Sex differences among subcutaneous defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients: a propensity-matched, multicenter, international analysis from the i-SUSI project

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous-ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicenter, international i-SUSI registry were analyzed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the iSUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analyzed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs 81.3%, p = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7-42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4%vs1.7%; log-rank p = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs 5.8%; log-rank p = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3%vs3.1%; log-rank p = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999-2.655, p = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device related-complications.

Economic Considerations of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices for The Treatment of Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem worldwide, affecting more than 64 million people [1]. The complex and severe nature of HF presents challenges in providing cost-effective care as patients often require multiple hospitalizations and treatments. This review of relevant studies with focus on the last 10 years summarizes the health and economic implications of various HF treatment options in Europe and beyond. Although the main cost drivers in HF treatment are clinical (re)admission and decompensation of HF, an assessment of the economic impacts of various other device therapy options for HF care are included in this review. This includes: cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy devices that include pacemaking (CRT-P), cardiac-resynchronisation-therapy devices that include defibrillation (CRT-D), implantable cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) and various types of pacemakers. The impact of (semi)automated (tele)monitoring as a relevant factor for increasing both the quality and economic impact of care is also taken into consideration. Quality of life adjusted life years (QALYs) are used in the overall context as a composite metric reflecting quantity and quality of life as a standardized measurement of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of different device-based HF interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

In terms of the total cost of different devices, CRT-Ds were found in several studies to be more expensive than all other devices in regards to runtime and maintenance costs including (re)implantation. In the case of CRT combined with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) versus ICD alone, CRT-D was found to be the most cost-effective treatment in research work over the past 10 years. Further comparison between CRT-D vs. CRT-P does not show an economic advantage of CRT-D as a minority of patients require shock therapy. Furthermore, a positive health economic effect and higher survival rate is seen in CRT-P full ventricular stimulation vs. right heart only stimulation. Telemedical care has been found to provide a positive health economic impact for selected patient groups-even reducing patient mortality. For heart failure both in ICD and CRT-D subgroups the given telemonitoring benefit seems to be greater in higher-risk populations with a worse HF prognosis. In patients with HF, all CIED therapies are in the range of commonly accepted cost-effectiveness. QALY and ICER calculations provide a more nuanced understanding of the economic impact these therapies create in the healthcare landscape. For severe cases of HF, CRT-D with telemedical care seems to be the better option from a health economic standpoint, as therapy is more expensive, but costs per QALY range below the commonly accepted threshold.

Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Figure-of-Eight Suture Following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation - The STYLE-AF Study

BACKGROUND

Simplified ablation technologies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) are increasingly performed worldwide. One of the most common complications following PVI are vascular access-related complications. Lately, venous closure systems (VCS) were introduced into clinical practice, aiming to reduce the time of bedrest, to increase the patients' comfort and to reduce vascular access-related complications.

AIMS

To compare the safety and efficacy of using a VCS to achieve haemostasis following single shot PVI to the actual standard of care (figure-of-eight suture and manual compression (MC)).

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized, controlled, open-label trial performed at 3 German centres. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo haemostasis either by means of VCS (VCS group) or of a figure-of-eight suture and MC (F8 group). The primary efficacy endpoint was the time to ambulation, while the primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major periprocedural adverse events until hospital discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 125 patients were randomized. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The VCS group showed a shorter time to ambulation (109.0 (82.0, 160.0) vs. 269.0 (243.8, 340.5) min; p<0.001), shorter time to haemostasis (1 (1, 2) vs. 5 (2, 10) min; p<0.001) and shorter time to discharge eligibility (270 (270, 270) vs. 340 (300, 458) min; p<0.001). No major vascular access related complication was reported in either group. A trend towards a lower incidence of minor vascular access related complications on the day of procedure was observed in the VCS group (7 (11.1%) vs. 15 (24.2%); p=0.063) as compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Following AF ablation, the use of a VCS results in a significantly shorter time to ambulation, time to haemostasis and time to discharge eligibility. No major vascular access related complications were identified. The use of MC and a figure-of-eight suture showed a trend towards a higher incidence of minor vascular access related complications.

Differences in underlying cardiac substrate among S-ICD recipients and its impact on long-term device-related outcomes: Real-world insights from the iSUSI registry

BACKGROUND

Outcome comparisons among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) recipients with nonischemic cardiomyopathies are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in device-related outcomes among S-ICD recipients with different structural substrates.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the i-SUSI (International SUbcutaneouS Implantable cardioverter defibrillator registry) project were grouped according to the underlying substrate (ischemic vs nonischemic) and subgrouped into dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Brugada syndrome (BrS), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). The main outcome of our study was to compare the rates of appropriate and inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

RESULTS

Among 1698 patients, the most common underlying substrate was ischemic (31.7%), followed by dilated cardiomyopathy (20.5%), BrS (10.8%), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (8.5%), and ARVC (4.4%). S-ICD for primary prevention was more common in the nonischemic cohort (70.9% vs 65.4%; P = .037). Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 26.5 (12.6-42.8) months, no differences were observed in appropriate shocks between ischemic and nonischemic patients (4.8%/y vs 3.9%/y; log-rank, P = .282). ARVC (9.0%/y; hazard ratio [HR] 2.492; P = .001) and BrS (1.8%/y; HR 0.396; P = .008) constituted the groups with the highest and lowest rates of appropriate shocks, respectively. Device-related complications did not differ between groups (ischemic: 6.4%/y vs nonischemic: 6.1%/y; log-rank, P = .666), nor among underlying substrates (log-rank, P = .089). Nonischemic patients experienced higher rates of inappropriate shocks than did ischemic S-ICD recipients (4.4%/y vs 3.0%/y; log-rank, P = .043), with patients with ARVC (9.9%/y; P = .001) having the highest risk, even after controlling for confounders (adjusted HR 2.243; confidence interval 1.338-4.267; P = .002).

CONCLUSION

Most S-ICD recipients were primary prevention nonischemic cardiomyopathy patients. Among those, patients with ARVC tend to receive the most frequent appropriate and inappropriate shocks and patients with BrS the least frequent appropriate shocks.

Left ventricular assist device in the presence of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator: Data from a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an increasingly used strategy for the management of patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) might be a viable alternative to conventional ICDs with a lower risk of short- and long-term of device-related complications and infections.The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the outcomes and management of S-ICD recipients who underwent LVAD implantation.

METHODS

The study population included patients with a preexisting S-ICD who underwent LVAD implantation for advanced HF despite optimal medical therapy.

RESULTS

The study population included 30 patients (25 male; median age 45 [38-52] years).The HeartMate III was the most common LVAD type. Median follow-up in the setting of concomitant use of S-ICDs and LVADs was 7 months (1-20).There were no reports of inability to interrogate S-ICD systems in this population. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) occurred in 21 (70%) patients. The primary sensing vector was the one most significantly involved in determining EMI. Twenty-seven patients (90%) remained eligible for S-ICD implantation with at least one optimal sensing vector. The remaining 3 patients (10%) were ineligible for S-ICD after attempts of reprogramming of sensing vectors. Six patients (20%) experienced inappropriate shocks (IS) due to EMI. Six patients (20%) experienced appropriate shocks. No S-ICD extraction because of need for antitachycardia pacing, ineffective therapy or infection was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of LVAD and S-ICD is feasible in most patients. However, the potential risk of EMI oversensing, IS and undersensing in the post-operative period following LVAD implantation should be considered. Careful screening for EMI should be performed in all sensing vectors after LVAD implantation.

Impact of ventricular tachycardia ablation in subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator carriers: a multicentre, international analysis from the iSUSI project

AIMS

Catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) has become an important tool to improve clinical outcomes in patients with appropriate transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks. The aim of our analysis was to test whether VT ablation (VTA) impacts long-term clinical outcomes even in subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) carriers.

METHODS AND RESULTS

International Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (iSUSI) registry patients who experienced either an ICD shock or a hospitalization for monomorphic VT were included in this analysis. Based on an eventual VTA after the index event, patients were divided into VTA+ vs. VTA- cohorts. Primary outcome of the study was the occurrence of a combination of device-related appropriate shocks, monomorphic VTs, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were addressed individually. Among n = 1661 iSUSI patients, n = 211 were included: n = 177 experiencing ICD shocks and n = 34 hospitalized for VT. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed. Both the crude and the yearly event rate of the primary outcome (5/59 and 3.8% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 41/152 and 16.4% yearly event rate in the VTA-; log-rank: P value = 0.0013) and the cardiovascular mortality (1/59 and 0.7% yearly event rate VTA+ vs. 13/152 and 4.7% yearly event rate VTA-; log-rank P = 0.043) were significantly lower in the VTA + cohort. At multivariate analysis, VTA was the only variable remaining associated with a lower incidence of the primary outcome [adjusted hazard ratio 0.262 (0.100-0.681), P = 0.006].

CONCLUSION

In a real-world registry of S-ICD carriers, the combined study endpoint of arrhythmic events and cardiovascular mortality was lower in the patient cohort undergoing VTA at long-term follow-up.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT0473876.

[Perioperative management for cardiovascular implantable electronic devices]

Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) are an important part of modern cardiology and careful perioperative planning of these procedures is necessary. All information relevant to the indication, the procedure, and the education of the patient must be available prior to surgery. This provides the basis for appropriate device selection. Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and perioperative anticoagulation management are essential to prevent infection. After surgery, postoperative monitoring, telemetric control, and device-based diagnostics are required before discharge. These processes need to be adapted to the increasing trend towards outpatient care. This review summarises perioperative management based on practical considerations.

[ESC guidelines 2023 on the management of endocarditis : What is new?]

In August 2023 the new European guidelines on the management of infective endocarditis were published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Numerous recommendations were revised and supplemented by new ones. This review article outlines the essential modifications of the current ESC guidelines focusing on the prevention including antibiotic prophylaxis, the role of the endocarditis team, the revision of the diagnostic criteria, the paradigm shift towards oral antibiotic treatment, the timing and the indications for surgical treatment as well as the relevance of infections of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

Clinical Outcomes by Sex After Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Importance

Previous studies evaluating the association of patient sex with clinical outcomes using conventional thermal ablative modalities for atrial fibrillation (AF) such as radiofrequency or cryoablation are controversial due to mixed results. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel AF ablation energy modality that has demonstrated preferential myocardial tissue ablation with a unique safety profile.

Objective

To compare sex differences in patients undergoing PFA for AF in the Multinational Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Postapproval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation (MANIFEST-PF) registry.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a retrospective cohort study of MANIFEST-PF registry data, which included consecutive patients undergoing postregulatory approval treatment with PFA to treat AF between March 2021 and May 2022 with a median follow-up of 1 year. MANIFEST-PF is a multinational, retrospectively analyzed, prospectively enrolled patient-level registry including 24 European centers. The study included all consecutive registry patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent first-ever PFA for paroxysmal or persistent AF.

Exposure

PFA was performed on patients with AF. All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation and additional ablation, which was performed at the discretion of the operator.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinically documented atrial arrhythmia for 30 seconds or longer after a 3-month blanking period. The primary safety outcome was the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and chronic (>7 days) major adverse events (MAEs).

Results

Of 1568 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.5 [11.5] years; 1015 male [64.7%]) with AF who underwent PFA, female patients, as compared with male patients, were older (mean [SD] age, 68 [10] years vs 62 [12] years; P < .001), had more paroxysmal AF (70.2% [388 of 553] vs 62.4% [633 of 1015]; P = .002) but had fewer comorbidities such as coronary disease (9% [38 of 553] vs 15.9% [129 of 1015]; P < .001), heart failure (10.5% [58 of 553] vs 16.6% [168 of 1015]; P = .001), and sleep apnea (4.7% [18 of 553] vs 11.7% [84 of 1015]; P < .001). Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 99.8% of female (552 of 553) and 98.9% of male (1004 of 1015; P = .90) patients. Additional ablation was performed in 22.4% of female (124 of 553) and 23.1% of male (235 of 1015; P = .79) patients. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was similar in male and female patients (79.0%; 95% CI, 76.3%-81.5% vs 76.3%; 95% CI, 72.5%-79.8%; P = .28). There was also no significant difference in acute major AEs between groups (male, 1.5% [16 of 1015] vs female, 2.5% [14 of 553]; P = .19).

Conclusion and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that after PFA for AF, there were no significant sex differences in clinical effectiveness or safety events.

Data standards for atrial fibrillation/flutter and catheter ablation: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart)

AIMS

Standardized data definitions are essential for monitoring and assessment of care and outcomes in observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart) project of the European Society of Cardiology aimed to develop contemporary data standards for atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) and catheter ablation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used the EuroHeart methodology for the development of data standards and formed a Working Group comprising 23 experts in AF/AFL and catheter ablation registries, as well as representatives from the European Heart Rhythm Association and EuroHeart. We conducted a systematic literature review of AF/AFL and catheter ablation registries and data standard documents to generate candidate variables. We used a modified Delphi method to reach a consensus on a final variable set. For each variable, the Working Group developed permissible values and definitions, and agreed as to whether the variable was mandatory (Level 1) or additional (Level 2). In total, 70 Level 1 and 92 Level 2 variables were selected and reviewed by a wider Reference Group of 42 experts from 24 countries. The Level 1 variables were implemented into the EuroHeart IT platform as the basis for continuous registration of individual patient data.

CONCLUSION

By means of a structured process and working with international stakeholders, harmonized data standards for AF/AFL and catheter ablation for AF/AFL were developed. In the context of the EuroHeart project, this will facilitate country-level quality of care improvement, international observational research, registry-based RCTs, and post-marketing surveillance of devices and pharmacotherapies.

Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review

Interventional electrophysiology offers a great variety of treatment options to patients suffering from symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia has globally evolved a cornerstone in modern arrhythmia management. Complex interventional electrophysiological procedures engaging multiple ablation tools have been developed over the past decades. Fluoroscopy enabled interventional electrophysiologist throughout the years to gain profound knowledge on intracardiac anatomy and catheter movement inside the cardiac cavities and hence develop specific ablation approaches. However, the application of X-ray technologies imposes serious health risks to patients and operators. To reduce the use of fluoroscopy during interventional electrophysiological procedures to the possibly lowest degree and to establish an optimal protection of patients and operators in cases of fluoroscopy is the main goal of modern radiation management. The present manuscript gives an overview of possible strategies of fluoroscopy reduction and specific radiation protection strategies.

Safety and Effectiveness of Pulsed Field Ablation to Treat Atrial Fibrillation: One-Year Outcomes From the MANIFEST-PF Registry

BACKGROUND

Pulsed field ablation is a novel nonthermal cardiac ablation modality using ultra-rapid electrical pulses to cause cell death by a mechanism of irreversible electroporation. Unlike the traditional ablation energy sources, pulsed field ablation has demonstrated significant preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation, and thus avoids certain thermally mediated complications. However, its safety and effectiveness remain unknown in usual clinical care.

METHODS

MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-Approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) is a retrospective, multinational, patient-level registry wherein patients at each center were prospectively included in their respective center registries. The registry included all patients undergoing postapproval treatment with a multielectrode 5-spline pulsed field ablation catheter to treat atrial fibrillation (AF) between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2022. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from clinical documented atrial arrhythmia (AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia) of ≥30 seconds on the basis of electrocardiographic data after a 3-month blanking period (on or off antiarrhythmic drugs). Safety outcomes included the composite of acute (<7 days postprocedure) and latent (>7 days) major adverse events.

RESULTS

At 24 European centers (77 operators) pulsed field ablation was performed in 1568 patients with AF: age 64.5±11.5 years, female 35%, paroxysmal/persistent AF 65%/32%, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 2.2±1.6, median left ventricular ejection fraction 60%, and left atrial diameter 42 mm. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 99.2% of patients. After a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 367 (289-421) days, the 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 78.1% (95% CI, 76.0%-80.0%); clinical effectiveness was more common in patients with paroxysmal AF versus persistent AF (81.6% versus 71.5%; P=0.001). Acute major adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large observational registry of the postapproval clinical use of pulsed field technology to treat AF, catheter ablation using pulsed field energy was clinically effective in 78% of patients with AF.

[Focal atrial tachycardias: diagnostics and therapy]

In this article, typical characteristics of focal atrial tachycardias are described and a systematic approach regarding diagnostics and treatment options in the field of invasive cardiac electrophysiology (EP) is presented. Subjects of this article include the definition of focal atrial tachycardias, knowledge about localizing the origin of such, and guidance on how to approach an invasive EP study (e.g., administration of medication during the EP study to provoke tachycardias). Further, descriptions will be found on how to localize the origin of focal atrial tachycardias with the help of the 12-lead ECG and invasive three-dimensional mapping to successfully treat focal atrial tachycardias with catheter ablation.

The need for a subsequent transvenous system in patients implanted with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

The absence of pacing capabilities may reduce the appeal of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) devices for patients at risk for conduction disorders or with antitachycardia pacing (ATP)/cardiac resynchronization (CRT) requirements. Reports of rates of S-ICD to transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (TV-ICD) system switch in real-world scenarios are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the need for a subsequent transvenous (TV) device in patients implanted with an S-ICD and its predictors.

METHODS

All patients implanted with an S-ICD were enrolled from the multicenter, real-world iSUSI (International SUbcutaneouS Implantable cardioverter defibrillator) Registry. The need for a TV device and its clinical reason, and appropriate and inappropriate device therapies were assessed. Logistic regression with Firth penalization was used to assess the association between baseline and procedural characteristics and the overall need for a subsequent TV device.

RESULTS

A total of 1509 patients were enrolled (age 50.8 ± 15.8 years; 76.9% male; 32.0% ischemic; left ventricular ejection fraction 38% [30%-60%]). Over 26.5 [13.4-42.9] months, 155 (10.3%) and 144 (9.3%) patients experienced appropriate and inappropriate device therapies, respectively. Forty-one patients (2.7%) required a TV device (13 bradycardia; 10 need for CRT; 10 inappropriate shocks). Body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were associated with need for a TV device (odds ratio [OR] 2.57 [1.37-4.81], P = .003; and OR 2.67 [1.29-5.54], P = .008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

A low rate (2.7%) of conversion from S-ICD to a TV device was observed at follow-up, with need for antibradycardia pacing, ATP, or CRT being the main reasons. BMI >30 kg/m2 and CKD predicted all-cause need for a TV device.

Multi-national survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety on the post-approval clinical use of pulsed field ablation (MANIFEST-PF)

AIMS

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation modality that has demonstrated preferential tissue ablation, including no oesophageal damage, in first-in-human clinical trials. In the MANIFEST-PF survey, we investigated the 'real world' performance of the only approved PFA catheter, including acute effectiveness and safety-in particular, rare oesophageal effects and other unforeseen PFA-related complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective survey included all 24 clinical centres using the pentaspline PFA catheter after regulatory approval. Institution-level data were obtained on patient characteristics, procedure parameters, acute efficacy, and adverse events. With an average of 73 patients treated per centre (range 7-291), full cohort included 1758 patients: mean age 61.6 years (range 19-92), female 34%, first-time ablation 94%, paroxysmal/persistent AF 58/35%. Most procedures employed deep sedation without intubation (82.1%), and 15.1% were discharged same day. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was successful in 99.9% (range 98.9-100%). Procedure time was 65 min (38-215). There were no oesophageal complications or phrenic nerve injuries persisting past hospital discharge. Major complications (1.6%) were pericardial tamponade (0.97%) and stroke (0.4%); one stroke resulted in death (0.06%). Minor complications (3.9%) were primarily vascular (3.3%), but also included transient phrenic nerve paresis (0.46%), and TIA (0.11%). Rare complications included coronary artery spasm, haemoptysis, and dry cough persistent for 6 weeks (0.06% each).

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of unselected patients, PFA was efficacious for PVI, and expressed a safety profile consistent with preferential tissue ablation. However, the frequency of 'generic' catheter complications (tamponade, stroke) underscores the need for improvement.

Impact of very wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on esophageal temperature changes during pulsed field ablation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Esophageal thermal injury (ETI) is a serious drawback of available energy sources for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, especially on the posterior left atrial (LA) wall. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel non-thermal energy source with promising safety advantages over existing methods due to its unique myocardial tissue specificity sparing the esophagus.

Objective

To evaluate esophageal temperature changes during very wide antral pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the PFA system.

Methods

Thirteen consecutive AF patients (62% with paroxysmal AF; age: 61 years; 70% male) underwent first-time PFA under deep sedation. Eight pulse trains (2kV/2.5 sec, bipolar, biphasic, 4x basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each pulmonary vein (PV). Extra pulse trains in the flower configuration were added for very wide antral circumferential ablation (vWACA). Continuous intraluminal esophageal temperature (TESO) was monitored with an S-shaped esophageal temperature probe.

Results

A median of 32 (IQR 32;32) and 8 (IQR 8;9) pulse trains for PVI and vWACA with a procedural time and catheter dwell time of 67 min (IQR 61-69) and 17 min (IQR 16-18) were applied. PFA with vWACA resulted in consecutive posterior LA wall isolation in 11/13 patients. Fluoroscopically, the esophagus coursed near the right PVs in 2/13, left PVs in 8/13 and mid-posterior wall position in 3/13 patients. Maximum TESO increase from baseline was 0.8 ±0.9 °C. However, no clinically relevant TESO changes occurred (Table 1). On short-term, all patients remained asymptomatic for sore throat, cough, or other symptoms potentially related to ETI. No esophago-duodenoscopy was necessary.

Conclusion

PFA of the PVs and lesion extension to the posterior LA wall demonstrated clinically non-significant TESO changes and has the potential to eliminate the risk of a thermal damage to the esophagus.

Very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus block : the Fast-and-Furious CTI study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Catheter ablation for typical right atrial flutter (AFL) provides an effective treatment associated with encouraging clinical outcome. The novel micro-electrode ablation catheter allows very high-power short-duration (vHP-SD, 90 W/4 sec) ablation and potentially offers the ability to perform a safe, effective and faster cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation.

Aims

We evaluated feasibility and efficacy of a vHP-SD (90 W/4 sec) temperature-controlled radiofrequency (RF) CTI ablation for AFL using a novel contact force (CF) sensing ablation catheter with micro-electrodes.

Methods

Fifteen consecutive patients (median age 75 years (interquartile range, IQR: 67, 79), 67 % male) with documented typical AFL were prospectively enrolled and underwent vHP-SD based CTI ablation (90 W/4 sec). Durability of CTI block was proven by pacing maneuvers from both sides of the ablation line.

Results

Complete CTI block using vHP-SD ablation was achieved in all patients (Figure 1). At median 23 (IQR 20; 39) RF applications over a median RF ablation time of 92 (IQR 78, 154) seconds were applied. It was not necessary to switch to the standard temperature-controlled mode to achieve durable CTI block. No periprocedural complications, no charring and no steam pops were observed.

Conclusions

Very high-power short-duration (90 W/4 sec) CTI ablation for the treatment of typical AFL is feasible and efficient. Effective CTI block can be achieved in about 1.5 minutes of RF time.

Comparison of ostial versus very wide antral circumferential pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the gold standard for first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. Wide antral circumferential ablation (WACA) in comparison to ostial PVI has been attributed to an improved rhythm outcome after AF ablation. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel energy source with promising safety and efficacy advantages over existing ablation methods due to its unique myocardial tissue specificity. Feasibility of PFA for very WACA has not been investigated so far.

Objective

To evaluate procedural characteristics and lesion formation during wide antral circumferential PVI in comparison to ostial PVI using a PFA system.

Methods

Thirty-seven consecutive AF patients underwent first-time PFA under deep sedation. Patients eighter received ostial (ostial group; N = 15: 66 % paroxysmal AF; age: 69 years; 66 % male) or very wide antral (vWACA group; N = 22: 59 % paroxysmal AF; age: 62 years; 73 % male) PFA. Pre and post ablation LA voltage maps were acquired using a 20-pole spiral catheter together with a 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system (voltage cutoff ≤0.5 mV). On post ablation maps, lesion size by encircling the ablated area was measured. In all patients, 8 pulse trains (2kV/2.5 sec, bipolar, biphasic, 4x basket/flower configuration each) were delivered to each pulmonary vein (PV). In the vWACA-group, extra pulse trains in flower configuration were added to each PV in a wide antral position continuous intraluminal esophageal temperatures (TESO) were monitored with an S-shaped esophageal temperature probe.

Results

A median of 8 [IQR 8;8] and 10 [IQR 10;11] pulse trains per PV for ostial and vWACA PVI were applied. vWACA PFA resulted in significant larger lesion formation (47.3 cm2 [IQR 39.1; 52.0]) in comparison to ostial PFA (35.5 cm2 [IQR 30.3; 38.1], p=0.013) with consecutive posterior LA wall isolation in 19/22 (86 %) patients (Figure 1). In the vWACA group, median TESO increased by 0.7 °C (TESOmax 36.5 °C [IQR 36.0;36.9]). However, the vWACA approach was not associated with a significant increase in procedure time, sedation dosage or exposure to radiation.

Conclusion

Very wide antral circumferential PFA of the PVs is feasible and was associated with significant larger lesion formation in comparison to conventional ostial PFA. Concomitant posterior LA wall isolation occurred in the majority of patient and did not result in a clinically significant increase of intraluminal esophageal temperatures, procedure time, sedation and radiation dosage.

Acute procedural characteristics, efficacy, and safety of a novel cryoballoon for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results from the POLAR-ICE study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Boston Scientific

Background/Introduction

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a cryoballoon is well-established for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Initial experience with a novel cryoballoon (CB) with a stable low balloon pressure (POLARx, Boston Scientific) has demonstrated acute procedural safety and efficacy in de novo PVI procedures in patients with paroxysmal AF. However, to date, there is limited multicenter data on real world acute outcomes and procedural characteristics with this novel cryoballoon.

Purpose

The purpose of POLAR ICE was to provide real-world data on the acute and chronic outcomes of cryoballoon ablation with POLARx for the treatment of PAF. Here we report on the initial acute outcomes up to 3 months including procedural efficacy, safety, and biophysical parameters.

Methods

POLAR ICE, a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter (international) registry (NCT04250714), enrolled 400 patients across 19 centers, between Aug 2020 and May 2021. This study included any patients indicated for treatment of PAF with the POLARx cryoablation system. The study protocol did not mandate any specific cryodosing regimen, this was left to the operator. Procedural characteristics, such as time to isolation (TTI), cryoablations per pulmonary vein, balloon nadir temperature, and occlusion grade were recorded. PVI was confirmed with entrance block testing.

Results

Complete PVI was achieved in 96.1% of PVs (1437/1496). Procedure and fluoroscopy times were 69.0±25.2 min and 15.8±10.0 min, respectively. Left atrial dwell time was 47.3±18.8 min. The cryoablation characteristics by vein are shown in the Table 1. An average of 4.9±1.8 ablations were performed per patient (1.3±0.7 per vein). Grade 3 or 4 occlusion was achieved in 98.1% of PVs reported. Electrical isolation was achieved with an average TTI of 50±33.8s and in 81.4% of PVs isolation required only a single cryoablation. Nadir temperatures across all pulmonary veins averaged -56.3± 6.5C. Time to -40C was 32.9±11s and Time to Thaw (0C) was 19.5±6.7s across all veins. PVI was performed on atypical anatomies (12 LCPV, 7 RMPV, & 3 RCPV) in 19 pts. Serious adverse events included phrenic nerve palsy (0.5%), tamponade (0.5%), AV block (0.3%), stroke (0.3%), and transient ischemic attack (0.3%).

Conclusions

Real world usage data on the novel CB suggests that this device is safe and effective, with a PV isolation success rate of 96.2% and 81.4% of PVs isolated with a single cryoablation. These data are in keeping with reports on other cryoballon systems and have markedly shorter procedure times than have been previously reported on this cryoballon.

S-ICD in heart failure patients: real-world data from a multicenter, european analysis

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Data on patients with heart failure (HF) and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) are very scarce and limited to a single prospective analysis from the UNTOUCHED trial.

Purpose

Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of the S-ICD in HF patients, comparing them with a no-HF population, in a real-world analysis from the largest European retrospective S-ICD registry (ELISIR registry).

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing S-ICD implantation at 20 European institutions enrolled in the ELISIR registry were used for the current analysis. According to European Guidelines, the registry population was classified into two groups: the HF cohort (further classified as HF with reduced and mid-range ejection fraction – HFrEF and HFmrEF) vs the no-HF group. The primary outcome of the study was the inappropriate shock (IS) rate across the two cohorts. As secondary outcomes, appropriate shocks, cardiovascular mortality and device-related complications during follow-up were assessed.

Results

A total of 1409 patients from the ELISIR registry were included in this analysis; HF patients represented 57.3% of the entire cohort (n=701, 86.9% HFrEF; n=106,13.1% HFmrEF). As expected, the HF cohort showed significantly higher rates of cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities when compared to the no-HF cohort. Over a median follow-up of approximately 2 years, a total of 133 inappropriate shocks were observed in the entire cohort, without significant differences among the two groups (9.2% vs 9.8%, p=0.689). 133 complex ventricular arrhythmias were adequately recognized and treated in the overall cohort, showing similar rates of appropriate shocks (9.2% vs 9.8%, p=0.689). Inappropriate and effective shocks-free survival has been represented in Figure 1, showing Kaplan-Meier estimates comparing HF vs no-HF patients, also stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The impact of baseline and procedural characteristics on the primary outcome was tested through univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis in HF patients; at multivariate analysis, only age (HR=0.974 [0.955–0.992], p=0.005), LVEF (HR=0.954 [0.926-0.984], p=0.003), ARVC (HR=3.364 [1.206-9.384], p=0.020) and smart pass algorithm "on" (HR=0.321 [0.184-0.560], p&lt;0.001) remained associated with inappropriate shocks (Figure 2). A low number of patients (n=76) experienced device-related complications, more frequently in the HF cohort (6.2% vs 3.8%, p=0.031) with no significant differences regarding any specific outcome of interest: lead infection (1.1% vs 0.7%, p=0.381), pocket infection (1.9% vs 0.8%, p=0.107), pocket hematoma (3.2% vs 2.8%, p=0.668).

Conclusion

The rate of inappropriate shocks seems to be comparable in both HF and non-HF patients implanted with S-ICD. However, the rate of device-related complications was slightly more frequent in HF patients.

Age-related differences and associated outcomes of S-ICD: insights from a large, european, multicenter, real-world registry

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Young patients often represent the most suitable candidates for an entirely subcutaenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, since they have to face a lifetime of device therapy and they rarely have a pre-existing or concurrent pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication. Moreover, S-ICD offers lower rate and a safer management of lead and major procedure-related complications. To date, a few limited case series and experiences with S-ICD in teenagers and young adults have shown that the S-ICD system is safe and feasible in this population, with a rate of inappropriate shocks (IS) comparable to transvenous (TV) ICD, but focused analysis on a large scale are currently lacking in this setting.

Purpose

The aim of the current study was to compare the age-related differences observed in patient selection, baseline characteristics, and device long-term associated outcomes in a large real world cohort of S-ICD recipients. The primary outcome of the study was defined as the comparisons of the IS rate observed during the entirety of follow up in the teenagers/young adult vs the adult populations. Rate of complications, freedom from sustained ventricular arrhythmic events, overall and cardiovascular mortality were also assessed in the two cohorts and assessed as secondary outcomes.

Methods

All S-ICD recipients in the ELISIR project were enrolled in the current study. Patients were classified into teenagers + young adults (≤ 30 years old) vs adults (&gt; 30 years old), depending from patient age at device implantation (Figure 1). Rates of device-related complications and IS were compared between the cohorts.

Results

A total of 1349 patients were extracted from the ELISIR project. Teenagers and young adults represented 12.4% of the registry (n=56 teenagers; n=112 young adults). Patients were followed-up for a median of 23.1 [12.6–37.9] months. Overall, 117 (8.7%) patients experienced inappropriate S-ICD shocks and 100 (7.4%) device related complications were observed, with no age-related differences. IS resulted more frequent in the teenager and young adult cohort (14.3% vs 7.9%; p=0.006). Figure 2 reports Kaplan Meier curves for the occurrence of IS. At univariate analysis, young age was associated with IS, but after correcting for differences in arrhythmic substrate, this association resulted non-significant (aHR: 1.428 [0.883–2.331]; p=0.146). The use of SMART pass algorithm was instead associated to a strong reduction in IS (aHR 0.367 [0.245–0.548]; p&lt;0.001).

Conclusion

The use of S-ICD in teenagers/young adults resulted safe and effective. Indeed, the rate of complications between teenagers/young adults and adults was not significantly different. Although a higher rate of IS was observed in the teenagers/young adults, when accounting for differences in baseline substrate and comorbidities, young age did not result associated with an increased risk of IS.

C9 SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BMI: REAL–WORLD DATA FROM A EUROPEAN MULTICENTER ANALYSIS

Background

One of the current limitations of the S–ICD is the relatively large size of the generator compared to the TV (transvenous) ICD. There is little evidence whether the size of the current S–ICD generator is associated with an elevated risk of device–related complications in patients with a low body mass index (BMI).

Purpose

Aim of this study was to compare the device–related complications and long–term outcomes in a large real world cohort of S–ICD recipients in patients with a BMI &lt;18 kg/m2 compared to patients with a BMI &gt;18 kg/m2.

Methods

All consecutive patients meeting current guideline indications for ICD implantation and undergoing implantation of a S–ICD device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) at 21 European institutions enrolled in the extended ELISIR registry were used for the current analysis. Patients were classified into two cohorts, depending on the BMI at the time of device implantations: BMI &lt; 18 kg/m2 versus &gt; 18 kg/m2.

Results

Out of a total of 1497 pts, 58 pts (3.9%) had a BMI &lt; 18 kg/m2. Patients with BMI &lt;18 kg/m2 were younger (44.6±2.4 vs 50.8±0.4; p = 0.004) and more frequently female (58.6% vs 22.3%, p &lt; 0.001). No differences in any of the other baseline characteristic were observed. Implantation techniques resulted comparable between the groups (rates of 2–incision technique: 87.8% vs 91.9%; p = 0.256; inter–muscular placement: 89.7% vs 83.3%; p = 0.198). Of note, the mean PRAETORIAN score at implantation of patients with BMI &lt;18 kg/m2 was significantly lower (33.8±9.1 vs 54.1±47.3; p = 0.035), although the vast majority of patients in both cohorts qualified as at low risk of conversion failure (100% vs 91.4%; p = 0.436). Over a median follow up time of 22.4 [11.6–36.8] months, both overall device–related complications (5.2% vs 7.4%) and rates of inappropriate shocks (12.0% vs 8.8%) resulted comparable between the two groups (p = 0.517 and p = 0.385, respectively). Figure 1 reports Kaplan–Meier curves showing the combined incidence of device–related complications and inappropriate shocks in the two groups (log–rank p = 0.576).

Conclusion

No differences in device–related complications and long–term outcomes after S–ICD implantation were observed in patients with BMI &lt;18 kg/m2 compared to the remaining recipients in a large multicentered real–world analysis.

P21 AGE–RELATED DIFFERENCES AND ASSOCIATED OUTCOMES OF S–ICD: INSIGHTS FROM A LARGE, EUROPEAN, MULTICENTER REGISTRY

Background

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S–ICD) has become an alternative to transvenous ICDs (TV–ICD) in patients who do not need pacing. To date, there is little evidence directly comparing the rates of inappropriate shocks (IAS) in young vs old S–ICD recipients.

Purpose

Aim of our study was to assess differences in device–related complications and inappropriate shocks (IS) between teenagers/young adults and adult recipients of a subcutabeous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S–ICD) device.

Methods

Two propensity–matched cohorts of teenagers + young adults (≤ 30–year–old) and adults (&gt; 30–year–old) were retrieved from the ELISIR registry. The primary outcome was the comparison of the inappropriate shock (IAS) rate; complications, freedom from sustained ventricular arrhythmic events, overall and cardiovascular mortality were deemed secondary outcomes.

Results

A total of 1491 patients were extracted from the ELISIR project. Teenagers + young adults represented 11.0% of the entire cohort. Two propensity–matched groups of 161 patients each were used for the analysis (Figure 1); median follow–up was 23.1 [13.2–40.5] months. 15.2% patients experienced inappropriate S–ICD shocks and 9.3% device related complications were observed with no age–related differences in IAS (16.1% vs 14.3%; p = 0.642) and complication rates (9.9% vs 8.7%; p = 0.701); Figure 2 shows a survival analysis from inappropriate shocks in the teen–ager/young adult cohort (red) and in the adult cohort (blue). At univariate analysis, young age was not associated with increased rates of IAS (HR 1.204 [0.675–2.148]: p = 0.529). At multivariate analysis (Figure 3), the use of SMART pass algorithm was associated to a strong reduction in IAS (aHR 0.292 [0.161–0.525]; p &lt; 0.001), while ARVC was associated with higher rates of IAS (aHR 2.380 [1.205–4.697]; p = 0.012).

Conclusion

In a large multicentered European registry of patients with S–ICD, 11.0% of all recipients were teenagers or young adults. The use of S–ICD in teenagers/young adults resulted safe and effective, and the rates of complications and IAS between teenagers/young adults and adults were not significantly different. The only predictor of increased IAS was a diagnosis of ARVC.

P25 SUBCUTANEOUS–ICD IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE: RESULTS FROM A MULTICENTER, EUROPEAN ANALYSIS

Background

Data on patients with heart failure (HF) with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S–ICD) are scarce.

Objective

Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of the S–ICD in HF patients in a real–world analysis from the largest European retrospective S–ICD registry (ELISIR).

Methods

All consecutive patients undergoing S–ICD implantation at several European institutions were used for the current analysis. The population was classified into two groups: the HF (classified as HF with reduced and mid–range ejection fraction – HFrEF and HFmrEF) vs the no–HF cohort. The primary outcome of the study was the inappropriate shock (IS) rate across the two cohorts. As secondary outcomes, appropriate shocks, cardiovascular mortality and device–related complications during follow–up were assessed

Results

A total of 1409 patients from the ELISIR registry were included; HF patients represented 57.3% of the entire cohort (n = 701, 86.9% HFrEF; n = 106,13.1% HFmrEF). Over a median follow–up of approximately 2 years, a total of 133 inappropriate shocks were observed in the entire cohort, without significant differences among the two groups (9.2% vs 9.8%, p = 0.689). 133 complex ventricular arrhythmias were adequately recognized and treated, with similar rates of appropriate shocks (9.2% vs 9.8%, p = 0.689). Inappropriate and effective shocks–free survival has been represented in Figure 1 (Kaplan–Meier estimates). At multivariate analysis (Figure 2), age (HR = 0.974 [0.955–0.992], p = 0.005), LVEF (HR = 0.954 [0.926–0.984], p = 0.003), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy – ARVC (HR = 3.364 [1.206–9.384], p = 0.020) and smart pass + (HR = 0.321 [0.184–0.560], p &lt; 0.001) remained associated with inappropriate shocks. Moreover, a low number of patients (n = 76) experienced device–related complications, more frequently in the HF cohort (6.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.031) with no significant differences regarding any specific outcome of interest: lead infection (1.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.381), pocket infection (1.9% vs 0.8%, p = 0.107), pocket hematoma (3.2% vs 2.8%, p = 0.668).

Conclusion

The use of S–ICD in HF patients did not result in a higher rate of inappropriate shocks when compared to no–HF patients, even when stratifying for LVEF. Only age, LVEF, ARVC e Smart Pass algorithm were predictors of the primary outcome at multivariate analysis. Despite a lower overall rate of complications in the entire cohort, HF patients experienced device–related complications more frequently.

[Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy]

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an effective treatment option of scar-related ventricular tachycardias (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Several studies proved the benefit of VT catheter ablation, which has become routine in most electrophysiology laboratories. This article provides practical instructions to perform a VT catheter ablation. The authors describe conventional and substrate-based mapping and ablation strategies as well as concepts for image integration. This article continues a series of publications created for education in advanced electrophysiology.

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and defibrillation testing: A propensity-matched pilot study

BACKGROUND

To date, only a few comparisons between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) patients undergoing and those not undergoing defibrillation testing (DT) at implantation (DT+ vs DT-) have been reported.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of 2 propensity-matched cohorts of DT+ and DT- patients.

METHODS

Among consecutive S-ICD patients implanted across 17 centers from January 2015 to October 2020, DT- patients were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics with DT+ patients. The primary outcome was a composite of ineffective shocks and cardiovascular mortality. Appropriate and inappropriate shock rates were deemed secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 1290 patients, a total of 566 propensity-matched patients (283 DT+; 283 DT-) served as study population. Over median follow-up of 25.3 months, no significant differences in primary outcome event rates were found (10 DT+ vs 14 DT-; P = .404) as well as for ineffective shocks (5 DT- vs 3 DT+; P = .725). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, DT performance was associated with a reduction of neither the primary combined outcome nor ineffective shocks at follow-up. A high PRAETORIAN score was positively associated with both the primary outcome (hazard ratio 3.976; confidence interval 1.339-11.802; P = .013) and ineffective shocks alone at follow-up (hazard ratio 19.030; confidence interval 4.752-76.203; P = .003).

CONCLUSION

In 2 cohorts of strictly propensity-matched patients, DT performance was not associated with significant differences in cardiovascular mortality and ineffective shocks. The PRAETORIAN score is capable of correctly identifying a large percentage of patients at risk for ineffective shock conversion in both cohorts.

Supervised Obesity Reduction Trial for AF Ablation Patients: Results from the SORT-AF trial

Aims

Weight management seems to be beneficial for obese atrial fibrillation (AF) patients; however, randomized data are sparse. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the influence of weight reduction on AF ablation outcomes.

Methods and results

SORT-AF is an investigator-sponsored, prospective, randomized, multicentre, and clinical trial. Patients with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal or persistent) and body mass index (BMI) 30–40 kg/m² underwent AF ablation and were randomized to either weight-reduction (group 1) or usual care (group 2), after sleep–apnoea–screening and loop recorder (ILR) implantation. The primary endpoint was defined as AF burden between 3 and 12 months after AF ablation. Overall, 133 patients (60 ± 10 years, 57% persistent AF) were randomized to group 1 (n = 67) and group 2 (n = 66), respectively. Complications after AF-ablation were rare (one stroke and no tamponade). The intervention led to a significant reduction of BMI (34.9 ± 2.6–33.4 ± 3.6) in group 1 compared to a stable BMI in group 2 (P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation burden after ablation decreased significantly (P < 0.001), with no significant difference regarding the primary endpoint between the groups (P = 0.815, odds ratio: 1.143, confidence interval: 0.369–3.613). Further analyses showed a significant correlation between BMI and AF recurrence for patients with persistent AF compared with paroxysmal AF patients (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

The SORT-AF study shows that AF ablation is safe and successful in obese patients using continuous monitoring via ILR. Although the primary endpoint of AF burden after ablation did not differ between the two groups, the effects of weight loss and improvement of exercise activity were beneficial for obese patients with persistent AF demonstrating the relevance of life-style management as an important adjunct to AF ablation in this setting.

Trial registration number

NCT02064114.

Impact of transcatheter mitral valve repair on ventricular arrhythmias

AIMS

Patients with heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) have a poor prognosis and carry an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias. The present study evaluates the impact of transcatheter mitral valve repair using the MitraClip on the potential reduction of ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing MitraClip implantation were prospectively enrolled into the present study and received 24 h Holter ECG assessment prior to and 6 months after the procedure. In addition, left ventricular dimensions and function were assessed at baseline and follow-up. A total of 50 patients with mainly functional MR (82%) were included. Non-sustained or sustained ventricular tachycardia (nsVT and/or sVT) occurred in 32% of patients and was reduced to 14% at follow-up (P = 0.01). Also, premature ventricular complex (PVC) burden ≥5% decreased from 16% to 4% (P = 0.04). Patients with persistent (n = 6) or new (n = 1) nsVT and/or sVT at follow-up showed a significant decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction from 38% (interquartile range 26-45%) to 33% (interquartile range 22-44%; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, transcatheter mitral valve repair using MitraClip was associated with a reduced prevalence of ventricular arrhythmias. The subset of patients with persistent or new ventricular arrhythmias after MitraClip implantation showed progression of left ventricular dysfunction.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy/Dysplasia: A Sequential Approach

Background

It has been suggested that endocardial and epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) improves outcome in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. We investigated our sequential approach for VT ablation in patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia in a single center.

Methods and Results

We included 47 patients (44±16 years) with definite (81%) or borderline (19%) arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia between 1998 and 2016. Our ablation strategy was to target the endocardial substrate. Epicardial ablation was performed in case of acute ablation failure or lack of an endocardial substrate. Single and multiple procedural 1‐ and 5‐year outcome data for the first occurrence of the study end points (sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation, heart transplant, and death after the index procedure, and sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation for multiple procedures) are reported. Eighty‐one radiofrequency ablation procedures were performed (mean 1.7 per patient, range 1–4). Forty‐five (56%) ablation procedures were performed via an endocardial, 11 (13%) via an epicardial, and 25 (31%) via a combined endo‐ and epicardial approach. Complete acute success was achieved in 65 (80%) procedures, and partial success in 13 (16%). After a median follow‐up of 50.8 (interquartile range, [18.6; 99.2]) months after the index procedure, 17 (36%) patients were free from the primary end point. After multiple procedures, freedom from sustained VT/ventricular fibrillation was 63% (95% CI, 52–75) at 1 year, and 45% (95% CI, 34–61) at 5 years, with 36% of patients receiving only endocardial radiofrequency ablation. A trend (log rank P=0.058) towards an improved outcome using a combined endo‐/epicardial approach was observed after multiple procedures.

Conclusion

Endocardial ablation can be effective in a considerable number of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia patients with VT, potentially obviating the need for an epicardial approach.

P1438Predictors and clinical impact of bleeding events after left atrial appendage closure in patients with high risk or a history of bleeding

Background

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as an alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and may be especially attractive in patients with high risk or a history of bleeding. However, data of clinical benefit and incidence of post-procedural bleeding in patients with both high risk of bleeding and ischemic cerebral stroke after LAAC are lacking.

Objectives

This study sought to identify predictors and the prognostic impact of post-LAAC bleeding in patients at high risk and/or history of bleeding in the direct oral anticoagulant therapy (DOAC) era.

Methods and results

We retrospectively enrolled a total of 195 patients (75 ± 8.7 years, 38% female, 47% with previous major bleeding, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 4.3 ± 1.6 and mean HAS-BLED score 2.7 ± 1.1) undergoing endocardial (91%) or epicardial (9%) LAAC during a mean follow-up of 339 ± 319 days. Twenty-three (11.9%) patients developed procedure-unrelated bleeding events after a median of 147 (43, 362) days after LAAC, in 12/23 (52%) patients under single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), 6/23 (26%) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), 1/23 (4%)  DOAC, 1/23 (4%) VKA, 2/23 (9%) dual therapy (SAPT and DOAC/VKA) and 1/23 (4%) triple therapy (DAPT and DOAC/VKA). (Figure) Diabetes mellitus and previous major bleeding were identified as the independent predictors of post-LAAC bleeding (Odds ratio 2.65 [95% CI:1.04-6.73], p = 0.041, and 5.50 [95% confidence interval:1.72-17.5], p = 0.004). Post-LAAC bleeding was associated with all-cause death (9/23 [39%] vs 18/171 [11%], p = 0.001), but not ischemic stroke/TIA (1/23 [4%] vs 6/171 [4%], p = 0.593) nor device thrombus (2/23 [9%] vs 3/171 [2%], p = 0.108). Kaplan-Meier curve estimated that patients with post-LAAC bleeding had a worse mortality than those without post-LAAC bleeding (3-year mortality; 35.6% [95%CI; 11.6-61.0%] vs 68.7% [45.0-83.8], p = 0.029)

Conclusions

In AF patients with high bleeding risk or history of bleeding undergoing LAAC, bleeding events are common and may occur even after long-term duration after LAAC. Previous major bleeding history strongly predicts subsequent bleeding events following LAAC and is associated with unfavorable mortality. Further investigations are required to identify optimal post-procedural antithrombotic strategies for patients undergoing LAAC with previous major bleeding.

Abstract Figure. The association between time to bleeding

P2846Focal impulse and rotor modulation ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (FIRMAP AF study)

Background

Based on the assumption of trigger elimination, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) currently presents the gold standard of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Recently, rapidly spinning rotors or focal impulse formation has been raised as a crucial sustaining mechanism of AF. Ablation of these rotors may potentially obviate the need for trigger elimination with PVI.

Purpose

This study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation (FIRM) guided catheter ablation only with the gold standard of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Methods

This was a post-market, prospective, single-blinded, randomized, multi-center trial. Patients were enrolled at three centers and equally (1:1) randomized between those undergoing conventional RF ablation with PVI (PVI group) vs. those treated with FIRM-guided RF ablation without PVI (FIRM group). Data was collected at enrollment, procedure, and at 7-day, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up visits. The study was closed early by the sponsor. At the time of study closure, any pending follow-up visits were waived.

Results

From February 2016 until February 2018, a total of 51 (out of a planned 170) patients (mean age 63±10.6 years, 57% male) were enrolled and randomized. Four patients withdrew from the study prior to treatment, resulting in 23 patients allocated to the FIRM group and 24 in the PVI group. Only 13 patients in the FIRM group and 11 patients in the PVI group completed the 12-month follow-up. Statistical analysis was not completed given the small number of patients.

Single-procedure effectiveness (freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence after blanking period) was 52.9% (9/17) in the FIRM group and 85.7% (12/14) in the PVI group at 6 months; and 31.3% (5/16) in the FIRM group and 80% (8/10) in the PVI group at 12 months. Repeat procedures were performed in 45.8% (11/24) patients in the FIRM group and 7.4% (2/27) in the PVI group.

The acute safety endpoint [freedom from procedure-related serious adverse events (SAE)] was achieved in 87% (20/23) of FIRM group patients and 100% (24/24) of PVI group patients. Procedure related SAEs occurred in three patients in the FIRM group: 1 femoral artery aneurysm and 2 injection site hematomas. No additional procedure-related SAEs were reported >7 days post-procedure.

Conclusions

These partial study effectiveness results reinforce the importance of PVI in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation patients and suggest that FIRM-guided ablation alone (without PVI) is not an effective strategy for treatment of paroxysmal AF in most patients. Further study is needed to understand the effectiveness of adding FIRM-guided ablation as an adjunct to PVI in this patient group.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Abbot

P343Comparison of Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Ablation (FIRM) only versus second-generation cyroballoon ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Background

Rotors have been postulated to be a major driver of atrial fibrillation (AF). Initial studies demonstrated, that focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM) might be an effective therapy for the treatment of paroxysmal AF (PAF). However, data about FIRM-guided ablation strategies without PVI is sparse.

Objective

To compare the safety and efficacy of FIRM-guided catheter ablation (without PVI; FIRM arm) and second generation cryoballoon (CB2, CB2 arm) based PVI in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) and de-novo catheter ablation of AF.

Methods

In this retrospective single-center study patients with PAF undergoing de-novo ablation of PAF between February 2016 and January 2017 were enrolled. Patients treated with FIRM-guided AF ablation as a standalone therapy without PVI were included and compared with patients undergoing CB2 based PVI. All patients in the FIRM arm were part of the randomized multicenter FIRMAP AF trial (results of this trial will be presented at this meeting). In patients undergoing FIRM-guided ablation, 3D electroanatomical mapping of both atria was performed. Rotor mapping using FIRM technology was conducted in spontaneous or induced AF. The procedural endpoint was the elimination of all rotors and focal impulses; no PVI was performed in those patients. In the CB2 arm, CB based PVI with the procedural endpoint of isolation of all veins was performed. Procedural data and arrhythmia-free survival after 12 months were compared.

Results

FIRM-guided and CB2 based AF ablation was performed in 22 and 86 patients, respectively. Follow up was completed in 20 and 79 patients LA diameter differed between groups. Otherwise, baseline characteristics did not differ between the FIRM group (mean age 60±11 years, 59.1% males) and the CB2 group (mean age 62±13, 62.4% male).

Arrhythmia-free survival including a 90-day blanking period was 25.0% (15/20) in the FIRM group and 86.1% (11/79) in the CB2 PVI group (p=0.000; Figure 1). Procedure duration was significantly longer in the FIRM group (152 [120; 176] minutes) compared to the CB2 PVI group (122 [110; 145] minutes) (p=0.031), whereas radiation dose was lower in the FIRM group (1266 [1027; 2281] cGy·cm2 vs. 3020 [1677; 4215] cGy·cm2). Adverse events (groin complications) occurred in 1 patient (1.2%) in the CB2 PVI group and 5 patients (22.7%) in the FIRM group.

Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier-survival curve dem

Conclusion

De novo ablation of PAF using a FIRM-guided AF ablation only (without PVI) is associated with poor arrhythmia-free survival after 12 months compared to CB2 PVI. These results underline the importance of PVI as the first-line approach in catheter ablation of AF.

P341Which patients with atrial fibrillation undergo an ablation procedure today in Europe? A report from the ESC-EHRA-EURObservational Research Programme

Aims

Great heterogeneity in rhythm control management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described. The aim of this study was to investigate how selective the patient cohort referred for AF ablation is, as compared to the general AF population in Europe, and to describe the governing mechanisms for such selection.

Methods

Descriptive comparative statistical analyses of the baseline characteristics were performed between the cohorts of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term (ESC-EORP EHRA AFA-LT) Registry, designed to provide a picture of contemporary real-world AF ablation, and the AF population from the AF-General (ESC-EORP EHRA AF-Gen) PilotRegistry. Data collection was performed using a web-based system.

Results

In the AFA and in the AFG pilot registries 3593 and 3049 patients were enrolled, respectively. Patients who underwent AF ablation were younger,more commonly male, and had significantly less co-morbidities. Lone AF was predominant in AFA patients who were at lower risk of stroke (CHA2DS2-VASc >5: 2.9% vs. 24.5%, all P<0.001) and bleeding (HAS-BLED ≥2: 8.5% vs. 40.5%, P<0.001) but with EHRA scores >1 and more prevalentAF-related symptoms such as palpitations, fatigue and weakness (all p<0.001)as compared to the general AF patients. AFA patients were significantly more often male, had higher LV ejection fraction (59.5% vs. 52.4%) and smaller left atrial size on echocardiogram (P<0.001 each).

Conclusions

The comparison of the patient chorts in the AFA and AFG registries showed that AF ablation in European clinical practice is mostly performed in relatively young, symptomatic and otherwise relatively healthy patients.

Acknowledgement/Funding

Abbott Vascular Int.; Amgen Cardiovascular, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance

Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data

BACKGROUND

Robotic (RNS) or magnetic navigation systems (MNS) are available for remotely performed catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

The present study compares remotely assisted catheter navigation (RAN) to standard manual navigation (SMN) and both systems amongst each other.

METHODS

The analysis is based on a sub-cohort enrolled by five hospitals from the multicenter German ablation Registry.

RESULTS

Out of 2442 patients receiving catheter ablation of AF, 267 (age 61.4 ± 10.4, 69.7% male) were treated using RAN (RNS n = 187, 7.7% vs. MNS n = 80, 3.3%). Fluoroscopy time [RNS median 17 (IQR 12-25) min vs. MNS 22 (16-32) min; p < 0.001] and procedure duration [RNS 180 (145-220) min vs. MNS 265 (210-305) min; p < 0.001] were significantly different. Comparing RAN (11%) to SMN (89%) fluoroscopy time (RAN 19 (13-27) min, vs. SMN 25 (16-40) min; p < 0.001), energy delivery (RAN 3168 (2280-3840) s vs. SMN 2640 (IQR 1799-3900) s; p = 0.008) and procedure duration [RAN 195 (150-255) min vs. SMN 150 (120-150) min; p = 0.001] differed significantly. In terms of acute and 12 months outcome, no differences were seen between the two systems or in comparison to SMN.

CONCLUSION

AF ablation can be performed safely, with high acute success rates using RAN. RNS results in less fluoroscopy burden and shorter procedure durations. Compared to SMN, a reduced fluoroscopy burden, prolonged procedure and ablation duration were observed using RAN. Overall, the number of RAN procedures is small suggesting low impact on clinical routine of AF ablation.

Factors determining the choice between subcutaneous or transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Poland in comparison with other European countries: a sub-study of the European Heart Rhythm Association prospective survey

BACKGROUND

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) may be an alternative to transvenous ICD (TV-ICD).

AIM

We sought to evaluate factors determining the choice of S-ICD vs. TV-ICD in Polish patients in comparison to other European countries.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent TV-ICD or S-ICD implantation in centres participating in the European Heart Rhythm Association prospective snapshot survey were included.

RESULTS

During an eight-week study period, 429 patients were recruited, including 136 (31.7%) ICD patients from Poland (eight with S-ICD). In comparison to other European centres, the proportion of S-ICD implantations in Poland was lower (7% vs. 26%, p < 0.001), whereas the ratio of cardiac resynchronisation therapy defibrillator implantations was higher (43% vs. 26%; p < 0.001). Subjects receiving S-ICD in Poland were more often over 75 years old (25% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), in New York Heart Association class II (87.5% vs. 29.4%, p = 0.001), with chronic kidney disease (37.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.003), and with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (32% [14%-50%] vs. 50% [25%-60%], p = 0.04), compared to other European countries. Additionally, in comparison to subjects from other European centres, Polish patients were significantly more often implanted with S-ICD due to prior infection (37.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) and a lack of venous access (25% vs. 0%, p < 0.001), whereas the largest subset of patients in other European countries were implanted with S-ICD because of young age (50% vs. 25%, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The main reasons leading to S-ICD implantations in Polish patients differ from the indications adopted in other European countries. In Poland, patients referred for TV-ICD or S-ICD implantation had more advanced heart failure and more comorbidities in comparison to subjects from other European countries. S-ICD is still underused in Polish patients.