Outcomes in severely ill patients transported without prehospital ALS

Triage Ability of Emergency Medical Services Providers and Patient Disposition: A Prospective Study

Study objective:

To determine the ability of emergency medical services (EMS) providers to subjectively triage patients with respect to hospital admission and to determine patient characteristics associated with increased likelihood of admission.

Methods:

A prospective, cross-sectional study of a consecutive sample of patients arriving by ambulance during the month of February 1997 at an urban, university hospital, Emergency Department. Emergency medical services providers completed a questionnaire asking them to predict admission to the hospital and requested patient demographic information. Predictions were compared to actual patient disposition.

Results:

A total of 887 patients were included in the study, and 315 were admitted to the hospital (36%). With respect to admission, emergency medical services providers had an accuracy rate of 79%, with a sensitivity of 72% and specificity of 83% (kappa = 0.56). Blunt traumatic injury and altered mental status were the most common medical reasons for admission. Variables significantly associated with high admission rates were patients with age > 50 years, chest pain or cardiac complaints, shortness of breath or respiratory complaints, Medicare insurance, and Hispanic ethnicity. The emergency medical services providers most accurately predicted admission for patients presenting with labor (kappa = 1.0), shortness of breath / respiratory complaints (kappa = 0.84), and chest pain (kappa = 0.77).

Conclusion:

Emergency medical services providers can predict final patient disposition with reasonable accuracy, especially for patients presenting with labor, shortness of breath, or chest pain. Certain patient characteristics are associated with a higher rate of actual admission.

MEASURING THE EMS PATIENT ACCESS TIME INTERVAL andTHE IMPACT OF RESPONDING TO HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS

OBJECTIVES

To measure the patient access time interval and characterize its contribution to the total emergency medical services (EMS) response time interval; to compare the patient access time intervals for patients located three or more floors above ground with those less than three floors above or below ground, and specifically in the apartment subgroup; and to identify barriers that significantly impede EMS access to patients in high-rise apartments.

METHODS

An observational study of all patients treated by an emergency medical technician paramedics (EMT-P) crew was conducted using a trained independent observer to collect time intervals and identify potential barriers to access.

RESULTS

Of 118 observed calls, 25 (21%) originated from patients three or more floors above ground. The overall median and 90th percentile (95% confidence interval) patient access time intervals were 1.61 (1.27, 1.91) and 3.47 (3.08, 4.05) minutes, respectively. The median interval was 2.73 (2.22, 3.03) minutes among calls from patients located three or more stories above ground compared with 1.25 (1.07, 1.55) minutes among those at lower levels. The patient access time interval represented 23.5% of the total EMS response time interval among calls originating less than three floors above or below ground and 32.2% of those located three or more stories above ground. The most frequently encountered barriers to access included security code entry requirements, lack of directional signs, and inability to fit the stretcher into the elevator.

CONCLUSIONS

The patient access time interval is significantly long and represents a substantial component of the total EMS response time interval, especially among ambulance calls originating three or more floors above ground. A number of barriers appear to contribute to delayed paramedic access.

Prehospital care of the injured: what's new

Emergency medical services (EMS) play a critical role in the trauma system as the point of initial patient care and stabilization and in determining the regional flow of patients and the commitment of resources to the critically injured. Trauma surgeons and emergency physicians need to be involved in the organizational planning of EMS systems to ensure that uniform patient care protocols are developed for triage and treatment. Ongoing efforts should focus on addressing national variability in care provided after injury to ensure optimal outcome for patients in all regions. Through additional research, the best practice and optimal EMS system design will continue to be defined.

Effect of socioeconomic status on out-of-hospital transport delays of patients with chest pain

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The effect of socioeconomic status on out-of-hospital care has not been widely examined. We determine whether socioeconomic status was associated with out-of-hospital transport delays for patients with chest pain.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with chest pain transported by means of ambulance in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, in 1999 was conducted. The primary outcome measure was the 90th percentile system response interval, with secondary outcomes being the 90th percentile on-scene interval, transport interval, and total out-of-hospital interval. Socioeconomic status was the primary independent variable. Covariates were age, sex, case severity, dispatch and return priority, time and day of transport, paramedic training, and percentage of high-rise apartments in the region.

RESULTS

Four thousand three hundred fifty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. The 90th percentile system response interval and total out-of-hospital interval were 11 minutes and 49 minutes, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the highest socioeconomic status neighborhoods were significantly associated with decreased system response interval (34.0 seconds; 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.2 to 70.9 seconds) and transport interval (132.3 seconds; 95% CI 24.1 to 229.6 seconds). In addition, age (+45.3 seconds per 10 years; 95% CI 13.3 to 75.1 seconds), female sex (+205.0 seconds; 95% CI 78.1 to 287.7 seconds), and advanced care paramedic crews (+371.6 seconds; 95% CI 263.3 to 490.1 seconds) were associated with delays in total out-of-hospital interval. Lastly, calls originating from the highest socioeconomic status neighborhoods were dispatched the highest proportion of advanced care paramedic crews, despite similar dispatch priorities and case severities.

CONCLUSION

High socioeconomic status neighborhoods were associated with shorter out-of-hospital transport intervals for patients with chest pain. In addition, out-of-hospital delays were associated with age, sex, and advanced care paramedic crew type, with calls from the highest socioeconomic status neighborhoods being most likely to receive advanced care paramedic crews.

Evaluation of emergency medical services systems: a classification to assist in determination of indicators

Emergency medical services (EMS) systems, and prehospital care are difficult to evaluate. Accordingly, the true efficacy and value of such systems are difficult to determine. The multitude of variations and combinations of involved factors makes standardisation and comparison difficult, and universal indicators are hard to develop. Various attempts have been made to determine valid indicators of effectiveness, but there has been little success. Prehospital care has been seen by some as a single entity. As a result, experience from well resourced first world trauma centres has been taken, by many, to be applicable to all prehospital situations. This article attempts to assist in the development of valid EMS indicators of performance and effectiveness by categorising prehospital scenarios into a classification reflecting the reality of their conditions of practice.

How do ambulance personnel experience work at a disaster site?

Working at a major accident site is a complex matter where knowledge from various fields must be put into practice. In addition, the different situations at emergency and disaster sites place a variety of demands on personnel, equipment and organization. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the ambulance personnel perceived their own action and the functioning of the whole emergency organization at a major accident site (large discotheque fire) in 1998. Working from a list obtained from the fire department, a questionnaire with 57 questions was sent to the personnel (n = 36) who had participated at the accident site either as ambulance crew members or as members of a medical team sent out from the hospital. The response rate was 80 per cent. Despite the extreme situation, most of the ambulance personnel involved were satisfied with their own preparedness as well as the medical and nursing care performed at the site. Those who where not satisfied reported that the main reason for dissatisfaction was lack of time to calm and comfort people who were not injured or had only minor injuries. The need of more medical support for the medical team members at the site was also emphasized with regard to the care of the severely injured. The ambulance service crews from the suburbs, in comparison with the local city rescue service, were, in general, less satisfied with the co-operation from other rescue units.

Predictors of Demand for Emergency Prehospital Care: An Australian Study

Introduction:

Determining the predictors of demand for emergency prehospital care can assist ambulance services in undertaking policy and planning activities.

Hypothesis:

Demand for prehospital care can be explained by demographic, health status, and economic determinants.

Methods:

The study used a cross-sectional design to investigate the association of demographic, health status, and insurance factors with the use of prehospital, ambulance care. Core data items including age, gender, marital status, country of origin, triage score, diagnosis, time of presentation, method of arrival, and patient disposition were collected for every patient who pre-sented at the Emergency Department of the study hospital over a four-month period. Ambulance usage was analysed using Poisson regression.

Results:

For the 10,229 patients surveyed, only a small number were triaged as having the highest level of urgent medical need (0.8%), but the majority of these used prehospital emergency medical care (90.2%). Predictors of ambulance use included age >65years (Prevalence Ratio [Prevalence Ratio] = 2.92; 95% confidence interval [ Confidence Interval]: 2.35–3.63), being married or in a defacto relationship (Prevalence Ratio = 0.69; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.60–0.79) or divorced, separated, or widowed (Prevalence Ratio = 0.83; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.70–0.98), triage score level 1 or 2 (Prevalence Ratio = 1.95; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.68–2.28), or triage score level 3 (Prevalence Ratio = 1.54; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.38–1.72), diagnosis involving either mental (Prevalence Ratio = 4.29; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.84–10.01), nervous (Prevalence Ratio = 2.74; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.19–6.31) or trauma (Prevalence Ratio = 2.33; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.03–5.27) conditions, and insurance status (Prevalence Ratio =1.54; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.40–1.71). Ethnicity, gender, and time of day were not associated with usage.

Conclusion:

Demand for ambulance services can be predicted by a number of demographic, medical status, and insurance variables. Age and triage levels are key influences on demand for ambulance services. Ambulance insurance status provides an economic incentive to use ambulance services regardless of the urgency of the medical condition.

Inappropriate use of emergency medical services transport: comparison of provider and patient perspectives

OBJECTIVES

To determine the extent of inappropriate ambulance use from the perspectives of both emergency medical services (EMS) providers and patients utilizing EMS transport, assess level of agreement, and identify variables associated with inappropriate ambulance use.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was done of a consecutive sample of patients arriving by ambulance during the month of February 1997 at an urban university hospital ED. EMS providers and patients completed a survey with questions regarding their perceptions of whether the need for ambulance transport was an emergency or a nonemergency. Patient demographic information and availability of alternate means of transportation to the hospital were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Eight hundred eighty-seven patients were included in the study. EMS providers thought that 501 patient transports were appropriate and represented true emergencies, whereas 689 patients believed their medical problems were true emergencies. A significant number of patients (n=415, 47%) had access to alternative transportation to the hospital. Blunt traumatic injury and altered mental status were the most common reasons for EMS transport. Patient characteristics significantly associated with EMS provider perception of a true emergency were male gender, age >51 years, higher education, chest pain/cardiac complaints, shortness of breath/respiratory complaints, and Medicare insurance. Characteristics significantly associated with patients who perceived themselves to have true emergencies were black ethnicity, higher education, shortness of breath/respiratory complaints, and Medicare insurance. There was 75% agreement between EMS providers and patients on appropriateness of ambulance transport (kappa=0.84).

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate ambulance use is a significant problem from both EMS provider and patient perspectives. Certain patient characteristics are associated with a higher probability of appropriate and inappropriate uses of EMS transport. A large number of patients transported by ambulance have alternative means of transportation but elect not to use them.