Interscalene anesthesia for shoulder arthroscopy in a community-sized military hospital

Combination of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block with General Anesthesia Attenuates Stress and Inflammatory Response in Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

Abstract In arthroscopic shoulder surgery, general anesthesia (GA) is the common method of anesthesia. Recently, the combined usage of interscalene brachial plexus block with general anesthesia (ISB/GA) was reported to have a lower incidence of adverse side effects than GA alone. However, to date, no study has compared stress and inflammatory responses between these two methods. Since stress and inflammatory responses are critical on intraoperative management and postoperative recovery, we integrated the laboratory and clinical methods and compared the stress and inflammatory factors, such as epinephrine, norepinephrine, glucose, lactate, inflammatory factors tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6), as well as the clinical outcomes to determine whether ISB/GA provides an advantage on stress and inflammatory inhibition. Data showed that ISB/GA resulted in significantly lower epinephrine, norepinephrine, and glucose levels perioperatively. Six hours after operation, the TNF-α and IL-6 levels were also significantly lower in the ISB/GA group. ISB/GA patients had lower blood pressure, a more stable heart rate, lower visual analog scale score, and less opioid consumption during and after surgery. Our results indicate that ISB/GA is a better choice for arthroscopic shoulder surgery, owing to less stress and inflammatory responses during and after operation, which provides better clinical outcomes. Therefore, we recommend ISB/GA as a preferred anesthesia method for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Regional anaesthesia for surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal

INTRODUCTION

Regional anaesthesia (RA) is often used in shoulder surgery because it provides adequate postoperative analgesia and may enhance the patient outcome. RA reduces overall opioid consumption and is frequently used in enhanced recovery programs to decrease hospital stay. However, there is very limited literature confirming these advantages in the surgical repair of proximal humerus fractures. This paper reviews the current literature on the use of RA in pain management after surgical repair of these fractures and evaluates the effect of RA on the functional outcome, length of stay in hospital, and health care expenditure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to March 1, 2018. Studies investigating the use of RA in the management of proximal humerus fractures were included.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (containing 1872 patients) were eligible for inclusion. The analgesic effect of RA was investigated in eight studies that confirmed its pain-relieving ability. Two studies measured functionality and length of hospitalization and suggested that RA improved function and shortened the stay in hospital. Nine papers mentioned side effects associated with RA while three articles claim that RA decreases the incidence of adverse events associated with general anaesthesia.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that RA is a good option for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing surgical repair of a proximal humerus fracture and is associated with fewer adverse events, a shorter recovery time, and a better functional outcome than those achieved by general anaesthesia alone. However, given the limited amount of data available, conclusions need to be made with caution and prospective studies are needed in the future.

Comparison of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Performed With and Without Steroids

This prospective comparative clinical study was performed to evaluate the effect of triamcinolone when added to bupivacaine during brachial plexus blockade in patients undergoing shoulder surgery. Interscalene brachial plexus blocks were performed on 910 patients before shoulder surgery. Of the patients, 574 were randomly allocated to receive steroids added to the injected local anesthetic and 336 patients received local anesthetic without steroids. All patients were followed prospectively to evaluate the rate of successful anesthesia, duration of anesthesia, side effects of the block, adverse events, and persistent neurologic complications associated with interscalene brachial plexus block. Patients who received steroids had statistically longer pain relief than those who did not receive steroids (P<.001). No difference was found in adverse events, complications, or side effects. Compared with blocks performed without steroids, a statistically longer duration of block analgesia occurred with the addition of steroids to the local anesthetic solution during brachial plexus blockade. Rates of side effects, adverse events, and persistent neurologic complications were similar between the groups. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1100-e1103.].

Blood pressure response to combined general anaesthesia/interscalene brachial plexus block for outpatient shoulder arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Shoulder surgery is often performed in the beach-chair position, a position associated with arterial hypotension and subsequent risk of cerebral ischaemia. It can be performed under general anaesthesia or with an interscalene brachial plexus block, each of which has specific advantages but also specific negative effects on blood pressure control. It would be worthwhile to combine the advantages of the two, but the effects of the combination on the circulation are not well investigated. We studied blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of adverse circulatory events in patients undergoing shoulder surgery in general anaesthesia with or without an interscalene block.

METHODS

Prospective, randomised, blinded study in outpatients (age 18 to 80 years) undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. General anaesthesia was with propofol/opioid, interscalene block with 40 ml 1% mepivacaine. Hypotension requiring treatment was defined as a mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg or a systolic pressure <80% of baseline; relevant bradycardia was a heart rate <50 bpm with a decrease in blood pressure.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients had general anaesthesia alone, 41 had general anaesthesia plus interscalene block. The average systolic blood pressure under anaesthesia in the beach-chair position was 114 ± 7.3 vs. 116 ± 8.3 mmHg (p = 0.09; all comparisons General vs. General-Regional). The incidence of a mean arterial pressure under 60 mmHg or a decrease in systolic pressure of more than 20% from baseline was 64% vs. 76% (p = 0.45). The number of patients with a heart rate lower than 50 and a concomitant blood pressure decrease was 8 vs. 5 (p = 0.30).

CONCLUSION

One can safely combine interscalene block with general anaesthesia for surgery in the beach-chair position in ASA I and II patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

DRKS00005295.

Current concepts in anaesthesia for shoulder surgery

There has been an exponential growth in the volume of shoulder surgery in the last 2 decades and a very wide variety of anaesthetic techniques have emerged to provide anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia. In this article we examine current opinion, risks, benefits and practicalities of anaesthetic practice and the provision of post-operative analgesia for shoulder surgery.

An anatomic and clinical study of the suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks for shoulder arthroscopy

HYPOTHESIS

The combination of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) and axillary nerve block (ANB) has been reported to provide safe and effective analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. This study was designed to identify anatomic landmarks of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) and axillary nerve (AN) and to evaluate the effects of SSNB and ANB using the identified landmarks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 52 cadaveric shoulders and 30 patients in the anatomic and clinical studies, respectively. After the exact location of the SSN and AN was identified from the cadavers, the clinical study at the end of the operation and at 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 48 hours postoperatively was performed in 2 groups: without both SSNB and ANB (group I) and with both SSNB and ANB (group II).

RESULTS

The SSN was located at a length of one-half (2/5-3/5, 88%) from the anterior tip of the acromion to the superior angle of the scapula and at a length of two-fifths (1/3-1/2, 100%) from the anterior tip of the acromion to the medial border of the spine. The AN was located at a length of three-fifths (2/5-4/5, 98%) from the acromial angle to the inferior insertion of the teres major muscle. The depth from the skin was 3.20 ± 0.58 cm for the SSN and 2.07 ± 0.45 cm for the AN. The clinical study showed that the total amount of analgesic for patient-controlled anesthesia was markedly decreased at the end of the operation and at 8 hours postoperatively in group II compared with group I.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSNB and ANB were considered to provide safe and effective analgesia in terms of early postoperative pain in arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

A prospective analysis of interscalene brachial plexus blocks performed under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this prospective study was to assess the safety and efficacy of interscalene brachial plexus block anesthesia when performed on patients who were anesthetized with a general anesthetic prior to the performance of the block.

METHODS

Patients were assessed postoperatively through surveys, interviews, and physical examinations to document block success, duration of anesthesia, block side effects, and persistent neurological complications. Nine-hundred fifty-one patients were available for the analysis.

RESULTS

The overall block success rate was 97% and the mean duration of anesthesia provided by the blocks was 23.9 hours. Immediate postoperative block side effects occurred in 16% (142 of 910), persistent neurological complications occurred in 4.4% (40 of 910) of patients, and long-term neurologic complications occurred in 0.8% (8 of 910).

CONCLUSION

Our study results suggest that the rates of success and complications associated with the performance of interscalene block regional anesthesia performed after induction of general anesthesia are similar to the results demonstrated in prior studies in which brachial plexus block was performed on nonanesthetized patients. Although significant complications were not common, this procedure is not without risk and can result in long-term neurologic complications.

Interscalene block for shoulder surgery in physician-owned community ambulatory surgery centers

PURPOSE

To retrospectively report on a series of patients who had interscalene block regional anesthesia performed for outpatient open and arthroscopic shoulder surgical procedures in a community-based ambulatory surgery center setting.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 1,945 patients who had interscalene block regional anesthesia performed during an 8-year period.

RESULTS

The complication rate was 0.63%, with all complications occurring in the immediate postoperative period, none of which were permanent.

CONCLUSIONS

With an expert, experienced anesthesia team, the interscalene block can be a safe method (temporary complication rate, 0.63%) of intraoperative anesthesia and perioperative analgesia for outpatient open and arthroscopic shoulder surgery in physician-owned ambulatory surgery centers.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY COMPARING TWO ANESTHETIC METHODS FOR SHOULDER SURGERY

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of suprascapular nerve block in combination with infusion of anesthetic into the subacromial space, compared with interscalene block.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with small or medium-sized isolated supraspinatus tendon lesions who underwent arthroscopic repair were prospectively and comparatively evaluated through random assignation to three groups of 15, each with a different combination of anesthetic methods. The efficacy of postoperative analgesia was measured using the visual analogue scale for pain and the analgesic, anti-inflammatory and opioid drug consumption. Inhalation anesthetic consumption during surgery was also compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The statistical analysis did not find any statistically significant differences among the groups regarding anesthetic consumption during surgery or postoperative analgesic efficacy during the first 48 hours.

CONCLUSION

Suprascapular nerve block with infusion of anesthetic into the subacromial space is an excellent alternative to interscalene block, particularly in hospitals in which an electrical nerve stimulating device is unavailable.

Suprascapular nerve block as a method of preemptive pain control in shoulder surgery

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in shoulder surgery. The study group consisted of 260 patients, which were subjected to shoulder operations. The patients were divided into two equal groups: group I with nerve block compared to a control group II without a nerve block. The mean age of the patients in group I was 56.2 +/- 6.86 years and that in group II was 54.5 +/- 7.06 years. The female to male ratio was 71:59 in group I and was 69:61 in group II. Surgical procedures were arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic subacromial decompression, arthroscopic acromioclavicular resection, arthroscopic removal of calcific tendonitis, arthroscopic reconstruction of instability, arthroscopic capsular release and shoulder replacement. In all cases the pain was documented by the visual analogue scale (VAS) preoperative, at the first, the second as well as at the third day after surgery. In order to evaluate the amount of fluid, which is needed for infiltration of the area of the supraspinatus fossa, we injected different amount of local anesthetic in combination with contrast dye in five patients. In this study to document the fluid distribution, after injecting with different milliliters, 10 ml is proved to be more than enough to have sufficient local anesthetic to block the SSN. Pre-operatively the mean VAS was comparable between both groups. We documented a significant difference in favour of SSNB from day 1 to day 3 after surgery. No specific complications due to this nerve block procedure were found in any patient post-operatively.

Continuous infusion of a local anesthetic versus interscalene block for postoperative pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the efficacy, complication rate, and cost of a 1-time interscalene block compared with a continuous infusion of a local anesthetic for postoperative pain relief in patients having arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

After prospective power analysis and institutional review board approval, 56 consecutive patients having arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia performed by a single surgeon were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups to evaluate postoperative pain control. Group 1 patients received a preoperative interscalene block, and group 2 patients received a subacromial continuous infusion of a local anesthetic (0.5% bupivacaine) via a pain pump for 48 hours postoperatively. Pain was evaluated at 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours and then daily on postoperative days 3 through 7 by use of a visual analog scale included in a patient diary. Patients were provided with 2 "rescue" medication options: ibuprofen and Percocet (Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, PA). The total number of tablets ingested was also evaluated over these same intervals. Total hospital outpatient surgical costs for each group were calculated by dividing total hospital charges by the ratio of annual hospital cost to charges.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were identified between the 2 groups with regard to visual analog scale pain scores, medication intake, or cost. Complications did not occur in either group. One patient inadvertently removed the pain pump catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the null hypothesis. We found no difference between interscalene block versus continuous subacromial infusion of a local anesthetic with regard to efficacy, complication rate, or cost.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, prospective, randomized controlled trial.

The types and severity of complications associated with interscalene brachial plexus block anesthesia: local and national evidence

Interscalene brachial plexus block is a commonly used anesthetic. However, substantial complications can be associated with its use. Our study included 15 years of data from a local medical center and 3 decades of records from the national American Society of Anesthesiology Closed Claims Project. The hospital had 27 peripheral neurologic injuries, 3 central nervous system complications, 6 respiratory complications, and 5 cardiovascular complications. Of these complications, 14 were still present at the most recent follow-up, some causing major compromise of the patient's comfort and function. All central blocks, local toxicities, and respiratory complications resolved. In the hospital series, more experienced anesthesiologists tended to have lower complication rates. The American Society of Anesthesiology Closed Claims database had 20 peripheral neurologic injuries, 10 respiratory complications, 5 central nervous system complications, 4 deaths, 2 emotional disturbances, and 1 other unknown event. Of the complications, 19 were described as permanent. Interscalene brachial plexus block can be accompanied by substantial and disabling complications, especially when administered by less experienced anesthesiologists.

Interscalene regional anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a safe and effective technique

There has been resistance to the use of interscalene regional block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery because of concerns about potential complications and failed blocks with the subsequent need for general anesthesia. The purpose of this study was to assess whether interscalene regional block is safe and effective and offers many advantages over general anesthesia for outpatient arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Through a retrospective chart review of consecutive arthroscopic shoulder surgeries over a 2.5-year time period, in a tertiary university medical center with an anesthesiology residency, 277 interscalene blocks (96%) were successful; 12 (4%) required general anesthesia because of an inadequate block. There were no seizures, pneumothoraces, cardiac events, or other major complications. There was a 1% rate of minor complications, all of which were transient sensory neuropathies that resolved within 5 weeks on average. We conclude that interscalene block can provide effective anesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Interscalene block anesthesia at an ambulatory surgery center performing predominantly regional anesthesia: a prospective study of one hundred thirty-three patients undergoing shoulder surgery

Interscalene block (ISB) of the brachial plexus is frequently used for patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery. We previously reported that the incidence of postoperative complaints (neurapraxia) after an ISB was low (3% at 2 weeks), but objective neurologic assessment was not included in the study. The present study combines subjective findings with both preoperative and postoperative objective sensory and motor assessments after an ISB. We prospectively evaluated 133 patients undergoing elective ambulatory shoulder surgery. ISB anesthesia was accomplished by use of 1.5% mepivacaine alone or in combination with bupivacaine (0.5%-0.75%) via a paresthesia technique and a 23-gauge needle. All of the blocks were performed by experienced anesthesiologists. The number of passes with the needle, site of paresthesia, ease of performing the block, and success of the ISB were recorded for each patient. Neurologic assessment was performed preoperatively and up to 2 weeks postoperatively by 1 of 4 health care professionals but not by the anesthesiologists who performed the ISB and included diminished sensation, localized nerve pain, Semmes-Weinstein monofilament pressure threshold sensibility, Weber static 2-point discrimination, and grip strength changes. Patients with postoperative changes were followed up until resolution of symptoms occurred. Successful surgical anesthesia was achieved in 98% of the patients. There was 1 major perioperative complication (0.7%), a seizure that occurred within 5 minutes of the ISB. Two (1.4%) complained of transient postoperative neurapraxias. Neither patient had any changes in objective sensory and motor measurements. Hence, there was no correlation between subjective complaints and objective findings in this study. This study demonstrates that, in the hands of anesthesiologists doing predominantly regional anesthesia, there is a 1.4% incidence of neurologic complications after an ISB. ISB is a safe and effective technique for patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery when an anesthesiologist experienced with regional anesthesia is involved.

Suprascapular nerve block for shoulder arthroscopy

The suprascapular nerve (SSN) originates from the C5 and C6 nerve roots and provides sensation for the posterior shoulder capsule, acromioclavicular joint, subacromial bursa, and coracoclavicular ligament. Blocking it provides pre-emptive anesthesia, decreased intraoperative pain, and postoperative pain relief in shoulder arthroscopy. Under general anesthesia, 25 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine is injected by a spinal needle placed 1 cm medial to the convergence of the spine and clavicle, angling toward the coracoid. At a depth of 3 to 4 cm, the needle strikes the scapula body. The surgeon probes with the needle anteriorly until the scapula is no longer felt, then moves the needle back posteriorly until the bone is felt again. This places the needle at the coracoid base in the supraspinatus fossa where the SSN curves around the coracoid and heads to the glenohumeral joint. At this point, the anesthetic is injected, "flooding" the SSN location. In addition to the SSN block, other pain-control procedures should be performed, including bupivacaine injection of all portals and an intra-articular injection of morphine sulfate at the end of the procedure. The SSN block is an effective technique and can reduce postoperative medication needs and allow earlier patient discharge from the surgery center.

Peripheral Nerve Blocks and Continuous Catheter Techniques

Peripheral nerve blocks provide intense, site-specific analgesia and are associated with a lower incidence of side effects when compared with many other modalities of postoperative analgesia. Continuous catheter techniques further prolong these benefits. These advantages can facilitate a prompt recovery and discharge and achieve significant perioperative cost savings. This is of tremendous value in a modern health care system that stresses cost-effective use of resources and a continued shift toward shorter hospital stay as well as outpatient surgery.

Comparison of the Haemodynamic Effects of Interscalene Block Combined with General Anaesthesia and Interscalene Block Alone for Shoulder Surgery

Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) anaesthesia is widely used with or without general anaesthesia in patients undergoing shoulder surgery, which is generally done with the patient in a sitting position. This position affects haemodynamics, and supplementing ISB with general anaesthesia can exaggerate these haemodynamic changes. This study compared ISB combined with general anaesthesia, with ISB alone, in 29 patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Heart rate and oxygen saturation remained stable throughout the study in both groups. Mean arterial pressure was significantly decreased when the patient moved into the sitting position in those given combined anaesthesia, whereas in those given ISB alone mean arterial pressure did not change significantly. Neither pain scores nor patient satisfaction scores differed significantly between the two groups. All of the patients were either satisfied or entirely satisfied with their anaesthesia/analgesia. There were no significant differences in side-effects and no severe complications in either group. We advocate using ISB alone for patients undergoing shoulder surgery, but further larger studies are needed to confirm the present results.

Interscalene block for elective shoulder surgery

This study assessed patient experiences with interscalene block anesthesia for elective shoulder surgery. Routine use of interscalene anesthesia was introduced at our institution in 1997. All patients who underwent interscalene anesthesia during the first 3 years of our experience with this regional anesthetic technique were asked to respond to an anesthesia-related questionnaire. Overall patient satisfaction with interscalene anesthesia was 87%, and success rate in achieving a complete motor and sensory block was 79%. The duration of pain relief postoperatively was 10.5 hours for patients with a successful block. Patients consistently reported that having an interscalene block was less painful than anticipated; 90% said they would have interscalene anesthesia again for shoulder surgery. This study demonstrates that interscalene anesthesia for elective shoulder surgery is safe and well accepted in this patient population.

Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml versus bupivacaine 5 mg/ml for interscalene brachial plexus block--a comparative study

We investigated ropivacaine 75 mg/ml in comparison with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml in patients receiving interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) and general anaesthesia. In this randomized, double-blind, prospective clinical trial, each patient received an ISB block according to the technique originally described by Winnie and a catheter technique as per Meier. The rapidity of onset and the quality of sensory and motor block were determined. After general anaesthesia had been induced further parameters evaluated were consumption of local anaesthetic, opioid and neuromuscular blocking drug. After arrival in the recovery room, the patients were assessed for intensity of pain using a visual analog scale (VAS). One hundred and twenty patients were included in the study. The onset and development of sensory block was similar in both groups. Development and quality of motor block was also nearly identical for both local anaesthetics. Consumption of neuromuscular blocking drug and opioid did not differ between ropivacaine and bupivacaine. In the recovery room the mean pain score was less than 25 in both groups. There were no significant differences in terms of onset and quality of sensory or motor block during the intraoperative and early postoperative period. In addition we did not identify any side-effects related to the administration of the local anaesthetics. Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml and bupivacaine 5mg/ml proved to be nearly indistinguishable when administered for interscalene brachial plexus block.

Scalene regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery in a community setting: an assessment of risk

BACKGROUND

A retrospective review of shoulder procedures using scalene block anesthesia was performed.

METHODS

The records of all 218 patients who had undergone scalene block anesthesia over a three-year period at two facilities were retrospectively reviewed. All blocks were performed with use of a standard blunt-needle technique with the patient awake and with use of preoperative nerve stimulation to localize the brachial plexus.

RESULTS

Adjunctive general anesthesia was used for 179 (82%) of the 218 patients. Seventy-two patients (33%) required intravenous pain medication immediately on arrival in the recovery room, and twenty-eight blocks (13%) failed. One grand mal seizure, one episode of cardiovascular collapse, and four episodes of severe respiratory distress were noted. Two patients had temporary neurologic injuries that persisted at six weeks. The mean duration of the block was 9 +/- 4.6 hours. Two hundred (92%) of the 218 patients required parenteral narcotics despite the use of scalene block anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

Informed consent discussions regarding scalene block anesthesia should include information on the prevalence of complications and the efficacy of the technique.

Subacromial and intra-articular morphine versus bupivacaine after shoulder arthroscopy

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have compared the effects of intra-articular bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative pain control after arthroscopy of the knee. To date, these agents have not been compared in the shoulder. The purpose of this study was to compare intra-articular (IA)/subacromial (SA) morphine, bupivacaine, and placebo after shoulder arthroscopy.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

METHODS

The effectiveness of each drug was measured by comparing the amount of supplemental analgesics required as well as the evaluation of each patient's level of pain after surgery. A visual analog scale was used to record each patient's level of pain before surgery and at various time intervals after surgery. The amount of supplemental analgesic was likewise recorded for 24 hours after surgery. Sixty-four patients were randomized into 3 groups and injected with morphine (n = 22), bupivacaine (n = 22), or saline (n = 20) at the conclusion of shoulder arthroscopy. The injection was directed intra-articular as well as subacromial if surgical dissection had been performed in this area. Statistical significance was determined at P <.05.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups before surgery. A statistically significant difference in pain level at 30 and 60 minutes was found. At 30 and 60 minutes, patients who were administered IA/SA bupivacaine reported average pain levels less than those administered morphine or saline. Morphine was not statistically different from saline at reducing postarthroscopy pain at any time interval. Despite differences in pain level, there were no significant differences in the amount of supplemental analgesics requested at any time interval among these 3 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

IA/SA morphine does not contribute to postoperative pain control after shoulder arthroscopy, whereas IA/SA bupivacaine improves pain control during the first 60 minutes after surgery.

Comparison of postoperative pain in patients receiving interscalene block or general anesthesia for shoulder surgery

A retrospective review of 114 patients who underwent elective shoulder surgery from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1996 was performed. Eighty-eight patients received general anesthesia and 26 patients received regional anesthesia (interscalene block). There were no differences in surgical and anesthesia time and time to hospital discharge between groups. Patients who received regional anesthesia had a shorter recovery room stay (63 +/- 25 minutes versus 85 +/- 33 minutes [P.002]) and required less intraoperative fentanyl (174 +/- 96 microg versus 379 +/- 193 microg [P<.0001) and morphine in the recovery room (2 +/- 3 mg versus 6 +/- 7 mg [P=.006]). A higher percentage of patients who received regional anesthesia had a lower pain rating at 4 hours. Regional anesthesia for shoulder surgery decreases pain and facilitates recovery in the immediate postoperative period.

Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic stabilization of acute, initial anterior shoulder dislocations in young athletes. Two- to five-year follow-up

From March 1992 to November 1998, 57 patients sustained 58 acute, initial, traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations at the United States Military Academy. Six patients selected nonoperative treatment. Three patients underwent primary open repair after diagnostic arthroscopy revealed no Bankart lesion amenable to repair with the bioabsorbable tissue tack. The remaining 48 patients with 49 anterior dislocations were treated with arthroscopic primary repair. There were 45 men and 3 women with an average age of 20 years (range, 17 to 23) and an average follow-up of 37 months (range, 24 to 60). The average Rowe score was 92 (range, 30 to 100). The average single assessment numeric evaluation patient rating was 95.5% (range, 50% to 100%). The average Short Form-36 score (physical function) for the stable shoulders was 99 (range, 95 to 100). Forty-three shoulders remained stable (88%). There were six failures (12%). Factors associated with failure included a history of bilateral shoulder instability, a 2+ sulcus sign, and poor capsulolabral tissue at the time of repair. All patients with stable shoulders returned to their preinjury levels of athletic activity. With follow-up of 5 years, we have observed significantly better results compared with nonoperative treatment in young, active adults at the United States Military Academy.

Regional anesthesia for ambulatory surgery

Ambulatory surgery is increasing at unprecedented rates with more complex procedures being performed. This article reviews the benefits of the use of regional anesthesia during ambulatory surgeries. Regional anesthesia, by putting the anesthetic at the surgical site, provides ideal conditions for ambulatory surgery and provides a smooth, predictable post-operative course.

Selective capsular shift technique for anterior and anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability

Anterior and anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability is often successfully treated with nonoperative measures, especially in atraumatic instability. In the case of traumatic instability, especially when the labrum is detached from the anteroinferior glenoid rim, surgery is often necessary to stabilize the shoulder and restore function. An anatomic repair that addresses any capsular or labral defect is essential for a successful outcome, and the selective capsular shift technique offers the flexibility necessary to correct these deformities. Several equally important steps must be followed when treating anterior and anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability. These include the correct diagnosis and indications for surgery; a technically successful surgical procedure; and diligent, physician-directed, closely monitored rehabilitation.

Arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery. Complications

Complications associated with arthroscopic shoulder stabilization are relatively common. Excluding recurrence, complications are rarely disabling. Current statistics undoubtedly underestimate the true incidence of complications. Many complications, including neurovascular injuries and articular damage, are preventable and can be minimized through familiarity with anatomy, proper surgical technique and instrumentation, and clinical experience. Nevertheless, despite these efforts, a few complications, including recurrent instability, persist. Despite careful patient selection and attention to labral pathology and capsular laxity, arthroscopic repairs continue to have success rates lower than those achieved through open means. While cautiously proceeding toward a more complete understanding of the instability continuum, surgeons must maintain a high index of suspicion for new techniques that purport to "solve" the problem of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization, lest the history of enthusiastic but ultimately unsubstantiated claims is repeated. Outcomes must withstand the rigors of scientific scrutiny and the test of time. Without this cautious vigilance, the appeal of today's solutions becomes the fodder of tomorrow's articles about the complications of arthroscopic shoulder stabilization.