Isolated hypoxic perfusion with mitomycin C in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy versus isolated upper abdominal perfusion for advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective cohort study on 454 patients

Purpose

The treatment of pancreatic carcinoma remains a challenge as prognosis is poor, even if confined to a single anatomical region. A regional treatment of pancreatic cancer with high drug concentrations at the tumor site may increase response behaviour. Intra-arterial administration of drugs generates homogenous drug distribution throughout the entire tumor volume.

Methods

We report on treatment outcome of 454 patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma (WHO stage III: 174 patients, WHO stage IV: 280 patients). Patients have been separated to two different treatment protocols. The first group (n = 233 patients) has been treated via angiographically placed celiac axis catheters. The second group (n = 221 patients) had upper abdominal perfusion (UAP) with stopflow balloon catheters in aorta and vena cava. Both groups have been treated with a combination of cisplatin, adriamycin and mitomycin.

Results

For stage III pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 8 and 12 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. For stage IV pancreatic cancer, median survival rates of 7 and 8.5 months were reached with IA and UAP treatment, respectively. Resolution of ascites has been reached in all cases by UAP treatment. Toxicity was generally mild, WHO grade I or II, toxicity grade III or IV was only noted in patients with severe systemic pretreatment. The techniques, survival data and detailed results are demonstrated.

Conclusions

Responsiveness of pancreatic cancer to regional chemotherapy is drug exposure dependent. The isolated perfusion procedure is superior to intra-arterial infusion in survival times.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00432-019-03019-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Challenges in chemotherapy delivery: comparison of standard chemotherapy delivery to locoregional vascular mass fluid transfer

Standard intravenous chemotherapy delivery to neoplasms relies on simple diffusion gradients from the intravascular to the interstitial space. Systemic perfusion creates untoward effects on normal tissue limiting both concentration and exposure times. Regional intra-arterial therapy is limited by drug recirculation and vascular isolation repeatability and does not address the interstitial microenvironment. Barriers to delivery relate to chaotic vascular architecture, heterogeneous fluid flux, increased interstitial and variable solid tumor pressure and ischemia. To address these difficulties, a delivery system was developed allowing mass fluid transfer of chemotherapeutic agents into the interstitium. This implantable, reusable system is comprised of multiple independently steerable balloons and catheters capable of controlling the locoregional hydraulic and oncotic forces across the vascular endothelium.

Regional intra-arterial vs. systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) versus systemic chemotherapy for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated by regional intra-arterial or systemic chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases, for all publications dated between 1960 and December 31, 2010. Data was independently extracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios and relative risks were pooled using either fixed- or random-effects models, depending on I(2) statistic and Q test assessments of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials comprised of 298 patients met the standards for inclusion in the meta-analysis, among 492 articles that were identified. Eight patients achieved complete remission (CR) with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC), whereas no patients achieved CR with systemic chemotherapy. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, patients receiving RIAC had superior partial remissions (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.65; 58.06% with RIAC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), clinical benefits (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.84, 2.97; 78.06% with RAIC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), total complication rates (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87; 49.03% with RIAC and 71.33% with systemic treatment), and hematological side effects (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91; 60.87% with RIAC and 85.71% with systemic treatment). The median survival time with RIAC (5-21 months) was longer than for systemic chemotherapy (2.7-14 months). Similarly, one year survival rates with RIAC (28.6%-41.2%) were higher than with systemic chemotherapy (0%-12.9%.).

CONCLUSION

Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy is more effective and has fewer complications than systemic chemotherapy for treating advanced pancreatic cancer.

Expanding surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer: the role of regional chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease that offers little chance of long-term survival for patients with unresectable tumors. Surgery remains the most effective means of attaining prolonged survival, yet its role remains limited. Regional chemotherapy has been described for patients with pancreatic cancer, including reports of objective tumor regression allowing for tumor resection in previously unresectable cases. However, comprehensive data have not been reviewed to date.

METHODS

A review of the literature from 1995 to 2010 was performed to analyze the results of regional chemotherapy administered to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Reports of individual cases, postoperative regional therapy, and treatment of mixed tumor types were excluded.

RESULTS

Twenty-one reports of 895 total patients with pancreatic cancer were reviewed. Greater than 95% of the patients had stage III or IV adenocarcinoma. Objective response rates ranged from nil to 58%, with associated median survivals of 4 to 22 months. Low-grade gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were not uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional chemotherapy can be administered safely to patients with pancreatic cancer but with unclear benefit. Advanced pancreatic tumors converted to resectable status by the use of regional chemotherapy may improve patient survival.

Complications and toxicity after abdominal and pelvic hypoxic stop-flow perfusion chemotherapy: incidence and assessment of risk factors

BACKGROUND

Controversial results regarding the efficacy and toxicity of hypoxic abdominal and pelvic stop-flow perfusion chemotherapy (SFP) have been reported in relatively small series. Hence, because adequate assessment of its benefit in large homogenous cohorts is missing, acceptable morbidity should initially be assured in a series of adequate size. Additionally, risk factors should be assessed for eventual patient selection.

METHODS

The morbidity of abdominal and pelvic SFP performed on a miscellaneous group of patients in our institute was analyzed and potential risk factors for adverse events were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy abdominal (n = 42) and pelvic (n = 28) SFP were performed on 55 patients. In total, 28 adverse effects were observed after 30% of the procedures. Severe (grade 3) adverse events were recorded only after 4% of the procedures, while treatment-related life-threatening events and deaths were not present. Abdominal procedures when compared with pelvic ones were associated with increased systemic toxicity (36 vs. 7%, p = 0.005). Advanced age, gender, prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, limited experience, repeated procedure, drug choice and omission of hemofiltration after SFP completion were not associated with statistically significant increase of procedures with overall or systemic adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present series, abdominal and pelvic SFP was associated with an acceptable morbidity, which was mostly mild or moderate. Abdominal procedures were associated with increased toxicity. This procedure seems to be repeatable and also well tolerated both by elderly patients and by patients who had undergone prior chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, while hemofiltration does not appear to decrease the incidence of systemic toxicity.

Hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II evaluation/trial

In the past decade, some authors have reported objective responses and prolonged median survival times using hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, these promising results have not been confirmed by others, making it difficult to define the effectiveness of this loco-regional chemotherapy. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the response rate, time to disease progression and overall survival following HAP treatment of 22 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic tumors. Within the period from 1999 to 2003, 22 patients with histological diagnosis of unresectable stage III/IV pancreatic cancer, not responsive to systemic chemotherapy, were treated with mitomycin C 30mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60mg/m(2) by HAP (stop flow technique). Immediately after perfusion, hemofiltration was performed to reduce systemic side toxic effects. Responses were assessed by CT-scan 30days from the end of treatment. Minor or partial responses were confirmed by a second CT-scan 4weeks later. Following 26 treatment cycles no death or technical complications were recorded; four patients (18.2%) achieved a partial response, 2 (9.1%) a minimal response and 13 (59.1%) stable disease. The remaining 3 patients (13.6%) showed progression of the disease. The median time to disease progression was 3 months (range 1-10). The median survival time from the start of regional chemotherapy was 6 months (range 1.9-16), with a 1-year survival rate of 9%. Our data show that HAP is a relatively effective second-line treatment for advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a low complication rate. We do not concur with the opinion of others that HAP is an inactive treatment approach. However, taking into account the invasiveness of this procedure, and associated morbidity and cost, HAP would not appear to be preferable to less invasive loco-regional chemotherapeutic alternatives.

Results of regional chemotherapy using the aortic stop-flow technique in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

PURPOSE

Systemic palliative chemotherapy provides only a disappointing response and almost no prolongation of the survival time in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Isolated perfusion may lead to a higher concentration of cytostatics within the target tissue, which can be associated with a high response rate and longer survival in addition to a low rate of side effects. The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of the aortic stop-flow technique using commercially available tools in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with either unresectable or metastasized pancreatic carcinoma (diagnosed by histologic investigation) were enrolled in the study. In total, a 20-min hypoxic perfusion of the isolated abdominal compartment with 20 mg/m2 of mitomycin C (Medac, Hamburg, Germany) was carried out 22 times. The cytostatic concentration was determined intrainterventionally within the systemic and regional compartment. The tumor response was assessed using computed tomography and a tumor marker (CA19-9) every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

While 12 patients underwent one cycle, in 5 patients two complete perfusions were performed. Mitomycin C concentration was 10-fold higher within the regional compared with the systemic compartment at its maximum. The area under the curve (AUC) was 4.02 times larger. The degree of toxicity was considerable: World Health Organization grade I/II in 8/17, III/IV in 9/17 cases. Three treatment-related deaths were documented. The objective response rate was 17.6% (3 of 17 cases; 1 complete remission [CR], 2 partial remissions [PR]). In 3 subjects, a stable disease (SD) and in 11 individuals tumor progression (PD) was registered. The median survival was 4.1 months.

CONCLUSION

The aortic stop-flow technique was associated with a high toxicity rate but no improvement in the tumor response and survival was seen in comparison to the systemic chemotherapy of the historical group. Despite detectable pharmacokinetic advantages, the aortic stop-flow technique is therefore not considered to be feasible for palliative chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma for routine use.

Bio-chemotherapeutic strategies and the (dis) utility of hypoxic perfusion of liver, abdomen and pelvis using balloon catheter techniques

AIMS

To review the development and current status of balloon catheter mediated hypoxic perfusion of abdomen, pelvis and liver for treatment of locally advanced malignancies. Within this context we focus on the addition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) to these minimal invasive perfusion procedures.

METHODS

A literature search on these topics was carried out in PubMed for indexed articles and in all issues of Regional Cancer Treatment. The findings were related to our own experiences.

RESULTS

Hypoxic abdominal (HAP) and hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP) using balloon catheters, are currently applied modalities for treatment of a wide variety of abdominal and pelvic tumours, yet scientific validation of these procedures is poor. Following the results of several Phase I-II trials, both treatments are associated with severe systemic toxicity, significant morbidity and even mortality. The degree of systemic leakage associated with these procedures prohibits addition of TNF. For leakage free liver perfusion surgery is still required, as with current balloon catheter techniques it is not possible to perform leakage free isolated hypoxic hepatic perfusion (IHHP), using either orthograde or retrograde hepatic flow. Experimental and clinical observations suggest that within any perfusion setting, the utilization of TNF is only indicated for treatment of highly vascularised tumours and not for treatment of colorectal tumours.

CONCLUSION

Balloon catheter technology in its present form does not provide adequate leakage control in any of these settings and is therefore associated with considerable toxicity. It is associated with poor response rates and cannot be considered in any setting as a standard of care.

Pharmacokinetics of the Antineoplastic Drug Mitomycin C in Regional Chemotherapy Using the Aortic Stop Flow Technique in Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

An isolated perfusion may lead to a higher concentration of cytostatics within the target tissue, which can be associated with a high response rate and longer survival in addition to a low rate of side effects in comparison with systemic palliative chemotherapy. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics of mitomycin C utilizing the aortic stop flow technique with commercially available tools in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with unresectable or metastasized pancreatic carcinoma (diagnosed by histological investigation) underwent a 20-min hypoxic perfusion of the isolated abdominal compartment with 20 mg/m2 mitomycin C (Mitomedac, medac, Hamburg, Germany) 22 times. Cytostatic concentration was determined intrainterventionally within the systemic and regional compartment.

RESULTS

The mitomycin C concentration was 10 times higher within the regional compared with the systemic compartment at its maximum. The area under the curve was 4.02 times greater. Toxicity was considerable, i.e. WHO grade I/II in 8 of 17 cases, and III/IV in 9 of 17 cases. Two treatment-related deaths were documented. The objective response rate was 17.6% (3 of 17 cases; 1 complete remission, 2 partial remissions). In 3 subjects, stable disease was registered, and in 11 individuals, tumor progression. The median survival was 4.1 months.

CONCLUSION

Though high concentrations of the cytostatic drug were achieved within the regional compartment, the aortic stop flow technique was associated with a high toxicity rate but no improvement of tumor response and survival in comparison with systemic chemotherapy. Despite its pharmacokinetic advantages, the aortic stop flow technique is currently not recommendable for routine use.

Balloon catheter hypoxic abdominal perfusion with Mitomycin C and Melphalan for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II trial

BACKGROUND

Developments in balloon catheter methodology have made hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) with anti-tumour agents possible with only minimal invasive surgery. The initial reports on this modality and celiac axis stop-flow infusion for treatment of pancreatic cancer were very promising in terms of tumour response, median survival and pain reduction. Recent reports, however, have not been able to confirm these results and some have disputed the efficacy of these currently still applied treatment modalities.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma were included in a phase I-II trial of HAP with MMC and Melphalan followed by celiac axis infusion (CAI) with the same agents six weeks later. Tumour response was assessed by abdominal-CT and by determining tumour markers. Effect on pain reduction was assessed by evaluation of pain registration forms.

RESULTS

HAP resulted in augmented regional drug concentrations. One patient died after CAI due to acute mesenterial ischaemia. One agent-toxicity related death was observed in the phase-I study. Significant hematological toxicity was observed after HAP and CAI at MTD. No patients were considered resectable after treatment. Median survival after HAP was 6 months (range 1-29). Pain reduction was experienced by only 5/18 patients and was short-lived.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to earlier reports HAP and CAI with MMC and Melphalan did not demonstrate any benefit in terms of tumour response, median survival and pain reduction, compared to less invasive treatment options. As this treatment was associated with significant toxic side-effects and even one procedure related death, we do not consider this a therapeutic option in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Balloon catheter hypoxic abdominal and pelvic perfusion with tumour necrosis factor-alpha, Melphalan and Mitomycin C: a pharmacokinetic study in pigs

BACKGROUND

Addition of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF) to hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) and hypoxic pelvic perfusion (HPP) with chemotherapeutic agents for treatment of un-resectable malignancies may lead to similar enhanced anti-tumour effects as are observed when TNF is added to isolated limb perfusions (ILP) with Melphalan. Here, we validate the methodology of HAP and HPP using balloon catheter techniques, and investigate the distribution of TNF, Melphalan and Mitomycin C (MMC) over the regional and systemic blood compartments when applying these techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twelve pigs underwent HAP or HPP with TNF, Melphalan and MMC for 20 min. Throughout and after the procedures blood samples were obtained from hepatic, portal and systemic blood compartments and plasma concentrations of perfused agents were determined.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that HAP and HPP result in temporary loco-regional concentration advantages of all perfused agents, although from start of perfusion significant systemic leakage occurred.

CONCLUSION

On basis of these results it seems that the advantage in terms of regional plasma concentration of TNF may be insufficient for TNF-mediated effects to occur, making future addition of this cytokine to these procedures in the clinical setting questionable. The observed regional concentration advantages of MMC and Melphalan, however, warrant further studies on clinical application of these agents in both settings.

Hemodynamic variations during thoracic and abdominal stop-flow regional chemotherapy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to study hemodynamic modifications during thoracic and abdominal stop-flow regional chemotherapy and to evaluate the need for routine hemodynamic monitoring during such kind of procedures.

METHODS

Thirty patients, aged 17-67 years, ASA physical status II-III, scheduled for thoracic (group A, n = 15), and abdominal (group B, n = 15) stop-flow regional chemotherapy were enrolled. Heart rate (HR), electrocardiogram lead I and V(5), end tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO(2)), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), stroke index (SI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), left cardiac work (LCW), right cardiac work (RCW), left cardiac work index (LCWI), right cardiac work index (RCWI), cardiac index (CI), and body O(2) consumption (VO(2)) were recorded.

RESULTS

After aortic and inferior vena cava endovascular occlusion (T(1)), a significant reduction of CO and SV, associated with an increase of CVP, MAP, PAPM and PCWP were observed. A concomitant reduction of CI and increase of SVR and PVR were registered. The VO(2) was significantly reduced compared to basal values in both groups. After deflating aortic and vena cava balloons (T(2)), CO, SV and CI increased with respect to basal value p < 0.05) whereas MAP, CVP, PAPM, PCWP and calculated parameters (SVR, PVR) showed a significant reduction compared to T(1). The oxygen consumption was significantly higher than that of basal values p < 0.05. After hemofiltration (T(3)), all hemodynamic variables were comparable with the basal values. Modifications of direct and calculated parameters, during the stop-flow period, showed a similar trend in both study groups, without any statistically significant difference. No ST modifications at ECG were noted during all perioperative period.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study have confirmed in both groups, the safety of stop-flow regional chemotherapy procedure, despite endovascular occlusion of the aorta and inferior cava vein. The hemodynamic and oxygenation changes are reversible and did not produce any ST modifications at ECG during all perioperative period. Routine pulmonary artery catheterization is thus unnecessary, except in high cardiac risk patients.

Stop-flow technique for loco-regional delivery of antiblastic agents: literature review and personal experience

AIMS

The therapeutic approach for primary or recurrent advanced solid tumours, particularly when unresectable, is still one of the main medical challenges in the management of cancer patients. The stop-flow (SF) technique has been recently proposed as a semi-invasive drug delivery system based on the blood supply blockage of the tumour-bearing area. Here, we discuss the principles underlying the SF technique as well as the worldwide experience published so far. We also report on the results of our pilot study on pelvic and limb SF perfusion.

METHODS

We reviewed the worldwide experience on SF as reported by the literature published on PubMed from 1990 through 2001. In our series, we treated 20 patients affected with locally advanced melanoma, soft tissue sarcoma or colorectal cancer.

RESULTS

This therapeutic modality - at least for some tumours - can achieve encouraging results in terms of clinical response even after conventional therapies have failed. Moreover, as a safe and relatively simple procedure, SF can be applied to patients for whom traditional treatments (i.e. surgery, systemic chemotherapy) are contraindicated because of poor general conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, the SF technique should be considered an investigational approach to locally advanced cancers. The encouraging results obtained with this procedure should be validated by large phase III trials.

Regional chemotherapy

Regional chemotherapy is an interesting treatment option in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer but cannot be considered standard treatment, and it should not be performed outside controlled clinical trials. The real value of regional chemotherapy must be evaluated in larger, randomized trials. New drug combinations may reduce the observed side effects and improve tumor response. Gene therapy with p53 and K-ras modulated herpesviruses may become a palliative treatment option and can be administered easily by regional chemotherapy techniques [23].

Regional chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer--is it relevant?

The treatment of pancreatic cancer is still problematic for physicians. Only 15% of patients present with resectable tumours, and systemic chemotherapy is of limited effectiveness. In order to achieve higher local drug concentrations in the tumour without causing the side-effects of a comparable level of systemic treatment, regional chemotherapy has been introduced as an alternative treatment. Several techniques have been developed over recent years, these include: celiac axis infusion (CAI), CAI with microspheres or haemofiltration, aortic stop flow (ASF) and isolated hypoxic perfusion (IHP). Whilst several authors have reported improved response rates and a prolongation of median survival time, these results have not been confirmed by others. In addition, the incidence of side-effects and the rate of technical complications have been reported to be high during regional chemotherapy. Except for a single trial containing 14 patients, no randomised trial comparing systemic and regional chemotherapy has been conducted. For these reasons, none of the reported treatment regimens can be considered to be standard treatment and in order to evaluate, if regional chemotherapy is indeed superior to systemic chemotherapy, randomised trials must be conducted.