Entrainment mapping and radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in right ventricular dysplasia

Transcoronary mapping with an over-the-wire multielectrode catheter in scar-related ventricular tachycardia patients

AIMS

The usefulness of coronary venous system mapping has been reported for assessing intramural and epicardial substrates in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, there has been little data on mapping from coronary arteries. We investigated the safety and utility of mapping from coronary arteries with a novel over-the-wire multielectrode catheter in scar-related VT patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Ten consecutive scar-related VT patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy who underwent mapping from a coronary artery were analysed. Six patients underwent simultaneous coronary venous mapping. High-density maps were created by combining the left ventricular endocardium and coronary vessels. Substrate maps were created during the baseline rhythm with 2438 points (IQR 2136-3490 points), including 329 (IQR 59-508 points) in coronary arteries. Abnormal bipolar electrograms were successfully recorded within coronary arteries close to the endocardial substrate in seven patients. During VT, isthmus components were recorded within the coronary vessels in three patients with no discernible isthmus components on endocardial mapping. The ablation terminated the VT from an endocardial site opposite the earliest site in the coronary arteries in five patients.

CONCLUSION

The transcoronary mapping with an over-the-wire multielectrode catheter can safely record abnormal bipolar electrograms within coronary arteries. Additional mapping data from the coronary vessels have the potential to assess three-dimensional ventricular substrates and circuit structures in scar-related VT patients.

Ablation strategies for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) has significantly evolved over the past decade. However, different ablation strategies showed inconsistency in acute and long-term outcomes.

Methods

We searched the databases of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library through October 17, 2019 for studies describing the clinical outcomes of VT ablation in ARVC. Data including VT recurrence, all-cause mortality, acute procedural efficacy and major procedural complications were extracted. A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis was further performed in comparative studies of endo-epicardial versus endocardial-only ablation.

Results

A total of 24 studies with 717 participants were enrolled. The literatures of epicardial ablation were mainly published after 2010 with total ICD implantation of 73.7%, acute efficacy of 89.8%, major complication of 5.2%, follow-up of 28.9 months, VT freedom of 75.3%, all-cause mortality of 1.1% and heart transplantation of 0.6%. Meta-analysis of 10 comparative studies revealed that compared with endocardial-only approach, epicardial ablation significantly decreased VT recurrence (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.30-0.85; P = 0.010), but somehow increased major procedural complications (OR: 4.64; 95% CI: 1.28-16.92; P= 0.02), with not evident improvement of acute efficacy (OR: 2.74; 95% CI: 0.98-7.65; P = 0.051) or all-cause mortality (OR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.09-8.31; P = 0.90).

Conclusion

Catheter ablation for VT in ARVC is feasible and effective. Epicardial ablation is associated with better long-term VT freedom, but with more major complications and unremarkable survival or acute efficacy benefit.

Catheter and Device Management of Inherited Cardiac Conditions

This state-of-the art review discusses sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification and prevention using implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and the place of catheter ablation in the major inherited cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmic syndromes. ICD therapy protects against SCD in many inherited cardiac conditions, particularly the cardiomyopathies in advanced stages, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). However, they are not usually indicated in most patients with cardiac ion channelopathies, particularly long QT syndrome, since medical management is safe and preferable for most cases. The general exception is the secondary prevention setting following a cardiac arrest, where guidelines mostly support ICD therapy. However, in the case of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), ICD therapy is less clear, with some studies indicating increased mortality when an ICD is used following a cardiac arrest, compared to optimal medical therapy alone. When ICDs are placed, they are commonly associated with morbidity, and do not reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), such that multiple ICD shocks can ensue. Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce VA burden, VA related symptoms and ICD therapy in correctly identified patients in each condition. Its role is particularly important in cases where monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is prevalent, such as Lamin-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ARVC. Evidence is growing to support the use of catheter ablation to treat premature ventricular contraction (PVC) induced VF in the setting of long and short QT syndromes, CPVT, idiopathic VF and early repolarisation syndromes. In Brugada syndrome, epicardial substrate ablation can even apparently eliminate the electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype and reduce VA burden during follow-up.

Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy in 2018-2019: ARVC/ALVC or Both?

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) is now commonly used to describe any form of non-hypertrophic, progressive cardiomyopathy characterised by fibrofatty infiltration of the ventricular myocardium. Right ventricular (RV) involvement refers to the classical arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, but left ventricular, or bi-ventricular involvement are now recognised. ACM is mostly hereditary and associated with mutations in genes encoding proteins of the intercalated disc. ACM classically manifests as ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death may be the first presentation of the disease. Heart failure is seen with advanced stages of the disease. Diagnosis can be challenging due to variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance, and is guided by established Taskforce criteria that incorporate electrical features (12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), features of ventricular arrhythmias), structural features (on imaging via echo and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), tissue characteristics (via biopsy), and familial/genetic evaluation. Electrical abnormalities may precede structural alterations, which also make diagnosis challenging, especially in differentiating ACM from other conditions such as benign right ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies such as Brugada, or the Athlete's Heart. Genetic testing is critical in identifying familial mutations and initiating cascade testing, but finds a pathogenic mutation in only ∼50% of patients. Some critical genotype-phenotype correlations do exist and may help guide risk stratification and give clues to disease progression. Therapeutic strategies include restriction from high endurance and competitive sports, ß-blockers, antiarrhythmic drugs, heart failure medications, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and combined endocardial/epicardial catheter ablation. Ablation has emerged as the treatment of choice for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias in ACM. This state-of-the-art review outlines the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of ACM in the contemporary era.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is predominantly an inherited cardiomyopathy with typical histopathological characteristics of fibro-fatty infiltration mainly involving the right ventricular (RV) inflow tract, RV outflow tract, and RV apex in the majority of patients. The above pathologic evolution frequently brings patients with ARVD/C to medical attention owing to the manifestation of syncope, sudden cardiac death (SCD), ventricular arrhythmogenesis, or heart failure. To prevent future or recurrent SCD, an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) is highly desirable in patients with ARVD/C who had experienced unexplained syncope, hemodynamically intolerable ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation, and/or aborted SCD. Notably, the management of frequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ARVD/C is challenging, and the use of antiarrhythmic drugs could be unsatisfactory or limited by the unfavorable side effects. Therefore, radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been implemented to treat the drug-refractory VT in ARVD/C for decades. However, the initial understanding of the link between fibro-fatty pathogenesis and ventricular arrhythmogenesis in ARVD/C is scarce, the efficacy and prognosis of endocardial RFCA alone were limited and disappointing. The electrophysiologists had broken through this frontier after better illustration of epicardial substrates and broadly application of epicardial approaches in ARVD/C. In recent works of literature, the application of epicardial ablation also successfully results in higher procedural success and decreases VT recurrences in patients with ARVD/C who are refractory to the endocardial approach during long-term follow-up. In this article, we review the important evolution on the delineation of arrhythmogenic substrates, ablation strategies, and ablation outcome of VT in patients with ARVD/C.

Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators to Improve Survival in Older Adult Patients with Cardiac Disease

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are well-recognized problems in the overall heart failure population, but treatment decisions can be more complex and nuanced in older patients. Sustained VA does not always lead to SCD, but identifies a higher risk population and may cause significant symptoms. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD) and catheter ablation are the mainstays for prevention of VA, but have not been shown to improve mortality. The value of implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICDs) may be influenced by patient age. This article discusses long-term treatment of VA and the use of ICDs in the elderly.

Development of Tachyarrhythmias Late After the Fontan Procedure: The Role of Ablative Therapy

Patients with a Fontan circulation are at a high risk of developing a variety of cardiac dysrhythmias after cardiac surgery. These dysrhythmias are most often supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT), but ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT) may also occur. Mechanisms underlying SVT are variable, including both ectopic activity and reentry. Over time, successive SVT may be caused by different mechanisms. The acute success rate of ablative therapy of atrial tachyarrhythmias is considerably high yet during long-term follow-up 'recurrences' frequently occur. It is most likely that these 'recurrences' are caused by a progressive atrial cardiomyopathy instead of arrhythmogeneity of prior ablative lesions.

Entrainment Mapping

Mapping during ventricular tachycardia (VT) aims to elucidate mechanism, describe myocardial propagation, and identify the origin and critical regions of VT that can be targeted for ablation, most commonly with radiofrequency ablation. Most VTs in structural heart disease are due to macro-reentry in and around scar. A combination of mapping techniques, including mapping to identify the arrhythmia substrate, activation sequence mapping, pace-mapping, and entrainment mapping, may be used to identify putative ablation targets. This review describes the principles of entrainment mapping as it pertains to catheter ablation of scar-related VT.

Long-Term Outcomes of Radio-Frequency Catheter Ablation on Ventricular Tachycardias Due to Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Single Center Experience

Aims

To summarize our experience of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for recurrent drug-refractory ventricular tachycardias (VTs) due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) in our center over the past 11 years and its related factors.

Methods and Results

We reviewed 48 adults (mean age 39.9 ± 12.9 years, range: 14 to 65) who met the present ARVC diagnostic criteria and accepted RFCA for VTs from December 2004 to April 2016. The patients received a total of 70 procedures using two ablation approaches, the endocardial approach in 52 RFCAs, and the combined epicardial and endocardial approach (the combined approach) in 18 RFCAs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the combined approach achieved better acute procedural success (p = 0.003) and better long-term outcomes (p = 0.028) than the endocardial approach. Patients who obtained acute procedural success with non-inducibility had better long-term outcomes (p < 0.001). COX regression of multivariate analysis showed that procedural success was the only factor that benefited long-term outcome, irrespective of the endocardial or the combined approach (p = 0.001). The rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients without procedural success was significantly higher than that in patients with procedural success (p = 0.005). All patients without implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation who had successful final RFCA survived.

Conclusions

The combined approach resulted in better procedural success and long-term VT-free survival compared with the endocardial approach in ARVC patients with recurrent VTs. Acute procedural success with non-inducibility was strongly related to better long-term VT-free survival and reduced SCD, irrespective of whether this was achieved by the endocardial approach or the combined approach.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) is a heart muscle disease clinically characterized by life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and pathologically by an acquired and progressive dystrophy of the ventricular myocardium with fibro-fatty replacement. Due to an estimated prevalence of 1:2000-1:5000, AC is listed among rare diseases. A familial background consistent with an autosomal-dominant trait of inheritance is present in most of AC patients; recessive variants have also been reported, either or not associated with palmoplantar keratoderma and woolly hair. AC-causing genes mostly encode major components of the cardiac desmosome and up to 50 % of AC probands harbor mutations in one of them. Mutations in non-desmosomal genes have been also described in a minority of AC patients, predisposing to the same or an overlapping disease phenotype. Compound/digenic heterozygosity was identified in up to 25 % of AC-causing desmosomal gene mutation carriers, in part explaining the phenotypic variability. Abnormal trafficking of intercellular proteins to the intercalated discs of cardiomyocytes and Wnt/beta catenin and Hippo signaling pathways have been implicated in disease pathogenesis.

AC is a major cause of sudden death in the young and in athletes. The clinical picture may include a sub-clinical phase; an overt electrical disorder; and right ventricular or biventricular pump failure. Ventricular fibrillation can occur at any stage. Genotype-phenotype correlation studies led to identify biventricular and dominant left ventricular variants, thus supporting the use of the broader term AC.

Since there is no “gold standard” to reach the diagnosis of AC, multiple categories of diagnostic information have been combined and the criteria recently updated, to improve diagnostic sensitivity while maintaining specificity. Among diagnostic tools, contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is playing a major role in detecting left dominant forms of AC, even preceding morpho-functional abnormalities. The main differential diagnoses are idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia, myocarditis, sarcoidosis, dilated cardiomyopathy, right ventricular infarction, congenital heart diseases with right ventricular overload and athlete heart. A positive genetic test in the affected AC proband allows early identification of asymptomatic carriers by cascade genetic screening of family members. Risk stratification remains a major clinical challenge and antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation and implantable cardioverter defibrillator are the currently available therapeutic tools. Sport disqualification is life-saving, since effort is a major trigger not only of electrical instability but also of disease onset and progression. We review the current knowledge of this rare cardiomyopathy, suggesting a flowchart for primary care clinicians and geneticists.

Pharmacotherapy and other therapeutic modalities for managing Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is a genetically determined rare cardiomyopathy (1 in 5000 to 1 in 2000 in the general population), which can lead to ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death (SD). The classic form of the disease has a predilection for the right ventricle (RV), but recognition of left-dominant and biventricular variants led to the broader term "Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy". The disease affects men more frequently than women and becomes clinically overt usually from the second to the fourth decade of life. Treatment consists of restriction of physical exercise, antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation and ICD implantation. These treatments have the potential to change the natural history of the disease by protecting against SD and offering a good-quality and nearly normal life-expectancy. Antiarrhythmic drugs play an important role in terms of reduction of both the number and the complexity of arrhythmias, but they do not reduce the risk of SD. The results of catheter ablation are poor because of the high rate of VT recurrence. ICD should be reserved to selected patients after an accurate risk stratification. The clinical challenge is to improve risk stratification for better identification of those patients who most benefit from the above therapies. Unfortunately, a curative therapy is not yet available.

Treatment of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: An International Task Force Consensus Statement

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias in structural heart disease

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a source of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). The advent of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) has had a positive effect on mortality, but the associated morbidity remains a significant problem. Modern treatment of VA has advanced far beyond medical therapy and includes strategies as simple as intelligent ICD programming and as complex as catheter ablation (CA). In these pages, the spectrum of management strategies will be discussed; from anti-arrhythmic drugs and ICD implantation and programming to CA and autonomic modulation. The focus of this review will be on strategies for secondary prevention of VA in patients with SHD, supported by clinical evidence for their utilization.

Current and state of the art on the electrophysiologic characteristics and catheter ablation of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) is an inherited genetic disease caused by defective desmosomal proteins, and it has typical histopathological features characterized by predominantly progressive fibro-fatty infiltration of the right ventricle. Clinical presentations of ARVD/C vary from syncope, progressive heart failure (HF), ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death (SCD). The 2010 modified Task Force criteria were established to facilitate the recognition and diagnosis of ARVD/C. An implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) remains to be the cornerstone in prevention of SCD in patients fulfilling the diagnosis of definite ARVD/C, especially among ARVD/C patients with syncope, hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation, and aborted SCD. Further risk stratification is clinically valuable in the management of patients with borderline or possible ARVD/C and mutation carriers of family members. However, given the entity of heterogeneous penetrance and non-uniform phenotypes, the standardization of clinical practice guidelines for at-risk individuals will be the next frontier to breakthrough. Antiarrhythmic drugs are prescribed frequently to patients experiencing frequent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and/or appropriate ICD shocks. Amiodarone is the recommended drug of choice. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has been demonstrated to effectively eliminate the drug-refractory VT in patients with ARVD/C. However, the efficacy and clinical prognosis of RFCA via endocardial approach alone was disappointing prior to the era of epicardial approach. In recent years, it has been proven that the integration of endocardial and epicardial ablation by targeting the critical isthmus or eliminating abnormal electrograms within the diseased substrates could yield higher acute success and lower recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during long-term follow-up. Heart transplantation is the final option for patients with extensive disease, biventricular HF with uncontrollable hemodynamic compromise, and refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias despite aggressive medical and ablation therapies.

Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Arrhythmias: Benign Or Early Stage Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia?

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) arising from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) are a common and heterogeneous entity. Idiopathic right ventricular arrhythmias (IdioVAs) are generally benign, with excellent ablation outcomes and long-term arrhythmia-free survival, and must be distinguished from other conditions associated with VAs arising from the right ventricle: the differential diagnosis with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is therefore crucial because VAs are one of the most important causes of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in young individuals even with early stage of the disease. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) is a current option for the treatment of VAs but important differences must be considered in terms of indication, purposes and procedural strategies in the treatment of the two conditions. In this review, we comprehensively discuss clinical and electrophysiological features, diagnostic and therapeutic techniques in a compared analysis of these two entities.

Ventricular tachycardia mapping and ablation in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: Lessons Learned

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D) is primarily believed to be an inherited cardiomyopathy that subsequently results in significant myocardial fibrosis. The arrhythmogenic consequences that result from the development of fibrosis are similar to other nonischemic cardiomyopathies, but the unique endocardial-epicardial disease process of ARVC/D requires a specialized approach for arrhythmia treatment in the electrophysiology laboratory. Although the association between ARVC/D and development of ventricular arrhythmias has become increasingly clear over the last 2 decades, our understanding of the arrhythmia mechanisms, underlying electrophysiologic substrate, and treatment strategies were significantly limited. Prospective studies performed in the electrophysiology laboratory allowed detailed characterization of the electrophysiologic and electroanatomic substrate underlying ventricular tachycardia in patients with ARVC/D. This has allowed clinician scientists to better characterize the arrhythmia mechanism and develop the necessary strategies to perform successful catheter ablation. Early in this experience, catheter ablation was considered a limited and largely unsuccessful treatment for patients experiencing painful and recurrent defibrillator therapy. Through our increased understanding of the disease process, catheter ablation has evolved to become an effective and preferred therapy for a majority of these patients. Our understanding of the disease and necessary approaches to provide successful treatment continues to evolve as the clinical experience grows. This article will review these important insights from the electrophysiology laboratory and how application of this knowledge has facilitated the development of a methodical approach to successfully perform ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with ARVC/D.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy: diagnosis, genetic background, and risk management

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC), also known as arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C), is a hereditary disease characterised by ventricular arrhythmias, right ventricular and/or left ventricular dysfunction, and fibrofatty replacement of cardiomyocytes. Patients with AC typically present between the second and the fourth decade of life with ventricular tachycardias. However, sudden cardiac death (SCD) may be the first manifestation, often at young age in the concealed stage of disease. AC is diagnosed by a set of clinically applicable criteria defined by an international Task Force. The current Task Force Criteria are the essential standard for a correct diagnosis in individuals suspected of AC. The genetic substrate for AC is predominantly identified in genes encoding desmosomal proteins. In a minority of patients a non-desmosomal mutation predisposes to the phenotype. Risk stratification in AC is imperfect at present. Genotype-phenotype correlation analysis may provide more insight into risk profiles of index patients and family members. In addition to symptomatic treatment, prevention of SCD is the most important therapeutic goal in AC. Therapeutic options in symptomatic patients include antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and ICD implantation. Furthermore, patients with AC and also all pathogenic mutation carriers should be advised against practising competitive and endurance sports.

Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia: indications and techniques

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be secondary to many different underlying pathophysiologies. The nature of the underlying disorder determines amenability to catheter ablation, thus, dictating the circumstances under which it should be undertaken. The differing substrates also influence the choice of techniques that are used. The most intensively studied clinical subgroup of VT is re-entrant VT in the setting of ischemic heart disease. The approach to ablation in such patients is discussed in detail. Subsequent discussion focuses on other clinically encountered varieties of VT and the ablation methods used in each individual disease state.

Prognostic value of endocardial voltage mapping in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Endocardial voltage mapping (EVM) identifies low-voltage right ventricular (RV) areas, which may represent the electroanatomic scar substrate of life-threatening tachyarrhythmias. We prospectively assessed the prognostic value of EVM in a consecutive series of patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 69 consecutive ARVC/D patients (47 males; median age 35 years [28-45]) who underwent electrophysiological study and both bipolar and unipolar EVM. The extent of confluent bipolar (<1.5 mV) and unipolar (<6.0 mV) low-voltage electrograms was estimated using the CARTO-incorporated area calculation software. Fifty-three patients (77%) showed ≥1 RV electroanatomic scars with an estimated burden of bipolar versus unipolar low-voltage areas of 24.8% (7.2-31.5) and 64.8% (39.8-95.3), respectively (P=0.009). In the remaining patients with normal bipolar EVM (n=16; 23%), the use of unipolar EVM unmasked ≥1 region of low-voltage electrogram affecting 26.2% (11.6-38.2) of RV wall. During a median follow-up of 41 (28-56) months, 19 (27.5%) patients experienced arrhythmic events, such as sudden death (n=1), appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator interventions (n=7), or sustained ventricular tachycardia (n=11). Univariate predictors of arrhythmic outcome included previous cardiac arrest or syncope (hazard ratio=3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-8.8; P=0.03) and extent of bipolar low-voltage areas (hazard ratio=1.7 per 5%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-2; P<0.001), whereas the only independent predictor was the bipolar low-voltage electrogram burden (hazard ratio=1.6 per 5%; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.9; P<0.001). Patients with normal bipolar EVM had an uneventful clinical course.

CONCLUSIONS

The extent of bipolar RV endocardial low-voltage area was a powerful predictor of arrhythmic outcome in ARVC/D, independently of history and RV dilatation/dysfunction. A normal bipolar EVM characterized a low-risk subgroup of ARVC/D patients.

Epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia

Epicardial ablation has lately become a necessary tool to approach some ventricular tachycardias in different types of cardiomyopathy. Its diffusion is now limited to a few high volume centers not because of the difficulty of the pericardial puncture but since it requires high competence not only in the VT ablation field but also in knowing and recognizing the possible complications each of which require a careful treatment.

This article will review the state of the art of epicardial ablation with special attention to the procedural aspects and to the possible selection criteria of the patients

Impact of new electrocardiographic criteria in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (AC) has originally been described as a disorder characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the myocardium, primarily of the right ventricle (RV), and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden death, and at a late stage progressive heart failure. Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia or cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) was the previous name of the disease. However, similar histopathologic changes are also found in the left ventricle (LV). AC is also considered a hereditary disease. Recent molecular genetic studies provide accumulating evidence that fibrofatty replacement is preceded by mutation-related desmosomal changes. Desmosomal dysfunction may lead to mechanical and thereafter electrical uncoupling, ultimately resulting in conduction delay. This activation delay and conduction block, provide a substrate for re-entrant mechanisms and thereby ventricular tachycardia (VT). The gold standard for AC diagnosis is demonstration of transmural fibrofatty replacement in cardiac tissue obtained by autopsy or surgery. To facilitate diagnosis in clinical practice, an international Task Force defined in 1994 a set of criteria (TFC) based on electrocardiographic, functional and morphologic features, and family history. These criteria have recently been revised. Routine 12-lead electrocardiography is one of the most important tools for AC diagnosis in all stages of the disease. Even in the absence of other markers in the early concealed stage of the disease, in line with early slow conduction and electrical uncoupling ECG analysis may contribute to early diagnosis. Activation delay and site of origin of VT are reflected in various characteristics of the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram. Since the ECG is easy to obtain, this technique is particularly useful, for both diagnosis and follow up of disease progression.

Outcomes of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Prior studies evaluating the efficacy of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) among patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) have reported varied outcomes. More recently, studies have suggested that an epicardial ablation is necessary for improved outcomes after catheter ablation of VT. The overall objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of VT in ARVD/C, with particular focus on newer ablation strategies, including epicardial catheter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study population included 87 patients with ARVD/C who underwent a total of 175 RFA procedures between 1992 and 2011 at 80 different electrophysiology centers. Recurrence of VT following RFA and effect of RFA on the burden of VT were assessed. The mean age of the cohort was 38±13 years. Over a mean follow-up of 88.3±66 months, the overall freedom from VT of the 175 procedures was 47%, 21%, and 15%, at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The cumulative freedom from VT following epicardial RFA was 64% and 45% at 1 and 5 years, respectively, which was significantly longer than endocardial RFA (P=0.021). Survival free of VT among procedures with 3D electroanatomic mapping was significantly longer compared to those without (P=0.016). Burden of VT was reduced irrespective of the ablation strategy (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although VT recurrences are common, RFA results in a significant reduction in the burden of VT in patients with ARVD/C. Further, although the use of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems and epicardial ablation strategies are associated with longer survival free of VT, recurrence rates remain considerable.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy using non-contact electroanatomical mapping: single-center experience with follow-up up to median of 30 months

Objective of study

To evaluate the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) using non-contact electro-anatomic mapping in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C).

Methods

Fifteen consecutive patients (44 ± 15 years) with ARVD/C and symptomatic VTs were studied. Eight patients had syncopal VTs. Two patients had recurrent VT while on AICD; in three patients, RFA was done prior to AICD implantation, and ten patients refused AICD. After obtaining activation maps, first, the clinical VT was targeted, and then, other VTs were sought.

Results

Twenty-five inducible VTs were mapped, and 22 of them were successfully ablated. In 13 out of 15 patients, all the clinical and inducible VTs were ablated. In two patients, non-clinical inducible VTs could not be ablated. At 25 ± 16 months (2–52 months), all patients remained asymptomatic. Antiarrhythmic medications were discontinued after 6 months. Two patients had recurrence of non-clinical VT on follow-up. There were no episodes of asymptomatic VT recorded in five patients with AICD.

Conclusion

A majority of induced VT in patients with ARVD/C can be successfully mapped and ablated using the non-contact Ensite Array Mapping system with good long-term VT-free outcome. Ablation can be a useful adjunct to AICD implantation in such patients.

Endocardial unipolar voltage mapping to identify epicardial substrate in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia

BACKGROUND

The risk and success of epicardial substrate ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) support the value of techniques identifying the epicardial substrate with endocardial mapping.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that endocardial unipolar voltage mapping in patients with right ventricular (RV) VT and preserved endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities might identify the extent of epicardial bipolar voltage abnormality.

METHODS

Using a cutoff of < 5.5 mV for normal endocardial unipolar voltage derived from 8 control patients without structural heart disease, 10 patients with known ARVC/D (group 1, retrospective) and 13 patients with RV VT (group 2, prospective) with modest or no endocardial bipolar voltage abnormalities underwent detailed endocardial and epicardial mapping.

RESULTS

The area of epicardial unipolar voltage abnormality in all 10 group 1 patients with ARVC/D (62 ± 21 cm²) and in 9 of the 13 group 2 patients (8 with criteria for ARVC/D) (53 ± 21 cm²) was on average three times more extensive than the endocardial bipolar abnormality and correlated (r = 0.63, P <.05 and r = 0.81, P <.008, respectively) with the larger area epicardial bipolar abnormality with respect to size (group 1: 82 ± 22 cm²; group 2: 68 ± 41 cm²) and location. In the remaining 4 group 2 patients and 3 additional reference patients without structural heart disease, endocardial bipolar, endocardial unipolar, and, as predicted, epicardial bipolar voltage all were normal.

CONCLUSION

Endocardial unipolar mapping with cutoff of 5.5 mV identifies more extensive areas of epicardial bipolar signal abnormalities in patients with ARVC/D and limited endocardial VT substrate.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) originally emerged as a pathologic diagnosis based on distinctive autopsy findings in cases of premature sudden death. Subsequently these characteristic pathologic features were associated with ventricular tachycardia of right ventricular origin and syncope. ARVC is a rare condition and our understanding of the disorder has been confounded by multiple small, highly selected series. Driven by both family studies and improved non-invasive imaging tools the clinical diagnosis of ARVC has broadened, in some instances extending far beyond the original limits of the syndrome. In recent years false-positive diagnoses have increased, thus stimulating investigators to move toward more rigorous clinical criteria. Despite the efforts of a Task Force to establish a baseline for subsequent empiric testing, these criteria have often inadvertently been used as a definitive diagnostic tool in the absence of prospective data. Recent genetic studies have revealed substantial etiologic heterogeneity, and ARVC is emerging as a syndrome consisting of multiple discrete disease entities, in part explaining the tremendous variation in clinical features and natural history seen in prior reports.

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy diagnostic task force criteria: impact of new task force criteria

BACKGROUND

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Dysplasia/Cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) Diagnostic Task Force Criteria (TFC) proposed in 1994 are highly specific but lack sensitivity. A new international task force modified criteria to improve diagnostic yield. A comparison of diagnosis by 1994 TFC versus newly proposed criteria in 3 patient groups was conducted.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In new TFC, scoring by major and minor criteria is maintained. Structural abnormalities are quantified and TFC highly specific for ARVD/C upgraded to major. Furthermore, new criteria are added: terminal activation duration of QRS > or = 55 ms, ventricular tachycardia with left bundle-branch block morphology and superior axis, and genetic criteria. Three groups were studied: (1) 105 patients with proven ARVD/C according to 1994 TFC, (2) 89 of their family members, and (3) 39 patients with probable ARVD/C (ie, 3 points by 1994 TFC). All were screened for pathogenic mutations in desmosomal genes. Three ARVD/C patients did not meet the new sharpened criteria on structural abnormalities and thereby did not fulfill new TFC. In 62 of 105 patients with proven ARVD/C, mutations were found: 58 in the gene encoding Plakophilin2 (PKP2), 3 in Desmoglein2, 3 in Desmocollin2, and 1 in Desmoplakin. Three patients had bigenic involvement. Ten additional relatives (11%) fulfilled new TFC: 9 (90%) were female, and all carried PKP2 mutations. No relatives lost diagnosis by application of new TFC. Of patients with probable ARVD/C, 25 (64%) fulfilled new TFC: 8 (40%) women and 14 (56%) carrying pathogenic mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first study applying new TFC to patients suspected of ARVD/C, 64% of probable ARVD/C patients and 11% of family members were additionally diagnosed. ECG criteria and pathogenic mutations especially contributed to new diagnosis. Newly proposed TFC have a major impact in increasing diagnostic yield of ARVD/C.

Ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia (ARVD) is a genetically determined myocardial disease characterized by fibrofatty replacement of the right ventricular wall. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias can be seen in the early stages of the disease, which is one of the most important causes of sudden death in young healthy individuals. Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is an option for the treatment of medically refractory ventricular arrhythmias and it has shown to successfully abolish recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VT) as well as reduce the frequency in defibrillator therapies. However, variable acute and long-term success rates have been reported. The current mapping and ablation techniques include activation and entrainment mapping during tolerated VT and substrate ablation using 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping systems. This article aims at providing a comprehensive review of RF catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in the context of ARVD.

Bidirectional ventricular tachycardia caused by a reentrant mechanism with left bundle branch block configuration on electrocardiography

Reentrant bidirectional ventricular tachycardia (VT) with left bundle branch block (LBBB) configuration was diagnosed in a 54-year-old woman who showed 2 types of VT: QRS morphologies of LBBB with inferior axis and LBBB with superior axis. The development of VT with a superior axis was preceded by VT with inferior axis and/or both configurations of VT in alternate beats exhibiting bidirectional VT. The electrophysiological study demonstrated reproducible induction of both types of VT by programmed ventricular stimulation and both types of VT were entrained. Using conventional pace mapping and electro-anatomical mapping methods, radiofrequency energy applications at the 2 exit sites of the reentry path successfully terminated both types of VT and the patient was free from VT attacks for more than 15 months.

Activation delay and VT parameters in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy: toward improvement of diagnostic ECG criteria

INTRODUCTION

Desmosomal changes, electrical uncoupling, and surviving myocardial bundles embedded in fibrofatty tissue are hallmarks of activation delay in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C). Currently, generally accepted task force criteria (TFC) are used for clinical diagnosis. We propose additional criteria based on activation delay and ventricular tachycardia (VT) to improve identification of affected individuals.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Activation delay and VT-related 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria were studied, while off drugs, in 42 patients with proven ARVD/C according to TFC, and 27 controls with idiopathic VT from the RV outflow tract. Two of three measured TFC could only be identified in a small minority of ARVD/C patients. Additional ECG criteria proposed in this study included (a) prolonged terminal activation duration, an indicator of activation delay; (b) VT with LBBB morphology and superior axis; and (c) multiple different VT morphologies. These criteria were met in 30 (71%), 28 (67%), and 37 (88%) ARVD/C patients, respectively, and in one control patient (P < 0.001). Electrophysiologic studies contributed importantly to yield different VT morphologies. Pathogenic plakophilin-2 mutations were identified in 25 (60%) of ARVD/C patients and in none of the controls. In ARVD/C patients, parameters measured were not significantly different between mutation carriers and noncarriers, except for negative T waves in V1-3, occurring more frequently in patients with mutation.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed additional criteria are specific for ARVD/C and more sensitive than the current TFC. Therefore, adding the newly proposed criteria to current TFC could improve ARVD/C diagnosis, independent of DNA analysis.

Three-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping and histologic evaluation of myocardial substrate in right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia

OBJECTIVES

We tested whether 3-dimensional electroanatomical voltage mapping (EVM) may help in the differential diagnosis between idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia (ARVC/D).

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular EVM has been demonstrated to reliably identify low-voltage regions ("electroanatomical scar"), which in patients with ARVC/D correspond to areas of fibrofatty myocardial replacement.

METHODS

The study population comprised 27 patients (15 men and 12 women, age 33.9 +/- 8 years) with RVOT tachycardia and no echocardiographic/angiographic evidence of right ventricular (RV) dilation/dysfunction, who underwent EVM and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) for characterization of ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate before catheter ablation.

RESULTS

Electroanatomical voltage mapping was normal in 20 of 27 patients (74%, group A), with electrogram voltage >1.5 mV throughout the RV. The other 7 patients (26%, group B) showed >/=1 (1.4 +/- 07) RV electroanatomical scar area(s) (bipolar voltage <0.5 mV) that correlated with fibrofatty myocardial replacement at EMB (p < 0.001). Clinical predictors of RV scar were right precordial QRS prolongation (p < 0.001) and VT inducibility (p = 0.001). Catheter ablation successfully eliminated VT in 18 of 20 patients (90%). During a follow-up of 41 +/- 8 months, 3 of 7 patients (43%) from group B received an implantable defibrillator because of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias, compared with no patients from group A (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

An early/minor form of ARVC/D may mimic idiopathic RVOT tachycardia. Electroanatomical voltage mapping is able to identify RVOT tachycardia due to concealed ARVC/D by detecting RVOT electroanatomical scars that correlate with fibrofatty myocardial replacement at EMB and predispose to sudden arrhythmic death.