Symptomatic or cryptogenic partial epilepsy of childhood onset: fourteen-year follow-up

Social outcomes for adults with a history of childhood-onset epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to describe social outcomes in adulthood for people with a history of childhood-onset epilepsy and identify factors associated with these outcomes; focused on educational attainment, employment, income/financial status, independence/living arrangement, romantic relationships, parenthood, and friendships.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PsycINFO was conducted, as well as forward and backward citation tracking. A total of 45 articles met inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, and subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE) with good prognosis (e.g., normal intelligence, 'epilepsy-only') and poor prognosis (e.g., intellectual disability, Dravet syndrome), and those who underwent epilepsy surgery in childhood.

RESULTS

Among all PWE, 73% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 64-82%) completed secondary school education, 63% (95%CI: 56-70%) were employed; 74% (95%CI: 68-81%) did not receive governmental financial assistance; 32% (95%CI: 25-39%) were in romantic relationships; 34% (95%CI: 24-45%) lived independently; 21% (95%CI:12-33%) had children, and 79% (95%CI: 71-87%) had close friend(s). People with epilepsy often fared worse relative to healthy controls. Among PWE with a good prognosis, a comparable number of studies reported similar/better outcomes relative to controls as reported poorer outcomes. The most consistent predictor of poorer outcomes was the presence of cognitive problems; results of studies evaluating seizure control were equivocal.

CONCLUSION

People with epilepsy with a good prognosis may show similar social outcomes as controls, though robust conclusions are difficult to make given the extant literature. Seizure control does not guarantee better outcomes. There is a need for more studies evaluating prognostic factors and studies with control groups to facilitate appropriate comparisons.

Long-term efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate: results of a 1-year open-label extension study in partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of once daily eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults with epilepsy.

METHODS

One-year open-label treatment extension with ESL in patients who completed a placebo-controlled pivotal study (Epilepsia 2009; 50: 454-463). Starting dose was 800 mg once daily, for 4 weeks; thereafter, dose could be titrated up or down. Doses of concomitant antiepileptic drugs were to be kept stable.

RESULTS

Overall, 314 patients were enrolled. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 312 patients, and 239 (76.6%) completed 1 year of treatment. ESL median dose was 800 mg once daily. Compared to baseline, median seizure frequency decreased by 39% during the first 4 weeks and between 48% and 56% thereafter. The responder rate (≥50% seizure reduction) was 41% during weeks 1-4 and, thereafter ranged between 48% and 53%. The proportion of seizure-free patients per 12-week interval ranged between 8.7% and 12.5%. Quality of life, as measured by the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31), and depressive symptoms, as measured by the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), improved significantly compared to baseline. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 51% of patients. The most frequent TEAEs were headache (10%), dizziness (10%), diplopia (5%), and nasopharyngitis (5%). TEAEs were mostly (97%) of mild to moderate intensity. Eleven patients (3.5%) discontinued due to TEAEs. There were no results of laboratory tests raising safety concerns.

DISCUSSION

Sustained therapeutic effect, favorable tolerability and safety, and an improvement in quality of life and depressive symptoms were observed during long-term add-on treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults with once daily ESL.

Surgery for epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery in general is viewed with many misconceptions about its safety and efficacy, and it is an under-used modality worldwide. This deficiency is particularly relevant to children, who stand to benefit the most from early remission of seizures and elimination of the need for potentially toxic AEDs. Advancements in the field and the ability to further sway public opinion toward the established safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery will come through less invasive techniques to map the epileptogenic zone (eg, EEG, fMRI, MEG) and reversible strategies such as neurostimulation/neuromodulation to control seizures. Two multicenter trials are underway to test the efficacy of thalamic and cortical stimulation via more sophisticated technology and devices than those available in the past.

Factors associated with poor control in partial complex epilepsy

To evaluate the predictive factors of response to anticonvulsant therapy in children with complex partial epilepsy, we studied prospectively 74 children and adolescents suffering from this type of epilepsy. All children were prospectively followed for at least 2 years after the beginning of anticonvulsant therapy. At the end of follow-up, the children were subdivided into two groups according to the frequency of seizures: group A, children who were seizure free in the last year, and group B, children with at least six seizures in the previous year. Children with a poor response to anticonvulsant therapy had a more frequent personal history of neonatal seizures, an interval of less than 6 months between the first and the second seizures, and persistent abnormal electroencephalograms than the seizure-free patients and were often treated with polytherapy.