Esophageal varices. II. TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) and surgical therapy

Long-term results of the paraesophagogastric devascularization with or without esophageal transection: which is more suitable for variceal bleeding?

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that the paraesophagogastric devascularization with esophageal transection procedure, also known as the modified Sugiura procedure, was effective in the treatment of variceal bleeding. However, it was not widely accepted by other surgeons because of the high rate of rebleeding, complications, and mortality. To discover the effects of the paraesophagogastric devascularization procedure and the modified Sugiura procedure, we retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of these two procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During January 1990 and December 2009, 278 patients with variceal bleeding underwent devascularization after failed pharmacotherapy and endotherapy. In these 278 patients, 180 underwent paraesophagogastric devascularization without esophageal transection (group I), and the other 98 patients were subjected to the modified Sugiura procedure (group II).

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 7.2% in group I, and 9.2% in group II (P = 0.563). The postoperative rebleeding rate in the two groups was 2.2 and 3.1%, respectively (P = 0.474). After a mean follow-up of 67.9 ± 37.3 months and 67.4 ± 44.6 months, respectively, esophageal transaction-related morbidity (leak, bleeding, and stricture) was 8.2% (8/98) in group II and 0% (0/180) in group I (P < 0.001). The overall rebleeding rate was 27% (41/152) in group I, and 27.2% (22/81) in group II (P = 0.976). The overall mortality was 28.3% (43/152) in group I, and 28.4% (23/81) in group II (P = 0.986).

CONCLUSIONS

In the management of variceal bleeding, paraesophagogastric devascularization without esophageal transection is as effective and safe as devascularization with esophageal transaction, but with less esophageal transection-related morbidity.

Nonendoscopic management strategies for acute esophagogastric variceal bleeding

Acute variceal bleeding is a potentially life-threatening complication of portal hypertension. Management consists of emergent hemostasis, therapy directed at hemodynamic resuscitation, protection of the airway, and prevention and treatment of complications including prophylactic use of antibiotics. Endoscopic treatment remains the mainstay in the management of acute variceal bleeding in combination with pharmacotherapy aimed at reducing portal pressure. This article intends to highlight only the current nonendoscopic treatment approaches for control of acute variceal bleeding.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an established procedure for the complications of portal hypertension. The largest body of evidence for its use has been supported for recurrent or refractory variceal bleeding and refractory ascites. Its use has also been advocated for acute variceal bleed, hepatic hydrothorax, and hepatorenal syndrome. With the replacement of bare metal stents with polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stents, shunt patency has improved dramatically, thus, improving outcomes. Therefore, reassessment of its utility, management of its complications, and understanding of various TIPS techniques is important.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt versus endoscopic sclerotherapy in the elective treatment of recurrent variceal bleeding

The present study was designed to compare elective transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) and endoscopic sclerotherapy (EST) in terms of their efficacy in preventing recurrent bleeding from gastro-oesophageal varices in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Of 96 patients with at least three gastro-oesophageal variceal rebleeds, 50 were treated with elective TIPS and 46 with EST. Recurrent variceal bleeding was significantly more frequent in patients receiving EST treatment compared with those receiving TIPS (45.7% versus 6.3%, respectively). Cumulative 1- and 4-year survival in the TIPS group was 83.0% and 73.5%, respectively, compared with 69.8% and 39.8% in the EST group, respectively. The rate of portosystemic encephalopathy was 33.3% in the TIPS group and 37.0% in the EST group. Elective TIPS was more effective than EST in the prevention of gastro-oesophageal variceal rebleeding in cirrhotic patients, it improved survival and it was associated with a similar rate of portosystemic encephalopathy.

Transabdominal modified devascularization procedure with or without esophageal stapler transection--an operation adequate for effective control of a variceal bleed. Is esophageal stapler transection necessary?

BACKGROUND

In Japan, the original Sugiura procedure reported favorable results in non-cirrhotic patients but in the West, the modified Sugiura procedure is not widely accepted because of high rebleeding, morbidity, and mortality in cirrhotics. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of our modified Sugiura procedure i.e., devascularization with/without esophageal transection combined with salvage endotherapy and pharmacotherapy for control of a variceal bleed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 1999 and December 2004, 912 patients with variceal bleeding were treated. Of these, 66 (7.2%) patients were subjected to surgery after failed endotherapy/propranolol. Among these 66 patients, 52 had transabdominal devascularization (16 emergency, 36 elective); 14 patients underwent devascularization with esophageal stapler transection (group I), and 38 patients had devascularization without esophageal stapler transection (group II). Another 14 patients underwent elective end-to-side proximal splenorenal shunt surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperative mortality was 7.1% in group I, 10.5% in group II (P>0.05). Mortality for emergency surgery was 31.2% (5/16) but there were no deaths in the elective surgery group. Overall morbidity was 57.1% in group I and 21.0% in group II (P<0.05). The rates of variceal rebleeding were 7.1% and 7.8%; residual varices were 30.7% and 32.3%; recurrent varices were 7.6% and 5.8% following the group I and group II procedures, respectively, over a mean follow-up period of 39.9 (7-2) months. Esophageal transection-related morbidity (leak, stricture, and bleeding) was 21.4% (3/14) in group I.

CONCLUSIONS

Devascularization without esophageal stapler transection is a safe and effective procedure for adequate (urgent and long-term) control of variceal bleeding with similar results and less morbidity when compared to devascularization with esophageal transection in cirrhotic patients, as well as non-cirrhotic patients.

Liver involvement in cystic fibrosis

The hepatobiliary manifestations of cystic fibrosis (CF) encompass a broad clinical spectrum, from mild steatosis, associated with poor nutrition, to multilobular cirrhosis and the complications of portal hypertension. The factor(s) responsible for the development and progression of liver disease in a subset of patients with CF are unknown. Liver disease can be silent and progressive, manifesting only with complications associated with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Clinical evaluation for detecting and monitoring the progression of liver disease includes the following: physical examination of the liver, biochemical tests of liver function and injury, and radiological imaging with abdominal ultrasonography. Careful monitoring should take place in all patients with CF, as currently, there are no sensitive and/or specific historical or biochemical markers to predict who is at risk for the development of liver disease. Current treatment options for CF-associated liver disease are very limited. The bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid may improve biochemical parameters of liver disease, but its long-term efficacy in preventing the progression of liver disease in CF is unproven. Treatment therefore rests on optimizing nutritional status; correcting fat-soluble vitamin, essential fatty acid, and other mineral deficiencies; and treating complications of end-stage liver disease, such as pruritus, ascites, and portal hypertension.

The use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt in the management of acute oesophageal variceal haemorrhage

Variceal haemorrhage is a common and serious complication of portal hypertension. Endoscopic therapy is successful in the majority in controlling bleeding but in those who continue to bleed transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt is highly effective in achieving haemostasis, although the evidence base that this is associated with improved survival is limited. This review discusses initial management and then the particular role of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt. A management algorithm is proposed. The timing of intervention is emphasized and the importance of admission to specialized centres. Regional protocols are probably essential for the latter to be organized effectively.

Endoscopic variceal ligation vs. propranolol for prevention of first variceal bleeding: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Data in the literature regarding the role of endoscopic variceal ligation for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients are controversial. To further explore this issue we have compared ligation and propranolol treatment in a prospective randomized study.

METHODS

Sixty patients with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history but at high risk of bleeding were randomized to ligation treatment (30 patients) or propranolol (30 patients). Patients were followed for approximately 27.5 months.

RESULTS

Variceal obliteration was achieved in 28 patients (93.3%) after 3+/-1 sessions. The mean daily dose of propranolol was 60.3+/-13.3 mg. Two patients (6.7%) in the ligation group and nine patients (30%) in the propranolol group developed variceal bleeding (P = 0.043). The actuarial risks of variceal bleeding at 2 years were 6.7% and 25%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, propranolol treatment and grade III varices turned out to be predictive factors for the risk of variceal bleeding. Mortality was not different between the two groups. There were no serious complications due to ligation. Propranolol treatment was discontinued in four patients because of side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Variceal ligation is a safe and more effective method than propranolol treatment for the prevention of first variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with high-risk varices.

Differences in long-term survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for refractory ascites and variceal bleed

OBJECTIVE

To compare the survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for refractory ascites and variceal bleed, and to identify the factors predictive of survival.

METHODS

Single tertiary center, retrospective-prospective study. Chart review was performed on all patients who underwent TIPS between 1993 and 2000 and prospective follow-up to determine survival. Pre- and post-TIPS clinical parameters were compared and Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to compare the survival of both groups. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of survival after TIPS.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were included, 62 with refractory ascites and 101 with variceal bleed. Both groups had similar age (48.2 vs 48.9 year; P = 0.65) and consisted of predominantly Caucasians (51%) and Mexican-Americans (39%). More than 75% had chronic hepatitis C, alcoholic liver disease or both. Overall, the median survival was significantly better for variceal bleed (2 years) compared with refractory ascites (6 months) (P < 0.001). This survival advantage persisted in patients with Mayo risk score greater than 1.17. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt improved severe ascites in 45% of patients (P = 0.03). Mayo risk score was highly predictive of survival after TIPS with a hazard ratio of 2.3, followed by Child-Pugh score, creatinine, albumin and ethnicity, with better survival among Mexican-Americans. Shunt dysfunction (31%) and hepatic encephalopathy (27%) were the most common complications of TIPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received TIPS for variceal bleed had significantly longer survival compared with those for refractory ascites. Mexican-Americans had an improved long-term survival compared with Caucasians. The reason for this ethnic difference in survival is unclear and warrants further prospective evaluation.

Efficacy and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding

OBJECTIVES

Although esophageal varices are the most common site of variceal bleeding, extraesophageal varices cause up to 30% of variceal bleeding. Unlike esophageal variceal bleeding, the experience in management of extraesophageal variceal bleeding, especially nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding is limited, and there are no established guidelines for treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding. This study aims to provide experience in treatment of nongastric extraesophageal variceal bleeding with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a tertiary medical center.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases, admitted or transferred to Emory University Hospital, with extraesophageal variceal bleeding who had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt as the final resolution to control bleeding over a period of 4 years, from January 1999 to January 2003. We also compared the outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients (33 gastric varices and 8 nongastric extraesophageal varices) with extraesophageal variceal bleeding who had transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt performed were identified in this study period. Bleeding was controlled immediately in 90% (37/41) of those patients. The mortality was 7% (3/41). The rebleeding rate was 10% (4/41). Encephalopathy occurred in 24% (10/41) of the patients. Patients with gastric varices bleeding appeared to have more advanced liver disease than patients with nongastric extraesophageal varices bleeding. The outcomes after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt is an effective and safe treatment of extraesophageal variceal bleeding, including bleeding from gastric varices and nongastric extraesophageal varices.

Equality of the left and right renal venous flow predicts the severity of variceal bleeding in portal hypertensive children

Portasystemic collaterals develop as a result of portal hypertension. The collaterals in the cardioesophageal region is the leading cause of bleeding from esophageal varices. Some of the portal hypertensive patients present with bleeding episodes but the others do not, and some of the bleeders do not respond to endoscopic sclerotherapy procedure, although the underlying pathology is the same. The capacity of the natural collateral vessels might be a determining factor about the hemorrhagic events. Since the first step of portasystemic collateralization takes place in the naturally existent vascular channels, the present study, with its anatomic and clinical parts, was focused on these venous structures.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: current status

The transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was developed in the 1980s for treatment of complications of portal hypertension. Once it was shown that the shunt could be placed with relative ease, TIPS was rapidly applied to the treatment of many of the complications of portal hypertension. These complications include actively bleeding gastroesophageal varices, prevention of rebleeding from varices, control of refractory cirrhotic ascites and hepatic hydrothorax, and treatment of hepatorenal failure and hepatopulmonary syndrome. TIPS has also been used as therapy for Budd-Chiari syndrome and veno-occlusive disease. Despite these broad applications, TIPS has been compared with other forms of therapy in only 2 situations: prevention of rebleeding from varices and control of refractory cirrhotic ascites. In the trials, TIPS was shown to provide better control of these 2 complications of portal hypertension than standard forms of therapy. However, there was no improvement in survival and the incidence of encephalopathy was greater for patients receiving a TIPS. Thus, the use of TIPS for the control of ascites and prevention of rebleeding from varices should be limited to a select group of patients. There have been no controlled trials for the other indications listed. Despite the apparent efficacy of TIPS in many of these situations, its use should be limited to salvage therapy pending the publication of controlled trials showing it is a better treatment than other forms of therapy.

Current use of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts

The principal indication for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) continues to be rescue therapy for variceal hemorrhage that cannot be controlled by endoscopic or medical therapy. TIPS provide no survival advantage in prevention of rebleeding or refractory ascites. The indications for TIPS continue to expand, however, especially for Budd-Chiari syndrome and hydrothorax. Other more novel indications include bleeding portal hypertensive gastropathy or ectopic varices, Budd-Chiari syndrome, veno-occlusive disease, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, and polycystic liver disease. Great strides have been made recently in models to predict mortality and complications following TIPS placement. Graft stents hold promise based on early studies. Finally, complications are common and may be life threatening.

Preliminary results of a new expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent-graft for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedures

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) with a new expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent and the influence of the covering on occlusion rate.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Twenty cirrhotic patients (57 +/- 11 years old) admitted with a history of esophageal variceal bleeding (n = 11), refractory ascites (n = 5), or both (n = 4) were included. Five of the patients were treated for TIPS revision, and 15 as de novo TIPS placements. The endoprostheses used were composed of a 2-cm noncovered nitinol stent and a 4- to 8-cm expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene graft covering, and were placed from the portal vein to the ostium of the hepatic vein. Patients underwent Doppler sonography at discharge and again at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months and underwent venography with portosystemic pressure gradient measurement at 6 months and whenever necessary.

RESULTS

At the time of this writing, complications included three TIPS restenoses and one recurrent ascites successfully treated by balloon dilation, two cases of segmentary liver ischemia, and one patient with encephalopathy that required shunt reduction. After TIPS placement, the portosystemic pressure gradient dropped from 18 +/- 5 to 5 +/- 4 mm Hg. Primary and secondary patency rates were 80% and 100%, respectively, at 387 days.

CONCLUSION

These results clearly show the feasibility of TIPS placement with the Gore TIPS endoprosthesis stent-graft and its improved patency compared with results in the literature for bare stents. These preliminary results must be certified further with randomized comparative trials between covered and noncovered TIPS stents.