Effects of amiodarone and its active metabolite desethylamiodarone on the ventricular defibrillation threshold

Development, validation and long-term evaluation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantification of amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and mexiletine in human plasma and serum

Amiodarone and mexiletine are used for ventricular arrhythmias, for which a combination therapy of both anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) is not uncommon. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can be beneficial for clinical guidance of therapy, especially to correctly identify adverse events. Desethylamiodarone, the active metabolite of amiodarone, accumulates over time and is associated with serious adverse events. Therefore, simultaneous TDM for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and mexiletine is advantageous in clinical practice. The presented LC-MS/MS method was validated for selectivity, matrix effect, linearity, accuracy, precision, carry-over and stability. The method was continuously evaluated during eight months of clinical use. The method was shown to be linear within the measured range of 0.1 to 10 mg/L for each component. The matrix effect was considered negligible. No interfering responses were found for amiodarone, desethylamiodarone and the isotopic-labeled internal standards. A constant and reproducible within-run contribution of 45.3 %, originating from the system, was identified for mexiletine. The systemic contribution to the peak area of the lowest quantifiable concentration of mexiletine affected the selectivity and carry-over effect measurements. Multiple measurements showed that regression adjusted concentrations were accurate and reproducible, indicating calibration correction was applicable. Sample stability was found to be within limits for all storage conditions and freeze-thaw cycles. Furthermore, long-term method evaluation with external controls resulted in stable measurements with a percentage coefficient of variance between 1.3 % and 6.3 %. The presented practical and reliable method is applicable for clinical TDM and will allow clinical practitioners to guide drug therapy of amiodarone and mexiletine.

aMplitude spectral area of ventricular fibrillation and amiOdarone Study in patients with out-of-hospital cArdIaC arrest. The MOSAIC study

Objective

Antiarrhythmic drugs are recommended for out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF). Amplitude Spectral Area (AMSA) of VF is a quantitative waveform measure that describes the amplitude-weighted mean frequency of VF, it correlates with intramyocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration, it is a predictor of shock efficacy and an emerging indicator to guide defibrillation and resuscitation efforts. How AMSA might be influenced by amiodarone administration is unknown.

Methods

In this international multicentre observational study, all OHCAs receiving at least one shock were included. AMSA values were calculated by retrospectively analysing the pre-shock ECG interval of 2 s. Multivariable models were run and a propensity score based on the probability of receiving amiodarone was created to compare two randomly matched samples.

Results

2,077 shocks were included: 1,407 in the amiodarone group and 670 in the non-amiodarone group. AMSA values were lower in the amiodarone group [8.8 (6-12.7) mV·Hz vs. 9.8 (6-14) mV·Hz, p = 0.035]. In two randomly matched propensity score-based groups of 261 shocks, AMSA was lower in the amiodarone group [8.2 (5.8-13.5) mV·Hz vs. 9.6 (5.6-11.6), p = 0.042]. AMSA was a predictor of shock success in both groups but the predictive power was lower in the amiodarone group [Area Under the Curve (AUC) non-amiodarone group 0.812, 95%CI: 0.78-0.841 vs. AUC amiodarone group 0.706, 95%CI: 0.68-0.73; p < 0.001].

Conclusions

Amiodarone administration was independently associated with the probability of recording lower values of AMSA. In patients who have received amiodarone during cardiac arrest the predictive value of AMSA for shock success is significantly lower, but still statistically significant.

Ibutilide Reduces Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold and Organizes Ventricular Fibrillation Activation in Canine Heart Failure Model

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of class III antiarrhythmic agents (amiodarone vs. ibutilide) on ventricular fibrillation (VF) and hemodynamic status in a canine heart failure (HF) model.

METHODS

A total of 12 beagles were used to establish the HF model by rapid pacing for 4 consecutive weeks. These canines were randomly divided into two groups based on the administration of ibutilide and amiodarone. A 12 × 12 unipolar electrode plaque was used for ventricular epicardial mapping, and a 6-electrode plunge needle was inserted for ventricular transmural mapping. The restitution curve was estimated from activation recovery intervals (ARIs) by pacing from the plaque electrodes before and after drug administration. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) and VF activation patterns, including the activation rate, cycle length (VF-CL) and the transmural dispersion of the activation rate, were evaluated and the hemodynamic parameters were mearsured and compared before and after drug administration.

RESULTS

Compared to HF baseline, ibutilide administration has markedly decreased the DFT by 28% (18 ± 2 J vs. 13 ± 2.7 J, P < 0.01) without affecting the canine's hemodynamics (mean arterial pressure 91 ± 15 mmHg vs. 92 ± 17 mmHg, P > 0.05). Furthermore, VF activation pattern became more organized, and spontaneous termination was observed only after ibutilide administration. Conversely, amiodarone has significantly compromised the hemodynamic status (mean arterial pressure 92 ± 6.1 mmHg vs. 52 ± 11.6 mmHg, P < 0.05), but did not alter the DFT (17 ± 2.3 J vs. 16 ± 2.0 J, P > 0.05). Compared to pre-medication, both ibutilide and amiodarone have significantly prolonged the VERP (178 ± 9.6 ms vs. 208 ± 8.9 ms, P < 0.05; 185 ± 10.5 ms vs. 202 ± 7.5 ms, P < 0.05, respectively) and reduced the dispersion of refractoriness, the maximal slope of restitution curve, and the epicardial dispersion during pacing. Additionally, both drugs have significantly increased the VF-CL and reduced the transmural dispersion of the VF activation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Ibutilide had potential antifibrillatory properties, which was shown by decreasing the DFT and organizing the VF activation in HF, and with no apparent impact on the hemodynamic status. In contrast, intravenous amiodarone administration demonstrated prominent negative effects on the hemodynamic status possibly by affecting the myocardial contractility before and after defibrillation but did not alter the DFT.

Coronary vein defibrillator coil placement in patients with high defibrillation thresholds

BACKGROUND

Elevated defibrillation threshold (DFT) occurs in 2%-6% of patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. Adding a defibrillation coil in the coronary sinus (CS) or its branches can result in substantial reductions in the mean DFT. However, data regarding acute success and long-term stability remain lacking. We report our experience with this bailout strategy.

METHODS

Patients with elevated DFT at implantation (safety margin at implantation <10 J) and those with failed ICD shocks for ventricular arrhythmias (VA) referred for high DFT underwent placement of an additional defibrillation coil in the CS. DFT testing was performed at the completion of the implantation procedure. External potentially reversible factors were excluded. High-output devices were systematically used.

RESULTS

Four patients with high DFT at implantation and two with several failed shock attempts underwent placement of a defibrillation coil in the CS. Mean age was 41.8 (23-78). They presented a mean LVEF of 21% (15-30), QRS-complex duration of 109.8 milliseconds (87-168), body surface area of 1.96 m2 (1.45-2.58), and a mean R wave of 16.3 mV (8-27). Defibrillation coil implantation in the CS (final shocking configuration of right ventricle as anode and left ventricle (LV) plus can as cathode) was associated with successful DFT testing in all. Three patients had a concomitant LV lead for biventricular pacing. During a mean follow-up of 54.67 months (10-118), two patients experienced successful ICD shocks for VA (one of them also presented inappropriate shocks because of the fast conducting atrial fibrillation).

CONCLUSIONS

Positioning of a defibrillation coil in the CS can result in a substantial reduction in mean DFT and associates with optimal long-term stability.

Adherence to Monitoring Guidelines of Amiodarone Adverse Reactions

BACKGROUND

Amiodarone treatment frequently causes adverse reactions. Clinical guidelines warrant a comprehensive assessment prior to chronic treatment with amiodarone and repeated monitoring for the appearance of adverse reactions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate adherence to these guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records of adult patients treated with oral amiodarone for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

One hundred patient records were analyzed; 97% of patients were evaluated for thyroid and liver functions prior to treatment. Liver functions were properly monitored every 6 months in 96% of patients and thyroid function in only 59%. Most (84%) patients completed a chest X-ray before treatment; only 2% completed a respiratory function test. None have performed a chest X-ray annually. Sixty-four percent of the patients were examined by an ophthalmologist prior to treatment; periodic ophthalmic surveillance was not consistent. Neurological and dermatological evaluations were not recorded for any of the patients, unless symptoms appeared. Only 50% were adherent to annual cardiac reassessment.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to recommended clinical guidelines for monitoring amiodarone adverse reactions is poor. Interventions to improve compliance with these guidelines are needed.

The Selective Late Sodium Current Inhibitor Eleclazine, Unlike Amiodarone, Does Not Alter Defibrillation Threshold or Dominant Frequency of Ventricular Fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

We examined the effects of the selective late INa inhibitor eleclazine on the 50% probability of successful defibrillation (DFT50) before and after administration of amiodarone to determine its suitability for use in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 20 anesthetized pigs, transvenous active-fixation cardiac defibrillation leads were fluoroscopically positioned into right ventricular apex through jugular vein. ICDs were implanted subcutaneously. Dominant frequency of ventricular fibrillation was analyzed by fast Fourier transform. The measurements were made before drug administration (control), and at 40 minutes after vehicle, eleclazine (2 mg/kg, i.v., bolus over 15 minutes), or subsequent/single amiodarone administration (10 mg/kg, i.v., bolus over 10 minutes). Eleclazine did not alter DFT50, dominant frequency, heart rate, or mean arterial pressure (MAP). Subsequent amiodarone increased DFT50 (P = 0.006), decreased dominant frequency (P = 0.022), and reduced heart rate (P = 0.031) with no change in MAP. Amiodarone alone increased DFT50 (P = 0.005; NS compared to following eleclazine) and decreased dominant frequency (P = 0.003; NS compared to following eleclazine).

CONCLUSION

Selective late INa inhibition with eleclazine does not alter DFT50 or dominant frequency of ventricular fibrillation when administered alone or in combination with amiodarone. Accordingly, eleclazine would not be anticipated to affect the margin of defibrillation safety in patients with ICDs.

Systematic Review of Defibrillation Threshold Testing at De Novo Implantation

Background—

Recent results from the largest multicenter randomized trial (Shockless IMPLant Evaluation [SIMPLE]) on defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing suggest that while shock testing seems safe, it does not reduce the risk of failed shocks or prolong survival. A contemporary systematic review of DFT versus no-DFT testing at the time of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation was performed to evaluate the current evidence and to assess the impact of the SIMPLE study.

Methods and Results—

Electronic searches were performed using 6 databases from their inception to March 2014. Relevant studies investigating implant DFT were identified. Data were extracted and analyzed according to predefined clinical end points. Predefined outcomes for interrogation were all-cause mortality, composite end point of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator efficacy (arrhythmic deaths and ineffective shocks), and composite safety end point (the sum of complications recorded at 30 days). Meta-analysis was performed including 13 studies and 9740 patients. No significant differences between DFT versus no-DFT cohorts were found in terms of all-cause mortality (risk ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–1.15; P =0.41), composite efficacy outcome (risk ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–3.37; P =0.51), and 30-day postimplant complications (risk ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–1.60; P =0.29). No significant difference was found in the trends observed when the results of the SIMPLE study were excluded or included.

Conclusions—

This systematic review of contemporary data suggests a modest average effect of DFT, if any, in terms of mortality, shock efficacy, or safety. Therefore, DFT testing should no longer be compulsory during de novo implantation. However, DFT testing may still be clinically relevant in specific patient populations.

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study (ROC-ALPS): Rationale and methodology behind an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest antiarrhythmic drug trial

BACKGROUND

Despite their wide use, whether antiarrhythmic drugs improve survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is not known. The ROC-ALPS is evaluating the effectiveness of these drugs for OHCA due to shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT).

METHODS

ALPS will randomize 3,000 adults across North America with nontraumatic OHCA, persistent or recurring VF/VT after ≥1 shock, and established vascular access to receive up to 450 mg amiodarone, 180 mg lidocaine, or placebo in the field using a double-blind protocol, along with standard resuscitation measures. The designated target population is all eligible randomized recipients of any dose of ALPS drug whose initial OHCA rhythm was VF/VT. A safety analysis includes all randomized patients regardless of their eligibility, initial arrhythmia, or actual receipt of ALPS drug. The primary outcome of ALPS is survival to hospital discharge; a secondary outcome is functional survival at discharge assessed as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤3.

RESULTS

The principal aim of ALPS is to determine if survival is improved by amiodarone compared with placebo; secondary aim is to determine if survival is improved by lidocaine vs placebo and/or by amiodarone vs lidocaine. Prioritizing comparisons in this manner acknowledges where differences in outcome are most expected based on existing knowledge. Each aim also represents a clinically relevant comparison between treatments that is worth investigating.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from ALPS will provide important information about the choice and value of antiarrhythmic therapies for VF/VT arrest with direct implications for resuscitation guidelines and clinical practice.

Overview of large animal myocardial infarction models (review)

There are several experimental models for the in vivo investigation of myocardial infarction (MI) in small (mouse, rat) and large animals (dog, pig, sheep and baboons). The application of large animal models raises ethical concerns, the design of experiments needs longer follow-up times, requiring proper breeding and housing conditions, therefore resulting in higher cost, than in vitro or small animal studies. On the other hand, the relevance of large animal models is very important, since they mostly resemble to human physiological and pathophysiological processes. The first main difference among MI models is the method of induction (open or closed chest, e.g. surgical or catheter based); the second main difference is the presence or absence of reperfusion. The former (i.e. reperfused MI) allows the investigation of reperfusion injury and new catheter based techniques during percutaneous coronary interventions, while the latter (i.e. nonreperfused MI) serves as a traditional coronary occlusion model, to test the effects of new pharmacological agents and biological therapies, as cell therapy. The reperfused and nonreperfused myocardial infarction has different outcomes, regarding left ventricular function, remodelling, subsequent heart failure, aneurysm formation and mortality. Our aim was to review the literature and report our findings regarding experimental MI models, regarding the differences among species, methods, reproducibility and interpretation.

The effects of acute amiodarone on short- and long-duration ventricular defibrillation threshold in canines

INTRODUCTION

Some studies have shown that the defibrillation threshold (DFT) differs between short-duration ventricular fibrillation (SDVF, <1 minute) and long-duration ventricular fibrillation (LDVF > 1 minute). The goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of acute intravenous amiodarone on SDVF-DFT and LDVF-DFT and its possible mechanism as well.

METHODS

Twelve open-chest dogs were randomly divided into 2 groups (control group, normal saline, 10 mL·kg·h maintenance, n = 6; amiodarone group, loading dose 10 mg/kg over 10 minutes, maintenance dose 5 mg·kg·h, n = 6). VF was electrically induced and recorded with a 12 × 12 unipolar electrode plaque (2-mm spacing) sutured on the left ventricular epicardium and a plunge needle (6 unipolar electrode) inserted in the left ventricular apex. The DFTs of SDVF and LDVF were determined 20 seconds and 3 minutes after VF induction, respectively. Restitution was estimated from activation recovery intervals during pacing from the plaque and plunge needle electrodes. The activation rate was estimated by Fast Fourier Transform analysis of VF at same electrodes. The VF cycle length was defined as the reciprocal of the activation rate. The epicardial and transmural dispersion of the maximal slope of the restitution curve and VF cycle length of SDVF and LDVF were calculated, respectively.

RESULTS

: In controls, LDVF-DFT was higher than SDVF-DFT (645 ± 61 vs. 520 ± 63 V, P < 0.01). Amiodarone did not significantly alter SDVF-DFTs (496 ± 49 vs. 552 ± 69 V, P > 0.05) but decreased LDVF-DFT by 31% (P < 0.01). Compared with control, amiodarone significantly reduced the maximum slope of the restitution curve (1.12 ± 0.35 vs. 0.81 ± 0.25, P = 0.03) and its epicardial dispersion (0.32 ± 0.07 vs. 0.24 ± 0.04,coefficient of variation, P = 0.017). Amiodarone significantly increased the SDVF-CL (92 ± 8 vs. 99 ± 10 milliseconds, P < 0.01) and epicardial dispersion 0.14 ± 0.06 vs. 0.18 ± 0.05, P < 0.01. Amiodarone did not change the LDVF-CL (228 ± 12 vs. 226 ± 10 milliseconds, P > 0.05) or epicardial dispersion (0.17 ± 0.03 vs. 0.15 ± 0.02, P > 0.05) compared with control. However, the drug significantly decreased the transmural dispersion of LDVF-CL (68 ± 28 vs. 39 ± 14 milliseconds, P < 0.01) without changing the transmural dispersion of SDVF-CL (29 ± 22 vs. 32 ± 30 milliseconds, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute amiodarone significantly decreased the LDVF-DFT. The decreased transmural dispersion of LDVF-CL by amiodarone might contribute to the decreased LDVF-DFT.

[Is the determination of the defibrillation threshold in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator still required?]

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative testing of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is time consuming and associated with risks. In the present study, we elucidated whether the initial implantation of an ICD with high energy output makes intraoperative defibrillation threshold testing (DFTT) unnecessary even though antiarrhythmic (AA) therapy is needed in the future.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients (94 men, 17 women) receiving an ICD with subsequent AA therapy (mexiletine, amiodarone, sotalol, flecainide) were analyzed retrospectively. DFT was performed during ICD implantation and after AA drug therapy. In a second step, DFT results from the study cohort were analyzed for implantation of virtual ICDs with either low (≤ 30 J, LOD), intermediate (34 J, IOD), or high energy output (36 J, HOD).

RESULTS

In the study cohort, all patients reached the safety margin (SM) of 10 J between DFT and maximal shock energy of the ICD. After loading of AA agents, 6 patients (12%) with a LOD, 3 patients (11%) with an IOD, and 3 (13%) patients with a HOD failed the 10 J SM. Using virtual ICDs, 6 (5.5%) patients with a LOD, 1 patient (1%) with an IOD, and no patients with a HOD would have failed the 10 J SM. After loading of AA agents, 18 patients (16%) with a virtual LOD, 12 patients (10.8%) with an IOD, and still 9 patients (8%) with a HOD would have failed the 10 J SM.

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrate that the 10 J SM would have been achieved intraoperatively in all patients with virtual HOD ICDs. Thus, determination of the DFT during implantation does not seem to be obligatory. However, in patients receiving AA agents, DFT testing is still required.

Pharmacologically active metabolites of currently marketed drugs: potential resources for new drug discovery and development

Biotransformation is the major clearance mechanism of therapeutic agents from the body. Biotransformation is known not only to facilitate the elimination of drugs by changing the molecular structure to more hydrophilic, but also lead to pharmacological inactivation of therapeutic compounds. However, in some cases, the biotransformation of drugs can lead to the generation of pharmacologically active metabolites, responsible for the pharmacological actions. This review provides an update of the kinds of pharmacologically active metabolites and some of their individual pharmacological and pharmacokinetic aspects, and describes their importance as resources for drug discovery and development.

Nifekalant versus lidocaine for in-hospital shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of nifekalant, a pure class III anti-arrhythmic drug, and lidocaine in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between August 2005 and March 2008, we conducted a prospective, two-arm, cluster observational study, in which participating hospitals were pre-registered either to the nifekalant arm or the lidocaine arm. Patients were enrolled if they had in-hospital VF or VT resistant to at least two defibrillation shocks. Congenital or drug-induced long QT syndrome was excluded. The primary end-point was termination of VF or VT with/without additional shock. The secondary end-points were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 1-month survival and survival to hospital discharge. We also assessed the frequency of adverse events, including asystole, pulseless electrical activity and torsade de pointes.

RESULTS

In total, 55 patients were enrolled. After nifekalant, 22 of 27 patients showed termination of VF or VT, as compared with 15 of 28 patients treated with lidocaine with/without additional shock (odds ratio (OR): 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-13.0; P=0.03). Twenty-three of 27 patients given nifekalant showed ROSC, as compared with 15 of 28 patients given lidocaine (OR: 5.0; 95% CI: 1.4-18.2; P=0.01). There was no difference in 1-month survival or survival to hospital discharge between the nifekalant and lidocaine arms. There was a higher incidence of asystole with lidocaine (7 of 28 patients) than with nifekalant (0 of 27 patients) (P=0.005). Torsade de pointes was not observed.

CONCLUSION

Nifekalant was more effective than lidocaine for termination of arrhythmia and for ROSC in patients with shock-resistant in-hospital VF or VT (umin-CTR No. UMIN 000001781).

The dilemma of ICD implant testing

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) has been induced at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implant to ensure reliable sensing, detection, and defibrillation. Despite its risks, the value was self-evident for early ICDs: failure of defibrillation was common, recipients had a high risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or VF, and the only therapy for rapid VT or VF was a shock. Today, failure of defibrillation is rare, the risk of VT/VF is lower in some recipients, antitachycardia pacing is applied for fast VT, and vulnerability testing permits assessment of defibrillation efficacy without inducing VF in most patients. This review reappraises ICD implant testing. At implant, defibrillation success is influenced by both predictable and unpredictable factors, including those related to the patient, ICD system, drugs, and complications. For left pectoral implants of high-output ICDs, the probability of passing a 10 J safety margin is approximately 95%, the probability that a maximum output shock will defibrillate is approximately 99%, and the incidence of system revision based on testing is < or = 5%. Bayes' Theorem predicts that implant testing identifies < or = 50% of patients at high risk for unsuccessful defibrillation. Most patients who fail implant criteria have false negative tests and may undergo unnecessary revision of their ICD systems. The first-shock success rate for spontaneous VT/VF ranges from 83% to 93%, lower than that for induced VF. Thus, shocks for spontaneous VT/VF fail for reasons that are not evaluated at implant. Whether system revision based on implant testing improves this success rate is unknown. The risks of implant testing include those related to VF and those related to shocks alone. The former may be due to circulatory arrest alone or the combination of circulatory arrest and shocks. Vulnerability testing reduces risks related to VF, but not those related to shocks. Mortality from implant testing probably is 0.1-0.2%. Overall, VF should be induced to assess sensing in approximately 5% of ICD recipients. Defibrillation or vulnerability testing is indicated in 20-40% of recipients who can be identified as having a higher-than-usual probability of an inadequate defibrillation safety margin based on patient-specific factors. However, implant testing is too risky in approximately 5% of recipients and may not be worth the risks in 10-30%. In 25-50% of ICD recipients, testing cannot be identified as either critical or contraindicated.

Undesirable effects of citrus juice on the pharmacokinetics of drugs: focus on recent studies

It is well known that intake of grapefruit juice affects the pharmacokinetics of various kinds of drugs. It has been reported that other citrus juices also interact with certain drugs. To re-evaluate citrus juice-drug interactions based on currently available evidence, a literature search was conducted for new and updated information since the grapefruit juice-drug interaction was last reviewed in 1998. MEDLINE (1998-October 2004) was accessed and more than 200 reports were found. The effects of grapefruit juice ingestion on the pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs have been reported for 40 drugs since the reviews published in 1998. Increases in either area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) or maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) were found with 34 of these, the major mechanism being considered to be inactivation of intestinal cytochrome P450 3A4, a so-called mechanism-based inhibition. Although recent reports point to the inhibitory effects of grapefruit juice on the function of P-glycoprotein, which transports substrates from enterocytes back into the lumen, the contribution to the bioavailability of drugs that are substrates of P-glycoprotein has not been established yet. Dramatic decreases in AUC and C(max) for two drugs in association with grapefruit juice ingestion has been reported and, in these cases, inhibitory effects on organic anion transporting polypeptide, which mediates absorption from the intestinal lumen to enterocytes, might be involved. Other citrus juices such as Seville (sour) orange juice and commonly ingested varieties of orange juice also showed significant effects on the AUC and C(max) of some drugs. Although the situation is complex and uncertainties remain, we recommend that patients avoid citrus juice intake while taking medications and that healthcare providers advise against citrus juice intake in this setting until any interactions with subject drugs can be clarified in clinical studies.

Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to (1) determine how often implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) system modifications were needed to obtain an adequate safety margin for defibrillation, (2) identify how often and for what indications defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing was not performed, and (3) identify factors predicting the need for modification.

BACKGROUND

Ventricular fibrillation (VF) typically is induced at the time of ICD insertion. Although DFT testing often is minimized, a safety margin of 10 J has been utilized as a standard of care. However, current devices offer technology such as biphasic waveforms and high outputs, and the need for testing has been questioned.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of the last 1,139 patients undergoing initial ICD placement, generator replacement, or revision.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (6.2%) were identified as having an unacceptably high DFT (<10 J safety margin) requiring intervention, and some required >1 modification. Use of a high-output device alone was not enough to obtain an adequate DFT in 48% (34/71) of patients who required modifications (3% of the total population). No arrhythmia inductions were performed in 54 patients (4.7%) because of well-defined clinical conditions. Patients who required system modification had a lower ejection fraction, were younger, were less likely to have coronary artery disease, were more likely to be undergoing upgrade/generator replacement, and were more likely to be taking amiodarone. Long-term mortality was not different between the group of patients who required modification compared with those who did not (17% vs 20%, P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine VF induction and documentation of effective defibrillation still remains a reasonable part of ICD placement because an inadequate safety margin may occur in >6% of patients. The incidence of patients who were inappropriate for testing based on well-defined clinical conditions is small (<5%) in this unselected large series. Although some clinical features may predict the need for system modification, additional studies are needed to better define "acceptable efficacy" of ICDs in preventing sudden death prior to altering these standards in selected patients.

Time course of fibrillation and defibrillation thresholds after an intravenous bolus of amiodarone--an experimental study

Experimental studies have described an increase in ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) by intravenous amiodarone. The aim of this study was to examine the early time course of changes in VFT and defibrillation thresholds (DFT) after an intravenous bolus of amiodarone in an experimental pig model of transient myocardial ischemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

VFT and relative effective ventricular refractory period (ERP) were measured in 15 anaesthetized open-chest pigs after 3 min of regional coronary ischaemia before (time 0) and 2, 15, 30, 60, and 90 min after the intravenous injection of normal saline (group A, n = 5) or amiodarone, 5 mg/kg over 15 s (group B, n = 10). DFT was measured by increasing the strength of DC shocks until defibrillation was accomplished. Amiodarone caused an increase in VFT, starting at 2 min after the infusion (11.4 +/- 8.4 mA versus 9.2 +/- 4.6 mA, P = 0.03), became significant at 15 min (13.7 +/- 6.5 mA, P = 0.009), continued to rise at 30 min (34.2 +/- 28.7 mA, P = 0.03) and reached a plateau at 60 min (50.3 +/- 37.8 mA, P = 0.008). An increase was also observed in the ERP (204 +/- 25 ms at 2 min versus 197 +/- 26 ms at baseline, P = 0.074, 211 +/- 38 ms at 15 min, P = 0.084, 212 +/- 40 ms at 30 min, P = 0.037, 220 +/- 34 ms at 60 min, P = 0.002, and 227 +/- 32 ms at 90 min, P = 0.008). No change was observed in DFT after amiodarone administration. No significant change in VFT, ERP, or DFT occurred in the control group.

CONCLUSION

In this porcine model, the intravenous administration of amiodarone increased VFT and ERP over 60 min after the injection, without effect on DFT.

Food-drug interaction: grapefruit juice augments drug bioavailability--mechanism, extent and relevance

More than a decade has passed since it was unintentionally discovered that grapefruit juice interacts with certain drugs. The coadministration of these drugs with grapefruit juice can markedly elevate drug bioavailability, and can alter pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the drug. The predominant mechanism for this interaction is the inhibition of cytochrome P-450 3A4 in the small intestine, resulting in a significant reduction of drug presystemic metabolism. An additional mechanism is, presumably, the inhibition of P-glycoprotein, a transporter that carries drug from the enterocyte back to the gut lumen, resulting in a further increase in the fraction of drug absorbed. Some calcium channel antagonists, benzodiazepines, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and cyclosporine are the most affected drugs. A single exposure to one glass of the juice can usually produce the maximal magnitude of the interaction. The data available so far, concerning this interaction and its clinical implications, are reviewed in this article. It is likely that more information regarding this interaction will accumulate in the future, and awareness of such is necessary for achieving optimal drug therapy.

Interactions of antiarrhythmic drugs and implantable devices in controlling ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have proven highly successful in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Despite the efficacy of the ICD in terminating ventricular arrhythmias, antiarrhythmic drugs remain an important adjunct to ICD therapy. The use of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with the ICD is synergistic in terms of beneficial effects, but also has the potential for some adverse interactions. Knowledge and recognition of these potential interactions is important for any physician managing patients with an ICD. This review summarizes the benefits and adverse effects of ICD in combination with antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and provides guidelines to ensure safe application of this hybrid therapy.

The effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns and defibrillation threshold during ventricular fibrillation in dogs

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of acute and chronic amiodarone on activation patterns during ventricular fibrillation (VF), ventricular effective refractory period (VERP) and defibrillation threshold (DFT).

BACKGROUND

Acute and chronic amiodarone may act through different mechanisms.

METHODS

The VERP, VF activation patterns and DFT were determined in 24 dogs. Twelve dogs received acute intravenous amiodarone (10 mg/kg, n = 6) or saline (n = 6), and 12 dogs received chronic oral amiodarone (20 mg/kg/day, n = 6) or placebo (n = 6). Epicardial VF activation patterns were recorded with 504 electrodes. Quantitative descriptors of VF were calculated.

RESULTS

The DFT was unchanged by acute or chronic amiodarone. Although chronic amiodarone significantly extended the VERP, acute amiodarone did not. In the mapped region, acute and chronic amiodarone decreased the number of VF wavefronts by 42% and 60%. Acute amiodarone decreased conduction block by 22%, while chronic amiodarone increased block by 41% but decreased wave fractionation by 50%. Both chronic and acute amiodarone increased the size of the core of re-entrant circuits and decreased the incidence of re-entry by 44% and 57%; however, chronic amiodarone increased wavelength, while acute amiodarone did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither acute nor chronic amiodarone change the DFT. While both acute and chronic amiodarone decrease the number of wavefronts, decrease the incidence of re-entry and increase the size of re-entrant cores in the mapped region during VF, they achieve these antiarrhythmic effects through different electrophysiologic mechanisms. Chronic amiodarone prolonged the VF cycle length and slowed conduction velocity, indicating it increased the wavelength and/or the excitable gap.

A comparison of two individual amiodarone regimens to placebo in open heart surgery patients

BACKGROUND

This study compares the ability of two oral amiodarone regimens to reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) as compared with the placebo among elderly open heart surgery (OHS) patients receiving beta blockade.

METHODS

This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 220 patients undergoing OHS. Patients (average age, 73 years) received 7 g of oral amiodarone more than 10 days starting 5 days before OHS (slow load; n = 56), a 6 g oral amiodarone regimen more than 6 days starting 1 day before OHS (fast load; n = 64), or matching placebo in one of the two previously mentioned regimens (n = 100).

RESULTS

Patients receiving the slow load amiodarone regimen had a significant reduction in the risk of AF (48.4%; p = 0.013), AF lasting more than 24 hours (76.5%; p = 0.003), symptomatic AF (90.0%; p = 0.002), and recurrent AF (64.5%; p = 0.025) as compared with the placebo. Patients receiving the fast load amiodarone regimen had significant reductions in the risk of AF lasting more than 24 hours (52.6%; p = 0.038) and symptomatic AF (65.0%; p = 0.024), but the incidence of any AF or any recurrence of AF only showed a trend toward significance (34.0% and 45.5%; p = 0.054 and 0.09, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral amiodarone in a slow loading regimen provides significant suppression of all AF factors and can be used when a patient has started it at least 5 days before OHS. If a patient has less than 5 days before OHS, the fast loading regimen is an efficacious alternative as it provides significant benefits in preventing AF from lasting more than 24 hours and for preventing symptomatic AF. Both regimens were well tolerated and safe in elderly patients receiving beta blockade according to the hospital's standard protocol.

Advanced cardiac life support antiarrhythmic drugs

As exemplified in this discussion of ACLS antiarrhythmic drugs, the evidence-based evaluation process has created a high standard for the acceptance and ranking of therapies for cardiac arrest. This process also has identified critical areas needing further investigation, fostered a healthy sense of discomfort with the adequacy of our present interventions for cardiac arrest, and hopefully will continue to spur the science while sifting the dogma out of CPR.

Amiodarone in the new AHA guidelines for ventricular tachyarrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

To delineate amiodarone's role in the new American Heart Association guidelines for ventricular tachyarrhythmias, review the literature that supports the use of amiodarone in ventricular tachyarrhythmias, describe the pharmaceutical properties of amiodarone and elucidate their clinical implications, and discuss the dosing, preparation, and administration of amiodarone.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE (1966-October 2000) database and EMBASE Drugs and Pharmacology database (1980-October 2000) was performed. References from published articles and tertiary references were used to gather additional data.

DATA EXTRACTION

All articles were screened, and pertinent studies were identified and evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Recent trials have demonstrated amiodarone's usefulness in the setting of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Based on these investigations and contrary to past guidelines, amiodarone is included in the 2000 advanced cardiovascular life support guidelines as a possible agent for hemodynamically stable monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), non-QT prolonged polymorphic VT, and ventricular fibrillation (VF)/pulseless VT. Although not specifically evaluated in the setting of hemodynamically stable monomorphic VT and non-QT prolonged polymorphic VT, investigations by the intravenous Amiodarone Multicenter Trial Group and other clinical trials make amiodarone an acceptable choice for these arrythmia categories. The results of the ARREST (Resuscitation of Refractory Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias) trial prove amiodarone to be the antiarrhythmic of choice for VF/pulseless VT.

CONCLUSIONS

Amiodarone is classified as a IIb therapeutic intervention for all three arrhythmia categories, which makes it an acceptable, safe, and useful agent with fair to good evidence to support its use. In addition, amiodarone requires careful preparation and delivery to achieve safe and effective outcomes.

Oral amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery, the Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (AFIST): a randomised placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers and amiodarone reduce the frequency of atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery but the effectiveness of oral amiodarone in older patients already receiving beta-blockers is unknown. We have assessed the efficacy of oral amiodarone in preventing atrial fibrillation in patients aged 60 years or older undergoing open-heart surgery.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing open-heart surgery (n=220, average age 73 years) received amiodarone (n=120) or placebo (n=100). Patients enrolled less than 5 days before surgery received 6 g of amiodarone or placebo over 6 days beginning on preoperative day 1. Patients enrolled at least 5 days before surgery received 7 g over 10 days beginning on preoperative day 5.

FINDINGS

Patients on amiodarone had a lower frequency of any atrial fibrillation (22.5% vs 38.0%; p=0.01; absolute difference 15.5% [95% CI 3.4-27.6%]), and there were significant differences in favour of the active drug for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (4.2% vs 18.0%, p=0.001), cerebrovascular accident (1.7% vs 7.0%, p=0.04), and postoperative ventricular tachycardia (1.7% vs 7.0%, p=0.04). Beta-blocker use (87.5% amiodarone vs 91.0% placebo), nausea (26.7% vs 16.0%), 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 4.0%), symptomatic bradycardia (7.5% vs 7.0%), and hypotension (14.2% vs 10.0%) were similar.

INTERPRETATION

Oral amiodarone prophylaxis in combination with beta-blockers prevents atrial fibrillation and symptomatic fibrillation and reduces the risk of cerebrovascular accidents and ventricular tachycardia.

T Wave Alternans for Predicting Adverse Effects of Amiodarone in a Patient With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

An implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was used in a 62-year-old man with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) because of hemodynamically intolerable ventricular tachycardia (VT). Amiodarone was administered after a second episode of ICD discharge. Three weeks later, incessant VT appeared, and DC discharge failed to terminate it. Microvolt T wave alternans (TWA), measured by a spectral method, was observed in this patient with and without amiodarone administration. The onset heart rate with TWA was lower and the alternans voltage was higher with amiodarone than without it. The effects of amiodarone appeared to be related to the exacerbation of VT and an increased defibrillation threshold. TWA might be useful in predicting the proarrhythmic effects of amiodarone in similar cases.

Dramatic inhibition of amiodarone metabolism induced by grapefruit juice

AIMS

Grapefruit juice increases blood concentrations of many drugs metabolized by CYP3A. Amiodarone is metabolized by CYP3A to N-desethylamiodarone (N-DEA). The aim of this study was to determine amiodarone kinetics when administrated with and without grapefruit juice.

METHODS

Eleven healthy adult volunteers took part in a single sequence, repeated-measures design study. Each subject, who had been evaluated 6 months previously for amiodarone pharmacokinetics, was given a single oral dose of amiodarone (17 mg kg-1) with three glasses of 300 ml of grapefruit juice on the same day.

RESULTS

Grapefruit juice completely inhibited the production of N-DEA, the major metabolite of amiodarone, in all subjects and increased the area-under-the-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of amiodarone (Cmax) by 50% and 84%, respectively, as compared with the control period during which water had been administrated instead of grapefruit juice (AUC: 35.9 +/- 14.3 vs 23.9 +/- 11.2 microg ml-1 h, P < 0.005 and Cmax: 3.45 +/- 1.7 vs 1.87 +/- 0.6 microg ml-1, P < 0. 02, respectively) (means +/- s.d.). This inhibition of N-DEA production led to a decrease in the alterations caused by amiodarone on PR and QTc intervals.

CONCLUSIONS

Grapefruit juice dramatically alters the metabolism of amiodarone with complete inhibition of N-DEA production. These results are in agreement with in vitro data pointing to the involvement of CYP3 A in the metabolism of amiodarone and suggests that this interaction should be taken into account when prescribing this antiarrhythmic drug.

Intravenous antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the resuscitation from refractory ventricular arrhythmias

Prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and early defibrillation significantly improve the likelihood of successful resuscitation from cardiac arrest and are the key components in the American Heart Association's "chain of survival." Although representing current clinical practice in the United States, there is limited evidence supporting the benefit of acute administration of such antiarrhythmic medications as lidocaine, bretylium, magnesium, and procainamide to a victim of cardiac arrest. There has been only 1 published case-controlled clinical trial in which shock-refractory victims of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation were stratified into those who received lidocaine and those who did not. In this trial, no significant differences were observed between treatment groups in the return of an organized rhythm, admission to the hospital, or survival to hospital discharge. In the recently published ARREST trial, a significant improvement in admission alive to the hospital was observed in recipients of intravenous amiodarone, compared with placebo (44% vs 34%, respectively, p = 0.03). With the possible exception of intravenous amiodarone, available evidence of definitive benefit from antiarrhythmic drugs in cardiac arrest is inconclusive. Due to regulatory issues, clinical trials in cardiac arrest are extremely difficult to design and perform.

A comparison of the antifibrillatory effects of desethylamiodarone to amiodarone in a swine model

We evaluated the effect of two different doses of desethylamiodarone (DEA) and amiodarone on the ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT). We ascertained the VFT in 24 pigs randomized to intravenous DEA, amiodarone, or vehicle. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by pacing the right ventricle by using a primary drive train at a cycle length of 270 ms for eight beats of 2-ms duration each. A secondary train of 20 pulses of 4-ms duration (100 Hz) immediately followed this over a total duration of 200 ms synchronized to the primary drive train. The intensity of the secondary train stimuli current was initially 2 mA and was increased by 2-mA increments until sustained VF with hemodynamic collapse was induced. The minimal current strength needed to induce sustained VF was defined as the VFT measured in mA. DEA (10 mg/kg) increased the VFT significantly over baseline from 13.5+/-4.9 to 23.2+/-8.8 mA (p = 0.0076). Amiodarone, 10 mg/kg, increased the VFT significantly over baseline (mean +/- SD) from 14.4+/-3.6 to 23.8+/-6.1 mA (p = 0.0016). An additional dose of amiodarone (15 mg/kg) increased the VFT to 38.5+/-15.9 mA, which is significantly greater than the VFT derived from lower-dose amiodarone (p = 0.046). We showed that DEA (10 mg/kg) has a similar antifibrillatory effect as 10 mg/kg of amiodarone. We also demonstrated a dose-dependent effect on VFT for amiodarone.

The effect of amiodarone on the ventricular fibrillation threshold

We evaluated the antifibrillatory effect of two different doses of amiodarone after cardiac arrest with a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) model in 19 pigs. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by pacing the right ventricle using a primary drive train at a cycle length of 270 msec for 8 beats. The minimum current strength necessary to induce sustained ventricular fibrillation was defined as the ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) measured in mA. Three VFT determinations were made at baseline, followed by 9 minutes of continuous CPR with two determinations of VFT, and three after stabilization. The pigs were placed into one of three groups: amiodarone 2 or 5 mg/kg, or placebo. The average poststabilization VFT in each group was compared with the average baseline VFT. Pigs receiving amiodarone 2 mg/kg had significantly higher VFT after stabilization than at baseline (22.88+/-12.76 to 27.10+/-10.18 mA, p=0.048), as did those receiving 5 mg/kg (17.03+/-7.01 to 28.08+/-11.58 mA, p=0.002). The deltaVFT was significantly greater with amiodarone 5 mg/kg than with vehicle (placebo), but not with 2 mg/kg. There were no changes in VFT in any group during CPR versus baseline. When active treatments were combined, the trend was toward better survival in the amiodarone groups (13/13) compared with the placebo group (4/6, p=0.076).

Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on the defibrillation threshold in comparison to patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment

AIM OF THE STUDY

It is generally accepted that chronic therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs might increase the defibrillation threshold at implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A recently published animal study showed a minor effect of the class 1 antiarrhythmic drug lidocaine on the defibrillation threshold if biphasic shocks were used.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We therefore performed a retrospective analysis in 89 patients who received an ICD capable of monophasic (n=18) or biphasic (n=71) shocks with a transvenous lead system. In all patients the defibrillation threshold was determined according to the same step down protocol. In the 18 patients with a monophasic device the effects of chronic therapy with amiodarone (n=7) on the defibrillation threshold were evaluated in comparison to a group without antiarrhythmic treatment (n=11). In those patients receiving a biphasic device the effects of chronic therapy with amiodarone (n=29), sotalol (n=20) or no antiarrhythmic medication (n=22) on the defibrillation threshold were evaluated. The groups receiving a monophasic device did not differ in respect to age, sex, underlying cardiac disease, clinical arrhythmia (VT/VF), clinical functional status, left ventricular ejection fraction and the number of patients with additional subcutaneous electrodes. These parameters as well as the type of implanted device were not different between patient groups receiving a biphasic device. Patients on chronic amiodarone therapy receiving a monophasic device had a significantly higher defibrillation threshold (29.1 +/- 8.8 J) than patients without antiarrhythmic treatment (19.1 +/- 5.1 J, P = 0.021). The groups did not differ significantly in respect to the impedance measured at the shocking lead (P = 0.13). In three patients on chronic amiodarone an epicardiac lead system had to be implanted due to an inadequate monophasic defibrillation threshold compared to no patient without antiarrhythmic drug treatment (P = 0.043). In the patients with a biphasic device the intraoperative defibrillation threshold was not significantly different between the three study groups (P = 0.44). No patient received an epicardiac lead system. The defibrillation threshold in the amiodarone group was 15.3 +/- 7.3 J, in the sotalol group 14.4 +/- 7.2 J and in the patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment 17 +/- 6.1 J. As well, no significant difference was seen between the groups in respect of the impedance of the high voltage electrode (P = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

With the use of a biphasic device in combination with a transvenous lead system the intraoperative defibrillation threshold is not significantly different between patients on chronic amiodarone in comparison to patients without antiarrhythmic drug treatment or patients on chronic oral sotalol. This is in contrast to our findings with a monophasic device.

Impact of rifampin on serum amiodarone concentrations in a patient with congenital heart disease

A 33-year-old woman with congenital heart disease and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, managed over the long term with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator, epicardial pacing system, and amiodarone, experienced an increase in palpitations and a shock from her defibrillator. Evaluation revealed decreases in amiodarone and desethylamiodarone serum concentrations from previous levels. Rifampin had been added to her therapy 5 weeks earlier. Increases in amiodarone and desethylamiodarone concentrations were observed after an increase in the amiodarone dosage and discontinuation of rifampin. The time course suggested that the addition of rifampin led to reductions in serum concentrations of both the drug and metabolite.