Effect of suprarenal versus infrarenal aortic endograft fixation on renal function and renal artery patency: a comparative study with intermediate follow-up

Contrast-induced nephropathy in non-cardiac vascular procedures, a narrative review: Part 1

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is an important complication of iodinated contrast medium (CM) administration, which is associated with both short- and long-term adverse outcomes (e.g., cardiorenal events, longer hospital stay, and mortality). CIN has been mainly studied in relation to cardiac procedures, but it can also occur following non-cardiac vascular interventions. This is Part 1 of a narrative review summarizing the available literature on CIN after non-cardiac vascular diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for aortic aneurysm and carotid stenosis. We discuss the definition, pathophysiology, incidence, risk factors, biomarkers, and consequences of CIN in these settings, as well as preventive strategies and alternatives to limit iodinated CM use. Physicians and vascular surgeons should be aware of CM-related adverse events and the potential strategies to avoid them. Clearly, more research in this important field is required.

Proximal fixation of endovascular aortic device may not be associated with renal function decline after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE

Significant debate exists among providers who perform endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) regarding the renal function change between suprarenal (SuF) and infrarenal (InF) fixation devices. The purpose of this study is to review our institution's experience using these devices in terms of renal function.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all elective EVARs performed within a three-site health system (Florida, Minnesota, and Arizona) during the period of 2000 to 2018. The primary outcome was renal function decline on long-term follow-up depending on the anatomical fixation of the device (SuF vs InF). Secondary outcomes were length of hospitalization (LOH) and progression to hemodialysis. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to test for associations affecting LOH.

RESULTS

There were 1130 elective EVARs included in our review. Of those, 670 (59.3%) had SuF and 460 (40.7%) InF. Long-term follow-up was 4.8 ± 3.7 years, and the rate of change in creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were not statistically significant among groups (SuF vs InF). LOH was higher in those individuals with a SuF device (3.4 ± 2.2 vs 2.3 ± 1.0 days; P < .001). Ten patients with chronic kidney disease progressed to hemodialysis at 6.7 ± 3.8 years from EVAR. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with chronic kidney disease with SuF were more likely to progress to hemodialysis (P = .039). On multivariable regression, female sex (Coef, 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.41; P = .02), SuF (Coef, 9.5; 95% CI, 0.11-1.11; P < .0001), and intraoperative blood loss of greater than 150 mL (Coef, 15.4; 95% CI, 0.11-1.76; P < .0001) were predictors of prolonged LOH.

CONCLUSION

Our three-site, single-institution data indicate that, although the starting eGFR was statistically lower in those individuals undergoing elective EVAR with InF, device fixation type did not affect the creatinine and eGFR on long-term follow-up. However, caution should be exercised at the time of abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in those individuals who already presented with renal dysfunction.

Early Postoperative Renal Dysfunction Predicts Long-Term Renal Function Degradation after Type IV Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgical Repair

BACKGROUND

Type IV thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgical repair is often complicated by postoperative acute kidney injury. The aim was to evaluate early renal injury influence on long-term renal function.

METHODS

All type IV thoracoabdominal surgical repair performed between January 2000 and January 2014 in our tertiary hospital were included in this retrospective observational study. All procedures were performed through a retroperitoneal approach with at least suprarenal aortic cross-clamping. Cold Ringer Lactate was used to perfuse the kidneys. Serum creatinine (Scr.) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were recorded preoperatively, daily until discharge and at least annually during follow-up. Postoperative renal dysfunction was classified using the RIFLE score. Predictors of long-term renal decline were identified by logistic regression and a Cox model.

RESULTS

Of total, 80 patients were included. Aortic clamping level was suprarenal (10%), supramesenteric (37%) or supracoeliac (53%). Ischemic durations were 29 ± 9 min for the gastrointestinal tract and the right kidney, 54 ± 28 min for the left kidney. Three patients died postoperatively. At discharge, 31 (38.8%) patients did not have a postoperative renal impairment (RIFLE-), compared with 49 (61.2%) who had a renal dysfunction (RIFLE+). GFR was 89 ± 29 ml/min vs 68 ± 37 ml/min, respectively (P < 0.01). In the RIFLE + group, Scr. was increased by x1.5 (Risk) for 22 patients, x2 (Injury) for 19 patients, and ×3 (Failure) for 8 patients. Mean follow-up was 59 months. Eighteen patients died, and 2 patients started permanent dialysis at 46 and 118 months during follow-up. The only predictive factor of long-term GFR degradation was a postoperative GFR below 45 ml/min (OR: 16.5; 95%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative renal dysfunction was a frequent complication, associated with long-term renal function degradation.

The effect of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair on Renal Function in Patients Treated for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Aim:

The effect of endovascular aneurysm repair in patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm has not been clearly defined. The objective of the present article was to provide a contemporary literature review and perform an analysis to determine the effect of EVAR on renal function in the early post-operative period and during follow-up.

Methods:

A systematic review of the literature was undertaken to identify all studies reporting the effect of EVAR on renal function. Outcome data were pooled and combined overall effect sizes were calculated using fixed or random-effects models.

Results:

Thirty-two studies reporting on 24846 patients were included. Acute renal failure after EVAR occurred with an estimated frequency of 9% (95%CI: 5-16%; I2=97%). Median follow-up period was 19.5 months (range 1-60 months). The estimated frequency of chronic renal failure during follow-up was 7% (95%CI: 3-17%; I2=98%). Hemodialysis was required in 2% (1-3%; I2=97%) of the cases.

Conclusion:

High-level evidence demonstrating the effect of EVAR on the incidence of acute and chronic renal failure is lacking. Based on the current available data, nearly 10% of patients undergoing EVAR for AAA have an increased risk for renal dysfunction after the procedure. Whether this deterioration may lead to a worse outcome has not been adequately proved.

Abdominal aortic aneurysms: pre- and post-procedural imaging

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a relatively common, potentially life-threatening disorder. Rupture of AAA is potentially catastrophic with high mortality. Intervention for AAA is indicated when the aneurysm reaches 5.0-5.5 cm or more, when symptomatic, or when increasing in size > 10 mm/year. AAA can be accurately assessed by cross-sectional imaging including computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Current options for intervention in AAA patients include open surgery and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), with EVAR becoming more prevalent over time. Cross-sectional imaging plays a crucial role in AAA surveillance, pre-procedural assessment, and post-EVAR management. This paper will discuss the current role of imaging in the assessment of AAA patients prior to intervention, in evaluation of procedural complications, and in long-term follow-up of EVAR patients.

Meta-analysis of Renal Function Following Infrarenal EVAR using Suprarenal or Infrarenal Fixation Devices

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND

The effect of suprarenal (SR) as opposed to infrarenal (IR) fixation on renal outcomes post-endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) remains controversial. This meta-analysis aims to update current understanding of this issue.

METHODS

A prior meta-analysis was updated through a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses search for additional studies published in the last 3 years reporting on renal dysfunction or related outcomes post-EVAR. Random effects meta-analysis was undertaken using SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 25 non-randomised studies comparing SR with IR fixation were included, totalling 54,832 patients. In total, 16,634 underwent SR and 38,198 IR. Baseline characteristics, including age, baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, cardiac disease, and smoking, were similar between the groups. There was a small but significant difference in outcomes for renal dysfunction at the study end point (SR 5.98% vs. IR 4.83%; odds ratio [OR] 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.40 [p < .001]); however, at 30 days and 12 months there was no significant difference, and this did not hold up to sensitivity analysis. Incidence of renal infarcts (SR 6.6% vs. IR 2.3%; OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.46-5.29 [p = .002]), renal stenosis (SR 2.4% vs. IR 0.8%; OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.00-8.38 [p = .05]), and renal artery occlusion (SR 2.4% vs. IR 1.2%; OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.15-4.25 [p = 0.02]) favoured IR fixation; however, there was no difference in haemodialysis rates.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has identified small but significantly worse renal outcomes in patients having SR fixation devices compared with IR; however, there was no difference in dialysis rates and a small effect on renal dysfunction, which did not stand up to rigorous sensitivity analysis. This should be taken into consideration during graft selection, and further studies must assess renal outcomes in the longer term, and in those with pre-existing renal dysfunction.

Comparison of Endovascular Stent Grafts for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Medicare Beneficiaries

BACKGROUND

Increased renal complications have been suggested with suprarenal stent grafts, but long-term analyses have been limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of endograft choice on perioperative and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We compared Medicare beneficiaries undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysms repair from 2005 to 2008 with endografts with infrarenal fixation and a single docking limb (AneuRx, Excluder) to those with suprarenal fixation and 2 docking limbs (Zenith), or a unibody configuration (Powerlink). Propensity score weighting accounted for differences in patient characteristics among the different graft formations, and perioperative mortality, complications, and length of stay and 4-year rates of survival, rupture, and reintervention were compared.

RESULTS

Forty-six thousand one hundred seventy-one Medicare beneficiaries were identified including 11,002 (24%) with suprarenal fixation, 32,909 (71%) with infrarenal fixation, and 2,260 (5%) with a unibody graft. After propensity score weighting, there were no significant differences in patients' baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. The suprarenal fixation patients had higher rates of perioperative mortality (1.7% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.01), renal failure (6.0% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), and mesenteric ischemia (0.7% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.01) and longer length of stay (3.4 days vs. 3.0 days, P < 0.001) compared with patients with infrarenal fixation. Unibody grafts had higher rates of renal failure (5.9% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001), mesenteric ischemia (1.0% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), and conversion to open repair (0.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001) compared to those with infrarenal fixation and single docking limbs. At 4 years, mortality remained slightly higher with suprarenal compared to infrarenal fixation (30% vs. 29%, P = 0.047), although these patients had fewer conversions to open repair (0.6% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.03) and aneurysm-related reinterventions (10% vs. 12%, P < 0.01). At 4 years, unibody grafts had more aneurysm-related interventions compared to infrarenal fixation grafts (15% vs. 12%, P < 0.01) but fewer conversions to open repair (0.4% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.02). Late rupture did not differ among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to infrarenal fixation devices, patients who underwent EVAR with suprarenal fixation had higher perioperative mortality and renal complications but fewer reinterventions including conversion, while the unibody graft had more perioperative complications and aneurysm-related reinterventions, but fewer conversions to open repair. Although these differences could be explained by selection bias, these data suggest that further comparative effectiveness analyses should be performed to understand the outcomes following EVAR with suprarenal fixation and unibody grafts.

Comparison of Renal Complications between Endografts with Suprarenal and Infrarenal Fixation

OBJECTIVES

Surgeons have multiple grafts options available for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR), and some hypothesize that suprarenal fixation endografts may result in higher rates of renal complications than infrarenal endografts. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of contemporary suprarenal and infrarenal endografts.

METHODS

The Targeted Vascular Module of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project was utilised to identify patients undergoing EVAR for infrarenal aneurysm from 2011 to 2013. Pre-operative and operative variables and 30 day outcomes were compared among suprarenal (Zenith and Endurant) and infrarenal fixation devices (Excluder). Renal complications included creatinine increase > 2 mg/dL or new dialysis, as defined by NSQIP. Multivariate regression was completed to account for patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 3587 patients were evaluated including 2273 (63%) with suprarenal grafts and 1314 (37%) with infrarenal grafts. Patients with suprarenal grafts were less commonly white (84% vs. 88%, p < .01) and more commonly male (83% vs. 80%, p = .03). There were no differences in age or comorbidities. Renal complications (1.1% vs. 0.1%, p < .01) and length of stay more than 2 days (34% vs. 25%, p < .01) occurred more commonly after suprarenal fixation. After adjustment, suprarenal grafts had significantly higher rates of renal complications (OR, 12.0; 95% CI, 1.6-91) and length of stay more than 2 days (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7).

CONCLUSION

Overall rates of renal complications following EVAR are low. Patients selected for suprarenal stent grafts are at increased risk of renal complications and prolonged length of stay, which may be due to selection bias, deployment techniques, or the presence of a bare stent overlying the renal arteries. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the mechanism and duration of renal dysfunction and important long-term outcomes of interest.

Renal Function after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: A Single-Center Experience with Transrenal versus Infrarenal Fixation

Purpose:

To describe the short-term consequences of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) on renal function after infrarenal (IR) versus transrenal (TR) stent-graft fixation.

Methods:

Between December 1996 and January 2006, 369 consecutive patients were treated with EVAR. All patients had an AneuRx or a Talent stent-graft implanted using IR (AneuRx) or transrenal (Talent) fixation. Post-EVAR, a standardized follow-up scheme included computed tomography (CT) scanning and serum creatinine measurements at 2 days, 3 months, and 12 months. Postoperative renal dysfunction was defined as a >20% decrease in serum creatinine clearance compared to baseline, the presence of new-onset dialysis, or both. Of the 369 patients, 309 (291 men; mean age 71±7 years, range 63–82) had complete 1-year follow-up and were included in this study. An IR stent-graft was placed in 190 patients, and a TR stent-graft was placed in the remaining 119 patients.

Results:

At discharge, renal dysfunction occurred in 3.7% of the patients in the IR group versus 5.9% in the TR group (p=NS) and rose significantly to 13.7% in the IR group (p=0.001) and 15.1% in the TR group (p=0.02) at the 1-year follow-up. However, no significant difference was noted between the IR and TR groups at either time point. At the 1-year follow-up, at least 50% of renal dysfunction was caused by obstructions of (accessory) renal arteries and renal infarctions. During the follow-up interval, 3 (0.97%) of 309 patients underwent new-onset dialysis.

Conclusion:

Both infrarenal and transrenal fixation techniques in EVAR will lead to a significant rise in renal dysfunction during the first year. A few patients with dysfunction will require dialysis.

The association of simple renal cysts with abdominal aortic aneurysms and their impact on renal function after endovascular aneurysm repair

We validated the association of simple renal cysts with abdominal aortic aneurysm and other cardiovascular factors and assessed simple renal cysts’ impact on renal function before and after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. Computed tomography angiograms of 100 consecutive male patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (Group 1) were reviewed and compared with 100 computed tomography angiogram of aged-matched male patients without abdominal aortic aneurysm (Group 2). Patients’ demographic data, risk factors, abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter, the presence of simple renal cyst and laboratory tests were recorded. No difference was observed between the two groups in respect to other cardiovascular risk factors except hyperlipidemia with higher prevalence in Group 1 ( p < 0.05). Presence of simple renal cysts was independently associated with age ( p < 0.05) and abdominal aortic aneurysm ( p = 0.0157). There was no correlation between simple renal cysts and abdominal aortic aneurysm size or pre-operative creatinine and urea levels. No difference was observed in post-operative creatinine and urea levels either immediately after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair or in 12-month follow-up. In male patients, the presence of simple renal cysts is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm and is increasing with age. However, their presence is neither associated with impaired renal function pre-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and post-endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair nor after 12-month follow-up.

A systematic review and meta-analysis indicates underreporting of renal dysfunction following endovascular aneurysm repair

Deterioration in renal function has been described after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (EVRs). The etiology is multifactorial and represents an important therapeutic target. A need exists to quantitatively summarize incidence and severity of renal dysfunction after EVR to allow better-informed attempts to preserve renal function and improve life expectancy. Here a systematic search was performed using Medline and Embase for renal function after EVR applying PRISMA statements. Univariate and multivariate random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled postoperative changes in serum creatinine and creatinine clearance at four time points after EVR. Clinically relevant deterioration in renal function was also estimated at 1 year or more after EVR. Pooled probability of clinically relevant deterioration in renal function at 1 year or more was 18% (95% confidence interval of 14-23%, I2 of 82.5%). Serum creatinine increased after EVR by 0.05 mg/dl at 30 days/1 month, 0.09 mg/dl at 1 month to 1 year, and 0.11 mg/dl at 1 year or more (all significant). Creatinine clearance decreased after EVR by 5.65 ml/min at 1 month-1 year and by 6.58 ml/min at 1 year or more (both significant). Thus, renal dysfunction after EVR is common and merits attention.

Risk factors and impact of proximal fixation on acute and chronic renal dysfunction after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using glomerular filtration rate criteria

BACKGROUND

The incidence of renal impairment relevant to proximal fixation of aortic endograft devices remains unclear.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of 208 consecutive patients that underwent EVAR from 2006 to 2011. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was based on MDRD study equation. Acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) were classified with ADIQ/RIFLE criteria and National Kidney Foundation criteria, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curve was applied to evaluate progression to CKD. Multivariate regression model was fit to identify predictors for developing AKI and CKD.

RESULTS

Suprarenal fixation group (SF) included 110 patients and infrarenal fixation group (IF) included 98 patients. Both groups had similar demographics, baseline eGFR, and renal-protection protocols. There was a trend for decreased use of contrast in IF group (median: 93.5 vs. 103 cc, P = 0.07). AKI occurred in 15% of patients in SF group and 19% of patients in IF group (RR: 1.24, P = 0.47). The freedom from progression to stage 3 or 4 CKD in the SF group was 0.76, 0.72, and 0.49 at 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively, while for IF group was 0.8, 0.73, and 0.68, respectively (P = 0.4). Increasing age (P = 0.07), lengthy procedures (P < 0.001), and baseline renal dysfunction (P < 0.001) were significant predictors for developing CKD. Contrast volume (P < 0.001) and ace-inhibitors (P = 0.07) were predictors for AKI.

CONCLUSION

Proximal fixation type has no significant effect on both acute and chronic renal function. Identification of modifiable perioperative risk factors may be used to improve renal function outcomes.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm: Treatment options, image visualizations and follow-up procedures

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a common vascular disease that affects elderly population. Open surgical repair is regarded as the gold standard technique for treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm, however, endovascular aneurysm repair has rapidly expanded since its first introduction in 1990s. As a less invasive technique, endovascular aneurysm repair has been confirmed to be an effective alternative to open surgical repair, especially in patients with co-morbid conditions. Computed tomography (CT) angiography is currently the preferred imaging modality for both preoperative planning and post-operative follow-up. 2D CT images are complemented by a number of 3D reconstructions which enhance the diagnostic applications of CT angiography in both planning and follow-up of endovascular repair. CT has the disadvantage of high cummulative radiation dose, of particular concern in younger patients, since patients require regular imaging follow-ups after endovascular repair, thus, exposing patients to repeated radiation exposure for life. There is a trend to change from CT to ultrasound surveillance of endovascular aneurysm repair. Medical image visualizations demonstrate excellent morphological assessment of aneurysm and stent-grafts, but fail to provide hemodynamic changes caused by the complex stent-graft device that is implanted into the aorta. This article reviews the treatment options of abdominal aortic aneurysm, various image visualization tools, and follow-up procedures with use of different modalities including both imaging and computational fluid dynamics methods. Future directions to improve treatment outcomes in the follow-up of endovascular aneurysm repair are outlined.

Comparative analysis of renal function after treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms with a suprarenal fixation device as opposed to open surgery

We analyzed the repercussions on renal function between suprarenal endograft fixation and open surgery in the treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (IAAAs) and determined the influential factors. Between 1999 and 2005, 59 IAAAs were treated with elective OS and 56 with SEF. The serum creatinine (Cr) level and its clearance were determined before the procedure, in the intensive care unit (ICU), on discharge, and after 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. A deterioration in renal function was considered to be a >30% increase in Cr or a Cr >2 mg/dL. A univariate statistical analysis and a logistical regression analysis were carried out to determine the predictive factors for repercussions on renal function. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of renal exacerbation between the groups either on discharge (p = 0.52) or after 1 month (p = 0.483), 6 months (p = 0.451), 12 months (p = 0.457), and 24 months (p = 0.682). The only significant difference was that detected in the ICU (p = 0.033). Diabetes mellitus, time spent in the ICU, postoperative intubation time, intraoperative transfusion, and transfusion in the ICU were factors that influenced the deterioration of renal function in the univariate analysis. The only significant factor in the multivariate analysis was the need for transfusion in the ICU. Exacerbation of renal function occurred in both groups independently of treatment type. In the immediate postoperative period, hemodynamic deterioration is more frequent in the open surgery group. Renal exacerbation tended to disappear in both groups during follow-up.

Suprarenal endograft fixation and medium-term renal function: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Suprarenal fixation is widely used in endovascular aneurysm repair. Numerous small, underpowered studies have concluded that it does not increase the risk of renal impairment compared with infrarenal fixation. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that renal infarction is more common with suprarenal fixation, but the effect on renal function remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic abstract databases, article reference lists, and conference proceedings were searched for series reporting renal function data after suprarenal fixation. There was considerable study heterogeneity with respect to key factors such as pre-existing renal dysfunction and length of follow-up. Authors were contacted to obtain individual patient data for a pooled reanalysis using standardized criteria.

RESULTS

Of 46 potentially relevant citations, only 11 were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Complete data sets were available for four studies (1065 patients), with a median follow-up of 33 months. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed for postoperative renal impairment in the suprarenal fixation and infrarenal fixation groups and compared by the log-rank test. Median time free of renal impairment was 38.5 months in the infrarenal fixation group compared with 32.4 months in the suprarenal fixation group (P = .0038). However, to account for significant methodologic differences, further analysis was required using a Weibull regression model fitted in open Bayesian inference using Gibbs sampling (BUGS). The pooled hazard ratio for deterioration of renal function after suprarenal fixation was 0.6 (95% confidence interval, 0.3-10).

CONCLUSION

Currently available data are insufficient to determine the precise effect of suprarenal fixation on medium-term renal function. Conventional Kaplan-Meier analysis of the pooled data set suggested that suprarenal fixation increased the risk of renal dysfunction; however, the effect disappeared when sophisticated statistical modelling was performed to account for study heterogeneity. A randomised controlled trial of suprarenal fixation may resolve this issue.

Effect of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia: assessment of morphological changes by virtual intravascular endoscopy

PURPOSE

To investigate the morphological effects of suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on the renal artery ostia (RaO) by analysis of suprarenal stent wire distribution and vascular calcification across the RaO using virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE).

METHODS

Fourteen consecutive patients (11 men; mean age 75 years) from a single institution were studied following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) using the Zenith endograft system from September 1999 to March 2002. Imaging assessment included computed tomographic (CT) measurement of renal artery intraluminal ostial diameter and quantification and analysis of uncovered stent struts across the RaO and radiological determination of RaO calcification. Morphological changes following EVAR at 3 time points (before and within 1 week after stent-grafting, and at the most recent follow-up) were compared for each patient to determine whether suprarenal stent struts or RaO calcification affected intraluminal ostial diameter. Renal function was assessed by temporal measurements of serum creatinine concentration and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

The renal ostium was distorted to variable degrees in all cases at a mean follow-up of 41+/-6.6 months. An increase in ostial diameter was identified in most patients if the right RaO was calcified when comparing the 1-week postoperative and most recent follow-up CT images (p<0.05). There was no direct relationship between the number of stent struts crossing the RaO and the morphological/dimensional changes (p>0.05). Renal function was not significantly affected.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing suprarenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts experienced morphological changes of the RaO to a variable extent at midterm follow-up. Although the presence of stent struts did not significantly affect dimensional changes, we observed that calcification at the renal artery ostium may influence the development of atherosclerotic effects as a direct relationship between the calcification and ostial diameter. Future studies utilizing VIE to determine the long-term safety of this technique in these particular patients requires investigation.

Stent implantation across the ostia of the renal veins does not necessarily cause renal impairment when treating inferior vena cava occlusion

The effect of inferior vena cava (IVC) stents crossing the ostia of the renal veins on renal function has not been reported. The purpose of this study is to report a single-institution experience with four cases of IVC stent implantation for malignant compression and/or invasion of the IVC causing severe lower-extremity edema. The patients' symptoms were successfully relieved, and follow-up imaging and serum creatinine measurements for the remainder of their lives revealed no evidence of renal impairment or renal vein thrombosis.

Feasibility of renal artery stenting before, during, and after endovascular aneurysm repair with suprarenal fixation endograft

Suprarenal fixation by means of proximal bare stent may help prevent endograft migration and proximal endoleak. It seems not to compromise renal perfusion and function; however, it is still unclear whether its presence is in conflict with stenting of the renal arteries to treat associated renal stenosis. We report five cases of renal artery stenting performed before, at the same time, or after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm with a suprarenal fixation endograft (Zenith; Cook, Biaverskov, Denmark). Suprarenal fixation endograft seems not to affect renal artery stenting regardless the timing of the procedure.

Visceral and Renal Artery Complications of Suprarenal Fixation during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

BACKGROUND

The effect of suprarenal fixation of endovascular grafts on renal and visceral artery function remains undefined. This study aimed to determine renal and visceral artery complications following suprarenal fixation during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVR).

METHODS

Prospectively collected data from 112 patients who received suprarenal fixation (group SF) and 36 patients who received infrarenal fixation (group IF) in a single institution from December 1997 to April 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. Median follow-up was 26 months (range 0.1-101 months).

RESULTS

Stent struts extended to or above the level of 106 (94.6%) right renal arteries, 104 (92.9%) left renal arteries, 49 (43.8%) superior mesenteric arteries (SMA), and 7 (6.3%) celiac arteries in group SF. This group had 2 (1.8%) unintentional main renal artery occlusions, of which 1 was successfully treated at the first procedure with a renal stent. There was 1 (0.9%) SMA occlusion which resulted in bowel infarction and death. Group IF had no renal or visceral artery complications. There were no late-onset occlusions or infarcts. There was no significant difference in median serum creatinine between groups SF and IF at 1 month (p = 0.18) and 6 months to 12 months (p = 0.22) follow-up. The change in serum creatinine over time was also not significantly different within each group (SF, p = 0.09; IF, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, suprarenal fixation was associated with a very small incidence of immediate renal and visceral artery occlusion. There did not appear to be any medium-term sequelae of suprarenal fixation.

Durability of renal artery stents in patients with transrenal abdominal aortic endografts

OBJECTIVE

The management of renal artery stenosis in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms continues to be complex and technically challenging despite advances in endovascular therapy. There is growing concern about the durability of renal artery stents in the setting of transrenal abdominal aortic endografts. This study reports a single-center experience of renal artery stenting with transrenal abdominal aortic endografts for patients with renal artery stenosis.

METHODS

All patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair preceded or followed by renal artery stent placement between January 1999 and December 2005 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively gathered endovascular database. Patients were surveyed after renal stent procedures with multidetector computed tomography angiography or duplex sonography. The surveillance data were analyzed for primary patency of the renal artery stent at 6 months, incidence of complications, need for secondary interventions, and changes in creatinine clearance (CrCl).

RESULTS

Sixty-two renal artery stents were placed in 56 patients (44 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 77.3 years (range, 61 to 94 years). Forty-one were placed before the endograft procedure, eight were placed during the endograft procedure, and 13 were placed postoperatively. There were no major or minor complications related to the renal artery stent procedures. Transrenal aortic endografts were used in 44 of the 56 patients, and 12 had devices with infrarenal fixation. The mean follow-up was 18.5 months (range, 1 to 73 months). The 6-month primary patency, which could be evaluated for 51 renal artery stents, was 97.4% (37/38) in patients with transrenal fixation and 84.6% (11/13) in patients with infrarenal fixation. The overall rate of in-stent restenosis was 8.5% (4/47) in the transrenal fixation group and 20.0% (3/15) in the infrarenal fixation group. The overall occlusion rate was 2.1% (1/47) in the transrenal fixation group and 0% (0/15) in infrarenal fixation group. Five (83.3%) of six patients underwent successful treatment of in-stent restenosis with placement of a new stent in all five cases. CrCl decreased in the total group by 4.2 +/- 11.8 mL/min, by 4.7 +/- 12.0 mL/min in patients with transrenal fixation, and by 2.2 +/- 11.0 mL/min in patients with infrarenal fixation.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a transrenal aortic endograft did not affect the outcome of the renal artery revascularization procedure in this cohort. Renal artery stenting in the presence of transrenal abdominal aortic endografts appears to be a safe procedure without adverse effect on renal artery stent patency or renal function.

The Mid-term Effect of Bare Metal Suprarenal Fixation on Renal Function Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the mid term effect of proximal bare metal fixation design on renal function in patients undergoing endovascular repair (EVR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).

METHODS

Consecutive EVR patients for AAA from December 1995-2001 were included and grouped to either infrarenal (Group 1) or uncovered suprarenal (Group 2) fixation. Peri-operative renal function and at 6, 12 and 24 months was determined by serum creatinine (sCr mmol l(-1)) and Cockroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrC ml min(-1)). Changes in renal function were compared using non-parametric analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 179 EVR procedures during this six-year period, paired renal data was available for 135 patients at a minimal follow-up of 6 months (Gp1, n = 63; Gp2, n = 72). Median pre-EVR sCr and CrC were 113, 57 in Group 1 and 108, 58 in Group 2, p = NS. There was no significant deterioration in renal function within or between either group at 2 years post-EVR: median sCr, CrC values were 118, 56 (Group 1) and 111, 56 (Group 2), all p = NS.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests mid-term renal function remains unaffected following EVR of AAA, irrespective of proximal fixation type. Designs to improve stent durability and EVR applicability do not appear to compromise renal function.

Comparison of renal function after endovascular aneurysm repair with different transrenally fixated endografts

OBJECTIVE

Transrenal fixation of abdominal aortic endografts may provide a more secure proximal attachment with few deleterious effects with respect to renal function. This study's purpose was to determine whether different metals used in two commercially available endografts (Cook Zenith and Medtronic Talent) result in different effects on renal function when placed across renal ostia.

METHODS

A total of 140 consecutive patients, between August 2003 and April 2005, who underwent elective endovascular repair of an aortic aneurysm with a nitinol or stainless steel-based endograft with transrenal fixation were reviewed with a mean follow-up period of 5.5 months (range, 1-22 months). The main outcome variable was the percentage change in creatinine clearance (CrCl), which was determined before surgery and at the most recent follow-up. Multiple regression analysis was performed to analyze the contribution of various factors to any deterioration in renal function.

RESULTS

The 140 patients were predominantly male (86%), with a mean age of 75 years (range, 56-92) and a mean aneurysm diameter of 62 mm (range, 42-110 mm). The mean intraoperative contrast use was 67 mL (range, 45-160 mL), and after surgery these patients received a mean of 3 surveillance computed tomographic scans (range, 1-7). Nineteen cases (13.6%) required deliberate accessory renal artery coverage. CrCl did not change significantly after surgery; the mean change in CrCl at the end of follow-up was a 2.5% decrease. There was no difference in the reduction in CrCl between endograft types. Only 14.3% of patients experienced a greater than 20% decrease in CrCl. Multiple regression analysis failed to show a relationship between change in renal function and age, sex, aneurysm diameter, infrarenal neck dimensions, endograft type, coverage of accessory renal arteries, intraoperative contrast volume, preoperative CrCl, and postoperative computed tomographic scans. Length of follow-up was an independent predictor (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

Transrenal endograft fixation results in little deterioration in renal function during intermediate follow-up. The few patients who do experience a decline in renal function do so independently of any features related to the initial endovascular repair, and there is no difference in renal deterioration between endografts with nitinol and stainless steel transrenal bare metal stents.

Renal interventions after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair using an aortic endograft with suprarenal fixation

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine whether suprarenal fixation in endografts compromises renal artery (RA) flow and whether subsequent RA intervention is precluded by the stent struts.

METHODS

Prospectively acquired data from 104 patients with endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of an abdominal aortic aneurysm using the Zenith endograft (Cook, Inc., Bloomington, IN) were analyzed. The Zenith device uses a 26-mm, uncovered, barbed Z stent for suprarenal function.

RESULTS

No RA stenosis, occlusion, or infarction resulted from the suprarenal stent. In 3 of 104 (2.9%) patients, RA compromise (2 stenoses, 1 occlusion) was caused by impingement of graft material on the lowermost RA. The 2 RA stenoses were stented successfully at 1 and 7 months post-EVAR. Six of 104 (5.8%) patients developed late stenoses unrelated to the endograft: all were stented successfully from 19 to 36 months after EVAR. One patient with severe RA stenosis had balloon angioplasty pre-EVAR and then was stented electively 6 weeks post-EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that the suprarenal fixation of the Zenith aortic endograft does not cause RA stenosis, occlusion, or infarction, nor does it preclude post-EVAR renal artery intervention.

Does N-Acetylcysteine Prevent Contrast-Induced Nephropathy During Endovascular AAA Repair? A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To examine if N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduces the incidence of contrast nephropathy during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) as evidenced by changes in markers of renal function.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive men (mean age 72 years, range 65-79) undergoing EVAR were randomized to receive standard intravenous fluid hydration or standard fluid hydration and NAC (600 mg BID orally, 4 doses). Venous blood and urine were collected prior to the procedure and for 5 postoperative days and analyzed blindly for serum creatinine, urinary retinol-binding protein (RBP), and albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between the groups. No patient developed acute renal failure. In both groups, urinary RBP rose significantly from baseline (median 15 microg/mmol to peak 699 microg/mmol in controls versus 17 to 648 microg/mmol in the treatment group, p<0.003). There were similar significant rises in ACR (p<0.02). There was, however, no significant difference in the postoperative RBP or ACR between the groups at any time point.

CONCLUSION

EVAR causes significant acute renal injury in most patients. This was not attenuated by N-acetylcysteine. The causes of renal injury are probably multifactorial, the long-term clinical significance of which is unclear.

A comparison of renal function between open and endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with baseline chronic renal insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is rapidly becoming the predominant technique for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Results from current studies, however, are conflicting on the effect of EVAR on renal function compared with standard open repair. Furthermore, data for open repair in patients with baseline renal insufficiency suggests worse outcomes, including renal function. This analysis compared the effects of open repair vs EVAR on renal function in patients with baseline renal insufficiency.

METHODS

We reviewed our records for patients with preoperative chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine, 1.5 mg/dL) who underwent open repair or EVAR between 1999 and 2004. The same group of vascular surgeons at a single institution performed aneurysm repair on 98 patients: 46 open (37 men, 9 women) and 52 EVAR (50 men, 2 women). Preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were compared, as was the development of postoperative renal impairment (increase in serum creatinine >30%).

RESULTS

Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were not statistically different between the open and EVAR groups during any time period studied. Likewise when comparing the magnitude of change in serum creatinine in patients between the postoperative and follow-up times with preoperative values, no significant differences existed between the open and EVAR groups. When the change in serum creatinine over time within each group was compared, however, the open group had a significant increase in serum creatinine postoperatively (2.43 +/- 1.20 vs 2.04 +/- 0.64, P = .012), which returned to baseline during follow-up (1.96 +/- 0.94, P = .504). Although serum creatinine in the EVAR group increased compared with preoperative values of 2.04 +/- 0.55 (postoperative, 2.27 +/- 1.04; follow-up, 2.40 +/- 1.37), this failed to reach statistical significance for the postoperative (P = .092) or follow-up (P = .081) periods. A similar pattern was noted in creatinine clearance. Postoperative renal impairment was noted in 13 open (28%) and 15 EVAR patients (29%) and was not statistically different between groups. Overall, two patients (4.3%) from the open group and four (7.7%) from the EVAR group required hemodialysis; one in the EVAR group required permanent hemodialysis. This difference was not statistically significant (P = .681).

CONCLUSIONS

Open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with pre-existent renal insufficiency can be performed safely with preservation of renal function. In contrast to previous reports, no significant differences existed between open repair and EVAR in postoperative alterations in renal function. Although a significant increase in serum creatinine develops in patients with renal insufficiency postoperatively with open repair, this appears to be transient, and preoperative renal dysfunction alone should not exclude either approach. After EVAR, patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency continue to be at risk for progressive renal dysfunction, and protective measures should be taken to preserve renal function in this patient population.

Transrenal Fixation of Aortic Stent-Grafts: Short- to Midterm Effects on Renal Function—A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the short- to midterm effects of transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts on renal function in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A search of the PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases for English-language literature was performed. Studies with at least 10 patients were included for data analysis. Only studies on transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts that included follow-up results for renal function were included. A log-linear model was used for meta-analysis to compare transrenal fixation with infrarenal fixation.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Because two studies analyzed the same group of patients, one was excluded, for a total of 21 studies. Comparisons between transrenal fixation and infrarenal fixation were found in seven studies. For transrenal versus infrarenal fixation, the combined odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, and P value were found to be statistically significant with respect to postprocedural renal infarction only (combined odds ratio, 5.189; 95% confidence interval: 3.198, 8.420; P < .001). No significant difference was found between transrenal and infrarenal fixation with respect to renal dysfunction, renal artery occlusion, or endoleaks (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Transrenal fixation of aortic stent-grafts seems to be a relatively safe alternative compared with infrarenal fixation in terms of short- to midterm follow-up. Postprocedural renal infarction, however, was significantly higher for transrenal fixation.

Three-dimensional visualization of suprarenal aortic stent-grafts: evaluation of migration in midterm follow-up

PURPOSE

To investigate the midterm results of transrenal fixation of abdominal aortic stent-grafts with regard to device migration and encroachment of stent wires on the renal and visceral branches.

METHODS

Imaging data from 18 patients (15 men; mean age 75 years, range 63-84) undergoing transrenal stent-graft fixation for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) were included in the study. Computed tomographic angiographic data acquired within 1 week of stent-graft implantation were compared to the latest follow-up images. Postprocessing methods generated 3-dimensional (3D) maximum intensity projections (MIP) and virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) for evaluation of the relationship between suprarenal stents and aortic branches. Aortic neck angulation was measured in each patient for correlation with the incidence of stent migration.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 40 months. 3D image visualizations showed that the stent-graft moved caudally in all patients (range 2.6-14.2 mm), with migration (>10 mm) observed in 4 (22%) patients. Corresponding VIE images documented changes in stent wire encroachment on the aortic branch ostia in 11 patients, including the number and position of crossing stent wires. There was no close relationship between aortic neck angulation and stent migration.

CONCLUSION

The current study demonstrated that migration occurs at midterm follow-up in transrenally deployed stent-grafts. 3D images were valuable for the assessment of stent migration, as well as its relationship with aortic branch ostia. Long-term follow-up of transrenal fixation deserves to be investigated, especially after observing stent migration relative to aortic ostial encroachment.