International study on the prevalence of malnutrition in centralized care for colorectal cancer patients

Objectives

Patients with different diseases may show signs of malnutrition both before and during the hospital stay. The presence of malnutrition may impact the recovery and length of stay and consequently the costs. Early identification of malnutrition is thus a critical factor. The objective of this multicenter study is to determine the prevalence of malnutrition in colorectal cancer centers. Another objective is to investigate possible consequences, such as complications or length of stay. In addition, the study aims to demonstrate the relevance of nutrition management in colorectal cancer centers. At the same time, relevant requirements clearly demanded by the Certification Commission for Certified Colorectal Cancer Centers are met through implementation of the study.

Methods

Between 2019 and 2021, patients in colorectal cancer centers were examined in the preoperative phase. In addition to questions about patients' state of health and nutrition, the validated screening forms-Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) and Nutritional Risk Screening Tool 2002 (NRS 2002)-were used to assess malnutrition. The data were processed by univariate analysis.

Results

In total, data records of 3,102 patients were evaluated. The mean age of the participants was 68.5 ± 11.9 years, and their average body mass index (BMI) was 26.8 ± 5.3 kg/m2. The SGA questionnaire indicated that 23 % of the participants suffered from malnutrition and 38 % were at risk of malnutrition (NRS≥3). Malnutrition was found more frequently in patients with colorectal carcinomas than in patients with rectal carcinomas (53.1 vs. 32.1 %). The length of stay in hospital and the rate of complications were significantly higher when malnutrition was identified.

Conclusions

Approximately one in three to four patients with a colorectal carcinoma has an increased risk of malnutrition. The two screening methods calculated a different prevalence (23 and 38 %). Any malnutrition that is present demonstrably has a significant impact both on the rate of complications and the length of stay and may therefore have a decisive influence on the costs. The results of this multicenter study underscore the need for systematic screening for malnutrition and at the same time should increase clinics awareness of the importance of establishing a nutrition management policy.

Prehabilitation in elective surgical interventions - what must the general and abdominal surgeon know

Objectives

For years, many efforts have been invested to prepare patients, in particular, those with reduced physical and psychic status, much better to provide and finally achieve better outocme if there is time available to provide several beneficial measures.

Methods

Therefore, the objective was to illustrate the concept and various single elements of a complex prehabilitation concept based on (i) selective references from the medical literature and (ii) own clinical experiences from clinical practice in general and abdominal surgery.

Results

Prehabiliation can be considered the solution of the efforts to improve preoperative status for patients in a disadvantageous status for almost all types of surgery and all other operative and/or interventional procedures. It is the targeted process to improve individual functionality and organ function before a planned (elective) surgical intervention; P. comprises basically nutritional, physical and psychological measures; P. focusses especially onto the elderly, frail and malnourished patients before a planned surgical intervention; the overall aim is to significantly improve final outcome characterized by shorter length of stay, lower complication rate and mortality as well as cost efficiency; P. is especially important in cancer surgery, in which the beneficial effects can be particularly implemented; P. programs and/or "Standard Operating Protocols" (SOP) may help to establish and materialize its single aspects and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). There is still further potential to reliably establish and to utilize the options of prehabilitation measures as listed above.

Conclusions

Prehabiliation is an indispensable aspect in today's preparation for elective surgery, which needs to become obligatory part of the preparation measures to planned surgical interventions, which can further contribute to a better final outcome and ERAS as well as, in addtion, needs to be further developed and accomplished.

Multivisceral resection of advanced colon and rectal cancer: a prospective multicenter observational study with propensity score analysis of the morbidity, mortality, and survival

Objectives

In the surgical treatment of colorectal carcinoma (CRC), 1 in 10 patients has a peritumorous adhesion or tumor infiltration in the adjacent tissue or organs. Accordingly, multivisceral resection (MVR) must be performed in these patients. This prospective multicenter observational study aimed to analyze the possible differences between non-multivisceral resection (nMVR) and MVR in terms of early postoperative and long-term oncological treatment outcomes. We also aimed to determine the factors influencing overall survival.

Methods

The data of 25,321 patients from 364 hospitals who had undergone surgery for CRC (the Union for International Cancer Control stages I-III) during a defined period were evaluated. MVR was defined as (partial) resection of the tumor-bearing organ along with resection of the adherent and adjacent organs or tissues. In addition to the patients' personal, diagnosis (tumor findings), and therapy data, demographic data were also recorded and the early postoperative outcome was determined. Furthermore, the long-term survival of each patient was investigated, and a "matched-pair" analysis was performed.

Results

From 2008 to 2015, the MVR rates were 9.9 % (n=1,551) for colon cancer (colon CA) and 10.6 % (n=1,027) for rectal cancer (rectal CA). CRC was more common in men (colon CA: 53.4 %; rectal CA: 62.0 %) than in women; all MVR groups had high proportions of women (53.6 % vs. 55.2 %; pairs of values in previously mentioned order). Resection of another organ frequently occurred (75.6 % vs. 63.7 %). The MVR group had a high prevalence of intraoperative (5.8 %; 12.1 %) and postoperative surgical complications (30.8 % vs. 36.4 %; each p<0.001). Wound infections (colon CA: 7.1 %) and anastomotic insufficiencies (rectal CA: 8.3 %) frequently occurred after MVR. The morbidity rates of the MVR groups were also determined (43.7 % vs. 47.2 %). The hospital mortality rates were 4.9 % in the colon CA-related MVR group and 3.8 % in the rectal CA-related MVR group and were significantly increased compared with those of the nMVR group (both p<0.001). Results of the matched-pair analysis showed that the morbidity rates in both MVR groups (colon CA: 42.9 % vs. 34.3 %; rectal CA: 46.3 % vs. 37.2 %; each p<0.001) were significantly increased. The hospital lethality rate tended to increase in the colon CA-related MVR group (4.8 % vs. 3.7 %; p=0.084), while it significantly increased in the rectal CA-related MVR group (3.4 % vs. 3.0 %; p=0.005). Moreover, the 5-year (yr) overall survival rates were 53.9 % (nMVR: 69.5 %; p<0.001) in the colon CA group and 56.8 % (nMVR: 69.4 %; p<0.001) in the rectal CA group. Comparison of individual T stages (MVR vs. nMVR) showed no significant differences in the survival outcomes (p<0.05); however, according to the matched-pair analysis, a significant difference was observed in the survival outcomes of those with pT4 colon CA (40.6 % vs. 50.2 %; p=0.017). By contrast, the local recurrence rates after MVR were not significantly different (7.0 % vs. 5.8 %; both p>0.05). The risk factors common to both tumor types were advanced age (>79 yr), pT stage, sex, and morbidity (each hazard ratio: >1; p<0.05).

Conclusions

MVR allows curation by R0 resection with adequate long-term survival. For colon or rectal CA, MVR tended to be associated with reduced 5-year overall survival rates (significant only for pT4 colon CA based on the MPA results), as well as, with a significant increase in morbidity rates in both tumor entities. In the overall data, MVR was associated with significant increases in hospital lethality rates, as indicated by the matched-pair analysis (significant only for rectal CA).

Does intestinal anastomosis in resection of colon cancer have a significant impact onto early postoperative outcome and long-term survival?

Objectives

To investigate the influence of anastomosis on the early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes of patients with primary colon carcinoma (CA).

Methods

All consecutive patients with the histologically diagnosed primary colon CA (design, prospective multicenter observational study) were registered with regard to patient-, diagnostic-, tumor (Tu) finding-, and treatment-related aspects using a computer-based registry with 60 items to characterize early postoperative and long-term oncological outcome.

Results

Basic data: From 2010 to 2016, data from a total of 14,466 patients were documented (mean age, 72.8 [range, 22-96] years; sex ratio, m:f=7,696:6,770). - 717/14,466 patients (4.96 %) were included in a matched-pair analysis. The majority of these patients underwent elective surgery (n=12,620 patients; 87.2 %) regardless of whether a bowel anastomosis or an ostomy was created. In emergency surgery, a bowel anastomosis was possible in a large proportion (n=1,332 patients [72.1 %]). In contrast, in 514 patients (27.9 %) who underwent emergency surgery, an ostomy was created. Interestingly, ostomy had to be created even less frequently in patients who had undergone planned surgery (n=366 [2.5 %]). - Early postoperative outcome: Cases of postoperative mortality were mainly due to general complications. Especially among the patients treated in an emergency situation without intestinal anastomosis, a high proportion died of their pre-existing condition (17.0 %). Patients who underwent ostomy creation or emergency surgery had a worse risk profile (incl. arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and secondary cardiac or renal diseases) which led to the decision to operate without anastomosis. Furthermore, data show no matter which technique had been used, patients that had undergone surgical intervention without anastomosis were more likely to develop complications. - Long-term oncosurgical outcome: The most important factors influencing long-term survival were age, resection status, and tumor stage (according to TNM and UICC). The more advanced the tumor growth, the lower the long-term survival. Patients categorized with the same tumor stage, age, and risk factors had a better chance of survival, if they underwent elective surgical intervention and with intestinal anastomosis. Interestingly, the multivariable analysis showed that older patients and such with distant metastasis benefit from a discontinuity resection.

Conclusions

The association of intraoperative and postoperative complications with increased postoperative mortality, as well as preexisting risk factors and perioperative complications is in line with findings of current studies. Furthermore, current studies also agree that older patients and such with reduced general condition benefit from discontinuity resection.

Dissecting the genetic heterogeneity of gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is clinically heterogenous according to location (cardia/non-cardia) and histopathology (diffuse/intestinal). We aimed to characterize the genetic risk architecture of GC according to its subtypes. Another aim was to examine whether cardia GC and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and its precursor lesion Barrett's oesophagus (BO), which are all located at the gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ), share polygenic risk architecture.

METHODS

We did a meta-analysis of ten European genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of GC and its subtypes. All patients had a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma. For the identification of risk genes among GWAS loci we did a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) study from gastric corpus and antrum mucosa. To test whether cardia GC and OAC/BO share genetic aetiology we also used a European GWAS sample with OAC/BO.

FINDINGS

Our GWAS consisting of 5816 patients and 10,999 controls highlights the genetic heterogeneity of GC according to its subtypes. We newly identified two and replicated five GC risk loci, all of them with subtype-specific association. The gastric transcriptome data consisting of 361 corpus and 342 antrum mucosa samples revealed that an upregulated expression of MUC1, ANKRD50, PTGER4, and PSCA are plausible GC-pathomechanisms at four GWAS loci. At another risk locus, we found that the blood-group 0 exerts protective effects for non-cardia and diffuse GC, while blood-group A increases risk for both GC subtypes. Furthermore, our GWAS on cardia GC and OAC/BO (10,279 patients, 16,527 controls) showed that both cancer entities share genetic aetiology at the polygenic level and identified two new risk loci on the single-marker level.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings show that the pathophysiology of GC is genetically heterogenous according to location and histopathology. Moreover, our findings point to common molecular mechanisms underlying cardia GC and OAC/BO.

FUNDING

German Research Foundation (DFG).

Impact of a digital surgical workflow including Digital Device Briefing Tool on morbidity and mortality in a patient population undergoing primary stapled colorectal anastomosis for benign or malignant colorectal disease: protocol for a multicentre prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

With growing emphasis on surgical safety, it appears fundamental to assess the safety of colorectal resection involving primary stapled anastomosis. Surgical stapling devices can considerably foster patient safety in colorectal surgery, but their misuse or malfunction encompass a unique risk of postoperative complications. The Digital Device Briefing Tool (DDBT) is a digital cognitive aid developed to enhance safe use of the Ethicon circular stapling device during colorectal resection. The purpose of this study is to evaluate how a digital operative workflow, including DDBT, compared with routine surgical care, affects morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing left-sided colorectal resection with primary stapled colorectal anastomosis for colorectal cancer or benign disease.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre, prospective cohort study will be conducted at five certified academic colorectal centres in Germany. It compares a non-digital with a Johnson & Johnson digital solution (Surgical Process Institute Deutschland (SPI))-guided operative workflow in patients undergoing left hemicolectomy, sigmoidectomy, anterior rectal resection and Hartmann reversal procedure. The sample size is set at 528 cases in total, divided into 3 groups (a non-digital and two SPI-guided workflow cohorts, with and without DDBT) in a ratio of 1:1:1, with 176 patients each. The primary endpoint is a composite outcome comprising the overall rate of surgical complications, including death, during hospitalisation and within the first 30 days after colorectal resection. Secondary endpoints include operating time, length of hospital stay and 30-day hospital readmission rate.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be performed in line with the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethics committee of the Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Germany, approved the study (No: 22-0277-EA2/060/22). Study Investigators will obtain written informed consent from each patient before a patient may participate in this study. The study results will be submitted to an international peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00029682.

Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

In a post hoc analysis of the MAGIC trial, patients with curatively resected gastric cancer (GC) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (MMRd) had better median overall survival (OS) when treated with surgery alone but worse median OS when treated with additional chemotherapy. Further data are required to corroborate these findings.

METHODS

Between April 2013 and December 2018, 458 patients with curatively resected GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction Siewert type II and III, were identified in the German centers of the staR consortium. Tumor sections were assessed for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry. The association between MMR status and survival was assessed. Similar studies published up to January 2021 were then identified in a MEDLINE search for a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

MMR-status and survival data were available for 223 patients (median age 66 years, 62.8% male), 23 patients were MMRd (10.3%). After matching for baseline clinical characteristics, median OS was not reached in any subgroup. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd and MMRp had a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.13-3.37, P = 0.63) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.66-3.13, P = 0.36), respectively. The meta-analysis included pooled data from 385 patients. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd had an improved OS with a HR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas those with MMRp had a HR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.89-1.58, P = 0.26).

CONCLUSION

Our data support a positive prognostic effect for MMRd in GC patients treated with surgery only and a differentially negative prognostic effect in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy. MMR status determined by preoperative biopsies may be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy in curatively resectable GC.

Different Prevalence of Alarm, Dyspeptic and Reflux Symptoms in Patients with Cardia and Non-cardia Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Symptoms of patients with gastric cancer (GC) are often unspecific and differences in symptoms between patients with cardia and non-cardia GC have been poorly investigated. We aimed to characterize symptoms of patients with cardia and non-cardia GC.

METHODS

Patients with cardia (Siewert type II and III) and non-cardia GC were recruited in the German multicenter cohort of the Gastric Cancer Research (staR) study between 2013 and 2017. Alarm, dyspeptic and reflux symptoms at the time of presentation were documented using a self-administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

A completed self-administered questionnaire was available for 568/759 recruited patients (132 cardia GC, 436 non-cardia GC, male 61%, mean age 64 years). Dyspeptic symptoms were more common in patients with non-cardia GC (69.0 vs. 54.5%, p=0.0024). Cardia GC patients reported more frequently alarm symptoms (69.7 vs. 44.7%, p<0.0001), and were more likely to have Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage III-IV (54.1vs. 38.9%, p=0.0034). Especially, dysphagia and weight loss were more common in patients with cardia GC (49.2 vs. 6.4 %, p<0.0001 and 37.1 vs. 25.7%, p=0.02, respectively). No differences between the two groups were observed with respect to reflux symptoms. Patients with alarm symptoms were more likely to have UICC stage III-IV at presentation (69.4 vs. 42.9%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical practice the symptom pattern at presentation may serve as a hint for tumor localization. Despite the fact that they are common in the general population, dyspeptic symptoms offer a chance for earlier GC detection. Thus, in patients with dyspeptic symptoms who fail empiric approaches, endoscopy should not be delayed.

Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2)

Purpose

To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer.

Methods

This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2‑year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2‑year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesis = H₀), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H₀ was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable.

Results

Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55–87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36–71%); H₀ was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (p = 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30–1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25–1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13–1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17–1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (p = 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (p = 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.044).

Conclusion

Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.

Acceptance of preventive colonoscopy in rural areas in Germany

e16143

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common types of cancer in Germany. Colonoscopy is certainly one of the most efficient diagnostic methods in preventing and early detection of colorectal cancer. Nevertheless, acceptance of colonoscopy as a useful screening method among the population in Germany is moderate, with around 22% of those entitled to claim. Methods: In order to better assess the reasons for the low level of acceptance, patients who presented themselves from March 2016 to June 2017 in the General Surgery Clinic of the Johanniter Hospital Stendal were randomly selected and interviewed using a questionnaire. These randomized patients did not suffer from colorectal cancer. The questionnaire asked whether the patients had participated in Colon Cancer Screening and if not for what reasons. Respondents were asked to choose among 8 preselected reasons or give their own. The options for not having participated in colorectal cancer screening were: lack of knowledge about the offer of colorectal cancer screening, fear of the examination, fear of cancer as an outcome, lack of time for the examination, didn't get an appointment for the exam, place of examination is too far away, excessive travel costs, examination makes no sense, and other (free text entry). Results: A total of 238 questionnaires were completed, 235 of which could be evaluated with regard to gender and age. The proportion between women and men was balanced (m 123, w 112). Surprisingly, contrary to expectations, significantly more respondents participated in colorectal cancer screening than not. There were no differences between females and males. The participation rate in colorectal cancer screening was 71%, which was significantly higher than expected. A significantly lower rate was found in respondents ages between 55 to 60 years old, with 41% of men and 67% of women having participated in a colorectal screening. Asked specifically about the reasons why they did not take advantage of the preventive medical check-up, the men of the affected age group (55-60 years) gave: fear of the examination, fear of cancer as an outcome, and examination makes no sense. Conclusions: The results underline the importance of determining why the acceptance of colorectal cancer screening has not yet reached the desired level. Considering and discussing these three main reasons show that there are opportunities to continuously increase awareness of the importance of participation rates in colonoscopy as a screening method for colorectal cancer through target public education.

Relationship between nutritional status and length of hospital stay in oncological surgery

e13591

Background: In Germany, a serious illness is the main cause of malnutrition. Various studies have already shown that the length of time in hospital for various diseases and operations in malnourished patients increases. This leads to a deterioration in the quality of life of the patient and results in considerable costs for the health care system. Methods: In order to investigate the relationship between nutritional status and length of hospital stay, a patient group of 363 patients who had a tumor with the primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract was first identified. All patients had an NRS score of 3 or greater and a meaningful laboratory with regard to protein and albumin levels and / or results of a bioelectrical impedance analysis. The average length of stay for these patients was determined depending on the various parameters. Results: The present study shows that malnourished patients have to stay in the hospital for between 2 and 11.1 days longer. When evaluating the NRS score, the protein and albumin level as well as the BCM and the ECM / BCM index, a longer hospital stay of malnourished patients compared to those who were not malnourished was demonstrated. The BMI is an insufficient parameter to describe the nutritional status. An extension of the length of hospital stay cannot be demonstrated only on the basis of the BMI. Conclusions: Since an inadequate nutritional status obviously affects the length of hospital stay in oncological patients, they should be examined early for malnutrition. The length of stay can be shortened through nutritional therapy measures, which also leads to a significant reduction in costs.

Gastric cancer in autoimmune gastritis: A case-control study from the German centers of the staR project on gastric cancer research

Objectives

Patients with autoimmune gastritis (AIG) are reported to have an increased risk of developing gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we assess the characteristics and outcomes of GC patients with AIG in a multicenter case-control study.

Methods

Between April 2013 and May 2017, patients with GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) Siewert type II and III, were recruited. Patients with histological characteristics of AIG were identified and matched in a 1:2 fashion for age and gender to GC patients with no AIG. Presenting symptoms were documented using a self-administered questionnaire.

Results

Histological assessment of gastric mucosa was available for 572/759 GC patients. Overall, 28 (4.9%) of GC patients had AIG (67 ± 9 years, female-to-male ratio 1.3:1). In patients with AIG, GC was more likely to be localized in the proximal (i.e. EGJ, fundus, corpus) stomach (odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0–7.1). In GC patients with AIG, pernicious anemia was the leading clinical sign (OR 22.0, 95% CI 2.6–187.2), and the most common indication for esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OR 29.0, 95% CI 7.2–116.4). GC patients with AIG were more likely to present without distant metastases (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.3–28.8) and to be treated with curative intention (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.0–9.0). The five-year survival rates with 95% CI in GC patients with and with no AIG were 84.7% (83.8–85.6) and 53.5% (50.9–56.1), respectively (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.75, p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Pernicious anemia leads to earlier diagnosis of GC in AIG patients and contributes significantly to a better clinical outcome.

Evidence for PTGER4, PSCA, and MBOAT7 as risk genes for gastric cancer on the genome and transcriptome level

Genetic associations between variants on chromosome 5p13 and 8q24 and gastric cancer (GC) have been previously reported in the Asian population. We aimed to replicate these findings and to characterize the associations at the genome and transcriptome level. We performed a fine‐mapping association study in 1926 GC patients and 2012 controls of European descent using high dense SNP marker sets on both chromosomal regions. Next, we performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses using gastric transcriptome data from 143 individuals focusing on the GC associated variants. On chromosome 5p13 the strongest association was observed at rs6872282 (P = 2.53 × 10⁻⁰⁴) and on chromosome 8q24 at rs2585176 (P = 1.09 × 10⁻⁰⁹). On chromosome 5p13 we found cis‐eQTL effects with an upregulation of PTGER4 expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 9.27 × 10⁻¹¹). On chromosome 8q24 we observed cis‐eQTL effects with an upregulation of PSCA expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 2.17 × 10⁻⁴⁷). In addition, we found trans‐eQTL effects for the same variants on 8q24 with a downregulation of MBOAT7 expression in GC risk allele carrier (P = 3.11 × 10⁻⁰⁹). In summary, we confirmed and refined the previously reported GC associations at both chromosomal regions. Our data point to shared etiological factors between Asians and Europeans. Furthermore, our data imply an upregulated expression of PTGER4 and PSCA as well as a downregulated expression of MBOAT7 in gastric tissue as risk‐conferring GC pathomechanisms.

The characteristics of c-MET and HER2 expression in gastric carcinoma and its correlation with clinical-pathological parameters

e15566

Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether overexpression of c-MET or HER2 had an effect on the clinical-pathological parameters and / or the prognosis of gastric carcinoma, as well as a direct correlation among those parameters. Methods: 134 gastric resectates were archived between 2007-2012 and retrospectively examined for c-MET and HER2 expression via immunohistochemistry (IHC). The HER2 status IHC2 + was additionally verified by means of Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH). Statistical data analysis was performed on the basis of the parameters acquired in the prospective multicentre observation study QCGC'07 / 09. Results: A total of 71 patients (53%) were found to express c-MET low and 63 patients (47%) expressed c-MET high, 122 patients (91%) were found to be HER2 negative and 12 persons (9%) were HER2 positive. C-MET high was significantly more pronounced in the Lauren intestinal type (63.8%, p = 0.001) and moderately to poorly differentiated tumour tissue (G2 50.9%, G3 43.9%, p = 0.038) as well es tissue with lymph vessel infiltration (L1 59.1%, p = 0.039). HER2 showed no significant effect on the clinical-pathological parameters. The median overall survival was shown to be shortened for the c-MET high-expressing (c-MET low 56 months, SD: ± 24.67; 95% CI: 7.65-104.36 vs. c-MET high 32 months, SD: ± (median-OS HER2 negative 38 months, SD: ± 14.11, 95% CI: 10.35-65, p = 0.839), and HER2 negative, 65, median-OS HER2 positive not reached, p = 0.305) patients. 8/134 resectates (5.97%, p = 0.135) were high and positive in both expression patterns, showing no significant difference to the OS (p = 0.393). Conclusions: In our studies, c-MET high or HER2 negative expression was associated with a poorer OS. However, no direct correlation between HER2 and c-MET could be demonstrated

The risk of malnutrition in patients with rectal carcinoma: An analysis of 9789 patients

e15059

Background: The problem of under-nutrition and lack of nutrition is increasingly placed in the focus of operational discipline. Many of them are deficient in malnutrition before being hospitalized. In surgical therapy, the prevention of postoperative complications is of utmost importance. Due to a preoperative condition of malnutrition, the complication rate may increase and thus the associated increased treatment therapy costs per patient. The consequence, of course, is also a diminished postoperative treatment quality of the treating clinic. Methods: Prospective Multicentre Observational Study: "Quality Assurance Study of Rectal Cancer from 2010-2014 of the" An-Institute for Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine "at the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, was screened for Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) Kondrup J et al Results: 9789 primary data records from 2010 to 2014 were included. With the help of the NRS screening, a total score in the form of a scoring system is possible. The sum of 3 points or more identifies a patient with a food-related risk and should be a cause for further diagnosis and therapy. The median of all rectal carcinoma patients was NRS = 3. 53.9% of the patients had an NRS score of > = 3. In morbidity, the complications in colorectal cancer patients with NRS > = 3 points are significantly increased. Also in the case of general complications (such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, etc.) the rate increases with a larger NRS score. Conclusions: If the risk of malnutrition is small in patients with a colon carcinoma, the morbidity is low.

The risk of malnutrition in patients with a colon carcinoma: An analysis of 13239 patients

e15057

Background: The problem of under-nutrition and lack of nutrition is increasingly placed in the focus of operational discipline. Many of them are deficient in malnutrition before being hospitalized. In surgical therapy, the prevention of postoperative complications is of utmost importance. Due to a preoperative condition of malnutrition, the complication rate may increase and thus the associated increased treatment therapy costs per patient. The consequence, of course, is also a diminished postoperative treatment quality of the treating clinic. Methods: Prospective Multicentric Observational Study: "Quality Assurance Study Colorectal Cancer from 2010-2014 of the" An Institute for Quality Assurance in Operational Medicine "at the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg. The screening for lack of nutrition was carried out with the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS 2002) Kondrup J et al .. Results: 13239 primary data records from 2010 to 2014 were included. With the help of the NRS screening, a total score in the form of a scoring system is possible. The sum of 3 points or more identifies a patient with a nutrition-related risk and should be a cause for further diagnosis and therapy. The median of all colorectal cancer patients was NRS = 3. 65.4% of the patients had an NRS score of > = 3. In morbidity, the complications in colorectal cancer patients with NRS > = 3 points are significantly increased. Also in the case of general complications (such as pneumonia, urinary tract infection, etc.) the rate increases with a larger NRS score. Conclusions: If the risk of malnutrition is small in patients with a colon carcinoma, the morbidity is low.

Adjuvant treatment for resected rectal cancer: impact of standard and intensified postoperative chemotherapy on disease-free survival in patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiation-a propensity score-matched analysis of an observational database

AIMS

Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected rectal cancer is widely used. However, studies on adjuvant treatment following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) have yielded conflicting results. Recent studies have focused on adding oxaliplatin to both preoperative and postoperative therapy, making it difficult to assess the impact of adjuvant oxaliplatin alone. This study was aimed at determining the impact of (i) any adjuvant treatment and (ii) oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant treatment on disease-free survival in CRT-pretreated, R0-resected rectal cancer patients.

METHOD

Patients undergoing R0 TME following 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-only-based CRT between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2010, were selected from a nationwide registry. After propensity score matching (PSM), comparison of disease-free survival (DFS) using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test was performed in (i) patients receiving no vs. any adjuvant treatment and (ii) patients treated with adjuvant 5FU/capecitabine without vs. with oxaliplatin.

RESULTS

Out of 1497 patients, 520 matched pairs were generated for analysis of no vs. any adjuvant treatment. Mean DFS was significantly prolonged with adjuvant treatment (81.8 ± 2.06 vs. 70.1 ± 3.02 months, p < 0.001). One hundred forty-eight matched pairs were available for analysis of adjuvant therapy with or without oxaliplatin, showing no improvement in DFS in patients receiving oxaliplatin (76.9 ± 4.12 vs. 79.3 ± 4.44 months, p = 0.254). Local recurrence rate was not significantly different between groups in either analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT and TME surgery under routine conditions, adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved DFS. No benefit was observed for the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting.

[Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery]

BACKGROUND

The oncological outcome of patients with rectal cancer has improved considerably over the past few decades. This is mainly due to the introduction of the surgical concept of total mesorectal excision (TME) and the implementation of multimodal treatment strategies. Additionally, it has recently been demonstrated that the oncological results of open and laparoscopic TME are comparable. For some time there has been an ongoing debate on the potential relevance of robotic assistance systems in visceral surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the operative and perioperative outcomes of patients with rectal or rectosigmoid cancer, who were operated on using the Da Vinci Surgical System.

PATIENTS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed the outcomes of 202 consecutive patients, who were operated between September 2010 and November 2015 in three Surgical Centers. The cohort consisted of 136 men and 66 women with a mean BMI of 28. We performed the following procedures: 49 anterior rectal resections, 119 low anterior rectal resections, and 34 abdominoperineal excisions. Conversion to an open procedure was required in 13 patients. Non-surgical complications (n = 27) occurred in 24 patients (12%) and surgical complications (n = 67) in 62 patients (31%). Most complications were due to abdominal or sacral wound infections (n = 25) and anastomotic leaks (n = 18). The mortality rate within 30 days was 2%. The rate of R0 resections was 95%, with circumferential resection margins being negative in 98% of the patients. The quality of the mesorectal resection was scored as good in 91% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The Da Vinci Surgical System can be used safely and with a low complication rate for surgical treatment of rectal cancer. While primary evidence suggests that the outcome of robotic-assisted surgery is comparable with open and laparoscopic surgery, its definitive value has to be determined upon publication of the prospective randomized ROLARR trial. The main advantages of the Da Vinci system are its endowristed instruments with multiple degrees of freedom and its optimised visualisation (3D, stable camera platform controlled by the surgeon). Another positive feature is the significant ergonomic advantage for the surgeon.

A phase II study of catumaxomab administered intra- and postoperatively as part of a multimodal approach in primarily resectable gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Postoperative relapse rate after gastrectomy and perioperative chemotherapy remain high in patients with advanced gastric cancer due to the spread of disseminated tumour cells in the peritoneal cavity. Perioperative administration of catumaxomab could potentially eliminate residual tumour cells after intended curative resection of the primary tumour.

METHODS

This open-label, phase II study investigated the safety and efficacy of catumaxomab following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent surgery in patients with resectable (T2-4, N+, M0) gastric adenocarcinoma. Patients received catumaxomab intra- (single 10 μg dose) and postoperatively (10, 20, 50 and 150 μg on days 7, 10, 13 and 16, respectively). The primary endpoint was the postoperative complication rate (maximum rate defined as <62 %) within 30 days after surgery in patients who received at least the first catumaxomab dose.

RESULTS

Of 64 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 58 underwent surgery and 54 received at least the first catumaxomab dose. Postoperative complications were reported in 18 of 54 evaluable patients (complication rate 33 %; 95 % confidence interval: 21-48 %); thus, the primary endpoint was met. The most frequent complications were pulmonary infection (17 %) and anastomosis insufficiency requiring surgery (11 %). The most common catumaxomab-related adverse events were pyrexia (67 %), leucocytosis (19 %), abdominal pain (17 %) and chills (17 %). The 4-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 38 and 50 %.

CONCLUSION

Intra- and postoperative administration of catumaxomab as part of a multimodal treatment approach was feasible and tolerable in patients with advanced gastric cancer and should be further investigated in a randomised trial.

[Completeness and quality of baseline data and follow-up in cancer registry--an analysis on the example of colorectal cancer]

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In Germany, data of cancer patients are recorded not only in epidemiological registers but also in clinical cancer registers. To ensure the networking of all included medical partners, quality control, and clinical research it is necessary that cancer cases are captured more or less completely. The aim of the present study was to compare the data sets of two registers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from patients with colorectal cancer from two large surgical clinics in Magdeburg are recorded in two registers - the Clinical Cancer Registry Magdeburg and the Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine at the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg. Here we compared the data sets in order to check the completeness of data capturing and to determine factors influencing the degree of completeness.

RESULTS

From all patients captured in the Institute of Quality Assurance, 78.9% are found also in the clinical cancer registry. The percentage improves over the course of time, but also depends on diagnostic criteria such as the staging. There are some differences between both registries, explainable by their specific objectives. Particularly, it is demonstrated that incomplete follow-up record may bias estimates of survival rates from registries.

CONCLUSION

Ensuring the completeness and correctness of data is a major challenge for cancer registries. It has distinct influence on estimated quality parameters such as survival rates.

NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma-Very good response predominantly in patients with intestinal type tumors

Perioperative treatment is a standard of care in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC) (gastric adenocarcinoma and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma). While preoperative treatment can be applied to the majority of patients, postoperative chemotherapy can be given only to a fraction. The NeoFLOT-study therefore investigates the application of prolonged neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Patients with T3, T4, and/or node-positive adenocarcinoma (GEC) were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. NACT consisted of 6 cycles of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) , leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) , 5-fluorouracil 2600 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) (FLOT) applied q 2 wks. Application of adjuvant chemotherapy was explicitly not part of the protocol. R0-resection rate was evaluated as a primary endpoint. Of 59 enrolled patients, 50 patients underwent surgery and were assessable for the primary endpoint. R0-resection rate was 86.0% (43/50). Pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20.0% (10/50) and a further 20% (10/50) of patients achieved near complete histological remission (<10% residual tumor). Among these very good responders, 85% (17/20) had intestinal type tumors, 10% (2/20) had diffuse and 5% (1/20) had mixed type tumors. After 3 cycles of NACT, 6.9% (4/58) of patients developed progressive disease. Median disease-free survival was 32.9 months. The 1-year survival-rate was 79.3%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included neutropenia 29.3%, febrile neutropenia 1.7%, diarrhea 12.1% and mucositis 6.9%. This study indicates that intensified NACT with 6 cycles of FLOT is highly effective and tolerable in resectable GEC. Very good response (pCR and <10% residual tumor) was predominantly observed in patients with intestinal type tumors.

Adjuvant treatment for resected rectal cancer: Effect of postoperative oxaliplatin added to 5-FU in the neoadjuvant era

672

Background: Oxaliplatin (Ox) added to postoperative 5-fluorouracil (5FU) based adjuvant treatment has shown a survival benefit in colon cancer. For rectal cancer, the impact of Ox on survival has almost exclusively been tested in studies using 5FU +/- Ox both as a component of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and as adjuvant treatment. Only one study (NCT00807911) investigated adjuvant 5FU +/- Ox in patients undergoing preop 5FU based CRT without Ox. Thus, the evidence for the benefit of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU in patients treated with preop 5FU based CRT is limited. Methods: Data from the prospective German multicenter Quality Assurance in Rectal Cancer observational trial involving more than 300 hospitals of all levels of care throughout Germany were retrospectively analyzed. Patients undergoing R0 total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer following neoadjuvant 5FU based treatment without oxaliplatin between 01/01/2008 and 12/31/2010 were included. Disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving adjuvant treatment with or without Ox was compared using the Kaplan Meier method. The impact of adjuvant treatment with 5FU with or without Ox on DFS was investigated in a Cox regression analysis including open vs. laparoscopic approach, pT stage, pN stage, tumor grading, TME quality grade, and presence of anastomotic leakage as potential confounding factors. Results: The entire data set included 1,861 patients. Data for all variables investigated were available for 599 patients of whom 512 (85%) and 89 (15%) received 5FU based adjuvant treatment without and with Ox, respectively. Mean DFS was not different in patients receiving 5FU only vs. 5FU with Ox (p=0.103). Cox regression analysis revealed no significant impact of adding Ox to adjuvant 5FU on DFS. Of all factors analyzed, only pN2 (vs. pN0) status had an independent adverse effect on DFS (Hazard ratio 4.22, p<0.001). Conclusions: These data indicate that adjuvant Ox added to 5FU does not provide a DFS benefit in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative 5FU based CRT under routine care conditions. Rectal cancer patients may be different from patients with colon cancer with respect to benefit from adjuvant Ox.

Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: Oncologic outcome of neoadjuvant treatment in the German multicenter observational study II

139

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is broadly established in European centers when treating locally advanced gastric cancer. However, there still remain questions as to the benefit of this extended form of treatment in regards to tumor location and stage. Methods: Data obtained in the ongoing prospective, multicenter observational study (German Gastric Cancer Study II) on quality assurance in surgical therapy of gastric cancer containing a total of 2897 patients treated from 01/01/2007 through 31/12/2009 in 145 surgical departments to evaluate. Results: Overall, 506 patients (18.4%) received neoadjuvant treatment in regards to all tumor stages. Of the 530 patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) 34.5% (n=183) received chemotherapy. In detail, 30.1% (n=873) of the patients were found to be in stage I. In regards to the mean time of survival for advanced stages (III/IV 6th editiion) a survival benefit for patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment (n=356) of 12.0 months was demonstrated versus 10.0 months (p=0.048) for patients not being treated neoadjuvantly. Improved survival through neoadjuvant treatment could not be demonstrated in GEJ tumors, both, comparing different types of GEJ and matching cancer of the GEJ and distal gastric cancer. Overall survival in GEJ tumors is significantly lower (25 months) compared to the overall survival in distal gastric cancers (38 months). In addition, 5-year survival rate of GEJ tumor patients (33.1 %) was distinctly lower than for patients with distal gastric cancer (41.4 %). Conclusions: The results reflect the difficulties of applying currently available study results to daily clinical practice. In order to achieve improved treatment results, requirements in diagnostics, oncological and surgical settings are paramount. Future data of this observational study can provide additional insight for this process.

Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and long-term outcomes among patients with resected pancreatic cancer: the CONKO-001 randomized trial

IMPORTANCE

The prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer is poor, even after resection with curative intent. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer, but its effect on survival in the adjuvant setting has not been demonstrated.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether previously reported improvement in disease-free survival with adjuvant gemcitabine therapy translates into improved overall survival.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

CONKO-001 (Charité Onkologie 001), a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of gemcitabine in patients with pancreatic cancer after complete tumor resection. Patients with macroscopically completely removed pancreatic cancer entered the study between July 1998 and December 2004 in 88 hospitals in Germany and Austria. Follow-up ended in September 2012.

INTERVENTIONS

After stratification for tumor stage, nodal status, and resection status, patients were randomly assigned to either adjuvant gemcitabine treatment (1g/m2 d 1, 8, 15, q 4 weeks) for 6 months or to observation alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included treatment safety and overall survival, with overall survival defined as the time from date of randomization to death. Patients lost to follow-up were censored on the date of their last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 368 patients were randomized, and 354 were eligible for intention-to-treat-analysis. By September 2012, 308 patients (87.0% [95% CI, 83.1%-90.1%]) had relapsed and 316 patients (89.3% [95% CI, 85.6%-92.1%]) had died. The median follow-up time was 136 months. The median disease-free survival was 13.4 (95% CI, 11.6-15.3) months in the treatment group compared with 6.7 (95% CI, 6.0-7.5) months in the observation group (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.44-0.69]; P < .001). Patients randomized to adjuvant gemcitabine treatment had prolonged overall survival compared with those randomized to observation alone (hazard ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.61-0.95]; P = .01), with 5-year overall survival of 20.7% (95% CI, 14.7%-26.6%) vs 10.4% (95% CI, 5.9%-15.0%), respectively, and 10-year overall survival of 12.2% (95% CI, 7.3%-17.2%) vs 7.7% (95% CI, 3.6%-11.8%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with macroscopic complete removal of pancreatic cancer, the use of adjuvant gemcitabine for 6 months compared with observation alone resulted in increased overall survival as well as disease-free survival. These findings provide strong support for the use of gemcitabine in this setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN34802808.

[Surgical treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction - results achieved in multicentre studies]

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction are increasingly being considered as a separated tumour entity. The prognosis is rather poorer compared with that for distal gastric cancer. Data from a multicentre study as part of research on clinical care aim to reflect the current situation in surgical treatment after inauguration of neoadjuvant modalities.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

As part of the ongoing prospective multicentre observational study QCGC 2 (German Gastric Cancer Study 2), 544 adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction (AEG 1-3) were registered from 01/01/2007 to 12/31/2009.

RESULTS

Patients underwent surgical intervention in 108 (76.6 %) of the 141 surgical departments which provided data to the study. In 391 patients (82.5 %), R0 resection was achieved. Almost 60 % of the carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction were approached in departments with no more than 10 of these tumour lesions through the whole study period (3 years). Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 283 cases (53 %); the rate of neoadjuvant treatment was 34.4 % (n = 187). Intraoperative fresh frozen section was only included in intraoperative decision-making in 242 patients (60.8 %). In the revealed heterogeneous spectrum of surgical interventions, a limited number of transthoracic approaches (20 %) and a mediastinal lymphadenectomy rate of only 47 % were found. Hospital lethality was 6.6 %. In the adenocarcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction, a significantly lower median survival (25 months) compared with distal gastric cancer (38 months) was observed depending on the tumour stage. In addition, 5-year survival rate of AEG patients (33.1 %) was distinctly lower than for patients with distal gastric cancer (41.4 %). There was no significantly better survival by neoadjuvant treatment in the group of investigated patients.

CONCLUSION

The results in the treatment of carcinomas of the oesophagogastric junction in the multicentre setting including surgical departments of each profile and region even after introduction of multimodal therapeutic concepts are not satisfying. In particular, modern diagnostic and surgical strategies need to be widely used or their percentage has to be increased. In this context, centralisation of the surgical care of this specific tumour entity appears reasonable.

[Surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma. German multicenter observational studies]

The aim of the review is to compare the results of selected German multicenter observational studies on the surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma within the last two decades. Overall, 6,035 patients with gastric cancer who had been registered in numerous German comprehensive surgical clinics and departments in the time periods 1986-1989, January through December 2002 and 2007-2009 were enrolled in this analysis. In particular, the study aimed to investigate the most important criteria and factors with an impact on the perioperative and early postoperative outcome including the effects on oncological long-term results. In addition to the advances in diagnostic procedures and surgical techniques, the impact of multimodal therapeutic concepts which have been established particularly in the third investigation period is emphasized.

Stratification of patients with colorectal cancer of UICC stage II using prognostic mutations signatures obtained by deep amplicon sequencing of cancer genes

377

Background: Assignment of patients (pts) with UICC-stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) to adjuvant therapy remains controversial. The clinical utility of histo-pathological parameters (pT4, L+, V+) as well as tumor RNA expression signatures like Oncotype Dx Colon Cancer Assay, ColoPrint, or Predictor C is low given their positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.13, 0.22, 0.19, and 0.33, respectively, when adjusted to an incidence of 10% for occurrence of metastatic disease (mets) within 3 years after diagnosis. Methods: We applied deep amplicon sequencing of 48 well-known cancer genes to DNA samples of primary tumors from 173 pts with UICC-stage II CRC using the Illumina MiSeq technology. Patients were selected from a prospective, multicenter clinical diagnostic study named MSKK. More than 6,500 patients with CRC have been recruited into this study conducted by 39 hospitals in Germany. 79 of the 173 pts had progression of disease events within 3 years after R0 resection including 40 pts with mets, 12 pts with local recurrences, and 27 pts with secondary malignancies. 94 pts remained progression-free. Results: Deep sequencing revealed a total of 2,221 sequence variations (SV) including missense, stop, InDel, noncoding, nonsense SV. 401 SV were in COSMIC, 750 SV in normal tissue. The remaining 1471 SV served as basis for development of SV-signatures (SVS) for prediction of progression events in a classical double-nested bootstrap approach in order to generate second order unbiased estimates of performance of SVS, namely sensitivity(S+), specificity (S-), PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV). The best SVS for prediction of metastases contained SV in less than 15 genes and has a S+ of 0.41, S- of 0.93, PPV of 0.40, and NPV of 0.93 (incidence of metastasis: 10%). The best SVS for prediction any progression event has a S+ of 0.33, S- of 0.93, PPV of 0.54, and NPV of 0.84 (incidence for any progression = 20.5%). Conclusions: This deep sequencing based prognostic tissue test with a PPV of 40% and a NPV of 93% represents a milestone over prognostic tests based on RNA expression. The increased PPV leads to more patients being treated correctly with adjuvant therapy.

Two-year follow-up of a phase II study on catumaxomab as part of a multimodal approach in primarily resectable gastric cancer

4095^

Background: Perioperative chemotherapy (CT) has demonstrated as survival benefit in locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) in randomized trials. However, the overall cure rate is 30-40% and a significant number of patients are not able to receive the postoperative part of their CT regimen. In Europe, the trifunctional antibody catumaxomab is approved for the treatment of malignant ascites based on a pivotal trial which also included GC patients. A new multimodal approach combining neoadjuvant CT, followed by gastrectomy and intraperitoneal (i.p.) immunotherapy with catumaxomab was assessed in a single-arm multicenter phase II study. We here report 2-year follow-up data. Methods: GC pts (T2/T3/T4, N+/–, M0) received 3 cycles of neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidin/platinum-based CT followed by ’en-bloc’ R0-gastrectomy. Catumaxomab was administered i.p. as intraoperative bolus (10 µg) followed by 4 consecutive 3-hour infusions of 10-150 µg. Primary safety endpoint was the rate of predefined postoperative complications observed during 30 days after surgery. Key efficacy endpoints included disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: The original study data presented at the WCGC in 2011 (Schuhmacher et al.,Ann Oncol (2011) 22(suppl. 5)) showed that the primary endpoint was met and the described application regimen is safe. At time of surgery, 27.8% of patients were stage I, 27,8% of patients were stage II, 22,3% of patients were stage III and 14,8% of patients were stage IV as assessed according to pTNM measures. At 24 months 39/54 (safety analysis set) patients were still alife,14/54 were dead, (one patient lost to follow-up), 24/37 had no progression, only 13/37 patients relapsed (for 2 patients disease status was not recorded). At the 2 year cut off DFS was 56.4% (95% CI: 41–69%), OS was 75% (95% CI: 60–85%). Conclusions: Catumaxomab as part of a multimodal therapy in primarily resectable GC is a feasible option. The 2-year follow up efficacy results show promising data for DFS and OS in a cohort of locally advanced gastric cancer pts.

NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma

4072

Background: The rationale of the NeoFLOT-trial was the intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) by prolongation of preoperative treatment. This strategy is based on the notion that while perioperative treatment is notably beneficial in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC), postoperative chemotherapy can only be applied in a fraction of patients (pts). Methods: Pts with T3, T4 and/or N+ adenocarcinoma (GEC) were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. NACT consisted of 6 cycles of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 and docetaxel 50 mg/m2 (FLOT) applied q 2 wks. Staging was performed after 3 cycles to select pts with progressive disease (PD) for immediate surgery. Primary endpoint was the R0-resection rate. Secondary endpoints included the pathological complete response rate (pCR), histologic tumor regression grade (Becker 2003), safety, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From 10/2009 to 06/2011, 59 pts were enrolled of whom 58 pts were assessable for safety. Median age was 61 years (range: 32-79), 58.6% (34/58) had tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. 50 pts underwent surgery and were assessable for the primary endpoint. R0-resection rate was 86.0% (43/50). pCR was achieved in 20.0% (10/50) of pts. During NACT, 6.9% (4/58) of pts developed progressive disease. Dose reduction was performed in 43.1% (25/58) of pts resulting in a median dose intensity of 89.2%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 29.3% (17/58) of pts, febrile neutropenia grade 3/4 in 1.7% (1/58). Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were diarrhea (13.8% (8/58)) and mucositis (6.9% (4/58)). Treatment related mortality was 3.4% (2/58) with 2 cases of sepsis. After a median follow-up of 9.1 months, median PFS and OS have not been reached. Conclusions: These data indicate that NACT with 6 cycles FLOT is well-tolerated and highly effective in resectable GEC.

Detector-C 2.0: A highly accurate blood-based IVD test for early detection of colorectal cancer with sensitivity and specificity over 90%

393

Background: We previously reported on the discovery and prospective validation of a blood based test (Detector C) for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). Detector C measures 202 RNA markers in white blood cells as a response of the host to tumor formation and growth. Detector C was validated using a prospective, multicenter case-control study with 343 patients (pts), 210 cases with confirmed CRC and 133 controls undergoing a complete screening colonoscopy. Detector C has a validated sensitivity (S+) of 90% (95% CI 0.851-0.937) and specificity (S-) of 88% (95% CI 0.812-0.930) (Rosental A. et al, J Clin Oncol 28:7s, 2010 (suppl; abstr 3580)). We now present the discovery of Detector C 2.0 based on 445 samples representing most of the pts previously used in the discovery and validation sets of Detector C.

Methods: We used Affymetrix U133 plus 2.0 expression data of 291 CRC cases and 154 controls for discovery of Detector C 2.0. Random forest was used for feature (gene) selection and the support vector machine algorithm was employed as classifier in 600 repetitions of double-nested bootstraps to discriminate between cases and controls. Within each repetition, randomly chosen 23 controls and 160 CRC cases served as prospective validation set. The most frequent chosen genes for discrimination between cases and controls formed the consensus signature, namely Detector C 2.0.

Results: Choosing a signature length of 1000 genes resulted in the following second order unbiased prospective performance estimates: S+=0.916 (95% CI 0.863-0.954) and S-= 0.948 (95% CI 0.773-0.994). S+ for UICC stage I and stage II cases were 0.93 and 0.94. S+ for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia was ∼ 0.67 and S+ for adenoma ≥ 10 mm was ∼ 0.45.

Conclusions: Using a three times larger discovery set for Detector C 2.0 than for Detector C we improved S+ (cancer detection rate) by 1.6% to 91.6%. The most important enhancement is the high S- of 94.8% of Detector C 2.0 which is six percent higher than the S- of Detector C. Detector C 2.0 is based on a much larger pts set and should be even more robust than Detector C. We will prospectively validate this test in the largest case-control study ever performed in early detection of CRC.

Endorectal ultrasound in rectal carcinoma--do the literature results really correspond to the realities of routine clinical care?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

This multicenter, prospective, country-wide quality-assurance study at more than 300 hospitals in Germany was designed to characterize and analyze the diagnostic accuracy of rectal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the routine clinical staging of rectal carcinoma (depth of tumor infiltration).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were surveyed between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2008. Those who received neoadjuvant therapy after EUS were excluded. The correspondence between the EUS assessment of tumor depth (uT) and that determined by histology (pT) was calculated, and the influence of hospital volume upon the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values was investigated.

RESULTS

At 384 hospitals providing care at all levels, 29 206 patients were included; of the 27 458 treated by surgical resection, EUS was performed for 12 235 (44.6 %). Of these, 7096 did not receive neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy, allowing a uT-pT comparison. The uT-pT correspondence was 64.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 63.6 % - 65.8 %); the frequency of understaging was 18 % (95 %CI 17.1 % - 18.9 %) and that of overstaging was 17.3 % (95 %CI 16.4 % - 18.2 %). The kappa coefficient was greatest in the category T1 (κ = 0.591). For T3 tumors κ was 0.468. The poorest correspondence was found for T2 and T4 tumors (κ = 0.367 and 0.321, respectively). A breakdown by hospital volume showed that the uT-pT correspondence was 63.2 % (95 %CI 61.5 % - 64.9 %) for hospitals undertaking ≤ 10 EUS/year, 64.6 % (95 %CI 62.9 % - 66.2 %) for doing 11 - 30 EUS/year, and 73.1 % (95 %CI 69.4 % - 76.5 %) for those hospitals performing > 30 EUS/year.

CONCLUSIONS

In clinical routine, the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasound in staging rectal carcinoma does not attain the very good results reported in the literature. Only in the hands of diagnosticians with a large case volume of rectal carcinoma patients can EUS lead to therapy-relevant decisions.

Abstract LB-317: BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in addition to KRAS, improve prediction of resistance to cetuximab in a large panel of colon carcinoma xenografts

Accurate prediction of response to therapy is a prerequisite for individualized approaches to colorectal cancer treatment. Testing of various cancer drugs on the individual patient tumor can support selection of effective therapies. To this end, we have established 149 stably passageable NOD/SCID mouse tumor xenografts from patients of all four Dukes stages within the framework of the prospective multicenter clinical study. All patients gave written informed consent prior to surgery.

In a pharmacological study, 75 xenograft tumor models underwent single-agent treatment with oxaliplatin (OX), cetuximab (CE), or bevacizumab (BE). Each of the 75 tumors was transplanted onto 20 mice (5 controls and 5 for each drug). Models with a treated-to-control tumor growth ratio of 20% or lower were defined as responders. This resulted in response rates of 7% for OX, 24% for CE, and 4% for BE.

Mutation analysis was conducted on 71 xenografts by allele-specific RT-PCR for the following hotspots: KRAS: 34G&gt;A, 34G&gt;T, 34G&gt;C, 35G&gt;A, 35G&gt;T, 35G&gt;C, 38 G&gt;A and 436 G&gt;A; BRAF: 1799 T&gt;A, and PIK3CA: 1624G&gt;A, 1633G&gt;A, 3140A&gt;G. KRAS mutations were found in 46%, BRAF in 10%, and PIK3CA in 15% of the xenografts. 59% of the xenografts carry at least one mutation. KRAS mutations were never observed together with BRAF-mutations while it combined with PIK3CA in 8 cases (11%). The corresponding primary tumors showed the same mutation profile.

We examined mutation status with response to therapy to CE and OX. 3/5 OX responders were KRAS wildtype (wt) (Sensitivity (S+) 66%) while 31/66 OX non-responders were KRAS mutated (Specificity (S-) 46%). If also mutations in BRAF and PIK3CA are considered 40/60 OX non-responders were identified (S-66%). Of the 18 CE responders, all are wt for BRAF and PIK3CA. Three show mutations of KRAS, two of them in codon 13, which seems to confirm a recently published clinical observation by De Roock et al. (JAMA 2010, 304:1812) that this mutation may be related to an improved response under CE treatment. Wt status in all three genes was observed in 83% of the responders. KRAS mutations were seen in 57% of the non-responders. If mutations in BRAF and PIK3CA are also considered, the fraction of recognized non-responders increases to 73%.

We also investigated how well response can be predicted from the mutation data. A machine learning approach was used to estimate unbiased prospective prediction rates for response to CE based on the mutation profile. In each of a large number of bootstrap loops, a new predictor was trained on a new randomly selected subset of the tumors and applied to the remaining tumors. KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CAmutations achieve a S+ of 84% (95% CI: 59% and 96%) and a S- of 68% (95% CI: 54% and 80%).

KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status combined has potential clinical utility higher than KRAS alone to individualize CE treatment, also in the adjuvant setting, for patients with Dukes B and Dukes C.

Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr LB-317. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-LB-317