Functional sequelae after ulnar nerve repair. Study of forty-nine cases

Ulnar-Sided Upper Extremity Traumatic Wounds: What Should We Expect to Find?

Background: Upper limb traumatic injuries have a significant impact on social and professional life; however, there is still a paucity of studies focusing on the injuries of the ulnar border of the forearm, wrist and hand. Methods: We designed a retrospective single-blinded study, including all patients with deep traumatic wounds affecting the ulnar side of the forearm, wrist or hand, that received surgical treatment from 2006 until 2016. A characterisation of the sample, assessment of concomitant injuries and clinical outcomes, as well as neurological and functional evaluation were performed. Results: We obtained a sample of 61 patients, 69% with injuries affecting the wrist and 90% of patients with a neurological lesion, most frequently of the ulnar nerve lesion (UNL). Concomitant injuries included tendinous lesions, more frequently of the flexor carpi ulnaris (64%) and fractures (13%). And 39% of patients presented an ulnar artery lesion, without significant differences in outcomes regarding the completion of arteriorrhaphy or not. At the end of the 8.6 years follow-up, 34% of patients had no deficits; however, patients with UNL showed worse functional scores and greater risk of sequelae. Besides motor function compromise, sensory deficits were also associated with worst functional outcomes. Conclusions: The UNL subgroup showed important impairment of the first ray, probably related to the level of UNL. Furthermore, besides the implications of the motor sequelae, sensory deficits were also associated with worst functional scores. Due to the high percentage of neurovascular and tendinous lesions in ulnar-sided upper extremity wounds, the authors recommend surgical exploration of these lesions. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Subterminal key pinch dynamometry: a new method to quantify strength deficit in ulnar nerve paralysis

Precise pre- and postoperative assessments are fundamental to recording the quality of recovery after ulnar nerve repair. Because of its imprecision, manual muscle testing is being replaced by dynamometry to measure grasping and key-pinch strengths. However, both grasping and key pinch are dependent not only on the ulnar nerve but also the median and radial nerves. We propose to measure strength using a new sort of pinch, called the 'subterminal key pinch'. Strength was measured using a commercially available pinch meter. Patients applied pressure on the dynamometer with the interphalangeal joint of the thumb, maintaining the joint in extension to avoid enhancement of strength by the flexor pollicis longus. We examined 17 patients before ulnar nerve repair. Preoperatively, grasping strength was 46% of normal, while key pinch was 58%, pinch-to-zoom strength was 26% and subterminal key pinch only 7%. Subterminal key pinch was the most affected pinch with a strength deficit of over 90%.Level of evidence: IV.

Prior to Repair Functional Deficits in Above- and Below-Elbow Ulnar Nerve Injury

PURPOSE

Clinical deficits might vary, depending on whether an ulnar nerve lesion is above or below the elbow. Lack of strength and clawing are common manifestations of ulnar nerve paralysis. However, the magnitude of strength deficit relating to different pinch patterns and the rate and range of proximal interphalangeal extension deficits are poorly described.

METHODS

I prospectively evaluated 14 patients with above-elbow and 16 with below-elbow unrepaired ulnar nerve injuries. The completeness of flexion of the ring and little fingers was tested at the metacarpophalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. Proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag of the ring and little fingers was assessed by goniometry, and adduction and abduction of the little finger. With dynamometers, I bilaterally evaluated grasp, key pinch, and pinch-to-zoom strength. Hand sensibility was evaluated with monofilaments.

RESULTS

Metacarpophalangeal flexion in the ulnar fingers was absent in all patients, whereas distal interphalangeal joint flexion was preserved in 29 of 30 patients. In above-elbow ulnar nerve injuries, there was no paralysis of the flexor digitorum profundus. One-third of patients exhibited no clawing. There were minimal differences between the rate of clawing and proximal interphalangeal extension lag in above- and below-elbow ulnar nerve lesions, or its occurrence in the ring or little finger. In relation to the normal hand, grasping, key pinch, and pinch-to-zoom decreased by 62%, 51%, and 75% compared with 59%, 61%, and 76% in below- and above-elbow injuries groups, respectively. In both groups, sensory deficits were predominantly over the little finger and ulnar side of the hand.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimal differences were observed in clinical deficits after above- and below-elbow ulnar nerve injuries. Hand weakness was the most frequent problem, whereas pinch-to-zoom strength was highly affected.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic IV.

Outcome following nerve repair of high isolated clean sharp injuries of the ulnar nerve

OBJECTIVE

The detailed outcome of surgical repair of high isolated clean sharp (HICS) ulnar nerve lesions has become relevant in view of the recent development of distal nerve transfer. Our goal was to determine the outcome of HICS ulnar nerve repair in order to create a basis for the optimal management of these lesions.

METHODS

High ulnar nerve lesions are defined as localized in the area ranging from the proximal forearm to the axilla just distal to the branching of the medial cord of the brachial plexus. A meta-analysis of the literature concerning high ulnar nerve injuries was performed. Additionally, a retrospective study of the outcome of nerve repair of HICS ulnar nerve injuries at our institution was performed. The Rotterdam Intrinsic Hand Myometer and the Rosén-Lundborg protocol were used.

RESULTS

The literature review identified 46 papers. Many articles presented outcomes of mixed lesion groups consisting of combined ulnar and median nerves, or the outcome of high and low level injuries was pooled. In addition, outcome was expressed using different scoring systems. 40 patients with HICS ulnar nerve lesions were found with sufficient data for further analysis. In our institution, 15 patients had nerve repair with a median interval between trauma and reconstruction of 17 days (range 0-516). The mean score of the motor and sensory domain of the Rosen's Scale instrument was 58% and 38% of the unaffected arm, respectively. Two-point discrimination never reached less then 12 mm.

CONCLUSION

From the literature, it was not possible to draw a definitive conclusion on outcome of surgical repair of HICS ulnar nerve lesions. Detailed neurological function assessment of our own patients showed that some ulnar nerve function returned. Intrinsic muscle strength recovery was generally poor. Based on this study, one might cautiously argue that repair strategies of HICS ulnar nerve lesions need to be improved.

Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review was to present an analysis of the literature of the outcome studies reported in patients following traumatic upper-extremity (UE) nerve injuries (excluding amputation), to assess the presence of an association between neuropathic pain and outcome in patients following traumatic UE nerve injuries, and to provide recommendations for inclusion of more comprehensive outcome measures by clinicians who treat these patients.

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

A Medline and CINAHL literature search retrieved 48 articles. This review identified very few studies of patients with peripheral nerve injury that reported neuropathic pain. When pain was reported, visual analogue or numeric rating scales were most frequently used; standardized questionnaires measuring pain or psychosocial function were rarely administered. Recent evidence shows substantial long-term disability and pain in patients following peripheral nerve injury.

RECOMMENDATION

To better understand neuropathic pain in patients following peripheral nerve injury, future outcome studies should include valid, reliable measures of physical impairment, pain, disability, health-related quality of life, and psychosocial functioning.

[Is a dynamic or stable technique needed for metacarpophalangeal joints of the hand in ulnar nerve palsy?]

INTRODUCTION

It seems interesting to choose between the dynamic and the static techniques for the rehabilitation of the hand suffering from an ulnar nerve palsy on the basis of the grasp (F1) and pinch (F2) strengths which are important in this rehabilitation.

METHODS

From june 1997 to december 2001, 30 ulnar palsies all post traumatic with non complicated claw deformities have been collected and distributed in three groups of ten patients. In the group A only the static techniques have been used on the MP joints of the fourth and fifth digits and the thumb; in the group B only the dynamic techniques have been used on the fourth and fifth digits, on the flexor pollicis brevis and on the first dorsal interosseous muscle; in the group C, the MP joint of the thumb has been stabilized and dynamic techniques have been used on these two muscles, the MP joints of the fourth and fifth digits have been only stabilized. The techniques used in this study were among the most popular. The grasp and pinch strengths were measured by a mechanical dynamometer at the preoperative period and at third and sixth postoperative month.

RESULTS

At sixth month, in the group A, F1 didn't change and F2 has increased by 9%; in the group B, F1 has decreased by 24% without recovery of the preoperative value and F2 has increased by 13%; in the group C, F2 has increased by 19%.

DISCUSSION

For a reconstruction of an useful hand in an ulnar nerve palsy, the best solutions seem: for the fourth and fifth digits: simple stabilization of the MP joints for the thumb: an association of this stabilization and a rehabilitation of some muscles involved in the pinch prehension.