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

EBCTA was done using an Imatron C-150 XP scanner in 101 patients following a standard protocol (slice thickness 3 mm, overlap 1 mm, acquisition time 100 ms, prospective ECG trigger). For MSCTA in a different set of 91 patients (using a Siemens Somatom Plus4VZ scanner), the whole volume of the heart was covered in a spiral technique by four simultaneous detector rows. Using retrospective ECG gating, the raw data were reconstructed in (mean (SD)) 215 (12) axial slices acquired in diastole (slice thickness 1.25 mm, overlap 0.5 mm, acquisition time 250 ms/slice).

RESULTS

With EBCTA, 76% of predetermined coronary segments in a nine segment model could be assessed with diagnostic image quality, and with MSCTA, 82%. A low contrast to noise ratio with EBCTA, and the presence of motion artefacts with MSCTA were the main reasons for inadequate image quality. Using conventional angiography as the gold standard, 77% of stenoses of > 50% could be identified correctly with EBCTA and 82% with MSCTA. Significant stenoses were correctly ruled out in 93% of segments with EBCTA, and in 96% of segments with MSCTA. The average contrast to noise ratio was higher with MSCTA than with EBCTA (9.4 v 6.5; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EBCTA and MSCTA show similarly high levels of accuracy for determining and ruling out significant coronary artery stenoses. MSCTA is capable of providing good image quality in more coronary segments than EBCTA because of its better contrast to noise ratio and higher spatial resolution. Motion artefacts seen at heart rates of > 75 beats/min and a higher radiation exposure are the main limitations of MSCTA.

Coronary artery calcium: accuracy and reproducibility of measurements with multi-detector row CT--assessment of effects of different thresholds and quantification methods

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of different thresholds and quantification methods on the accuracy and reproducibility of coronary calcium measurements with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cardiac CT phantom containing predetermined calcified cylinders was scanned. Calcium volume and mass were measured at various threshold values ranging from 80 to 230 HU. In 32 patients, two consecutive CT scans were obtained, and the coronary artery calcium score, volume, and mass were measured by one observer at 130- and 90-HU thresholds. Correlation analysis and analysis of variance were performed to evaluate the measurement errors in the phantom study and the interscan variability in the clinical study.

RESULTS

In the phantom, mass measurement error varied with threshold and calcium density (P <.01). Mass error was strongly correlated with volume error (r = 0.91, P <.01) but with a much smaller range. In the clinical study, interscan variability of mass measurements was significantly lower than that with other measurement methods for both patients and individual vessels. For the patients, the mean interscan variability of calcium score, volume, and mass at the 130-HU threshold was 20.4%, 13.9%, and 9.3%, respectively. For all methods, interscan variability was not significantly different between the 130- and 90-HU thresholds (P >.05).

CONCLUSION

The mass measurement is more accurate, less variable, and more reproducible in coronary calcium quantification than are measurements with other algorithms. Accurate quantification of calcium in each calcified plaque may require that the threshold be set individually, depending on the calcium density.

Noninvasive visualization of atherosclerotic plaque with electron beam and multislice spiral computed tomography

As an alternative to intracoronary modalities, electron beam computed tomography (EBCT) and multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) are able to noninvasively image the coronary arteries. In addition to stenosis detection by imaging the vessel lumen, MSCT has the ability to visualize the coronary artery wall. By using computed tomography (CT), the various components of atherosclerotic plaque may be distinguished and characterized, which holds the promise of, eventually, identifying vulnerable plaque.

Comparison of image quality in contrast-enhanced coronary-artery visualization by electron beam tomography and retrospectively electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral computed tomography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the image quality of electron beam tomography (EBT) and multislice spiral CT (MSCT) for coronary artery visualization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two groups of 30 patients without coronary stenoses were studied by MSCT (4 x 1 mm collimation) or EBT (3 mm slice thickness). Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), overall length of the visualized arteries and vessel length free of motion artifacts were measured.

RESULTS

Length of visualized arteries was equal in MSCT and EBT. In EBT, longer segments were depicted free of motion artifacts (MSCT: 73%, EBT: 92% of visualized length, P< 0.001) and CNR was significantly higher than in MSCT (15.4 vs. 9.0; P< 0.001). In both modalities, vessel diameters correlated closely to quantitative coronary angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

EBT and MSCT permit reliable coronary artery visualization and measurement of vessel diameters. For the used scan protocol, MSCT images had a lower CNR and were more frequently affected by motion.