Future directions in the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery

Update on neuropathic pain treatment: ion channel blockers and gabapentinoids

Neuropathic pain is a debilitating chronic pain condition, which remains difficult to treat. The current mainstays of treatment include physical therapy, interventional procedures and medications. Among medications, ion channel blockers and gabapentinoids are the 2 classes of drugs commonly used to treat neuropathic pain. It has been suggested that these medications may be useful to treat a variety of neuropathic pain conditions. This article provides several updates on the utility of both ion channel blockers and gabapentinoids for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Combination therapy for neuropathic pain: a review of current evidence

Neuropathic pain is a debilitating chronic condition that remains very difficult to treat. Recently, a number of clinical studies have compared the effectiveness of combination drug therapy with monotherapy for neuropathic pain treatment. In this article, we summarize up-to-date clinical studies of combination therapy for the treatment of both cancer- and non-cancer-related neuropathic pain. Despite a relatively small number of clinical studies on this topic, several positive indications have emerged. First, clinical studies using gabapentin (five positive trials) and pregabalin (five positive trials and one negative trial) in combination with an opioid, cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor or antidepressant have shown positive responses greater than the respective monotherapies for pain related to diabetic neuropathy and postherpetic neuropathy. Second, high-concentration (8%) topical capsaicin and a 5% lidocaine patch seem to be effective add-on therapies (a modality of combination therapy) for various neuropathic pain conditions. Third, combination therapy for cancer-related neuropathic pain has yielded only limited success based on a number of small-scale clinical studies. While there are benefits of using combination therapy for neuropathic pain treatment, including better pain relief and reduced adverse effects, more clinical studies are required in order to (i) make head-to-head comparisons between combination and single-drug therapies, (ii) identify symptom-specific combination therapies for distinctive clinical neuropathic pain conditions, (iii) explore combination therapies that include non-drug modalities such as physical therapy, psychological coping and biofeedback to facilitate functional restoration and (iv) develop new and objective evaluation tools for clinical outcome assessment.

Current developments in intraspinal agents for cancer and noncancer pain

Since the late 1980s, intrathecal (IT) analgesic therapy has improved, and implantable IT drug delivery devices have become increasingly sophisticated. Physicians and patients now have myriad more options for agents and their combination, as well as for refining their delivery. As recently as 2007, The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference of expert panelists updated its algorithm for drug selection in IT polyanalgesia. We review this algorithm and the emerging therapy included. This article provides an update on newly approved as well as emerging IT agents and the advances in technology for their delivery.

Translational pain research: achievements and challenges

The achievements in both preclinical and clinical pain research over the past 4 decades have led to significant progress in clinical pain management. However, pain research still faces enormous challenges and there remain many obstacles in the treatment of clinical pain, particularly chronic pain. Translational pain research needs to involve a number of important areas including: 1) bridging the gap between pain research and clinical pain management; 2) developing objective pain-assessment tools; 3) analyzing current theories of pain mechanisms and their relevance to clinical pain; 4) exploring new tools for both preclinical and clinical pain research; and 5) coordinating research efforts among basic scientists, clinical investigators, and pain-medicine practitioners. These issues are discussed in this article in light of the achievements and challenges of translational pain research.

PERSPECTIVE

The subjective nature of clinical pain calls for innovative research approaches. As translational pain research emerges as an important field in pain medicine, it will play a unique role in improving clinical pain management through coordinated bidirectional research approaches between bedside and bench.

Inflammatory mass of an intrathecal catheter in patients receiving baclofen as a sole agent: a report of two cases and a review of the identification and treatment of the complication

INTRODUCTION

Intrathecal inflammatory masses or granuloma have been described extensively in the literature in patients receiving chronic spinal infusions for pain. After an extensive literature review, no reported cases of baclofen causing this disorder when administered as a sole agent were identified. Intrathecal baclofen has been used to treat spasticity secondary to stroke, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, and other neurological disease.

CASES

Two patients who received intrathecal infusions of baclofen to treat spasticity developed catheter failure. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis showed the presence of an inflammatory mass at the tip of each catheter causing the dysfunction. The catheters were removed and replaced by a percutaneous technique.

DISCUSSION

Inflammatory mass on an intrathecal catheter can result in a variety of symptoms. These problems range from the patient being asymptomatic to flaccid paraplegia. Animal studies have shown an association with high concentrations of morphine and hydromorphone theorized to be related to a mast cell degranulation response. Presence of this lesion in these two patients should heighten the suspicion for inflammatory mass in any patient treated for spasticity. The diagnosis of intrathecal catheter tip inflammatory mass is made after an initial suspicion of a catheter occlusion or failure. The gold standard of diagnosis is T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. A computerized tomography myelogram is acceptable if a magnetic resonance imaging is not feasible.

CONCLUSION

We report two cases of inflammatory mass in patients receiving baclofen as a sole intrathecal agent. The authors would recommend vigilance in any patient receiving intrathecal baclofen. If the suspicion arises of this problem, a magnetic resonance imaging or computerized tomography myelogram should be obtained with a focus on the catheter tip.

Stellenwert der intrathekalen Schmerztherapie

Intraspinal drug infusion using implantable pumps and catheter systems is a safe and effective therapy for selected pain patients with severe chronic pain. It improves pain relief, reduces drug-related side effects, decreases the need for oral analgesia and enhances quality of life in a segment of chronic pain patients whose pain has not been controlled with more conservative therapies. Intrathecal drug therapy has therefore established its role in the treatment of malignant pain, benign pain and severe spasticity.Careful patient selection and management as well as a multidisciplinary approach are determinants of successful treatment. Current practices for patient selection and management, screening, drug selection, dosing and implantation for intrathecal drug delivery systems are discussed.

Difficult Pain Syndromes

Cancer pain is prevalent in approximately two thirds of all cancer patients and can undermine the quality of life in this patient population. Uncontrolled pain can cause physical as well as psychological distress in cancer patients. As the disease progresses in cancer, pain and suffering increase. Knowledge about pain management is paramount in the comprehensive treatment of cancer patients. Difficult cancer pain syndromes may arise from interruption of bone, viscera, and neural structures by malignant spread of the disease. Familiarity with opioids, adjuvants, and procedures that can abate pain in cancer patients is discussed in a practical manner for clinical application in this text.

Stability of admixture containing morphine sulfate, bupivacaine hydrochloride, and clonidine hydrochloride in an implantable infusion system

Intrathecal infusion is often performed using drug combinations. This study was conducted to evaluate the stability of the admixture of morphine sulfate, bupivacaine hydrochloride, and clonidine hydrochloride when used in an implantable pump under simulated clinical use conditions. SynchroMed implantable pumps were filled with an admixture and incubated at 37 degrees C for a period of 90 days. Drug admixture stored in glass vials at 4 degrees C and at 37 degrees C served as controls. Samples which included pump reservoir and catheter delivered aliquots were collected every 30 days and analyzed for drug concentrations using a stability-indicating HPLC method. All drugs contained in the admixture were stable and the original concentrations remained greater than 96%. Over 90 days, and with the pump at the simulated body temperature of 37 degrees C, there were no evident heat catalyzed or device catalyzed reactions.

Stability of clonidine in clonidine-hydromorphone mixture from implanted intrathecal infusion pumps in chronic pain patients

Clonidine is frequently added to opioids in implantable intrathecal pumps for the management of chronic pain. In such devices, a small non-retrievable volume is always present in the reservoir, and its effect on drug stability is unknown. Furthermore, stability of clonidine, when mixed with hydromorphone, has not been previously determined. This study examined the stability of clonidine when co-administered with hydromorphone in implanted intrathecal pumps. Samples of hydromorphone-clonidine before pump refill and from residual solution at subsequent refill were obtained from chronic pain patients. Clonidine concentration was measured using HPLC. Twenty paired samples from 3 patients were analyzed. All 3 patients had a SynchroMed pump implanted for 3-5 years. We found no loss in clonidine concentration during the time between refills (35 +/- 13 days), and no correlation between clonidine concentration and time interval between refills. In conclusion, clonidine, mixed with hydromorphone, is stable when delivered by implantable intrathecal pump for long-term use.

Alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype specificity of intrathecally administered tizanidine used for analgesia for neuropathic pain

Object. Intrathecally administered α2-adrenergic receptor subtype—specific antagonists were used to determine which α2-adrenergic receptor subtype mediates the analgesic effect of intrathecally administered tizanidine in a chronic constriction injury (CCI) rat model of neuropathic pain.

Methods. Seven days after CCI and intrathecal catheter surgeries had been performed in Sprague—Dawley rats, baseline neuropathic pain tests including cold-floor ambulation and paw pinch were performed. Either the dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle (seven rats) or one of the antagonists—5, 23, or 46 µg yohimbine (22 rats); 5, 25, 50, or 100 µg prazosin (25 rats); or 5, 45, or 90 µg WB4101 (11 rats)—were intrathecally administered to the animals, followed in 30 minutes by 50 µg intrathecally administered tizanidine. The neuropathic pain tests were repeated 30 minutes later. The resulting profile showed a descending order of antagonist efficacy for yohimbine, prazosin, and WB4101 for the cold-floor ambulation test and for the paw-pinch test of the affected paw. As expected given tizanidine's lack of analgesic effect on the contralateral, normal paw, there were no effects of antagonists on contralateral paw responses. The results of the paw-pinch test on the affected side were compared with binding data cited in the existing literature for the three different α2-adrenergic receptor subtypes (α2A, α2B, and α2C) with yohimbine, prazosin, and WB4101. The antagonist response profile for the paw-pinch test of the affected paw most closely approximated the α2B receptor binding profile.

Conclusions. The antagonist profile from the current study is most consistent with the theory that the α2B-adrenergic receptor subtype mediates the analgesic effect of intrathecally administered tizanidine on CCI-associated neuropathic pain.

Evolving spinal analgesia practice in palliative care

Intraspinal analgesia can be helpful in some patients with intractable pain. Over 15 years palliative care professionals evolved their spinals policy through a repeated series of evaluations, discussions and literature reviews. One hundred intraspinal lines were then reviewed. Notable changes in policy were the switch from epidurals to intrathecals, and the insertion of lines during working hours rather than as emergencies. Our efficacy, and frequency of adverse effects, is equal or better to published studies. Key issues in reducing adverse effects were the improved care of the spinal line exit site, a change from bolus administration to continuous infusions, and modifying line insertion techniques. Current policy is to use continuous infusions of diamorphine and bupivacaine in a 1:5 ratio through externalized intrathecal lines. The lines are effective in approximately two thirds of patients and can be kept in place for up to 18 months. The policy continues to be updated and common documentation is now in place.

Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003: an update on the management of pain by intraspinal drug delivery-- report of an expert panel

Intraspinal drug infusion using fully implantable pump and catheter systems is a safe and effective therapy for selected patients with chronic pain. The options for this approach are increasing, as drugs that are commercially available for systemic administration are adapted to this use and other drugs that are in development specifically for intraspinal administration become available. In 2000 a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference was organized to evaluate the existing literature and develop guidelines for drug selection. The major outcome of this effort, an algorithm for drug selection, was based on the best available evidence at the time. Rapid changes have occurred in the science and practice of intraspinal infusion and a Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference 2003 was organized to pursue the following goals: 1) to review the literature on intraspinal drug infusion since 1999, 2) to revise the 2000 drug-selection algorithm, 3) to develop guidelines for optimizing drug dosage and concentration, 4) to create a process for documenting minimum evidence supporting the use of a drug for intraspinal infusion, and 5) to clarify issues pertaining to compounding of drugs. Based on the best available evidence and expert opinion, consensus recommendations were developed in all these areas. The panel's conclusions may provide a foundation for clinical practice and a rational basis for new research.

Continuous Intrathecal Infusion of Hydromorphone: Safety in the Sheep Model and Clinical Implications

OBJECTIVE

To determine the safety of hydromorphone delivered by continuous intrathecal infusion via implanted delivery systems in sheep.

DESIGN

Sheep implanted with intrathecal infusion systems were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5, 3, or 6 mg/day hydromorphone HCl or saline control (3 sheep/dose level) at a fixed infusion rate of 1.92 mL/day for 28-31 days. Infusions were initiated approximately 5 days after surgical implantation of the delivery systems (pumps and intrathecal catheters), and investigators were blinded to doses administered. An additional group of sheep (N=3) received hydromorphone (open label) at a dose of 12 mg/day. All animals were examined daily during drug infusion for changes in behavior and neurologic function. Cerebrospinal fluid was analyzed for protein, cytology, and hydromorphone concentration in samples collected prior to and at the end of drug infusion. The spinal cord with the catheter in situ was removed en bloc and fixed in formalin for microscopic analysis.

RESULTS

All sheep receiving intrathecal hydromorphone exhibited gaiting deficits and biting behavior over the caudal lumbar area above the infusion site. Animals treated with 12 mg/day were sedate and lethargic, and exhibited repeated biting behavior over the caudal lumbar area during the study. No lesions were noted in any animal upon gross evaluation of the spinal cord. Microscopic changes were comparable between hydromorphone- and saline-treated animals with one exception. Mild inflammation 5 cm cranial to the catheter tip was present in two of three sheep receiving 12 mg/day and in one of three sheep receiving 1.5 mg/day. Mild chronic inflammation hydromorphone in the vicinity of the catheter was also presented in saline-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydromorphone was not associated with inflammatory mass formation in the sheep model. Further studies are necessary to determine whether hydromorphone is a safer alternative to morphine for continuous intrathecal infusion for the treatment of chronic pain.

Continuous intrathecal clonidine and tizanidine in conscious dogs: analgesic and hemodynamic effects

Alpha-2-adrenergic agonists, such as clonidine, produce antinociception in animal pain models after intrathecal administration. However, clinical usage is limited by cardiovascular side effects. To investigate alternative alpha(2)-adrenergic agonists as analgesics, we implanted six dogs with an intrathecal catheter and infusion pump. After baseline saline infusion, animals received clonidine or tizanidine (crossover study) each week at escalating doses of 125-750 microg/h. Analgesia, blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, sedation, and coordination were evaluated. A 28-day safety study was performed with another nine dogs receiving intrathecal tizanidine (3 or 6 mg/d) or saline. Equal doses of clonidine and tizanidine produce the same antinociception in thermal withdrawal tests. Blood pressure was reduced with 125-500 microg/h of clonidine, but not with tizanidine at any dose. Clonidine 250 microg/h reduced heart rate by 45.8%, and five of six animals had bradyarrhythmias (marked bradycardia), whereas tizanidine decreased heart rate by 15.1% without arrhythmias, even at the largest dose. Respiratory rate decreased with 250 microg/h of clonidine and larger doses. Sedation or incoordination occurred only at the largest dose for either drug. The safety study indicated that 3 mg/d of tizanidine in dogs produced no side effects or histopathologic changes. Tizanidine may be a useful alternative in patients experiencing cardiovascular side effects with intrathecal infusion of clonidine.

IMPLICATIONS

Clonidine is an effective spinal analgesic, but it is dose-limited by cardiovascular side effects. We compared the analgesic properties and side effects of clonidine with those of a similar drug, tizanidine. Continuous spinal infusion of tizanidine produced similar analgesia as clonidine, but with fewer adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate.

Intrathecal drug delivery 2002

BACKGROUND

Intrathecal drug delivery has been used clinically since the 1970's. Significant clinical advances have been made combining new technology with pharmacology and surgery. Continuous infusion of medication for both analgesia and spasticity has become a part of the armamentarium for specialists in these areas. Significant recent advances in technology promise further enhancements and improvements for intrathecal therapy.

METHODS

A review of the literature combined with 20 years personal experience with intrathecal drug delivery.

FINDINGS/DISCUSSION

Intrathecal therapy has established a role in the treatment of malignant pain, benign pain and severe spasticity. Significant literature and the current state of practice in the United States are reviewed. Recent therapeutic enhancements are discussed, and a wish list of future technological enhancements presented.

The role of spinal opioid receptors in antinociceptive effects produced by intrathecal administration of hydromorphone and buprenorphine in the rat

The intrathecal administration of morphine has been the standard therapy to control long-term intractable pain. Recently, a panel of pain therapy experts suggested that because of the lack of efficacy or because of the side effects produced by morphine in some patients, other drugs, such as hydromorphone and buprenorphine, should be investigated for their analgesic properties. We designed this study to compare the efficacy of intrathecal hydromorphone and buprenorphine to suppress thermal nociception in male Sprague-Dawley rats. An additional objective was to understand whether hydromorphone and buprenorphine bind and act as agonists to mu-, delta-, and kappa-spinal opioid receptors. Intrathecally-administered hydromorphone and buprenorphine produced a dose- and time-dependent increase in the tail-flick response latency in rats. The 50% effective dose value for the antinociceptive effect of buprenorphine and hydromorphone were 4 and 69.5 nmol/L, respectively. Both drugs act as agonists to mu-opioid receptors, as determined by their ability to displace [(3)H]-DAMGO from the spinal opioid receptors and by the ability of an opioid receptor antagonist, naloxone, to reverse their antinociceptive effects. Buprenorphine also has an agonistic effect on the kappa-opioid receptors. For the first time, we report that intrathecal buprenorphine is approximately 17 times more effective than hydromorphone in inhibiting thermal pain, and buprenorphine produces its antinociceptive effect by acting as an agonist at both mu- and kappa-spinal opioid receptors. Naloxone administered intrathecally was effective in preventing the antinociceptive effects of subsequent intrathecal injections of buprenorphine.

IMPLICATIONS

Hydromorphone and buprenorphine are two important drugs used for pain relief. We observed that intrathecal buprenorphine is 17 times more potent than hydromorphone to inhibit pain in rats. Both drugs exert their effects through specific spinal opioid receptors.

Long-term intrathecal catheterization in the rat

We report an intrathecal (i.t.) catheter system that permits repeated administration of volumes of 10 microl or more in the awake rat over many months. A small skin incision is made and a 32 ga polyurethane catheter is inserted in the sacral subarachnoid space using a modified 22 ga needle. The other end of the catheter is tunneled subcutaneously to the flank and exteriorized through a titanium port. The device is well tolerated, does not cause sensory or motor deficits, and does not interfere with behavioral testing. Rats equipped with this device can be housed with other rats. Over the 9 month observation period the function of the catheter was verified by repeated injection of 15 microl of 2% lidocaine that caused temporary paraplegia. Out of 12 implanted rats, the number of fully functional catheters was 10 at 3 months, seven at 6 months, and six at 9 months. At 3 months, i.t. injection of anti-dopamine-beta-hydroxylase antibodies conjugated to saporin (DBH-SAP, 5 microg/10 microl) resulted in noradrenergic denervation of the spinal cord in all rats (n=10). We propose that intrathecal catheterization is well suited for long term behavioral and pharmacological studies.

A biopsychosocial overview of pretreatment screening of patients with pain

The prevalence and excessive cost of pain, especially when the pain becomes chronic, remains a major health-care problem in the United States. Currently, a biopsychosocial perspective of pain has been found to be the most heuristic approach to understanding and managing it. Using this perspective, an important advance has been made in the possibility of individually tailoring treatment for each patient, with the result being better outcomes. The author reviews the extant literature demonstrating a robust "psychosocial disability factor" among injured workers that is important not only in pain perception, but also in the subsequent development of chronic pain-related disability. Such results emphasize the importance of taking into account how psychosocial and physical factors are intertwined in a complex way in determining pain symptomatology. On the basis of these findings, a number of surgical pre-screening approaches have been developed and found to be effective for maximizing surgical outcomes as described by Carragee, Epker, and Block in other papers in this special topics series. Recently, several organizations in the U.S. have also developed new standards for the evaluation of pain. For example, the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Organizations (JCAHO) now requires that physicians consider pain as a "5th vital sign" in evaluating patients. Such initiatives have created a new mandate to regularly assess and manage all types of pain. The use of opioids, as well as implantable pain-management modalities, are among the options. The author notes that the literature on these modalities focuses on interdisciplinary patient-screening approaches prior to their administration as a way of maximizing treatment outcomes. The papers by Praeger, Jacobs, and Robinson et al. in this special topics series describe the approach to pretreatment assessment for these modalities in detail. Finally, the author presents a stepwise, biopsychosocial approach as the basis for assessment before decisions regarding surgery, opioid maintenance therapy, and implantable pain-management modalities. The author suggests that systematic pretreatment interventions will facilitate a more structured standard of care in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pain and ultimately better outcomes.

Cancer Pain: Progress Since the WHO Guidelines

In has been 15 years since the WHO Guidelines for the management of cancer pain were developed. This article reviews the guideline development and its effectiveness. Current trends in cancer care utilizing aggressive chemotherapeutic and surgical protocols lead to many patients living longer with advanced cancer and an attendant increase in pain. Future trends in cancer pain care are outlined.